but you wouldn't be commenting on this video if that was the title so the uploader accomplished his goal. is he/she hallow and soulless? yes, yes he/she is.
it's called... Sensationalism.... it started in the states. Just to get people to click like blind zombies for the benefit of the person uploading the video. it's disgusting yes
The hectic & almost musical drumming of the collective chess clocks in the playing hall was exciting enough for me to make me wanna start playing O.T.B tournaments all over again !!
The only explanation for the title is that there was a large rating gap between the players and the lower rated one won, but I'm too lazy to do that research
@@scottrackley4457 I may not be a "critical" thinker of chess. But I do enjoy what I feel is great and comment. No offense I did not ask you to comment on my comment. I enjoy small things in life.
@@laurentg.6440 Yes you're right! Ok then maybe the way to go was exchanging queens at 5:24, then playing rook f2 instead of f1. Still not a pleasant position with the pressure on the bishop, but maybe she could have escaped.
Actually I think the blunder happened earlier. 5:29 was the consequence. Rb1 was the blunder, getting her rook pinned by protecting the bishop. I wonder if Bc3 would have been better.
@@n40798 if the player in white decides to use his left hand in moving pieces in order to be closer with the clock it is his prerogative. But in most rule, the clock should be in the right side of the black pieces.
The distance between the piece and the clock is exactly the same, irrespectively of which hand you make the move with. The home position of the hands in turn is also in the same distance from the pieces, since you sit in the centerline of the board and you don't make the moves with the shoulder ;)
@@drbusay Yes but there is less arm movement if the player with white moves with the left hand. Any tiny bit of energy saved can instead go to a player's decision-making, giving a small advantage, especially in a fast game
Am I missing something or at 4:46 Black blundered a knight? She takes the pawn and offers a trade of queens, but queen is only protected by knight on d7, if white takes the queen, black is forced to recapture with the knight, and then bishop takes knight. Have I missed anything?
Why don't you open your eyes and use your brain to work out what board they are using? It's really not that difficult given that the brand name is stamped on the side. Sheesh. With that intellect, do you really play chess?
I don't see how White did not take her opponent seriously. Looks like White did not fully realize the winning potential of connected passed pawns and a better place King.
@@bartleysen3652 I'm quiet sick of those lefty aggressive 'political correct' people nowadays, who thinks: they can attack everyone, because of 'imaginated concepts of morality' ... Learn to be a truly worthful piece of society... First step for you: aknowledge, that Scott Stanley didnt offended anyone with a compliment. Second step for you: learn to aknowledge: humans and situation AREN'T made of one property only ; meaning: Scott Stanley is probably ABLE to aknowledge AND respect the chess-skills of the woman AS SAME, as he like her optical appearence. Third step: learn to think logical, before you assume, that another person 'is an asshole'. Meaning: the fact that Scott Stanley was on this video - a chess video - where the players in the thumbnail are barely to see, proves : he was probably really FIRSTLY interested in the chess-game , and later on he recognized that he likes the optical appearence of the player... Also falls into my third step of recommendation to you: a logical thing ALSO is : there is NO need to force insults to someone (like 'she is really fat' ), when he can make compliments to a woman, how attractive she is, according to him. MEANING: its totally fine only to say compliments, if someone feels that way, and hold the mouth still, when he doesnt have to say something nice about the other person. All these are advices, which usually parents teach kids .. I dont know your age - but hopefully, know you know those things - how to behave.. Because its an asshole-behavior to threat a person like shit, and find a way to define how and why the other person is 'shit' , when the other person just made a nice compliment. He DIDNT robs the respect for a good chessplayer with that compliment. And with this, he didnt insulted other player as 'fat' , 'ugly' etc... And if you dont understand these basics of behavior - ask your parents about it , and tell them this situation ;) - Tell them , what Scott Stanley did 'terrible' with those three small words against humanity and mankind in general... ;) - and how 'heroic' , and peaceful your answer was. And if you still not understand, than i have to go throw up , a second time, because of what you are.
She's playing seriously...it was just a blunder that made her lost the game... But if she had decided to exchange queens...it is dubious for black to have a good end game...yes slight advantage but i think white can neutralize it..in the end game..
Yes, she should have initiated the queen swap. After black recaptures her queen she can defend the double rook attack on the bishop with the F rook from f3 to f2. Or she could have moved Rf2 in the first place instead of F1
A better caption would have been “Unremarkable game at an anonymous tournament with a disappointing endgame.”
but you wouldn't be commenting on this video if that was the title so the uploader accomplished his goal. is he/she hallow and soulless? yes, yes he/she is.
only unremarkable players comment on unremarkable games including all the upvotes from his minions.
@Mikkel Grabinski I'm a fan of freedom, justice and the American way. Except for the parts where we eat lots of fast food. lol
one of my buddies told me: "The only way you beat me is if I make a mistake."
@@henrywood9713 you cared enough to reply.
Caption doesn't make sense. I don't think either player avoided taking their opponent seriously.
Agreed!
it's called... Sensationalism.... it started in the states. Just to get people to click like blind zombies for the benefit of the person uploading the video. it's disgusting yes
@Kiflaam shut your mouth and keyboard and sit your ass down
The hectic & almost musical drumming of the collective chess clocks in the playing hall was exciting enough for me to make me wanna start playing O.T.B tournaments all over again !!
and also all the chairs fucking moving! jesus!!!!!! stay put people!!
Title is misleading it seems.
Interesting game. Black gave some chances later for white to balance out but it was always probably lost.
The only explanation for the title is that there was a large rating gap between the players and the lower rated one won, but I'm too lazy to do that research
The middle game was amazing. Opponent was surprised.
you call that amazing?
@@scottrackley4457 I may not be a "critical" thinker of chess. But I do enjoy what I feel is great and comment. No offense I did not ask you to comment on my comment. I enjoy small things in life.
@@manjunathswamy2270 no, I asked you if you called that amazing, you supplied everything else
@@scottrackley4457 To me it was amazing.
Although the white player,.. she is rather cute
you're rather cute :3
At 5:32 she had to take back with the bishop. Blunders happen all the time, especially in faster time formats.
Look better. She would have lost a rook instead...
@@laurentg.6440 Yes you're right! Ok then maybe the way to go was exchanging queens at 5:24, then playing rook f2 instead of f1. Still not a pleasant position with the pressure on the bishop, but maybe she could have escaped.
Kinda hard to follow. Maybe put a 2d version of the match on screen?
I agree!
5:26 on white capture knight by rook ( rook f 5 ) instead of back rook to F 1
Anastasia Sinitsyna (Estonia) is WFM...And the caption is absolute nonsense...
The title was for the 3rd board white was playing against a 2-year-old and lost.
I'm not looking at the chesboard, I was just looking at the player
She was completely busted. When I saw the title, I thought she beat him convincingly. I don't understand the title.
What HIM? Both players are GIRLS!
Fast is fast but accuracy is final!
5:29 it was blunder. And look at her expression after that.
Actually I think the blunder happened earlier. 5:29 was the consequence. Rb1 was the blunder, getting her rook pinned by protecting the bishop. I wonder if Bc3 would have been better.
Why do so many right handed players make moves with their right hand when playing white? Isn't it easier and faster to use the left?
I think whichever hand pick the piece the same hand should be used to touch the clock.
@@freddiecapillan8689 Yeah but the clock is to the left of the white player, they would save time if they used their left hand
@@n40798 if the player in white decides to use his left hand in moving pieces in order to be closer with the clock it is his prerogative. But in most rule, the clock should be in the right side of the black pieces.
The distance between the piece and the clock is exactly the same, irrespectively of which hand you make the move with. The home position of the hands in turn is also in the same distance from the pieces, since you sit in the centerline of the board and you don't make the moves with the shoulder ;)
@@drbusay Yes but there is less arm movement if the player with white moves with the left hand. Any tiny bit of energy saved can instead go to a player's decision-making, giving a small advantage, especially in a fast game
Am I missing something or at 4:46 Black blundered a knight? She takes the pawn and offers a trade of queens, but queen is only protected by knight on d7, if white takes the queen, black is forced to recapture with the knight, and then bishop takes knight. Have I missed anything?
Then black will take a free rook
Aku seneng catur catur
At this rating you can not expect more
Good fight!
Nice game
Rb1 blunder move. It should be Bc3.
Whe wanted to set her battery along the big diagonale. She was not paying any atention to her opponent. Very bad play...
could you tell me where to get a nice board like that, i mean this exactly board
www.chessbaron.co.uk/category/dgt_electronic_boards.php?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIsbz8q6L45AIVRYfVCh3rHgKvEAAYASAAEgLFP_D_BwE
@@leightonjames341 thank you!
www.walmart.com/ip/Chess-Set/29138179
@@garyortolano7374 you made me click LOL
Why don't you open your eyes and use your brain to work out what board they are using? It's really not that difficult given that the brand name is stamped on the side. Sheesh. With that intellect, do you really play chess?
@ 9:50 the white king between the clock annoys me too much.
I don't see how White did not take her opponent seriously. Looks like White did not fully realize the winning potential of connected passed pawns and a better place King.
Imho white should have resigned many moves before this ending. She probably was hoping that her opponent will do a blunder because of time.
Always one person late.
"DD, ObolonkzevaA, AnnaLada*Blondie, areMyAngelsChessssshhhh.........."
Could someone link me the chess set they are playing on :)?=
Si n i t s in a ' - b l a y i k /;
The standard set for DGT boards.
Theres a QR code on the side. This might help.
Shes really pretty
Scott Stanley pervert
@@kewlkid-brawlstars8562 you are ugly
@@bartleysen3652 I'm quiet sick of those lefty aggressive 'political correct' people nowadays, who thinks: they can attack everyone, because of 'imaginated concepts of morality' ...
Learn to be a truly worthful piece of society... First step for you: aknowledge, that Scott Stanley didnt offended anyone with a compliment. Second step for you: learn to aknowledge: humans and situation AREN'T made of one property only ; meaning: Scott Stanley is probably ABLE to aknowledge AND respect the chess-skills of the woman AS SAME, as he like her optical appearence. Third step: learn to think logical, before you assume, that another person 'is an asshole'. Meaning: the fact that Scott Stanley was on this video - a chess video - where the players in the thumbnail are barely to see, proves : he was probably really FIRSTLY interested in the chess-game , and later on he recognized that he likes the optical appearence of the player...
Also falls into my third step of recommendation to you: a logical thing ALSO is : there is NO need to force insults to someone (like 'she is really fat' ), when he can make compliments to a woman, how attractive she is, according to him. MEANING: its totally fine only to say compliments, if someone feels that way, and hold the mouth still, when he doesnt have to say something nice about the other person.
All these are advices, which usually parents teach kids .. I dont know your age - but hopefully, know you know those things - how to behave.. Because its an asshole-behavior to threat a person like shit, and find a way to define how and why the other person is 'shit' , when the other person just made a nice compliment. He DIDNT robs the respect for a good chessplayer with that compliment. And with this, he didnt insulted other player as 'fat' , 'ugly' etc...
And if you dont understand these basics of behavior - ask your parents about it , and tell them this situation ;) - Tell them , what Scott Stanley did 'terrible' with those three small words against humanity and mankind in general... ;) - and how 'heroic' , and peaceful your answer was.
And if you still not understand, than i have to go throw up , a second time, because of what you are.
@Bart Leyson : Your extremely worthful comment to this world, is deleted. Hope thats short enough for your attention span.
the bishop take did it.
22.h6 not great gf was better to open up the h file.
Hmm, looks like 24.Rb1 after 23...Rb8 was the worst mistake. Taking on an totally
great
They white pieces play like Alexander alekhine vs John dreewit
i don't think white underestimated black, misleading caption
Move pawn line H is poor...
RB1? NC3
Rb1?? Rf3 and h4?? Rf3-->Rh3 and Qh5!
7:41 when an expert goes for free pawns because has no idea to do something else xD
lol
Russia vs Estonia x
♡♡♡
Should I give a dislike for the title of this video? Who said that girl with white pieces didn't take seriously her opponent?
beautiful game, endgame fishy thogh
Clickbait title. Simply a miscalculation by black.
wow
She's playing seriously...it was just a blunder that made her lost the game...
But if she had decided to exchange queens...it is dubious for black to have a good end game...yes slight advantage but i think white can neutralize it..in the end game..
Yes, she should have initiated the queen swap. After black recaptures her queen she can defend the double rook attack on the bishop with the F rook from f3 to f2. Or she could have moved Rf2 in the first place instead of F1
8:49 why rook didn't capture the pawn?
if the black rook recaptured the pawn, the rook just move to f8 and boom, 1 step checkmate
There is still a knight
@@danielcelestial8788 oh, thanks for inform me about my mistake!
And it's c8
sorry i don't know chess. who won lol
@@punkseth1 The girl with the white pieces resigned. The other girl won
Rb1 very bad
Clickbait
Dil kahta hy ly li gi🗼
Not all girls are stupid
All of this just to get a handshake from her🔥🔥
I like woman who play chess well like dordzhieva. She is also beautiful
Besides... If your opponent is female, it makes sense to not take them seriously lol!
11 mins wasted
Chick playing chess cool
Russian had been beaten badly by Estonian.
The way black moved its pieces showed little respect for the game and the opponent. Bad manners.
What do you mean by moving the peices is a good manner or bad manner you are giving bad thinking to others
You should stop saying nonsense. You are very stupide.
LutherBlissett94 Black wasn't rude. What are you saying?
😝😂😂😂
wasting time in flipping the chess piece
Very poor chess in the end
Bad
Womens cannot control emotion
This girl has beauty with daring suit/dress in a chess tournament,,there should have been a dress code in this kind of event,,
Your comment is just dumb a girl can wear whatever she wants so you don't need to tell her what to wear.
There should be a dress code to every chess tournament to avoid being sexually harassed.
You mean that girl need to cover her face too... Get a life
Are you dumb nobody is going to get sexually harassed at a chess tournament think before you make such an idiotic statement