Free Cash Flow

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @chiaradebrabant-bibi8423
    @chiaradebrabant-bibi8423 4 роки тому +6

    I was watching the recording of my professor at Ghent university. She didnt explain it well, i was like no time to waiste, let me head to youtube. So thank you for making this content!

  • @intellectualninjamonkey2496
    @intellectualninjamonkey2496 2 роки тому +5

    This is just perfect instruction.
    I do not know why they do not teach like that in university.
    This was so clear and straightforward.

    • @JasonJafry
      @JasonJafry 2 роки тому +3

      Exactly! why don't they just make it this simple?

  • @alexg2339
    @alexg2339 5 років тому +43

    Off all the videos on UA-cam your explanation was the clearest

  • @dhavalrohilla696
    @dhavalrohilla696 2 роки тому

    I have tears in my eyes ,I was so confused about this concept about the formula of FCFF thank you so much😀😀

  • @nakbarutube
    @nakbarutube 3 роки тому +6

    no words can express my heart-felt gratitude. simply awesome!!!!

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  3 роки тому +1

      Wow, thank you!

  • @jerarrdpandohe4256
    @jerarrdpandohe4256 3 роки тому +3

    Love your videos, from Managerial Accounting to Financial management 🔥🔥🔥

  • @Kringle_X
    @Kringle_X 8 років тому +7

    You're a life savior!

  • @mariakarinagonzalesllontop2497
    @mariakarinagonzalesllontop2497 4 роки тому +1

    great explanation. Ive seen other videos in which they include interest in the formula, but I realized it doesnt matter because it does not affect the results

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  4 роки тому +1

      Yes, there are multiple ways of calculating Free Cash Flow so this can be really confusing. Some companies simply calculate FCF as Operating Cash Flow minus Capital Expenditures in their 10-K filings, while in the field of investment banking it is customary to calculate FCF using a slightly different formula. And there is a distinction between levered FCF and unlevered FCF, which removes the effects of financing. I plan to make some more videos on this

    • @mariakarinagonzalesllontop2497
      @mariakarinagonzalesllontop2497 4 роки тому

      @@Edspira thanks for responding. That`d be great.

  • @lynnz0203
    @lynnz0203 7 років тому +3

    Beautiful, can't image how to pass the course without you 😩

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  7 років тому +1

      Happy to help! I'm glad you are doing well :)

  • @rob8482
    @rob8482 8 років тому +6

    Fantastic, thank you so much for these videos! Always makes sense, you have a real talent.

  • @oae3186
    @oae3186 5 років тому +4

    I swear this felt like rocket science in class😣
    Thank you❤️

  • @anshumanster
    @anshumanster 5 років тому +1

    best explanation in youtube

  • @andypotanin
    @andypotanin 6 років тому +3

    Thank you, sir - you got yourself a new subscriber.

  • @davidsw92
    @davidsw92 3 роки тому

    I always feel like I'm watching an accounting version of FoodWishes when I watch this channel

  • @ngl.rsr.1213
    @ngl.rsr.1213 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much Edspira!💛

  • @martijntjeeh
    @martijntjeeh 7 років тому +2

    So why not interest before tax? Because if you do EBIT * 1-tax rate, you get a higher tax rate then you should pay right? Because you pay taxes over your EBT and not over your EBIT?

  • @shimonize11
    @shimonize11 5 років тому +1

    What would the INCREASE In networking capital be? would it be the difference between this year and the previous year?

    • @amazingabs
      @amazingabs 5 років тому

      I have the same question...my guess is yes...

  • @bhagatsingh5019
    @bhagatsingh5019 8 років тому

    Thank you for your all beautifully explained videos.

  • @sovanaphumprak2410
    @sovanaphumprak2410 4 роки тому

    If the interest have to be there, why not CFC= EBT*(1-t) + Interest +...? We would get a higher value (more cash) as interest tax shield would not be substracted as in the EBIT.

  • @brightmind5345
    @brightmind5345 5 років тому

    fine, I can not understand this equation, you subtracted a full charge depreciation expense from a scaled earning before tax and interest which include a component of depreciation which is scaled by the effect of scaling process?. the only interpretation by me. is because of depreciation might be described as a tax shield component. because its effect inside the formula was to mitigate the tax effect then I should be adjusted with its full charge, please correct me if i am wrong, and thanks.

  • @jyotibarman1247
    @jyotibarman1247 4 роки тому +1

    Is negative capex plausible? cause in my calculation my capex happens to be a neagtive number .(so do i have to add the capex in the formula)

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  4 роки тому

      Negative capex is not possible; the lowest capex can be is zero

  • @Leandrasjones
    @Leandrasjones 4 роки тому

    minute @ 3:40 could anyone explain the tax bit of (1-t) a little more? So if tax is 40% you want to multiple by 60% (1-40%) why? I wasn't too clear on the reason for this
    Also overall why is the free cash flow number before any consideration for debt a good number to know? What is the benefit of knowing this? if the debt is in the business and must be paid, isnt the free cash flow really after paying the debt? Please help me understand generally the benefit of free cash flow. Thanks.

  • @iAliAbdallahYT
    @iAliAbdallahYT 9 років тому

    A great video & explanation. But what if the firm gets an operating loan to finance its CAPEX or operating expenses? Are the loan inflow and its repayments included in the calculation of FCF???

    • @shawn576
      @shawn576 8 років тому +3

      +Ali Abdallah Nope. Issuing bonds and equity are not part of FCF. It's simply cash from operations less capital expenditures. If the capital expenditures exceed the cash from operations, the company has negative FCF. Tesla Motors is a good example of this. The company's net cash increases due to financing activities, but FCF is extremely negative, meaning the business is not at all sustainable. The FCF calculation shows why a stock like Tesla is a very high risk speculation, but a company like Hershey is a very low risk investment.
      One should also compare the capex to the reported depreciation. If the depreciation is consistently larger than capex over a span of several years, it means the business is slowly liquidating itself, which is very bad.

  • @AYK-stronger
    @AYK-stronger 3 місяці тому

    Why are you adding back depreciation to EBIT(1-t)? EBIT should rightfully be subtracted and not added back, because it reflects how much wear & tear the PPE has gone through; regardless of whether or not it is a non-cash expense or not? If you subtract depreciation expense from I/S, I guess the logic is that since that depreciation is not really cash leaving the Co. it gets added back to FCF because it not actually cash leaving the firm

  • @Brosef522
    @Brosef522 8 років тому

    Can you explain why taxes are deducted in order to get to unlevered FCF? Since interest on debt is a pre-tax expense, don't creditors have access to cash flows even before the government?

  • @zz7733
    @zz7733 3 роки тому +2

    This guy sounds exactly like Food Wishes

  • @presley6004
    @presley6004 7 років тому

    Hi there, I am just wondering if there's no capEX been given, does is mean the increase in working capital is zero as well?

  • @rickjacoby4542
    @rickjacoby4542 8 років тому +1

    Not sure why you won't just use EBITDA instead of EBIT but videos are great.

    • @Pain420
      @Pain420 5 років тому

      I think depreciation is a non-cash expense so the tax shield does not apply to it. Add back depreciation after multiplying EBIT by (1-t) because depreciation is non-taxable.

  • @khushpindersingh686
    @khushpindersingh686 8 років тому +4

    The tax rate is applicable on EBT. I suppose this is an example for illustrative purpose.

    • @satyam7299
      @satyam7299 5 років тому

      This was my concern too... But he kinda explained a bit of it mid-video..
      Pay close attention from 2:50 or so

  • @niteshsonar9458
    @niteshsonar9458 5 років тому

    Sir, why we are not considering the tax being saved on interest expenses as we will not pay the tax that is saved from interest expenses and the whole amount will be available for the lenders and the equity holders

  • @freebarry6155
    @freebarry6155 5 років тому

    Say you have a negative change in NWC. Would that be added back into FCF?

  • @salmahazem5850
    @salmahazem5850 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much you're the best

  • @mohamedfaye2017
    @mohamedfaye2017 5 років тому

    Great video. Thanks for the value!!

  • @ofir-bar-softr
    @ofir-bar-softr 4 роки тому

    Why do we care about the change in Net Working Capital? How it comes into play?
    And regarding Depreciation, why is Amortization being left behind? It usually comes together in such cases isn't it?

    • @nlcc09
      @nlcc09 3 роки тому

      Changes in working capital signals either decrease or increas in cash for example when trade payable decrease it means u hv paid hence decrease in cash

    • @nlcc09
      @nlcc09 3 роки тому

      Amortization is also taken into account just like depreciation. Depends with what you are given

  • @leonyin83
    @leonyin83 3 роки тому +1

    you are god-send

  • @primebkpr
    @primebkpr Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @bob6168able
    @bob6168able 4 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @lauraalejandra8764
    @lauraalejandra8764 7 років тому

    excellent video !! thanks

  • @MaartenvanRossemLezingen
    @MaartenvanRossemLezingen 7 років тому +3

    What's the point of knowing a company's free cash flow?

    • @worldshaper1723
      @worldshaper1723 7 років тому

      Maarten van Rossem Lezingen Because Free Cash Flow * 5 = The Value of your company.

    • @Oetti
      @Oetti 7 років тому

      said Kevin O'Leary once or twice, *depending on the type of company*

    • @burakakyon4319
      @burakakyon4319 4 роки тому

      Great! It is an excellent and fundamental question. As Warren Buffet suggests that accounting can be very speculative and far away from the truth. For example, companies can show profit in a year by using the magical hands of accounting. The free cash flow is basically showing the cash that left over, after paying and deducting all of its expense. It is very good method to understand whether company is healthy or not.

  • @fredweasley6182
    @fredweasley6182 8 років тому +33

    You sound like you'd be a country singer.

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  8 років тому +11

      lol, I don't think you want to hear me sing!

  • @zena-zena-zena
    @zena-zena-zena 8 років тому

    Thank you very much very helpful 👍🏽

  • @kelseysobomehin6416
    @kelseysobomehin6416 6 років тому

    Thank you, thank you, thank you!

  • @NatureandSpirit111
    @NatureandSpirit111 2 роки тому

    Can you take net income and add the taxes back in?

  • @EOCmodernRS
    @EOCmodernRS 5 років тому

    I got an excercise today without any revenue, and without any capex. What do I do?

  • @mozpassion8996
    @mozpassion8996 6 років тому +1

    What if there is a decrease in NWC?

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  6 років тому +1

      You'd simply be subtracting a negative number, or adding the difference. Good question Pk!

    • @mozpassion8996
      @mozpassion8996 6 років тому

      So to calculate the inc NFA I have to do the NFA for both years? Then subtract one to the other? Sorry didnt understand very well. NFA Y2- NFA Y1?

  • @Firekid144
    @Firekid144 5 років тому

    You are Harvard level my friend, very well explained!!

  • @chanbla11mit
    @chanbla11mit 5 років тому

    Thanks Homer

  • @Clifffffffffford
    @Clifffffffffford 6 років тому

    Thanks!

  • @ntcuong01ct1
    @ntcuong01ct1 2 роки тому

    Dear Friends, In reality with the chain of shop, we can calculate the FCF for each shop and calculate FCF of the chain. How do you think?

  • @mjassar8603
    @mjassar8603 6 років тому +2

    thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaank u !!!!

  • @mustaphamekhatria
    @mustaphamekhatria 10 років тому

    Nice video :)

  • @nitinbhalla3391
    @nitinbhalla3391 4 роки тому

    Free Cash Flow (Best One)

  • @Clifffffffffford
    @Clifffffffffford 6 років тому +1

    👍

  • @mariohorvat6198
    @mariohorvat6198 6 років тому +2

    best fcking explenation hala luya

  • @fritzki1
    @fritzki1 4 роки тому

    Hi. I thought net working capital includes cash?

  • @asinicalnarcissist9520
    @asinicalnarcissist9520 3 роки тому

    rip my uni grades

  • @nitinbhalla3391
    @nitinbhalla3391 3 роки тому

    Corporate valuation

  • @Miossoty1
    @Miossoty1 5 років тому

    Sigh...

  • @jamesfeldman4234
    @jamesfeldman4234 5 років тому +2

    Don't believe this video. Cash flows aren't going to be "free." It takes a lot of work and effort to generate cash flows.

  • @GetRich101
    @GetRich101 2 роки тому

    I have used 2 FCF Methods
    One from this video and the other form Jaime's youtube channel
    From this video's method I got FCF of -19 Million
    From Edspira's method I got FCF of 6.5 Million
    LMAO 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @jomsurangphongphanich6606
    @jomsurangphongphanich6606 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @mozpassion8996
    @mozpassion8996 6 років тому

    What if there is a decrease in NWC?