Heating Plant Demo 6: East Wall - South

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @KANGAX666
    @KANGAX666 9 місяців тому

    I don't care how long rhis will take,but industrial demolitions seem to be the most interesting demolitions😂
    Nice videos so far John,like always!

  • @tonischuster2751
    @tonischuster2751 9 місяців тому +3

    Der Baggerfahrer muss vermutlich ein Anfänger sein er weiss nie wo er weitermachen soll. Es dauert ewig bei diesem Tempo. Auch ist die Zange zu klein und nicht geeignet für die Stahlträger.

    • @widmermax19
      @widmermax19 9 місяців тому

      so etwas von Ifezients habe ich noch nie gesehen, der braucht dazu ja ewig, vielleicht halt Ami typisch, null ausbildung..unter dem motto ..nu mach mal..

  • @cdarting91
    @cdarting91 9 місяців тому

    That attachment sure can spin!!!

  • @constructionwatcher5381
    @constructionwatcher5381 9 місяців тому

    Very interesting structure. Steel frame, with that heavy brick exterior wall that doesn't seem to be tied to the steel at all. Then the clay tile interior walls seem to totally enclose the steel frame. So most of the frame didn't need fireproofing, or wasn't that a thing when this was built?

    • @JohnZWetmore
      @JohnZWetmore  9 місяців тому

      The vertical steel columns are embedded in the exterior brick wall, except at the corners shown in this part, where they are only half embedded. Combined with larger spacing between columns at the ends, and you have a large section of wall left without lateral support.
      The entire exterior brick wall is lined with structural clay tile on the inside. On the north and south sides, the clay tiles are up against the brick. On the east and west ends, where a jog in the wall at the corner separates the steel from the brick wall, there is a gap between the brick and the tiles to accommodate the horizontal steel elements.
      Structural clay tiles have been used for fireproofing steel since the 1880s. However, as you note, much of the interior steel does not seem to have any fireproofing in this building, except for a few beams embedded in concrete. Perhaps building codes did not require it for this type of industrial building.

    • @constructionwatcher5381
      @constructionwatcher5381 9 місяців тому

      Very interesting. Thanks, John.

    • @TomGuimond
      @TomGuimond 9 місяців тому

      ​@@JohnZWetmore We have the impression that it is a new operator because the operator in this video seems to handle the machine less well than in the previous videos where the operator handled the machine with authority (I absolutely do not criticize this operator but I only show that he seems to have less experience with the machine)

  • @GlennStringer
    @GlennStringer 9 місяців тому +4

    Driver ( operator) must be first timer ,,😮

  • @constructionwatcher5381
    @constructionwatcher5381 9 місяців тому

    Wow, this is great! They are letting people who always wanted to run big equipment but never got an opportunity do it. What a great idea. There must be a lot of demand for that. I wonder how much they charge? Is it too late to sign up for this?

  • @cdarting91
    @cdarting91 9 місяців тому

    1:33:54 Oops! Is there something off about the tool they are using this time? Seems like this companies high reach is usually a lot stronger.

  • @chrisbartrum3201
    @chrisbartrum3201 9 місяців тому

    Close up's are superb, can really appreciate how thick them walls are and the million hours it would take to demolish by hand. Thanks, JZW. Oh! and that's got to be a change of operator. He makes the dragon roar. And just one more; that would be one hell of a collaboration with the operator in the second half. The guy/gal? his age, experience, how he got into the business, his perspective on the demolition. Great vid.

  • @andyhughes5885
    @andyhughes5885 9 місяців тому +2

    I simply can`t watch this series of videos, that operator is taking far too long and frustration to watch. Roll on, the next batch if videos John.

    • @JohnZWetmore
      @JohnZWetmore  9 місяців тому +2

      I've already filmed 7 more parts waiting to be edited. You might want to watch some reruns of other series for a while.

    • @TomGuimond
      @TomGuimond 9 місяців тому

      ​@@JohnZWetmore Is this me who is wrong or is it this orange excavator not equipped with the same shear as in part 2

    • @NicolasGasnier
      @NicolasGasnier 9 місяців тому

      @@JohnZWetmore Keep on ! It is a bit long but we have the time to appreciate the content of the building. Its as interesting as the demolition itself, hope to see the boilers and turbine hall etc. And that make big cliffhangers for satisfying moments like @1:33:50.

    • @NicolasGasnier
      @NicolasGasnier 9 місяців тому

      @@TomGuimond yes I think he changed the concrete crusher for a steel cutter. a bit weak for big IPNs but still more useful.

  • @duncancurtis5108
    @duncancurtis5108 9 місяців тому

    Wheee down goes the wall bang thud.

  • @widmermax19
    @widmermax19 9 місяців тому

    Das ist der schlechteste Baggerfahre den ich erlebt habe, der arbeitet total ohne kozept, aber hauptsache er kan die zange drehen

  • @widmermax19
    @widmermax19 9 місяців тому

    Mister rotating head

  • @trh4246
    @trh4246 7 місяців тому

    This operator is way too painful to watch anymore! How does he keep his job? His boss should have him sit down and watch 20 hours of competent demolition operators on this channel before he goes back out on a job. "Crunch and spin" just isn't a productive way to tear a wall down.

  • @lindaboguslawske3996
    @lindaboguslawske3996 4 місяці тому

    wrong tool for job

  • @inescividanes2403
    @inescividanes2403 9 місяців тому +1

    Operador fraquissimo. Naõ sabe o que fazer. Qualquer operador normal já teria feito setenta por cento mais servivo que esse lerdo. Fico nervoso em ver um operador trabalhador dessa maneira. Porisso estou deligando o meu computador.