DAMN! I was trying to understand what you were telling me and now I see what you mean. I will work with these settings and post a video of my chassis working with these settings. But first I will lube everything up with the Silkroil that you sent me cause it looks like it will need it.
Sounds good, as I think you'll be very happy with the results..:) I'll also be posting a direct video comparison of Mach4 verse Pumotix later today showing the time difference in running the same G-code file which I feel will prove once again that this software is an amazing investment when considering the cost, and stability. Thank you, Vince
Vince, when you make a comparison video that features the speed difference in motor controlled software please use a Corvetteguy50 CNC Autonomous Fan Controller especially when the results depend somewhat on hearing the sound produced by a real time motor bench test. :-)
Hey Mick, thank you for your support. Its possible to run a single client of Pumtoix to control multiple systems as discussed here. doc.pumotix.ru/display/PUMENG/Connection+of+several+Clients+to+one+Server The module has additional cost, but is available. Here's the link. Its under common functions. Scroll down to the multiple client option pumotix.com/#packages Thank you, Vince
Speed is one thing, another things is path tolerances. I bet with you that you can make UCCNC faster if you set the tolerances higher. So, in my opinion the test is meaningless except if the path tolerances the 2 software you comparing is the same. In Mach3/4 you cannot even set the path tolerance, so they are kind of a toy compared to UCCNC. I don't know how it works with the Pumotix though, but a real-world proper comparion is only if they make the same path tolerances.
While I can understand some of what you're saying, you are speaking a tad too fast for this old British PhD brain. A simple summary would help me & probably others in some new text. I have watched a couple of your videos but not the 250+! After 7 years with a bad knee injury, I'm trying to get a new machine refitted from the LPT D25 era. I was royally screwed by our asian friends despite providing everything to upgrade it for full compliance. I have a few connections to finish, but can get the basic system up & running with Mach3, Vectric, but this Pumotix/Pure Motion software is new to me. I have not checked your ebay offers, but notice that CNC is missing from some lines of text just before those links. Is this significant? Lastly could you list line by line your mechanical set ups and software cutting times in the order longest to shortest times. I did notice the lack of smooth motion in Mach3 & 4, so after I get the basics set up & tested here I can look at a gradual upgrade. I agree that reducing a 12h cut to 9 hours is quite an improvement. Thanks & well done!
Thank you for your support. I apologize for speaking to fast. Pumotix unfortunately is no longer available to be sold due to the issues in that part of the world. Mach3, and Mach4 shouldn't have any issues with providing smooth motion pending the mechanics of your robot are setup correctly, along with the controller being built properly. I would start reviewing those areas first in great detail. Thank you, Vince
Thank you for your support. Yea, I'll be doing another software comparison between Mach4, and Pumotix on running the Roadrunner G-code to show the time difference. Thank you, Vince
@@corvetteguy50 Wiring video would be nice . My only apprehension is all that wiring work from removing the ethernet controller I have now and replacing it . That ethernet controller also powers the VFD.
Here's my video on connecting the PLCM-E1B. This unit requires a breakout board to be used, and my package is plug, and play the way I supply it. ua-cam.com/video/0sSELla1wZE/v-deo.html Thank you, Vince
DAMN! I was trying to understand what you were telling me and now I see what you mean. I will work with these settings and post a video of my chassis working with these settings. But first I will lube everything up with the Silkroil that you sent me cause it looks like it will need it.
Sounds good, as I think you'll be very happy with the results..:) I'll also be posting a direct video comparison of Mach4 verse Pumotix later today showing the time difference in running the same G-code file which I feel will prove once again that this software is an amazing investment when considering the cost, and stability. Thank you,
Vince
Vince, when you make a comparison video that features the speed difference in motor controlled software please use a Corvetteguy50 CNC Autonomous Fan Controller especially when the results depend somewhat on hearing the sound produced by a real time motor bench test. :-)
Hey John, Thank you for your support, and will do..:) Thank you,
Vince
milliion dollar question using pumotix and a ethernet hub could you run 2 tables simultaniously of the 1 pc??
Hey Mick, thank you for your support. Its possible to run a single client of Pumtoix to control multiple systems as discussed here. doc.pumotix.ru/display/PUMENG/Connection+of+several+Clients+to+one+Server
The module has additional cost, but is available. Here's the link. Its under common functions. Scroll down to the multiple client option pumotix.com/#packages
Thank you,
Vince
Speed is one thing, another things is path tolerances. I bet with you that you can make UCCNC faster if you set the tolerances higher. So, in my opinion the test is meaningless except if the path tolerances the 2 software you comparing is the same. In Mach3/4 you cannot even set the path tolerance, so they are kind of a toy compared to UCCNC. I don't know how it works with the Pumotix though, but a real-world proper comparion is only if they make the same path tolerances.
While I can understand some of what you're saying, you are speaking a tad too fast for this old British PhD brain. A simple summary would help me & probably others in some new text. I have watched a couple of your videos but not the 250+! After 7 years with a bad knee injury, I'm trying to get a new machine refitted from the LPT D25 era. I was royally screwed by our asian friends despite providing everything to upgrade it for full compliance. I have a few connections to finish, but can get the basic system up & running with Mach3, Vectric, but this Pumotix/Pure Motion software is new to me. I have not checked your ebay offers, but notice that CNC is missing from some lines of text just before those links. Is this significant? Lastly could you list line by line your mechanical set ups and software cutting times in the order longest to shortest times. I did notice the lack of smooth motion in Mach3 & 4, so after I get the basics set up & tested here I can look at a gradual upgrade. I agree that reducing a 12h cut to 9 hours is quite an improvement. Thanks & well done!
Thank you for your support. I apologize for speaking to fast. Pumotix unfortunately is no longer available to be sold due to the issues in that part of the world. Mach3, and Mach4 shouldn't have any issues with providing smooth motion pending the mechanics of your robot are setup correctly, along with the controller being built properly. I would start reviewing those areas first in great detail. Thank you,
Vince
🙌
mach3 and 4 have issues with constant velocity . I have to set mine to absolute stops .
Thank you for your support. Yea, I'll be doing another software comparison between Mach4, and Pumotix on running the Roadrunner G-code to show the time difference. Thank you,
Vince
@@corvetteguy50 Wiring video would be nice . My only apprehension is all that wiring work from removing the ethernet controller I have now and replacing it . That ethernet controller also powers the VFD.
Here's my video on connecting the PLCM-E1B. This unit requires a breakout board to be used, and my package is plug, and play the way I supply it. ua-cam.com/video/0sSELla1wZE/v-deo.html
Thank you,
Vince
🤗
😁
😂
🙌
🤗
😁
😂
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
🙌
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
😍
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗
🤗