Žižek and the Abyss of Self-Relating Hell

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 кві 2024
  • Treydon Lunot (@telosbound) explains how the Žižekian subject results from self-relating negativity severed from God's communal ontology.
    Watch the full podcast here: • Peter Rollins in Dialo...
    ---------------------------------------
    {Podcast}
    Substack: rsampod.substack.com/
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4ryEqju...
    Anchor: anchor.fm/rahul-samaranayake
    Available on other platforms at link.chtbl.com/PDBAf9Zd
    {Website}
    rahulsam.me/
    {Social Media}
    / trsam97
    / name_is_rahul
    substack.com/@trsam/
    / rahul-samaranayake-981...
    {Reference Links}
    You can also watch Trey's video here: • The Žižekian Subject a...
    ---------------------------------------
    If the ideas I discuss in this channel evoke your interest, consider visiting theunhappyman.substack.com/
    ---------------------------------------
    Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
    Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing.
    If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of the related material, please email me at trahulsam@gmail.com, and we can sort it out. Thank you.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @abdikarim9572
    @abdikarim9572 Місяць тому +1

    that thumbnail should win an award

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  Місяць тому

      Ah haha... I shall take that as a compliment, my friend!

    • @abdikarim9572
      @abdikarim9572 Місяць тому

      @@RahulSam You should because it is beautiful and artistic

  • @Bill-Sama-Gates-Laden
    @Bill-Sama-Gates-Laden Місяць тому

    What is the artwork from the thumbnail, please?

  • @kogutkrulkur8325
    @kogutkrulkur8325 Місяць тому +2

    bla bla bla

  • @lissie3669
    @lissie3669 Місяць тому

    Hellllll no I am not understanding this without reading the book

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  Місяць тому

      Fair point, haha!

  • @lucianozamudio7726
    @lucianozamudio7726 Місяць тому

    this what i was thinking and i didnt even read the book 😁

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  Місяць тому

      Glad to hear. Trey's book 'Aphesis: The Impossibility of Subjectivity' goes into detail on this.

  • @GloryBlazer
    @GloryBlazer Місяць тому

    Is this what religion is about ? god damn. That's pretty interesting.

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  Місяць тому

      This and more. But yes, interesting indeed!

    • @eprd313
      @eprd313 Місяць тому +1

      Re-ligion (from the latin religare) means to re-unite. The thing is, a great deal of the disunity (us vs them or me/my soul vs the world), separation (good vs evil), self-relation (using the terms from the video, or how do I believe a god perceives me and therefore how should I become a vigilante of myself), discomfort and guilt that give rise to the desire for reunification and the need for religion itself, is produced by religions themselves. And this round trip is a great business model, as well as a great tool for political control. At the end, by joining a religion, it's very easy to end up idolising the means for re-unification while perpetuating and even worsening the divisions. Or like the zen masters like to say: don't be enthralled by the finger that points to the moon.

    • @eprd313
      @eprd313 Місяць тому

      The other thing is, no matter what you do, believe, think or say, pursuing unification is destined to fail. Once you understand that duality is an illusion created by the mind, it becomes clear that there's nothing real to address. Any search or pursuit only feeds the illusion. There's nothing real that is broken, nothing to re-unite, nothing missing, nothing to do, no one in control, and the world becomes a living paradox.