Here, we look not just at why Chinggis Khan turned away from the borders of India, but also the time that Jalal al-Din Mingburnu, the fleeing Khwarezmian, spent in India, settin up consequences for the Mongols much later on! I'm probably the first person to make a map of Hasan Qarluq and Ozbeg-bei's territory. It's not pretty, but it's not clear either how much they actually controlled. Ozbeg-bei ends up fleeing and rejoining Mingburnu once Iltutmish captured his territory, while Hasan Qarluq's territory was gradually eroded by the Mongols over the following decades (he was briefly a vassal of them too) before he fled them in 1239, capturing some territory in Sind before eventually (I believe) submitting to the Delhi Sultanate Patreon: www.patreon.com/jackmeister
The research you did for this video commendable... Thank you for providing detailed information about the history of India. Edited to add, followed your link from kings and generals.
I love it how you pronounce “chingis” not “genghis”, “haan” not “khan”. “Chingis haan” is the correct way. Can not thank you enough there is an youtube channel and its entire contents solely dedicated to Mongol empire. Keep up the good work.
Very good bro .I am indian hindu . I research chingis haan name . I confused chingis haan were muslim or baudh? In our place, some Arabic ponies call them Muslim Genghis Khan and continue to forcibly give them the title of Muslim. I want to know what was the relationship between the trident and our lord Shiva outside his memorial.
@@shernikasher93 Why do Indian guys have to come inside random videos and make it about them or Hinduism??? Chinggis Khan and his Mongols were Tengrists. Shamans and Eternal Blue Sky worshippers. They had nothing to do with Hindu or Buddha. I guess you saw that Hindu nationalism propagandist Chavda video. The trident is not a coopyright of India or Shiva, trident has been there in other cultures and formed independently. You think others were stupid to not create a trident ?
Brother, I do not need any Mongol king to spread Hindu religion. My Indian civilization is from time immemorial. Blue sky, earth, fire, water, air is considered to be the form of God. Trishul is kept as a weapon of God. This does not mean that the Mongols imitated him. In every province of the earth, one God is believed in some form or the other. I have put my views here to clear my doubts. I consider Genghis Han to be a role model because he tried to eliminate Islamic terrorism. Before that, we had killed the founder of Islam, Hazrat Muhammad by entering his house, in our Hindu texts, he has been described as a demon and an improper devotee of Mahadev. Keep in mind, if you think that for the promotion of Hindu religion, I resort to the name of the Mongol king, then it is your mistake and stupidity. A bigger king than them continues to create our land to the emperor, in the ages, not only a part of the earth, but the whole earth is donated by winning many times and we have faced and put an end to the bigger demons than Muhammad. Our Hindu religion rests on eternal knowledge and science, not on any king or emperor, God himself comes to the land of India to protect Hindu religion. Are you understand 🙄 I think you are a worshiper of Muhammad, not a Mongol because in this way a Mongol does not talk to an Indian in this way, but an Islamic rat talks like this.and you are student of editer google . By the way, I have read the biography of Genghis Han imported from Mongol. I knew what I wanted to know, I did not invite you to answer and I do not need your answer.
I live in West Bengal, India which was a part of Maurya Empire, Gupta Empire, Delhi Sultanate, Bengal Sultanate, Mughal Empire and off course British Empire. I've only mentioned the big empires, there was so many local empires in different time periods such as Pala Kingdom, Sena Kingdom, Koch kingdom etc.
@@vicmultani7582 Bruh. You realize Mongols were and are Buddhists for around 2000 years now? Yes now there are different religions there too. But their main state religion was always buddhism. And second of all your theory of them not able to fight because of hot climate does not stand true on any basis. The Turks too invaded India in the hot climates and were successful. They came from cold climates too. The mongols on the other hand had a larger and far superior army who endured a lot. They could have easily ransacked india but they chose not to clearly because of either cultural affinity or the betrayal they were dealing in China due to which mongols had to retaliate. None of these theories have concrete evidence but they stand more plausible than your climate theory.
@@vicmultani7582 I actually disagree with you the mamluks and turkik invader can conquer India and they also came from cold climate then so did genghis I want you to check out abhijit chavda on youtube his video on why genghis khan didn't conquer India its one of the most well elaborateted and accurate representation of gk
@@padmeamidala741 Mongols were not buddhists..if they were then why... did they killed Buddhists in China?...They worshipped to Tengri or Eternal Blue Sky..
The Mongols had pretext. The pretext was that by Genghis's ideology, Heaven had granted him the right to rule the entire world. The title "Genghis Khan" literally means "Ruler of the Universe". Khan meaning ruler and Genghis being derived from the Turkic word Tengriz, which literally translated to Ocean. But in the context that it was used, it had connotations and alternative meanings of vastness, and universe. Taken together, it basically meant Universal Ruler, or better put "Ruler of the Universe". Sooner or later, Genghis would absolutely have attempted an invasion of India. But as you said, at the time, the Khwarezmians were still not defeated. Thus the Mongols had to turn and deal with the Khwarezmians before they could turn their attention to India. The Mamluke Sultanate of India was a formidable power, with wealthy lands and a powerful military. Invading them would require the Mongols to bring their full strength to bear. As it was, their armies were already spread across two major theaters. One was invading Khwarezm, the other was subjugating the Xi Xia and Northern Jin in China. And while Genghis never attempted to invade India in any real capacity, his successors absolutely did. The Chaghatai Khanate launched several major invasions of India in 1299, and both Timur and Babur considered their invasions of India to be a fulfillment of Genghis's unfinished business with India.
@@yasararafatha3139 Yes !....the defenders of our Land. they were much better than Mongols even though not of good character by our high morality standards.
@@cryogenic5456 wow how stupid genghis khan could easily conquer indian if he had time he was after conquering central asian an old man china has always been the target of genghis khan and not india the mongols have always fought outnumbered please look at mongolian its a fallow land do u really think they were more mongolian than today
Genghis khan and his Mongol army reached near indian borders via Afghanistan between 1221 to 1222 while they chasing jalaluddin mangbornu after destroying Khwarizmi empire and defeating him in the battle of this indus river after the battle Genghis and his army decided to cross indus river and eliminate to Jalaluddin before return to Mongolia via Northern india and Assam by raiding Turkish delhi sultanate and his neighborhoods Rajput states like Gwalior, Chahamans of Ajmer and Parmars of Malwa on the returning way Genghis khan also send warning message to Delhi's sultan iltutmish of don't asylum to jalaluddin who requesting him for asylum and help against Mongols iltumish refused him any help to avoiding any direct war with powerful Genghis khan. On that time Indian climate is also hot hummid for mongols to invade india that's why Genghis khan cancelled the plan to invade North India, Assam and he returned to Mongolia via central asia from the banks of indus river his silent return by another way saved North india and Assam from a horrible destruction...
I am glad it is appreciated: it is a lot of time to research each of these, but I learn a lot in each one, and my favourite are when I can challenge the popular myths which crop up online
Thank you! My sources I used will always be listed in the description, with links when possible, and if you need specific page numbers or sources for specific statements I am happy to provide. Sometimes, if I feel a claim has a certain controversy or interest I note the source within the video itself (i.e, like saying it came from Juvaini or a modern historian like Peter Jackson), but generally citing within a video is rather awkward, and I haven't found a way to do it that I am happy with. But I keep extensive notes during my research, so I am prepared if someone asks about a specific point, and I am more than happy to assist in others interested in reading more about the presented topic.
Because India is still a Hindu country whereas all neighbouring countries converted to Islam within 100 years like Iran, Iraq, babilon, pakistan, Indonesia, Philippine etc.. use a little brains my friend. 😗
@@sarahfatima5049 yeah .. Philippine was also a Hindu / Buddhist country. Most European countries converted to Christianity within 100 to 500 years. And, thanks for the correction.
Gotta love these videos that delve into little to unknown details of history. I remember reading that Genghis Khan saw a bad omen at gates of India always wondered what the omen was. Do you know what exactly the Rhino told him?
It depends on the version, but it's normally something like "your master/the Khan should return home as soon as possible!" I think in some of the versions the sight of it alone is enough to worry the Mongols (and if you've never seen a Rhino or had no idea they existed, that's probably a reasonable reaction). There's a good article on the various versions of the story from the late, great Igor de Rachewiltz you can read here: www.eastasianhistory.org/42/rachewiltz-peace-loving-rhinoceros
Just finished reading the article. Fascinating stuff. Do you plan to cover Timur's campaigns in the future? He seems to get very little recognition relative to what he achieved. I especially want to know how he defeated Mamluks at Syria and also defeated Indians. Psychologically these two campaigns would have weighed hugely on Timur since he would have known how former Mongol invasions on Mamluks and Indians failed repeatedly, yet he managed to pull it off.
@@backpressure123 against Delhi sultanate of India Timur charged camels laden burning sticks against the war elephants which in return ran against their own army columns and disturbed the Sultan's army. Another thing is timur's soldiers were more battle hardened.
@@ALC0A021 lol the mongols literally tortured the Russians for fun and also exterminated the Arabs and then went up the great wall of China and destroyed the Yaun dynasty to shreds
The Mongols conquered Burma in the same climate. They tried to attack Vietnam not only once, but three times. The Vietnamese fought back, the Mongols had to retreat. As a result, Vietnam was not ruled by the Mongols.
@@ariyasilvayula5265eah a guy who subjugate and raped so many woman that most of current people in Asia shares his DNA is somehow a true Sanghi devotee. Seems a "Moslems" Khilji and a "Sanghi" Genghis had so many similiarties afterall.
yes it was, mongolian bows lose there accuracy in dry and hot weather, and since the mongol armies were mostly horse archers, than invasion would be ineffective
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory aha, well first, thanks for responding. Now I'm a bit more familiar with the royalty-free composers. After familiarizing myself with the Sao Meo track, I realized that you flowed two tracks together! My interest is in the second track, then. The vaguely Arabian sounding one. If this is a bother, thanks for at least getting me started.
@@MrCantStopTheRobot It is my pleasure to help (though I can't always reply immediately) By ear, I believe that is Desert Caravan or possibly Desert City, both of which you can get through UA-cam's audiolibrary. If that doesn't lead to the right one, I can open up the file and see the track name, but I'm fairly confident that's the right one
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory aha, it was Desert Caravan! There are a few of these royalty-free tracks that are good on their own merits... So as further thanks. If I've avoided a responsibility, I basically don't feel worthy of watching your video series. Conversely, if I just finished some exercise, or a piece of a project, or if I'm gearing up to do so, then I relish watching one of these videos. These tales and your research are in line with my spirit, and for my soul.
When you highlighted 2-3 cities of indian subcontinent, why did you mention MULTAN too, does it hold any significance in particular, im asking cause my family belongs to there but after muslims partitioned India in 1947, non muslims had to fled their homes so there is not much i can do to know about multan in particular, can you please make a video regarding that?? Please??
Hello! So in this period, Multan was one of the region's most important cities, a major trade and population centre, and several times over the thirteenth century, the Mongols, Khwarezmians and Delhi Sultans directed attacks against it. It was a valuable position as a possible platform to attack India, or as a border defence for the Delhi Sultans. It spent quite a few years in this period as independent of the control of the Mongols and Delhi Sultans, and was attacked by both several times but often proved difficult to hold. I think the citizens actually repulsed a number of the sieges themselves without outside assistance! Unfortunately, I only know a little bit about Multan as it relates to the Mongols- you would be better asking my friend Hikma History for a video on it, as he is more knowledgeable on Islamic history as a whole than me, and he has a few videos on the history of Muslim cities.
Multan was a great center of Hindu Sun worship and one of great Sun Temple was located there. By the way where did your forefathers settle after coming?
After 1947 partition millions of Muslims also got killed many were burned alive thousands of mosques were demolished thousands of Muslims lost their houses, not only Hindus but Muslims were also killed...
@@sarahfatima5049All Indians make same mistake regarding Pakistani Hindus. First mistake you make is to compare population of whole Pakistan in 1947 vs present day Pakistan...When In fact you should add Present day population of Bangladesh to whole equation...and hence your propaganda becomes meaningless
@@spm8584 bruh British were not real thats why go look bible has lot of different types found and even quran thats why it couldn't be defeated..... Abrahamic religions were used as greatest mind control trick...quran&bible were stolen and edited by invaders several times...
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians: First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)." Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Both Alexander and Genghis Khan saw there was nothing worthwhile in conquering India. During that time, India did not exist; there were just many scattered kingdoms.
he hated islam so much his 3 sons became muslims and spread islam . you hindus will forever cry and cry. i see no solution to your trauma beta. Admit muslims are worthy and strong even when they hold no power in india and hindus cry mera abba muslims mera abba muslim.
Kuch bhi if he hated Islam than why he sent trade mission to Persia...if he hates Islam how all of Mongols in Persia nd central Asia became muslim..it appears u hate Islam
Jackmeister- could it be that as a strategist, Chingis realized the foreign ecosystem was not conducive to Mongol triumphs? Examples being the failure at ein jalut, the failure in Japan, the failure in indo china.... w/o the steppe, the Mongol war machine was not able to adapt. Much like the Macedonian phalanx- useless in anything but open plain warfare and easily handled by maniple formations. Just an amateur here.
Good question! Certainly he recognized the limits of Mongol military ability. In fact, we see adaptions immediately during the war in China to fill the roles necessary for siege warfare (e.g., Chinese infantry, crossbowmen, siege machines). In fact, in general the Mongols showed great willingness to supplement the Mongol army and fill the roles the Mongols themselves were unable or unwilling to do themselves. Personally, I do not believe that most of the failures at the edge of the empire were reflective of an inherent 'outer limit' reached for the geographic effectiveness of horse archers. At 'Ayn Jalut, for instance, the Mongol army was defeated by an army also composed heavily of horse archers; 'Ayn Jalut was only narrowly won, and the Mamluk victory likely owes much to 1) the defection of an 'Ayyubid ally on the Mongol flank 2) the Mamluks forcing the Mongols into close combat, where superior equipment and close quarters combat training of the Mamluks gave them an edge; and it was still a close run thing. Likewise in Japan, the Samurai at the time primarily fought as horse archers. Probably south-east Asia best marks the place where horse archers were inadequate; a fact recognized by the Mongols themselves as these armies consisted of many Chinese footmen. And still the Mongols enjoyed tactical victories there; just not ones that could be transformed into strategic victories. As I've researched the Mongol empire, military adaptability doesn't seem to be the issue; a lack of political (in terms of governmental and army command) will and the failure to allocate enough troops, supplies and gather required intelligence (hallmarks of earlier Mongol campaigns) seems the greater issue. So whereas attacks on the Song Dynasty were all carefully planned operations, Khubilai's campaigns against Japan and southeast Asia were, comparatively speaking, a bit closer to the Khaan pointing in a given direction, giving the command to attack, and expecting victory BECAUSE they were Mongols. The fact that these regions tended to be in terrain less favourable to Mongolian cavalry subsequently became a much greater disadvantage than it had been in previous years.
I definitely will: there is a lot to cover in regards to matters around Chinggis' death, though Jochi's death is equally mysterious, and a few very interesting leads have popped up around it I hope to follow and examine!
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory and one More thing can You talk about the conquest of middle East Korea and China in ogedies reging Since they mostly get ignored for the invasion of Europe
I definitely it: my hope in the long term is to cover all those areas which get ignored for more famous periods, as well as go into the political structure and actual efforts of running an empire which stretched across Eurasia. I noticed you had a comment earlier on needing help with a project, but I don't know if I responded to it correctly or not. If you still need some help, we can discuss it here or you can reach me at my e-mail: thejackmeister.mongolhistory@gmail.com
Chinggis Khan did not invade India because he really had other more important targets: Central Asian empires, the Chinese empire and trade routes to Europe! Much more important for him as the trade route - the famous Silk Road - meant commercial interest and trade with the rest of the world. Mongolia is a land-locked country. He wanted to control trade and commerce to the world outside. The move west provided that. China had many more riches close to hand, hence China became the target. India had no interest for him. Later, his descendents, did try to invade India up to 5 times but were defeated by Aluddiin Khalji. Remember that name and thank him for saving India from the Mongol yolk! *Mongol invasions of India* en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_India
Alexander's army did not wanted to continue further hence had to returned but the later rome ruler seleucus attacked india but was defeated by chandragupta maurya and his prime minister chanakya
Onlyi north west india South was independent under the glorious rule of emperor krishnadebaraya of the vijaynagar empire when Babur got north india .East was under Mighty Ahoms of Assam Babur was a turk He was not a mongol descendant from the male side His maternsl side was linked to the Mongols by marriage .
Mongols didn't attack India after defeating Muslims who rules India at a time.. Because of the religion. Mongols were never defeated by anyone.. And he was not Muslim, people with skipped history class confused with his name khan..
Delhi sultanate at that time fought with only 20k Mongol soldiers. Delhi sultanate lost when Babur brought 50k Soldiers with him. Numbers always matters
He did invade India. Where'd you get your history degree from, a box of Cracker Jacks? He invaded much as the Assyrians did. You either: 1) sided with him, and he treated you friendly; or 2) you resisted and he destroyed your Kingdom. Northern India is already ruled by Muslim traders and traded well with the Mongol Empier by the time Tsingut reaches India's borders--there is speculation why he did not invade..but there are many kingdom states throughout his empire he did not invade. He was more interested in trade vs. slaughtering people--and for decades, India's already been trading and has good reputation to Tsingut (no need to invade). By the time he reached India/Mesopotamia, this high culture of India borders open with trade persuaded him not to invade; however, due to the influence of Islam and leaders from what is now modern day Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan aligning with his later descendants, from 1299 on-- up to Timur a descendant of both Mongol and Turk, 200 years later, Mughals which traced their lineage and heritage/authority to rule back to Tsingut (Ghenghis Khan).. Gurkani did face opposition from India--the Mughals (Mongols) invaded India/ruled it from the 16th to 19th century.
What the hell are you talking about ? You start by saying he did invade, then explaining the exact opposite in a single comment. Besides, Genghis was long dead when Timur came into power, and even more when the Mughals took India.
@harshu karma haha agree bro. He only made North side Army of Mongols . Im damn sure if Allaudin Face Hulagu khan. Hulagu would beat him to the death because at That time Hulagu was consider as superior lord even he was not a khagan that was kublai khan
@@DivineDiction_ Thousands of indian soilders😂 You idiot they were Delhi Sultanate soilders Mughals didn't exist in those times . Allaudin khiji was a Turkic or Afghan sultan .
@@LordSauron06 nahh buddy.... It was chagatai khanate who raided india and defeated by khaljis.... The mongol leader were duwa and baraq...... Hulagu was different... He was from ilkhanate... Which raided Baghdad but ended up in defeat in ain jalut
How much could religion have played in this lack of action? Changez Khan's religion, Tengrism was fairly similar to Hinduism and Buddhism, all pagan cultures. Perhaps one reason could be he wanted to avoid conflict and bloodshed in India with people very similar to him? India qas the richest region inthe world back then. Conquering Ondia would have made him the rocheat guy in all of the world!
Fairly similar ? Well, in that case, any religions could be seen as "fairly similar". I don't see much relations between a polytheistic, vedic religion derived from Indo-Aryan faiths, and an animist, more or less monotheistic faith for steppic origins. Genghis Khan probably didn't care much about religion. Under his reign, some of his subjects were Christians, other Buddhists, other Muslims, or Tengrists, it didn't really mattered.
Here, we look not just at why Chinggis Khan turned away from the borders of India, but also the time that Jalal al-Din Mingburnu, the fleeing Khwarezmian, spent in India, settin up consequences for the Mongols much later on!
I'm probably the first person to make a map of Hasan Qarluq and Ozbeg-bei's territory. It's not pretty, but it's not clear either how much they actually controlled. Ozbeg-bei ends up fleeing and rejoining Mingburnu once Iltutmish captured his territory, while Hasan Qarluq's territory was gradually eroded by the Mongols over the following decades (he was briefly a vassal of them too) before he fled them in 1239, capturing some territory in Sind before eventually (I believe) submitting to the Delhi Sultanate
Patreon: www.patreon.com/jackmeister
The research you did for this video commendable... Thank you for providing detailed information about the history of India. Edited to add, followed your link from kings and generals.
ua-cam.com/video/2Ozk2usklmY/v-deo.html
See this video by National Library of Mongolia for example
btw genghis mean sea and khan(haan) means king
If Genghis can't do it then no one khan
Did we watch a different video?
@Pappu Rahul Khan it cell
Genghis is Not a muslim
@@rashidrashidkhan4527 was
Did everyone here miss the pun?
I love it how you pronounce “chingis” not “genghis”, “haan” not “khan”. “Chingis haan” is the correct way. Can not thank you enough there is an youtube channel and its entire contents solely dedicated to Mongol empire. Keep up the good work.
@Prashant Pratap Singh The Europeans call him as such .
It is Khan where Kh is a voiceless velar fricative /x/
Very good bro .I am indian hindu . I research chingis haan name . I confused chingis haan were muslim or baudh? In our place, some Arabic ponies call them Muslim Genghis Khan and continue to forcibly give them the title of Muslim.
I want to know what was the relationship between the trident and our lord Shiva outside his memorial.
@@shernikasher93 Why do Indian guys have to come inside random videos and make it about them or Hinduism??? Chinggis Khan and his Mongols were Tengrists. Shamans and Eternal Blue Sky worshippers. They had nothing to do with Hindu or Buddha. I guess you saw that Hindu nationalism propagandist Chavda video. The trident is not a coopyright of India or Shiva, trident has been there in other cultures and formed independently. You think others were stupid to not create a trident ?
Brother, I do not need any Mongol king to spread Hindu religion. My Indian civilization is from time immemorial. Blue sky, earth, fire, water, air is considered to be the form of God. Trishul is kept as a weapon of God. This does not mean that the Mongols imitated him. In every province of the earth, one God is believed in some form or the other. I have put my views here to clear my doubts. I consider Genghis Han to be a role model because he tried to eliminate Islamic terrorism. Before that, we had killed the founder of Islam, Hazrat Muhammad by entering his house, in our Hindu texts, he has been described as a demon and an improper devotee of Mahadev. Keep in mind, if you think that for the promotion of Hindu religion, I resort to the name of the Mongol king, then it is your mistake and stupidity. A bigger king than them continues to create our land to the emperor, in the ages, not only a part of the earth, but the whole earth is donated by winning many times and we have faced and put an end to the bigger demons than Muhammad. Our Hindu religion rests on eternal knowledge and science, not on any king or emperor, God himself comes to the land of India to protect Hindu religion. Are you understand 🙄
I think you are a worshiper of Muhammad, not a Mongol because in this way a Mongol does not talk to an Indian in this way, but an Islamic rat talks like this.and you are student of editer google .
By the way, I have read the biography of Genghis Han imported from Mongol. I knew what I wanted to know, I did not invite you to answer and I do not need your answer.
Great stuff, one of my favorite history topics, and hence more than happy to have such detailed videos about it. Love from Gujarat!
I am very pleased you enjoyed it, my friend. I hope my pronunciation of Gujarat was recognizable!
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory Yes, it indeed was correct! :)
@@мувн-ш4ы yes he is hindu and why
I live in West Bengal, India which was a part of Maurya Empire, Gupta Empire, Delhi Sultanate, Bengal Sultanate, Mughal Empire and off course British Empire. I've only mentioned the big empires, there was so many local empires in different time periods such as Pala Kingdom, Sena Kingdom, Koch kingdom etc.
You forgot Maratha Empire
Cholas were the strongest of them all
@@snehlahurikar674 Marathas could not conquer the bengal
@@asifimtiaz7926 sorry I forgot to look at the detail
@@sarahfatima5049 chola were I the South not in the eastern part of India
defeated arab caliphates, defeated Alexander and resisted Mongol empire at it's peak and all that during at our lowest.
INDIA IS THE LAND OF WARRIORS
Because he was against Mlechhas but not against Hindus....Belonged to Buddhism....
Yeah he was against only islam
he should have come and alauddin shopuld have offred all the hindus to him. le ja khan pagans ko. maja le. teri hai tara hai le.
@@azmolhossain9244 Alauddin was bastard 🐖🐖🐖
@@VIKASSHARMA970 alauddhin protected india form gengis khans son
@MG Abdul Quadir oi mullah fuck off
If the governor of Otrar had never killed mongol traders---the mongols had no reason to come down into hotter climates.
@ahmed ali Mongols were not budhists. The region was too hot for them---. They got beat up every time they tried.
@@vicmultani7582 then why mugals and turks were successful in india they also came from coldder region
@@vicmultani7582 Bruh. You realize Mongols were and are Buddhists for around 2000 years now? Yes now there are different religions there too. But their main state religion was always buddhism. And second of all your theory of them not able to fight because of hot climate does not stand true on any basis. The Turks too invaded India in the hot climates and were successful. They came from cold climates too. The mongols on the other hand had a larger and far superior army who endured a lot. They could have easily ransacked india but they chose not to clearly because of either cultural affinity or the betrayal they were dealing in China due to which mongols had to retaliate. None of these theories have concrete evidence but they stand more plausible than your climate theory.
@@vicmultani7582 I actually disagree with you the mamluks and turkik invader can conquer India and they also came from cold climate then so did genghis I want you to check out abhijit chavda on youtube his video on why genghis khan didn't conquer India its one of the most well elaborateted and accurate representation of gk
@@padmeamidala741 Mongols were not buddhists..if they were then why... did they killed Buddhists in China?...They worshipped to Tengri or Eternal Blue Sky..
Because the conquest of Khorezm and Persia was not completed, and there were no pretexts and revenge
The Mongols had pretext. The pretext was that by Genghis's ideology, Heaven had granted him the right to rule the entire world. The title "Genghis Khan" literally means "Ruler of the Universe". Khan meaning ruler and Genghis being derived from the Turkic word Tengriz, which literally translated to Ocean. But in the context that it was used, it had connotations and alternative meanings of vastness, and universe. Taken together, it basically meant Universal Ruler, or better put "Ruler of the Universe".
Sooner or later, Genghis would absolutely have attempted an invasion of India. But as you said, at the time, the Khwarezmians were still not defeated. Thus the Mongols had to turn and deal with the Khwarezmians before they could turn their attention to India. The Mamluke Sultanate of India was a formidable power, with wealthy lands and a powerful military. Invading them would require the Mongols to bring their full strength to bear. As it was, their armies were already spread across two major theaters. One was invading Khwarezm, the other was subjugating the Xi Xia and Northern Jin in China.
And while Genghis never attempted to invade India in any real capacity, his successors absolutely did. The Chaghatai Khanate launched several major invasions of India in 1299, and both Timur and Babur considered their invasions of India to be a fulfillment of Genghis's unfinished business with India.
@ahmed ali what women ???🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂
Because elephants and the infinite number of india soldiers
India defeated mongols with much lesser army
@@cryogenic5456 Alaudeen khilji n zafar khan
@@yasararafatha3139
Yes !....the defenders of our Land. they were much better than Mongols even though not of good character by our high morality standards.
@@cryogenic5456 yeah Alaudin Khilji did protect us from the mongols, but he was also a pyscho
@@cryogenic5456 wow how stupid genghis khan could easily conquer indian if he had time he was after conquering central asian an old man china has always been the target of genghis khan and not india the mongols have always fought outnumbered please look at mongolian its a fallow land do u really think they were more mongolian than today
Been waiting for a video on this topic for a long time!
I hope it was worth the wait, my friend!
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory it was! Great content.
Genghis khan and his Mongol army reached near indian borders via Afghanistan between 1221 to 1222 while they chasing jalaluddin mangbornu after destroying Khwarizmi empire and defeating him in the battle of this indus river after the battle Genghis and his army decided to cross indus river and eliminate to Jalaluddin before return to Mongolia via Northern india and Assam by raiding Turkish delhi sultanate and his neighborhoods Rajput states like Gwalior, Chahamans of Ajmer and Parmars of Malwa on the returning way Genghis khan also send warning message to Delhi's sultan iltutmish of don't asylum to jalaluddin who requesting him for asylum and help against Mongols iltumish refused him any help to avoiding any direct war with powerful Genghis khan. On that time Indian climate is also hot hummid for mongols to invade india that's why Genghis khan cancelled the plan to invade North India, Assam and he returned to Mongolia via central asia from the banks of indus river his silent return by another way saved North india and Assam from a horrible destruction...
Really i don't think it because Arabia also is a hot continent truth is that he can't defeat India
Kya bak rha uska gand ft gya
@Almas Ismael tere se jada
@Almas Ismael ussko ana hi nhi tha udhr kbhi usko beta changate aya 4baar
@@drdre5030 kise dara tha bhai?
Official transcription should be uploaded: now you can learn with the proper subtitles!
Great stuff! I love this channel, it’s clear a lot of effort and serious research is put into every video you put out.
I am glad it is appreciated: it is a lot of time to research each of these, but I learn a lot in each one, and my favourite are when I can challenge the popular myths which crop up online
This is absolutely terrific, edit: nevermind you did :)
Thank you! My sources I used will always be listed in the description, with links when possible, and if you need specific page numbers or sources for specific statements I am happy to provide.
Sometimes, if I feel a claim has a certain controversy or interest I note the source within the video itself (i.e, like saying it came from Juvaini or a modern historian like Peter Jackson), but generally citing within a video is rather awkward, and I haven't found a way to do it that I am happy with. But I keep extensive notes during my research, so I am prepared if someone asks about a specific point, and I am more than happy to assist in others interested in reading more about the presented topic.
Quality content as usual. Keep it up mate 👊💪
Thank you! I will try!
Thank you for sharing, clear and passionate!
Because The Kathakali dances and elephants were scary lol
Because India is still a Hindu country whereas all neighbouring countries converted to Islam within 100 years like Iran, Iraq, babilon, pakistan, Indonesia, Philippine etc.. use a little brains my friend. 😗
@@crazycosco5657 phillippines is a Christian country
@@sarahfatima5049 yeah .. Philippine was also a Hindu / Buddhist country. Most European countries converted to Christianity within 100 to 500 years. And, thanks for the correction.
Gotta love these videos that delve into little to unknown details of history. I remember reading that Genghis Khan saw a bad omen at gates of India always wondered what the omen was. Do you know what exactly the Rhino told him?
It depends on the version, but it's normally something like "your master/the Khan should return home as soon as possible!" I think in some of the versions the sight of it alone is enough to worry the Mongols (and if you've never seen a Rhino or had no idea they existed, that's probably a reasonable reaction).
There's a good article on the various versions of the story from the late, great Igor de Rachewiltz you can read here: www.eastasianhistory.org/42/rachewiltz-peace-loving-rhinoceros
Just finished reading the article. Fascinating stuff. Do you plan to cover Timur's campaigns in the future? He seems to get very little recognition relative to what he achieved. I especially want to know how he defeated Mamluks at Syria and also defeated Indians. Psychologically these two campaigns would have weighed hugely on Timur since he would have known how former Mongol invasions on Mamluks and Indians failed repeatedly, yet he managed to pull it off.
@@backpressure123 against Delhi sultanate of India Timur charged camels laden burning sticks against the war elephants which in return ran against their own army columns and disturbed the Sultan's army. Another thing is timur's soldiers were more battle hardened.
@@ALC0A021 lol the mongols literally tortured the Russians for fun and also exterminated the Arabs and then went up the great wall of China and destroyed the Yaun dynasty to shreds
The Mongolian and genghis khan they were scared of the bengal tigers man eaters
What? But, they can easily kill them by archers.
Don't make Moronic Comment
It's degrades the video and history
@@DrStrange234 don't be upset
nice joke 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Don't use your brain even if you don't have one..
The Mongols also conquered Vietnam but left because the hot and wet climate is unsuitable for Mongols.
The Mongols conquered Burma in the same climate. They tried to attack Vietnam not only once, but three times. The Vietnamese fought back, the Mongols had to retreat. As a result, Vietnam was not ruled by the Mongols.
@@HN-nu6ed even India was not ruled by Mongols, 5-6 times they tried to invade India but every time Khilji defeated them...
The activities of Genghis Khan clearly indicates that he was a True blood Sanghi
Ok clown
@@sarahfatima5049 Honoured to be anything other than a museIim
He is Sanghi😆😎
@@ariyasilvayula5265eah a guy who subjugate and raped so many woman that most of current people in Asia shares his DNA is somehow a true Sanghi devotee. Seems a "Moslems" Khilji and a "Sanghi" Genghis had so many similiarties afterall.
I always thought it was because of the climate great stuff though
yes it was, mongolian bows lose there accuracy in dry and hot weather, and since the mongol armies were mostly horse archers, than invasion would be ineffective
@Joosie Jones true, India had elephants, and multiple accounts through history showed that elephants terrified horses
Rock, paper, scissors, ELEPHANT.
Even mosquito's
@Abu Troll al cockroachistan ohk but taimoor is a muslim and that time there is no strong leader in India but in chengis Khan time there was
What was the first music track used in this video. It seems to be neither Big Mojo, nor Jalandhar.
The very first track with the drums as the video opens is Sao Meo or Sao meo orchestral mix.
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory aha, well first, thanks for responding. Now I'm a bit more familiar with the royalty-free composers. After familiarizing myself with the Sao Meo track, I realized that you flowed two tracks together! My interest is in the second track, then. The vaguely Arabian sounding one. If this is a bother, thanks for at least getting me started.
@@MrCantStopTheRobot It is my pleasure to help (though I can't always reply immediately)
By ear, I believe that is Desert Caravan or possibly Desert City, both of which you can get through UA-cam's audiolibrary. If that doesn't lead to the right one, I can open up the file and see the track name, but I'm fairly confident that's the right one
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory aha, it was Desert Caravan! There are a few of these royalty-free tracks that are good on their own merits...
So as further thanks. If I've avoided a responsibility, I basically don't feel worthy of watching your video series. Conversely, if I just finished some exercise, or a piece of a project, or if I'm gearing up to do so, then I relish watching one of these videos. These tales and your research are in line with my spirit, and for my soul.
When you highlighted 2-3 cities of indian subcontinent, why did you mention MULTAN too, does it hold any significance in particular, im asking cause my family belongs to there but after muslims partitioned India in 1947, non muslims had to fled their homes so there is not much i can do to know about multan in particular, can you please make a video regarding that?? Please??
Hello! So in this period, Multan was one of the region's most important cities, a major trade and population centre, and several times over the thirteenth century, the Mongols, Khwarezmians and Delhi Sultans directed attacks against it. It was a valuable position as a possible platform to attack India, or as a border defence for the Delhi Sultans. It spent quite a few years in this period as independent of the control of the Mongols and Delhi Sultans, and was attacked by both several times but often proved difficult to hold. I think the citizens actually repulsed a number of the sieges themselves without outside assistance!
Unfortunately, I only know a little bit about Multan as it relates to the Mongols- you would be better asking my friend Hikma History for a video on it, as he is more knowledgeable on Islamic history as a whole than me, and he has a few videos on the history of Muslim cities.
Multan was a great center of Hindu Sun worship and one of great Sun Temple was located there. By the way where did your forefathers settle after coming?
After 1947 partition millions of Muslims also got killed many were burned alive thousands of mosques were demolished thousands of Muslims lost their houses, not only Hindus but Muslims were also killed...
@@syedhussain5852 yeah that's why your country hindu population disappeared now while India even had Muslim prime minister
@@sarahfatima5049All Indians make same mistake regarding Pakistani Hindus. First mistake you make is to compare population of whole Pakistan in 1947 vs present day Pakistan...When In fact you should add Present day population of Bangladesh to whole equation...and hence your propaganda becomes meaningless
Wow! So complicated. When did those men sleep?
Historically, often in the saddle.
ghan or Alexander...u can't invade india....just ur dreams...💪
Tell that to the british
@@spm8584 😂😂😂
@@spm8584 and the mughals?
@Amin Ali well that makes sense,
@@spm8584 bruh British were not real thats why go look bible has lot of different types found and even quran thats why it couldn't be defeated..... Abrahamic religions were used as greatest mind control trick...quran&bible were stolen and edited by invaders several times...
De Rachewiltz's article on Chinggis and the peace-loving Rhinoceros: www.eastasianhistory.org/42/rachewiltz-peace-loving-rhinoceros
Your channel is the Odd Compass of the Steppes .
What if the Mongolian empire and the Soviet union united ?
They'd still have to buy their smartphones from somewhere!
Soviet Khan! I heard you.
Then they have to fight with both China and USA 😄
The Muslim sultanate defended and saved India from the mongol genocide.
I think that time .India is quite but millions of soldiers same as Mongolian ..
They already defeated the Muslims who were ruling India
His descendants eventually did. Babur.
And then after came tamerlane
Tamerlane was not a descendant of Genghis Khan. He fantasised that he was. Genghis Khan wasn't Muslim for starters....
@@underdawg2743 But that Timur was a Muslim and Killed more Muslims than Hindus ever could..A Savage Monster he Was..
do about south india too with oldest known kingdom there and tamil as the oldest language known
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians:
First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)."
Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu...
So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Stop this spamming...He was not White European.
Both Alexander and Genghis Khan saw there was nothing worthwhile in conquering India. During that time, India did not exist; there were just many scattered kingdoms.
Outstanding stuff and great music
History of Uyghurs. Originally Hungarian was Ungar-Onoghur-On Uyghur. James Chuchward 5 v 4.
He hated islam , Chinese not india and it's hindus
he hated islam so much his 3 sons became muslims and spread islam . you hindus will forever cry and cry. i see no solution to your trauma beta. Admit muslims are worthy and strong even when they hold no power in india and hindus cry mera abba muslims mera abba muslim.
@Bharatiyakhaha bhe, kuch to bol.
@Amin Ali babaur is not a buddist. I had never said he was.
Kuch bhi if he hated Islam than why he sent trade mission to Persia...if he hates Islam how all of Mongols in Persia nd central Asia became muslim..it appears u hate Islam
Can you qoute book names for reference relating to Indian adventures of Jalal udeen and changes Khan
simple: because he had other priorities
Jackmeister- could it be that as a strategist, Chingis realized the foreign ecosystem was not conducive to Mongol triumphs?
Examples being the failure at ein jalut, the failure in Japan, the failure in indo china.... w/o the steppe, the Mongol war machine was not able to adapt. Much like the Macedonian phalanx- useless in anything but open plain warfare and easily handled by maniple formations.
Just an amateur here.
Good question! Certainly he recognized the limits of Mongol military ability. In fact, we see adaptions immediately during the war in China to fill the roles necessary for siege warfare (e.g., Chinese infantry, crossbowmen, siege machines). In fact, in general the Mongols showed great willingness to supplement the Mongol army and fill the roles the Mongols themselves were unable or unwilling to do themselves.
Personally, I do not believe that most of the failures at the edge of the empire were reflective of an inherent 'outer limit' reached for the geographic effectiveness of horse archers. At 'Ayn Jalut, for instance, the Mongol army was defeated by an army also composed heavily of horse archers; 'Ayn Jalut was only narrowly won, and the Mamluk victory likely owes much to 1) the defection of an 'Ayyubid ally on the Mongol flank 2) the Mamluks forcing the Mongols into close combat, where superior equipment and close quarters combat training of the Mamluks gave them an edge; and it was still a close run thing. Likewise in Japan, the Samurai at the time primarily fought as horse archers.
Probably south-east Asia best marks the place where horse archers were inadequate; a fact recognized by the Mongols themselves as these armies consisted of many Chinese footmen. And still the Mongols enjoyed tactical victories there; just not ones that could be transformed into strategic victories.
As I've researched the Mongol empire, military adaptability doesn't seem to be the issue; a lack of political (in terms of governmental and army command) will and the failure to allocate enough troops, supplies and gather required intelligence (hallmarks of earlier Mongol campaigns) seems the greater issue. So whereas attacks on the Song Dynasty were all carefully planned operations, Khubilai's campaigns against Japan and southeast Asia were, comparatively speaking, a bit closer to the Khaan pointing in a given direction, giving the command to attack, and expecting victory BECAUSE they were Mongols. The fact that these regions tended to be in terrain less favourable to Mongolian cavalry subsequently became a much greater disadvantage than it had been in previous years.
It's "sult-nut". Sult ( pronounced like cult ) nut ( pronounced the same as nut ).
when you get to it can you cover juchi and genghis death and the theories of their respective deaths
I definitely will: there is a lot to cover in regards to matters around Chinggis' death, though Jochi's death is equally mysterious, and a few very interesting leads have popped up around it I hope to follow and examine!
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory oh You actually respond it
Nice
Well as decendant form the Khan I say thanks for bringing us the history of the Mongols
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory and one More thing can You talk about the conquest of middle East Korea and China in ogedies reging
Since they mostly get ignored for the invasion of Europe
I definitely it: my hope in the long term is to cover all those areas which get ignored for more famous periods, as well as go into the political structure and actual efforts of running an empire which stretched across Eurasia.
I noticed you had a comment earlier on needing help with a project, but I don't know if I responded to it correctly or not. If you still need some help, we can discuss it here or you can reach me at my e-mail: thejackmeister.mongolhistory@gmail.com
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory thanks i sent you the e mail
The descendents of the Mongols were the Mughals and they established a huge empire in India.
Chinggis Khan did not invade India because he really had other more important targets: Central Asian empires, the Chinese empire and trade routes to Europe! Much more important for him as the trade route - the famous Silk Road - meant commercial interest and trade with the rest of the world. Mongolia is a land-locked country. He wanted to control trade and commerce to the world outside. The move west provided that. China had many more riches close to hand, hence China became the target. India had no interest for him. Later, his descendents, did try to invade India up to 5 times but were defeated by Aluddiin Khalji. Remember that name and thank him for saving India from the Mongol yolk!
*Mongol invasions of India*
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_India
What’s the music at 9:00
same reason Alexander stuck on India?
Alexander's army did not wanted to continue further hence had to returned but the later rome ruler seleucus attacked india but was defeated by chandragupta maurya and his prime minister chanakya
I believe babur was related to chengis Khan and he did invade India.
No he is not bro he is turk not mongol are indians and Arabs same??
@@hirenahir76200 babur was related to chengiz Khan through chagtai lineage.
And later Genghis' descendant Babur swept into India and established the Mughal empire
Onlyi north west india South was independent under the glorious rule of emperor krishnadebaraya of the vijaynagar empire when Babur got north india .East was under Mighty Ahoms of Assam
Babur was a turk He was not a mongol descendant from the male side His maternsl side was linked to the Mongols by marriage .
Indians are not the pray of predator chengis khan
He was too tired at that time and india is too big to rule to him.
Mongols didn't attack India after defeating Muslims who rules India at a time..
Because of the religion.
Mongols were never defeated by anyone..
And he was not Muslim, people with skipped history class confused with his name khan..
boy oh boy. Ever heard of muslims of egypt.
Yes, Mongols was defeated by Vietnam. Not only once but three times.
ua-cam.com/video/ZQtfwjSMY3A/v-deo.html
@ahmed ali Mongols were not budhist but follow shamanism nd worship sky fire etc
@ahmed ali But they killed Buddhists of China..
The Mongols had their ass kicked over 7 times by Indian Sultans and could never conquer India
What happened after 1236
Then what about the battle of jalandhar?
This video was specifically about Chinggis Khan and his reason for not invading India, not about Mongol attacks as a whole.
Welcome to Mongolia Mr.Jackmeister
expert Peter Jakson ... wut?
Too fucking hot
No offence, but i couldn't understand a thing because of his accent
Indian Muslim is very powerful and allaudin khilji great warrior .
Sultan allaudin khilji is 50,000 Mongolian head is well.
He was not indian he was from the land of bengals
What type of Indian muslim?
Indian convert to muslim or muslim with Indian residence?
Mongolian warriors were never defeated by mughals..
@@superwisdom7342 he was of khalaj tribe born in Bengal.
@@Oliver.jmr97 Mughals are descendants of Mongols bro
Turkish sultanate of Delhi saved India
Delhi sultanate at that time fought with only 20k Mongol soldiers. Delhi sultanate lost when Babur brought 50k Soldiers with him. Numbers always matters
He did invade India. Where'd you get your history degree from, a box of Cracker Jacks? He invaded much as the Assyrians did. You either: 1) sided with him, and he treated you friendly; or 2) you resisted and he destroyed your Kingdom. Northern India is already ruled by Muslim traders and traded well with the Mongol Empier by the time Tsingut reaches India's borders--there is speculation why he did not invade..but there are many kingdom states throughout his empire he did not invade. He was more interested in trade vs. slaughtering people--and for decades, India's already been trading and has good reputation to Tsingut (no need to invade). By the time he reached India/Mesopotamia, this high culture of India borders open with trade persuaded him not to invade; however, due to the influence of Islam and leaders from what is now modern day Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan aligning with his later descendants, from 1299 on-- up to Timur a descendant of both Mongol and Turk, 200 years later, Mughals which traced their lineage and heritage/authority to rule back to Tsingut (Ghenghis Khan).. Gurkani did face opposition from India--the Mughals (Mongols) invaded India/ruled it from the 16th to 19th century.
What the hell are you talking about ? You start by saying he did invade, then explaining the exact opposite in a single comment. Besides, Genghis was long dead when Timur came into power, and even more when the Mughals took India.
cuz it's hot out there hahha
See Also: ua-cam.com/video/yN9XgwVHvK4/v-deo.html
Because of Turks😎
Khalji Turks 😎😎😎
*ये RSS का फ़रजी Channel है!*
fearing the loss of his army due to hygiene 😂
Ghenghis Khan is lodted of allauddin khilji ♥️
Because of Alauddin
@harshu karma haha agree bro. He only made North side Army of Mongols . Im damn sure if Allaudin Face Hulagu khan. Hulagu would beat him to the death because at That time Hulagu was consider as superior lord even he was not a khagan that was kublai khan
Because of thousands of indian soldiers who gave their soul for india not mughal.
@@DivineDiction_
Thousands of indian soilders😂
You idiot they were Delhi Sultanate soilders
Mughals didn't exist in those times .
Allaudin khiji was a Turkic or Afghan sultan .
@@LordSauron06 nahh buddy.... It was chagatai khanate who raided india and defeated by khaljis.... The mongol leader were duwa and baraq...... Hulagu was different... He was from ilkhanate... Which raided Baghdad but ended up in defeat in ain jalut
Movies kam dekha kar chutiye
maybe he was scared shitless of the filth and lack of hygiene there.
Funny how mynah birds are the most notable birds in India
@@Nova67827 i love mynah birds and tolerate the people of india and the farmers.,its the Ducky government I hate.
@@mynahbird20000 no you hate that a Hindu is ruling that country..
Because alaudin khilji
Tired toomuch
How much could religion have played in this lack of action? Changez Khan's religion, Tengrism was fairly similar to Hinduism and Buddhism, all pagan cultures. Perhaps one reason could be he wanted to avoid conflict and bloodshed in India with people very similar to him? India qas the richest region inthe world back then. Conquering Ondia would have made him the rocheat guy in all of the world!
Fairly similar ? Well, in that case, any religions could be seen as "fairly similar". I don't see much relations between a polytheistic, vedic religion derived from Indo-Aryan faiths, and an animist, more or less monotheistic faith for steppic origins.
Genghis Khan probably didn't care much about religion. Under his reign, some of his subjects were Christians, other Buddhists, other Muslims, or Tengrists, it didn't really mattered.
If Genghis truly care about Tengrism he would not attack khazarians and tengris, he was simply a qonqueror, thats all.
who is chinggis khan??LMAO :D I know only Genghis Khan