Bernard Stiegler & Posthumanist Post-Marxism (ft. Diego Ruzzarin)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @juanperezvilla1686
    @juanperezvilla1686 Рік тому +12

    thanks Diego for recommending this channel

  • @samuelfarach
    @samuelfarach Рік тому +3

    Diego talked about this channel in another podcast, but I had no idea he participated in it. I was surprised when I recognized his voice.

  • @edthoreum7625
    @edthoreum7625 Рік тому +1

    26:20 books/glossary
    8:00 Marx & $tockS,,,
    8:25 🎯
    18:00 pure (metaphys.) vs. political (preexisting functional society?) Economies
    29:30 pharmaCom,DERRIDA
    35:00 pansymbolic dialectic

    • @DanielOrtaM
      @DanielOrtaM Рік тому

      This comment should be pinned. Thanks!

  • @glassmuncher2555
    @glassmuncher2555 Рік тому

    the whole discussion of discretization reminds me of McLuhan. Discretizing as a tendency - a pathology - of typographic man. The clock being an example of this for both McLuhan and Stiegler. Diegos thoughts at 34:34 immediately brought to mind McLuhan's rephrasing of Churchill: “We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us”.

  • @moumouzel
    @moumouzel Рік тому +6

    what the world needs is Postpostism

  • @kotfall
    @kotfall Рік тому +1

    Tqm dieguito Ruzzarin 🙌

  • @codycurtin2295
    @codycurtin2295 2 місяці тому

    Stiegler the reason im doing a masters in media studies.

  • @silverline9161
    @silverline9161 Рік тому +7

    based and ruzzarinpilled

  • @bernatsanroma4037
    @bernatsanroma4037 Рік тому +6

    An episode dedicated to lacan with Diego invited would be useful to take Lacan, or the Real Freud to english lenguage. Because terms as mind, concious, or others engaged in the construction of desire systems are tendentious to misunderstand the german and french signifiers: when Freud meant properly soul, english standarized translation downloads or neglects the intension of 'soul' to 'mind', making posible some unconsciuos exchange of mind upto idealist ego cogitans. And that kind of lacks of the proper definition of the Real in the subject is common in the first approaches to psicoanálisis. Even more if you start with It as a mean to avoid the study of history of philosophy.

    • @theonetruetim
      @theonetruetim Рік тому +1

      New word for me!!! tendentious: expressing or intending to promote a particular cause or point of view, especially a controversial one.
      ; Thank you!! I love it!

    • @afbf6522
      @afbf6522 Рік тому

      Malgrat no entendre't gaire, estic d'acord!

  • @Lecj_18
    @Lecj_18 Рік тому +4

    Amazing

  • @maxcano2063
    @maxcano2063 Рік тому

    Incluos aquí, Diego no se puede resistir a hablar de lo que le obsesiona

  • @markkuykendall5475
    @markkuykendall5475 Рік тому

    Marx would be massively into blockchain socialism and using crypto to build regen communities. He'd hold Ethereum, mostly

  • @markkuykendall5475
    @markkuykendall5475 Рік тому

    Thoth has an ibis head.

  • @landotter
    @landotter Рік тому +1

    Speak on obscurantism, someday?

  • @ralycortez
    @ralycortez Рік тому +2

    🔥🔥🔥

  • @dirtCommie
    @dirtCommie Рік тому

    Ready for the pump ⛽ and dump coin 🪙

  • @Cooper-eg3bv
    @Cooper-eg3bv Рік тому +2

    Ruzzapill

  • @TylerRein
    @TylerRein Рік тому +2

    These conversations always seem so pretentious, but that’s theory for ya haha! So much of theory strikes me as “that’s cool, but that could of been said much simpler.” So much of the obfuscation can be attributed to the labyrinthian language and technical terminology used to explain (often) fairly straightforward ideas.
    I still love it though! Great pod guys! 🙏

    • @ManyDog
      @ManyDog Рік тому

      Anyone who think reading a book on philosophy and discussing it is pretentious has a disgusting way of looking at the world

    • @botvinny608
      @botvinny608 Рік тому

      way to answer with a pretentious comment lmao @@ManyDog

    • @ManyDog
      @ManyDog Рік тому

      what is wrong with pretentiousness?@@botvinny608

  • @edgelordcutting
    @edgelordcutting Рік тому

    ahh yes I'm home, this is quite a dank corner of the internet

  • @theonetruetim
    @theonetruetim Рік тому +5

    1."Biopolitical", whoa.
    2. Stimulus checks, direct money, just like in Pandemic=were issued in 2001.
    3 Feb 8th- MY Bday- GOOGLE lost 100 B$ in Security Valuation. Efficient market hypothesis- in it's 3 flavors- are kinda interesting to me...
    4 The term "Proletariat" is like "Birthing Person".; gross. Reductive.
    5. Anticipation/tertiary/capacity= Human Mind Prestructures experience; KANT already nailed that, yo. The whole "prestructures" (comes before) was in one of those "Critiques on" books. Kant was the best.
    6. Our relationship w/ time; past-self, present, future..... fun stuff!
    7. Freud's nephew; WOW!! This is new to me. wowwowwow. Sounds pretty tight. Here's a link to learn more. I love the evolution of consumer "appetites"...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays homeboy sounds SMMMaaart!! af
    You know this guy? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Loewy another human nature sussing powerhouse. Raymond Loewy.
    8 LOVE me some Savoir-faire
    9 The....oikos conundrum- WE ARE RAPIDLY APPROACHING-where production/automation advances to perfection(Skynet, Terminators, etc) may require some....central....planning? Society will have to start shopping IDEAS. Or, ask GPT to solve it, or...something. WE ACTUALLY HAVE AN AWESOME OPPORTUNITY BEFORE US.
    10. "It's the economy, stupid"
    Diego is so cool. Eric is so smart. Love his process. Pills; you was quiet, but I felt your presence. Victor; you was like a Beatnik chillin in the shadows. Loved gettin to hear another good conversation from The Pill Pod squad/gang. Felt like I was there.
    Good times
    Top Notch-
    be easy, my friends,
    T-

  • @TylerRein
    @TylerRein Рік тому +10

    These conversations always seem so pretentious, but that’s theory for ya haha! So much of theory strikes me as “that’s cool, but that could of been said much simpler.” So much of the obfuscation can be attributed to the labyrinthian language and technical terminology used to explain (often) fairly straightforward ideas.
    I still love it though! Great pod guys! 🙏

    • @viq777
      @viq777 Рік тому +1

      Kind of my complaint with a lot of the people we have been reading lately. But I got tired of saying the same thing each pod, so decided to just do my best to engage on its terms and defer to my more knowledgable co-hosts (at least on this topic).

    • @ManyDog
      @ManyDog Рік тому

      You don't know what pretentious means if you think reading a book is that.

    • @Smerpyderp
      @Smerpyderp Рік тому

      It’s funny you use the word “labrinthinian” to critique the usage of similarly labrinthinian language lol