Razavi Electronics2 Lec4: Additional Cascode Examples, Cascode Amp with PMOS Input

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @saadqayyum2148
    @saadqayyum2148 6 років тому +68

    In the review slide of Lec3 at 2:40, there is a slight mistake. The transconductance in the voltage gain expression should be of the input transistor i.e. gm2 instead of gm1.

    • @noth_2
      @noth_2 6 років тому +1

      Yeap!

    • @debabrata2137
      @debabrata2137 5 років тому +1

      @@noth_2 yes

    • @allishere5488
      @allishere5488 5 років тому +1

      Yes

    • @mrkyeokabe
      @mrkyeokabe 4 роки тому +12

      Agreed. Good catch! To spell it out, the equation on the bottom right should be Av ~= -gm2[(gm1*ro1*ro2)//(gm4*ro4*ro3)]

  • @rahultheytv5347
    @rahultheytv5347 3 роки тому +13

    great teachers like you are sufficient, to teach total world, instead of incompetent teachers in every college

  • @coolwinder
    @coolwinder 3 роки тому +10

    01:25 - Intro and Review
    12:22 - Example 1: Change in Cascode Amplifier with Ideal Load when: Bias current is halved, widths are doubled.
    18:35 - Example 2: Change in Cascode Amplifier with Non-Ideal Load
    27:40 - Quiz: Connecting Input Signal on Cascode Transistor
    37:25 - CS Amplifiers with P-Type Input
    44:10 - Cascode Amplifiers with P-Type Input

  • @kyounghobaik5412
    @kyounghobaik5412 6 років тому +34

    The GOD of the Electronics...!!!

  • @joydeepdebnath9741
    @joydeepdebnath9741 6 років тому +9

    Thanks a lot I was dying for this.

  • @iseeyou2235
    @iseeyou2235 5 років тому +7

    Thank you so much professor you explain so well,so easy to understand and for the amazing book 1 of the best!!!!

  • @amitgalkin1215
    @amitgalkin1215 8 місяців тому +1

    Thank you so much proffesor! you made my intuition so much etter then before.

  • @deepaknagar4331
    @deepaknagar4331 6 років тому +6

    Thanks to jio... m watching lecture of a legend in electronics....that too in HD.

  • @akssingh8960
    @akssingh8960 6 років тому +4

    Greetings!!!Welcome back

  • @lokeshwar4093
    @lokeshwar4093 6 років тому +2

    Much Thnx professor teaching method mind blowing and your book fantastic

  • @yasinozbunar8540
    @yasinozbunar8540 Рік тому +1

    Allah razı olsun

  • @mohammedabdulhakabdullaabd1121

    for the Quiz at about 36:00 I assumed r01 to be less than infinity, constructed the SSM and got Gm = gm1/(1+ gm1*r02 + r02/r01) that reduces to Gm = gm1/(1+gm1*r02) when r01 is set to infinity which agrees with the Prof. result. Can anyone else confirm the result with r01 less than infinity?

  • @armanmanukyan1970
    @armanmanukyan1970 6 років тому +3

    Thanks dear professor, but I can't find derivation the transconductance of a degenerated transistor Gm = gm1 / 1+gm1*ro2 in Electronics1. Can you help us by saying where it is exactly.

    • @saadqayyum2148
      @saadqayyum2148 6 років тому +1

      It should not be too difficult to derive using the small signal analysis.

    • @amitkumar-sh2lk
      @amitkumar-sh2lk 4 роки тому +1

      bro as now Vgs= Vin- Iout*r02 thats why Gm is not equal to gm1

    • @choco_chanel5377
      @choco_chanel5377 4 роки тому

      @@amitkumar-sh2lk Thanks it helps

    • @mutasemwahbeh6954
      @mutasemwahbeh6954 3 роки тому +3

      From small signal analysis taking a degeneration into account we have 2 equations :KVL gives Vin = V1 + (gm *r02*V1) , KCL gives : Vout = gm*V1*r02 ,,, cancel Vi from both equations and put both equation in AV form yields : Vout/Vin = gm * r02 /(1+gm*r02),,,, and if we rewrite it in a new form Av = - Gm * Rout gives Gm = gm/(1+gm*r02)
      Hope it helps

    • @chinthalaadireddy2165
      @chinthalaadireddy2165 Рік тому

      @@mutasemwahbeh6954 Thank you so much!

  • @srinivasan7790
    @srinivasan7790 6 років тому +1

    since in cascode, as ID is same, gm of pmons and nmos must be same? why he says change is transcondutance.

  • @mdkalimullah4207
    @mdkalimullah4207 6 років тому +3

    Encyclopedia of edc and analog electronics

  • @theminertom11551
    @theminertom11551 Рік тому

    Sorry, but am I being ignorant? It seems to me that the big equation for gm for Av in the center of the page should be -gm2 not -gm1.

  • @dogdogdog2024
    @dogdogdog2024 6 років тому +2

    thanks prof

  • @Sourav_Soumyajit
    @Sourav_Soumyajit 2 роки тому

    Explanation ❤

  • @rahultheytv5347
    @rahultheytv5347 3 роки тому +1

    please also do lectures on MIXED SIGNALS , please sir

  • @enesog
    @enesog 4 роки тому

    Interesting lecture

  • @AnimationsJungle
    @AnimationsJungle 4 роки тому

    brilliant .....

  • @rajamajhi2012
    @rajamajhi2012 6 років тому +2

    God

  • @raminrajabioskouei781
    @raminrajabioskouei781 6 років тому +1

    Thanks

  • @mrpossible5696
    @mrpossible5696 5 років тому +1

    18:31

  • @CheeseBurg1203
    @CheeseBurg1203 5 років тому

    at 25:06, Av=1Av , Because 1/sqrt(2) * [4/sqrt(2) || 4/sqrt(2)] = 1

    • @ozgunyurutken9485
      @ozgunyurutken9485 4 роки тому +5

      the multiplying factors are not in parallel. If R1 || R2 and both of them being multiplied by some factor x, the overall result is multiplied by factor of x, so the answer is 1/sqrt(2) * 4/sqrt(2) = 2

    • @CheeseBurg1203
      @CheeseBurg1203 4 роки тому +1

      @@ozgunyurutken9485 oh, I was wrong
      Thank you very much

  • @Specialist_Engineers_Team
    @Specialist_Engineers_Team 11 місяців тому

    Back music is so irritating 😢

  • @histimemanof4954
    @histimemanof4954 6 років тому +4

    I wish youtube add *3 speed

  • @mohammedabdulhakabdullaabd1121

    for the Quiz at about 36:00 I assumed r01 to be less than infinity, constructed the SSM and got Gm = gm1/(1+ gm1*r02 + r02/r01) that reduces to Gm = gm1/(1+gm1*r02) when r01 is set to infinity which agrees with the Prof. result. Can anyone else confirm the result with r01 less than infinity?

  • @mrpossible5696
    @mrpossible5696 5 років тому

    30:29