Igal Tadjiev 4 minutes ago (edited) K acknowledged the fact he is repetitive and admitted it to be one of his follies. A man is allowed certain follies as long as he lives in and is the product of the corporeal world. He never claimed to be a god referring to himself as merely "the speaker" in doing so with much restraint from designating himself as an "I." In my humble opinion, K has delivered, by far, one of the greatest services to humanity. Something a fragmented mind is incapable of grasping or comprehending.
his repetition was necessary, it was not a follie. It was just some simple teaching, he despised how people made it look like some grandeur and hard thing
We have many people who are outwardly attractive, but how many people have you been touched by their inward beauty? Next to none. This I feel is one of the greatest challenge in education. To recapture that inner beauty that we lost from being ruthlessly competitive with one another.
Lovely documentary It makes you feel the love and affection that K had for Mother Earth and humanity which was just his state of being, not something gathered or cultivated or earned Blessed to witness his insights and teachings though the work of his foundation 🙏
Such a beautiful man, amazing intellect! I have been reading this man right from my high school days. His words kind of illumine every corner of human soul:)
Finally someone who has understood. You are doubly wise. I used to be depressed when I first found UG. I desperately wanted to be in the natural state. Now I am not bothered. I must remain as myself, as I am, and not entertain any notion of being someone else. Thank you.
He never denied the existence of something sacred,he simply pointed out that if you have preconceive notions about the sacred,you will only see according to you own dilution.so be careful that what you think is so clearly "transcendent", is not just a projection of your own mind.Read "Krishnamurti's Notebook" you will get a much better understanding of his estate of consciousnesses. Have you ever read any of his books? if you have I suggest that you read them again,because you don't get it.
500 years from now ,should humanity survive,people will be open enough to get what K was all about,people are just too infantile and closed-minded today.loved the documentary very well made
I do not have words to describe K ♥️🙏♥️ World Treasure may be justify. Those who want to time travel listen his talks, read his books. It's just you Wake up and get yourself.
Children are so beautifully chanting radhe sita rukmini jai jai....these have come down from ancient indian wisdoms...from our vedas , puranas, upanishads. Jk didn't believe in Gurus (and God) although, He himself is a world teacher ( with a different approach). It's said He loved to listen to classical music as well as chantings . I am confused here,...if JK didn't believe in God and age old indian traditions of temples and religion....why are these children made to chant radha, sita, rukmini?Do they know who radha , sita and rukmini are Or are they simply paying lip service because it's a part of their curriculum??!!...I am new to JK and His philosophies so I am curious to know the logic behind it. I see contradictions Or maybe I am wrong
Observer/Player is first step. You are observer and player together. But when you become observer as a whole observer disappears. Observer can exist only if a player exists. What is observer ? What is player? Player is a human with material and mental attachment with label and experiences. Observer is one have no language , word or anything to be defined. He see things in energy form. So no good or evil. Its all simple energy flow. Life in itself. When you recognize your observer , you have taken next big step. That is called enlightenment. You have the ability to separate your mind from actions that is going on and peace with yourself. Next level is 100% observer and in that observer disappears. ( this state not possible for humans). He either have to die or cease to exist. Only in ghost. A virtual lifeform. Who am i? I am that virtual lifeform.
A year later. Do you still entertain yourself with such a thought? As observer and player are the one. The observer is felt by people all the time, that's why they believe to have an actual existence as a spirit. People believe in lots of stories, the mentioned enlightenment is one of them. You do not have any ability to separate mind from anything, as the mind is everything. At the very moment one realises there is no observer (he realises whole psychological existence of himself is just a thought like all the others) he doesn't die, and he doesn't cease to exist. He won't turn to a ghost, not even virtual one. On the contrary. The body will start speaking the truth, acting the truth, which means destroying the falseness wherever it meets it.
I think you might be able to find some native Indian language talks on-line. I came across some, at some point, I remember. Though K claimed not to have been versed in Sanskrit, I have my doubts. He WAS studied, after all. Though in England.
If somebody wants a perfect world, he definitely doesn't live in a perfect world(which is a thought). So he starts reacting to this thought in a way- I have to fix that, what is broken, and this reaction he materialises in this world. And it is this action(reaction to the thought) only, which slowly keeps destroying this world. If one really realised this, what would happen?
Don`t you get it?! He said: DON'T institutionalize the teaching!!!!!! Why you guys did?! Now that "society" will change his teaching trough the time, to their religion! So authority will be Krishnamurti, and teaching will be that society.. What a dumb people! He asked simple thing, but greed wining all a time...
Sita Patel no, he meant simply do not institutionalize it. Clearly and understandable. Do not express his teaching trough some system, in some building. It just has to be in form of philosophy and everyone come to his own conclusions. Not just preaching someone conclusions, who interpreted in a way they wanted to.
His words were not a philosophy. Any philosophy is a bunch of ideas which you believe to be true. Yet people treated his words that way, that's why he claimed that no one understood what he had to say. They do it still. His words are simple words of an honest man, who speaks to other, who is honest. That's all.
He thought that systems were not the way to know the truth, so building up an education system, as a kind of authority, based on his JK observations might not be accord with Krishnamurti.
Life is sacred and that sacred is god...if you want to call it god and if you don't want to call it god , then there is No god. It is just life/sacred.
Thus far, at least, it's only taken my reading of 26 of his own books, three biographies by others, and about 50 books by such as Arthur Deikman, Charles Tart, Alan Watts, Aldous Huxley, Stephen Batchelor, Gil Fronsdal, Ramana Mahashi, et al, et al, et al, as well as several days in Ojai, to comprehend the =stunning= simplicity of his message: Stop thinking. And start looking, listening, and feeling. Similarly disposed to understanding Siddartha Gautama to the extent currently possible, it's evident to me now that K. came closer to understanding what S.G. understood than anyone in recent times. Grasp =that=, and life becomes ever so much simpler and easier. Unfortunately, this documentary chases the meaningless drama, and misses the point almost entirely.
A brilliant man with charisma, no doubt, yet he wasn't really walking his own talk. Demanding to stand alone and be free he himself was very dependent on donors and a rich life style. Concealing his affair with Rosalind, the wife of his publisher, even demanding several abortions, was a coward and covert, hidden secrecy while he demanded and presented an image totally different, that is to totally honest and authentic. His teachings strike a deep chord, yet are also repetitive and are descriptive and could be lived by very few people. And see how his institutions have done exactly what he despised: the made an idol out of him, and many of his teachings have already become dogma. When he realized on his death bed that he had failed in a way it was a beautiful act of honesty. To despise all traditions is to throw out the baby with the bathing water. While all traditions have an often rigid outer structure he missed that at the same time one can find a living teaching that even is in accord with his central term of choiceness awareness. It looks arrogant to only dismiss without being able to see the lively essence then. 'Traditions means to preserve fire, not ashes.'
You see, sir, a reaction like yours happens when someone listens yet fails to hear. Does it really matter whether you decide to call someone brilliant, full of charisma, or whether you refer to the same man as a liar? No, it doesn't. Those are just your labels for that someone, whom you've never met, never heard, never seen. They are just empty words that you are using to describe the image created in your mind, they are exactly the same words someone else would use to describe e.g. Hitler. All you see is what you read by others on him, all you know is what you believe, think of him. As for the image of Jiddu Krishnamurti you are trying to recreate in this thread, the only man who could ever refer to Krishnamurti, as a man of a zero character, was UG himself and yet, whatever he accused Jiddu of, he had not once attacked his character, his sincerity, his honesty. You say that he failed to walk his talk:). Jiddu's words were his walk, sir. His words did not demand anything of anyone, not to mention to stand alone or to be free. His words were the mere reality of his life- he was not a copy of anyone, therefore free to act freely. He was not dependant on donors, sir. People made donations, which he used the way he did, you are more than welcome to check how the money is used by so called "spiritual teachers" e.g. Mr Tolle, Spira, Mooji, etc. You are free to call someone a coward, covert or whatever word you wish, and if that is everything you've got to say then let be it. Do your words change anything about the honest man, whom Jiddu Krishnamurti, really was? No, they do not. As for his teachings, he didn't have any, it is as simple as that. So whatever you created in your mind and believe it to be true, is only your own responsibility, your own illusion, no one else's. His "institutions" are exactly what would happen if you were to invent computers in the society ignorant of their proper use- they simply wait for the right men to come along- just like the pyramids. Are you one of them? You know the answer yourself. I will repeat again- there are no teachings by Jiddu Krishnamurti, there are just recorded moments of his life. Whoever is interested, will meet him there. He did not realise on his death bed anything that he wouldn't have been aware of beforehand, he knew all along that his dream was dead. As for the rest, tradition is the empty ashes, sir. The fire is the existence itself. You are welcome.
His teaching is very impersonal. He identified himself with the rest of humanity. If you read his books, the prevalent use of "we". I personally find his teaching to be very penetrating, yet starkly simple and rational. He is a teacher in the truest sense of the word for he merely act an intermediary who conveys his understanding of the subject, nothing more. What more can you ask of a teacher? He is thousand times better than those hypocrites that exploit their followers and none of them ever lived up to their claims. Furthermore, he never asked his reader to worship him or behaved like some form of deity. If he behavior was less than perfect, well, he never claimed to be superior to others or more pious than others.
You may be right to some extent, but only to the extent that you have missed the entire point of his lifelong "dialogues." And, you are right he is repetitive and admits it to be one of his follies. A man is allowed certain follies as long as he lives in and is the product of the corporeal world. He never claimed to be a god referring to himself as merely "the speaker" in doing so with much restraint from designating himself as an "I." In my humble opinion, K has delivered, by far, one of the greatest services to humanity. Something a fragmented mind is incapable of grasping or comprehending.
It takes long to understand person like him. I don’t know how much you have invested in understanding him. But it is always true in the history of mankind there are people who will criticise god himself if he comes.
God is not a superstition, he is real and can be experienced, we only have to settle the mind down from it's ripples in consciousness and low and behold there is God as the essence of your own Being.
+Takei Kazushige God is a sublime experience of ever new joy hidden deep within the soul. Jesus said be still and know that I (the Father) am God. Meditate.......
Surprisingly, this place rips of your wallet. Costs rivals that of Western boarding schools, not to mention that the curriculum is not on par with any institution. I know, the teachings methods are different, but the subjects that students are undergoing are nevertheless the same. I don't think J.Krishna agrees with the fee structure. Fee should be low and Philanthropic should be high
Basically a tragic figure, a man who never used a complicated word yet was surrounded by highbrow intellectuals, was dishonest about his sex life. I saw him in Switzerland yes a genuine soul but it felt after listen to his talks there was no meat on the bone, and like all spiritual being there is little help they can give you......
Of particular interest, this awakening and the abjective liminal passage from consciousness to consciousness, said to have occurred at the time of great psychological pain, so did it follow a dissociative experience? Eckhardt Tolle, and of course the Bhudda, speak of transcendences, but the passage has not been made or profoundly experienced by many people it would seem. I wonder if it is a passage into a state of consciousness as man had prior to "domestication" by thought, language, logic?
Of course, what else is left? As it says even in the Tao Te Ching: 'it is to become like the newborn babe'. Not an intellectual challenge, that's for sure.
Maybe he was conditioned by the way he was treated throughout his life. Best clothes, no need to work, no kids, no responsibility apart from trying to explain himself.
His work was teaching. All over the world. Best clothes? They look ordinary. Maybe in new condition, but not extravagant. Maybe he didn't behave in a stereotypically pious way, which are mostly bogus anyway.
Do Jacob's Ladder Now. There is more than enough there to set your brain Totally Free from its past conditioning in less than 90 minutes. Be Open. Be not afraid. There is no reason why you need to waste another day trapped in the Matrix of self-deceptions. After your Enlightenment, come join the rest of us on the front lines. i would love to hear your proposal to move us all on planet Earth from the way things are today to a Whole New Way of Living rooted in Love and Wisdom. Total Enlightenment NOW! facebook.com/groups/1551365565178063/
Igal Tadjiev
4 minutes ago (edited)
K acknowledged the fact he is repetitive and admitted it to be one of his follies. A man is allowed certain follies as long as he lives in and is the product of the corporeal world. He never claimed to be a god referring to himself as merely "the speaker" in doing so with much restraint from designating himself as an "I." In my humble opinion, K has delivered, by far, one of the greatest services to humanity. Something a fragmented mind is incapable of grasping or comprehending.
his repetition was necessary, it was not a follie. It was just some simple teaching, he despised how people made it look like some grandeur and hard thing
Krisnamurti’s pointers changed my life forever. Thank you ♥️
We have many people who are outwardly attractive, but how many people have you been touched by their inward beauty? Next to none. This I feel is one of the greatest challenge in education. To recapture that inner beauty that we lost from being ruthlessly competitive with one another.
Lovely documentary
It makes you feel the love and affection that K had for Mother Earth and humanity which was just his state of being, not something gathered or cultivated or earned
Blessed to witness his insights and teachings though the work of his foundation 🙏
Such a beautiful man, amazing intellect! I have been reading this man right from my high school days. His words kind of illumine every corner of human soul:)
Tonight, I shall go for a long walk in the mountains, the mists are arising..
Finally someone who has understood. You are doubly wise. I used to be depressed when I first found UG. I desperately wanted to be in the natural state. Now I am not bothered. I must remain as myself, as I am, and not entertain any notion of being someone else. Thank you.
UG Krishnamurti and Jiddu Krishnamurti are two different people. This film is about Jiddu Krishnamurti.
He never denied the existence of something sacred,he simply pointed out that if you have preconceive notions about the sacred,you will only see according to you own dilution.so be careful that what you think is so clearly "transcendent", is not just a projection of your own mind.Read "Krishnamurti's Notebook" you will get a much better understanding of his estate of consciousnesses. Have you ever read any of his books? if you have I suggest that you read them again,because you don't get it.
If I read about tying shoe laces, will it tie my shoes? :/
500 years from now ,should humanity survive,people will be open enough to get what K was all about,people are just too infantile and closed-minded today.loved the documentary very well made
May I know why in 500y and not now? What will be different? What will change them?
I don't think so. I can see we are moving backward . Human beings lost their sanity day by day.
I am so impressed by his teachings .... the video is priceless
Nice to see this video. Eventhough I am in brahmakumaris, I like the principles and struggle of Sri Sri krishna Murthy Garu a great philosopher.
I do not have words to describe K ♥️🙏♥️ World Treasure may be justify. Those who want to time travel listen his talks, read his books. It's just you Wake up and get yourself.
You do not have to accept what he is saying . His message is simply as to find the truth yourself.
Is the last word in this video - perfection as in transcript or affection.... Because I hear it as affection.
Thank you. The eternal philosophy.
you forgot to include 'the speaker' in the list of names.
Children are so beautifully chanting radhe sita rukmini jai jai....these have come down from ancient indian wisdoms...from our vedas , puranas, upanishads. Jk didn't believe in Gurus (and God) although, He himself is a world teacher ( with a different approach). It's said He loved to listen to classical music as well as chantings . I am confused here,...if JK didn't believe in God and age old indian traditions of temples and religion....why are these children made to chant radha, sita, rukmini?Do they know who radha , sita and rukmini are Or are they simply paying lip service because it's a part of their curriculum??!!...I am new to JK and His philosophies so I am curious to know the logic behind it. I see contradictions Or maybe I am wrong
It's the beauty of the earth. Not the illusions of one or several men.
Observer/Player is first step. You are observer and player together. But when you become observer as a whole observer disappears. Observer can exist only if a player exists.
What is observer ? What is player?
Player is a human with material and mental attachment with label and experiences.
Observer is one have no language , word or anything to be defined. He see things in energy form. So no good or evil. Its all simple energy flow. Life in itself.
When you recognize your observer , you have taken next big step. That is called enlightenment.
You have the ability to separate your mind from actions that is going on and peace with yourself.
Next level is 100% observer and in that observer disappears. ( this state not possible for humans). He either have to die or cease to exist. Only in ghost. A virtual lifeform.
Who am i?
I am that virtual lifeform.
A year later. Do you still entertain yourself with such a thought? As observer and player are the one. The observer is felt by people all the time, that's why they believe to have an actual existence as a spirit. People believe in lots of stories, the mentioned enlightenment is one of them. You do not have any ability to separate mind from anything, as the mind is everything. At the very moment one realises there is no observer (he realises whole psychological existence of himself is just a thought like all the others) he doesn't die, and he doesn't cease to exist. He won't turn to a ghost, not even virtual one. On the contrary. The body will start speaking the truth, acting the truth, which means destroying the falseness wherever it meets it.
@@slavomirakrasna2111 on wich way body speaks the truth?
I never heard Him speaking Hindi. Nevertheless He enriched my life. Truth is a free path and not an Institution
I think you might be able to find some native Indian language talks on-line. I came across some, at some point, I remember. Though K claimed not to have been versed in Sanskrit, I have my doubts. He WAS studied, after all. Though in England.
It's the landscapes, scenes, ordinary people that attracts me. Not J. Krishnamurti.
is this india music i like this music?
archie977 yes
Sitar instrument music
We want a perfect world, so we must look for life in a perfect world
If somebody wants a perfect world, he definitely doesn't live in a perfect world(which is a thought). So he starts reacting to this thought in a way- I have to fix that, what is broken, and this reaction he materialises in this world. And it is this action(reaction to the thought) only, which slowly keeps destroying this world. If one really realised this, what would happen?
Outstanding video, thanks for sharing.
Don`t you get it?! He said:
DON'T institutionalize the teaching!!!!!!
Why you guys did?!
Now that "society" will change his teaching trough the time, to their religion!
So authority will be Krishnamurti, and teaching will be that society..
What a dumb people! He asked simple thing, but greed wining all a time...
If is meant to disseminate knowledge. That is what the so called society is doing.
Sita Patel no, he meant simply do not institutionalize it. Clearly and understandable. Do not express his teaching trough some system, in some building. It just has to be in form of philosophy and everyone come to his own conclusions. Not just preaching someone conclusions, who interpreted in a way they wanted to.
+PartOfYou Jiddu himself turned it into an institution. LITERALLY.
+PartOfYou The thing is to listen to the teachings and as he said, go into it yourself and find out the truth of it for yourself.
His words were not a philosophy. Any philosophy is a bunch of ideas which you believe to be true. Yet people treated his words that way, that's why he claimed that no one understood what he had to say. They do it still. His words are simple words of an honest man, who speaks to other, who is honest. That's all.
Absolutely beautiful....his PRESENCE ....his essence.....his energy field remains.......
excellent
The Blue God Jiddu Krishnamurti.
Hare Krishna
@32:04 False - Krishnamurti schools are expensive only the rich can afford and Elites are admitted. Although his teachings are for all.
He thought that systems were not the way to know the truth, so building up an education system, as a kind of authority, based on his JK observations might not be accord with Krishnamurti.
Life is sacred and that sacred is god...if you want to call it god and if you don't want to call it god , then there is No god. It is just life/sacred.
What about death?
man dont need religion ... man dont need a god.
So you are atheist . Theism and atheism are not good . Good to be impartial .
No God, no Planet, you will be just another floating entity in the infinite space !!
A comb over and nebulous and flowery words?
thanks for putting this up
Very good, keep the flame alive!!!
Thanks friend.
Love all Serve all.
LOVE
Thus far, at least, it's only taken my reading of 26 of his own books, three biographies by others, and about 50 books by such as Arthur Deikman, Charles Tart, Alan Watts, Aldous Huxley, Stephen Batchelor, Gil Fronsdal, Ramana Mahashi, et al, et al, et al, as well as several days in Ojai, to comprehend the =stunning= simplicity of his message: Stop thinking. And start looking, listening, and feeling.
Similarly disposed to understanding Siddartha Gautama to the extent currently possible, it's evident to me now that K. came closer to understanding what S.G. understood than anyone in recent times. Grasp =that=, and life becomes ever so much simpler and easier.
Unfortunately, this documentary chases the meaningless drama, and misses the point almost entirely.
what about u.g krishnamurthi
After all that, you got a message to stop thinking? I'm speechless, thank you.
सद सद नमन
A brilliant man with charisma, no doubt, yet he wasn't really walking his own talk. Demanding to stand alone and be free he himself was very dependent on donors and a rich life style. Concealing his affair with Rosalind, the wife of his publisher, even demanding several abortions, was a coward and covert, hidden secrecy while he demanded and presented an image totally different, that is to totally honest and authentic. His teachings strike a deep chord, yet are also repetitive and are descriptive and could be lived by very few people. And see how his institutions have done exactly what he despised: the made an idol out of him, and many of his teachings have already become dogma. When he realized on his death bed that he had failed in a way it was a beautiful act of honesty. To despise all traditions is to throw out the baby with the bathing water. While all traditions have an often rigid outer structure he missed that at the same time one can find a living teaching that even is in accord with his central term of choiceness awareness. It looks arrogant to only dismiss without being able to see the lively essence then. 'Traditions means to preserve fire, not ashes.'
You see, sir, a reaction like yours happens when someone listens yet fails to hear. Does it really matter whether you decide to call someone brilliant, full of charisma, or whether you refer to the same man as a liar? No, it doesn't. Those are just your labels for that someone, whom you've never met, never heard, never seen. They are just empty words that you are using to describe the image created in your mind, they are exactly the same words someone else would use to describe e.g. Hitler. All you see is what you read by others on him, all you know is what you believe, think of him. As for the image of Jiddu Krishnamurti you are trying to recreate in this thread, the only man who could ever refer to Krishnamurti, as a man of a zero character, was UG himself and yet, whatever he accused Jiddu of, he had not once attacked his character, his sincerity, his honesty. You say that he failed to walk his talk:). Jiddu's words were his walk, sir. His words did not demand anything of anyone, not to mention to stand alone or to be free. His words were the mere reality of his life- he was not a copy of anyone, therefore free to act freely. He was not dependant on donors, sir. People made donations, which he used the way he did, you are more than welcome to check how the money is used by so called "spiritual teachers" e.g. Mr Tolle, Spira, Mooji, etc. You are free to call someone a coward, covert or whatever word you wish, and if that is everything you've got to say then let be it. Do your words change anything about the honest man, whom Jiddu Krishnamurti, really was? No, they do not. As for his teachings, he didn't have any, it is as simple as that. So whatever you created in your mind and believe it to be true, is only your own responsibility, your own illusion, no one else's. His "institutions" are exactly what would happen if you were to invent computers in the society ignorant of their proper use- they simply wait for the right men to come along- just like the pyramids. Are you one of them? You know the answer yourself. I will repeat again- there are no teachings by Jiddu Krishnamurti, there are just recorded moments of his life. Whoever is interested, will meet him there. He did not realise on his death bed anything that he wouldn't have been aware of beforehand, he knew all along that his dream was dead. As for the rest, tradition is the empty ashes, sir. The fire is the existence itself. You are welcome.
His teaching is very impersonal. He identified himself with the rest of humanity. If you read his books, the prevalent use of "we". I personally find his teaching to be very penetrating, yet starkly simple and rational. He is a teacher in the truest sense of the word for he merely act an intermediary who conveys his understanding of the subject, nothing more. What more can you ask of a teacher? He is thousand times better than those hypocrites that exploit their followers and none of them ever lived up to their claims. Furthermore, he never asked his reader to worship him or behaved like some form of deity. If he behavior was less than perfect, well, he never claimed to be superior to others or more pious than others.
You may be right to some extent, but only to the extent that you have missed the entire point of his lifelong "dialogues." And, you are right he is repetitive and admits it to be one of his follies. A man is allowed certain follies as long as he lives in and is the product of the corporeal world. He never claimed to be a god referring to himself as merely "the speaker" in doing so with much restraint from designating himself as an "I." In my humble opinion, K has delivered, by far, one of the greatest services to humanity. Something a fragmented mind is incapable of grasping or comprehending.
It takes long to understand person like him. I don’t know how much you have invested in understanding him. But it is always true in the history of mankind there are people who will criticise god himself if he comes.
What you have uttered about Krishnaji amounts to sacrilage. I beg of him to forgive you. I dont want to add anything more.
God is not a superstition, he is real and can be experienced, we only have to settle the mind down from it's ripples in consciousness and low and behold there is God as the essence of your own Being.
+William G What a load of horse shit.
Prove it
+Takei Kazushige YOU, can only prove God to yourself, sorry Charlie.
William G i could be hallucinating
+Takei Kazushige God is a sublime experience of ever new joy hidden deep within the soul. Jesus said be still and know that I (the Father) am God. Meditate.......
how at 42:10 student got there uphill
Surprisingly, this place rips of your wallet. Costs rivals that of Western boarding schools, not to mention that the curriculum is not on par with any institution. I know, the teachings methods are different, but the subjects that students are undergoing are nevertheless the same. I don't think J.Krishna agrees with the fee structure. Fee should be low and Philanthropic should be high
Why do we Indians always crave for freebies, fake socialism.
Why shouldn't we pay if we can
Is it true he had an affair w his friens wife and she, pregnant several times had abortions?
Jk is reflecting one God one family one world
Basically a tragic figure, a man who never used a complicated word yet was surrounded by highbrow intellectuals, was dishonest about his sex life. I saw him in Switzerland yes a genuine soul but it felt after listen to his talks there was no meat on the bone, and like all spiritual being there is little help they can give you......
My God...I am not too late....
How old are you?
Of particular interest, this awakening and the abjective liminal passage from consciousness to consciousness, said to have occurred at the time of great psychological pain, so did it follow a dissociative experience? Eckhardt Tolle, and of course the Bhudda, speak of transcendences, but the passage has not been made or profoundly experienced by many people it would seem. I wonder if it is a passage into a state of consciousness as man had prior to "domestication" by thought, language, logic?
Of course, what else is left? As it says even in the Tao Te Ching: 'it is to become like the newborn babe'. Not an intellectual challenge, that's for sure.
What are all the books for?
The antidote to JK and to UG is YOU! Don't buy second-hand thoughts.
He was a good devil who did his best to help the world on fire with the water of his powerful vision and thinking. It came from the soul.
Maybe he was conditioned by the way he was treated throughout his life. Best clothes, no need to work, no kids, no responsibility apart from trying to explain himself.
His work was teaching. All over the world. Best clothes? They look ordinary. Maybe in new condition, but not extravagant. Maybe he didn't behave in a stereotypically pious way, which are mostly bogus anyway.
Maybe he was conditioned by being taken away from his family as a child by the crazy theosophical cult and being raised to be some kind of messiah
Jiddu was atheistic , that is separatism . Good to be impartial : no theist no atheist etcetera . Non-separatism .
I am the new worldteacher . Year 2019 A.D. .
@@alainmaitre2069 Teach us, master
seem to me that she doesnt understand krisnamurti
In what way ? shouldn't you make an attempt to uncover that ?
All politicians are. Don't buy and sell their yakshit.
хотя-бы русские субтитры
The antidote to J Krishnamurti is UG Krishnamurti. I caution you, it is a very powerful and bitter antidote.
Myeah let's cash in on your last name and be a second class ripoff
Who is brave enough to destroy K. ?
K failed. Now it is up to each and every one of us, without exception.
Failed at what exactly? Is it up to you to finish his life?:/ No, it is not, he did it by himself. You take care of yours.
K failed to set anyone Totally Free.
Now it is our turn. What will we do?
Do Jacob's Ladder Now. There is more than enough there to set your brain Totally Free from its past conditioning in less than 90 minutes.
Be Open. Be not afraid.
There is no reason why you need to waste another day trapped in the Matrix of self-deceptions.
After your Enlightenment, come join the rest of us on the front lines. i would love to hear your proposal to move us all on planet Earth from the way things are today to a Whole New Way of Living rooted in Love and Wisdom.
Total Enlightenment NOW! facebook.com/groups/1551365565178063/
that wasn't up to him. you missed the point.