SA04: Truss Analysis: Method of Joints

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 160

  • @MK2EA
    @MK2EA 10 років тому +27

    Thank you so much, it amazes me i can get these sort of resources online for free! If it wasn't for people like you i would have never got into university, thanks again!

  • @sashank14311
    @sashank14311 4 роки тому +2

    Watch this video for 1st time and instantly became a fan of this channel.
    Great content and description.
    Thank you

  • @joelestoesta576
    @joelestoesta576 8 років тому +2

    I was expecting a hard time reviewing method of joints, but when I saw this vid, I am grateful, thanks a lot Dr. structure. This 20 min tutorial is far more helpful than my instructor's one and a half lecture with sarcasm!!!

    • @khinchiaaliya2525
      @khinchiaaliya2525 4 роки тому +1

      same here

    • @venkatesh2285
      @venkatesh2285 2 роки тому +1

      Don't judge a book by its cover. Dr.structure channel is excellent one no doubt at all. At the same time you can't except the same quality of lecture delivery in classroom as it depends on lot of factors like time constraints, non availability of resources like smartboard etc., in board presentation it is very difficult to make understand the concepts through visualisations it is all because of lack of resources in education institutions.

  • @Abdisabir
    @Abdisabir 8 років тому

    This is the synthetic meaning of Engineering! I do Thank you- Whoever prepared and sacrificed his time for this valuable asset. We do solve the problems not for ourselves only, but for the Mankind too. You've reminded me of the Engineering aesthetics. Keep on keeping on!

  • @marwatalal1450
    @marwatalal1450 8 років тому +1

    Thank you so much madam , it's been a year since i started studying engineering mechanics and i swear i haven't understood a word , but now i got it.. thanks alot ..

  • @ahamadromen
    @ahamadromen 6 років тому +3

    I wish all instructors are such great in explanation and help.

    • @rubaalsaeed5790
      @rubaalsaeed5790 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/-24-43dN_2c/v-deo.html
      could you support me

  • @douglaso9397
    @douglaso9397 9 років тому +9

    Short. Fast. Effective. Thank you!

  • @wassunoor8678
    @wassunoor8678 8 років тому +8

    finally I got good marks in structural analysis.. awesome teaching... plz make videos which are specifically for civil engineering...

  • @vincenguyen6137
    @vincenguyen6137 3 роки тому +3

    I knew in this case cos 45 = sin 45. However, to be consistent in derivering a equation, equation (5) maybe wriiten as Sum Fx=Fbc cos45 - Fac cos45 + 5 = 0.

    • @jabertagi3857
      @jabertagi3857 3 роки тому +1

      I thought so, she got 5 and 6 sins and cosins mixed up, but doesn't affect answer

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  3 роки тому

      Correct.
      Please see the updated version of the lecture in the course referenced in the video description field.

  • @DrStructure
    @DrStructure  9 років тому +8

    Jide Olagunju You probably have made a sign error in your solution. BC is a compressive member and AC and AB are tensile members. The sign does matter as the design of a compression member is different than that of a tension member.

    • @farahahmed8225
      @farahahmed8225 8 років тому

      thnk U sir may U explain us RCC concrete design

    • @zinetkaplan799
      @zinetkaplan799 5 років тому

      please get in Turkish subtitles

  • @rustystove8410
    @rustystove8410 4 роки тому +1

    There are lots of pin jointed strictures out there. The most famous is there new World Trace Center building in the US. It has steel and concrete pin joints! The CN Tower in Torontoe CANDA has something lie 300 concrtee pin jpoints and theyt solev it use matrices for the deflectrions to prevent crackign in tension!

  • @swapnil9878
    @swapnil9878 10 років тому

    great information about trusses so far....excellent..thanks from india

  • @andjelaandjela583
    @andjelaandjela583 8 років тому +1

    Great explanations and lectures!

  • @jacobedwards9706
    @jacobedwards9706 8 років тому +13

    @12:37, i think you have your sin and cos mixed... not that it makes a difference with 45 degrees though.

    • @jacobedwards9706
      @jacobedwards9706 8 років тому

      unless your angle is between the members instead of what your diagram is showing

    • @abdisalammohamedelmi854
      @abdisalammohamedelmi854 7 років тому +1

      jacob edwards Yeah sure agree with ya.

    • @ricardofreshley3145
      @ricardofreshley3145 5 років тому

      I was over here bugging out over this lol

    • @samh4466
      @samh4466 4 роки тому

      Yeah i have the same issue too

  • @bunhengpreap5645
    @bunhengpreap5645 6 років тому +2

    Thanks for your lesson...👍👍👍

  • @MissPiggyM976
    @MissPiggyM976 Рік тому

    Thank you very much, it's so useful for me!

  • @moh.faizaljalani4074
    @moh.faizaljalani4074 4 роки тому

    Im confused at joint c (at 12:37) where angle 45 above line Fac, so the angle of Fac is also 45 since they are perpendicular 45+45=90. is this correct? I need to know if my assumption is right. please response :(

  • @Katie-uh8vg
    @Katie-uh8vg 6 років тому +1

    Why do you have forces at the supports in the y-direction when you don't have any applied forces in the y-direction?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  6 років тому

      Generally speaking, the absence of an applied force in a direction (say, the y-direction) does not imply reaction forces in that direction don't develop. In fact, in most cases couple of vertical reaction forces need to develop in order to ensure that the sum of the moments adds up to zero.

  • @NeonPinkClouds
    @NeonPinkClouds 7 років тому

    at 12:25 why did you write a positive "FbcSin45", arent you assuming that member is in compression so it should be "-FbcSin45", I've always had MAJOR difficulties with the sign of members, please help! D:

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      Two comments here:
      1. All the members are assumed to be in tension. That is why the forces are pointing away from the joint. If the force was assumed to be compressive, it would had pointed the other way, toward joint C.
      2. When we are writing the equilibrium equations, we don't pay attention to tension or compression issue. We pay attention only to the direction of the force based on the established coordinate system. Here, we assumed x is positive to the right. This is not to be confused with a tension force. Here, we are just establishing the positive direction of our coordinate system. We are basically saying, "for the purpose of writing the equilibrium equation, any force that points to the right is positive, and any force pointing to the left is negative. This way, we know what to add and what to subtract when we are finding the algebraic sum of the forces at the joint.

    • @NeonPinkClouds
      @NeonPinkClouds 7 років тому

      Don't you mean all members pointing away from the point are in compression and all members pointing towards the point are in tension? i'm so confused, sorry

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      No.
      If a member (say, AB) is in tension, then the axial force shown at ends of the member are pulling away, pointing away from the ends. That is how we show a tensile force in a member.
      But, we need to draw a different free-body diagram for the end joints. So, the member is on a different free-body diagram than its end joints.
      Looking at the free-body diagram of joint A:
      The axial force in AB acting at the joint must have a direction opposite to the force drawn on the member itself. So, if the force on the member is pulling away (if it is a tension force), then the same force acting at joint A must also pull away from the joint.
      Tension forces are always pull away from the ends of the member, and the joints. Compression forces are opposite in direction to tension forces, at the ends of the members and at the joints.

    • @NeonPinkClouds
      @NeonPinkClouds 7 років тому

      Dr. Structure oh so in simple words, you were drawing the connection between the joints and the members. and if a is in tension, the direction of the force is going towards the joint but at the joint the direction of the force is pulling away, therefore connecting with the member so it balances out? ive never seen this method before, sorry

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      Yes, you got it!

  • @mmdandf
    @mmdandf 9 років тому

    Thanks for your work, it really makes things easier.

  • @lordbatuhansyn
    @lordbatuhansyn 7 років тому +7

    There was a mistake
    When you find Equilibrium of x you wrote the equation =sin ( 45 ) it must be cos (45) .
    For this question sin45 = cos45 these are same and it change nothing but when people try to understand they will confuse

  • @umerjavaid6261
    @umerjavaid6261 7 років тому

    thank you for saving my life doc

  • @YASHWANTKUMAR-nf6gn
    @YASHWANTKUMAR-nf6gn 5 років тому +2

    Amazing....

  • @TheDeftonesmusic
    @TheDeftonesmusic 9 років тому +2

    extremely ultra helpful.thanks.i appreiciate your work

  • @hiporikonachi
    @hiporikonachi 8 років тому +1

    Hi, what software are you using to make the video? that is the pen cartoon as you write and the cartoon face with the voice?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому

      VideoScribe for text animation
      CrazyTalk for voice/face sync

  • @supertv2783
    @supertv2783 9 років тому

    Thank you Dr. Structure it is so great videos...

  • @royarmstrong646
    @royarmstrong646 9 років тому

    At the time of 12:50 of the video, why do you use sin with the sum of all forces in the x-direction and cos with the sum of all forces in the y-direction? I thought it was the other way around.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      It depends on the angle being used for writing the equilibrium equations. We either use the angle between the member and the x-axis or the angle between the member and the y-axis. Here, the angle between the force and the y-axis was used.

  • @twentyonetwos3967
    @twentyonetwos3967 8 років тому +2

    Very informative, but I struggle to see how you arrive at the 3.55NMs in equation 5 and 6.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому +3

      +Twentyone twos Yes, the value is a bit off. It should be 3.54 ( 5/(2*0.707)).

  • @quemaspana
    @quemaspana 10 років тому +1

    I appreciate the film. Very nicely done. It taught me well.

  • @sandeepdeepu6188
    @sandeepdeepu6188 5 років тому +1

    how did you label tension and compression forces ??

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  5 років тому

      When drawing a truss member in tension, we always show the internal (tension) force acting along the center-line of the member, pointing away from the member (pulling it). Since the member has two ends, we show the (pulling) force acting at both ends.
      The same (tension) force, when drawn at the joint, also needs to be shown pointing away from the joint.
      The sum of the tension force shown at the end of the member and the same force shown acting at the joint should be zero. Meaning, the two forces need to point toward each other (in the case of tension) or away from each other (in the case of compression).

    • @sandeepdeepu6188
      @sandeepdeepu6188 5 років тому +1

      @@DrStructure Thanks a lot

  • @binhtrinh9938
    @binhtrinh9938 7 років тому +1

    Have you video about analyst internal forces of members by Bow's notation methods?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      No, we don't, not at the present time.

  • @ameyakamat4985
    @ameyakamat4985 9 років тому +1

    Hello Dr., I can always work out the reactions before hand and then start working out from the corner right?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +1

      Ameya Kamat Yes, you can certainly approach the problem that way. It is generally a faster technique, if you know what you are doing.

  • @ChuTheHuan
    @ChuTheHuan 10 років тому +1

    great instruction, thank you very much !

  • @travisearnshaw8287
    @travisearnshaw8287 4 роки тому +1

    How do you get 3.55 from equations 5 and 6?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  4 роки тому +1

      It should have been written as 3.54, not 3.55.
      5/(2*0.7071) = 3.5355 ~ 3.54

    • @travisearnshaw8287
      @travisearnshaw8287 4 роки тому +1

      @@DrStructure thank you alot, that makes sense now

  • @luisalves1969
    @luisalves1969 9 років тому +5

    which sofwtare name used?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +10

      Several software systems are being used.The main ones are:
      Camtesia Studio for compiling and creating final videos, VideoScribe for generating text (writing) animations and CrazyTalk for character animation and lip-synching.

  • @amitbhatte5621
    @amitbhatte5621 8 років тому +1

    nice explanation, excellent way you teach. pl. continue with diff analytical. do you have any analytical on finding natural frequencies of structures. pl. guide.

  • @zaidradwan4000
    @zaidradwan4000 5 років тому +2

    Thanx

  • @fathereshark8421
    @fathereshark8421 2 роки тому

    How do you know if the Fx/Fy force is cos or sin?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  2 роки тому

      It depends on the angle we are using to determine Fx and Fy.
      Let’s refer to the side of the right triangle along the x-axis as X and call the side along the y-axis Y.
      If we are using the angle facing X to do the calculations, we need to use the sine of the angle to determine Fx and cosine of the angle to determine Fy.
      If we are using the angle facing Y to do the calculations, we need to use cosine of the angle to determine Fx and sine of the angle to determine Fy.

  • @olajideolagunju9038
    @olajideolagunju9038 9 років тому

    Hi Dr. Structure, I tried solving the problem assuming tension for AC, AB and BC. after I finished solving, I got tension for AC, and BC but compression for AB. I got all the same values you got but that was the only difference. Is my answer wrong for this? Or does it matter? Thanks for your reply in advance

  • @accessuploads7834
    @accessuploads7834 6 років тому +2

    It is clarified

  • @karenmatimura4821
    @karenmatimura4821 5 років тому +3

    Ohhhh I love you 😩😩😩

  • @mmdandf
    @mmdandf 9 років тому

    I do not get one thing? Why do you say it automatically satisfies the moment equilibrium when you have a vertical reaction there?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      mmdandf Yes, an (isolated) truss joint could be subjected to multiple forces (vertical, horizontal or inclined), but since they all pass through the joint no bending moment develops about the joint. Therefore, the moment equation for a typical truss joint becomes: 0 = 0. The same is true for an (isolated) truss member.
      Obviously if we did not isolate the truss joints, if we consider the truss as a whole, then the moment equilibrium equation could have non-zero terms.

  • @bahaahc618
    @bahaahc618 9 років тому

    Tnx alottt u r my statics hero

  • @Hobbit183
    @Hobbit183 6 років тому +3

    That was super neat, thank you 🙃

  • @accessuploads7834
    @accessuploads7834 6 років тому +2

    thanks a lot

  • @abdullahalsalboukh7438
    @abdullahalsalboukh7438 9 років тому

    You are the best. Thank you a lot :)

  • @simrandhonchic6138
    @simrandhonchic6138 8 років тому

    It helped me a lot.
    Thank you very much :)

  • @husnainhyder6713
    @husnainhyder6713 9 років тому +1

    i have enjoyed alot and learnt alot
    but please clearfy Fbc part is it in x direction forces are those with sin(45) or Cos(45)
    Thankyou

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +1

      +Husnain Hyder If we are using the angle that is facing the x-component of the force, then it is Sin(angle), otherwise it is Cos(angle).

    • @akuznet3798
      @akuznet3798 8 років тому

      I am also confused by this. What would Fbc be if the angle shown was not 45?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому

      Starting @12:34 The equation summing the forces in X direction is given as:
      Fbc sin(45) - Fac sin(45) + 5 = 0
      And the equation for Y direction is given as:
      -Fac cos(45) - Fbc cos(45) - Fcd = 0
      An there is a 45-degree angle labeled on the diagram.
      The angles used in the above two equations is not the angle labeled on the diagram. It is its complementary angle, which is also 45 degrees.
      If that complementary angle is anything but 45, say it is 30 degrees, then we need to used 30 degrees in the above equations.

    • @tonyt50
      @tonyt50 8 років тому +1

      Why are you using SIN for the forces in the X direction here, when in the example a few seconds before you were using COS in the X direction? Thank you

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому +1

      Since we have an isosceles right triangle here, sine and cosine can be used interchangeably.

  • @nequefruto7713
    @nequefruto7713 9 років тому

    the F(bc) tho in x direction should be cos(45). but the answer is correct since cos and sin are equal in 45deg angle.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому +1

      +ml12 There are two acute angles in a right triangle. We can use either angle to determine the x and y components of a force. If we use the angle between the hypotenuse and the base (along x axis), cosine is used for Fx and sine is used for Fy. However, if we use the acute angle between the hypotenuse and the vertical side of the triangle, then cosine has to be used for Fy and sine has to be used for Fx.

  • @kunal_chand
    @kunal_chand 7 років тому

    Why should not we apply force to the truss member itself . I think that should make us do the analysis of each whole member ,that is we will then solve the problem using Method Member . Please make video of Method of Members as well. Nice explanation given in thee rest of the videos.

    • @kunal_chand
      @kunal_chand 7 років тому

      sorry about the spelling mistake.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      By definition, truss members carry axial loads only. This means loads are applied only at the joints. If a member is directly subjected to transversal loads where a bending moment develops, it needs to be considered and analyzed as a beam.

  • @MrKINGKIDDO
    @MrKINGKIDDO 9 років тому

    Great video thank you for this

  • @aroyb-TECH
    @aroyb-TECH 8 років тому

    This is Brilliant work. Do you take donations for support?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому +1

      Thank you for your post. Currently, there is no mechanism in place for accepting donations in support of the work.

  • @Komain72
    @Komain72 10 років тому +1

    This was extremely helpful. I have a final on Saturday and although this is more work than I was taught in lectures, I feel as though this way of doing it makes way more sense than what I was taught and is fool-proof (if you can do basic equation solving :P) Thanks you very much! :)

  • @yukinatakashi6172
    @yukinatakashi6172 10 років тому +1

    Thank you very much

  • @y_p7
    @y_p7 7 років тому +1

    Thank you so much! !! You're a lifesaver

  • @rajakana3202
    @rajakana3202 10 років тому

    at the time 12.38 if u c u mention Fbc is sin but it should be cosine for x direction and same goes to Fac ..

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  10 років тому +1

      Here, the angle and its complementary angle are both 45 degrees. Depending on which angle you use, you get either sine or cosine of 45 degrees. Both formulations are correct.

  • @wklzai
    @wklzai 9 років тому

    can we calculate the support reaction forces first before we get into each of the joints?

  • @PBSumabat17
    @PBSumabat17 9 років тому

    may i ask, what if the distance of x's and y's are given, instead of using cos and sin, ?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      Sine and cosine of an angle are related to the sides of the right triangle that defines the angle. If x is the base of a right triangle and y is the height of it. Then the hypotenuse (R) is the square root of the sum of the squares of the side. Or,
      R*R = x*x + y*y
      If you know x and y, you can calculate R.
      If the angle of interest is between the base and the hypotenuse, then
      sine of the angle = y/R
      cosine of the angle = x/R
      If the angle is between the height and the hypotenuse, then
      sine of the angle = x/R
      cosine of the angle = y/R

    • @PBSumabat17
      @PBSumabat17 9 років тому

      Thanks :)

  • @awstout1
    @awstout1 10 років тому

    @ 16.22, how do you figure .707Fbc-.707Fac + 5 = 0
    becomes 3.55 N for both FAC & FBC how?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  10 років тому +2

      @16.22
      There are two equilibrium equations for joint C of the truss: Equation 5 (sum of the forces in the x direction = 0) and Equation 6 (sum of the forces in the y
      direction = 0). Here are the two equations:
      Equation 5: 0.707 Fbc - 0.707 Fac + 5 = 0
      Equation 6: -0.707 Fbc - 0.707 Fac = 0
      From Equation 6 we get: Fbc = -Fac.
      Substituting -Fac for Fbc in Equation 5, we get:
      -0.707 Fac - 0.707 Fac + 5 = 0.
      Solving this equation for Fac, we get (approximately) 3.55 N for Fac.

    • @BigOlRub
      @BigOlRub 10 років тому

      Dr. Structure
      Aren't they supposed to be 3.53606...
      the same with Fbd, it should be 2.83...

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  10 років тому

      Joshua de Jesús Yes, more accurately Fbc and Fac each should have a magnitude of 5/2 cos 45 = 3.54.
      And, Fbd = 3.54 cos 45 = 2.5

  • @nnixxpalomares4795
    @nnixxpalomares4795 9 років тому

    Dr. Structure how i know if i should use sin of cos in Fx and Fy?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      +Nnixx Palomares It depends on the angle you are using for calculating the x and y component of the force.
      Given a force vector, you can always construct a right triangle that has
      the force as its hypotenuse. The right triangle has three interior
      angles: a 90-degree angle and two smaller angles.
      Let's refer to the interior angle between the hypotenuse and the
      vertical side of the triangle as A and the interior angle between the
      hypotenuse and the horizontal side of the triangle as B.
      You can use either A or B to find the x and y components of the force
      (F).
      Using angle A:
      Fx = F sin(A)
      Fy = F cos(A).
      Using angle B:
      Fx = F cos(B)
      Fy = F sin(B).

    • @nnixxpalomares4795
      @nnixxpalomares4795 9 років тому

      +Dr. Structure ahhhhhh... okay =D that was very helpful =D
      because i have a problem here where i am solving for an scalene kind of triangle. BTW thanks a lot.

    • @nnixxpalomares4795
      @nnixxpalomares4795 9 років тому

      +Dr. Structure it confuses me because in this example problem you have 45deg angle but now i am enlightened haha =))

  • @nnixxpalomares4795
    @nnixxpalomares4795 9 років тому

    can i use this method if the bottom member is not in 180 deg ?

    • @nnixxpalomares4795
      @nnixxpalomares4795 9 років тому

      +Nnixx Palomares there are 2 members at the bottom but they are not in 180 deg.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      +Nnixx Palomares Yes, regardless of the geometry of the truss, the analysis technique works as long as the structure is statically determinate.

  • @eduforalledu4651
    @eduforalledu4651 7 років тому

    I need to know the name of this program please

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      I am not sure what you mean by the program. Please elaborate.

  • @tinashematimba6823
    @tinashematimba6823 9 років тому

    dr Structure is it possible that we directed a force to the x axis and use sin.l only know that sin is for the y axis ,cos for the x axis

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +1

      +Tinashe Matimba It depends on the angle you are using for calculating the x and y component of the force.
      Given a force vector, you can always construct a right triangle that has the force as its hypotenuse. The right triangle has three interior angles: a 90-degree angle and two smaller angles.
      Let's refer to the interior angle between the hypotenuse and the vertical side of the triangle as A and the interior angle between the hypotenuse and the horizontal side of the triangle as B.
      You can use either A or B to find the x and y components of the force (F).
      Using angle A:
      Fx = F sin(A)
      Fy = F cos(A).
      Using angle B:
      Fx = F cos(B)
      Fy = F sin(B).

    • @tinashematimba6823
      @tinashematimba6823 9 років тому

      thank you so much Dr Structure.looking forward to your posts

  • @kimerriobaugh77
    @kimerriobaugh77 9 років тому

    what if u do not have right angle triangles can the same approach taken?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +2

      There is always a right triangle.
      If we have an inclined truss member with know end positions, we can easily construct the right triangle needed for calculating the sine and cosine.
      If we know the end positions of the member, then we know the member's length. Make this length the hypotenuse of a right triangle. Since we know the end coordinates of the hypotenuse, we very easily determine the height and the base of the right triangle.
      Say a truss member has end coordinates (5,4) and (8,0). Then, the hypotenuse of the right triangle has a length of 5. The height of the triangle is 4 and the base of it is 3.

  • @mohamedalwrfi9305
    @mohamedalwrfi9305 8 років тому

    شكرا جزيلا

  • @donsamson4037
    @donsamson4037 7 років тому

    In the last example, why AC in tension while BC in compression?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      Intuitively, because the applied horizontal force tends to push on BC and pull on AC.

  • @christialjewelvergara9146
    @christialjewelvergara9146 7 років тому

    How do you get Fac=3.55N and Fbc=3.55N?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      5 / (2 cos(45)) = 3.54
      There discrepancy is due to round off error.

  • @explorecivilengineering9835
    @explorecivilengineering9835 7 років тому

    Dear sir how can we know that which member is in tension and which member is in compression?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      Before the analysis is done, we don't know which ones are in tension and which are in compression. By convention, we assume all the members to be in tension. That is why we show the force vectors pointing away from the members and the joints.
      If a computed member force turns out to be negative, we know that member is in compression. If the computed value is positive, the member indeed is in tension.

  • @kishore10a
    @kishore10a 8 років тому

    You have explained for a joint with only 2 unknowns .What will happen if a joint has 3 or more unknowns?Can we also solve the problem using the moment?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому

      If the truss is statically determinate, the system of equilibrium equations, when solved simultaneously, gives the values for all the member forces regardless of how many members are connected to a joint.
      You can always use the moment equilibrium equation to solve for one or more unknowns, but that is not called the method of joints. We can view it as a hybrid approach which, by the way, may prove to be faster for hand calculations in some cases.

    • @michaelpolowyszak122
      @michaelpolowyszak122 8 років тому

      If a joint has more than 2 unknowns it cant really be solved.

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому

      Not true. If a joint has more than two unknowns, but the truss is statically determinate, we can calculate all the member forces by solving the system of (joint) equilibrium equations.

  • @eng.elhosary8790
    @eng.elhosary8790 11 років тому +1

    Thanks

  • @maxameddahir4729
    @maxameddahir4729 7 років тому

    hi Dr. structure I would like to say thank u your tremendous effort showing as can you give me some name of books about mechinecs and structure that helping me to be expert structure

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  7 років тому

      Russell Hibbeler's books on statics and structural analysis are quite good.

  • @yenumovie3095
    @yenumovie3095 9 років тому

    how do we know the langthe of the two sides are equal .w/h is "l"?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      +yenus aminu That information is given to us.

  • @gurwindersingh3374
    @gurwindersingh3374 9 років тому

    how do we know the member is in tension or compression?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому +4

      Gurwinder singh At the beginning we assume all the members to be in tension, the internal force pointing away from the member's ends. If a calculated member force is negative, then in actuality the member is in compression. Otherwise, our initial assumption was correct, the member is indeed in tension.

    • @gurwindersingh3374
      @gurwindersingh3374 9 років тому +1

      Thank you dr structure . .this helped me a lot..great explanation..

  • @Alalpog
    @Alalpog 8 років тому +1

    thank you madam.

  • @slimmy666
    @slimmy666 8 років тому

    Oh I got confused !! in the beginning you made joint A Hinged and Joint B Pinned, then you switched it
    Thanks for this demonstration anyway :D

  • @eng763
    @eng763 5 років тому +1

    Good afternoon my dear can make UA-cam taking about finite element method

  • @uayemyintbago4496
    @uayemyintbago4496 8 років тому +1

    Grate Thanks

  • @astafzciba
    @astafzciba 8 років тому

    the the cartoon character looks so high, haha thank you so much for the explanation

  • @eng763
    @eng763 5 років тому +1

    Thinks my dear

  • @carlson2545
    @carlson2545 9 років тому

    shouldnt there be a zero force member at D

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  9 років тому

      +Carlson Ngolah Yes, CD is a zero-force member.

  • @duckyprime833
    @duckyprime833 8 років тому

    how to get ac=3.55n and bc too

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому

      Please elaborate. Not sure what you are asking.

  • @engrxiddig
    @engrxiddig 3 роки тому

    B+r=2j 3:00

  • @masoodzafar9731
    @masoodzafar9731 8 років тому

    thanks sir

  • @chruntola3181
    @chruntola3181 4 роки тому

    Hello Teacher please drop file pdf all lesson .Thank you very much Teacher.🙏❤

  • @azharulislam9443
    @azharulislam9443 6 років тому +2

    I need portable method of truss

  • @Mjida004
    @Mjida004 7 років тому +1

    thank u very much...

  • @Callisto314
    @Callisto314 8 років тому

    I'm confused, where did 0.707 come from?

    • @DrStructure
      @DrStructure  8 років тому +1

      +cumpleted mczella cos(45) = sin(45) = 0.707

  • @abdulrahmanradwan6167
    @abdulrahmanradwan6167 5 років тому +3

    Thanx