First, Boeing should get their act together, fix the issues of the B737 Max, launch the long-awaited B777X, and then we can start talking about how Boeing can compete with Airbus on certain aircraft types.
Boeing's market assessment that SA aircraft make up only 0.3% of all long haul flights misses the point, in that there were no SA aircraft available to undertake this role. Now that the A321XLR has arrived, expect that 0.3% to climb dramatically.
Flights over 3000nm make 0.3% of SA flights globally in 2016 is due to the lack of SA aircrafts that could do this route effectively. A321XLR is for long thin routes, needed in lesser numbers. A321neo already fulfills the role of an aircraft for 3000nm routes easily.
I'm left scratching my head after watching your video. So Boeing "responded" to the A321XLR with the 737 Max 10 because they wanted to compete in this market segment. Then in the end you said that they werent aiming to compete at all because their marketing research show otherwise. Then there's that part that Boeing concluded that only 0.3% of flights are thin and long range, but isnt this because prior to the A321XLR there was no single aisle aircraft for that market to begin with?!?
It would be much better if Boeing just brought back the 757 with a flight range longer than the old ones, despite that they refuse to build it ever again.
The major problem of the Boeing Max 10 is she has no EICAS available. And it can't be solved because there is no place in the cockpit for it.😢 And Boeing has spent a lot of cash with the 777x...
The 737 is maxed out. Boeing and those McDonnell Douglas accountants and accounting practices will screw things up. Boeing can't even finish existing projects on time. Worse, certified aircraft in the air still suffer problems. And tell the jargon-riddled AI to stop overusing "game changer".
I don't care, I will never fly a single aisle aircraft on the Atlantic run. Years ago, the only non-stop flight I could get from Stockholm to Stateside was on a 757. That's too long of a flight to sit on a single aisle plane. Won't do it.
A seat is a seat irrespective the number of aisles . In fact the advantage of single aisles planes is the rapid embarking and exiting at the destination ( fewer pax) .
I've flown the Atlantic on a 757. Shear torture - small seat pitch (airline's choice) and narrow cabin (Boeing's choice). I've also flown the Atlantic on an A321neo, with a much better seat pitch and Airbus's wider cabin, and it was a great experience.
First, Boeing should get their act together, fix the issues of the B737 Max, launch the long-awaited B777X, and then we can start talking about how Boeing can compete with Airbus on certain aircraft types.
Boeing's market assessment that SA aircraft make up only 0.3% of all long haul flights misses the point, in that there were no SA aircraft available to undertake this role. Now that the A321XLR has arrived, expect that 0.3% to climb dramatically.
It was a study from 2016 🤣
The max 10 is not a competitor to the A321XLR or LR but to the bases A321 NEO. The video seems confused to put it kindly.
Flights over 3000nm make 0.3% of SA flights globally in 2016 is due to the lack of SA aircrafts that could do this route effectively. A321XLR is for long thin routes, needed in lesser numbers. A321neo already fulfills the role of an aircraft for 3000nm routes easily.
I'm left scratching my head after watching your video. So Boeing "responded" to the A321XLR with the 737 Max 10 because they wanted to compete in this market segment. Then in the end you said that they werent aiming to compete at all because their marketing research show otherwise. Then there's that part that Boeing concluded that only 0.3% of flights are thin and long range, but isnt this because prior to the A321XLR there was no single aisle aircraft for that market to begin with?!?
It would be much better if Boeing just brought back the 757 with a flight range longer than the old ones, despite that they refuse to build it ever again.
I agree, Boeing isn’t in a position to pick and choose because right now they are behind Airbus, and this is coming from a big Boeing fan.
I wouldn’t set foot on a Max and the - 10 is no different. I don’t have a death wish so only fly on Airbus equipped airlines.
I would be crazy getting on a Boeing as a pilot
The major problem of the Boeing Max 10 is she has no EICAS available. And it can't be solved because there is no place in the cockpit for it.😢
And Boeing has spent a lot of cash with the 777x...
Anyways, I didn't know what will happened the truth behind BOEING'S rival with AIRBUS A321xlr for the next year later.
Given that Boeing is not in a promising state, I don’t think the new product would be pushed forward as scheduled.
Boeing, you should have ditched the 737 programme about 30 years ago. Start from scratch and stop bodging and stretching a tired design from the 60s.
This video is very good and informative you deserve way more views good job!
Thanks!!
Omg
The 737 is maxed out. Boeing and those McDonnell Douglas accountants and accounting practices will screw things up. Boeing can't even finish existing projects on time. Worse, certified aircraft in the air still suffer problems. And tell the jargon-riddled AI to stop overusing "game changer".
lol airbus has the A321 exixsts so no worries there
I don't care, I will never fly a single aisle aircraft on the Atlantic run. Years ago, the only non-stop flight I could get from Stockholm to Stateside was on a 757.
That's too long of a flight to sit on a single aisle plane.
Won't do it.
A seat is a seat irrespective the number of aisles . In fact the advantage of single aisles planes is the rapid embarking and exiting at the destination ( fewer pax) .
I've flown the Atlantic on a 757. Shear torture - small seat pitch (airline's choice) and narrow cabin (Boeing's choice). I've also flown the Atlantic on an A321neo, with a much better seat pitch and Airbus's wider cabin, and it was a great experience.
max 10 is safe.
its less power than your av boeing
but no exploding fuel tanks