if you have an higher end pc and you can play with an higher actual render distance you shold do it. the higher is the distance of the switch between dh loaded chucks and chunck loaded for real the better it's gonna look overall.
@@alessandrogiavazzidiminishing returns my friend, even if your kitted out with 128gb of ddr5 ram and a Godly CPU, theres no point in investing all those resources into a long render distance when you cant notice the tiny details in the distance to begin with. If your using a high intensity pbr resourcepack with a ton of custom 3D models and animations then having your render distance too high could overload the GPU's memory in certain biomes like Jungle. (This is because of too many vertices in the models which takes up VRAM) If you wanted to get the best of both worlds *and* use a high intensity resourcepack with shaders then the DH+Iris+Bliss combo is currently the only thing that allows that right now. I do however agree that turning your render distance down to like 5 with DH+Iris looks icky, it should be atleast 10+ imo in order to look any good. Hopefully as time goes by, it will get more stable and more shaderpack creators will update their packs to work with DH.
@@gavinferguson2938”My friend” your wrong. The switch from normal chunks to DH rendered chunks from 8 render distance is horrible. From 32 render distance almost seamless. If that’s diminishing returns then you’re blind.
Definitely, lots of clueless people here say put it on 4-8 or some shit lol, like they've never seen the garbo LOD from DH. Unless you zoom in with a render distance of 32, you won't ever notice how bad it looks. With 4-8 you don't need to zoom in, it just looks like shit right in front of your eyes.
@@Bread011pretty sure Minecraft is heavy single core performance and so the Intel 14900k would probably be better Edit: Don't get Intel... or at least 13th and 14th generation since it has a lot of instability issues, AMD is the way to go
Tip for anyone trying this yourself. you can (and maybe should) turn your vanilla render distance WAYY down after distant horizons is on for much better performance. you could turn it down as low as 4 if you wanted, but id recommend at least 8-12 or maybe even 16
Lower your render distance, you have distant horizon to compensate for lower render distance, that's the whole point of it Edit: Thanks for 100 likes, most I've ever gotten s comment
maybe I'm wrong, but if he lowers his render distance while using a texture pack, wouldn't the difference between DH lod and real world generation be way too noticiable? There would be a line where the blocks go from Patrix x128 to the distant horizon's fake blocks and it would probably stick out like a sore thumb
@@sk8_bort That's where the shaders enters, becasue of it, you can't really notices the difference between the real chunks and lod ones, except if you really pay attention to it.
All I need to play minecraft again is some ambiance like birds chirping and wind, distant horizons, small amount of shaders just nice looking water and light and leaves moving in the wind. Just something to make the world feel more alive. And some terrain mod like terralith or something. Maybe something to add more cool biomes and small things to the game.
This is the road to hell, my friend. 😜 The dreaded "all I need" rabbit hole. All I need for mincraft is just some A,B,and C. And D, and maybe some E and F. Oooh, G looks nice, and H shouldn't be too bad.... Pretty soon you're out of alphabet and running 300+ mods. 😁
@@Sqouty So you think a shader pack, a terrain mod and distant horizons gives you "some ambiance like birds chirping and wind, distant horizons, small amount of shaders just nice looking water and light and leaves moving in the wind. Just something to make the world feel more alive. And some terrain mod like terralith or something. Maybe something to add more cool biomes and small things to the game." Lol. "Just something to make the world feel more alive" could easily be 4 or 5 all by itself, not to even mention "add small things to the game". Besides, it doesn't start at 300; it's incremental creep. Everybody's different. It was a joke, not a challenge.
@@gavinferguson2938 graalVM is an alternate java virtual machine ( a virtual environment where java code is compiled into java bytecode and then it is executed ) that adds a lot of optimizations and improves code execution performance significantly. By, default JVM ( java virtual machine ) is the default, which is very good at optimizing Java code and making it efficient, but its default garbage collection technique can cause performance drops, as it has pause the entire java process until the GC has been completed, graalVM improves that and a bunch other technical stuff.
@@gavinferguson2938yes, there are better versions of java that can make the game run better. mojang prebundles an old and poop version of java with their game, but in lots of launchers, you can point it to run off of a custom version of java if you have it installed. definitely look it up, i'm sure someone around has tested which ones are best for certain hardware combinations
Awesome video. I started playing Minecraft only recently because of my daughter. And we're starting to make videos together too. I want to go down the rabbit hole of graphics mods. Currently sitting on a 3060, but considering a rebuild in the near future with 50 series around the corner.
It’s actually less about the graphics card and more about your CPU, the cpu does the whole mod gen atleast. DH has shown me that my cpu thermal paste is not applied properly, has it overheat several times till I configurated everything perfectly. Once I get a new CPU I’ll also get better cooling and pay more attention to applying the paste.
To me, the problem with these realistic mods is that they change the perception of size and scale. Things look larger with the realistic mod pack, which may visually break some builds.
This guy's computer should be running this MUCH better, but he left his full render distance maxed out at 32 chunks. Which is very counter productive with this mod. And he also put 300 chunks for the DH mod, a bit overkill 😂. The CPU is being held hostage by rendering a billion chunks for the mod. Hence the aweful framerate. I tried this out on my PC and I'm getting anywhere from 60-100 fps Mod chunks set to 150, normal chunks set to 12. Mod quality at maximum. Plus a 7800x3d cpu doesn't hurt. But this guy also has a very powerful CPU, so he's just pushing it too hard for no reason.
You ruined it by keeping 32 chunks on, if u ran like 5-6 chunks with distant horizons the difference is almost unnoticeable and yet u can get like at least 150fps+. I got 160-180 on a 3060ti with 600 chunks and shaders On
Get your eyes checked if you don't see the ugly chunks on low render distance or buy something better than an i5 3570k and a 560 Ti so you can increase that shit
Is it just me or did the texture pack give the game a “ castle miner Z “ look? Just how gritty it looks perfectly encapsulates its experience minus the dragons aliens and demons lol.
Es impresionante la exigencia que tiene el Minecraft aún con esos componentes en su maquina sus FPS disminuyeron. Bien dicen que Java no es el mejor lenguaje de programación para jugar pero a pesar de eso se ven increíbles esas vistas realistas . Un saludo!
If minecraft wasnt so cpu bound itd run so much better, its not even using the gpu to the fullest. Then again realistically whos maxing the draw dist when playing, does look cool though. As a kid with my igpu i rem getting low fps in minecraft and sorta just dealing with it and got use to it, got a 4080 super now and a 7800x3d and now even heavily modded/shaded does a nice 240 fps at 1440p (with it capped to monitor specs) shame a lot of my childhood modpacks r like, gone. Might have to dig out some old hard drives and see if i can find em. Rip orespawn
What cooler do you have? Cause those some hot temps you should get a 360mm Arctic radiator they look pretty good and are one of the best if not the best
i dont think its runing 4k becouse de gpu its not 100% use, i think he has something wrong on the config, if you have more use of the cpu than the gpu…. no good
5800X3D -30 PBO and 6950 XT Merc on 2420MHz, 2130MHz fast timings +15% P/L runs it easily in 4k with pathtraced shaders and DH aggressive on 32 Render Distance, most minecraft players however seem to be in their teens and have no clue what they're doing. It's kind of a big surprise some of them get it to launch in the first place lol
@@dzudemlow Alright, do you have any tips on what to search to gain the knowledge you have? I would like to learn how to get more use out of my CPU and GPU.
nah, thats really low, because my 13700k melting on 95c, when i try to load 300 LOD, there is nothing in the description about cooling systems, can u tell it?@@JbuildsGaming
@@thetwitchywarlock I need to stop commenting under this vid, no lesser rigs can handle 32 RD easily if you're just a tad bit tech-savvy. And obviously I'm talking about DH + PT Shaders in 4k with 128-512x labPBR packs, not Vanilla.
Maybe I’m stupid, if someone is smarter with pcs than me do correct me..but those frames dropping from 800-500 when he had low render distance means he REALLY needs to tinker around and fix those frame consistencies does he not?
minecraft is a cpu demanding game, he doesn't have nvidium due to DH or shaders I think. the CPU is responsible in rendering all those chunks, and since he didn't turn down the render distance after enabled LODs the fps tanked
I run 16 render distance with 128 DH, and a 32x resource pack for a 3060 ti. If you use the 64x version of patrix I believe ur fps will double & you can certainly help ur PC with that 4080
What is your cpu doing that's causing you to have such a massive bottleneck even at 4k with shaders before you even start rendering LODs with dh? You should have been much closer to 60fps than you were for a lot of the video, especially at the end where you only have ~30% gpu utilisation.
everytime we have a new series of graphic cards doesnt matter if it was gtx 1080 ti or like this rtx 4080 shaders in mc will always bring them down to 40 fps
2014: Can your PC run minecraft?
2024: Can your PC run minecraft?
xdxd
Meu i911900k 2060 S deu mais fps que Pc dele 😊
@@cheveboy171 Meu 13900k 4090 deu mais fps jajaja
@@zeNUKEify aí sim
@@zeNUKEify problema pelo AMD ele usa no Minecraft não vai empurrar 4090 ultra com gráfico tem usar i9 ou AMD 7800x3d
The whole point of DH is that it lets you turn the render distance way DOWN to like 4 - 8 and get a long view distance
True I could’ve lowered my render distance for better performance
if you have an higher end pc and you can play with an higher actual render distance you shold do it. the higher is the distance of the switch between dh loaded chucks and chunck loaded for real the better it's gonna look overall.
@@alessandrogiavazzidiminishing returns my friend, even if your kitted out with 128gb of ddr5 ram and a Godly CPU, theres no point in investing all those resources into a long render distance when you cant notice the tiny details in the distance to begin with. If your using a high intensity pbr resourcepack with a ton of custom 3D models and animations then having your render distance too high could overload the GPU's memory in certain biomes like Jungle. (This is because of too many vertices in the models which takes up VRAM) If you wanted to get the best of both worlds *and* use a high intensity resourcepack with shaders then the DH+Iris+Bliss combo is currently the only thing that allows that right now. I do however agree that turning your render distance down to like 5 with DH+Iris looks icky, it should be atleast 10+ imo in order to look any good.
Hopefully as time goes by, it will get more stable and more shaderpack creators will update their packs to work with DH.
@@gavinferguson2938”My friend” your wrong. The switch from normal chunks to DH rendered chunks from 8 render distance is horrible. From 32 render distance almost seamless. If that’s diminishing returns then you’re blind.
@@DaltonAstbury opinions opinions
props to this guy for using distant horizons WITH max vanilla render distance
Just wait till the “how to build a modern house in Minecraft” population Hears about this
Definitely, lots of clueless people here say put it on 4-8 or some shit lol, like they've never seen the garbo LOD from DH. Unless you zoom in with a render distance of 32, you won't ever notice how bad it looks. With 4-8 you don't need to zoom in, it just looks like shit right in front of your eyes.
@@dzudemlow EXACTLY
i say at the very LEAST do like 12 or something, preferably 16
@@00Cubic Imho even 20 looks somewhat bad. 32 doesn't hurt with a decent rig honestly.
@@dzudemlow fr
GPU: nah i'd win
CPU: nah i'd lose
my phone: *exploded*
@@Bread011 but it is not highly optimised
@@Bread011pretty sure Minecraft is heavy single core performance and so the Intel 14900k would probably be better
Edit: Don't get Intel... or at least 13th and 14th generation since it has a lot of instability issues, AMD is the way to go
@@ightimmaheadout290 never said it wasn't? I just said that the 7950x3d is extremely strong
@@ightimmaheadout290cant mods just make it multi core reliant...
title should have been "Can a Ryzen 9 7950X3D", the 4080 didn't break 70% utilization
yeah your right minecraft is cpu based mostly unless he used nvidium which he didnt
@@SergeantNooob incorrect, using distance mod stores it to GPU memory.
@@Darkyahwehoh i was talking about vanilla with no mods
@@SergeantNooobthere is a way to have more threads of a cpu be used in minecraft it does help a little with fps
Hey bro how to download Minecraft java
This is the only game that im kinda proud of how badly it is optimized
@@DinduMuffin-x3c specs for minecraft is unavaible because it s not match with game
Minecraft does not benefit from a lot of cpu cores
The only unoptimized thing about this video is the guy changing the settings.
The 4080 is barely being used, meanwhile your CPU is maxed out. You need to get Sodium and NVidium to better balance that load
iris refuses to function without sodium, and nvidium isn't compatible with shaders
@tsl_roxyz it runs with iris but disables itself when shaders are enabled
@tsl_roxyzwrong!!!
you literally cant use these mods without sodium and nvidium your game just wont start
He is using sodium lol
Tip for anyone trying this yourself. you can (and maybe should) turn your vanilla render distance WAYY down after distant horizons is on for much better performance. you could turn it down as low as 4 if you wanted, but id recommend at least 8-12 or maybe even 16
It also doesnt load the RAM the way it should. Only 15 GB, but should be closer to 27 GB. He has some problem with his RAM.
@@spaceunicorn2023 Its VRAM, not RAM
@@markin_slava677 I think no. Minecraft cant use that much video memory.
@@spaceunicorn2023 In msi afterburner the "MEM" designation shows VRAM.
@@markin_slava677 hmm ok thank u
Lower your render distance, you have distant horizon to compensate for lower render distance, that's the whole point of it
Edit: Thanks for 100 likes, most I've ever gotten s comment
Also turn down the simulation distance and use nvidium
@@BoyWhoLikesMinecraftPvp Nvidium don't work with shaders.
@@13_cmi why souldnt it?
maybe I'm wrong, but if he lowers his render distance while using a texture pack, wouldn't the difference between DH lod and real world generation be way too noticiable? There would be a line where the blocks go from Patrix x128 to the distant horizon's fake blocks and it would probably stick out like a sore thumb
@@sk8_bort That's where the shaders enters, becasue of it, you can't really notices the difference between the real chunks and lod ones, except if you really pay attention to it.
this is a world I would want to live in
ikr
The texture pack is also so ugly
3:06 best one fore
All I need to play minecraft again is some ambiance like birds chirping and wind, distant horizons, small amount of shaders just nice looking water and light and leaves moving in the wind.
Just something to make the world feel more alive.
And some terrain mod like terralith or something.
Maybe something to add more cool biomes and small things to the game.
Exactly, and i need a good pc before all that
This is the road to hell, my friend. 😜 The dreaded "all I need" rabbit hole. All I need for mincraft is just some A,B,and C. And D, and maybe some E and F. Oooh, G looks nice, and H shouldn't be too bad....
Pretty soon you're out of alphabet and running 300+ mods. 😁
@@briansmith303 so a shader pack, a terrain mod and distant horizons = 300 mods?
Lol
@@Sqouty So you think a shader pack, a terrain mod and distant horizons gives you
"some ambiance like birds chirping and wind, distant horizons, small amount of shaders just nice looking water and light and leaves moving in the wind.
Just something to make the world feel more alive.
And some terrain mod like terralith or something.
Maybe something to add more cool biomes and small things to the game."
Lol.
"Just something to make the world feel more alive" could easily be 4 or 5 all by itself, not to even mention "add small things to the game". Besides, it doesn't start at 300; it's incremental creep. Everybody's different. It was a joke, not a challenge.
@@briansmith303 whatever not like I play minecrafz anymore anyway
You should look into other performance mods that can further increase FOS like Sodium and NVidium
what the fuck kinda term is fos mate
@@itzagonlol typo, but just interpret as “fart or shit?”
The RTX 4080 with those shaders make Minecraft look incredible!
Yeah I know looks incredible
Can my i7 12th gen Rtx 4050 run this?@@JbuildsGaming
U probably could, but this idiot didn’t put down his render distance even though distant horizons literal point is to do that
@@anitakumaripanigrahy587 laptop or desktop ?
I use these shaders and this texture on an RTX 2060 and it runs the same way as this one
Bliss shaders alone goes crazy af
Distant Horizons is too CPU bound that even 7950x3D struggles. I wish it was possible to make DH compatible with Nvidium for higher FPS
They're just not using the right settings.
Too many threads allocated and not using the graavl VM enterprise edition of Java lowers performance.
@@whatistruth_1graavel VM enterprise Java? Hol up, do java versions make that much of a difference?
@@whatistruth_1The what now?
@@gavinferguson2938 graalVM is an alternate java virtual machine ( a virtual environment where java code is compiled into java bytecode and then it is executed ) that adds a lot of optimizations and improves code execution performance significantly. By, default JVM ( java virtual machine ) is the default, which is very good at optimizing Java code and making it efficient, but its default garbage collection technique can cause performance drops, as it has pause the entire java process until the GC has been completed, graalVM improves that and a bunch other technical stuff.
@@gavinferguson2938yes, there are better versions of java that can make the game run better. mojang prebundles an old and poop version of java with their game, but in lots of launchers, you can point it to run off of a custom version of java if you have it installed. definitely look it up, i'm sure someone around has tested which ones are best for certain hardware combinations
Glad to see I’m not the only one with high DH cpu temps
this is the future of gaming. I can't wait to one day play this crazy version of minecraft in 120fps
you can he coulda done it right then and there in the video hes just stupid and doesnt know how to optimize the game to run that
All you need to do is download a shader loader, and texture packs, and some shaders. All of that is free but it might fry ur computer. Worth it tho😀
Bro is ready to help a bunch of dwarves fight a dragon that stole their treasure.
Phone:I envy you bro
PC:If only you knew what I'm going through
Try doing Max Render + Bliss Shaders + Patrix x128 + Distant Horizons + Terralith + Amplified world
I can try but it’ll give me like 10fps since distant horizon mod has bad performance and it relies on the cpu rather than gpu
Terra & ampli are also resources pack like Patrick?
Better than the MC Movie? whell, the cinema at least can run it XD 2:44
2:47 OHHH MYYYY PCCCCCCCCC
Awesome video. I started playing Minecraft only recently because of my daughter. And we're starting to make videos together too. I want to go down the rabbit hole of graphics mods. Currently sitting on a 3060, but considering a rebuild in the near future with 50 series around the corner.
That river view awesome
Video:👍
SONG:😍😍
What is song name
@@Illustragames let me know when you know
@@mkonlp4197C418 - Aria math 😊
We getting dlss 3.0 and framegen in minecraft with this one 🗣🔥🔥
5:18 This performance is only to take screenshots not to play with it 😂😂😂😂
Agreed ❤😂
Ngl, 7:18 I feel like I'm watching an establishing or panning shot from Lord Of The Rings
aria math is without a doubt my favorite song from the soundtrack
😭😭 beautiful amazing
Might I acquire the settings you used to make bliss look like this?
That's beautiful!
It’s actually less about the graphics card and more about your CPU, the cpu does the whole mod gen atleast. DH has shown me that my cpu thermal paste is not applied properly, has it overheat several times till I configurated everything perfectly. Once I get a new CPU I’ll also get better cooling and pay more attention to applying the paste.
"How do you want your steak to be cooked sir?"
Me: on my pc
I can't imagine if Minecraft wasn't a cube game like that🤩🥶
To me, the problem with these realistic mods is that they change the perception of size and scale. Things look larger with the realistic mod pack, which may visually break some builds.
Your pc is a beast bro
ohh man!! the scene was so enchanting that my heart skip a beat it was like a dream a sweet dream
geeze how does your computer handle that?? 😂 Stunning view!
This guy's computer should be running this MUCH better, but he left his full render distance maxed out at 32 chunks. Which is very counter productive with this mod.
And he also put 300 chunks for the DH mod, a bit overkill 😂. The CPU is being held hostage by rendering a billion chunks for the mod. Hence the aweful framerate.
I tried this out on my PC and I'm getting anywhere from 60-100 fps
Mod chunks set to 150, normal chunks set to 12. Mod quality at maximum.
Plus a 7800x3d cpu doesn't hurt. But this guy also has a very powerful CPU, so he's just pushing it too hard for no reason.
You ruined it by keeping 32 chunks on, if u ran like 5-6 chunks with distant horizons the difference is almost unnoticeable and yet u can get like at least 150fps+. I got 160-180 on a 3060ti with 600 chunks and shaders On
Yeah but he used max settings ray tracing seus ptgi e12 plus he did like 8192 chunks lod
Get your eyes checked if you don't see the ugly chunks on low render distance or buy something better than an i5 3570k and a 560 Ti so you can increase that shit
Is it just me or did the texture pack give the game a “ castle miner Z “ look? Just how gritty it looks perfectly encapsulates its experience minus the dragons aliens and demons lol.
Wow there’s a game a haven’t heard of in 10+ years! What a throw back!
جميييل 🎉❤😮
4:56 this scenery feels me like I'm standing infront of Norwegian or Scottish Sea
Very realistic 🌌
God that bird is fricken loud holy shit
Customer service: so which bada** game destroyed your pc?
You: hmm... Well.. my craft did
WOOOOW
The dream monn, this have me in aww 😍 Love it 🇻🇨🔥
Oh my PCCCCCCCCCCC
I thought.. "Now do it with a 64 pixel texture pack.... then a 128 pixel texture pack." and then you went straight past that.
Nice.
Es impresionante la exigencia que tiene el Minecraft aún con esos componentes en su maquina sus FPS disminuyeron.
Bien dicen que Java no es el mejor lenguaje de programación para jugar pero a pesar de eso se ven increíbles esas vistas realistas . Un saludo!
Yo i wish you can move the Grass like When you move at the Grass and they move that will be cool Dang Looks So Good
2:42 Top title is like: aaRRR
Now just add rain and a few mobs 😏 btw 14900k survived this strength test ? 🤭
This looks so crazy
I just love Minecraft.
2:06 i got same results with fps mods and a 6gb 3050 laptop
Then i guess ur game looks like shit
U can laptop 6gb rtx 3050?
@@Eza_XD yeah
He is running the game on 4k lol 😂
@@xMN__ ik but i am using a 3050
I have Minecraft 1.12.2 at 60 FPS and it goes down to 5 and often goes down to 20, I can only dream of such levels as yours
omg i have never seen the LODs load that fast before
The first shader reminds me of summer with friends in childhood, this tabletop appeared
Wow ta un pc de la nasa pour faire tourner minecraft ultra réaliste 🤩
Here is a tip go into video settings and turn Minimap levels to 4 and the it will look less blurry
Así si vuelvo a jugar minecraft ❤
Crazy that my 3060 in my laptop was getting close to the same results in performance
If minecraft wasnt so cpu bound itd run so much better, its not even using the gpu to the fullest. Then again realistically whos maxing the draw dist when playing, does look cool though. As a kid with my igpu i rem getting low fps in minecraft and sorta just dealing with it and got use to it, got a 4080 super now and a 7800x3d and now even heavily modded/shaded does a nice 240 fps at 1440p (with it capped to monitor specs) shame a lot of my childhood modpacks r like, gone. Might have to dig out some old hard drives and see if i can find em. Rip orespawn
U should also add terralith + tectonic and max out shaders and render distance
Honestly im kinda curious if lossless scaling (the app) could make it feel more smooth
You'd need to play with a controller prob though
2000s: can it run crysis
2020s: can it run minecraft 💀
CPU: What are you doing?
GPU: Please help me! 💀
Playing Minecraft with RTX 4090 is my dream ❤ . Nothing is equal with Minecraft graphics. (In every game)
Bro c'mon that's only Minecraft a 200mb game
The Minecraft:
What cooler do you have? Cause those some hot temps you should get a 360mm Arctic radiator they look pretty good and are one of the best if not the best
Song name: Aria Math C418
ariameth
I think i’ll just wait for a quantum laptop😂
“ULTRA REALISTIC” is being ridiculously generous.
Bro's CPU is struggling to survive a complete total meltdown annihilation
If I do the same thing with my computer. I can make a toast with it.
The Best Vanilla Shader+ Max Render+ Bliss Shader😩😩😩
Underrated
*OH MY PC
*OH MY PC
*OH MY PC
Oooohhh mmmyyyy ppcc🗣️🗣️👾
Now a modpack with this and some fun quests
people are missing the point which he's also running in 4k, which is an instant killer in mc high settings for any gpu
Plus the fps counter app takes load of cpu stress
i dont think its runing 4k becouse de gpu its not 100% use, i think he has something wrong on the config, if you have more use of the cpu than the gpu…. no good
5800X3D -30 PBO and 6950 XT Merc on 2420MHz, 2130MHz fast timings +15% P/L runs it easily in 4k with pathtraced shaders and DH aggressive on 32 Render Distance, most minecraft players however seem to be in their teens and have no clue what they're doing. It's kind of a big surprise some of them get it to launch in the first place lol
@@dzudemlow Alright, do you have any tips on what to search to gain the knowledge you have? I would like to learn how to get more use out of my CPU and GPU.
what AIO for CPU do you use? 84C sounds impressive in this scene, or u just lock temp?
No the thing is distant horizon relies heavily on cpu that’s why it’s so high. Specs are in description
nah, thats really low, because my 13700k melting on 95c, when i try to load 300 LOD, there is nothing in the description about cooling systems, can u tell it?@@JbuildsGaming
@@baka6598 Intel runs super hot compared to amd. Generally I prefer deepcool coolers but those temps are normal.
Pc : idon't feel so good... HOOOOOOHOOOHOOOOO
I think i would live on minecraft if it looked like that lol
the gap between a 4080 and a 4090 is insane im getting 100+fps with the same settings and 512 DH lod render
It’s basically twice the power of a 4080, next goal is to get one
@@JbuildsGaming No, its only around 30% better
Probably because this guy left the vanilla render distance at maximum
@@thetwitchywarlock I need to stop commenting under this vid, no lesser rigs can handle 32 RD easily if you're just a tad bit tech-savvy. And obviously I'm talking about DH + PT Shaders in 4k with 128-512x labPBR packs, not Vanilla.
@@dzudemlow okay?
I cant unhear the schlatt remix of the minecraft music
Maybe I’m stupid, if someone is smarter with pcs than me do correct me..but those frames dropping from 800-500 when he had low render distance means he REALLY needs to tinker around and fix those frame consistencies does he not?
Can you make a tutorial of the house? I really liked it
Why the cpu usage more than gpu? Is it because of rams or something?
Doesn’t look like 7950x3d to me either
minecraft is a cpu demanding game, he doesn't have nvidium due to DH or shaders I think. the CPU is responsible in rendering all those chunks, and since he didn't turn down the render distance after enabled LODs the fps tanked
minecraft if cpu based
I run 16 render distance with 128 DH, and a 32x resource pack for a 3060 ti. If you use the 64x version of patrix I believe ur fps will double & you can certainly help ur PC with that 4080
this is minecraft graphics community at its peak
enough to make someone cry
What is your cpu doing that's causing you to have such a massive bottleneck even at 4k with shaders before you even start rendering LODs with dh? You should have been much closer to 60fps than you were for a lot of the video, especially at the end where you only have ~30% gpu utilisation.
I think that could be caused by me using the afterburner fps counter as well as recording on obs in 4k
I'm more interested in you House/base. I'm definitely making one for myself lol.
Я: Когда я соберу топовый комп я буду играть в требовательные игры как в CyberPank, Metro.
Я когда собрал пк:
Bro is cooking eggs on his pc
everytime we have a new series of graphic cards doesnt matter if it was gtx 1080 ti or like this rtx 4080 shaders in mc will always bring them down to 40 fps