I kinda feel like you have to be a pedo to be affiliated with the oligarchs. They won't trust you otherwise since they won't have any blackmail to hold over you.
ur videos are some of the only art ones on UA-cam that aren’t boring, pretentious and ONLY FOCUSING ON ART (in other words, more how art affects the world, talking about it with other subjects) keep going, love to see more/longer videos thx
@@oscarlove4394 Be careful what you wish for...it may sound nice in theory, but when your family's heads are on the chopping block, you won't be so flippant about the power the white race has willingly forfeited. The West will probably resemble places like South Africa and Brazil in the future, or even a failed state like Haiti. It will be a miserable living Hell. The living will envy the dead. I hate the Anglophone technocratic globohomogenization empire as much as the next dissident, and I do view the collapse of this empire as inevitable, but I still dread the coming age of barbarism because I have family and I care about my race and, even if I am perfectly content to face my own death, I am terrified by the thought of extinction and the thought of my people (especially my close relatives and friends) having to live through a dark age in which whites are persona non grata and slavery and sectarian violence are the norm. It is no fun being a minority in a place that is filled with people who hold genocidal levels of contempt for you. Hell, it's bad enough being the majority in a place where the minorities have been conditioned to blame you for all their problems, imagine how bad it will be when black and Arab and South Asian people outnumber white people in Europe. I don't know, I'm making assumptions about you, maybe you're non-white and you really would celebrate white people getting beheaded for being infidels or whatever, maybe you are so driven by grievances against the British Empire (which, for all its evils, did essentially abolish slavery around most of the world) that you just want to see the West burn, but based on the general vibe of Art Chad's audience I kinda assumed you're probably a white person that is fed up with the direction Anglos have taken Western civilization in since WWI, and that there isn't a genuine wish to see blood in the streets entailed in your statement. Trouble is, people that have the best intentions often proclaim their humanitarian aims without realizing the disastrous impact their actions would have on such a systematic and sophisticated society. Like, for instance, the frequent refrain from environmentalists that we need to entirely cease the mining, refinement, and burning of fossil fuels immediately if we are going to stave off climate disaster (which is conveniently always looming around the corner, never actually showing itself in any kind of sea level rise or crop failures or dust bowls or whatever, which is what actually happened when the climate actually heated up rapidly for a stint during the 1930s, which is still the hottest decade on record) belies a deep naivete in their understanding of economics and how energy consumption relates to mortality rates and general quality of life. They don't grasp the multitude of ways in which we use fossil fuels, like to produce synthetize fertilizer to feed the billions of people on Earth that would not be able to be fed otherwise, or the fact that an insane number of uses have been developed for plastics that we don't have equally effective replacements for, I mean I don't know about you but I like doctors being able to use disposable syringes rather than using glass ones over and over. Billions would die if the whole world stopped using fossil fuels anytime soon, which would result in a far worse apocalypse than a scenario in which the global average temperature rises by a degree over the next century. I've gone off on a tangent but the underlying principle is the same: when asking for a change as dramatic as attempting fruitlessly to replace fossil fuels with wind and solar overnight (like by 2030, or even by 2050) or hoping for the collapse of the Anglophone globalist empire, one must consider what the ACTUAL result would be, rather than the ideal result they would merely WANT to happen. Things may have to get worse before they can get better, but it is also possible that things will just never get better and the decline is terminal, leading to cultural and racial extinction: going out with a whimper. It is weird to me how I'm cast as an "extremist" and "white supremacist" for caring about that, as if you have to believe your race is superior to be at all concerned about the potential for it to be wiped off the face of the Earth. A lot of people seem to have this deep-seated, irrational notion that white people are so naturally inclined towards a dominant role that the thought of them ever even being in the "oppressed" role rather than the "oppressor" role, even on an individual level, is laughable to them. I think a lot of normies actually harbor a sort of implicit, unspoken white supremacist mentality in the sense that they think white people are so dominant and powerful, we physically cannot go extinct, like it is spoken of as an impossibility. Humanity as a whole can be thought of as fragile enough for normies to believe it could go extinct, even during their lifetimes, but somehow a small subsection of humanity is thought of as so intrinsically powerful and invulnerable that anyone pointing to our low birth rates and using simple math to extrapolate into the future to show that we will dwindle away in a couple centuries tops at this rate is scoffed at and called a neo-Nazi conspiracy theorist. Even if none of us reproduce, somehow there will still be tons of white people in a thousand years. I've never seen a single sci-fi depiction of the future that depicts the West of the future as having anything close to realistic demographics, perhaps with the exception of Blade Runner 2049. The Camp of the Saints was a rather prescient book by a French author about mass immigration leading to whites becoming a minority in Europe and eventually ending up only in small mountain enclaves, far from the metropolises their ancestors built. I think that is a pretty realistic way to imagine the future. I believe the only white people that will survive the next century will be those that choose to group together into autonomous communities in rural areas, building walled and well-defended compounds in places that are hard to access by roads, far from the corrupted cities. They will be called every name in the book for their nonviolent efforts to simply survive in peace, as it will be a common view to believe that whites should not be entitled to owning property since they are "colonizers" and all that crap (but migrants somehow aren't "colonizers", of course, just like how the Arabs are never chastised for their Islamic imperialism and colonialism, and people pretend North Africa and the Middle East always had the demography they have today) and it is already enshrined in law that white people don't have any right to freedom of association. Hmm, wonder if this comment will stay up...
Here in Australia, we're going through a similar situation to the king with the wealthiest person in the country, Gina Rinehart. She had a hideous portrait exhibited in one of our national galleries. Since she is a major sponsor of her state's swimming organisation, she's been getting all of these elite swimmers to sign a petition to remove the portrait. All of these random athletes have been making public statements about how the painting is "deeply offensive" and all that. The funny thing is that the painting was basically unheard of until she started the petition, so there's a Streisand effect where there's only more and more coverage happening of the piece. Just goes to show how even multibillionaires are still as conceited and self-absorbed as we are.
Bruhhh I swear Australian politicians are the craziest bastards remember that time Tony ate a fucking raw onion and scomo shat himself in a maccas and John barilaro punched a cameraman and the guy who drowned and got a pool in his honour no wonder most Australians don't care about politics
That's funny, but it's not a similar situation. This one is an intentional and official portrait which they endorsed and are somewhat proud of despite public mockery; what you described is the public endorsing a painting that was interpreted to be mocking the subject, and precisely for that reason rather than in spite of that.
3:10 lol the excuse for visual dismemberment is 'to humanize'. Double-speak. Each portrait seems as an insult to the monarch. Disempowerment, by showing the monarch cannot complain, they have to smile and wave like the puppet they are.
My royal painting would have seen me rising out of the channel like a kaiju, blocking the shores of my “green and pleasant land” from a dozen dinghies.
This story slightly parallels the Gina Rinehart "portrait" in the National Gallery of Australia. The artist Vincent Namatjira portayed her as he saw her, and many others do too, and she's not happy about it. She has said some horrible things, especially concerning the indigenous people of Australia and the artist is indigenous and he portrayed her accordingly. She wants it removed and the gallery won't do it despite her having donated a lot to the gallery in the past. C'est la vie.
got here exactly one minute after the video was posted, decided to watch it before commenting, and here i am now, speechless. again. as a gen xer, i don't simply accept all and any authority as "natural". the xtreme radicalness of 90s saw very well to that, thank you. but, at the same time, i can't deny it's inextricably interwoven in human nature. maybe in all of nature? there's always someone leading any sort of group, however indirectly or informally, and even "irrational" animals understand that following the stronger/wiser is sometimes required for survival against common threats. so i think the world is ungovernable not because authority is useless per se, but because every. single. "king" and "queen" out there is aggressively naked and we can't (as in, lack the ability to) go on pretending otherwise. the rich and powerful have always used the rest of us to survive, but now they simply refuse to give back anything in return. it's unsustainable... right? it's 1789 all over again, methinks. the difference is i'm not sure what can replace the old "liberté, fraternité, egalité" motto when such ideas have been thoroughly emptied by the very people that ascended to power after that revolution of the "masses". life is certainly curious in this post-history period. oh, and thanks for reminding me (again) not to tap out.
And now everyone is finally waking up and not idolizing the rich, with the current cancellng and boycotting and mass blocking of influencers and stars. It is a reversal of "power" or power dynamic. It is about respect and control and finally taking the reigns and realizing that we have the control and that respect should be earned not just granted.
The belief that any time period is "post-history" is just 20th century chauvinism at its best. History never ends, and we never stop living in it. It is the story of mankind, and so long as man is in dominion over the earth, he will continue to make history. This civilization will eventually wither away and die, like all the others before it. We are not more virtuous than our ancestors simply because of our existence in the present. The ideals we hold dear, like republicanism or entrepreneurial fortune-seeking, are actually very old.
in other words, the leaders are not leading anymore... they want all the personal benefits of power with none of the responsibilities and directives. they have no vision but the continuation of their own rule, no grand empires to build, or some mortal enemy to defeat.... they have become complicit and soft.... abolish it, and build a new system out of the rubble. the motto of the post-liberal age would be one of Honour, Solidarity, and Strength. the lies of the liberal system has been exposed to all...
This reminds me back in 5th grade when our teacher said she shook the president's hand, and then the whole class wanted to shake her hand after that and how cool we all thought that was, but now if someone told me they were even within 10 feet of a politician i'd look at them like they just man-handled a dog turd.
@Michael-xr5yx I mean, King Charles objectively doesn't have any de facto power. He is purely a figurehead. The people actually in charge of the UK are people like the Rothschilds and other banking dynasties.
Monarchs in UK still have a lot of power. Part of it is soft power - most of the people living in the country (especially older people) support monarchy. By extension they support the king so he can influence a lot of people He's a head of the Anglican Church. Quite an important position He's rich af He technically can take control over UK. He doesn't really have to listen to the goverment. He and his mother just decided they'll allow the democratic system to rule in their name. From time to time the Royal Family uses it's power to do questionable stuff. There's this law in UK which forbids workplace discrimination. Guess who is exemt from it? If the king doesn't want to have black servants then he can just openly say he only accept white people for the job
The red is royal blood matrix that holds Charles the image, and his hands. The face and hands connote the idea Charles will be remembered by places and things changed by his appearance and work he did with his hands.
Jan 6th wasn't at The White House, it was at The Capitol. Come on Art Chad! I'm not even a yankee and I know that lol. & no mention of the cute lil butterfly in the painting?
4:38 man, Jack Layton had respect and likeabilty up to and including his final address before cancer took him election year. We’re in the worst timeline, but that man that once was the favourite and looked to be actually a broad advocate for workers’ rights, lives on in my heart as an example worth hoping for once more.
Either this is a different source or someone's analysis, but taking into account the "March of the Gladiator's" origin, the track was once made in image of the arrival of a mighty warrior. To the common folk, it sounds like proud mockery, thus its composition is used in circus... to poke fun and to represent that the ones in power serve for entertainment. A mocking way, but it depends who this person in power is. The painting looks like King Charles was in the blood of the actual good people. And then... RIP Queen Elizabeth, the fading style represents her death.
Was not expecting you to touch on the illusion of authority the way you did, right on man. Highly recommend you check out the book “The Most Dangerous Superstition” by Larken Rose if you haven’t. Much love man and keep it up.
This is the first video of yours that I watched. I am delightfully impressed, as well as morbidly depressed. That little reminder at the end that if I were to kill myself I would miss out surprisingly exactly what I needed to hear.
Good video. But I think you might be mischaracterizing your father's feelings about J6. It's not that the *people* are important, it's the institution that deserves respect. Putting your feet up on Pelosi's desk isn't offensive to her, it's offensive to the desk, and what it represents in the history of the American democratic experiment. That's what most old fools like me saw as disrespect. I don't think there's more than 3 or 4 people in the whole US congress who actually deserves respect, but the building, the institution, the ideas it represents and the job it has to do; these are worth respecting, no matter what group of monkeys happen to occupy those seats at any time.
Exactly this, it was a disgusting display of disrespect to their own country. (I'm not american) And more so that they didn't realize they were zombies directed by a corrupt millionaire, and he stood by and laughed as those pawns did his bidding.
I think the main problem is that they want to uproot democracy and put up an even more authoritarian regime... the framing of this video is completely wrong, the core of jan 6 wasn't "challenging authority" conservatives have literally been empirically shown to be more authoritarian, qnd I'm guessing there's a big overlap between that demographic and the jan 6 one.
Just like how a somoliet brought 3 dollar wine to a competition and made the 1st place, It really doesn't matter what a professional says. 😂 The masses are the general/collective interpreters. What they say matters most, doesn't it? After all you, reading; are one of them.
insanely good video i cant come up with a response.. but i do think its a good thing society is changing like that.. this is a total blindspot for me, paintings commisioned by the powerful.. the artist is the only thing linking the isolated wealth-society to the 'masses. finding a message that way sounds so fun.
what annoys me about it isn't even how obviously demonic it is, the honesty is almost refreshing - it's the lack of solidity to the painting, the red swirls seeming to merge with his clothing and to be ethereal, or like a gas. Only his face is solid. The ability to make any genuine representation or grounded communication to the viewer seems missing. And yet, it's simultaneously complicated and overdone. Like a meal that looks like a thrown together casserole yet tastes of a dozen excessively added spices. A lack of confidence, lack of meaning, and compensation therefor. A better painter would have said more with less.
I want to push back on the idea that no leader is respected. I live in china, people actually respect and like Xi Jin Ping. Support for the party is authentic and strong. .
2014 🤔 2024 🤪 these are actually postcodes as the fed is laundered through Australia 1066 is a postcode not a year that the family name goes back to. It’s where the postal Union is. A4 isn’t paper but a land transit route
"Drives beat up Mercedes" Shows Buffet's old, but mint condition, Cadillac. Also January 6th was not at the White House, which in a way proves your point about how you feel about it.
Funny enough this is all the tell tales of a dying decadent empire. We in the West have literally "had it too good for too long." Most of us can't even personally remember the last full scale drafting and all war that our nations had. Vietnam seems like from another age, the modern millennial and zoomer can't comprehend such a notion. This also shows how the host populas of a society loses ground. Physically and socially. People can't agree with what is roght or wrong , there is no "common sense". No people, no god, not even language. But when it all comes crumbling down and the barbarian hordes flood over the hills, the people will lnow terror and fear and pain and a collective unifying existential threat that is undeniable. THEN people will look for direction, a leader, power; and truly believe.
I guess i have a boomer mentality lol I thought Jan 6th was disgusting. Im millennial. People have the right to protest and question. And you should. But the people who did this love America, but they trash the very symbol of our republic? I dont like nancy, but i wouldnt disrespect the office she inhabited. The Speaker of the House has been here since the country was founded. It trascends us. Unfortunately the people who are elected rarely respects its weight.
We live in a republic founded by people who overthrew their old government in a violent revolution, all for imposing less than our current ones does. Respect is earned and lost,from their point of view, the republic and it's core values where killed and are being worn as a skin suit by people who openly despise, gaslight, befraud and belittle them. It is proof that enough against ghosts being able to alter the physical world that horrible accidents dont befall them often.
It's a huge country and frankly nobody is obligated to support a dystopian regime, this is what I don't like about this "oh only be rebellious every 50 years or so" as if you didn't have a whole country wide protest with burning buildings and riots beforehand.
@@IbnRushd-mv3fp The BLM riots also sucked. Two things can be true at once. America is not its government. America is an idea that transcends us. You can criticize our leaders, not the ideals of free and justice.
Check out today's sponsor www.aura.com/artchad to start your two-week free trial.
Chad
I like state power but only if I’m in control
My kinda ethics 🎉🎉🎉🎉
At least you are honest about it
@@Francesco-gf1sv I won’t be honest about it if im in power
This guy knows what’s up, id vote for him
@@eiavops4576 you would have voted for me anyways *wink*
For reference, the last painter to do a portrait of the Queen was outed as a pedo.
And I'm sure he was a dear friend of the establishment and a great contributor of their enterprises.
At this point man, I’d be more surprised if he wasn’t
So the royal art community is no different than the twitter art community
I kinda feel like you have to be a pedo to be affiliated with the oligarchs. They won't trust you otherwise since they won't have any blackmail to hold over you.
@@argnatornope, just an Aussie suck up
Personally I'm a big fan of the My Bloody Valentine Loveless King Charles portrait
love your videos and MBV. i hope this makes you realize you’re a niche internet micro-celebrity.
I'm not gonna kill myself.
Not sure about myself.
@@asrar-eo2tpdon’t
@@asrar-eo2tp dont. Love. (Also really cool picture you two got there)
ur videos are some of the only art ones on UA-cam that aren’t boring, pretentious and ONLY FOCUSING ON ART (in other words, more how art affects the world, talking about it with other subjects)
keep going, love to see more/longer videos
thx
He’s not annoying and/or pretentious either, very rare
Menacing portrait of a dying man
A moribund king for an undead empire. The UK is a pathetic shell of its former self and we all know it.
The portrait represents the weakness that monarchies were afflicted with after ww1
@@titanomachy2217 honestly i'm all for it. The english have run roughshod over the world for far too long.
it's a morose symbolism for the absolute state of Britain in 2024, sick and decrepit as the miasma swallows King Charles III, its avatar, whole.
@@oscarlove4394 Be careful what you wish for...it may sound nice in theory, but when your family's heads are on the chopping block, you won't be so flippant about the power the white race has willingly forfeited. The West will probably resemble places like South Africa and Brazil in the future, or even a failed state like Haiti. It will be a miserable living Hell. The living will envy the dead. I hate the Anglophone technocratic globohomogenization empire as much as the next dissident, and I do view the collapse of this empire as inevitable, but I still dread the coming age of barbarism because I have family and I care about my race and, even if I am perfectly content to face my own death, I am terrified by the thought of extinction and the thought of my people (especially my close relatives and friends) having to live through a dark age in which whites are persona non grata and slavery and sectarian violence are the norm. It is no fun being a minority in a place that is filled with people who hold genocidal levels of contempt for you. Hell, it's bad enough being the majority in a place where the minorities have been conditioned to blame you for all their problems, imagine how bad it will be when black and Arab and South Asian people outnumber white people in Europe. I don't know, I'm making assumptions about you, maybe you're non-white and you really would celebrate white people getting beheaded for being infidels or whatever, maybe you are so driven by grievances against the British Empire (which, for all its evils, did essentially abolish slavery around most of the world) that you just want to see the West burn, but based on the general vibe of Art Chad's audience I kinda assumed you're probably a white person that is fed up with the direction Anglos have taken Western civilization in since WWI, and that there isn't a genuine wish to see blood in the streets entailed in your statement. Trouble is, people that have the best intentions often proclaim their humanitarian aims without realizing the disastrous impact their actions would have on such a systematic and sophisticated society. Like, for instance, the frequent refrain from environmentalists that we need to entirely cease the mining, refinement, and burning of fossil fuels immediately if we are going to stave off climate disaster (which is conveniently always looming around the corner, never actually showing itself in any kind of sea level rise or crop failures or dust bowls or whatever, which is what actually happened when the climate actually heated up rapidly for a stint during the 1930s, which is still the hottest decade on record) belies a deep naivete in their understanding of economics and how energy consumption relates to mortality rates and general quality of life. They don't grasp the multitude of ways in which we use fossil fuels, like to produce synthetize fertilizer to feed the billions of people on Earth that would not be able to be fed otherwise, or the fact that an insane number of uses have been developed for plastics that we don't have equally effective replacements for, I mean I don't know about you but I like doctors being able to use disposable syringes rather than using glass ones over and over. Billions would die if the whole world stopped using fossil fuels anytime soon, which would result in a far worse apocalypse than a scenario in which the global average temperature rises by a degree over the next century. I've gone off on a tangent but the underlying principle is the same: when asking for a change as dramatic as attempting fruitlessly to replace fossil fuels with wind and solar overnight (like by 2030, or even by 2050) or hoping for the collapse of the Anglophone globalist empire, one must consider what the ACTUAL result would be, rather than the ideal result they would merely WANT to happen. Things may have to get worse before they can get better, but it is also possible that things will just never get better and the decline is terminal, leading to cultural and racial extinction: going out with a whimper. It is weird to me how I'm cast as an "extremist" and "white supremacist" for caring about that, as if you have to believe your race is superior to be at all concerned about the potential for it to be wiped off the face of the Earth. A lot of people seem to have this deep-seated, irrational notion that white people are so naturally inclined towards a dominant role that the thought of them ever even being in the "oppressed" role rather than the "oppressor" role, even on an individual level, is laughable to them. I think a lot of normies actually harbor a sort of implicit, unspoken white supremacist mentality in the sense that they think white people are so dominant and powerful, we physically cannot go extinct, like it is spoken of as an impossibility. Humanity as a whole can be thought of as fragile enough for normies to believe it could go extinct, even during their lifetimes, but somehow a small subsection of humanity is thought of as so intrinsically powerful and invulnerable that anyone pointing to our low birth rates and using simple math to extrapolate into the future to show that we will dwindle away in a couple centuries tops at this rate is scoffed at and called a neo-Nazi conspiracy theorist. Even if none of us reproduce, somehow there will still be tons of white people in a thousand years. I've never seen a single sci-fi depiction of the future that depicts the West of the future as having anything close to realistic demographics, perhaps with the exception of Blade Runner 2049. The Camp of the Saints was a rather prescient book by a French author about mass immigration leading to whites becoming a minority in Europe and eventually ending up only in small mountain enclaves, far from the metropolises their ancestors built. I think that is a pretty realistic way to imagine the future. I believe the only white people that will survive the next century will be those that choose to group together into autonomous communities in rural areas, building walled and well-defended compounds in places that are hard to access by roads, far from the corrupted cities. They will be called every name in the book for their nonviolent efforts to simply survive in peace, as it will be a common view to believe that whites should not be entitled to owning property since they are "colonizers" and all that crap (but migrants somehow aren't "colonizers", of course, just like how the Arabs are never chastised for their Islamic imperialism and colonialism, and people pretend North Africa and the Middle East always had the demography they have today) and it is already enshrined in law that white people don't have any right to freedom of association. Hmm, wonder if this comment will stay up...
We're all living in 2024 while this man is living in 2014
The World stopped in 2014
@@丨匚卄匚几 I wish
Lolllllll
The before times
@@丨匚卄匚几 I think it was 2016, but close enough.
Here in Australia, we're going through a similar situation to the king with the wealthiest person in the country, Gina Rinehart. She had a hideous portrait exhibited in one of our national galleries. Since she is a major sponsor of her state's swimming organisation, she's been getting all of these elite swimmers to sign a petition to remove the portrait. All of these random athletes have been making public statements about how the painting is "deeply offensive" and all that. The funny thing is that the painting was basically unheard of until she started the petition, so there's a Streisand effect where there's only more and more coverage happening of the piece. Just goes to show how even multibillionaires are still as conceited and self-absorbed as we are.
Bruhhh I swear Australian politicians are the craziest bastards remember that time Tony ate a fucking raw onion and scomo shat himself in a maccas and John barilaro punched a cameraman and the guy who drowned and got a pool in his honour no wonder most Australians don't care about politics
That's funny, but it's not a similar situation. This one is an intentional and official portrait which they endorsed and are somewhat proud of despite public mockery; what you described is the public endorsing a painting that was interpreted to be mocking the subject, and precisely for that reason rather than in spite of that.
3:10 lol the excuse for visual dismemberment is 'to humanize'. Double-speak.
Each portrait seems as an insult to the monarch. Disempowerment, by showing the monarch cannot complain, they have to smile and wave like the puppet they are.
the puppet of the global parliament. Peak democratic tyranny
that painting looks straight out of elden ring
got the Aeonian butterflies, too.
If you go to the spot of the painting queen lizzy respawns
Elden Ring (N64, 2000)
6:30 It was the capitol building not the white house, no?
Silly Canuck got the two mixed up.
Simple mistake probably
He's Canadian but yeah it was
My royal painting would have seen me rising out of the channel like a kaiju, blocking the shores of my “green and pleasant land” from a dozen dinghies.
your videos make me think and ponder on whats going on in the world while im stuck in my own. brain exercise is nice :)
This story slightly parallels the Gina Rinehart "portrait" in the National Gallery of Australia. The artist Vincent Namatjira portayed her as he saw her, and many others do too, and she's not happy about it.
She has said some horrible things, especially concerning the indigenous people of Australia and the artist is indigenous and he portrayed her accordingly. She wants it removed and the gallery won't do it despite her having donated a lot to the gallery in the past. C'est la vie.
Why does he look like Palpatine in the portrait, tho?
@nobody4148 he's a bad guy that has dined on human flesh. thrilled by sadist acts and enjoys the dungeon. do you admire his confidence?
Its crazy to think that all the old artists drew such detailed photo realistic paintings....and now we have all this crazy shit
He doesn't miss.
got here exactly one minute after the video was posted, decided to watch it before commenting, and here i am now, speechless. again.
as a gen xer, i don't simply accept all and any authority as "natural". the xtreme radicalness of 90s saw very well to that, thank you. but, at the same time, i can't deny it's inextricably interwoven in human nature. maybe in all of nature? there's always someone leading any sort of group, however indirectly or informally, and even "irrational" animals understand that following the stronger/wiser is sometimes required for survival against common threats.
so i think the world is ungovernable not because authority is useless per se, but because every. single. "king" and "queen" out there is aggressively naked and we can't (as in, lack the ability to) go on pretending otherwise. the rich and powerful have always used the rest of us to survive, but now they simply refuse to give back anything in return. it's unsustainable... right?
it's 1789 all over again, methinks. the difference is i'm not sure what can replace the old "liberté, fraternité, egalité" motto when such ideas have been thoroughly emptied by the very people that ascended to power after that revolution of the "masses".
life is certainly curious in this post-history period.
oh, and thanks for reminding me (again) not to tap out.
Tldr. don’t use the word ‘methinks’ I will give you an atomic weggie and steal your lunch money
And now everyone is finally waking up and not idolizing the rich, with the current cancellng and boycotting and mass blocking of influencers and stars. It is a reversal of "power" or power dynamic. It is about respect and control and finally taking the reigns and realizing that we have the control and that respect should be earned not just granted.
The belief that any time period is "post-history" is just 20th century chauvinism at its best. History never ends, and we never stop living in it. It is the story of mankind, and so long as man is in dominion over the earth, he will continue to make history. This civilization will eventually wither away and die, like all the others before it. We are not more virtuous than our ancestors simply because of our existence in the present. The ideals we hold dear, like republicanism or entrepreneurial fortune-seeking, are actually very old.
in other words, the leaders are not leading anymore... they want all the personal benefits of power with none of the responsibilities and directives. they have no vision but the continuation of their own rule, no grand empires to build, or some mortal enemy to defeat.... they have become complicit and soft.... abolish it, and build a new system out of the rubble.
the motto of the post-liberal age would be one of Honour, Solidarity, and Strength. the lies of the liberal system has been exposed to all...
Thank you for telling that J6 story to filter gen x
Nah the king just watched that one episode of regular show were mordecai paints bensons portrait and said “yeah I want that”
This reminds me back in 5th grade when our teacher said she shook the president's hand, and then the whole class wanted to shake her hand after that and how cool we all thought that was, but now if someone told me they were even within 10 feet of a politician i'd look at them like they just man-handled a dog turd.
Or a nonce
I dunno. Hard to make this argument about a monarch with no power.
I think your take is dumb but I'm no longer willing to make the effort to argue with people online
@@Michael-xr5yx this is so me
@Michael-xr5yx I mean, King Charles objectively doesn't have any de facto power. He is purely a figurehead. The people actually in charge of the UK are people like the Rothschilds and other banking dynasties.
Monarchs in UK still have a lot of power. Part of it is soft power - most of the people living in the country (especially older people) support monarchy. By extension they support the king so he can influence a lot of people
He's a head of the Anglican Church. Quite an important position
He's rich af
He technically can take control over UK. He doesn't really have to listen to the goverment. He and his mother just decided they'll allow the democratic system to rule in their name. From time to time the Royal Family uses it's power to do questionable stuff. There's this law in UK which forbids workplace discrimination. Guess who is exemt from it? If the king doesn't want to have black servants then he can just openly say he only accept white people for the job
@@angelikaskoroszyn8495all about blacks always. Lol it got boring
freaking fantastic video btw
far from greatness. he doesnt know the royal family
you keep delivering banger after banger. Dont stop Art Chad, dont let yourself be suicided. Never surrender
This is cool. Honestly the more subtle the artistic meaning, the more impactful it is.
Great message at the end
The painting is hard af IDC
The red is royal blood matrix that holds Charles the image, and his hands. The face and hands connote the idea Charles will be remembered by places and things changed by his appearance and work he did with his hands.
Its funny how, he's hes often strawmaning "the left"s position on an issue and almost always proceeds to make arguments a lot of leftists would make
That portrait doesn't reflect humanity, this is like the most morbid portrait of some kind of evil vampire lord
You absolutely nailed the observation that so many older people take symbols of authority and legitimacy at face value.
I fucking love this portrait honestly it’s so pretty
Jan 6th wasn't at The White House, it was at The Capitol.
Come on Art Chad! I'm not even a yankee and I know that lol.
& no mention of the cute lil butterfly in the painting?
4:38 man, Jack Layton had respect and likeabilty up to and including his final address before cancer took him election year. We’re in the worst timeline, but that man that once was the favourite and looked to be actually a broad advocate for workers’ rights, lives on in my heart as an example worth hoping for once more.
Can I subscribe twice? Love the content, keep it up! ❤
Either this is a different source or someone's analysis, but taking into account the "March of the Gladiator's" origin, the track was once made in image of the arrival of a mighty warrior.
To the common folk, it sounds like proud mockery, thus its composition is used in circus... to poke fun and to represent that the ones in power serve for entertainment. A mocking way, but it depends who this person in power is.
The painting looks like King Charles was in the blood of the actual good people. And then... RIP Queen Elizabeth, the fading style represents her death.
Was not expecting you to touch on the illusion of authority the way you did, right on man.
Highly recommend you check out the book “The Most Dangerous Superstition” by Larken Rose if you haven’t.
Much love man and keep it up.
5:04 he looks like he's a JoJo character with that pose
Wow, you and I have very similar ideas regarding these new styles of royal portraits
I tried to tap out 🤣 my body didn't let me. Glad I'm here, clown world is hilarious 😂
Those red are pre integrated tomato sauce so you don’t need to bring your own
Art chad remains underrated
This is the first video of yours that I watched. I am delightfully impressed, as well as morbidly depressed. That little reminder at the end that if I were to kill myself I would miss out surprisingly exactly what I needed to hear.
7:54 the words i needed to hear.
0:45 the fact that this is uci, is the second coincidental connection with my life by pure chance, and thats kinda crazy
students were suspended as well. terribly handled situation
the new elden ring dlc boss portrait looks hype🔥
Good video. But I think you might be mischaracterizing your father's feelings about J6. It's not that the *people* are important, it's the institution that deserves respect. Putting your feet up on Pelosi's desk isn't offensive to her, it's offensive to the desk, and what it represents in the history of the American democratic experiment. That's what most old fools like me saw as disrespect. I don't think there's more than 3 or 4 people in the whole US congress who actually deserves respect, but the building, the institution, the ideas it represents and the job it has to do; these are worth respecting, no matter what group of monkeys happen to occupy those seats at any time.
Exactly this, it was a disgusting display of disrespect to their own country. (I'm not american) And more so that they didn't realize they were zombies directed by a corrupt millionaire, and he stood by and laughed as those pawns did his bidding.
This makes sense. I’m inclined to agree with you. Thanks for sharing
Wish I could've disrespected it myself but those people on J6 were idiots. Can't deny that
I think the main problem is that they want to uproot democracy and put up an even more authoritarian regime... the framing of this video is completely wrong, the core of jan 6 wasn't "challenging authority" conservatives have literally been empirically shown to be more authoritarian, qnd I'm guessing there's a big overlap between that demographic and the jan 6 one.
Just like how a somoliet brought 3 dollar wine to a competition and made the 1st place,
It really doesn't matter what a professional says. 😂
The masses are the
general/collective interpreters.
What they say matters most, doesn't it? After all you, reading; are one of them.
“It’s like Columbine, but with nukes.” -Art Chad
I never imagined I would see an actual youtuber I watch from Nova Scotia. also whats the end credits music?
Don't kill yourself, we are all gonna die together
Bachelor in fine arts? Poor child :(
JK Great content man.
I really appreciate how he ends all his videos.
power 2 the people! blockclerk supremacy!
but yeah
If anyone can tell me the outro song I will be indebted to you
insanely good video i cant come up with a response..
but i do think its a good thing society is changing like that.. this is a total blindspot for me, paintings commisioned by the powerful..
the artist is the only thing linking the isolated wealth-society to the 'masses. finding a message that way sounds so fun.
i think yt is shadow banning you cause they never show your vids on my homepage i have to go outta my way to search you up everytime
Brilliant.
Love you Art Chad.
🤪
Finna get some aura with aura
An 8 minutebcideo that doesnt actual start until 2:45. Wild
what annoys me about it isn't even how obviously demonic it is, the honesty is almost refreshing - it's the lack of solidity to the painting, the red swirls seeming to merge with his clothing and to be ethereal, or like a gas. Only his face is solid. The ability to make any genuine representation or grounded communication to the viewer seems missing. And yet, it's simultaneously complicated and overdone. Like a meal that looks like a thrown together casserole yet tastes of a dozen excessively added spices. A lack of confidence, lack of meaning, and compensation therefor. A better painter would have said more with less.
Whats the name of the song at the end?
such a great video
Is it just me?
Shroud of Charlin
I want to push back on the idea that no leader is respected. I live in china, people actually respect and like Xi Jin Ping. Support for the party is authentic and strong. .
In so-called "democracies," leaders are not respected. Only in states which overtly represent the national interests are leaders respected.
I actually love that
Great video! You should read a book called the Sober Altruist!
The King Charles portrait was Muddled.
wow. this was a great video. thanks
Oops, I thought you were not a monarchy like me, a Belgian.
Well done, good sir.
I didn’t know his happens in 2014
2014 🤔 2024 🤪 these are actually postcodes as the fed is laundered through Australia
1066 is a postcode not a year that the family name goes back to. It’s where the postal Union is.
A4 isn’t paper but a land transit route
i think we all deserve a tasteful glaze... as a treat
He looks like Walmart Owen Wilson
“Wwwwoooowww…”
they got all that red from kate’s blood
It looks like his head and hands have been cut off, lying in a pool of blood. Who could possibly do that?
7:25 that's the fun part
WE DON'T
Search about the monarch butterfly and the project MK Ultra, then associate it with the pedophile accusation toward this subhuman.
What's the connection between the monarch butterfly and MK ultra?
outro song?
"Drives beat up Mercedes"
Shows Buffet's old, but mint condition, Cadillac.
Also January 6th was not at the White House, which in a way proves your point about how you feel about it.
I don't think the painting is as bad as people make it out to be, although going with a more mellow colour scheme could have gone over better.
nice vid
I just think tthat maybe you should moderate the volume since in this video you felt way louder hahahaha
Vigo the Carpathian
Nobody can paint an actual portrait anymore
Look up the portrait of Trump.
It has the esteem of a president
Bro thinks Putin is the next Hitler lmao
These authorities makes life harder and make negotiated wars, where poors dying and rich handshake later.
I'd pay a solid $300 (American) for this video
Funny enough this is all the tell tales of a dying decadent empire. We in the West have literally "had it too good for too long." Most of us can't even personally remember the last full scale drafting and all war that our nations had. Vietnam seems like from another age, the modern millennial and zoomer can't comprehend such a notion.
This also shows how the host populas of a society loses ground. Physically and socially. People can't agree with what is roght or wrong , there is no "common sense". No people, no god, not even language.
But when it all comes crumbling down and the barbarian hordes flood over the hills, the people will lnow terror and fear and pain and a collective unifying existential threat that is undeniable. THEN people will look for direction, a leader, power; and truly believe.
ITS SO FAST
Making a painting to critisize if monarchy is still relevant is ironic in era of smartphones that can take instant picture.
Why does it look like he’s on fire?
I guess i have a boomer mentality lol
I thought Jan 6th was disgusting. Im millennial. People have the right to protest and question. And you should.
But the people who did this love America, but they trash the very symbol of our republic?
I dont like nancy, but i wouldnt disrespect the office she inhabited. The Speaker of the House has been here since the country was founded. It trascends us. Unfortunately the people who are elected rarely respects its weight.
We live in a republic founded by people who overthrew their old government in a violent revolution, all for imposing less than our current ones does. Respect is earned and lost,from their point of view, the republic and it's core values where killed and are being worn as a skin suit by people who openly despise, gaslight, befraud and belittle them. It is proof that enough against ghosts being able to alter the physical world that horrible accidents dont befall them often.
It's a huge country and frankly nobody is obligated to support a dystopian regime, this is what I don't like about this "oh only be rebellious every 50 years or so" as if you didn't have a whole country wide protest with burning buildings and riots beforehand.
@@IbnRushd-mv3fp The BLM riots also sucked. Two things can be true at once. America is not its government. America is an idea that transcends us. You can criticize our leaders, not the ideals of free and justice.
Yo do one on Gina from Australia!!!
Your dad seems nice
2014
Dope
Art Yapper