It's because the monitor can output only 60fps but the advantage of 144 fps on the 60 hz monitor is that there will be less input latency compared to 60 fps on 60hz monitor
However... a great way to actually show the difference between the two even on a device that can only display 60 fps is to show a comparison but in slomo
@@rlipka1 i watch this in a 144hz monitor but thats not the problem at all. The problem is you can only display this video at 1080@60 so you wont appreciate 144fps
@@khan.hassan ofcourse. Check the resolution setting of the video. It says 720p60, 1080p60, 1440p60 etc. The 60 resembles the frame rate of the video. UA-cam is capped at 60 fps max
If you have a 144hz display phone and play a game that supports it, and compare it to a 60hz disply phone with the sme game, you *can* see the difference. If you meant youtube, then even if you had a 360hz display, youtube will still show at 60 fps
Yeah. I was playing Enlisted yesterday and I got 12fps then changed everything to either off or low and got that amazing 28.9fps. This thought me never to look down on people.
I remember thinking exactly that when playing world of warcraft with lowest settings on 1024x768 or 800x600. I used to get 40 fps when looking at the ground or sky. I got kicked from so many raids because of not registering my inputs or because people were impatient as I was in loading screen (they must've thought I disconnected or smt). Still I managed to get over 150 mounts in Cata with best gear in PvE and PvP. So fucking hardcore if I think about it now.
@@Nova-ju2cm That also, but most of the screens are 60hz, very few of them are 30hz, mostly in tvs. I fourtanetly have 144hz screen, but i see no difference between 60 and 144fps in this video
Well actually, 30 fps looks more laggy if you play games. Video was rendered in 60fps so 30fps is looking smooth in the video which is not smooth in reality.
@@theralf6454 That's exactly the question ! What's the point uploading a FPS video comparison if UA-cam downgrade your video and limit it to 60 fps. The 144 fps you see in this video is not true 144 fps...
30 FPS - Good for story mode games. 60 FPS - Excellent for story mode games and good for online multiplayer games. 144 FPS - Excellent for competitive multiplayer games.
@@alinguist9793 true but i don't mind going back to 60fps. I used to play the most heaviest games with 33fps locked and trust me even that felt smooth, 60fps used to be a dream, now its a reality and im grateful for everything i have right now. I enjoy games, not the frames.
It's funny how when I was a child, I used to play in a laptop that was kind of slow (ha, it was trash, with an athlon and just 1 gb of ram) and always playing around 10 to 15 fps. Right now, I can't understand how I managed to play like that...
You can, I can see the frame differences when the video switches from 60 to 144hz the video might be 60 but the way it's compresses you can really see.. I have an 144hz monitor tho
Exactly! You can play most games well with anything above 30fps (i think in online games players with high fps can have some kind of advantage, but i'm not sure, i don't play online)
@@mathdantastav2496 i mean, you can play it . It isnt perfect, but you can. For me unplayable means when playing it wouldn't be fun anymore. In other words, if your pc can run a game at 30 fps you can play it without many problems. Below that? No, 25, 20 or 10 fps are literally unplayable. The problem with having only 30 fps is that in scenes with a lot of action, explosion and all your fps will probably get to 25 or 20. That's a probrm. But if your pc can maintain stable 30 fps, i don't see why i wouldn't play
60 FPS vs 144 FPS can’t be shown on this video because UA-cam only shows up to 60 FPS. So pretty much, this comparison is useless on UA-cam. I also highly doubt the original recording is even recorded in 144 FPS.
Im built different. Got a 9900k and 3070 with a 144 hz 27in and i swear it is so embarrasing but i feel like an idiot cause i cant see a difference between 60 and 144
Fun fact: UA-cam doesn't show videos in more than 60 fps, so this comparison is useless Edit: it's capped at 60fps on _most_ devices, not all, so it is actually useful for people who have >144hz monitors/screens
UA-cam only allows you to upload videos at a maximum of 60 FPS so even if you have a high refresh rate monitor (which I do) you won’t be able to see any difference
144 fps test is kinda done wrong, the video is uploaded at 60 fps, and many screens are at 60 hz, one way to make it work is to record it at 120 fps, and upload it to youtube at half the speed so we can watch it at 2x and see it at 120 fps
bro think a little further if the video is 144 fps it was more frame density when UA-cam convertes it into 60 it will be smootther, because you have more material and the programme will choose better hey frames. if it was 60 fps to 60 that would be it the yt algorithm coundnt get better frames
@@andrefreitas9936 . . . that's not how that works if anything, the fact that 144hz is an uneven multiple of 60 makes it look far worse. I'd say that the text in the top corner is lying, and the idiot who made this video probably just chose a random clip that looked better than the last and put a higher number on it to get views and keep people interacting with the video.
- 1 to 10 FPS is unusable - 15 is playable, but it would give me a headache after a while - 30 is perfectly fine - 60 feels much smoother - can't comment on 144 because my monitor is 60 Hz
@@sp1ck829 I'm pretty sure rendering a video at higher fps counts than what is being recorded can show some blits or spikes involved or not as accurate frame per second associated with it. It's more a deep learning program. This whole high fps is more understandable if you have a high fps monitor like 240hz like I have.
Showcasing 144 fps on UA-cam is literally pointless. UA-cam doesn't show it, and most people's TV/Monitor/phones do not support it unless you have a current gen flagship. Even then it may be 90hz. You got to see one in person to experience it.
Actually have the playback in 144fps then ask if we can see the difference, but yes every level from 1-60 was a clear difference. After that UA-cam took over and limited to 60.
@@PieVio I can't tell if you're joking or serious, but just in case, yes we absolutely can lmao. Even going from 60hz to 75hz already is quite noticeable, and more importantly, feels a lot smoother, which is the main point here, how it looks doesn't matter anywhere as much as how it feels, and games at a high fps always feel more responsive, smooth and precise. Even if your eyes actually couldn't see it, you would absolutely feel the difference when you play at 144hz vs 60hz.
@@PieVio your somewhst right, we dont see in frames at all, its analog, information is constantly beinf sent to our brains, depending on hundreds of different things tnis number fluctuates, one momemt we could see 300, the other just 60.
My friend, you know that we cannot see the difference between 60 and 144 frames because UA-cam does not provide more than 60 frames. Personally, I watch the video from a 144-Hz screen. But that doesn't help🙄
This video only raises questions. Why is 2fps shown as 1fps? Why would you try to showcase 144fps on a 60fps capped platform? In which part of GTA V can you play Forza?
Can you see the difference? 😙
Intel HD 4000 vs RTX 3090 👇
ua-cam.com/video/brsFAePWn5Q/v-deo.html
60 fps is good .
No man it's the same
i see .
**me watching from my crappy 45hz monitor**
I dunno, can you?
see what?
I just realized that I completed NFS rivals on 10 fps
True gamer 👍
Exactly... Same with me
Jajajajajajaja I have completed gta 5 at 15 fps and with lag
@@DJSMILEMUSIC so ?
@@REALLYrandomforya who the hell are you
Let them discuss
i like how 144 and 60 are the same because youtube caps at 60
@@Crsevey "L"mao not lmao.
lol wtf is imao
UA-cam caps at 60 but if you put the video on slow mo you'll see the different it's smoother.
Imao
lmao
it's fun to try to spot the difference between 60 and 144 fps on 60 hz display
even if your screen display 144 hz, the video is 60 fps.
it's fun to try to spot the difference between 60 and 144 fps with a video outputting max 60fps
@@brkhnzn 99% people in the comment section has no awarness of how youtube works lol
@@fkutw4tt3rtub3
Some people say their phone can display 4k even on their 1080p display, just because youtube allows it now 🤦
What's the point of bringing 144 FPS to the table if UA-cam only supports up to 60 FPS?
Yeah
yep
Google is actually planing to put 144hz on UA-cam
No you can do higher I've seen it and could tell on a 144hz monitor before
Low end pc gamers gang will never die we finish games but with a lot of lags and frame drops
I finished Cod 2 on 640x480 lowest with 40 fps.
@@l3sc4you are a true gamer
@@xeno8829 ty. 🥰👍🏻😁
wtf how
@@Karma-bq2sg cuz they are grateful gamers
144fps on a 60fps monitor looks the same as 60fps for some reason i wonder why
It's because the monitor can output only 60fps but the advantage of 144 fps on the 60 hz monitor is that there will be less input latency compared to 60 fps on 60hz monitor
@@noone-jc6be ever heard of sarcasm? But nice explanation.
@@awsmchicken hey sorry. I thought you were serious.
@@noone-jc6be all good mate
It's your monitor is only 60hz most likely
UA-cam: 60FPS limit
Video: attempts to show 144FPS
FUN FACT --- we can`t find any difference between 60fps and 144fps because our devices can only play this video in 60fps ......
However... a great way to actually show the difference between the two even on a device that can only display 60 fps is to show a comparison but in slomo
You didn't find any difference because YT can show only 60fps ;)
(1080p60fps.)
@@Hardvertesztelő boo actually I watched that on laptop 😂😂 btw nyc try😂😂
@@simar3070 try watching it on a 144hz monitor dummie
@@rlipka1 i watch this in a 144hz monitor but thats not the problem at all. The problem is you can only display this video at 1080@60 so you wont appreciate 144fps
15 to 30fps club right here 🙋🙋
25 Fps me jaja
All in
Same here bro
Buy new PC
@@gibon3351 I'm broke bro
UA-cam capped the video at 60 fps, so it's quite impossible to notice the difference between 60 and 144 fps. : (
Yes bro
Really?
@@khan.hassan yea
@@khan.hassan ofcourse. Check the resolution setting of the video. It says 720p60, 1080p60, 1440p60 etc. The 60 resembles the frame rate of the video. UA-cam is capped at 60 fps max
Yt is capped at 60fps bro
We can't see differences between 60 and 144 on 60hz mobile phones 😭
On UA-cam* I have 90hz phone
bruh you think youtube shows 144 fps?
My phone is 120hz
You mean *on UA-cam
not much of a difference
If you have a 144hz display phone and play a game that supports it, and compare it to a 60hz disply phone with the sme game, you *can* see the difference. If you meant youtube, then even if you had a 360hz display, youtube will still show at 60 fps
1 FPS was not actually 1 FPS
It was around 2FPS
I was looking for this comment
Its between 2-5fps i think
Nah it is 5fps
1:47 "144 fps"
UA-cam: 60 take it or leave it
i was wondering for a good minute why I couldn't tell the difference then remembered this exact thing
(im using a 144hz monitor, thats why confused)
@@charleswratteneassie3997 play video at 0.25x speed to see the difference between 144fps and 60fps.
@@VegitoBlackityBlack oh yeah true, thanks
UA-cam only supports up to 60 fps so there is no difference between 60 fps and 144 fps in this video
Well you don't actually see and difference after 60fps even if your display supports more because UA-cam caps it at 60.
Video : 144 fps
UA-cam : 60 fps
My phone : 30 fps
Hotel : Trivago
Never Gonna: Give you up
@@strelok9376 um br em um lugar que n imaginaria
Low end gamers when their FPS increases from 15 to 30
Look at how smooth it is!
You wouldnt believe how smooth the game looks when the frames jump from 5 to 20
Yeah. I was playing Enlisted yesterday and I got 12fps then changed everything to either off or low and got that amazing 28.9fps.
This thought me never to look down on people.
I can't really see a difference between 15 and 30 fps in this video to be honest.
@@bartvancapelle562 Well but lowspec gamers always knows different between 1 fps
I remember thinking exactly that when playing world of warcraft with lowest settings on 1024x768 or 800x600. I used to get 40 fps when looking at the ground or sky. I got kicked from so many raids because of not registering my inputs or because people were impatient as I was in loading screen (they must've thought I disconnected or smt). Still I managed to get over 150 mounts in Cata with best gear in PvE and PvP. So fucking hardcore if I think about it now.
U guys getting frames per second? I'm getting seconds per frame
lmao
And what about my FPM (frame per minute) 😂
🙌👍
😂😂😂😂😂
Im getting 30 MPT (minutes per toilet)
That "1 fps" was definitely more than 1 fps
Yea 1fps is actually 5
Tbh 1 fps looked like 4 fps if you look at it carefully and count how many frames it has in a second
Yeah 5fps, de all saw it xD
I love how he includes 144fps, as if you can show it on YT.
Beyond 60 FPS we can't see the difference in YT because its limit is just 60 FPS
No YT says the vid is 60fps but you can do higher I've seen vids like that on a 144hz screen and it's amazing.
"144fps"
youtube: I'll give you 60
Yeah it says 60 but you can do 144 or higher on UA-cam and it works; I've seen videos like that on high hz displays and I could tell.
I love that there is comparison between 60 and 144 fps, when the video can play up to 60 fps.
Also, most of the people have a 60hz screen or less lol
@@Nova-ju2cm That also, but most of the screens are 60hz, very few of them are 30hz, mostly in tvs. I fourtanetly have 144hz screen, but i see no difference between 60 and 144fps in this video
Well the video caps at 60 fps
Dont forget motion blur
I usually can't stand 30 fps gameplay but seeing the 30 fps clip after the 1-10 fps clips was a relief lmao
Well actually, 30 fps looks more laggy if you play games. Video was rendered in 60fps so 30fps is looking smooth in the video which is not smooth in reality.
Comparing 60 fps vs 144 fps while youtube encoded the video in 60 fps. xD
Like, what's the point?
@@theralf6454 That's exactly the question ! What's the point uploading a FPS video comparison if UA-cam downgrade your video and limit it to 60 fps. The 144 fps you see in this video is not true 144 fps...
@@theralf6454 u cant see 144hz
I've seen 190fps on UA-cam on a 144hz monitor and it was clear
@@WarpSonic One word: "Interpolation"
UA-cam is locked at 60 FPS so none of us would be able to see a difference and you’d need a 144 hz monitor to really see the difference.
i play on 144fps so i know the difference lol
30 FPS always looks rather smooth on youtube etc. but never does when actually playing the game
more important if you moving your mouse and turning your view... than even less than 100 fps is clear noticeable and become better with 140 to 160 fps
UA-cam videos are capped to 60 fps, so even if u have a 144hz+ monitor, you won't even see a difference in UA-cam.
"60hz vs 144hz"
Me watching on 60hz screen🤓
Agree haha
yessss
And yt showing on 30
Yt only supports maximum 60hz...
I have 120hz screen on my phone but video is 60 fps only though I feel the difference between 60 fps and 120 fps in interface of the phone.
What's the point of showing 144fps when UA-cam only supports 60 🤣🤣🤣
Shows 144FPS on a YT video that can only show 60FPS xD
ksksks
Yeah xD
0:01 Bro did you steal my laptop to record this
i think he did, thief!! dislike!!
I thought it was recorded in mine
30 FPS - Good for story mode games.
60 FPS - Excellent for story mode games and good for online multiplayer games.
144 FPS - Excellent for competitive multiplayer games.
i agree 👌
Nah dude. Once you play at 144fps, 60fps feels just so laggy.
@@alinguist9793 noticeable but not that much....EDIT : 60 FPS IS MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR STORY GAMES.
1 FPS - Good for testing patience
@@alinguist9793 true but i don't mind going back to 60fps. I used to play the most heaviest games with 33fps locked and trust me even that felt smooth, 60fps used to be a dream, now its a reality and im grateful for everything i have right now. I enjoy games, not the frames.
Me: *watches a 30 fps video at 2x speed to get 60fps*
Also me: maybe i'm smart
UA-cam won't go above 60fps
The actualy problem is that UA-cam can record videos in a maximum of 60 fps/Hz. 🙁
Fun fact: This video actually doesn't show you 144fps cuz UA-cam's limit is 60fps and they'll look the same.
You're welcome.
Funny vid bro! Showing us 144Fps gameplay with a video that only has 6OFps :--7
144 frames
Video is caped at 60
Umm... "1 fps" was more like 3 fps. At 1 fps, you should only be able to see one image per every second, and it was definitely more than that
Everyone has been recommended this in the past 5 mins
And i did not even noticed the transition of 60 fps to 144 fps. Maybe probably due to my phone's screen.
UA-cam videos are capped at 60fps
Don't expect to see difference between 60fps and 144fps on a 60pfs screen
Don't expect to see 144fps in a youtube video. YT limits it to 60.
People watching this on 60hz monitor : *60 and 144 are the same*
Either way, UA-cam can only output video at a maximum of 60 FPS
xd if you have 144hz monitor you still can see only 60 frames because youtube allows only 60fps
But am watching on 120hz display
@@allcreativitychannel6726 but this video was encoded back to 60 fps by youtube.
It's funny how when I was a child, I used to play in a laptop that was kind of slow (ha, it was trash, with an athlon and just 1 gb of ram) and always playing around 10 to 15 fps. Right now, I can't understand how I managed to play like that...
60 fps is the limit in you tube i think so 144 fps doesn't look different in this video
idk why 10 fps just feels soo good man
idk too but youre right
144fps on UA-cam. Ok. It's stuck at 60fps
no u should noticed cornercuts perfectly at 144fps
Does FPS matters?
Short answer: YES
Long answer: YES IT DOES
there I saved your 2 min 54 seconds
Short: thanks
Long: thank you great sir
@@demon_guy Short: thank you great sir
Long: thank you so much great sir
Thank you 😎
You cant tell the difference between 144 fps and 60 fps on UA-cam because the max for youtube is 60fps
yeah it's useless to try and upload stuff like that.
You can, I can see the frame differences when the video switches from 60 to 144hz the video might be 60 but the way it's compresses you can really see.. I have an 144hz monitor tho
@@luisrosales4750 that might be frame blending. in the stats for the video it's definetly 60fps.
@@Stockinzs Dunno but I do see a difference
You can't see difference between 60fps and 144fps, because youtube simply just doesn't support anything above 60fps.
He:- Showing 144fps in 60 fps video
Me:- Interesting
If you don't have a high Hz screen then past 1:46 you won't notice any difference... Also, I'm not even sure if YT supports higher FPS than 60FPS
It don’t support anything more than 60
Watching 144 FPS on a 60 FPS video...
It makes no sense.
i am watching on 30 fps monitor so even 60 fps doesnt make sense
Approved
@@shafishaz2486 30fps monitors don't exist
@@aquacool i meant the phone not pc monitor
@@shafishaz2486 oh sorry
You cant see 144 with youtube... The difference is actually realy big ^^
Having constant or stable fps is more important than having high fps.
Exactly! You can play most games well with anything above 30fps (i think in online games players with high fps can have some kind of advantage, but i'm not sure, i don't play online)
@@mathdantastav2496 i mean, you can play it . It isnt perfect, but you can. For me unplayable means when playing it wouldn't be fun anymore.
In other words, if your pc can run a game at 30 fps you can play it without many problems. Below that? No, 25, 20 or 10 fps are literally unplayable.
The problem with having only 30 fps is that in scenes with a lot of action, explosion and all your fps will probably get to 25 or 20. That's a probrm. But if your pc can maintain stable 30 fps, i don't see why i wouldn't play
60 FPS vs 144 FPS can’t be shown on this video because UA-cam only shows up to 60 FPS. So pretty much, this comparison is useless on UA-cam. I also highly doubt the original recording is even recorded in 144 FPS.
Can we even differentiate between 60fps and 144fps on our screen it only supports 60fps
No, the video would have to be in slow motion to actually notice
kinda hard to compare 144fps when the video is in 60fps
You can't see the difference becouse UA-cam only give you maximum 60fps videos.
@@abdullah5ahmad what. No they dont. Ive seen uploads in 4K 144fps
@@EffoVexx link?
@@brandon_nope theres lots of videos uploaded in 4k 144 fps. Idk what channels specifically upload those but ive definitely seen the option before.
@@EffoVexx its literally impossible to do so lmfao
every low spec gamer knows 1 to 30 fps...i played rdr2 in gt 710 with 20 fps 😂😂😂
It's playable, if you play offline
Really it's playable with GT 1030?
@@divyeshparmar9501 gt1030 can run any game 😋
@@Gameplayicu yes i used your config files man!!! thanks for that...please make some more config files video
@@divyeshparmar9501 well i played with gt 710 so of course gt 1030 can run it
Even if you can’t see the difference between 60 and 144 you can for sure feel it while you play
we can't see the difference between 60fps and 144fps because don't have... UA-cam can't support anything up 60 frames per second
@@marcelorossi7368 yep
@@marcelorossi7368 also you need a 144hz screen to see the 144fps
Play the video at 0.25x at 1080p then you'd see the difference
Im built different. Got a 9900k and 3070 with a 144 hz 27in and i swear it is so embarrasing but i feel like an idiot cause i cant see a difference between 60 and 144
Fun fact: UA-cam doesn't show videos in more than 60 fps, so this comparison is useless
Edit: it's capped at 60fps on _most_ devices, not all, so it is actually useful for people who have >144hz monitors/screens
I actually have a 240hz display so youtube shows me 1080p144
@WokeyMChes tqlking about the fps cap on youtube videos which depends on your screen refresh rate
@WokeyMC there id an fps cap depending on your screen ref/rate
UA-cam only allows you to upload videos at a maximum of 60 FPS so even if you have a high refresh rate monitor (which I do) you won’t be able to see any difference
@@Rizzyfella18 r u sure? Cuz videos recorded at 144 fps do render in my pc. In the quality tab it shows as 1080p144
0:03 no, its actually 2 fps u can see that in 1 second there are 2 frames
Quality : Max (1080p60) 😂😂😂
60 vs 144??
From my experience it seems like it just doesn't say anything higher than that
I too like to watch 144 fps on a 60 fps video
We can't actually see the difference between 144 fps and 60 fps on this videos because the video in running at 60 fps. Clickbait
Yes
Video: 144 fps
UA-cam: 60 fps Max 🙄
Hmm yes. I can definitely see the 144fps on a 60fps video
I thought (s)he would slow down the 144 FPS footage for us to be able to see the difference...
I have never seen 30 FPS look so smooth
movies are 24
144 fps test is kinda done wrong, the video is uploaded at 60 fps, and many screens are at 60 hz, one way to make it work is to record it at 120 fps, and upload it to youtube at half the speed so we can watch it at 2x and see it at 120 fps
your wish is my command
ua-cam.com/video/eiRmrtZRo3k/v-deo.html
There is still a difference just because a lot of screens are 60hz doesnt mean you cant see a difference between 60fps and 144fps
@@BerriBets response time would be better, it might also look clearer per frame but you would still only see 60 fps
Or just slow down the playback you can see the smoothness
Play the video at 0.25x at 1080p then you'd see the difference
showing 144hz in youtube where youtube's max fps output is 60, Genius !! __/\__
UA-cam doesn't even support 144 fps so there's no reason why it's here, and your monitor likely doesn't either.
bro think a little further if the video is 144 fps it was more frame density when UA-cam convertes it into 60 it will be smootther, because you have more material and the programme will choose better hey frames. if it was 60 fps to 60 that would be it the yt algorithm coundnt get better frames
@@andrefreitas9936 yes, but that's still not the 144 fps experience that you get in games.
@@andrefreitas9936 . . . that's not how that works
if anything, the fact that 144hz is an uneven multiple of 60 makes it look far worse. I'd say that the text in the top corner is lying, and the idiot who made this video probably just chose a random clip that looked better than the last and put a higher number on it to get views and keep people interacting with the video.
@@user-xu7rp3kw3z AHAHAHAH love it i study how this works, people really got some creativity
@@user-xu7rp3kw3z But your point is quite interesting
If you want to see 0 fps, pause the video
If you want to see the game crashing, pause the video then get out from UA-cam
🤣🤣
- 1 to 10 FPS is unusable
- 15 is playable, but it would give me a headache after a while
- 30 is perfectly fine
- 60 feels much smoother
- can't comment on 144 because my monitor is 60 Hz
And UA-cam maximal hz is 60 😄
But still grasses are less blurry on 144.. can’t see fully but small differences are visible
I have a 365 fps monitor because my eyesight is terrible its asus
UA-cam support 60 fps.. so 144 was also 60 only
youtube doesn't support 144fps
but you can render ur vid at 144, 240, 360 and more fps with big difference in video. just use OBS ans sony vegas
@@sp1ck829 I'm pretty sure rendering a video at higher fps counts than what is being recorded can show some blits or spikes involved or not as accurate frame per second associated with it. It's more a deep learning program. This whole high fps is more understandable if you have a high fps monitor like 240hz like I have.
this guy: shows vid at 144 fps
me watching it at 480p 30 fps: kool
Bruh I am watching from my phone (wich is at most 60hz lol)
Everyone, UA-cam only plays back at 60fps so of course at 144 you wont see a difference...
Yeah, when i play with my 144hz, it's so different that all other
You can’t tell the difference between 60fps and 144fps because youtube’s compression system automatically makes videos 60fps.
Showcasing 144 fps on UA-cam is literally pointless. UA-cam doesn't show it, and most people's TV/Monitor/phones do not support it unless you have a current gen flagship. Even then it may be 90hz. You got to see one in person to experience it.
lol ok
How are you verified. Big bot moment
@@rocketpencil5948 no u
Seriously? 144 fps in a 60fps video? 😒
Sm question???
UA-cam cannot display 144 fps just 60
60 and 144 are same thing because UA-cam caps at 60
A stable 30-40 fps is all I need for all games
Taking about racing , story , simulation & building games . Shooter games def need 70+fps
U don't play shooter games don't ya?
For story / single player games : yes
For shooter / competitive games : hell no
showing a difference between 60 and 144 fps video when hinghest yt settings is 60
Actually have the playback in 144fps then ask if we can see the difference, but yes every level from 1-60 was a clear difference. After that UA-cam took over and limited to 60.
guys.. remember you can't see over 60 fps in youtube videos.. so yea, kinda pointless
Good luck seeing 144 fps on a 60 fps video
Human eye cannot see more than 60 frames per sec.. BTW
@@PieVio I can't tell if you're joking or serious, but just in case, yes we absolutely can lmao. Even going from 60hz to 75hz already is quite noticeable, and more importantly, feels a lot smoother, which is the main point here, how it looks doesn't matter anywhere as much as how it feels, and games at a high fps always feel more responsive, smooth and precise. Even if your eyes actually couldn't see it, you would absolutely feel the difference when you play at 144hz vs 60hz.
@@PieVio your somewhst right, we dont see in frames at all, its analog, information is constantly beinf sent to our brains, depending on hundreds of different things tnis number fluctuates, one momemt we could see 300, the other just 60.
How can i know the difference between 60fps and 144fps youtube only has 60fps settings
It's really disappointing that all those years, I've been playing it at 1 FPS :(
Me watching 144 FPS on youtube at 1080p 60fps: "Ah yes much smoother than 60"
doesn't youtube only do 1080p 60 though so 144hz won't show
Yeah.
You can’t show 144hz footage on youtube, let alone on an average 60hz display
U cna with a different profile called codec
-Me, looking on a 30 Hz refresh screen
"Well, most of them looks pretty similar to me "
30Hz doesn't exist. It's 50Hz minimum (TVs) or 60Hz minimum for anything else.
@@wheezel55 Lol
@@wheezel55 My tablet (that I don't use anymore) and my old phone had 30hz screens. When I got my current phone with 60hz it looked so smooth.
@@tmdosu Which phone and tablet? Even in the 2000s screens were 60Hz
@@wheezel55 imgur.com/a/rtpNlaQ
wrong there lad
My friend, you know that we cannot see the difference between 60 and 144 frames because UA-cam does not provide more than 60 frames.
Personally, I watch the video from a 144-Hz screen. But that doesn't help🙄
UA-cam supports 60fps max so even if you have 144hz phone that doesn’t make a difference for this video.
you can t show 144 fps youtube don't support it
1 fps : cry for your game
144 fps : cry for your kidney
😭😭🤣
not that expensive, lmao. 144fps is possible on medium with a gtx 1650 in some games
@@wheezel55 if your gonna put some serious cash into a gaming pc you better make sure it's future proof.
@@wheezel55 I know because I have a 240 hz but I said so for the joke
This video only raises questions. Why is 2fps shown as 1fps? Why would you try to showcase 144fps on a 60fps capped platform? In which part of GTA V can you play Forza?
LMAO didn’t even realize the game was categorized as “GTA V” until this comment hahahaha
@@oshotz i didn't realize GTA V was released in fucking 2013!!! That's 8 years