Are you referring to the part where we put the matrix into reduced row echelon form? If so, feel free to reference this playlist on the subject of elementary row operations, row echelon form, and reduced row echelon form: ua-cam.com/play/PLbXD_y3xfhTY0oIwklv9HTmHU8RJbFeNc.html
So... not really sure what you are intending with this comment, but it is definitely inaccurate. Expanding the left side would give -♠^2+2♠+3 rather than what we see on the right side of your equation.
![Diagonalizing 3x3 Matrix - Full Process [Passing Linear Algebra]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0kA_VqHSpGg/mqdefault.jpg)
Just what I was looking for, thanks! Thanks for the trick at the end where v_2 and v_3 are free. Does that method work for matrices like this?
When there are two free variables, then yes, this will work well.
The part we came here for is the part you decided to use a calculator instead of showing us how it's done 😢
Are you referring to the part where we put the matrix into reduced row echelon form? If so, feel free to reference this playlist on the subject of elementary row operations, row echelon form, and reduced row echelon form:
ua-cam.com/play/PLbXD_y3xfhTY0oIwklv9HTmHU8RJbFeNc.html
its just basic gaussian elimination, you can find tons of tutorials on that
I@@brosisjk3993 its not its not even related
david saturday
(3-♤)(♤+1)= -♤^2+4♤+3
So... not really sure what you are intending with this comment, but it is definitely inaccurate. Expanding the left side would give -♠^2+2♠+3 rather than what we see on the right side of your equation.