Lesson 1 - Revelation Introduction

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 67

  • @nnamdiubadike9367
    @nnamdiubadike9367 10 місяців тому +2

    Great introduction. May YHWH bless you.

  • @meseekingyah3041
    @meseekingyah3041 6 років тому +9

    Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!! I am so happy YOU are doing this!! So looking forward to it!! Yah bless and guide you, brother Tom!!

  • @shanehuang5839
    @shanehuang5839 5 років тому +5

    What an amazing teaching session! Thank you!!!!!

  • @angelavarnell5504
    @angelavarnell5504 4 місяці тому

    You and your teachings are a great blessing to many 🙏

  • @He-reigns
    @He-reigns Рік тому +4

    You’re a great teacher brother 👍🙏

  • @peggiunderwood9519
    @peggiunderwood9519 6 років тому +15

    Blessings to you, your family and ministry. Looking forward to your future teachings on Revelation. YouTub is a great tool for sharing. Thank you ABBA for this ministry; to you be all the Glory...

  • @Faithful_Watchman
    @Faithful_Watchman 10 місяців тому +1

    Awesome introduction. Very articulate.

  • @JoSh-oo-Ah
    @JoSh-oo-Ah 6 років тому +5

    Thank you so much! Ive never had so many questions answered. ❤

  • @karlkrause5389
    @karlkrause5389 3 роки тому

    Fantastic...glory Glory GLORY 👍

  • @GeorgeLevi8
    @GeorgeLevi8 3 місяці тому

    Thanks Tom ❤

  • @Bildad1976
    @Bildad1976 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for posting this series! I was just pitched a course on "The Hebrew Perspective on The Book of Revelation" for $1000 (which I turned down).
    Just one point so far: at 17:37, "By no means at that time were these writings seen as inspired by God, much less Holy scripture."
    How should one view Peter's statement in 2 Peter 3:16b, "There are some things in them (Paul's writings) that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do THE OTHER SCRIPTURES." (emphasis mine)
    This seems to indicate that Peter and probably other Christians in his sphere of influence, considered Paul's writings (and possibly others' writings, as well) Holy Scripture.

  • @violetamariposa2404
    @violetamariposa2404 6 років тому +19

    It seems like YHWH protected those who realized that they were Messianic believers, grafted into His family. But then when they set themselves apart, they stepped out from under the protection of YHWH's wing. This must be the point where the great falling away began and it keeps getting worse as time passes. I know most people talk about it like it is in the future but I think it is now reaching it's tipping point. Most Christians that I know think that they are going to Heaven but do not think that we need to obey YHWH's commands found in the Bible; they think it is old fashioned and does not fit into modern life.

    • @ripgeorgesmith9021
      @ripgeorgesmith9021 4 роки тому +3

      *Well look at today, you were right.*

    • @yishaib.hallel2441
      @yishaib.hallel2441 3 роки тому +1

      👏💢🗨👍💯😇

    • @penocruz4981
      @penocruz4981 Рік тому

      Or they think is too jewish

    • @abongiledlova477
      @abongiledlova477 11 місяців тому

      The name of the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The Lord God of Israel, the Father of our Lord Yeshua of Nazareth the King of the Jews is the Lord YEHOVA, that is his name, the Lord YEHOVA.

    • @nnamdiubadike9367
      @nnamdiubadike9367 10 місяців тому

      ​@@abongiledlova477 YHWH

  • @jsimones195o
    @jsimones195o 5 років тому +5

    What about 2 Peter 3:16 where Peter compares Paul's writings to "scriptures"?

    • @irish6795
      @irish6795 Рік тому +1

      Peter calls Paul’s teachings epistles, or letters

  • @naijaprops
    @naijaprops 2 місяці тому

    I wish you could teach on Biblical meditation that works

  • @daprhu
    @daprhu 10 місяців тому

    What? No ads every three minutes? What a concept.

  • @Yaaqov777
    @Yaaqov777 Рік тому +1

    Shalom, as one whom occasionally listens to your teachings .
    And though this was recorded five years ago. I've enjoyed your first opening class in Revelation..
    I've listened to the complete lessons from Lion and Lamb Ministries. I didn't agree with much he had to say.
    I'm hoping to understand this book in your teachings

  • @jjxenon
    @jjxenon 2 роки тому

    Thank you. What is the book you're referencing at 41:35? Blessings, j.

  • @HesterOdendaal-z4c
    @HesterOdendaal-z4c 11 місяців тому +1

    It was John the Apostle because Jesus said that there is of you that would not die until they see the Son of men came into His Kingdom with His holy angels.John saw Jesus Christ and he saw the angels.Hallelujah no doubt Amen.

  • @nancylancaster5457
    @nancylancaster5457 10 місяців тому

    Today's evangelical churches who preach according to the whole Bible. The prophets, Daniel, Ezekiel , and Issaiah and all are certainly included in the understanding of Revelation.

  • @jerryfortenberry1956
    @jerryfortenberry1956 4 роки тому +2

    Is it possible to download notes, guidelines, etc ???

    • @victoriadobbs250
      @victoriadobbs250 4 роки тому +2

      Hi Jerry. Here is a link to the notes etc on the Torah website. www.torahclass.com/teacher/author/tom-bradford/new-testament-studies/new-testament-revelation Hope this helps. If you go to the Bible Studies tab it gives you all of Tom Bradford's messages and gives you the option of downloading the audio, or the text or the illustrations he uses :)

  • @hissonggirlmoni5706
    @hissonggirlmoni5706 5 років тому +3

    Um... so of this is written by John the apostle and this was written in 90 AD then John was how old? 120? Did people even live that long by that time?

    • @hissonggirlmoni5706
      @hissonggirlmoni5706 5 років тому

      8:55

    • @nubYaH
      @nubYaH 5 років тому +2

      If he had Jesus’ age, he would have been 90. But if he was younger that he may have had 70 or 80.

    • @hissonggirlmoni5706
      @hissonggirlmoni5706 5 років тому +1

      Nubia Bolkenhagen Vargas i thought AD meant after jesus’ death. Not after his birth. Jesus died at age 33 so if you add 90 plus 33 it equals 123 years old. If he was Jesus age. If he was younger. Maybe 100 no?

    • @georgesmith9415
      @georgesmith9415 4 роки тому +3

      @@nubYaH *then again they went by a whole different calendar*

    • @kylec8950
      @kylec8950 3 роки тому +3

      It was written the in the 60s. The late date of the 90s is pure nonsense.

  • @Lilbit371
    @Lilbit371 2 роки тому

    What about Hebrews 13:2? Isn’t it creditable that these angels of the seven congregations are physically present and capable of reading this even though the people are unaware that they are angels?

  • @Barbara-gh6uv
    @Barbara-gh6uv 6 місяців тому

    🥰

  • @georgesmith9415
    @georgesmith9415 4 роки тому

    *Question, do any Jews use the Revelations in their teachings/studies?*

    • @amandaprotzman733
      @amandaprotzman733 3 роки тому +1

      probaly not unless the jew recognizes Jesus as the messiah

  • @Justaguywithtruth
    @Justaguywithtruth 5 років тому +1

    Seems to me it's like alphabet soup and mixed up by people focused on Religion more than just Believing on what Yeshua, Jesus Christ did for us, being Strong in Faith, Reading, Studying, Praying and Being Obedient to The Father of All.. Whatever way this Ends, just like a Earthly Parent The Messiah will take care of and handle everything.. The Alpha and Omega will bring those home that he desires and punish those who by free will chose to turn from Him..👏💪🙏☝😎✊

  • @martin.asare33
    @martin.asare33 2 місяці тому

    He said the most ridiculous thing ever. That the letters of Paul were not considered scripture in the time of john. Thats false, clearly Peter affirms Paul's letter as scripture and obviously he says in them to the churches that he writes again apostle who is speaking The word of God. Your statement makes it look as if men makes the Canon vs simply recognize it .

  • @DanVilleneuve-gi9is
    @DanVilleneuve-gi9is 2 місяці тому

    REV....10:7

  • @batminton7467
    @batminton7467 4 місяці тому

    You're an amazing teacher, but could you do the Mediterranean people a favor by using mediterranean drawings for their ceasars instead of using german looking drawings, probably drawn by white nationalists. the same people who took the jewishness out of the old and new testament. nothing personal against you ... i swear.

  • @BCCS777Fred
    @BCCS777Fred 6 місяців тому

    Do NOT interpret scriptures , let scriptures interpret scripture.

  • @hermanehrentraut4956
    @hermanehrentraut4956 2 роки тому

    I was watching your series on Judges and in it you warn about the dangers of claiming to have a message from Abba. Having gone through your entire Torah series and Revelation. You, yourself are placing not only yourself but those who are trusting what you say is truth when in fact it is not, further since you claim to know not only English, Greek, and Hebrew that means wrong choices made by the English translators you would have caught, but yet instead you have ignored them and instead perpetuate the falsehoods in the English translations, which means you are doing this on purpose. The book of Revelation uses a lot of Jewish symbolism, it also uses references to things that place most of Revelation in our past. It describes and names technology no longer used. It describes social customs that no longer exist. It describes laws are that are no longer enforced by the military but they once were, and these laws are still being obeyed. Most importantly the book of Revelation uses the same dating method used by the Magian Jews at the time of Yahshua's birth, astronomical dating. If you follow the instructions that John wrote about how to use the Book of Revelation you would know that there is no future antichrist and in fact he has already come over 1,500 years ago, this very truth is what the first protestants who I might add were catholics understood and tried to warn Christians, which led to agents of the antichrist taking two old ideas and giving them new life, one called preterism placed the antichrist before the formation of the church, and the second is called futurism which places the antichrist in the future, and identifies this future antichrist as being someone outside the church lately he is seen as a secularist. There is a third view called the historicism which was the one not only used but taught more than the other two by Christians. By ignoring the truth you are preparing people for an event that will never happen because it already has, further by putting it in the future those who are taking his name, taking his mark, or worshiping his image are committing an act that will have them removed from the book of life, and banished to the lake of fire.

    • @sterfry3182
      @sterfry3182 Рік тому +1

      Wow, tldr. Will you summarize your comment?

    • @hermanehrentraut4956
      @hermanehrentraut4956 Рік тому

      @@sterfry3182 In short Tom Bradford is perpetuating false teachings about what the apostles warned concerning the antichrist and meanings of signs in Revelation. Whether done intentionally or unintentionally makes little difference as both have the same result which is eternal damnation.

  • @kylec8950
    @kylec8950 3 роки тому +4

    Horrible teaching based upon a faulty presuppositional view of the book. Ironically, this "teacher" belittles the true interpretation, the Preterist view.

    • @garlandjones7709
      @garlandjones7709 2 роки тому

      The new testament writers weren't preterists. Preterism has a very ignorant and almost non existent view of old testament prophecy and Jewish interpretation in general. Prophecy is pattern, and it repeats. And you have partial fulfillment before whole. The new testament includes evidence of this style as well. Spend half a decade on old testament studies and I'll promise you that you will no longer be a preterist

    • @kylec8950
      @kylec8950 2 роки тому +1

      @@garlandjones7709 Of course they weren't "preterist" because for them the events were still in our future. Gees...

    • @garlandjones7709
      @garlandjones7709 2 роки тому

      @@kylec8950 they were still alive after 70ad. So why did this teaching not get taught until 1700 years later. Have you studied where preterism originated?

    • @kylec8950
      @kylec8950 2 роки тому +1

      @@garlandjones7709 You said, "So why did this teaching not get taught until 1700 years later" This right here shows your complete ignorance on the topic. But that's okay, we all have to learn sometime.

    • @garlandjones7709
      @garlandjones7709 2 роки тому

      @@kylec8950 feel free to let me know what I missed. I looked into this 5-6 years ago and from what I remember preterism formed around the idea of all prophecies being completed in the first century because of what Jesus said.
      Feel free to offer me insight to what I'm missing