This is one best way to get the actual size of the particle. I have tried automated method (analyse particle) but that gave weird results especially if your image is underexposed/differently exposed in some area and it also not recognize all the particles in the image. Despite you give cutoff value, the automated method sometimes reconsiders dart/artefacts that give false-positive results.
You can automate getting the largest and smallest diameter by thresholding the image and using the Feret's Diameter measurement in Analyze function. I use it for measuring pore spaces.
Thank you for sharing :) Can I know the principal (sphere fitting ......or else ) that the software uses to calculate diameters especially if particles have an irregular shape note really spherical.
H, I think you are measuring both the length and width of grain at the same time. In the results, you are showing both as to length. This is not correct. This should be shown as both the length and width separately. You should separate data and calculate the values separately. You might be right that's how they measure length for grain analysis. Area measurement is fine. In the end, I have to say good effort. Is it possible to automate the measurement? If someone has lots of images to analyse how are they going to do it manually. How do you set the thresh hold? Thanks
I believe it is counting the pixels not the exact point-to-point distance. In that case it won't be wrong. Otherwise I am wrong. However, in both the cases, I am fortunate that you have observed and notified. Thank you very much. Sorry for very late reply.
Depends on the material really. Any magnification is good as long as its big enough that you can measure it accurately. Just dont forget to use the scale.
Its too random. What is the area and length of that particular grain? You have done the area and length separately. So in the origin table one row doesnt contain size of a single particle.
Sorry, I can't remember the name right now. I will let you know If I can recall later. Anyway, how about the music in other videos of InSciLab? 🤔 You don't like those?
😸😁😄🙃 Debashish, title of this music is Reese Peace Riddim by Konrad OldMoney. You can find it in Shazam website or here. ua-cam.com/video/ig-YuuW8WjQ/v-deo.html
This is one best way to get the actual size of the particle.
I have tried automated method (analyse particle) but that gave weird results especially if your image is underexposed/differently exposed in some area and it also not recognize all the particles in the image. Despite you give cutoff value, the automated method sometimes reconsiders dart/artefacts that give false-positive results.
You can automate getting the largest and smallest diameter by thresholding the image and using the Feret's Diameter measurement in Analyze function. I use it for measuring pore spaces.
Totally agree. That's the best way, I guess.
Can you help me to give me the procedure ??
Absolutely great tutorial. It covers almost everything in as simple language as it is possible. This is going to go in my favorites.
Super bad 😁
Why do people like bad things so much 😭 I realized why it's important.
Is there anyone else loving this bad way, like me?
is it necesary to measure both length and width of same particle ...
0:19 absolute legend line. never seen any youtube do that before.
Dear Punyam, this is best comment I got! Comments are energy for me.
Thank you for sharing :) Can I know the principal (sphere fitting ......or else ) that the software uses to calculate diameters especially if particles have an irregular shape note really spherical.
Very helpful but how to fit Gaussian distribution over this histogram
This is not bad ..rather good idea.Thank you.
You are welcome. Actually, I was waiting for someone to say this.
H,
I think you are measuring both the length and width of grain at the same time. In the results, you are showing both as to length. This is not correct. This should be shown as both the length and width separately. You should separate data and calculate the values separately. You might be right that's how they measure length for grain analysis. Area measurement is fine. In the end, I have to say good effort. Is it possible to automate the measurement? If someone has lots of images to analyse how are they going to do it manually. How do you set the thresh hold? Thanks
I believe it is counting the pixels not the exact point-to-point distance. In that case it won't be wrong. Otherwise I am wrong. However, in both the cases, I am fortunate that you have observed and notified. Thank you very much. Sorry for very late reply.
Please sir make a video on How to calculate PORE SIZE, PORE DIAMETER from SEM images using ImageJ software.. Please!
Great video! Is it possible to calculate oscillating frequency of water droplet using ImageJ?
Sorry Tharun, I have no idea on this.
I would like to see how those images are. or maybe some related papers.
Is it according to the ASTM standard ?
Sir, I have a question. What magnification is needed for finding grain size? Is 5000x enough?
Depends on the material really. Any magnification is good as long as its big enough that you can measure it accurately. Just dont forget to use the scale.
Its too random. What is the area and length of that particular grain? You have done the area and length separately. So in the origin table one row doesnt contain size of a single particle.
Depois da grande ajuda a melhor coisa desse vídeo é a música de fundo haha Obrigadaaaa!
Hi..Thanks for the Video, Threshold result is not giving accurately in my case. Can any one help me to fix this.?
It is always bit rough! try more to be expert no that. No further trick I know to easily fix it. Sorry
Thank you for your guiding video. It's very useful for me.
beautiful comments from you people, for which I am making such video. Thank you
Is there any possibility of getting X coordinates for all the bars in a histogram plot that's in image format (JPEG).
yes
@@InSciLab Can you please help me with that?
@@ZeeshanAkhtarKhanYAHYA do it with Matlab.
Perfect! Thank you, very helpful
how many particle did you measure?
As many as I can.
mean is particle size. Am I right?
great thank you so much sir🤗☺☺
Great 👍 Thank you 😊
this is awesome buddy ..
Good choice of song - what is it?
Sorry, I can't remember the name right now. I will let you know If I can recall later. Anyway, how about the music in other videos of InSciLab? 🤔 You don't like those?
Very nice ....video and narration
Liked the music. Where can i find it?
😸😁😄🙃
Debashish, title of this music is Reese Peace Riddim by Konrad OldMoney. You can find it in Shazam website or here. ua-cam.com/video/ig-YuuW8WjQ/v-deo.html
thank you it was very helpful
Thanks so much for sharing its so impresive
superb hats off to you dear
But how to plot count vs grain size graph?
The histogram he made.
Love the Music... rest i will see soon
Nice one. Loved it
Oh my god!
Like me You too like bad ideas.
Thank you.....
I realized this process is easy to understand and analyze work.
This is super amazing and helpful
The best way!! Thank you for instruction!
Thanks that's a good idea 🎉❤
imagej ka ye wala version download nh horaha m using windows 7 can anyone help me out ?
its urgent
Sorry for delay reply. I hope by now your problem is solved...
Great! Tanks a billion💐💯
Thanks for your tutorial!!
Informative tutorial
Thanks
thats such an amazing tutorial
Very helpful video, thank you.
is area represents size ?
I would always report size in both area and diameter/ length.
Thanks for the tutorial
very nice
exactly the Best way
Thanks bro it was verry helpful
Thanks for sharing! ^_^
fantastic
good one
thank you
you can not compare length and area. it is not correct! you have to find diameter from area and then use.
good
NICE BRO
TYSM!
genius
Good
I like it
Do it automatically with Matlab.
Hay algun programa para eso?
i did not like it, waste of time, thousand of particles are there how can handle it?
Maja AA gyaya bhai
Good