MBR, MBBR and FBR (Part 2) - Comparison of wastewater technologies

3 Minute Water and Waste Water Video Tutorials by AET
For more information or comments contact us here: www.aqua-equip.com/
Water testing equipment here: www.aqua-equip.com/parts/
The comparison of the three systems show different advantages and disadvantages for industrial wastewater applications:
1. Effluent water quality: MBRs show in general a slightly better BOD removal than MBBRs or FBBRs. Very fine membranes can even hold back germs so that the water effluent quality is in general better.
2. Resistance to influent peaks and grease leaks: MBRs are very sensitive to changing influent values. Grease leaks will cause clogging of the fine membranes so that they must be cleaned or replaced. MBBRs are less sensitive as MBRs although the risk of fill media clogging is high in case of interrupted mixing and grease leaks. Instead FBRs are very robust and show a very good handling of either changing influent values, grease leaks and interrupted oxygen supply.
3. Difficulty level of operation: MBRs require monitoring of the activated sludge process as well as backwashing of the membranes in certain intervals. Therefore, their operation can be challenging and higher qualifications are necessary. MBBRs and FBRs are more forgiving and especially FBRs are easy to operate.
4. Required space: The higher MLSS level of MBRs allow more BOD removal per water volume. Therefore, their required space is lower compared to MBBRs and FBBRs.
5. Energy consumption: Due to Higher MLSS, permanent backwashing of the membrane and fouling prevention, MBRs need a high air volume thus have a high energy demand and cost. FBRs require less energy as MBBRs because the air supply of the biofilm is installed directly underneath the fill media which results in a better oxygen intake.
6. Overall cost: The installation costs for all three systems are about the same. However over time MBRs are more expensive than MBBRs and FBBRs because of higher operational and maintenance costs.
All in all, MBRs are a good fit for applications that require a high-quality water effluent. Instead, MBBRs and especially FBBRs are a good solution for pretreatment of high BOD levels. Their resistant and forgiving design make them suitable for various industrial wastewater applications. Additionally, the easy operation and maintenance, guarantee a long-life time product solution for low cost in the long term.

[@halokdebbarma9342]

Your videos are actually being used in our University to teach by professors😁
Really authentic source

[@ramonlucas2913]

great!

[@yourcat4210]

well explained

[@omarabduljaleelaltuwaijari4754]

Thank you...Omar Baghdad university

[@billwheeler1213]

Well explained, I have worked with MBR's for 15 years, many engineering firms install them for applications they are not the best suited for and improperly train the operators and explain to clients the high lifetime maintenance costs. There are so many other technologies out that are better in many cases...(a conventional operator sometimes has to re-learn thier discipline and forget what they think they know to run them)

[@karl-uweschmitz3028]

100% agree.

[@hadyanarisyi10]

Greay video! But i have a question, on FBBR what type of medium it's usually used? Thanks in advance!

[@karl-uweschmitz3028]

We manufacturing our own media. Its a PP plastic fill media type with vertical channels. You can find more info also on our website www.aqua-equip.com

[@muthamilselvankaruppiah8510]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤