95% of all the businesses that existed during the 1st industrial era failed to successfully transition into the 2nd industrial era. This time its going to be even worse. Manufacturing is not going to survive the additive manufacturing era. AI is already giving us the answers in the material sciences needed for the creation of nano-robotics. We get to nano-replication in the next 20 years (chances are it is going to happen before that with the rate of innovation we are seeing in the field today) and we will be facing the collapse of the monetary economic model entirely. The entire reason for the existence of money is to solve scarcity in the environment by allowing the flow of goods and services. There is no scarcity when you are recycling materials at the atomic scale.
A lot of good ideas, and a really interesting talk!!!! But there is one thing we need to keep in mind....... paper!!! They told us paper was going to go away. But we pretty much print off everything in the workplace!!! We use more paper today than we did then!!! And people are going back to buying books.... if we want to know the future, we need to examine this paper trend. So the real question is, “Will our paradigms hold us back from success”? “Is the system too big for companies to see the benefits of change”?
Not necessary the more is better, actually there is a problem actually, IT technology companies some of them they offer services giving to the customer more options to choose. They don't realize that have more options is not necessary better, as we spend more time energy to choose.
this talk is a good example for trying to keep ur business floating. reality is though that the market will adapt n shift on its own. companies will go down while other emerge. it's harder to adapt an existing company setting to new needs than starting a new one.
Average lifespan of a company (Fortune 500) (3:00m) I think I can specifically identify the coming and going of major tech trends or eras? 1985 was the peak of the DOS world. 2000 of course was the collapse of the dot-com evaluation bubble. Overall trend is that the chaos of automation productivity is putting a weight around the neck of non-alpha firms like Twitter / Lyft etc., and they are thrown into turbulent roiling seas. There is the "upside" of opportunity to overthrow established systems - IBM vs. Microsoft, Microsoft vs. Borland etc (in programming), thence Open Source vs. Microsoft; Google vs. formerly mainstream advertising mediums; and in niche areas as well, as technology overpowers and disrupts the non-alpha first-wave players who arrive, nevertheless, in the S&P.
Thank you for posting this interesting talk!
95% of all the businesses that existed during the 1st industrial era failed to successfully transition into the 2nd industrial era. This time its going to be even worse. Manufacturing is not going to survive the additive manufacturing era. AI is already giving us the answers in the material sciences needed for the creation of nano-robotics. We get to nano-replication in the next 20 years (chances are it is going to happen before that with the rate of innovation we are seeing in the field today) and we will be facing the collapse of the monetary economic model entirely. The entire reason for the existence of money is to solve scarcity in the environment by allowing the flow of goods and services. There is no scarcity when you are recycling materials at the atomic scale.
A lot of good ideas, and a really interesting talk!!!! But there is one thing we need to keep in mind....... paper!!! They told us paper was going to go away. But we pretty much print off everything in the workplace!!! We use more paper today than we did then!!! And people are going back to buying books.... if we want to know the future, we need to examine this paper trend. So the real question is, “Will our paradigms hold us back from success”? “Is the system too big for companies to see the benefits of change”?
Nobody, it's becoming extremely rich selling paper, nobody.
Paper will be something of the past.
This comment makes me realize that humanity is doomed.
Not necessary the more is better, actually there is a problem actually, IT technology companies some of them they offer services giving to the customer more options to choose. They don't realize that have more options is not necessary better, as we spend more time energy to choose.
What we call 'the agony of choice'. Offer 4 jams to taste at the front of the store and sell more jam. Offer 12 jams to taste and you sell less jam
Why is this person using all these words? Occam's Razor?
Speaker seems a bit distracted throughout this talk
That often happens during deliveries of Deliberate Ambiguity, as folks dart & dance around direct conversation & terms.
this talk is a good example for trying to keep ur business floating. reality is though that the market will adapt n shift on its own. companies will go down while other emerge. it's harder to adapt an existing company setting to new needs than starting a new one.
Uuiuuuuttututilities you tsssrtstssdy dy
Isidrosisiossusrrttttd eeerssssraaasrssssrrrsrrr as
Tell that to the Ice Man.
Average lifespan of a company (Fortune 500) (3:00m)
I think I can specifically identify the coming and going of major tech trends or eras? 1985 was the peak of the DOS world. 2000 of course was the collapse of the dot-com evaluation bubble.
Overall trend is that the chaos of automation productivity is putting a weight around the neck of non-alpha firms like Twitter / Lyft etc., and they are thrown into turbulent roiling seas. There is the "upside" of opportunity to overthrow established systems - IBM vs. Microsoft, Microsoft vs. Borland etc (in programming), thence Open Source vs. Microsoft; Google vs. formerly mainstream advertising mediums; and in niche areas as well, as technology overpowers and disrupts the non-alpha first-wave players who arrive, nevertheless, in the S&P.
agree
You could see what bombardment of information did to his forehead.
Lol haha
Satans great reset
Just us chickens.