1:25: 🌍 The Earth's early conditions were inhospitable, with a high proportion of gases and little oxygen in the atmosphere. 8:29: 🔬 The origin of life is one of the three most important mysteries, along with the origin of our universe and the origin of man on Earth. 17:43: 🌌 Life could exist in the form of germs in the universe, transferred from one planet to another. 26:17: 🧪 Experiments have shown that organic compounds can be synthesized from simple molecules, leading to the concept of the primordial soup of life. 43:37: 🌍 The presence of the Moon has accelerated the tectonic development of the Earth, creating comfortable conditions for the emergence and development of highly structured organisms. 52:23: 🌍 The video discusses the importance of degassing in the formation of life on Earth. 1:01:43: 🌊 Revolutionary changes occurred in the biota of the oceans during the early Proterozoic era, including the widespread presence of blue-green algae and the formation of stromatolites. 1:09:35: 💡 The presence of free iron in the Precambrian mantle and its oxidation in contact with water suggests that most of the oxygen produced by pre-Cambrian phytoplankton was rapidly consumed. 1:17:56: 🌊 Fluctuations in ocean levels have had a significant impact on Earth's climate in the past, softening climate variations and creating new sea corridors for heat exchange. 1:26:46: 🌊 Tropical zones in oligotrophic water zones, volcanic island chains, and migration of larval forms contribute to the dispersal of shallow water marine fauna. 1:35:31: 🌊 The reduction of calcium carbonate and phosphorus in the world's oceans during the mid Cretaceous period led to the degradation of reef communities and the erosion of ancient coral atolls. 1:44:09: 🌍 The video discusses the interaction between the biosphere and geological processes, and how they have influenced the evolution of life on Earth. Recap by Tammy AI
Thank you so much for sharing such fascinating videos about the mysteries of the universe! I'm always in awe of the wonders that exist beyond our planet.
😶🌫️ mind-blowing... That's why religions were invented... Most of people will say "can't comprehend this that's why there must be a god to guide us" I'm like "no thanks... religions are an easy explanation to existence... an escape from the complicated analysis of life and matter"
ai voices are very annoying, cant watch such videos anymore. after we got image-creation by AI, people don't make pictures anymore, now nobody wants to talk because an ai can (barely) do it for them, we are heading in the wrong direction. peppz are afraid to be replaced by ai's, but then some replace their voices by an crappy ai. like "social media" where nothing at all is social.
AI voices are so recognizable - and creepy, especially in a documentary about life...and I found this unwatchable for that reason. Too bad... I'm sure the information it presents is very interesting. There's another post on UA-cam with a visual depiction of the evolution of the Earth and life on it and it actually goes to after the Earth is destroyed by the sun when it expands to a red giant - but then the post says that the AI type entity that humans will have sent out to explore even other galaxies (because we're talking billions of years from now) was spoken of as if it was the continuation of the human race. Scary - but by then, we'll have all become cyber organisms ourselves...
@@guruware8612Couldn't agree more. And it's distressing because I would love the content. Another sign of the deterioration of our culture... And most people seem to oblivious. And now we can't get away from continual references to AI, including regular marketing to have it brought more fully into our own individual lives. God help us...
Life isn't so much created as evolved through natural processes... after all, there are only natural processes. No others have ever been discovered so they can't be claimed as causes of anything.
Can anyone explain how millions of specified protien machines coalesed into functionality ( without knowing what specified function they would be task with) then mindlessly swirled specified coded information into existence to coordinate all of them into a singular function Aka self replicating life! ( again without knowing what protien machines are much less what function each one performs) anyone care to try or will you simply cry about this post??
Excellent and very comprehensive and detailed presentation of the complexity of and uncertainties surrounding the emergence and progression of life on Earth. Whoever produced the script knows a thing two about the subject and it shows. Well done!
@@peterzinya1 National Library of Medicine Water and Aqueous Mixtures as Convenient Alternative Media for Organoselenium Chemistry Water is the natural medium for all biochemical reactions and is often claimed as an ideal green solvent [1,2] because it is non-toxic and non-flammable, has a high heat capacity in adsorbing the energy produced during a chemical reaction, and has low cost and large availability. Breslow [3], Sharpless [4], and several other authors [5] reported reactions that can be efficiently conducted “in-water” or “on-water” conditions. This latter term describes those reactions that when performed in vigorously stirred aqueous suspension showed a remarkable rate acceleration, only partially due to the well-known hydrophobic effect [6], which, on the contrary, has been demonstrated to be responsible for the selectivity observed in some biomimetic protocol performed using water as a reaction medium [7,8,9,10,11]. Despite the low solubility or complete insolubility of organic molecules, water presents several unique physical properties that can affect the reactivity and selectivity, such as hydrogen bonding, acidity, polarity, and entropy.
Perhaps you should see some of Dr James Tour’s analysis on origen of life. You have bypassed the most essential requirements for abiogenesis which you should not leave unaddressed.
Tour only misrepresents and demeans real origin of life research, which is not his field of expertise, to promote his religion and the supernatural, AKA Creationism, for which there is no data and no evidence. It’s a dishonest disservice to science and scientists.
The oldest rocks on Earth are 4.2 to 4.3 billion years old and found in eastern Canada. They contain hematite, magnetite, and other formations proving Earth had oceans and enough oxygen to saturate the water to create iron rust in water (hematite). The hematite (ie water & oxygen) it think strong evidence that photosynthetic organisms already existed and were creating lots of oxygen from CO2 and sunlight. The photosynthetic single cell organisms probably existed in shallow lakes and/or in eddies along the seashore.
@@Rocketter ""In 2001, geologists found the oldest known rocks on Earth, the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt, on the coast of the Hudson Bay in northern Quebec. Geologists dated the oldest parts of the rockbed to about 4.28 billion years ago""> They found hematite (rusted iron in water) in these rocks. The hematite indicates that enough oxygen was being produced to rust dissolved iron in the water. This is evidence that photosynthesis was already occurring on early Earth perhaps 4.2 billion years ago. ""Scientists recently found evidence of ancient lifeforms in rocks in Canada. Within these fossils were tiny tubes of a mineral called hematite"". ""Ancient traces of microbial life that are between 3.77 billion and 4.29 billion years old might have been unearthed in a rocky outcropping in Canada""
Yes. The Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt. It's a fascinating place. I was watching a programme which had a segment on Nuvvuagittuq Belt and rocks which are at the surface now were formed about 12 miles down. Early earth geology is one of my favourite subjects.
Wrong. @8:40 the origin of man on earth? This is well understood. You sound like a theist. The origin of consciousness... Now that is an unexplained phenomenon.
@@iamBlackGambitEnergy is the source of all things in the universe. Complexity increases as interaction continues. Chemicals are a form of energy emergent from there. They didn’t exist until stars began to explode.
If the earth was mostly water 3.8 billion years ago, how could there have been very little Oxygen around? What makes Oxygen? Therefore what makes water?
Oxygen is an element. It is not "made" unless you are referring to its creation inside an exploding super nova. Oxygen in water is not vailable for creatures to breathe. Have you tried breathing some water lately? The oxygen in H2O (water) is very different from O2 (molecular or free oxygen).
@@toni4729 Water is a molecule consisting of two atoms of hydrogen (an element) and one atom of oxygen (also an element). If there is lots of water, it follows there is lots of oxygen, but that oxygen is not necessarily available for life to use. Similarly, there is lots of water inside the rocks that make up meteors and even the the rocks on the moon and Mars, but that water is not available without the application of great forces like heat, physical collisions (heat again), radiation (energy), or some chemical process or processes. There was lots of Oxygen early in our planet's history, but it was readily available in the atmosphere for a long time.
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT AND ITS ROLE IN THE ORIGIN OF LIFE. Paper. Introduction. A number of recent studies suggest that ultraviolet radiation may be a necessary ingredient in the origin of life. Further, one may hypothesize that the daily solar cycle and the Sun's UV radiation were important in all stages of the origin of life on Earth. Moreover, it is suggested that life can be defined as that chemical reaction forced by the energy cycle of the Sun, under very specific circumstances. Evidence. In support of these claims are the following assumptions and lines of evidence: 1. The assumption that all stages of the origin of life took place at or near the surface and close to or on land. 2. The assumption that there was a lower solar luminosity, higher UV flux, and no ozone layer in the period of the origin. 3. The assumption that there was a shorter diurnal, day/night cycle, due to the faster rotation of the Earth following the presumed collision that preceded the formation of the Moon. 4. The assumption that chemical selection was for stability under the Sun heat cycle. 5. The assumption that solar radiation far exceeded all other energy available for organic synthesis, including electrical discharges, shock waves, radioactivity to a depth of 1 km, volcanoes, and cosmic rays. 6. The assumption that there were wet/dry cycles that drove phosphorylation of nucleotides and perhaps other condensation reactions. 7. The assumption that there was at first a primitive, environmentally forced, PCR-like replication process of alternating heat and cold that denatured then annealed RNA paired strands. It is assumed that the Sun cycle (day and night) caused a cycle of primitive denaturing and annealing of paired RNA nucleotide strands [and possibly folded (annealed) and unfolded (denatured) nucleotide strands]. It is assumed that this provided a large number of variations of paired RNA strands with variations of properties, the most stable of which possessed the best Watson-Crick (W-C) pairing. 8. It is assumed that instead of a self replicator, there was at first a primitive, Sun-forced replication process. It is assumed that proof reading would at first have been limited to W-C pairing over non W-C pairing for stability. Note also the assumption that paired bases may have better protected the ribose-phosphate backbones from UV damage. 9. The assumption that the first coded information would have been for that molecule which was most stable in the Sun/heat cycle environment. Note: in Watson-Crick base pairing in RNA there are two sets of nucleotide bases: G bonds to C and A bonds to U. It is assumed that Watson-Crick base pairing is more stable in this environment than non Watson-Crick base pairing. And of the two sets of bases, It is assumed that the G-C bonds would have been more stable than A-U bonds because G-C bonds have 3 hydrogen bonds instead of the 2 of A-U. It is also assumed that A-U would have been more stable than non Watson-Crick base pairing. Further it is assumed that high G-C base pairing would have supported more stability than high A-U base pairing. Additionally it is assumed that A-U base pairing would have supported more stability than non Watson-Crick base pairing, or no base pairing at all. It is also assumed that high A-U base pairing would allow for more variation than G-C base pairing, because A-U bonds are more likely to denature in heat and more likely to denature quicker than G-C bonds and thus more likely to anneal with other RNA strands in cooler temperatures. It is assumed that overall the G-C plus A-U sets of nucleotides would promote both general stability with the G-C set, and variety with the A-U set of nucleotides. 10. The assumption that RNA acted as a receptor and transducer of UV radiation. 11. The assumption that there was a cyanobacteria-like lifestyle for the earliest confirmed true organisms so far, and that this earliest remnant of life is very near the likely origin of life. 12. The assumption that there was a pyrimidine dimer impact on the genetic code. It is assumed that because of the high UV during this period, UV-caused pyrimidine dimers would also be highly likely. This further assumes that this would not favor any code with adjacent pyrimidines that would lead to the likelihood of pyrimidine dimers. This further assumes that the most likely first codons would be either purine / pyrimidine / purine, or pyrimidine / purine / pyrimidine; coding that prevents adjacent pyrimidines and thus pyrimidine dimers. Later it is assumed that this would lead to information coding beginning in the 2nd position, or middle position, the most protected position of the 3 base codon and anticodon. It is assumed that this initial coding may have been limited to 2 classes or sets of amino acids; hydrophilic (XAX with "A" in 2nd protected position) and hydrophobic (XUX with U in 2nd protected position). There is also the assumption that there was a pyrimidine dimer impact on tRNA which, it is further assumed, was one of the earliest forms of RNA. 13. The assumption that the Miller / Urey experiments are seen as an illustration of a heat cycle, "energized by a cyclical electrical discharge apparatus to represent UV radiation from the Sun." 14. The assumption that the first mechanism that used sunlight energy to remove hydrogen from water may have been UV radiation on ferrous ions. Magnetite, a mixed oxide of ferrous and ferric iron found in banded iron formations (BIF) may be remnants of that process. This hypothesis avoids problems in competing theories.
@@garystocker4742 False, you can't prove it's true. Religion is faith based, meaning it's without evidence. Religion and schizophrenia go hand in hand. Seek psychiatric help.
@ginomatusasiamen8336 your very foolish if you think the perfect alignment of the earth moon and sun, and life etc is one big accident of blind mindless non living forces. Houses don't build themselves, A.I DIDNT create itself, and yet humans had no creator? The earth had no maker, you're a fool.
@@garystocker4742 The book of Genesis? You mean the book that is scientifically refuted in multiple ways? What about it? Did you bring it up for a good laugh?
I don't understand what should cause the release of Oxygen from the mantle. Yes, when Uranium and Thorium decay into Lead some Oxygen bound to them should be released (Lead hold one atom of Oxygen,Thorium two and Uranium up to 3) but there should still be Ferrous minerals in the mantle that can be Oxidized to Ferric minerals and absorb it.
Dude at 1:35 were is that place, just asking cause it is real close to my island where i live! I live in Porto Santo and that is a small rock from south of the island! If it is, no fucking way!!!!
I really wish these documentaries would just get to the point.. so much unnecessary fluff and back stories on insignificant individuals who weren’t even close in their hypotheses. Truly detrimental to exponential growth by opening paths that lead to nowhere.
The author says all you need to know when he states "most scientists believe". That is an astounding claim! He just admitted that there is no observable, or testable, evidence supporting abiogenesis! He rightly claimed that there is no scientific evidence that life arose from non-life. Amazing, but true, statement!
I never said that. Observable science says that life only comes from life. The big question is where did the first life come. That is a question that only the bible can answer.
A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP. Cheap as an e book.
Scientist's are loosing the run of themselves these days. They expect us to believe everything they come up with. most of which is, we think , were pretty sure and it more than likely happened. All theory. For years it was the big bang, their now saying they MIGHT have got that a bit wrong. At the end of the day there is more immediate things we need to look into.
Because some chemical processes can be considered the same. Fire respires, feeds, replicates itself but is not alive. Acids too although they dont replucate the are more complex.
“ABC development. … THUS, we can believe DEF ensued … WHEREAS GEF followes…” Methinks the narrator ought reflect that such terms imply more than simple filler words between items on a timeline.
If someone can sit on the floor when there's a sofa and wear a hat when it isn't snowing then silicone can make life if, say, atmospheric pressure was a few barres less and bonds worked differently because of variants of the standard model maybe on the other side of a black hole. Maybe silicone wouldn't exist there though.
@@toni4729 I can't believe you're muddling this around in your head.... There is no signs of evolution nobody's evolving no animals are evolving they're instincts evolve.... Why don't you read the Bible before you deny it a little tip when it comes to self-awareness.
Ambitious and interesting film. But like a lot of commenters, I'm playing back at x1.25 speed. Also, I keep getting distracted by the mispronunciation of people's names. Is this a computer-generated narration, perhaps? Or a human narrator who has no knowledge of the history of science and has been given no guidance on pronunciation? It lets down an otherwise fairly well-researched and fairly accurate production.
The origins of life the easy reader edition, one page one line long. Not complicated or over dramatized and easy to understand, I'll go with that thanks.
@@toni4729 that’s a pretty big statement… what’s the harm in taking a little more time to research the question? If you’re right, no harm… but if you’re wrong, there could be consequences. So why not keep an open-mind? What do you have to lose?
Things within this range in size 20 micrometers across on averaged; from 2 to 50 μm diameter Water droplet in the clouds Dust particles in air Fungus spores Smallest bacteria 0.3 micrometter Mushrooms, 92% water Round earth orbit and outermost atmosphere exosphere is fungus colonies thriving all round, throwing spores into the space at force that is inertia to infinity space. Then a pone finding a host planet they colonies it from top down to its orbit and Spore Discharge out into deep space. This fungus are the vehicle, a life vassal travelling vast distances only to find a host planet for it to grow on its and expand to explode into space and the journey continuous. By this all planet with liquid water must have life of carbon based life. At which level of sophistication I don’t know, nor I don’t know if they have any civilization but for life am sure there is life out their in all the habitable planets. The speed of travelling is further aided by comet as they cut across different galaxies to make the whole space the garden of fungus.
@@devilmonkey427 The animals and living things don't need to talk. All you need is a pair of light sensitive sensor called eyes to see the amazing construct before you, a living, moving, physical 'video' of the real story these livings things is showing you, it is more than just telling you...why these sort of animals.. weaver bird's nest, archer fish, why talking parrots but no talking chimps, how animals know how to breast feed their young, their by themselves gravitate towards their mother for milk, and much much more stories these animal tell you, not fairy tales. The only fairy tale is what this video is saying. Nothing to see, just speculation.
@@johnkoay8097 In your magic fairy tales it says in Mark 16:18 that you can drink poison..... Care to demonstrate? I"ll buy you all the Drano you can drink.
The beginning and the End most likely be the same. Because even if they're not 'Comets', nuclear weapons are certain to be use one of these days. My opinion, Nura KC Nigeria 🇳🇬🥂
I’m going to listen to this Several times. All. These technical descriptions made it difficult. But I don’t agree with the future perspective. I. Don’t think there will be life on earth around a billion eyes ahead. Then there had to come a new genesis! But why do I care
I have discovered the conditions, events, and processes for how complex life emerged from single celled bacteria. I also have found a few additional factors for how life emerged on Earth some 4 Billion years ago. No guesses or hypothesis, empirical evidence.
@@WaxPaper That is what my objective is - to write the manuscript to submit for publication in science and medical journals. Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence. I have 95% of empirical evidence, I just need a little more research to verify the final 5%. I have fully funded all or my own research, but 7 surgeries from a car crash put me in a financial bind and I need a grant to finish the project. I will also include in the manuscript the additional factors for how life emerged about 4 Billion years ago. With what I have discovered, there has been multiple cases to backup my discovery. I want to make sure everything is 100% so I can get the credit for the discoveries.
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger You apparently didn't read that my objective is to publish the manuscript in science and medical journals for all to read. People need to make sure their brains are loaded before they shoot their mouth off....
Play at 1.25
If you're watching whilst trying to zone out, keep at 1x
Play at 2x if your name is Ben Shapiro.
He's too busy dealing with dry walls
1 , to sleep. 1.25 to absorbe it 1:24
I laughed way to hard at this comment. +1 Bud, Gold Star.@@verbalkint1770
1:25: 🌍 The Earth's early conditions were inhospitable, with a high proportion of gases and little oxygen in the atmosphere.
8:29: 🔬 The origin of life is one of the three most important mysteries, along with the origin of our universe and the origin of man on Earth.
17:43: 🌌 Life could exist in the form of germs in the universe, transferred from one planet to another.
26:17: 🧪 Experiments have shown that organic compounds can be synthesized from simple molecules, leading to the concept of the primordial soup of life.
43:37: 🌍 The presence of the Moon has accelerated the tectonic development of the Earth, creating comfortable conditions for the emergence and development of highly structured organisms.
52:23: 🌍 The video discusses the importance of degassing in the formation of life on Earth.
1:01:43: 🌊 Revolutionary changes occurred in the biota of the oceans during the early Proterozoic era, including the widespread presence of blue-green algae and the formation of stromatolites.
1:09:35: 💡 The presence of free iron in the Precambrian mantle and its oxidation in contact with water suggests that most of the oxygen produced by pre-Cambrian phytoplankton was rapidly consumed.
1:17:56: 🌊 Fluctuations in ocean levels have had a significant impact on Earth's climate in the past, softening climate variations and creating new sea corridors for heat exchange.
1:26:46: 🌊 Tropical zones in oligotrophic water zones, volcanic island chains, and migration of larval forms contribute to the dispersal of shallow water marine fauna.
1:35:31: 🌊 The reduction of calcium carbonate and phosphorus in the world's oceans during the mid Cretaceous period led to the degradation of reef communities and the erosion of ancient coral atolls.
1:44:09: 🌍 The video discusses the interaction between the biosphere and geological processes, and how they have influenced the evolution of life on Earth.
Recap by Tammy AI
Thanks
Just mentioning: the description box has
a time-indexed table of contents,
a list of "key concepts," &
a transcript.
i love you thanks bro 😭🙏🙏
By far the best video I have ever seen on 'how life began on earth'...
Interesting content, but thank you, UA-cam, for 1.25X speed.
Thank you for the tip
In summation..nobody knows...
In summary you fell asleep
Oh I missed it..link me where the answer is will you..?? @@rebirthofthecool5619
Thank you so much for sharing such fascinating videos about the mysteries of the universe! I'm always in awe of the wonders that exist beyond our planet.
Ditto! I’m in love with this. Adding it to my “Fall of Sleep” playlist.
😶🌫️ mind-blowing...
That's why religions were invented...
Most of people will say "can't comprehend this that's why there must be a god to guide us"
I'm like "no thanks... religions are an easy explanation to existence... an escape from the complicated analysis of life and matter"
The easiest and most naive explanation for life is 'it spontaneously appeared out of nowhere due to chemical reactions'.
Mind blowing, you think u are above all those religion and people by saying the beginning of life is randomness, bravo you are now a scientist. ❤
The AI voice works well for Torture, not so much for a documentary.
ai voices are very annoying, cant watch such videos anymore.
after we got image-creation by AI, people don't make pictures anymore, now nobody wants to talk because an ai can (barely) do it for them,
we are heading in the wrong direction.
peppz are afraid to be replaced by ai's, but then some replace their voices by an crappy ai.
like "social media" where nothing at all is social.
it's somehow bearable at 1,25 speed
AI voices are so recognizable - and creepy, especially in a documentary about life...and I found this unwatchable for that reason. Too bad... I'm sure the information it presents is very interesting.
There's another post on UA-cam with a visual depiction of the evolution of the Earth and life on it and it actually goes to after the Earth is destroyed by the sun when it expands to a red giant - but then the post says that the AI type entity that humans will have sent out to explore even other galaxies (because we're talking billions of years from now) was spoken of as if it was the continuation of the human race. Scary - but by then, we'll have all become cyber organisms ourselves...
@@guruware8612Couldn't agree more. And it's distressing because I would love the content. Another sign of the deterioration of our culture... And most people seem to oblivious. And now we can't get away from continual references to AI, including regular marketing to have it brought more fully into our own individual lives.
God help us...
I really want to watch this. But I just cannot bear that voice
Imagine how life started. Very fantastic
It really is AMAZING that nature is so powerful - to be able to "create" all life on Earth.
Life isn't so much created as evolved through natural processes... after all, there are only natural processes. No others have ever been discovered so they can't be claimed as causes of anything.
It isn't so much created (a somewhat vague term) as evolves through chemical processes.
Thank the resilient microbes that persevered through it all so that you can stand here today and read this comment
Right lol something out of nothing.
We are so lucky.
Can anyone explain how millions of specified protien machines coalesed into functionality ( without knowing what specified function they would be task with) then mindlessly swirled specified coded information into existence to coordinate all of them into a singular function Aka self replicating life! ( again without knowing what protien machines are much less what function each one performs) anyone care to try or will you simply cry about this post??
I couldn’t understand why describing non-living matter, early pre-proteins, Protozoa was shown as illustration.
It's part of the journey from simple to complex chemistry and then simple to complex life.
Play at 1.25. I was there I can confirm..
Excellent and very comprehensive and detailed presentation of the complexity of and uncertainties surrounding the emergence and progression of life on Earth. Whoever produced the script knows a thing two about the subject and it shows. Well done!
Whoever produced this ignores the fact that biomolecules wont form in water. Not just wont, but cant.
@@peterzinya1 National Library of Medicine
Water and Aqueous Mixtures as Convenient Alternative Media for Organoselenium Chemistry
Water is the natural medium for all biochemical reactions and is often claimed as an ideal green solvent [1,2] because it is non-toxic and non-flammable, has a high heat capacity in adsorbing the energy produced during a chemical reaction, and has low cost and large availability. Breslow [3], Sharpless [4], and several other authors [5] reported reactions that can be efficiently conducted “in-water” or “on-water” conditions. This latter term describes those reactions that when performed in vigorously stirred aqueous suspension showed a remarkable rate acceleration, only partially due to the well-known hydrophobic effect [6], which, on the contrary, has been demonstrated to be responsible for the selectivity observed in some biomimetic protocol performed using water as a reaction medium [7,8,9,10,11]. Despite the low solubility or complete insolubility of organic molecules, water presents several unique physical properties that can affect the reactivity and selectivity, such as hydrogen bonding, acidity, polarity, and entropy.
The Decay Hypothesis: ( short version ) Life is a part of a celestial body’s decay process if it is located where a stable organic chain can occur.
Perhaps you should see some of Dr James Tour’s analysis on origen of life. You have bypassed the most essential requirements for abiogenesis which you should not leave unaddressed.
The Origin of Life: Not as Hard as it Looks? Jack Szosta, Spring 2023 Eyring Lecturer
ua-cam.com/video/ZLzyco3Q_Rg/v-deo.html
Tour only misrepresents and demeans real origin of life research, which is not his field of expertise, to promote his religion and the supernatural, AKA Creationism, for which there is no data and no evidence. It’s a dishonest disservice to science and scientists.
What is the time period you chose?
If this guy talked any slower, he’d trip over his tongue
Yea I'm on the brink of a coma.
I'm now playing at x1.5 speed!
He's just trying too hard Leonard Nimoy was best at fascinating
Let's just complain about something
The oldest rocks on Earth are 4.2 to 4.3 billion years old and found in eastern Canada. They contain hematite, magnetite, and other formations proving Earth had oceans and enough oxygen to saturate the water to create iron rust in water (hematite). The hematite (ie water & oxygen) it think strong evidence that photosynthetic organisms already existed and were creating lots of oxygen from CO2 and sunlight. The photosynthetic single cell organisms probably existed in shallow lakes and/or in eddies along the seashore.
To the best of my knowledge the oldest rocks are found in Africa.
@@Rocketter ""In 2001, geologists found the oldest known rocks on Earth, the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt, on the coast of the Hudson Bay in northern Quebec. Geologists dated the oldest parts of the rockbed to about 4.28 billion years ago"">
They found hematite (rusted iron in water) in these rocks. The hematite indicates that enough oxygen was being produced to rust dissolved iron in the water. This is evidence that photosynthesis was already occurring on early Earth perhaps 4.2 billion years ago.
""Scientists recently found evidence of ancient lifeforms in rocks in Canada. Within these fossils were tiny tubes of a mineral called hematite"". ""Ancient traces of microbial life that are between 3.77 billion and 4.29 billion years old might have been unearthed in a rocky outcropping in Canada""
@@Rocketter I think you're thinking about human origin. Rocks were present during the first land mass which included both Canada and Africa.
Yes. The Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt. It's a fascinating place. I was watching a programme which had a segment on Nuvvuagittuq Belt and rocks which are at the surface now were formed about 12 miles down. Early earth geology is one of my favourite subjects.
yeah australia has Stromatolites that are over 3.5 billion years old and there to be water for a while before that then.
Why is this video in Slow motion? Im playing this in 1.5 speed rn lol you did that just to bump the watch time up.
Its perfect for me i use these vids to fall asleep on
I was there I can confirm.
Yy
You sound like trump
Was it you who had the camera.
@@seanreid349 Don't be rude. He was joking, Trump wasn't.
Great stuff
Another video probably created with almost no human involvement. The script sounds AI generated, and it is read by a bot.
Great video but why does the AI voice sometimes sound like Forest, Forest Gump?
Pure speculation!
*An excellent representation of what we do, and do not know.*
Love the historical tie in, of how we discovered what was right & what was wrong.
God bless you God is good Jesus is Lord.
Unlike Bill Clinton Adam did have sexual relations with Eve and with Gods help she brought forth Man.
In the beginning, God created everything in 6 days😊
Dr. James tour enters the chat
Anyone els falling asleep to this ?? if so sweet dreams. 💕🌙🪐
Nice I'll hope to see ngain tomorrow so 😂🎉
Wrong.
@8:40 the origin of man on earth? This is well understood.
You sound like a theist.
The origin of consciousness... Now that is an unexplained phenomenon.
Life was born from a "SIMPLE" chemical reaction...SIMPLE???? 👍🏾 ok...
😂🤣
Far enough back, everything comes from simple chemical reactions. Complex ones are a result of those.
@@danielpaulson8838 where did the "chemical reactions" come from? point is, something, had to have always existed (eternal)..
@@iamBlackGambitEnergy is the source of all things in the universe. Complexity increases as interaction continues. Chemicals are a form of energy emergent from there. They didn’t exist until stars began to explode.
@@danielpaulson8838 so energy is eternal is what your saying?
IT BEGAN ON MY BIRTHDAY!!!
If the earth was mostly water 3.8 billion years ago, how could there have been very little Oxygen around? What makes Oxygen? Therefore what makes water?
Oxygen is an element. It is not "made" unless you are referring to its creation inside an exploding super nova. Oxygen in water is not vailable for creatures to breathe. Have you tried breathing some water lately? The oxygen in H2O (water) is very different from O2 (molecular or free oxygen).
@@tombirol1693 What is water made of? Water isn't an element. Think my friend.
@@toni4729 Water is a molecule consisting of two atoms of hydrogen (an element) and one atom of oxygen (also an element). If there is lots of water, it follows there is lots of oxygen, but that oxygen is not necessarily available for life to use. Similarly, there is lots of water inside the rocks that make up meteors and even the the rocks on the moon and Mars, but that water is not available without the application of great forces like heat, physical collisions (heat again), radiation (energy), or some chemical process or processes.
There was lots of Oxygen early in our planet's history, but it was readily available in the atmosphere for a long time.
@@tombirol1693 We agree then, there was a lot of oxygen.
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT AND ITS ROLE IN THE ORIGIN OF LIFE. Paper.
Introduction. A number of recent studies suggest that ultraviolet radiation may be a necessary ingredient in the origin of life. Further, one may hypothesize that the daily solar cycle and the Sun's UV radiation were important in all stages of the origin of life on Earth. Moreover, it is suggested that life can be defined as that chemical reaction forced by the energy cycle of the Sun, under very specific circumstances.
Evidence. In support of these claims are the following assumptions and lines of evidence:
1. The assumption that all stages of the origin of life took place at or near the surface and close to or on land.
2. The assumption that there was a lower solar luminosity, higher UV flux, and no ozone layer in the period of the origin.
3. The assumption that there was a shorter diurnal, day/night cycle, due to the faster rotation of the Earth following the presumed collision that preceded the formation of the Moon.
4. The assumption that chemical selection was for stability under the Sun heat cycle.
5. The assumption that solar radiation far exceeded all other energy available for organic synthesis, including electrical discharges, shock waves, radioactivity to a depth of 1 km, volcanoes, and cosmic rays.
6. The assumption that there were wet/dry cycles that drove phosphorylation of nucleotides and perhaps other condensation reactions.
7. The assumption that there was at first a primitive, environmentally forced, PCR-like replication process of alternating heat and cold that denatured then annealed RNA paired strands. It is assumed that the Sun cycle (day and night) caused a cycle of primitive denaturing and annealing of paired RNA nucleotide strands [and possibly folded (annealed) and unfolded (denatured) nucleotide strands]. It is assumed that this provided a large number of variations of paired RNA strands with variations of properties, the most stable of which possessed the best Watson-Crick (W-C) pairing.
8. It is assumed that instead of a self replicator, there was at first a primitive, Sun-forced replication process. It is assumed that proof reading would at first have been limited to W-C pairing over non W-C pairing for stability. Note also the assumption that paired bases may have better protected the ribose-phosphate backbones from UV damage.
9. The assumption that the first coded information would have been for that molecule which was most stable in the Sun/heat cycle environment. Note: in Watson-Crick base pairing in RNA there are two sets of nucleotide bases: G bonds to C and A bonds to U. It is assumed that Watson-Crick base pairing is more stable in this environment than non Watson-Crick base pairing. And of the two sets of bases, It is assumed that the G-C bonds would have been more stable than A-U bonds because G-C bonds have 3 hydrogen bonds instead of the 2 of A-U. It is also assumed that A-U would have been more stable than non Watson-Crick base pairing. Further it is assumed that high G-C base pairing would have supported more stability than high A-U base pairing. Additionally it is assumed that A-U base pairing would have supported more stability than non Watson-Crick base pairing, or no base pairing at all. It is also assumed that high A-U base pairing would allow for more variation than G-C base pairing, because A-U bonds are more likely to denature in heat and more likely to denature quicker than G-C bonds and thus more likely to anneal with other RNA strands in cooler temperatures. It is assumed that overall the G-C plus A-U sets of nucleotides would promote both general stability with the G-C set, and variety with the A-U set of nucleotides.
10. The assumption that RNA acted as a receptor and transducer of UV radiation.
11. The assumption that there was a cyanobacteria-like lifestyle for the earliest confirmed true organisms so far, and that this earliest remnant of life is very near the likely origin of life.
12. The assumption that there was a pyrimidine dimer impact on the genetic code. It is assumed that because of the high UV during this period, UV-caused pyrimidine dimers would also be highly likely. This further assumes that this would not favor any code with adjacent pyrimidines that would lead to the likelihood of pyrimidine dimers. This further assumes that the most likely first codons would be either purine / pyrimidine / purine, or pyrimidine / purine / pyrimidine; coding that prevents adjacent pyrimidines and thus pyrimidine dimers. Later it is assumed that this would lead to information coding beginning in the 2nd position, or middle position, the most protected position of the 3 base codon and anticodon. It is assumed that this initial coding may have been limited to 2 classes or sets of amino acids; hydrophilic (XAX with "A" in 2nd protected position) and hydrophobic (XUX with U in 2nd protected position). There is also the assumption that there was a pyrimidine dimer impact on tRNA which, it is further assumed, was one of the earliest forms of RNA.
13. The assumption that the Miller / Urey experiments are seen as an illustration of a heat cycle, "energized by a cyclical electrical discharge apparatus to represent UV radiation from the Sun."
14. The assumption that the first mechanism that used sunlight energy to remove hydrogen from water may have been UV radiation on ferrous ions. Magnetite, a mixed oxide of ferrous and ferric iron found in banded iron formations (BIF) may be remnants of that process.
This hypothesis avoids problems in competing theories.
6000yrs ago God created everything 😊
We may have a lot of theories about existence
But we wont be able to figure it out
In our lifetime
The book of Genesis
@@garystocker4742
False, you can't prove it's true. Religion is faith based, meaning it's without evidence.
Religion and schizophrenia go hand in hand. Seek psychiatric help.
@@garystocker4742that's basically garbage it wouldn't even get through the scientific method. Throw that idea straight to the trash bin🤣
@ginomatusasiamen8336 your very foolish if you think the perfect alignment of the earth moon and sun, and life etc is one big accident of blind mindless non living forces. Houses don't build themselves, A.I DIDNT create itself, and yet humans had no creator? The earth had no maker, you're a fool.
@@garystocker4742 The book of Genesis? You mean the book that is scientifically refuted in multiple ways? What about it? Did you bring it up for a good laugh?
pitty youtube in android tv does not allow speed changes
I don't understand what should cause the release of Oxygen from the mantle. Yes, when Uranium and Thorium decay into Lead some Oxygen bound to them should be released (Lead hold one atom of Oxygen,Thorium two and Uranium up to 3) but there should still be Ferrous minerals in the mantle that can be Oxidized to Ferric minerals and absorb it.
The Oxygen in the atmosphere is from the water, the Hydrogen is lost in outer space, a few ton every year I believe.
Dude at 1:35 were is that place, just asking cause it is real close to my island where i live! I live in Porto Santo and that is a small rock from south of the island! If it is, no fucking way!!!!
Ads are bad. Don’t watch if you’re trying to sleep.
What about air borne bacteria
Smart tube better than youtube
Background music is too distracting making it very difficult to listen to the narrator.
This narrator is annoying most people, including me with his "SZZZ" endings - and he won't learn and he won't be fired.
I noticed the szzz too😅😂😂
Wonder why the sound guy can't cut it out.
1szzt thing I noticed
The speech idiosyncrasies are rather obviously because it is NOT a narrator - it's an AI generated voiceover.
But yes, extremely annoying.
The "narrator" is obviously an AI program used by a non-English speaker...who needs more practice ;)
How about 'we don't know'? I mean, it IS an option.
Is the narrator related to Forrest Gump?
Play at 0.25x if you are trying to sleep.
Play at 1.5X speed
SEE: UA-cam, Martin Hanczyc: The line between life and not-life
I really wish these documentaries would just get to the point.. so much unnecessary fluff and back stories on insignificant individuals who weren’t even close in their hypotheses. Truly detrimental to exponential growth by opening paths that lead to nowhere.
The author says all you need to know when he states "most scientists believe".
That is an astounding claim!
He just admitted that there is no observable, or testable, evidence supporting abiogenesis!
He rightly claimed that there is no scientific evidence that life arose from non-life.
Amazing, but true, statement!
So life was always here? That's quite the claim you're making.
I never said that. Observable science says that life only comes from life. The big question is where did the first life come.
That is a question that only the bible can answer.
@@nahshon9998 Why not the Qur'an? Why not the Discworld novels?
@@GuardianSoulkeeper Liar! I didn't say that.
@@GuardianSoulkeeper you can use the Quran is you like. You have one?
There is no evidence that interorganic material can create organic material period where does the information come from?
You have no idea, it is way beyond your understanding.
Forrest Gump AI strikes again
A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP. Cheap as an e book.
Managed to last 3 minutes and 47 seconds before the slow commentary was too much to bear. Shame, as the subject is an interesting one.
Why? Why is a complex molecule spontaneously self replicating insufficient explanation?
Scientist's are loosing the run of themselves these days. They expect us to believe everything they come up with. most of which is, we think , were pretty sure and it more than likely happened. All theory. For years it was the big bang, their now saying they MIGHT have got that a bit wrong. At the end of the day there is more immediate things we need to look into.
Because some chemical processes can be considered the same. Fire respires, feeds, replicates itself but is not alive. Acids too although they dont replucate the are more complex.
Wikipedia it
Is this a real voice?
i think so, he just had weird cadence and pronounces words ending S as "Szzzz" its very distracting.
No, it's an echo into a pair of trousers.
24:54
“ABC development. … THUS, we can believe DEF ensued … WHEREAS GEF followes…”
Methinks the narrator ought reflect that such terms imply more than simple filler words between items on a timeline.
I think it's a synthetized voice
I am not going to "like" something before I have watched it, so stop asking for a "like" in the start of a video.
They haven't got a clue. The complexity boggles the mind.
Hey. Forrest Gump is narrating. LOL
If someone can sit on the floor when there's a sofa and wear a hat when it isn't snowing then silicone can make life if, say, atmospheric pressure was a few barres less and bonds worked differently because of variants of the standard model maybe on the other side of a black hole. Maybe silicone wouldn't exist there though.
Love your comment.😅
Silicone, or silicon?
👌
😅
Why did we stop evolving if we are evolution?
Why are other animals not evolving.... And it's not the same as adapting.
You expect to see it happen in a week?
@@toni4729 I can't believe you're muddling this around in your head.... There is no signs of evolution nobody's evolving no animals are evolving they're instincts evolve.... Why don't you read the Bible before you deny it a little tip when it comes to self-awareness.
@@number1enemyoftheuseless985 maybe you should read the Bible and see how unscientific it is
1.25 speed = normal speaking. Smh
That is why Religion was created People had no lnowledge of things so a story was a simple way of explaining
The way he's pronouncing coacervates makes me think he's talking about a lesser-known Spanish conquistador.
He mispronounces a lot of complex words and at least one name.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 slapping my knee laughing
Exactly
Life came from all the asteroids that hit earth
14:16
Too slow for me
I did.
Thesis documentaries are hilarious when they say “scientists” believe😂
Ambitious and interesting film. But like a lot of commenters, I'm playing back at x1.25 speed. Also, I keep getting distracted by the mispronunciation of people's names. Is this a computer-generated narration, perhaps? Or a human narrator who has no knowledge of the history of science and has been given no guidance on pronunciation? It lets down an otherwise fairly well-researched and fairly accurate production.
Your supposition at the beginning made me click away and dislike.
God created life in his generosity, glory and majesty. He then created Man just to prove he has a sense of humor.
Then God created himself for the fun of it.
A dead rock came to life 🤔
The origins of life the easy reader edition, one page one line long. Not complicated or over dramatized and easy to understand, I'll go with that thanks.
One thing's for sure, God didn't do it.
@@toni4729 that’s a pretty big statement… what’s the harm in taking a little more time to research the question?
If you’re right, no harm… but if you’re wrong, there could be consequences. So why not keep an open-mind? What do you have to lose?
I know. The overseer did.@@toni4729
You are religious aren't you
Things within this range in size
20 micrometers across on averaged; from 2 to 50 μm diameter
Water droplet in the clouds
Dust particles in air
Fungus spores
Smallest bacteria 0.3 micrometter
Mushrooms, 92% water
Round earth orbit and outermost atmosphere exosphere is fungus colonies thriving all round, throwing spores into the space at force that is inertia to infinity space. Then a pone finding a host planet they colonies it from top down to its orbit and Spore Discharge out into deep space.
This fungus are the vehicle, a life vassal travelling vast distances only to find a host planet for it to grow on its and expand to explode into space and the journey continuous. By this all planet with liquid water must have life of carbon based life. At which level of sophistication I don’t know, nor I don’t know if they have any civilization but for life am sure there is life out their in all the habitable planets. The speed of travelling is further aided by comet as they cut across different galaxies to make the whole space the garden of fungus.
Can't listen
None of this was witnessed or can be proven in any way so shouldn't be presented as if it's factual. 🤨
god is a big lie
Until someone comes out after a disaster and says it was an act of God, and its generally a politician trying to cover his ass.
It is just a story, a fairy tale, as no scientist has the proof for it.
Clueless, is the word James Tour use to accurately described it.
Did your talking animals from your fairy tales tell you that?
The programming in the DNA, not 2 dimensions, but in 3 dimensions, tells you this video is a fairy tale. Wake up man, wake up.
@@devilmonkey427
The animals and living things don't need to talk. All you need is a pair of light sensitive sensor called eyes to see the amazing construct before you, a living, moving, physical 'video' of the real story these livings things is showing you, it is more than just telling you...why these sort of animals.. weaver bird's nest, archer fish, why talking parrots but no talking chimps, how animals know how to breast feed their young, their by themselves gravitate towards their mother for milk, and much much more stories these animal tell you, not fairy tales.
The only fairy tale is what this video is saying. Nothing to see, just speculation.
@@johnkoay8097 In your magic fairy tales it says in Mark 16:18 that you can drink poison..... Care to demonstrate?
I"ll buy you all the Drano you can drink.
@@johnkoay8097 Let me know when you discover magic..... And how you know it's from your specific fairy tale invisible wizard.
Well, I like your pronunciation of albumin better than mine, though.
You can’t say the earth was mostly water but no oxygen in the air.
The only thing worse than the writing in this video, is this guy's infuriating and grating voice. This is the walmart version of a documentary.
Oh and you need to reduce your upper mid range and probably high range. Way too much sibilance.
The voice sounds constipated.
Everything is the same age
The beginning and the End most likely be the same.
Because even if they're not 'Comets', nuclear weapons are certain to be use one of these days.
My opinion, Nura KC Nigeria 🇳🇬🥂
Carbon dating is my special process, probably the best
I’m going to listen to this Several times. All. These technical descriptions made it difficult. But I don’t agree with the future perspective. I. Don’t think there will be life on earth around a billion eyes ahead. Then there had to come a new genesis! But why do I care
""Documentary""😂😂 lol
HE SPEAKS TO SLOW
I have discovered the conditions, events, and processes for how complex life emerged from single celled bacteria. I also have found a few additional factors for how life emerged on Earth some 4 Billion years ago. No guesses or hypothesis, empirical evidence.
Write a paper, submit it for review. I'd like to know how simple life arose, though.
@@WaxPaper That is what my objective is - to write the manuscript to submit for publication in science and medical journals. Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence. I have 95% of empirical evidence, I just need a little more research to verify the final 5%. I have fully funded all or my own research, but 7 surgeries from a car crash put me in a financial bind and I need a grant to finish the project.
I will also include in the manuscript the additional factors for how life emerged about 4 Billion years ago. With what I have discovered, there has been multiple cases to backup my discovery. I want to make sure everything is 100% so I can get the credit for the discoveries.
@@cncpreferred848 I believe you. Oh, by the way, I am God. Just believe me.
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger You apparently didn't read that my objective is to publish the manuscript in science and medical journals for all to read. People need to make sure their brains are loaded before they shoot their mouth off....
What if earth is created by god ?
Which one?
👍👍
Ozone detection is key for life evidence earth is alone