Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Who cares about the history of science?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 вер 2024
  • The 2015 Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Lecture was this year presented by Professor Hasok Chang, Hans Rausing professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Cambridge.
    He looks at how we can learn from the radically different ways in which scientists have made sense of the universe over the ages.
    Filmed: 6.30pm - 7.30pm on Tuesday 10 May 2016 at The Royal Society, London.
    royalsociety.o...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @williamtell5365
    @williamtell5365 2 роки тому +5

    I took several history of science courses as an undergraduate and graduate student. Fortunately for me, they were excellent. You simply cannot fully understand science and it's place in the world without understanding its history and the basic models that we now use to explain science.

  • @MrPotterrable
    @MrPotterrable 8 років тому +13

    thank you so much for putting these lectures online!

    • @royalsociety
      @royalsociety  8 років тому +11

      No problem, glad you like them Henry :)

    • @MrGOTAMA420
      @MrGOTAMA420 8 років тому

      WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

  • @rodwallace6237
    @rodwallace6237 5 років тому +5

    Starts at 2:35

  • @therusher8
    @therusher8 7 років тому +4

    The Newton-Apple story is first mentioned by William Stukeley, long after the event. It's likely a Biblical metaphor - forbidden fruit, knowledge of the mind of God, etc.

  • @angelotenfennicoladeli2987
    @angelotenfennicoladeli2987 6 років тому +2

    Great Lecture!

  • @user-lp5qb3jc8q
    @user-lp5qb3jc8q 5 років тому

    Clear and well organized lecture

  • @SanadAlfadhel
    @SanadAlfadhel 2 роки тому

    thanks for this lecture

  • @googleskype3490
    @googleskype3490 6 років тому

    It might be insightful to investigate published results that contradict current models and attempt to diagnose the problems in those experiments, posthumously.

  • @TwistedLemniscate
    @TwistedLemniscate 8 років тому

    Why are the stories of Newton and the Apple and Franklin and the Kite considered myths? Via the UA-cam Channel Objectivity (episodes #1 and #21) I've seen convincing cases that both occurred in some form or another. Perhaps there exist detailed accounts for why both stories are myths that I've yet to see.

    • @maaaaaaaaarcel
      @maaaaaaaaarcel 8 років тому +11

      Fundamentally, the issue is that whether or not an apple fell on Newton's head (and it might just have, who knows?) truly does not matter. It does not even begin to be relevant for the actual historical questions. The idea of gravity itself is not something Newton specifically came up with; Edmund Halley, Christop Wren, Robert Hooke, and many others all thought about gravity at the time. Newton's great achievement was to come up with the ingenious mathematical formalism that allowed him to provide empirically adequate and determinate descriptions of natural phenomena; a smart 10 year old could come up with the notion of gravity. Coming up with the mathematical theory is the hard part.

  • @JCResDoc94
    @JCResDoc94 7 років тому

    46:00 phx climate models

  • @JCResDoc94
    @JCResDoc94 7 років тому

    49:00 hx of phil of sci

  • @googleskype3490
    @googleskype3490 6 років тому +2

    This guy is literally getting paid to LARP as a scientist. A 19th century scientist at that.