Physics Professor watches "the goop lab" - Sixty Symbols

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лют 2020
  • Professor Philip Moriarty watched episode 5 of the goop lab, which focuses on energy.
    More links and info below ↓ ↓ ↓
    the goop lab on Netflix: www.netflix.com/title/80244690
    More videos with Phil: bit.ly/Prof_Moriarty
    Phil is a physics professor at The University of Nottingham: www.nottingham.ac.uk/physics/...
    He wrote a blog about the goop lab --- muircheartblog.wordpress.com/...
    Visit our website at www.sixtysymbols.com/
    We're on Facebook at / sixtysymbols
    And Twitter at / sixtysymbols
    This project features scientists from The University of Nottingham
    bit.ly/NottsPhysics
    Patreon: / sixtysymbols
    Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran
    www.bradyharanblog.com
    Email list: eepurl.com/YdjL9
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,5 тис.

  • @death0intj
    @death0intj 4 роки тому +6115

    this is painful to watch, torturing physicists like that should be illegal.

    • @A-Ls1
      @A-Ls1 4 роки тому +44

      death0intj It’s kinda funny lol because I would react the same way.

    • @death0intj
      @death0intj 4 роки тому +38

      @Siahj The Sleepy Sorcerer now imagine being in small room, with delicate machinery around, where you can't walk off the cringe :)

    • @pharmdiddy5120
      @pharmdiddy5120 4 роки тому +13

      and physicians

    • @eagle3676
      @eagle3676 4 роки тому +2

      @@A-Ls1 I was reacting the same way

    • @Damstraight68
      @Damstraight68 4 роки тому +16

      10:16 The dude shows his evil here. And the professor responds in the correct manner. Cringe. Just as if someone was insuinuating he was going to poke someone in their, well... ita obvious. Ew btw.

  • @francoislacombe9071
    @francoislacombe9071 4 роки тому +4635

    Have you noticed that you can replace the word "energy" with the word "magic" in that goop lab video and it changes absolutely nothing to its meaning?

    • @hulldragon
      @hulldragon 4 роки тому +268

      Absolutely, right! Those fuckers are just as much charlatans as snake oil salespeople, faith healers and psychics. Just taking money from the gullible and ignorant.

    • @sabouma
      @sabouma 4 роки тому +87

      @@hulldragon it actually makes me sad that they got enough money from those types of people to make this show

    • @satyampandey2222
      @satyampandey2222 4 роки тому +57

      "energy" to them is VERY different than to people in science. They chuck that word in every "thoery" they have for anything

    • @markphc99
      @markphc99 4 роки тому +47

      The word force is abused by these frauds almost as much as energy

    • @pcuimac
      @pcuimac 4 роки тому +60

      exchange "energy" with scam and it begins to make sense.

  • @jasmadams
    @jasmadams 4 роки тому +2653

    "A lot of very attractive people doing very attractive things," said the stunningly handsome scientist.

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 4 роки тому +16

      lol

    • @ritanightingale250
      @ritanightingale250 4 роки тому +14

      James Adams I could not agree more!!

    • @CinderTheFox
      @CinderTheFox 4 роки тому

      M;H of course, cause Gordon doesn’t talk.

    • @ankavoskuilen1725
      @ankavoskuilen1725 4 роки тому +1

      Bit insecure about the hair though.

    • @NaumRusomarov
      @NaumRusomarov 3 роки тому +27

      @@ankavoskuilen1725 His personality and generally healthy looks more than more add up for the lack of hair. Phil really is a character. :D

  • @SarasHotandDangerous
    @SarasHotandDangerous 4 роки тому +562

    This should be titled “physicist looses his mind for 21 minutes”. Idk who these guys are but I’m glad they did this

    • @OrentholJames
      @OrentholJames 3 роки тому +7

      Loses*

    • @BenjaminGoose
      @BenjaminGoose 2 роки тому

      Tightens*

    • @VivekYadav-ds8oz
      @VivekYadav-ds8oz Рік тому +3

      These are the people that have brought you channels like Numberphile and Computerphile.

    • @redbandet
      @redbandet 9 місяців тому +1

      Tis a brilliant channel from the professors of Nottingham university

  • @EduIreland
    @EduIreland 4 роки тому +1945

    Disclaimer... A scientist has been severely harmed in this video 🤣

  • @ultimateman55
    @ultimateman55 4 роки тому +1672

    Brady deserves an Oscar for his role as Devil's Advocate here.

    • @karlboud88
      @karlboud88 4 роки тому +48

      Yeah at times in the video I was questioning Brady's stance on the whole voodo magic

    • @uselessgarbagehandler
      @uselessgarbagehandler 4 роки тому +48

      The dynamic between them both is hilarious

    • @jamarante88
      @jamarante88 4 роки тому +22

      That was a fantastic interview actually!

    • @JorgeFalconOnline
      @JorgeFalconOnline 4 роки тому +27

      He had more patience with Brady's comments than I could possibly have 🤣

    • @blackhatguy6955
      @blackhatguy6955 4 роки тому +2

      And a Golden Raspberry for his idiotically hyperactive camera work.

  • @jones1351
    @jones1351 4 роки тому +466

    "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" -- Voltaire
    Therein may lie the danger.

    • @dewdop
      @dewdop 3 роки тому +17

      Trump

    • @Ryder-wt9tk
      @Ryder-wt9tk 3 роки тому +19

      Reminds me of (insert political figure I dislike).

    • @vinigretzky97
      @vinigretzky97 3 роки тому +1

      Why the Corona nonsense will become very dangerous in a nutshell.

    • @dewdop
      @dewdop 3 роки тому +3

      @Gus Erland trump fits the quote.

    • @Pandora234able
      @Pandora234able 3 роки тому +1

      @@dewdop 98% of modern politicians some are just not as overt as say others are

  • @Adam-ui3yn
    @Adam-ui3yn 3 роки тому +474

    Being a STEM student I've found if I can combine enough scientific jargon and present it with enough confidence, I can get the layman to believe nearly anything I say. However if another scientifically literate person was present they'd know immediately I was spewing bs.

    • @richardtickler8555
      @richardtickler8555 3 роки тому +75

      43% of people believe anything when you put a number and a % in the mix

    • @johnarken1810
      @johnarken1810 3 роки тому +56

      @@richardtickler8555 that only works 69% of the time. 42% of everyone knows that.

    • @Nellinator23
      @Nellinator23 3 роки тому +1

      Ain't this the truth

    • @Slangarangg
      @Slangarangg 3 роки тому +18

      @@richardtickler8555 60% of the time, it works every time.

    • @oldcowbb
      @oldcowbb 3 роки тому +5

      sad truth, sometime even high school level scientific jargon is enough to fool people who are supposed to know high school level stuff

  • @joshwent
    @joshwent 4 роки тому +2132

    I'm really impressed with Brady's 'devil's advocate' act. He actually makes some solid arguments, not promoting this specific nonsense, but in terms of questioning the methodology of ascertaining truth itself.
    It turns this from "Phil aggressively mocks a BS peddler", to "Phil exclaims the importance of the Scientific Method".

    • @anetola
      @anetola 4 роки тому +27

      exactly!

    • @StickyDiceOfficial
      @StickyDiceOfficial 4 роки тому +30

      I was incredibly impressed as well

    • @danielnikolov3406
      @danielnikolov3406 4 роки тому +44

      was super impressed! and all these points are extremely useful in terms of having a philosophical/spiritual discussion but as many people including Phil pointed out, it's problematic when it's framed as scientific consensus or even bearing scientific characteristics

    • @charcolew
      @charcolew 4 роки тому +24

      I found it distinctly unimpressive - as well as highly annoying. It was basically just a phenomenological hammer to the forehead, saying "But how do you know you know?"

    • @timgrove3927
      @timgrove3927 4 роки тому +96

      @@charcolew It's important to present a rebuttal like this in order to encourage a scientist to explain something complex in a tactful way. The goal is to inform people who might be less rational than a scientist in a way that doesn't consider them less intelligent. The path to a rational future is not only paved by exceptional education, it's paved by exceptional communication too.

  • @myleswillis
    @myleswillis 4 роки тому +1094

    It does work. He was making professor Moriarty flinch and wrench his whole body just by using his asshat words. 😂

    • @ultimateman55
      @ultimateman55 4 роки тому +4

      Your real name is Biff.

    • @ThaSandwitch
      @ThaSandwitch 4 роки тому +6

      Now Sherlock knows his weakness

    • @saymon4751
      @saymon4751 3 роки тому +4

      His whole energetic field just changed very fast lol

  • @hareecionelson5875
    @hareecionelson5875 4 роки тому +147

    "The body is multi-dimensional"
    Me: *looks at my 3-space Dimensional hand existing in 1 time-dimension*
    "Well... wha'd'ya know? He's not wrong" :I

    • @JF-bc2lw
      @JF-bc2lw 2 роки тому

      I thought the same thing lol

  • @danwest9900
    @danwest9900 3 роки тому +98

    I really like how the camera-guy keeps challenging the narrator by asking all the questions and playing devil's advocate. It makes the narrator have to clearly explain all of his logic and keep on his toes.

  • @Chlorate299
    @Chlorate299 4 роки тому +717

    Brady, that was really quite a cruel thing to do to Professor Moriarty.

    • @ERBarratt
      @ERBarratt 4 роки тому +47

      Well, he did worse to Sherlock.

    • @CPSPD
      @CPSPD 4 роки тому +4

      calling philip moriarty professor moriarty is more cruel! haha

    • @jeremys7882
      @jeremys7882 4 роки тому +7

      Lol, it did look like it was physically hurting him to listen to it at parts.

    • @raykent3211
      @raykent3211 4 роки тому +1

      Moriarty deserves to get taken down a peg or two.

    • @MarcCoteMusic
      @MarcCoteMusic 4 роки тому +7

      @@raykent3211 - Why?

  • @majuss06
    @majuss06 4 роки тому +772

    Watching professor Moriarty trying not to explode is worth every second. Apart from that I think he is a lot more reasonable than that goopy nonsense deserves.

    • @elkudos6262
      @elkudos6262 4 роки тому +4

      Oh, come now, one can't be too reasonable.

    • @DrSpooglemon
      @DrSpooglemon 4 роки тому +6

      Angry science rants are indeed awesome..

    • @AngDavies
      @AngDavies 4 роки тому +15

      @Sandcastle • true, but he has got a point about scientists sometimes getting far to much traction/media attention for their personal unsubstantiated ideas due to their accomplishments in the field.
      You can trace a lot of the vitamin c woo right back to Linus Pauling and his weird personal obsession with it for instance-curing cancer/the common cold etc

    • @MrDizzle715
      @MrDizzle715 4 роки тому

      Just shows Hollyweird is so out of touch.

    • @QualityDoggo
      @QualityDoggo 4 роки тому

      The moment they said subatomic or double slit experiment lol

  • @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475
    @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 3 роки тому +99

    Physicist: "I'm trying to be fair"
    Goopy Powtrow:
    "I had an exorcism"
    😂🙃

    • @lawrencecalablaster568
      @lawrencecalablaster568 Рік тому +1

      I mean, don’t call that ridiculous, that’s a real thing.

    • @Baddaby
      @Baddaby 9 місяців тому +9

      @@lawrencecalablaster568 ah yes for sure. Demons are pretty real and scientific

  • @fhpurcell7713
    @fhpurcell7713 4 роки тому +65

    Love the deliberately “stubborn” guy in the background. The scientific community often positions itself as clearly in the right and while I know that most of the time when debunking this type of stuff we are, it can never hurt to make sure we’re not being hypocritical and be exactly as scrutinising about ourselves as we are about them.

  • @stumccabe
    @stumccabe 4 роки тому +795

    "The body is multidimensional" - true, three dimensions.

    • @grenangle
      @grenangle 4 роки тому +85

      Stu McCabe Unfortunately my body is also travelling the fourth dimension too.

    • @hansnoor9637
      @hansnoor9637 4 роки тому +5

      @@grenangle Do you have watched Interstellar too much?

    • @grenangle
      @grenangle 4 роки тому +82

      Hans Noor who has the time?

    • @roberto8650
      @roberto8650 4 роки тому +23

      @@grenangle I see what you did there.

    • @nunliski
      @nunliski 4 роки тому +5

      @@grenangle We Tralfamadorians experience all points in time simultaneously.

  • @user-zz8ln3uh5x
    @user-zz8ln3uh5x 4 роки тому +585

    If a medical doctor said “I have this hypothesis” and began treating all their patients without any evidence of the treatment’s actual efficacy, I’m pretty sure they’d have their license revoked.

    • @partynhouse
      @partynhouse 4 роки тому +30

      And probably do some jail time because of malpractice and endangering patient lives. But hey, in this crazy world we can expect that this will not happen to Paltrow.

    • @Hysteria98
      @Hysteria98 4 роки тому +22

      1 guy with a pseudo PhD wrote a book on how vaccines cause autism and published it on Amazon. Look at the world now- as if having a verifiable doctorate matters; it's what the people believe, not what all other professionals think.

    • @partynhouse
      @partynhouse 4 роки тому +13

      @@Hysteria98 I think that guy had a real phd but published that nonsense, lost his phd because of that and now he is still preaching that dangerous hypothesis, I am not sure. Anyway it just proves how gullible people can be.

    • @realspacemodels
      @realspacemodels 4 роки тому +4

      But that's why there are clinical trials. To take a hypothesis and show its efficacy. The trials are done with controls and placebos to see if the results are being influenced by the experimenter or the subject. Prof. Moriarty is saying that's the standard that should be held to the guy at Goop.

    • @johnny_eth
      @johnny_eth 4 роки тому +1

      If they would be just waiving their hands in the air, well, then would be not that much harm but to steal money from gullible patients.

  • @KarlMySuitcase
    @KarlMySuitcase 4 роки тому +159

    I had to watch "fake martial artists get owned" compilations to cleanse the quantum field toxins out of my sub atoms after watching this.

    • @laquerisma
      @laquerisma 3 роки тому +9

      I just threw mine in the dishwasher with some Finish Quantum.

    • @peterharris9022
      @peterharris9022 3 роки тому +2

      Damn my sub atomic paricles have left me glued to my couch

  • @saramulry
    @saramulry 3 роки тому +59

    I really really appreciate this video. I’m a bodyworker, and dudes like on that goop ridiculousness make it so I’m constantly having to re-educate clients on what REALLY happens in a session. Any emotional releases & a majority of “unwinding” occurs as a result of giving the client the time and space to feel comfortable, and reassurance that there is no judgement in their processing of emotions or trauma. That’s not changing their subatomic particles, it’s therapy.
    AND-they’re all in the room on tables at the same time in front of cameras(and expectations) with his loud and cueing sounds. That’s called group-think.

    • @Pho7on
      @Pho7on 9 місяців тому +2

      Dang, with two sentences you changed my opinion entirely of that work. Yeah, if someone gave me the space and suggestion to get all goofy with my body, it would feel kind of freeing and therapeutic. No woo necessary.

  • @Nf6xNet
    @Nf6xNet 4 роки тому +1112

    I am thoroughly impressed with Dr. Moriarty's open-mindedness and professionalism as displayed here. He made it all the way to @13:35 before resorting to the word "bollocks"!

    • @MrPabgon
      @MrPabgon 4 роки тому +4

      @@fugreek reasonably tho xD

    • @trdi
      @trdi 4 роки тому +4

      Open-mindedness is the last thing I would associate with him.

    • @Ektalon
      @Ektalon 4 роки тому +4

      Dude, spoilers!

    • @Jixejo
      @Jixejo 4 роки тому

      i've never heard him say that before xD

    • @photonicpizza1466
      @photonicpizza1466 4 роки тому +5

      If only he had resisted for two seconds longer.

  • @qaz123123qwe
    @qaz123123qwe 4 роки тому +597

    "The man is talking out of his nether regions" - loved this

    • @carlosgaspar8447
      @carlosgaspar8447 4 роки тому +12

      he was talking about the frequency of urination.

    • @joshuagarrett4879
      @joshuagarrett4879 4 роки тому +3

      That is exactly the moment I decided to up vote the video.

    • @marctelfer6159
      @marctelfer6159 4 роки тому +4

      I was not expecting to hear "that's bollocks". I mean, it definitely is, but I wasn't expect him to say it in so few words :P

    • @gwyn.
      @gwyn. 4 роки тому +1

      I'm gonna borrow this whenever I want to say BS

  • @arnav257
    @arnav257 4 роки тому +299

    "I don't want to come across as the informed scientist ridiculing everything..."
    10 minutes later:
    "This is just nonsense. This is really just nonsense."
    "That man is talking out of his nether regions."
    xD

    • @hindigente
      @hindigente 3 роки тому +5

      Well, he didn't ridicule "every thing", just one.

    • @lambda653
      @lambda653 3 роки тому +7

      He couldn't deal with the shear pretentiousness

    • @tropingreenhorn
      @tropingreenhorn 3 роки тому +2

      he didn't say he wouldn't ridicule it, he just said he didn't want to come across a certain way

    • @DrorF
      @DrorF 3 роки тому

      Well, think how he would've reacted if he _didn't_ care about that

  • @warwasnotinvited
    @warwasnotinvited 4 роки тому +253

    more like influencing the potential energy of naive people's wallets

  • @TheValueOfN
    @TheValueOfN 4 роки тому +1591

    This is the perfect video to send to my 18 year old daughter who has just recommended the Goop series to me.

    • @neothepenguin1257
      @neothepenguin1257 4 роки тому +31

      Hope that went well

    • @carcinogenicthalidomide3057
      @carcinogenicthalidomide3057 4 роки тому +25

      Wtf?why is your daughter watching goop

    • @mustafam3285
      @mustafam3285 4 роки тому +109

      It’s never too late to put your children up for adoption!

    • @mustafam3285
      @mustafam3285 4 роки тому +20

      Benjamin McCann To be fair, it isn’t anything intelligent women are watching either.

    • @Lolwutdesu9000
      @Lolwutdesu9000 4 роки тому +21

      Time to have a serious discussion with your daughter.

  • @CraftyF0X
    @CraftyF0X 4 роки тому +680

    Brady tried to pump that blood pressure through the roof in this one, I mean he used all the bad "sicence skeptic" argument in the book. He was doing a great job as the ignorant's advocate :)

    • @nate_d376
      @nate_d376 4 роки тому +32

      A "Devil's advocate" perhaps?
      And I could sense the high blood pressure through my screen, like a thermometer...lol

    • @z-beeblebrox
      @z-beeblebrox 4 роки тому +11

      haha "ignorant's advocate" is a great term for it XD

    • @MaanSatan
      @MaanSatan 4 роки тому +2

      I was going to say something of the same sort! I loved Brady's devil's advocate role as much as the frustration of the Prof. :D :D

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen 4 роки тому

      Ignorant by choice or not?

    • @andrewprahst2529
      @andrewprahst2529 4 роки тому +5

      Someone has to do that in every context. If we don't, we could miss out a fuller understanding of the subject.

  • @fjbayt
    @fjbayt 3 роки тому +39

    I really like Brady's playing the Devils advocate, hes doing it so well, nailing every smart rebutal that pseudo scientists can send...

  • @reillybrangan2182
    @reillybrangan2182 4 роки тому +24

    "The man is talking out of his nether regions!"

  • @galaxy7nails613
    @galaxy7nails613 4 роки тому +624

    I think the professor is more handsome than the "energy" healer

    • @bishopchalik8561
      @bishopchalik8561 4 роки тому +55

      Intelligence is attractive.

    • @chadrourke6920
      @chadrourke6920 4 роки тому +34

      It must be due to his “positive energy” lol ;)

    • @EsotericTherapy
      @EsotericTherapy 4 роки тому +35

      In fairness, the energy guy is NOT handsome and I have no idea why they keep saying that.

    • @jbre7233
      @jbre7233 4 роки тому +23

      YES. Science daddy can get it.

    • @Mumsiken
      @Mumsiken 4 роки тому +2

      He does not have a ring. Maybe he doesn’t believe in it or is committed.

  • @whade62000
    @whade62000 4 роки тому +1315

    "The body doesn't end here at the skin, the body is multidimensional"
    Goop lab discovered the 3rd dimension

    • @phaeton5394
      @phaeton5394 4 роки тому +10

      But the 3rd dimension is only one dimension, it is different from 2d, 1d even 4d so even then they are wrong

    • @Chrisisplays
      @Chrisisplays 4 роки тому +3

      @@phaeton5394 But you can't access life multidimensional without the body & since we didn't disprove ghost's yet, the statements stands. Even if we know, it does not work like that. The body is multidimensional, hence our sense development. If we were only 3 Dimensional, things like visions or dejavu's would not make any sense, since we couldn't "leave" our body. How many folds does your brain have, how many make up one dimension? And if the brain is part of the body, isn't the body multidimensional?
      I dont think much of these "labs" but the rethoric of the scam is pretty decent and uses every grey area to nest itself in. Gotta love marketing.

    • @ls200076
      @ls200076 4 роки тому +25

      @@Chrisisplays Time to drink the goop

    • @atmassylphen6785
      @atmassylphen6785 4 роки тому +17

      Chris;is The body isn’t “multi-dimensional.” We simply exist within 3 physical dimensions (up, down, forward/backward) and one temporal dimension (time, although there is much debate on what “time” actually is, though we experience and can measure it similarly to the three spacial dimensions).
      The word “dimension” literally describes physical space, not “layers of reality” or whatever. Further, though this wasn’t brought up: the allegory of “flat world” is used as an analogy to help describe what a higher numerical dimension might look to us in proportion to what our three physical dimensions would look like to a “second dimensional” being. It in no way validates the idea that “flat land” is real or even could be. It’s used to paint a mental picture and that’s all.
      So, no, literally nothing said has anything legitimacy at all.

    • @Chrisisplays
      @Chrisisplays 4 роки тому

      @@atmassylphen6785 So is water not the 4th physical dimension, or does that only go for movie science?
      I don't know what you had in mind, but it is a given, that words are often theories until proven through experiments, tests, readings and countertests. Given, that, as you say, there is no 4th dimension our body exists in, the theory of goop still stands, that the 4th dimension can effect our body. In order to test that, we would have to be able to measure the 4th dimension, right? I think you're to biased and eager to see this as a fluctual input, but I agree, this stuff is often used to market products or services in the name of science nobody actually needs.

  • @danbwn
    @danbwn 4 роки тому +46

    Him: “What do we know about the multi-verse??”
    Him: “Tzeench.”
    Me:
    *Trembles in 40k*

    • @yurischubertzwingli879
      @yurischubertzwingli879 4 роки тому +2

      John Galt it's "Zilch"
      according to the subtitles and google

    • @Goreuncle
      @Goreuncle 3 роки тому +1

      Why 40k? Tzeench already existed in Warhammer fantasy.

  • @traog
    @traog 3 роки тому +17

    If things at a quantum level are affected by things as simple as snapping fingers, i would expect the world to be an extremely chaotic place.

    • @cyborgninjamonkey
      @cyborgninjamonkey Рік тому

      In the pure context, they are and it is-that's a bit of the many reasons that in the applied context, they aren't and it isn't.

  • @bootrous
    @bootrous 4 роки тому +1071

    Brady is not playing Devil's advocate. He's playing devil's troll.

    • @robertw1871
      @robertw1871 4 роки тому +17

      Funny, but I actually think you’re correct 😂

    • @bootrous
      @bootrous 4 роки тому +29

      @@robertw1871 I know right! I swear he was actually trying to wind him up. It was pretty funny tho 😂

    • @HectaSpyrit
      @HectaSpyrit 4 роки тому +8

      He was having a field day whith Phill! He was having so much fun messing around with him XD

    • @22gamefreak
      @22gamefreak 4 роки тому +29

      He's using EXACTLY the type of arguments that these people would use. And I think Phil is responding very well regardless.

    • @ResidentMilf
      @ResidentMilf 4 роки тому +16

      As a reformed woo believer, those are exactly the things I would have said when someone tried to debunk my woo.

  • @zippy-zappa-zeppo-zorba-etc
    @zippy-zappa-zeppo-zorba-etc 4 роки тому +308

    1:58 "the human body has an energy field"
    What kind of energy?
    Mine is potential energy. Has been for 58 years.

    • @msggg9977
      @msggg9977 4 роки тому +2

      zippy zappa zeppo zorba zoolander weird nine is wasted.

    • @santyclause8034
      @santyclause8034 4 роки тому +1

      Any inanimate molecular matter has an 'energy' field. Atomic Bonds have energy fields.

    • @F1fan4eva
      @F1fan4eva 4 роки тому +3

      And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call, suicide by words!

    • @SyntheticFuture
      @SyntheticFuture 4 роки тому +1

      You must be the most effective energy storage device ever zippy =D

    • @Anroll282
      @Anroll282 4 роки тому +2

      You just wait till he starts using it. Oh boy

  • @mrrolandlawrence
    @mrrolandlawrence 3 роки тому +5

    goop works on something rare called "money energy".

  • @rylace
    @rylace 2 роки тому +3

    Truly, completely, utterly, bollocks. I love him.

  • @tommihommi1
    @tommihommi1 4 роки тому +629

    The fact that Netflix hasn't pulled this scam of a show yet says everything

    • @BenStarling
      @BenStarling 4 роки тому +60

      $$$

    • @Lutherus123
      @Lutherus123 4 роки тому +14

      People love trash and controversy. Not "us" .... but enough people.

    • @TheZooropaBaby
      @TheZooropaBaby 4 роки тому +37

      I mean....we live in a neoliberal system, you know? profit has way more importance than so-called truths

    • @bellsTheorem1138
      @bellsTheorem1138 4 роки тому +11

      It's a show? I thought it was just a disinfomercial.

    • @hjembrentkent6181
      @hjembrentkent6181 4 роки тому +4

      It's intentional misinformation about science, sponsored by the owners (China).

  • @nic741
    @nic741 4 роки тому +577

    If you listen carefully enough, you can hear the cries of millions of brain cells.

    • @Ghorda9
      @Ghorda9 4 роки тому +7

      and then silence.

    • @benwinstanleymusic
      @benwinstanleymusic 3 роки тому +4

      the goop lab is fully operational

    • @Digitalhunny
      @Digitalhunny 3 роки тому +1

      My blood moves, I'm magic! 👋😈
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @coolerchills
      @coolerchills 3 роки тому +2

      I can feel the energy field of those angry brain cells

    • @spiralpython1989
      @spiralpython1989 3 роки тому

      But they have been energetically cleaned of their energy, so now there’s nothing left for them to cry about.
      They are just empty little sacs waiting to be filled with some other goopy nonsense...

  • @scottparis6355
    @scottparis6355 3 роки тому +18

    "Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
    "That is not only not right; it is not even wrong"
    Wolfgang Pauli

  • @sake9305
    @sake9305 4 роки тому +784

    I feel his pain. I’m not even a physics professor or even a physics person but Goop in general grinds my gears. It basically nicely packaged and advertised nonsense

    • @Toywins
      @Toywins 4 роки тому +6

      Exactly, a catalogue with articles. THAT'S about it.

    • @splitpitch
      @splitpitch 4 роки тому +13

      at least their title accurately describes the content.

    • @zacsavage8890
      @zacsavage8890 4 роки тому +7

      Snek oil

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 4 роки тому +2

      So is most television nowadays.
      Cant stand watching any of it.

    • @ptaweston
      @ptaweston 3 роки тому +9

      It's worse than nonsense. It's a grift, a con, a money-grab. And science-ignorant people and more than happy to believe it. Humans are born with the innate proclivity to believe in magic and superstitions. The only antidote to a conman like the goop lab is evidence-based knowledge.

  • @LanternFlies
    @LanternFlies 4 роки тому +428

    Paltrow: I have a lab.
    Moriarty: *You having a lab is equivalent to my kid having a kitchen made of plastic and full of playdoh*

  • @Flynnmaster
    @Flynnmaster 9 місяців тому +11

    I think this guy is legit. It only needed a mention of “subatomic manipulation” to make Dr. Moriarty start having an exorcism of his own 😂

  • @Moscatinka
    @Moscatinka Рік тому +9

    I really like the episodes with prof Moriarty. He's got so much energy. 😁

  • @paulashinn
    @paulashinn 4 роки тому +597

    The guy holding the camera honestly does a great job in exposing the thought process behind the whole thing. Great conversation!

    • @BattousaiHBr
      @BattousaiHBr 3 роки тому +27

      ah yes, devil's advocate, an unsung job.

    • @DougHanson2769
      @DougHanson2769 Рік тому +1

      The camera guy was told to kind of give them the benefit of the doubt.

    • @kristjanpeil
      @kristjanpeil 9 місяців тому

      your basic science communication (y)

    • @RafaelBernatto
      @RafaelBernatto 9 місяців тому

      Same reason I like Joe Rogan even though he's a moron in a lot of different ways.

  • @notthere83
    @notthere83 4 роки тому +548

    "Can you blame this guy?" - yes I can. Because he's using those things to rip desperate/naive people off.

    • @Goreuncle
      @Goreuncle 4 роки тому +19

      The people he's scamming are affluent and have nothing better to do with their lives, don't worry.

    • @WelsheDragon
      @WelsheDragon 4 роки тому +27

      And he knows what he is doing, let's face it but I disagree with the notion that 'they are rich so let them be scammed' think of the people that would see this and know that celebrities or others like them are buying into this, suddenly this becomes the new understanding of human physiology and biomechanics

    • @Groovemancer
      @Groovemancer 4 роки тому +11

      @@WelsheDragon Agreed. Looking at the recent wave of anti-vacc'ing.

    • @iamnotinvolved1309
      @iamnotinvolved1309 4 роки тому +9

      @@Goreuncle Is scamming wrong because it's wrong or is scamming wrong only if the person being exploited is poor?

    • @brettknoss486
      @brettknoss486 4 роки тому +2

      @@Goreuncle Define affluent, life savings are a lot more than annual income, and people who have a terminal illness and are desperate can lose their life savings.

  • @actuallyImjustbored
    @actuallyImjustbored 3 роки тому +2

    ooh that little angry jump at 'subatomic level' is hilarious.

  • @BATTIS94
    @BATTIS94 4 роки тому +4

    This almost plays as a socratic dialogue, with a secondary character acting as a medium for the teacher to further explain his point. I love it.

  • @bobdole1105
    @bobdole1105 4 роки тому +220

    I'm only about 4 minutes in and laughing at how every sentence he hears gives him a different pained expression.

    • @musashi939
      @musashi939 4 роки тому

      Insofar this guy is right he can interact with the field of other people. Even over the wire. He's making the prof cringe by watching his video 🤣

  • @BinaryReader
    @BinaryReader 4 роки тому +192

    The thinness of that tablet is orders of magnitudes more interesting than goop. A technical marvel that, what a age we live in.

    • @gonzalezm244
      @gonzalezm244 4 роки тому +1

      BinaryReader the iPad is my favorite device on the planet right now.

    • @orlovsskibet
      @orlovsskibet 4 роки тому +2

      @@gonzalezm244 cool, did you just arrive from the past? 😁

    • @docostler
      @docostler 4 роки тому +40

      @@orlovsskibet We've all just arrived from the past. Where did you come from?

    • @oldoddjobs
      @oldoddjobs 4 роки тому

      Wow gadgets are amazing

    • @MysterX79
      @MysterX79 4 роки тому

      I got a Sony Tablet Z like 5 years ago. Was as thin and as light and to some extend had the same capabilities - lately it was used for streaming services on a daily basis. It died three months ago a horrible screen cracking death on my kitchen floor as I was washing off dirt (since it was waterproof), but it was slipping out of my hands.

  • @_aavara
    @_aavara 3 роки тому +5

    I knew this was gonna be fun to watch when he asked about types of energy

  • @tonygriffin_
    @tonygriffin_ 4 роки тому +11

    You had me at "That's the goop lab...we're here in the science lab".

    • @ejscisreal860
      @ejscisreal860 4 роки тому +1

      With all that tin foil and tangled wires. Looks real, in a quantum sort of way.

  • @DevilishScience
    @DevilishScience 4 роки тому +290

    If Professor Moriarty is being wound up maybe it's clockwork energy.

  • @Bnio
    @Bnio 4 роки тому +389

    10:30 Is the moment Prof. Moriarty's vibrational frequency changed.

  • @VTRDC27
    @VTRDC27 4 роки тому +63

    I like how these goop hacks, just like many other hacks, simultaneously use physics /science to explain and validate their BS while also saying scientists calling them out are being elitist gatekeepers.

    • @andreasv9472
      @andreasv9472 3 роки тому +9

      Textbook. Plus: all scientists are wrong except when they agree with me.

  • @bruinflight1
    @bruinflight1 3 роки тому +3

    I just re-watched this and I have to say, for someone as passionate, invested and goal-driven in their field as Dr Moriarty, his restraint is palpable and greatly respectable.

  • @RFC3514
    @RFC3514 4 роки тому +472

    Double slit experiment according to Gwyneth Paltrow: "Take two of these candles..."

    • @xyz.ijk.
      @xyz.ijk. 4 роки тому +9

      Best comment in here ... I don't know if enough people saw it to appreciate the pure V-ness of it.

    • @musashi939
      @musashi939 4 роки тому +2

      @@xyz.ijk. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @zach6643
      @zach6643 4 роки тому +18

      I can smell the electrons!

    • @xyz.ijk.
      @xyz.ijk. 4 роки тому +4

      @@zach6643 Hahahahaha!

    • @StephenMoore777
      @StephenMoore777 4 роки тому +2

      This is classic comment lad

  • @kingfisher1638
    @kingfisher1638 4 роки тому +157

    The man is basically a hypnotist. He uses authoritative words and uses physical hypnosis tricks to put his victims into a suggestive state and gives them an experience which brings on a strong placebo effect.

    • @Elmithian
      @Elmithian 4 роки тому +8

      That isn't necessarily bad, atl if they didn't lie about it.

    • @nunliski
      @nunliski 4 роки тому +15

      @@Elmithian They HAVE TO LIE ABOUT IT to get the placebo effect. It's just bad. It's disgusting and unethical.

    • @Elmithian
      @Elmithian 4 роки тому +3

      @@nunliski Not really? You just say this is a form of hypnosis that can help the body. No lie there.

    • @nunliski
      @nunliski 4 роки тому +8

      @@Elmithian Wtf are you talking about? You're describing something other than what is depicted in the video. It's not salient to make the point that if they completely changed what they were doing then it might be ethical. Duh.
      Also, that's still a lie. There is no "helping of the body" occurring.

    • @Elmithian
      @Elmithian 4 роки тому +2

      @@nunliski ...you really don't know what placebo is do you?

  • @tommasoascari2706
    @tommasoascari2706 4 роки тому +3

    This is amazing. The counter part in a video is so rare I'm in love with this

  • @AIDAGDA
    @AIDAGDA 4 роки тому +2

    This is one of the best videos I have seen in a while. Loved it

  • @henzsol6771
    @henzsol6771 4 роки тому +204

    I thought, when I heard it was called "the goop lab", that it would be gweneth paltrow making homemade slimes. Not gonna lie... I'm disappointed.

    • @PrincessSixThirteen
      @PrincessSixThirteen 4 роки тому +10

      If the Goop were Gwenyth Paltrow making slimes I might actually watch that.

  • @oogrooq
    @oogrooq 4 роки тому +450

    Those people ought to be sued and Netflix ought to be really ashamed.

    • @jackielinde7568
      @jackielinde7568 4 роки тому +30

      Sadly, they're going to use the disclaimer as their defence. It's the idea that "a rational person should see the bit at the start and know this is bunk." In order to win, you'd need to prove that they knew this stuff was harmful and that people would follow what the video was advocating to the financial benefit of the people making it. It's kind of like suing the tobacco companies in the 70's and 80's.

    • @cabinfever7262
      @cabinfever7262 4 роки тому +3

      $$$$$$$ Talks m8 !

    • @elmo2you
      @elmo2you 4 роки тому +11

      @@jackielinde7568 I think I clearly heard this "healer" literally advocate/claim that his actions have beneficial/healing properties, and hence this show does by extension. Having a disclaimer upfront does not change that. In fact, this disclaimer is like shouting "this is not a robbery!", while executing an armed robbery of a bank. It has no meaning whatsoever. The reason why this show and Netflix don't get sued out of existence for this blatant quackery has little to do with legality, and everything with how the US legal system is fundamentally broken when it comes to serving justice the rich and powerful (not even remotely a new phenomenon either). This is not a legal problem, it's a cultural one (of which the USA has plenty).

    • @5c0tty5
      @5c0tty5 4 роки тому +4

      @@jackielinde7568 the disclaimer said its not medical advise... Didn't say anything about it not being physics advice when they were spouting bollocks about the double slit experiment and quantum

    • @ThePdeHav
      @ThePdeHav 4 роки тому +1

      oogrooq: Agreed

  • @MrUmandMrEr
    @MrUmandMrEr 4 роки тому +27

    Hey Prof dude, your frequency is like really off. You should see a faith healer, and like sort out your chakraaaaaaaas, man.

  • @Anchor9Studios
    @Anchor9Studios 3 роки тому +5

    I really enjoy this subject matter coverage. This video, the problems with high school physics, the angry chemist video from Periodic Videos, etc. It’s humbling to hear scientists talk about problems that exist in the more ‘social’ world or that affects people’s personal lives and hear their opinions on the subjects.

  • @desromic
    @desromic 4 роки тому +252

    "A kilogram of steel is heavier that a kilogram of feathers." ~ Gwyneth Paltrow

    • @salerio61
      @salerio61 4 роки тому +14

      While an ounce of gold actually is heavier than an ounce of feathers

    • @AngDavies
      @AngDavies 4 роки тому +15

      Technically a kilogram of steel is slightly heavier than a kilogram of feathers - it would weigh less on a scale weight is a force and kilogram is mass, and feathers are substantially less dense than steel and thus displace more air and weight less due to buoyancy

    • @salerio61
      @salerio61 4 роки тому +34

      @@AngDavies The weight wouldn't change because of displacement. Weight is the force that gravitation exerts upon a body, equal to the mass of the body times the local acceleration of gravity. Just because it's floating doesn't mean it isn't experiencing a force.

    • @desromic
      @desromic 4 роки тому +11

      @@AngDavies It was a reference to a viral video "1kg of steel VS 1kg of feathers
      ". Also, technically buoyancy is an additional force acting on the feathers, which you only observe if you're in atmosphere. You can talk about weight with or without atmosphere. It's like if I said a Ford F-150 weighs 2200 kg, and you said "Well, it weighs more if it has a trailer attached". Yup. Nailed me. :)

    • @philp4684
      @philp4684 4 роки тому +7

      🎵 Wrong way down a one way stree-eet.

  • @hk-4738
    @hk-4738 4 роки тому +393

    10:30 Something snapped there when "the sub-atomic level" was brought up.

    • @Astralis42
      @Astralis42 4 роки тому +48

      It was that section where you can see a clear change in his body language. He was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt up until they crossed the line into 'physics is just magic!' territory.

    • @lucybiddle3912
      @lucybiddle3912 4 роки тому +33

      That was the dance of a very offended physicist lol

    • @wonderpope
      @wonderpope 4 роки тому +40

      I would say that the guy from the video showed, that he definitely can influence the physicst's sanity from another place and time in the universe without touching him.

    • @hk-4738
      @hk-4738 4 роки тому +3

      @@wonderpope Huehuehuehuehuehue

    • @mrsapplez2007
      @mrsapplez2007 4 роки тому +2

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @pangyre
    @pangyre 4 роки тому

    You are much more fair and kind than any of the people involved deserve.

  • @peterharris9022
    @peterharris9022 3 роки тому

    I love the absolute passion and validity of his argument.

  • @jordibear
    @jordibear 4 роки тому +201

    Will say "bollocks" multiple times, but says "nether regions" instead of "ass"

    • @saiello2061
      @saiello2061 4 роки тому

      He's swear checking himself...

  • @sketcharmslong6289
    @sketcharmslong6289 4 роки тому +216

    "right, that is bollocks."
    - Prof. Philip Moriarty

    • @kenj0418
      @kenj0418 4 роки тому

      You probably should bleep that. :-)

    • @tyranneous
      @tyranneous 4 роки тому

      I lost it at this point. Absolutely brilliant. Leave it in! :D

    • @hansnoor9637
      @hansnoor9637 4 роки тому

      Golden words to live by

  • @Youssii
    @Youssii 4 роки тому +12

    That chiropractor thinks he’s a universal remote for humans

  • @paulfrancis8836
    @paulfrancis8836 3 роки тому +1

    I love the way Professor Philip gets wound up. He's Great.

  • @ophast2128
    @ophast2128 4 роки тому +165

    The way Phil recoils at "subatomic" at 10:30 gives me life

  • @WaxingRadiance
    @WaxingRadiance 4 роки тому +85

    He makes them feel better by removing large amounts of money from their accounts. Its sooooo refreshing !

  • @HoneyB93
    @HoneyB93 2 роки тому

    I appreciate your clear, concise perspective.

  • @pidginmac
    @pidginmac 4 роки тому

    Humble brilliance. Gotta respect that.

  • @GodlessVoice
    @GodlessVoice 4 роки тому +624

    "I don't trust a man that wears all black."
    *Camera pans.*
    😆🤣🙃
    I'm glad you guys have a sense of humor while attacking this...

    • @catnium
      @catnium 4 роки тому +3

      his shirt looks to like its a very dark green tho

    • @a33795
      @a33795 4 роки тому +8

      19:02 Is where it's at

    • @kaktees
      @kaktees 4 роки тому +1

      THE SHADE 😹

    • @renemunkthalund3581
      @renemunkthalund3581 4 роки тому +3

      Moriarty: "I will give him that. The man has got a key sense of style and sartorial elegance." 😆

  • @bruinflight1
    @bruinflight1 4 роки тому +251

    I love Dr. Moriarty:
    "WE WOULDN'T NEED THIS BLOOODY THANG!!!" *waves hand dismissively at $100,000 piece of research apparatus...

    • @danielemessina1979
      @danielemessina1979 4 роки тому +21

      I am pretty sure that is more expensive :)

    • @a51mj12
      @a51mj12 4 роки тому +5

      lol yeah, is this in a same tech class as a sports car, l0l

  • @mygaffer
    @mygaffer 4 роки тому

    I love the challenging of his criticism. Shows the scientific process in action!

  • @kungfumind.
    @kungfumind. 4 роки тому +28

    They're straight up torturing the scientist! Lol

  • @pchelagmail
    @pchelagmail 4 роки тому +87

    "Quantum energy field chakra" is my new spirit animal

    • @ToastbrotRaver
      @ToastbrotRaver 4 роки тому +3

      Paweł Adamski it’s my favorite dish at the local indian

  • @dorylaions
    @dorylaions 4 роки тому +8

    17:02 "i'm influencing my quantum field" lol

  • @hs3881
    @hs3881 3 роки тому +2

    Huge thanks to professor Phil. We need six orders of magnitude more contents like this.

  • @joshlau9279
    @joshlau9279 4 роки тому +361

    “Proved empirically without a shadow of a doubt” is a contradictory sentence. I wonder if goop lab has ever heard of uncertainty in measurement?

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 4 роки тому +43

      "Without a shadow of a doubt" does not mean it's always true. It just means they didn't waste any time doubting it.

    • @jessica4656
      @jessica4656 4 роки тому +8

      @@RFC3514 hahahaha

    • @TheJerbol
      @TheJerbol 4 роки тому +1

      I know what you're talking about but it's not contradictory at all. It's hyperbolic and perhaps redundant, but doesn't contradict anything.

    • @alazrabed
      @alazrabed 4 роки тому +11

      @@TheJerbol Yes it is. Empirical data can only at best promote one explanation over another. A sizable accumulation of uncontradicted data supporting one explanation gives you a pretty solid theory.
      And that's as goos as it's ever going to be. Nothing's ever proven in physics. I can never prove to you that the sun will rise tomorrow. Some yet unobserved fifth force could act during the night and throw our star towards the other end of the galaxy. But it's an unfalsifiable claim so we usually don't bother too much discussing it.

    • @musiqtee
      @musiqtee 3 роки тому

      Empiricism is a process (cycle). Facts must be verifiable by other means than our senses. A fact may still be dynamic due to paradigmatic change in verification method. Doubt is a state of mind, not verifiable, but instrumental in the empirical cycle. Even so, doubt is not admissible to a verified fact, only to the paradigms of the verification. That alone does not change a fact. My opinion is that the OP’s quote is indeed contradictory. 😅👍

  • @RFC3514
    @RFC3514 4 роки тому +353

    I know Professor Moriarty did a lot of bad things (ex., to Sherlock Holmes), but isn't this punishment a bit too harsh?

    • @dbackscott
      @dbackscott 4 роки тому +14

      RFC3514 I was waiting for him to lose his mind and turn into a whimpering mass of twitching (former) physicist on the floor.

    • @annamireault7513
      @annamireault7513 4 роки тому +8

      Finally someone mentioned this.
      I mean he is still a widely known criminal but almost nobody recognised him

    • @Jabranalibabry
      @Jabranalibabry 4 роки тому +2

      Cracked me up, mate :D

    • @8bitlatina845
      @8bitlatina845 4 роки тому

      Fair point.

    • @giacomoferrieri2668
      @giacomoferrieri2668 4 роки тому

      @@annamireault7513 Why?

  • @michaeljames5936
    @michaeljames5936 3 роки тому +3

    I remember reading 'The Tao of Physics' a number of years back, during a difficult time in my life and I desperately wanted to 'believe' that my two great interests at the time: Quantum physics and Meditation were linked and part of a greater whole. One of the most convincing aspects of the book, was the fact that the quotes from physicists about quantum phenomena and of Buddhist practitioners about their refined experience of wordless 'awareness', used strikingly similar wording and phraseology, ergo- they were describing the same thing, but a later, more detached analysis of the quotes, revealed that they were only so similar because they were both descriptions of something that neither could express clearly in words; something mysterious to the people quoted, but essentially both were merely saying 'I don't really understand, what I am trying to talk about'. The seeming relatedness of the phenomena, was merely the relatedness of language when we find it difficult to explain something we find fascinating. The use of words like 'energy', which is extremely difficult to define, allows this same positing of meaning where none actually exists.

  • @wingsandash
    @wingsandash 3 роки тому

    Thank you so, so much, Professor. it was a pleasure to make your acquaintance and listen to you.

  • @_PsychoFish_
    @_PsychoFish_ 4 роки тому +87

    12:54 "quantum energy field chakra" is an amazing combination of words, i have to use that more often xD

  • @io3213
    @io3213 4 роки тому +32

    That healer is so powerful he managed to make your blood boil through video!

  • @yurischubertzwingli879
    @yurischubertzwingli879 4 роки тому +2

    2:04 that sigh said everything

  • @deeprecce9852
    @deeprecce9852 3 роки тому +2

    Absolutely concur with every word coming out of Prof Phillips mouth!!!!! Literally every Word!! This man is my new hero!!!

  • @storyspren
    @storyspren 4 роки тому +177

    "The body is multi-dimensional"
    Yeah, there's like... four of them. Three if you're only counting spatial.

    • @nigelft
      @nigelft 4 роки тому +6

      @@existenceisillusion6528
      You recalled correctly ...
      Hence, in astronomy, you frequently hear reference to space-time as a single entity, as time, especially when observing anything over large enough distance, matters ...

    • @storyspren
      @storyspren 4 роки тому +4

      @@existenceisillusion6528 Yeah, but most people don't really have an intuition for time as a dimension. In everyday contexts, it's often either forgotten because of how differently we perceive it in comparison to the others, or simply ignored (or measured separately) for the sake of convenience.
      So you might be only counting the spatial ones. You won't have decoupled them, you're just forgetting one or, more likely, counting what matters for your purposes.

    • @TheAngelsHaveThePhoneBox
      @TheAngelsHaveThePhoneBox 4 роки тому +10

      *String theorist enters the chat*
      "Actually..."

    • @scriptorpaulina
      @scriptorpaulina 4 роки тому +10

      I, as an astrophysicist, usually call it 3+1, due to the special properties of the temporal “dimension.”
      Also yes, we can’t decouple them as far as distance goes, but we can see that time has special properties as a dimension, that the other three don’t. See: the Kerr, Minkowski, and Schwarzschild metric, which I recall all having a sign change.

    • @MrPabgon
      @MrPabgon 4 роки тому +1

      @@nigelft Yeah, but that doesn't mean there aren't 4 dimensions. There are 4. 3 spatial and 1 of time, right? The fact that they're linked doesn't mean they're the same, right?

  • @erlandodk
    @erlandodk 4 роки тому +157

    "If science knew everything, it'd stop" -- Dara Ó Briain

    • @dookiedooks8378
      @dookiedooks8378 4 роки тому

      One of the best comedy lines ever... ............. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

    • @BanHelsing
      @BanHelsing 4 роки тому +2

      @@dookiedooks8378 what?

    • @wendighoul
      @wendighoul 4 роки тому +19

      @@BanHelsing it is from a Dara Ó Briain comedy show. Paraphrasing "People often come up to me and say 'Science doesn't know everything', which is true. The thing is Science *knows* it doesn't know everything, or else it'd stop."

    • @BanHelsing
      @BanHelsing 4 роки тому

      @@wendighoul oh ok thx

    • @visualdragon
      @visualdragon 4 роки тому

      Beat me to it. :)

  • @jrojala
    @jrojala 4 роки тому

    This is probably the most entertaining thing I’ll see all week

  • @LancetFencing
    @LancetFencing 4 роки тому +12

    I love how he can’t let the vid go for more than 5 seconds before he just has to interject!! Lol 😂

  • @AllGasNoBrakes711
    @AllGasNoBrakes711 4 роки тому +247

    Gwyneth Paltrow is the human equivalent of putting your right hand in your left pocket

    • @CLBOO6
      @CLBOO6 4 роки тому

      Aaron John 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @yogitshankar6348
      @yogitshankar6348 4 роки тому +1

      Accurate

    • @nate_d376
      @nate_d376 4 роки тому +1

      Had to think about that for a second...makes total sense.

    • @HolowatyVlogs
      @HolowatyVlogs 4 роки тому +2

      Underrated comment!

    • @DEATHbyHEMLOCK
      @DEATHbyHEMLOCK 4 роки тому +3

      I do that all the time when my arms are loaded with groceries and I need to get the house keys out of my pocket.

  • @MusicJamSchauspiel
    @MusicJamSchauspiel 4 роки тому +219

    „You might need to bleep a lot.“
    Two seconds later: „the man is talking out of his nether regions“
    ...I think we‘re safe, buddy :)

    • @jollyjokress3852
      @jollyjokress3852 3 роки тому +4

      I think it's funny, because he uses "bollocks" which is really quite severe ;)

    • @markweerheim3628
      @markweerheim3628 3 роки тому

      @@jollyjokress3852 I think the word "bollocks" is the reason he said that

  • @DavidAndrewsPEC
    @DavidAndrewsPEC Рік тому +2

    I'm an engineering physicist and a behaviour analyst. And I can honestly say that - in real life or on the net - this kind of bollocks does to me what it does to Phil here.

  • @ArtBrown
    @ArtBrown 2 роки тому

    My favorite Sixty Symbols video. Well done.

  • @johnnypopulus5521
    @johnnypopulus5521 4 роки тому +376

    So, this guy is a faith healer but instead of using religious terms he's using quantum terms. Cultism.

    • @Polite_Cat
      @Polite_Cat 4 роки тому +23

      no, he calls himself a chiropractor which is about right - tons of chiropractors push this kind of woo-woo psuedoscience and charge tons of money for it. chiropractors are big time scammers.

    • @johnnypopulus5521
      @johnnypopulus5521 4 роки тому +10

      @@Polite_Cat Chiropractor: Using psuedo-medical terms & knowledge to scam people out of their money. Same same.

    • @feedyourspeakers
      @feedyourspeakers 4 роки тому +5

      Interesting but I had injured the area between my ribs and spine in my back and had regular pain, had to miss work etc... I went to a chiropractor, he said it seems there was scar tissue in that area from it healing a bit different. I did 3 sessions and never had that pain come back and never had to return for more visits. Maybe it doesn't work for some but worked for me 100%

    • @maddyvonirsik7391
      @maddyvonirsik7391 4 роки тому

      Wat????

    • @cc3184
      @cc3184 4 роки тому

      I have a great chiropractor. He does deep tissue type work, advocates self management such as core strengthening and doesn't push you to come in for a specific number of sessions. You can usually tell the the bad ones by the fact that they charge a ridiculous amount, push things like paying for xrays and a larger number of sessions being necessary for improvement.

  • @TheWiseTorsk
    @TheWiseTorsk 4 роки тому +103

    The fact that "goop lab" is a show just makes me sad.

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 4 роки тому +2

      Should be a science show for 7 year olds. Instead, it's a home shopping show for (mental) toddlers.

    • @devenblackwell5690
      @devenblackwell5690 4 роки тому +2

      The concept was really cool, bringing up popular woowoo stuff to learn more about it is awesome, but not putting in the other side of the argument or proof is dangerous.