Ben Shapiro Actually Takes a Political Compass Test - It's Bad.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- Website - www.vaush.gg/
Twitter - / vaushv
Patreon - / vaush
Donate - www.paypal.me/...
Intro animation credit goes to / itismekyleg & / honeybunnbadger for the visuals, and / sound_sierra for the audio! Thank you!
Ben's only issue with "trans-national corporations" is that they're trans in some way
I love this comment 💀
Lmao
@Harry Mackle I like Ben but what you said is hilarious
OpinionatedRichard Head lol can we get more people like you?
@@rjvanvalkenburgh at least you're somewhat open-minded...
The survey questions won this debate
“Political Compass Survey DESTROYS, no ONLITERATED Ben Shapiro”
32:13 can you conclude what is meant by “own kind” by the question alone? Im sorry but the survey questions are indeed vague. own kind can mean everything from a value community to a race. Bens critic is actually well found.
@@Brien831 It's race. When you look at the way the question is phrased, it's pretty easy to figure out what it means.
ProgPro96 why doesnt it state race then, or rather why is the question not : “do you think segregation is good?” i believe that would ask the same thing and much more clearly at that
@@Brien831 Because not everyone who thinks people should "stick to their own kind" would vote yes on "do you think segregation is good?"
“Is it okay to use the n-word? The very phraseology of that question is meant to illicit a reaction from the left and get me in trouble. I will answer the question phrased like this-is it okay to use the n-word in a derogatory manner to black people? Well in that case I’m going to have to strongly agree.”
LMAOOOOSKDDJSKJD
Benjamin Munson that shit was hilarious
NO CAP
LMAOOO
Based
That pornography question would have been a no brainer for an ACTUAL libertarian.
You can be economically libertarian and socially conservative. That's generally what's going on.
Damien Rafalowski so in other words. Not a libertarian. Everyone is allowed to have their own thoughts and opinions but if he is socially conservative to the point where he fundamentally disagrees with libertarian viewpoints he isnt a libertarian.
Libertarian is a social stance...
@@jebbush4godemperor285 It's a political ideology with social and economic positions. They just are libertarian economically.
@@we2beballin2k That is literally what it is. Not saying it is good or bad, but factually, people are more or less along the spectrum of an ideology. You can be socially liberal and economically conservative or economically conservative and socially liberal, etc. Reality isn't black and white absolute ideological purity.
"This test is obviously a secret leftist."
It's known that this test is biased towards lib-left
@@eoin8450 How do you figure? It presents you with certain political positions, it assigns you to a spot based on how strongly you relate to those positions. It is using improper definitions for "authoritarian", "libertarian", "liberal", or "conservative" that were skewed by the developers' left-leaning beliefs?
I think the test is slightly "biased" towards libleft, yes, but the questions are just fine.
It's just because there aren't enough specific questions.
e n most people hold Lib left views and they just don’t know it. Lib left is common sense. It’s conservatism that has an anti reality bias and politicises common sense issues like “should we let poor people have healthcare?”
@@eoin8450 What does that mean? That it puts people more lib left than someone else thinks, or that it puts people more auth right than someone else thinks (because they start from a place of lib left which throws things off)?
As for people saying "the questions are skewed": they aren't questions - they are statements - and of course they are skewed, that's how they get agreement and disagreement.
Ben's poor wife: "What do you want for din--"
Ben: "THE VERY PHRASIOLOGY..."
Ben to his wife: "The vaguery of the statement "what do you want for dinner" makes me think that you're actually attempting to trick me into answering a dishonest question."
LMAOOOO
I think you're forgetting that she's a doctor
@Praise ‘Bob’ OMG!!
OMFG I CANT BELIEVE HE SAID PHRASEOLOGY. 😂 SO FUNNY HES SO STUPID
he literally tried to "DEBATE ME!!!" an online test
When you debate only low hanging fruit college students, seeing any other forms of dialogue exchange will come off as a debate. He treated Andrew Neil's interview of him as a debate. If he were to debate anyone other than a college student, Ben would be on suicide watch.
@@ZXD7250 he'd probably think that a normal conversation is a debate
@@ZXD7250 well other than students, he did debate Cenk Uyghur. But that's about it. Pretty embarrassing as far as resumes are concerned.
“It’s so unfair that this compass puts Hitler and Thatcher in the same category! Now excuse me while I compare transgender rights activism to Mao’s Cultural Revolution.”
I know! It’s crazy! Now let me compare Stalin to putting women in video games.
Hold on, lemme describe anything to the left of status quo capitalism as a fascist pipeline
Ben is so fucking cringe
Thatcher was an evil bitch
he compared maos cultural revolution to the blm protesters
Ben: the prime point of schooling is to teach kids how to get a job. Yeah, moral teaching should be left to the parents.
Also Ben: it is important that my child's school instills religious values. Strongly agree.
Isn't it obvious? He wants all children to be employed as Rabis
The point of MANDATED schooling. His view is consistent
@@eahere are you saying that Ben Shapiro meant compulsory education does or should only teach one how to get a job and that the aspect of religious schooling should only be introduced in further education?
@False Feathers How does if he pays for it or not change whether they should have moral teaching or not? Or am I misunderstanding what you were vaguely referring to?
i hate ben
From the future: Ben is afraid of porn because it contains WAP
And because there’s taller masculine men
LMAO!!!!!!!!
Wet as p word
Unless its gay porn lol
Pet ass p word
Ben: takes a *political* compass test. Also Ben: complains that there are *political* questions
LOL
😂😂😂🤣🤣
The fact that he takes issue with getting a reaction out of the left-leaning statements is utterly ridiculous. All of these statements appeal to all sorts of sides, if he stopped and looked for two seconds. His training his attention to left-leaning positions and pointing it out to his audience makes him look like the partisan hack that he is. He's an embarrassing case study of confirmation bias. Also, has he only heard of the Likert Scale, like, in this decade?? That's how the scale works. That's how the statements are made. Just fucken answer them, you dipshit
@@gian3458 The one I took in 1988 was a seven point likert scale. 3 up, 3 down, and 1 neutral. I saw myself as a Lincoln/Teddy Republican. It was my 3rd year in the Army and after answering over 100 questions I rated on the Left. Yeah, I was taken back but when I look at what I thought things should be did in fact line up with the Left as well as the GOP was not the party of Lincoln nor Teddy anymore. It was about big business while giving lip service to the little guy it was fucking.
I think it is more or less when he reads the question the right leaning solution does not sound so appealing hence he has to demonize the left position constantly so he can ignore the fucked up issues with his own beliefs.
@@DevinMacGregor facts
Ben Sharpie needs to stop claiming he's a libertarian because he is clearly not
clearly a radical right winger
He is though
@@carson_koch3539 yes but he says "I.am a libertanian" even tho he's views are authoritanian right
SomeGuy45' Generally on most of his views he is a libertarian. For example, on the legalization of weed, same sex marriage, etc. his view is libertarian, and he believes that people should be able to do whatever they please as long as they don’t the lives of other people in danger. Abortion is where his views lean more towards the authoritarian right, because abortion is something that involves the lives of other people including their own.
@@carson_koch3539 lol no he's generally a radical right supports isreal zionist which is a radical right wing movement , racist and homophobic
installs religious values in school but supports home schooling ,support spying on people because of "terrorism" ....
basically he's authoritarian right and the cherry on top blames the fucking website as "leftist propoganda" bruh
Imagine thinking a political compass test is out to get you.
It’s not but still most people agree that this test isn’t very good or accurate- the questioning definitely is more biased to the left though not to the degree Ben suggests
@@aidan6521 How can it be biased? It's going to unfairly place people further left?
But actually what does that mean, politically wise?
@@Suth1172 It makes the left wing positions sound more reasonable, because they are.
It's not "out to get" anyone, but like all these short and sloppy internet tests, it's not very accurate.
That's why there are over 600 questions on the MMPI test, it allows for more accuracy.
It was created by leftists for leftists, so if you're Ben Shapiro, it is.
Has Ben Shapiro never heard of the word "phrasing" before? It sounds a lot less dumb than phraseology
So, we're just done with phrasing now, right? That's just not a thing anymore? -Archer
@Rudol Von Stroheim It is a word, but it's the wrong word, he's not talking about the study of the phrasing of the question, he's just talking about the phrasing of the word itself. But Big Brain thinks extra syllables = intelligence.
Im really confused why this is a problem, the word exists and he used it properly this argument just feels like a personal dig.
@@ichabaudcraine2923 No just because it has the root ology doesnt mean its the study of anything.
@@stealthyfang3660 It's revealing because he thinks it makes him sound smarter than he is, that's what people find funny. No, it's not the worst thing he's done and probably shouldn't be the main focus. But it's just fucking funny.
Ben Shapiro goes from losing an interview to losing a personality quiz
You need one to pass
fucks sake, Ben Shapiro is the kind of guy who could actually fail an IQ test.
@@SuperGorak he would study for a covid test but not a regular one lmao
@@SuperGorak I think taking this test in such a dishonest way he proved that he's just manipulative and cold blooded, not necessarily too dumb to get it.
@@acegikm dishonest?
"I am obviously a right-libertarian" - is pro military and pro police
colton lacamu Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. Shapiro is so libertarian he wants the state to interfere with women’s bodily autonomy.
Being Pro-Police is a problem too?
If you think the police and the military shouldn’t exist you are dumb.
Nickyb 123 Yeah maybe but that’s kinda what it means to be libertarian, so Ben being upset that he isn’t one is entirely unjustifiable. Also having an American flag for an avatar is just cringe, bro.
Matthew Kossolapov or most of his views could align with the views of the average libertarian. Just because you disagree with some views doesn’t completely rule you out of that political party.
"International law is based on the biases of the countries that wrote it, as opposed to US laws, which is objectively true, always."
Sure, international law is just some random BS other countries try to impose on you in which the actual parties to it have no say whatsoever, didn't you know?
Damn, I wonder if Sharpie Boy is really too stupid to realize that this exact 'argument' would just as easily invalidate the US Constitution or if he would unironically commit to the idea that the Founding Fathers got their stuff dictated to them on Mt. Rushmore or sth...
@@yurona5155 you mean mt Sinai?
but only the republican ones
@@paulkeeney9839 Sure, Mt. Rushmore was just meant as an adaptation to this specific context, i.e. consider it me having taken some 'artistic license'. :)
P.S. Turns out Sharpie indeed has argued along very similar lines. Damn, is this stupid, f-in kill me! Maybe it's really time to wrap things up now and consider humankind a failed project...
He is not claiming US law is always right that's why he said NO to 'supporting his country whether it was right or wrong'.
I love how far authoritarian he comes out despite touting himself as a libertarian
Not to mention that he answered some of them pretty dishonestly
That's the thing though, libertarianism in the US is so far removed from its meaning that it's just a way of closeting them as the fascists they are. Case in point with Ben Shitpiro
Alonso Arana what a stupid comment.
He thinks corporations should have the LIBERTY to tell people what to do. You see, it's not authoritarian because it's about LIBERTY.
lmao on the very first question
I've never seen a man struggle so hard on deciding the legality of porn my god
Obvious yes
"Well, you see, it's immoral and degrading our society, but it shouldn't be up to the government to legislate morality, we should leave it up to the free market to decide whether people taking photos of their buttholes has worth to our society because, you see, if somebody pays for it then it clearly must have some redeemable worth and therefore must be ON SOME LEVEL be moral. Allowing it, I suppose, is a necessary evil as long as the market is willing to give it value."
It should be banned , at least for kids up until their 18. Also fast food, and widestream social media because it exarcebates loneliness and its dangerous for kids. It is not effective to rely on responsible parents
@@littleteapot7331 Why should it be banned? For all three, if you care to answer
Dokkisse I have a personal bias against porn because i discovered it at a 10 years of age and I felt like that made me lose interest in people who were the same age as me. I would watch porn around 2 or 3 times a week and when I tried to stop, I couldnt. I felt like it was weird to have a crush classmates , because then when I come home from school Im watching some mature adult having sex and I think its the most hottest thing ever. I wish I never saw porn because I feel like it was a “spoiler” of what life would be later on. I feel like I want to protect other younger kids from porn because I feel like it would improve their quality of life, because I feel like porn can take that spice away. Although I do think porn could be harmful to everyone, I focus on kids because I think they are the most vulnerable to porn. Peer pressure can be hard for kids to resist, and curiosity can be tempting for a kid. Addiction is also harder for a kid to fight.
I also extend the same 18+ rule to social media because kids can fall victim to certain stuff if not supervised. For example predators, bullies, they may watch other graphic content. Just like my experience with porn, I think social media use can increase anti socialness and can be addictive.
As for junk food, when I hear of childhood obesity increasing, I think we need an intervention. A lot of people advertise to kids to encourage consumption unhealthy food, which I think is not fair. I think its not fair because kids do not have the ability to resist several marketing attempts. I also think that kids who become unhealthy as a result of junk food, end up regretting it when its too late. As a result, I consider them victims. I think that its becoming harder for parents to protect their kids against junk food, when kids are like walking money machines to advertisers, who will continue to develop ways to make kids consume or to keep their interest.
Timestamps for anyone interested:
1:01 - If economic globalization is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations
4:08 - I'd always support my country whether, it was right or wrong
4:21 - No one chooses his or her country of birth, so it's foolish to be proud of it
4:54 - Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races
5:17 - The enemy of my enemy is my friend
5:33 - Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified
6:34 - There is now a worrying fusion of information and entertainment
9:44 - People are ultimately divided more by class than by nationality
10:47 - Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment
11:33 - Because corporations cannot be trusted to voluntarily protect the environment, they require regulation
12:12 - "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need, is fundamentally a good idea
12:41 - It's a sad reflection on our society that something as basic as drinking water is now a bottled, branded consumer product
13:24 - Land shouldn't be a commodity to be bought and sold
14:11 - It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society
15:28 - Protectionism is sometimes necessary in trade
16:35 - The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders
16:51 - The rich are too highly taxed
17:49 - Those with the ability to pay should have access to higher standards of medical care
20:56 - Governments should penalize businesses that mislead the public
21:53 - A genuine free market requires restrictions on the ability of predator multinationals to create monopolies
26:55 - The freer the market, the freer the people
27:05 - Abortion, when the woman's life is not threatened, should always be illegal
27:17 - All authority should be questioned
27:24 - An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth
27:58 - Taxpayers should not be expected to prop up any theaters or museums that cannot survive on a commercial basis
29:19 - Schools should not make classroom attendance compulsory
31:42 - All people have their rights, but it is better for all of us that different sorts of people should keep to their own kind
34:01 - Good parents sometimes have to spank their children
34:37 - It's natural for children to keep some secrets from their parents
36:04 - Possessing marijuana for personal use should not be a criminal offence
36:30 - The prime function of schooling should be to equip the future generation to find jobs
37:45 - People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce
37:55 - The most important thing for children to learn is to accept discipline
42:12 - There are no savage and civilized peoples; there are only different cultures
46:26 - Those who are able to work, and refuse the opportunity, should not expect society's support
47:07 - When you are troubled, it's better to not think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things
48:34 - First-generation immigrants can never be fully integrated within their new country
48:59 - What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us
49:53 - No broadcasting institution, however independent its content, should receive public funding
51:20 - Our civil liberties are being excessively curbed in the name of counter-terrorism
52:25 - A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system
52:49 - Although the electronic age makes official surveillance easier, only wrongdoers need to be worried
53:06 - The death penalty should be an option for the most serious crimes
53:12 - In a civilized society, one must always have people above to be obeyed and people below to be commanded
54:17 - Abstract art that doesn't represent anything shouldn't be considered art at all
57:40 - In criminal justice, punishment should be more important than rehabilitation
59:41 - It is a waste of time to try to rehabilitate some criminals
1:03:14 - The businessperson and the manufacturer are more important than the writer and the artist
1:03:53 - Mothers may have careers, but their first duty is to be homemakers
1:06:18 - Multinational companies are unethically exploiting the plant genetic resources of developing countries
1:06:50 - Making peace with the establishment is an important aspect of maturity
1:06:57 - Astrology accurately explains many things
1:07:20 - You cannot be moral without being religious
1:07:34 - Charity is better than social security as a means of helping the genuinely disadvantaged
1:08:10 - Some people are naturally unlucky
1:08:58 - It is important that my child's school instills religious values
1:09:28 - Sex outside marriage is usually immoral
1:09:53 - A same sex couple in a stable, loving relationship should not be excluded from the possibility of child adoption
1:12:12 - Pornography, depicting consenting adults, should be legal for the adult population
1:13:37 - What goes on in a private bedroom between consenting adults is no business of the state
1:13:53 - No one can feel naturally homosexual
1:15:13 - These days openness about sex has gone too far
You’re an actual god
thank you i love you
You dropped this king, queen, or enby monarch 👑
Respect
Thank You
It's hilarious that he thinks making 50k to 60k a year is considered "poor."
Well it certainly is in some states. 50-60k in Illinois is barely decent.
to me it just seemed like he didn't consider that to be wealthy.
16:50 Ben didn't say 50k per year is poor; his argument is that he thought rich people were too highly taxed before he was rich. 50k isn't poor, but it's also not rich.
that's nothing
He never said it was poor, but it certainly isn’t rich
Ben "let's ignore climate change, just sell your house" Shapiro.
To this day, I still don't think that's nearly as ridiculous a statement as people make it out to be.
@@andrewprahst2529 sell your house to who?
PenPlayz People who want a cheaper house at the expense of it being less convenient.
SuperNovaNF I would buy a house that's half underwater if it was virtually free. It's free lumber at the very least.
I understand that at a certain point the houses will be considered condemned by the government and it will be illegal to sell them or whatever, but before it gets to that point, there will be plenty of time for the house to be sold and bought resold and rebought again for lower and lower prices. By the time the house is considered unsafe for living by the government, the person living there will barely care since they got the house for so little money anyway.
jibraan123100 Let me be clear: no person who is currently owning a completely fine house is going to suddenly be pushed out of their house. When they bought that house, they'll buy it knowing, "hey it's a kinda close to the water" then the next person who buys it might see it slightly closer and slightly closer, then someone will have to note that sometimes the basement gets wet when there's a lot of rain, then the next person who buys will note that the the basement gets wet when there's just a little rain, and each buyer will be paying less and less because it's less and less convenient.
Yes, long term, this will disrupt cities and require some mass location, but if you honestly think that a single person is going to find themself underwater, out of nowhere, within the span of his own lifetime, you're mistaken.
According to Ben's logic, the interests of tobacco companies are aligned with the interests of humanity.
how so
Oasis Technologies he said that that he thought that the interest of companies are aligned with interest of humanity
Well yeah, sure cigarettes will kill you, but the company creates jobs and that's all that matters!
lol libberals you stupud idiots it strengthens your lungs! lung cancer whats that?
never got those "corporations are people" type people
💀
I’m a libertarian, and vaush basically summarized my main gripe with the current libertarian climate that seems totally okay with tyranny as long as it comes from the private sector.
?
It seems most libertarians are okay with corporate tryanny and police brutality..... either that or they're ancaps
i used to self identify as libertarian but honestly it just doesn't mean anything anymore so i tend to not
You could always call yourself a left libertarian and quote the paradox of tolerance all over the place
@@euc5957 lmao nawh I'm good
It is hard for a man to understand something when his pay is based on not understanding it
Intellectual dishonesty at its finest.
Why does everyone hate on him for being good at his job? Its what his education prepared him for.
Capitalism is a meritocracy, they said. The more objectively valuable you are, the more money you'll have, they said.
@@jackhiggins3936 to answer your question, allow me to paraphrase it for you. "Why does everyone hate the pinkertons, they're only doing their job."
If that was a comment on Ben not understanding something, then it doesn't even make sense. It could be applied to LITERALLY ANYONE who makes money from their opinions. Vaush probably makes money on this channel, and so he is paid to "not understand" Ben's point of view with this video. Anyone who makes money from their opinions, regardless of that opinion's popularity, probably doesn't understand the opposing perspective. You know why? Because no one person can have all of the knowledge in all situations, and so their opinions are based on knowing, AND not knowing things. So if you want to use this as an argument against Ben, be prepared to have it used against a LOT of other people.
You: “wording”
Me, an intellectual: “PHRASEOLOGY”
The funny thing is, he isn't even using it correctly. "Phrasing" would've suited him much better in this situation, but he's so obsessed with looking smart that he feels the need to use big words he doesn't understand.
Phrasing!
Wording refers to specific wording while phraseology refers to how to question was formulated. They are not accurately inexchangeable.
Lol
@@orando191 is this a meme?
"This quiz is socialist propaganda, the question make no sense and even asking them lowers the IQ of the room. Also I disagree." You notice how he poisons the well before off-handedly dismissing the question.
@fatty bulger I can't see the picture, what does it say? too small for me, can't see the dot
@@Mhinqa I agree. A lot of these questions were biased and even ambiguous. I mean I took the test and answered in the way I interperated the questions (including interpreting the question about mandatory schooling as being an anti homeschool proposition) and got demsoc so 🤷♀️ doesnt seem that i needed "media training" to get what I more or less aligned with anyways.
@fatty bulger Bro stop leaving dumbass comments on this channel no one likes them
I do not agree that this is leftist propaganda, but it is biased and flawed. Also, how?
@@Mhinqa Mhin'qa it portrays this idea that some people are "naturally" predisposed to have shitty lives. If you agree, you're basically saying the disgrace that falls on certain people doesn't have to do with material conditions or biases in society (like racism, sexism, classism, etc.), but their "natural" defect. You can tie it with phrenology, for example, or the IQ-is-inherent-to-race thing
Unrelated but Ben Shapiro is a gay power bottom tell me I’m wrong
But in denial
Ur not wrong
Oh he definitely is
so true though
I mean, he seems to think wet pussy is unnatural so...
the fact that Ben Shapiro thinks he's libertarian is very weird to me
And why is that
do you think he has anything more than a basic understanding about anything?
Łukasz Szymanski American libertarianism is for far removed from what libertarianism actually is
Every slightly woke right winger thinks they are libertarian because it's the only way to make their economic liberalism sound cool by assisting it with 'freedom'
Every slightly woke right winger thinks they are libertarian because it's the only way to make their economic liberalism sound cool by assisting it with 'freedom'
Benny “this is obviously leftist” Shapiro
Lol
*Literally the paragraph that appears before taking the test:*
Please note that this isn’t a survey, and these aren’t questions. They’re propositions. To question the logic of individual ones that irritate you is to miss the point. Some propositions are extreme, and some are moderate. That’s how we can show you whether you lean towards extremism or moderation on the Compass. Your responses should not be overthought. Some of them are intentionally vague. Their purpose is to trigger reactions in the mind, measuring feelings and prejudices rather than detailed opinions on policy."
Fuckin Ben.
How does he expect a political compass test to gauge your political opinions without presenting political ideas?
Ben "feelings before facts" Shapiro
Could not contain his 14 year old faux ancap angst long enough to engage with a remedial Phillips Curve question/thought experiment...
JOHN GR can u source where Cuba has better doctors for me please and why
Nersius can u source me as to why Cuba has better doctors
@@Yoshsterpalooza www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/5/08-030508/en/
@@Yoshsterpalooza Lol why are you hitting up random people asking them to prove something they never brought up.
I just can’t with Ben’s voice. Old Alvin and the Chipmunks head-ass.
i always think the audio is like sped up since it’s so high pitched
Shapiro is what happened if Mandark from Dexter's Lab failed out of mad science and became a pundit
Jack Charlotte I literally died reading that lol
LMAO CHILE PLSSS
don’t do alvin like that
capitalists: we keep most of the money because we take the risks
capitalists 2020: we have no money after 1 month without workers, pls help us govern
And the workers are also fired after 1 month meaning the workers needed the captialist as much as the other way around. Besides, it doesn't change the fact that most capitalists struggled for years to get a successful business running without any profit. I don't see any workers doing that. Actually maybe a bunch of workers can try and start up a business like a CO-OP which Vaush loves talking about.
Also, this is a pandemic which means the entire economy is suffering. Also, how would this not be different in a marxist economy?
@@tharunthiruseelan4252 because the business would be THE government, they wouldn't be begging for help after treating the workers as worthless and replaceable a month before
Tiagorpg mendes They tried that already a few times,it ended in dictatorship and collapse almost always.
@@stefankazimirovic7957 because they skiped the part of the proccess where you give the power to the workers, you know, just the main part of the system
@@tiagodarkpeasant How would you give power to the workers exactly?
"It's nearly impossible for a modern monopoly to exist now"
You're kidding...
...Disney doesn't russle any feathers, ring any bells?
Disney, GM, Nestlé, Google, UA-cam... just to name a few
What does Disney have a monopoly over?
@@tylertone2776 animation industry
@@mustacheman4476 UA-cam is owned by alphabet Inc AKA google. Disney isnt a monopoly.
Look up Hydro Quebec here in Canada. True monopoly over electricity.
Ben Shapiro: "I'm pro life, but anti-humanity."
When 1month fetus dies: Think of the children!!!!! poor people starve to death: epic 😎
These people have got to go.
Wouldn't want any babies to miss out on the poverty!
Omg perfect!
“I’m pro human but anti baby” leftists
why is ben getting so triggered he can simply disagree with a statement that’s the whole point of the test 💀
Mayhaps bc deep down he knows he believes things that r morally wrong but still wants to live in ignorance bc it's easier for him
Dandelionweekes he tryna get that dinero
he has to make everything a debate i guess
you have a aesthetic power puff girls pfp shut up
@@jackaroni9475 laff
Did he not read the paragraph before the questions? It reads:
Before taking the test: Please note that this isn’t a survey, and these aren’t questions. They’re propositions. To question the logic of individual ones that irritate you is to miss the point. Some propositions are extreme, and some are moderate. That’s how we can show you whether you lean towards extremism or moderation on the Compass. Your responses should not be overthought. Some of them are intentionally vague. Their purpose is to trigger reactions in the mind, measuring feelings and prejudices rather than detailed opinions on policy.
lets be honest: nobody reads directions (that doesn't make Ben NOT an idiot tho)
@@nolol135 Agreed for the most part. But I think the point was that that ads another layer of stupid to his already monumentally huge achievements in that field.
I blatantly copied & pasted this into Ben Shapiro's video. Apologies.
Proving that both the political compass is both biased and flawed, and that the guy reviewing doesn't care either.
Reactionaries don't read.
Ben: Free market capitalism is based on the betterment of humanity and lifts millions out of poverty.
Kids in sweatshops: *Am I a joke to you?*
That's better than just having everyone starve to death.
Clyve Hm do you even know what sweatshops are? Lack of food and malnutrition is very common among people working there, and plus justifying an exploitative system just by saying that it’s better than systems in the past is exactly the same argument that the loyalists would make back in the American Revolution. They would’ve said, “Why do you want to revolt against the Empire? Most people eat and most people read, this isn’t an issue and you should just stop complaining.” It was a weak argument back then and it’s one today too.
ScepticalCynic exactly! And most people are oblivious to the fact that the only reason jobs are tolerable these days is due to the leftists and progressives of the past demanding better wages and safer working conditions for all workers. It wasn’t the free market who gave them these things, it was the workers standing up in unity for their common interests and a lot of them even paid with their lives when the Pinkertons came and started gunning them down.
That’s only in communist nations like china welcome to the United States
Sean Arya that is factually incorrect. It happens a lot in developing African countries and in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia and to some extent in Latin American countries but not so much anymore. And the majority of the corporations exploiting the workers of these developing nations are American. Also “Communist China,” sure the great communist Xijinping with his cabal of corporate billionaires, yeah they’re real commies aren’t they.
"Libertarian". Ah yes, VERY libertarian! Just like "I'd rather live in a catholic monarchy than a liberal democracy" Libertyhangouts. Just astounding.
The Libertarian party doesn't take liberty hangout seriously. They just think they are a giant joke. I prefer BeingLibertarian.com.
@@MJMazzarone Oh I know, I'm just being sarcastic. I'm already aware LH is faking being Libertarian.
Most monarchy’s are democracy’s
@@user-zw8vd6qy3c id argue that constitutional monarchy isnt monarchy
its just a republic with a figurehead ruler
Does he not realize that “abstract art” also includes a lot of classical music? like the shit he plays on his violin?
Yeah but music actually has substance. A blank canvas is well... Nothing.
@Yaboi LilDepresso I hate that logic because then fucking everything is abstract. I could show you a fucking random leaf I picked up off the ground and it would be considered art.
@@clarkfitzgerald8814 yes it can, art is the meaning that we give it. If you take the leaf and present it as art it's art. But people don't need to be impressed with your art either. Just cause it's art dosn't mean it had to be hard to create.
Clark FitzGerald yes everything can be abstract it’s just based on your perception of stuff
@PumpkinKitsune Ok sure, but it's stupid
Ben "I'm just going to assume their premise is wrong" Shapiro
That is what a lot of people in this comments think, including this guy.
Did he just fail a test on the topic of himself?
It's funny because it's true 😆
It's about political axes, not himself. Your understanding is poor.
@@orando191 that doesn't contradict anything I said but k
I don't think benny boi even understands what "all authority should be questionned" actually means
“Question authority, except God, the ultimate authority.”
"Never question who owns land, unless a Palestinian owns it"
Considering you didn't bother to punctuate your sentence I'm not sure you even understand past Grade 2 English.
@@orando191 says the guy who cannot comprehend what a coma is
Orlando Bell Bray
Imagine talking about grammar on the internet in current year. Go away, nerd.
Hot take: I think he's a religious fanatic, not necessarily a fascist.
Yup he’s a theocrat, his entire politics is constituted by his weird religious hang ups
this is true
I disagree he doesnt use religion in his arguments as he recognizes that arguments based on religion are weak to outsiders who dont belive in that religion.
@@stealthyfang3660
Yes, but he doesn't base his opinions on secular means. He bases them on religion. The secular reasoning comes after as a way to convince others.
Whats the difference?
I'm not a fan of this particular political test. The concept is good, but the questions and rating are really bad. It's almost impossible to come out on the authoritarian side unless you're a literal fascist. And it fails to classify tankies in the top left because its definition of "authoritarian" is being against gay marriage etc.
That said, it was worth watching Ben struggle his way through these completely neutrally-phrased questions, only to conclude that it was obviously written by deliberately deceptive leftists as some kind of conspiracy, in exactly the same way he reacted to Andrew Neil. When you're a proto-fascist, neutrality must seem like some kind of leftist psy-op.
Edit - I also just noticed this in the paragraph before the test: "To question the logic of individual [questions] that irritate you is to miss the point." Lol.
Nepal Guy a tankie is cringe
@@nepalguy1009 Basically the "Stalin did nothing wrong" types.
@@nepalguy1009 It's a word used to describe "authoritarian" leftists like MLs, Maoist etc. It's usually used as a derogatory term but it has lost all its meaning since liberals started using it to describe people like Bernie Sanders
@@Albietross1 ok anarkiddie
Nepal Guy
In 1956, the workers and students of Hungary revolted. They demanded free Party elections, civil liberties, and economic reorganization (but they did NOT demand capitalism, to be clear). They established workers’ councils, formed militias, and overthrew the government.
A few months later, the USSR sent tanks into Hungary to crush the revolution. And thus the “tankie” was born.
The term was first used to describe British communists who supported the suppression of the revolt. Now, it generally refers to people who support the authoritarian acts of the USSR, China, etc.
The Kool Kids Kphilosopher...the 3rd k is silent, like a dog whistle
Bruh!!! 😂😂😂
10/10, Gary
Ben Shapiro 1984-2020
Cause of death: This comment!
Omg, you’re so witty. I bet you are a HOOT at parties with your cats
@@archimmes
You do understand that Ben Shapiro is an utter dunce, confidently spouting nonsense as his profession?
“You know the seam in your ballsack? Well his has a three inch groove cause he is nonstop straddling the fence” bravo, vaush. Pure savagery bröther.
Really savage talking to his completely liberal audience behind a camera? If he is savagely destroying Ben Shapiro why doesn't he confront him and have a productive debate.
@@orando191 His audience is not liberal. Also, he probably doesn't debate Shapiro since his favorite tactic is gish galopping.
@@InfiniteDeckhand All the comments make fun of Ben Shapiro. Disagree. How is this audience diversified across the left and right? The entire audience on the Twitch chat were saying the same thing. Ben Shapiro isn't smart etc. His favourite tactic is called being civilised and then reverting to calling names. Gish Galloping? He clearly understands his beliefs so why can't he defend them.
@@orando191 liberals are right wing and Vaush's audience is not. Leftists are left wing, hence *left*-ist. You see it now?
@@orando191 Liberal and left-leaning are not synonymous. You're correct in saying that Vaush's audience doesn't contain many right-wing people, but that doesn't mean it contains liberals. Vaush is an anarcho-syndicalist, which means the vast majority of his audience is gonna be some flavor of socialist - which is not liberal.
Just remember his slogan "facts over feelings"
It's a fact that he has feelings for Steven Crowder.
the facts that agree with him that is
no other facts theyre false
He views his feelings as facts, so that might explain a lot.
Sexuality hasn't "gone too far", it completely drenches almost every aspect of our lives, and ALWAYS HAS.
'Drenches'. Kinky.
@@captaintomato5433 thanks, I's hoping someone would enjoy that!
That makes sense--Freud was right about that, since most of us MUST have sex to survive as a species!
I went to the website and this is what says right before the questions start:
"Please note that this isn't a survey and these aren't questions. They are propositions. To question the logic of individual ones is to miss the point. Some propositions are extreme and some are moderate. That’s how we can show you whether you lean towards extremism or moderation on the Compass. Your responses should not be overthought. Some of them are intentionally vague. Their purpose is to trigger reactions in the mind, measuring feelings and prejudices rather than detailed opinions on policy."
Obviously, Ben didn't read this part.
"Men and women serve different roles"
Even though earlier he said both the man and the woman share the same responsibility as the homemaker as well as a job. But oh no, fathers can't be the passionate and emotional parent, and mothers can't be the hard-line, disciplinary parent. Because one has boobies and the other has moobies.
Dead Ninja Storage dude, how did you read that, and come to that conclusion?
M o o b i e s
@Dead Ninja Storage Random other person, but there's a lot of cultural baggage there in addition to the biological basis of increased aggression from testosterone. Norms become self reinforcing, especially when it's considered the "right" way to raise children.
There's enough variance between people in general that this is largely prescriptivist rather than just natural progression of people's personalities.
Dead Ninja Storage the OP was being sarcastic, man.. or condescending.
To answer your question: That’s the way society has been setup, I assume; since the hunter-gathering days, men always been the providers & protectors- I assume men never really had the option, while women give birth, and the child is directly connected- add the other societal norms/expectations? Here we are.. again, I assume; but, it’s definitely not true due to what we see now.. it’s definitely not a absolute, as well.
There are many women who are tough disciplinarians, and fathers who are more loving & caring to their children. As we see the playing field leveled, where women & men are providers, and equal- we are seeing that parenting standards aren’t based on gender; because the options are open to fathers & mothers to be more nurturing if they want to be..
This is just me pretty much rambling.. but, hopefully I provided some kind of insight to how I perceive it to be. I’m sure I’m not accurate, or correct, but-
Am I the only one freaking out about Hungary: ua-cam.com/video/4dtp57Om3mQ/v-deo.html The president straight up used coronavirus to become president for life!
"hello ben, how are you today?"
"the very phraseology of this question is idiotic!"
Bencil Sharpenero comes to the shocking revelation that you can't fast talk an online quiz
To help this channel understand since you guys clearly don't get half the things he is saying and makeup quotes he said. "Supporting war on drugs" is an example of where despite the opposite opinion with supporting the legalization of marujana on the test they say that he does.
Bigotry against fast talking people
Orlando Bell Bray you started this comment by promising to help us understand something, then proceeded to do exactly the opposite.
@@orando191 lmfao what you said was riddled with grammatical errors and what you said made even less sense then what Benjamin sharpener said
@@shimailamansoor5839 , you can't argue that considering your grammatical errors. The use of lmfao doesn't make your point any better.
Oh boy, I can't wait to take advantage of the amazing healthcare system that almost no one can afford
Almost no one can afford? xD Most people in the US can afford healthcare, and if its a life or death situation you will be brought to a hospital and be treated FOR FREE.
Stealthy Fang congrats on being a fucking dumbass
This why ppl go to Mexico an Canada to get drugs Mexico is the best place for people with diabetes since the insulin is way cheaper
@@stealthyfang3660 57% of Americans have healthcare, NOT most…
@@stevonwhite8933 think my original comment got flagged for spam because I posted a link but no that is just simply not true and I’m not sure where you got that number
I remember the day Margret Thatcher died, because everyone kept calling into radio stations to request ding dong the witch is dead. Haven't seen the people of Merseyside that happy in a while!
Yeah the song made it to number one on the Scottish charts
@@vivuecalci8400 Don't even have to be a commie to think Thatcher was a piece of shit. Plus it's worth asking are you from the UK? Cos cultural differences will be a factor.
A Bruno Powroznik classic
@@GameGod77 This guy is absolutely not from the UK, he has absolutely no idea of the devastation she left in the North of England and Scotland, with zero infrastructure to counteract the annihilation of several key industries, nor incentives for private entities to provide new opportunities, investment and employment so people could live. I would go so far as to say this reeks of the reductionist notion of "Well she modernised the economy, but at the cost of half the country". Empathy is only expected to come from the bottom up.
@Harris Zaindi How is Boris a damn fascist? He's clearly a neo liberal civ nat.
i want ben to debate vaush, that will be genuinely funny seeing ben try to talk over vaush but getting shut down
Too bad that'll never happen since Vaush graduated college :/
@@WiloPolis03 lmao
Ben would eviscerate Vaush
@@hainezy4853 He said under a video of Big Ben getting clapped by a website.
Ben would fucking end him 🤣
Geneva convention more like Geneva suggestion
The only thing they're right about is not desecrating synagogues of course
Logan Newman well you see the very phraseology of the Geneva convention can be very misleading...
Civilian deaths? More like necessary casualties.
The biggest smooth brain moment here is when he tried to argue that monopolies only happen because the government props companies up
Have you forgotten Amazon paid no federal taxes last year? And who let them get away with that? The government. Look at them prop up that monopoly by doing nothing about it! *Laughs in Neo-Liberalese*
@@jackhiggins3936 you must have not heard Vaush from 26:23-26:52.
It's basically backwards. Corporations/common Capital interests prop-up governments. Not the other way around. And the USA has it's DNA written by monied interests since day 1. Stuff like the IMF, WB, WTO and various others are just auxiliary bodies pertaining to Global Capital's mobility and "freedom".
@@jackhiggins3936 it literally wouldn't be any different under libertarianism. They don't pay taxes now, they wouldn't then LOL
That's because it is true that complete monopolies cannot establish without a government. In developing countries where markets haven't developed, it is possible. America isn't a developing country.
Ben Shapiro is literally Pinochet
I wish; Pinochet did nothing wrong
@@VBYTP Pinochet literally supported the death of thousands to ensure the free market's control. Pinochet would have let his grandmother die if she were getting in the way of his profits.
How.
VB YTP I mean, I guess facilitating the disappearance of your political opponents and marginalized protestors in order to maintain a dictatorship/power is nothing wrong 🤪
Pinochet was a fascist. Ben Shapiro classifies according to the supposedly 'unbiased' political compass as a Neo-Conservative with Libertarian Qualities. Pinochet even if he was a Libertarian would be a hoppean which is a reactionary, not a conservative.
The MOST IMPORTANT THING to teach a child is EMPATHY and critical thinking skills
Exactly!
If Ben was more honest he would have been squarely in the authoritarian right. I liked how he seemed soo surprised that he BARELY avoided the authoritarian quadrant.
I've heard (from a Marxist Leninist) that this particular test is virtually impossible to score authoritarian on.
The political compass is very biased towards being on the left and libertarian.
@@yScribblezHD That's true, I took this one test I heard is very accurate, it put me all the way in top left, but the political compass test puts me in center left for some reason
@@yScribblezHD I think the secret is to actually get into a position of power IRL.
@@honeybee3269 What irks me about this compass is that libertarianism is being equated with anti-authoritarianism.
I've personally encountered libertarians who argued against public protests because they thought that people marching on the streets interferes too much with the ability of employees to get to work. And other libertarians (like Ron Paul) opposed the Civil Rights Act because they believe businesses should be allowed to discriminate against minorities.
None of the other cardinal directions of that compass have a label that is also the name of a specific political philosophy; that bottom part should read "civil liberties" or "individual rights" instead of "libertarianism".
Ben Shapiro is my favourite comedian
You have some wicked dark sense of humor.
To be fair, at least he would probably be better than Steven Crowder.
And Amy Schumer is funny
obviously you havent heard of karl marx
@@RealErk Sounds like a great comedian as well. Funniest manifesto i've ever seen.
"Capitalism works" in 2K20, what a meme.
socialism has never worked LOL
Well, I mean almost every fuckin country in the world is capitalist. Or do you wanna be like North Korea?
As a Jewish person Ben makes me sick. I feel like it dishonors the memory of mine and ben and every Jewish persons ancestors.
I feel like no Jewish person can ‘dishonour’ the whole religion. He’s just a guy who happens to be Jewish, does it need that much attention?
Alex Coleridge i think they’re saying that he gives it a bad name
Jeez people like you that appropriate religion is the worse
Rodrigo Rex I’m not appropriating anything. I’m not even religious, my grandmother was held in a concentration camp, so I have a personal connection to this shit so I feel it’s important for Jewish people to not support the same policies as nazis because my own family was even affected by the atrocities that occurred. I’m ethnically and culturally Jewish, traced all the way to Israel THATS why I say I’m Jewish and to hear Ben espouse am ideology so similar to nazism is disgusting on a cellular level sooo go eat shit fucktard.
@@Snowmeus Nazis called themselves "national socialists" as a propaganda tool, they were not actually socialists. they were fascists that actively demonized and slaughtered leftists ie socialists and communists. How are you going to accuse OP of having "0% facts" when you don't know that?
Ben is visibly taking options against what he's advocated for to influence the result of the political compass, that's why he has to rephrase every question he's given that would put him square into the authoritarian right.
The funny part is that he still barely scraped into the libertarian area.
Absolutely. I followed along changing the answers he lied about and qualified based on what he's advocated for in the past, and got an 8 right and 4 authoritarian. Libertarian my butt cheeks.
How come Ben could predict the results pretty accurately, is it because he is a evil genius or because maybe there was some factual information he was giving everyone...?
@@matthewmaguire7668 He set a goal for his results and actively biased his answers to attain it even if it meant openly contradicting opinions he's clearly held by justifying his points by debating each question that would do that.
And let's keep in mind that he could have taken the test before and knew he had to skewer the results to keep himself from being outed as someone worth going to the Nuremberg tribunal.
@@matthewmaguire7668
He was able to predict the outcome because he knows which ideological beliefs correlate to which quadrant of the political compass. It doesn't take a genius to figure what fits in where. That's why he kept going on tirades about "bias question framing", he may be a fucking idiot, but he knows what he is well enough to know that he should probably lie about it. His job is literally to be a mouthpiece for corporatist fascism, he advocates for authoritarian right policies all the time, he shits on minorities, ESPECIALLY Muslims. It's the same reason I was able to predict that I'd end up in Libertarian Left, he knows what goes where.
When your ideology is purposely incoherent, any attempt at clarification is bait.
Whats hilarious is that some people think he's a genius
Imagine saying that to Jordan Peterson.
@@dexterjettster8875 also a complete clown
@@bforthigh1617 I don't know what I was expecting from a group of dumb leftists.
B for Thigh please elaborate
"The very phraseology of the question is idiotic"
Directly over that first question it says: *Before taking the test:* Please note that this isn’t a survey, and these aren’t questions. They’re propositions. To question the logic of individual ones that irritate you is to miss the point.
I think they added that after Ben posted this video lmao
imagine being pro death penalty and pro life.
Imagine being pro baby killing and against the death penalty. Wait, that's the majority of Vaush's viewers.
@@UserRobot215 how do you reconcile being pro life and pro death penalty? i thought murder was a sin...
@@UserRobot215 So a clump of cells is a baby? Ever seen an embryo? That thing doesn’t even have limbs yet gtfoh
it's because they only care about you as long as they can use you
@@namitaseshadri2638 I don't believe in the death penalty, it is an easy way out. The ultimate punishment is life in prison without parole. Your turn now, how is one pro baby killing and against the death penalty?
Ben crying about Hitler and Thatcher being in the same category absolutely sent me
Let's see: Hitler was pro big government, protectionist economy, and believed that women first and foremost should be mothers. Thatcher was anti big government, pro free market, and was the first female PM of Britain. But yea... They totally had the same ideology.
@@haas1776 who said they have the same ideology?
Anders Haastrup U know Hitler’s economic policy was coined as “privatization”...
And Hitler’s own surviving generals said that the closest modern politician with economic political views similar to Hitler’s was Ronald Reagan XD
@@acceleration4443 Holy shit, you're right. www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf Shut my mouth, could've sworn Hitler was a public sector guy.
Acceleration where do I finger the information on the Reagan hitler connection?
Ben Shapiro: "You don't need government; it's fraud so you can just sue them."
Any brain cell: 😕 "How?"
With your dad's money, duh
@@Mhinqa Hahahaha
By suing them. Looks like you forgot to use yours. Its called legal prosecution.
@@orando191 What institution sets "Law" and "Law enforcement" in the 1st place?
@@BenReillySpydr1962 Government doesn't own all legal enforcement. And yes they put in place laws but Ben is saying you should take it into your own hands. Personal Prosecution in his eyes is better than getting a state to intervene. The Government does set law however a non-governmental non-aggression principle states that if you exercise aggression through hurting, stealing or anything without consent then you are allowed to respond through immediate physical defence or legal prosecution. I would think Ben follows this principle considering his libertarian values.
I like how he whines about the questions and then ultimately agrees with the results.
"Are you a racist?"
"Oh wow what a dodgy question. But yes."
He disagreed with the results and complained he wanted to be more libertarian.
The questions are poorly written. I bet lefty's getting compared to Stalin are the upset ones.
Not Cthulhu i
no one:
Ben Shapiro: PhRaSeOlOgY
You spelled it wrong, also its a real word used completely correctly so commenting this makes you look like an idiot.
@@stealthyfang3660 issa joke, why tf you so pressed
@@stealthyfang3660
@oreo champ actually spelled ‘phraseology’ correctly (so commenting this makes you look like an idiot 😆)
@@stealthyfang3660 the only way he spelled it wrong is that Shapiro was saying the made-up word “phrasiology” instead of “phraseology” or the word he actually meant “phrasing”.
@@katyungodly they are pronounced the same, I’m sorry none of you understand this because I’ve explained it multiple times in this comment section but phraseology refers to the phrasing of a question.
question-chan: do u like helping ppl in need uwu?
benny boi: *math formulas popping in front of his face as if it's rocket science meme*
I can't think of another human being who is wrong about every single thing, except Shatpiro.
What about you and your typo?
@Tally Ho I don't keep up with things, what did MauLer do/say?
Steven Crowder
@@thek2despot426
1. He calls all of his opinions on media "objective" and basically believes that you can be factually wrong for liking or disliking a movie
2. He makes 12 hour videos on why star war movie bad because forced diversity and plotholes
3. He fREAKING GAVE AVATAR THE LAST AIRBENDER A 4/10 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
@@WiloPolis03 the live action one, or the famously great tv show?
I love how he says "WWI proved that wrong" on the question of Class vs Nationality when literally one of the main factors in ending WWI was the multitude of worker revolts in Russia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Finland, etc... . It's like Mr. Shapiro here has never heard about the Bolshevik revolution, and just goes off of hist Freshman Highschool History textbook which just stated: "WWI ended in 1918 and then there was peace". How can this man claim to be educated on history when he doesn't even know the basics of Europe in the interwar period? He makes me so mad.
I think his point is supposed to be that a Nationalism-Inspired assassination brought things to the tipping point and that it ended Imperialism in the contiguous state sense as it had existed since basically the agricultural revolution. It could be argued that it started because of Nationalism in opposition to Imperialism, it's obvious its end was brought about through collectivism (AND THE ALMIGHTY DADDY THAT IS THE UNITED STATES OF COURSE). All things considered, I'd say it's fair to give Ben a point for every Fuhrer of Nazi Germany that was of German birth
Many of those worker revolts have no connection to WW2 and happened after or before. Finland has no significant involvement. Italy's revolt happened in 1966 in what was known as hot autumn.
@@jackhiggins3936 then why didn't he say that or explain his statement at all. Something to consider is that maybe he said it that way for someone like you to fill in the blank despite him never actually elaborating?
Jim I’m just playing devil’s advocate I’m not making excuses for Bench Shrapnel
@@jackhiggins3936 by doing that, you've given power to his statement that very likely was never there.
Ah yes, my first vaush video, the one that brought me away from the right
You werent very right if this guy bullying random people changed your ideology.
@@stealthyfang3660 Because he's bullying Shapiro, and Shapiro is a random guy ? Makes sense.
Welcome to the left, comrade!
Thrown Sword Pommel yes
@@stealthyfang3660 1) Shapiro isn't a random guy. He's a well known political personality with a large audience, much bigger than Vaush's, which makes Vaush the "random guy".
2). This isn't bullying. Shapiro probably doesn't even know this video exists and if he does, there's no way he could possibly be psychologically harmed by it. Even if he is, facts don't care about his feelings.
Ben 'Any question that triggers a defensive reaction in my feelings is leftist propaganda' Shapiro.
I just absolutely love how he front loads the beginning by saying if he doesn't get the answer he wants the test is wrong
He literally doesn't know how to read the graph
Bold of you to assume he can read.
“Anti-Porn Task Force”
LMFAO
Do you think Shapiro knows that some people’s tap water isn’t safe?
also you pay a water bill lmao
Jay Jay the Jet Plane lol so true what a fucking idiot water is so not free
Ben is the kind of guy you take out to have dinner, he finds a typo on the menu and spends the whole meal complaining about it. Also when the waitress takes your order, he tries to make a joke about it but she looks very uncomfortable and honestly you're just embarrassed to be there. He doesn't leave a tip.
I lost you at "Ben is the kind of guy you take out to have dinner"
Benjamin Shitpiro with the Harvard PhD in "Phrasiology"!
This is actually ridiculous and makes you sound stupid. He used the word completely correctly.
PumpkinCatto literally look it up I have no way if proving it is just open a dictionary
"All these questions are designed to provoke a response." Yes Ben, that is the point.
A CERTAIN response.
Vaush's point on Self Discipline was seriously inspiring and heartwarming to hear, I struggle immensely with executive function and self discipline to the point where i am completely paralysed, i've spent nearly my entire life in the first state that they describe, waiting for the perfect moment putting things off, and it has completely prevented me from reaching my academic and creative potential. Thank You Vaush, you have inspired my renewed belief in self discipline, I am worth the work it takes.
What time stamp is that?
37:56
It's called ADHD/ADD bro. I have the same issue
That's beautifully by vaush assessment about self-discipline and your take as well
I was really really hoping the test was going to tell him he's a Nazi. That would have been hilarious
How can ben Shapiro be a Nazi he is Jewish and besides just because you call someone a Nazi doesn't mean they believe in lebensraum or greater Germany
How did he manage to lose an online personality test
No one knows. He just outsmarted himself.
What did you expect from a guy with a personality of a 90s printer
its the funniest thing when he is asking his chat questions and its just a stream of nopes.
where else would Thatcher be than AuthRight? I don't understand what the issue is there that Ben had
He probably thinks Hitler is liberal because that's the cons' favourite flavour of gotcha to own the libs with. Even if it's been debunked to death.
@Reuben Thomasson Not true--he is a Jew.
Ben has a lot of trouble with point of view in this video. Every time he gets asked about "should someone else have the power to tell me what to do?" he's a libertarian. But if the question is "should I have the power to tell someone else what to do?" fascist Ben shows up. So Ben is fundamentally fascist when the right is in power, and fundamentally libertarian when the left is in power.
seraphonica schrödinger’s Shapiro: simultaneously fascist and libertarian
So his ideology is just selfishness?
1:04:03
"But only because I apply it to men and women equally"
1:11:17
"I don't think men and women have the same roles"
Hmm... which is it, Benjiman Sharpie
ben "sacrificing grandma to the line" shapiro
Did Ben Shatpiro really try to breakdown Imagine by John Lennon I-
Watch the full clip it is hilarious, he said it was commie propaganda
Cian Coogan absolute gold
@@broidk8291 well it is but that's a good thing
Ben: The capitalist free market is great and could never possibly be wrong in anyway Also Ben: Except for the porn market cause I don’t like it
I literally cried laughing when you said his ball seam was 3 inches thick from fence sitting. Thanks for that man.
I love how conservatives can't imagine land being held in common, yet that has been the system for most of European history (i.e. in England, until the first Enclosure Acts in 1604).
Yes, in government as Ben pointed out.
@@orando191 not really by government per se. Not as we'd understand it. Indeed , monarchy "ownership" is as similar to private ownership as state ownership by modernist standards. It's not really so useful to apply that lens, and if you insist on doing so you should equally treat it as critique of the private ownership model (which, obviously Ben won't since he will only reduce history down to an anti-government narrative for his own purposes, hence monarchy will be interpreted as modern state rather than modern corporate owner although they can apply equally).
Land can be best understood in modern terms as "owned" by the crown and parcelled out in exchange for allegiance and taxes (feudalism), however the idea was that land was free for common usage as while the monarch was God's elected ruler on Earth, they didn't "own" the land. Which is why the acts of enclosure which basically created what we'd recognise as private land ownership rights were so controversial.
The idea that you could just categorically claim a piece of land as one-person's enduring legal entity was a foreign one. The king had the divine right to dictate land use for purposes, but the whole community still had certain assumed rights over land (in particular, it's use for subsistence).
@@mrmcduck4902 Although that's technically true, the fact is that society then was more hierarchized despite that. Commom ownership doesn't necessarily mean more equality. The high society had access to far more land and privileges than the rest, not to mention that the servants had to pay so many tributes that they weren't much different than minimum wage slaves
@@ThePipojp that's absolutely true, but that wasn't the point I was making at all.
I'm not claiming feudalism was actually super egalitarian and good socialist policy because they were allowed to use land for food they needed to not die.
My point was that private ownership as we understand it is a historically recent concept, and the conservative habits of viewing private ownership as a constant through history (when it wasn't even constant in European history) along with reading feudalism as analogous to state ownership (when it is as similar to private ownership model by modern standards, since the state was embodied in an individual) is anachronistic cherry-picking.
@@mrmcduck4902 Oh, sorry, didn't think that there were people actually claiming that private ownership of landing was contant through history. Isn't It commom sense that capitalism in general is kinda new?
Someone needs to argue with Ben and then accuse him of being a leftist for asking any questions
He'd attempt murder!
lol
please make sence.
Holy shit, Ben is constantly on the defensive. Does he think the quiz is trying to get him?
He's a propagandist. He's got to A: Promote conservative talking pointes as ideology, and B: Train his viewers to see anything unexpected as an assault in the culture war.
Thank you,
I am a libertarian and watching your videos help me improve my agruments and shift my beliefs towards more factualy correct positions
I think that libertarians should realize that BOTH governments AND businesses can be tyrannical!
EDIT: I know that a lot of libertarians, including you, do realize what I said above, but, sadly, some libertarian think-tanks tend to not hold corporations accountable, and instead just blame the government, which is only half true!
@@megauser8512 We aknowledge that, that's why we don't like corporations.