Finally Happened! NASA launching 1st Crew Starliner after 14 years BUT How Risky...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 тра 2024
- Finally Happened! NASA launching 1st Crew Starliner after 14 years BUT How Risky...
===
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
Boeing - UA-cam
Boeing Space (@BoeingSpace) / X (twitter.com)
SpaceX - UA-cam
===
Finally Happened! NASA launching 1st Crew Starliner after 14 years BUT How Risky...
After many, many years of delay, Starliner is finally about to send the first astronauts to the ISS. But hold on, folks, the journey is far from over! Even after securing its launch license, Starliner faces a slew of challenges and risks, from liftoff to the return journey back to Earth.
So, what are we looking at in terms of risks for Starliner's inaugural crewed mission? Can this spacecraft conquer these obstacles and emerge triumphant?
Get ready to dive deep into the heart of this epic adventure on today’s thrilling episode of Great SpaceX!
Finally Happened! NASA launching 1st Crew Starliner after 14 years BUT How Risky...
On the evening of May 6, Starliner will embark on its much-anticipated first crewed mission, known as CFT-1. This historic event comes a full decade after Boeing clinched the coveted Commercial Crew Program contract from NASA. Originally slated for liftoff in 2017, CFT-1 is finally taking flight, albeit more than 7 years behind schedule.
Finally Happened! NASA launching 1st Crew Starliner after 14 years BUT How Risky...
But hey, better late than never, right? With the clock ticking on the ISS's remaining operational years, it's imperative for Starliner to fulfill its mission, starting with CFT-1. Yet, as they say, the path to success is rarely smooth sailing. Starliner's upcoming journey is brimming with challenges. What hurdles lie ahead?
----
We use images and content in accordance with the UA-cam Fair Use copyright guidelines: ua-cam.com/users/intlen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you. - Наука та технологія
I would jump at the chance to ride a Falcon 9 to orbit.
This mess? Not so much.
No one has asked you.
It is hard to fully understand how brave those two NASA astronauts are, they have definitely got the 'Right Stuff', God speed from the UK.
Hopefully, they can complete their mission and return safely
Ya they have guts. Reminds me of the old soyus/Apollo days. Willing to fly in an untested system. Crazy Boeing got the green light to begin with...
There is no way I'd get on that death trap. It needs to be a successful cargo vehicle for a while before launching people.
It isn't built for cargo. Couldn't carry much. That's the whole point of it. Crew launch vehicle. SpaceX has seperate vehicles for cargo and crewed spaceflight. Starliner is crew only.
@markevan1 I understand that, but the capsule is not trustworthy and it needs flights to work out the bugs. Loading it up with cargo instead of people will give it the opportunity to work out those bugs before they put people in it.
I am hoping that Butch & Suni have a Successful And safe Flight Tonight
♥️♥️♥️
@@colonbina1 I do to my Friend. I hope and pray for there safety.
Best wishes for brave souls testing Boeing crewed capsule throughout the week
"Our thoughts and prayers....."
A phrase Boeing has a little much practice using lately. 😅
I am sure space x will be on standby to rescue these astronuts from the starliner
No rescue would be possible unless they made it to the station. The capsules can't dock to each other, and spacewalking suits can't be used from either capsule either. Brave experienced crew... but this is no shuttle.
There is no amount of money that would get me on that thing.
Godspeed, brave astronauts!
The only reason this is not scrap is NASA does not want to put all their eggs into one basket. Boeing has been a NASA contractor for years, but they are still a commercial company and SpaceX appears to be better managed.
Yep, it's the one basket thing. The whole Commercial Crew Program is based and funded on two suppliers. The expendable Starliner won't fly very often, but they're stuck with it, unless it just won't function.
Space is absolutely unforgiving and has no mercy. NASA continues to do the right thing to provide redundant solutions for this delicate, high risk task. Boeing was the Number ONE choice for sixty years. Thanks to Boeing, we as humankind are where we are. I sure salute SpaxeX for their achievements, standing on the shoulders of titans. However, those Titans are the achievements of Boeing for a whopping six / seven decades straight now, including the Shuttle & the ISS. My humble thanks to NASA for not forgetting this. Boeing will bounce back.
well, they can't fall too much further so.....
With boeings track record, that crew must be well acquainted with anxiety
Starliner will parachute to Earth and make a land-based landing in the southwestern United States.
♥️♥️♥️
hopefully all bolts are tight so no doors fall off
hope isn't calibrated for the torque required owing to the fact that it's imaginary
They are landing on land not In the water.
I was thinking the same thing that they land on the land not in water, but this is what we get for AI
Build by Boing... good luck Folks
The Boeing Starliner lands over land at White Sands Range… not the Pacific Ocean.
You might want to get the info correct if you are putting out informative videos.
Thanks for your great contribution 👍
I would sit this flight out. Too many ‘fixes’ of ‘fixes’. 😳 Will be waiting to see if it lifts off without major delays at the pad.
How much have they spent on their new space suit.? Does not look comfortable
Big waste of taxpayer money. They already have a proven privet launch system that works well and is cheaper. I would not want to fly on anything Boing made these days.
Astronauts have no option here
Who knows jumping in barrel at Niagara is safer.
@@colonbina1They do. Don't go.
The smart Taxpayers want two options.
Obviously, Boeing has not performed well in this process, but it is very deliberate that NASA from the start wanted to have two options, and that logic has not changed.
NASA has *already* paid for *six* crew deliveries to the ISS. With all of the members of Congress who have received bribes ... er ... campaign contributions from Boeing and its many subcontractors if NASA cancelled the contract it would expect to see billions of dollars of funding disappear from future years. And Boeing cannot cancel the contract from its side without having to pay NASA at least $2B to replace the six missions. Today's flight is entirely funded by BOEING because this is a fixed price contract. No tax dollars are involved. Yes NASA would be better off if Boeing cancelled the contract because that $2B would pay for *nine* Crew Dragon missions. However SpaceX has *already* budgeted for the anticipated loss of one crewed mission to Boeing and one cargo mission to DreamCatcher each year. Also remember that because Northrop-Grumman put a low priority on obtaining a western replacement for its Russian-built Antares booster, SpaceX is now responsible for delivering the N-G Cygnus cargo missions to the ISS as well as its own Cargo Dragons.
Great Episode, Kev. Any serious Starliner fan. Has to be a nervous as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. You couldn't get me on that hard luck beast. Thanks for the update. Keep doing what you're doing. Have a Great Day.
Thanks for your great comment. Have a nice day and wait for their upcoming flight
Hope the doors stay on.
I'm just hoping that it goes the right direction this time!
I guess they are launching at night so we can’t see all of the pieces falling off of it
Both Boeing and NASA know the magnitude of a successful flight, so I'm confident they won't take any unnecessary risks. As much as I'm disappointed with Boeing, I hope they prove Starliner to be a safe and robust spacecraft and that the astronauts get there and back OK.
Yeah, I hope they can successfully complete the upcoming flight
Inb4 the door flies off during launch.
Starliner is the proverbial dead horse that's being whipped by the government, due to not having anything better to do. It's basically to keep the needed people working at one location for the duration, until someone has a brain-fart worthy of trying out.
Still, the question hangs in the center of the room: If we could make all the "Moon Shots" back then, using the old Motorola 6809E 8 Bit microprocessor running at 8Mh, why is it now that with all the high power stuff available, the A.I.s and Quantum Computing included, why and how is it we're having so much trouble figuring it out "Again", nowadays?
No sht! Those guys had half the computer programming and used a lot of slide rules. 5 years and 6 missions to the moon.
The last Space Shuttle was in 2011 and we are just NOW getting ready to go to the ISS.
13 FREAKING YEARS!!
Nice job outlining the risks associated with a Starliner mission. Hypergolic fuel is scary stuff! But it is just as scary when used by the SpaceX Crew Dragon Draco thrusters as it is in the Starliner. But how did you overlook the recovery of Starliner from land touchdown? That's scary stuff that our astronauts have only had to experience when hitching a Soyuz ride.
With a chute failure, crashing into the ocean is just as deadly. It did land ok on it's last test flight, airbags worked, although chute problems have been discovered since.
Don't hold your breath
If I was one of the crew members,I would call in sick on launch day.
You wouldn't be trained as an Astronaut then
You'd be where you already spend your time-- in your parent's basement
DEI crew, no astronauts.
Pulled out the thesaurus again.
Today's thrilling episode? Oh brother...
Let’s wish all the best for them
There going to risk people's lives on a test flight? I think I'll start a company building space ships and sell them to the general public.
First test flight was unmanned. Have to test with astronauts eventually.
Every manned space flight risks people's lives.
The Boeing 737 Max has had several issues in its history. The most significant of these were two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019 in Ethiopia and Indonesia, collectively causing the deaths of 346 people. These crashes were linked to poorly designed cockpit software, resulting in the 737 Max being grounded globally for 20 months. The aircraft was recertified by the FAA for passenger flights in November 2020.
Looks like an updated Apollo design, which makes you wonder why it took so long to design and re-perfect...
Materials study , design aprimoration, costumization per user, regulatores quality standards, politics, etc... They aren't kneeting sweaters there, but complex wearable machines.
"Looks like...". The plaintive wail of the uneducated.
@@MrShobar Roflmao... love the smoothness. 😄😄😄
Are they able to get life insurance for the crew from private insurance companies or are the risks placed on the taxpayers?
Looks like its made of roof repair rubber paint.
After fifty years this spacecraft seems to offer little advance on the Apollo capsules of the time. Indeed, it seems that NASA is stuck in an engineering time warp as far as launch systems and spacecraft are concerned. None of this has been helped by uninformed political meddling.
It's old tech. Decades behind the reusable Dragon. Sad situation. Launcher and capsule expendable. Maybe one launch per year. Wasteful.
First manned launch of Starliner without Astronauts. These guys will be DAREDEVILS. I WOULD NOT GET IN THIS THING! Would you?
No way would I get in it
No one would ever ask you to. You have nothing to offer.
Hope the door doesnt pop open in flight
I wouldn't ride Starliner...
Agree. I would feel more comfortable in the Shuttle being launched at 10 degrees
😂😂😂
I don’t trust this thing. It’s taken tooooooo, long to fix it. Just drop this damn thing and go with Dragon 🐉.
No way there will be a problem with starliner. Boeing and NASA knows any failure would end Boeings space operations and they provide so many various services to NASA that they can’t afford a failure. That is why NASA used so many resources making sure Boeing had everything right from parachute cords to tape on the wiring. And yes, the US needs a second orbital rocket crew rated.
👍👍👍
In what sense has it 'happened'? It seems like 'happening' fits better.
Sheesh ! This video sounds like it was made by Boeing ! And I thought it was going to land in Utah ?
This is the biggest taxpayer rip off in decades.
There is no new test flight after having stripped almost the whole inside electronics. If there is a risk of failure, this fight has bingo cards for it. Realy hope the best for the astronauts.
Great Video ! Did you really say the Boeing Starliner is going to land in the Pacific ocean ? An abort on launch will have you land in the Atlantic Ocean ! The mission plan is for the Boeing Starliner to reenter and to parachute for a land landing ! A great video except for this one small error... The NASA leadership killed two Crews of the NASA Space Shuttle and the second Crew could have been saved if NASA had a second launch provider ! The Boeing Starliner can dock with the ISS, the SpaceX Dragon, with another Boeing Starliner and in the future maybe the HLS ! Would I go on the Boeing Starliner ? If I had the option I would wait for the gentle return with the Sierra Space Crew Dream Chaser for a gentle landing on a Spaceport Runway ! ! ! The Tech developed to return to the moon to stay, can take US and the world to Mars and beyond ! tjl
Far too many managers in Boeing company, all pushing paper to throw the table and wasting the engineers time. 😮
Time for a successful mission for the crew, Boeing, NASA and the world. Cheers!! 😎
A FULL DECADE , SCHEDULED FOR 2017,no thanks, it sounds as dangerous as working in boeings saftey department...
SpaceX can't be beat!! SpaceX can enlarge Dragon if it needs too. Starliner Sucks!!!
NASA gives Starliner a 1 in 295 chance of killing its astronauts. Its threshold is 1 in 270.
Crea Dragon 2 was - 1 in 276. So if Starliner sucks, so does Crew Dragon.
[Edited because I said, incorrectly, 1 in 195 at first - which rather destroys my argument...]
Dragon has always been capable of carrying up to 7 Astronauts "comfortably".
Amen brother. SpaceX Rocks!!
Not feeling good about this. Would you trust Boeing
So is this capsule reusable or is that more millions down the drain 😮😮😮😮
Great question. Google says it's reusable up to 10 times, but who knows.
Why even use starliner when spacex exsists, starliner can’t even dock correctly and is orders of magnitude more expensive
Too many one-time launches that have to work. What did we get for 4.6 billion
You of course meant accent. Also thank you for all you do!
I really don't think this is a good idea. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't you think Boeing should prove itself with several, consistent, successful UNCREWED missions of Starliner to the ISS before they put people on it. In my opinion, this is a very poor decision on the part of NASA who is the soul overseer of this whole Starliner project. What are they thinking? Starliner has been nothing but trouble. One problem after another, over and over and over again. The whole Starliner program should have been scrapped years ago. I wouldn't get on one of Boeing's airplanes. And I certainly wouldn't get on their one and only spacecraft that's been a disaster from day one. I don't have a drop of respect for Boeing OR NASA. NASA AND Boeing have made too many careless decisions and mistakes that have cost too many lives. They are both failures in my opinion.
Hopefully, they can complete safely the upcoming mission
Thank you. Yes, I pray all goes well.
Well...... Those in power in our government do not like Elon Musk anymore and they don't want SpaceX to get the contract
Please Boeing and Nasa do not do it. Let this thing go up with cargo. Do not risk people for this POS
No good ideas how Boeing Starliner Crew? Big risk.
I'm happy to know that Starliner will be atop an Atlas V rocket instead of a Falcon 9. I'm assuming this means SpaceX is not involved in this most irresponsible, ridiculous and chance taking mission that NASA and Boeing are so famous for. One thing that stands out to me for both of these companies; neither one have a drop of common sense. SpaceX, on the other hand, is overflowing with common sense AND they employ the most intelligent engineers in the world. GO SPACEX!!
🚀🚀🚀
NASA is not a company. It is an independent agency of the government.
Starliner......? Nope! That is a space wagon. That is the old Apollo capsule with a bunch of upgrades. It's about as innovative as gorilla tape is to duct tape. That's what the lowest bidder could produce.
Well done NASA. A very anticlimactic development in your return to space.
NASA, struggling with holding on to funding, their manned missions become increasingly difficult to rationalize. SpaceX has the edge without huge taxpayer funding, Congress watching. Believe this only further demonstrates NASA’s inability to compete.
Very risky.
👍👍👍
Where did i read its canceled again?
Nope
You know, I’ve noticed a lot of errors in great SpaceX post before, but the Boeing Starliner is designed to land on land not splash down in the Pacific Ocean. It’s more more obvious this great SpaceX channel is nothing but Clickbait way too many errors.
Thanks for your comment. We'll take note this and work better in the future, so keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️
Splashing into the sea is a condition of NASA, but not the idea of SpaceX!
@@Dragonych1976 that are talking about Boeing Strainer not Spacex Dragon
If, I were an Astronaut, I would decline NASA junk.
Huh? It's made by Boeing.
who is Kevin?
I do this voice recording
Has anyone checked the most important statuses. The amounts of $$$$ that will be made available for upper echelon management's bonus checks enhancements if the mission is a success versus a failure. Really depends on those amounts on what happens.
good luck to them. You couldn't pay me to ride on that turd.
Within the household, if you're spending more than you're bringing in, you have two choices. Make more or spend less. Pretty simple. It's called budgeting. Our government is spending roughly 2 trillion dollars more per year than what we are taking in. Remember, this is your money. And they've been doing this for years. And it's getting worse. What's really going on? We need a businessman as president; not a politician. Folks, if the citizens of this country don't step up and demand a change, the United States of America, as we know it, will be gone within just a few years. And as citizens of this great country, it is a real disservice to our children and grandchildren to sit back and do nothing because they're the ones that are going to suffer the most. The United States used to be very well respected. Now we are the laughingstock of the world.
35 trillion in debt. If you stop the freebies they will burn the cities
no disrespected but most of your politicians are businessmen/women... they simply become politicians in order to pass laws to support their stock and share investments. if a full on business person with no political training were to be in charge you get literal criminals such as trump in charge of your country. realistically depending on what business they profiteer from they would start world war 3 to help grow their profits on manufacturing weapons
Then stop giving massive tax breaks to the uber wealthy. That's what tRump did.
Eat meat
Buy Gold.
It is landing in White Sands Space Harbour and not the Pacific. Parachutes and heatshields also caused a delay to Dragon and it was not a new craft but a redesign of an existing cargo craft. I really wish people would be more accurate with facts in the SpaceX channels. If Starliner proves itself it will be a real challenge to Dragon due to the larger capacity.
Not a chance. It's way too expensive, SpaceX could fly a dozen to each Starliner.
Not as risky as Crew Dragon 2 was.
wtf?
Turned it off at 4:03….. couldn't take any more of the rediculous, flowery commentary. JDM (not Linda)
I wish them well.
With an erratic conman at its head, Space X, for all its achievements, remains a risky company to rely on. Both Tesla and Twitter are on shaky ground, and I worry that the collapse of either company could start a domino effect that could impact Space X. I want them to succeed, but Musk does not fill me with confidence. Meanwhile, Starliner is the back-up that may become important if Space X falters.
I trust NASA, when they say ULA and Boeing are ready to launch. This channel is obviously a Elon fan boy. I bet it took months to cum up with this channel name - how original.
Tanks for the love
scam!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A bit of intelligent commentary or analysis would be helpful.
According to my diary this flight happened yesterday.
It will be launched at 10:34 pm EDT on May 6
Your diary is from 2023.
Make sure after take off you stay aware of where the thing is going to crash
Boeing is a joke nowadays
This is the time for wishing
The "Cybertruck", E-Lawn's brainchild, is an absolute joke.