EV300D VS Skyzone03O VS Fatshark HDO Delayed comparison

Using the latest software from bit.ly/32qjpQH
The delay of 03O is the longest, and the delay of HDO and EV300D is basically the same.
Test Conditions：
1. Test Machine : SKYZONE 03O \ FATSHARK HDO
EACHINE EV300D
2.CAMERA : NTSC Runcam micro eagle
3. Stopwatch URL:online-stopwatc...
4. video-shooting equipment : Gopro HS5
Result : 1.According to the test results, I think that the
2.EV300D V1.3 firmware has solved the delay
3.problem, the effect is the same as FATSHARK
4.HDO, and better than SKYZONE 03O.
Product link:www.eachine.co...

[@eachine3596]

Firmware continues to be optimized

[@kilevine2359]

Will be avaliable soon?

[@Daragon]

any news ? one month has already passed

[@KosherHobby]

Only one perfect! battery box is perfect in ev300d. Eachine if you read it, just start to sell battery box and straps from ev300d separately!

[@CorradoCorradini77]

from the tests that other UA-camrs are doing it does not seem true ... the latency is higher than the other glasses mentioned, and there is also a nuisance in the image

[@kevinbernitz6580]

The most recent version delay is worse than the previous version. Which is worse than other glasses.
Please see some good measurements here (not mine):
ua-cam.com/video/anoDAZ3SpZg/v-deo.html
Also the video quality of the current version is far worse than previous versions (jumpy images and very noisy).

[@GianmariaVeronese]

This test is useless. Screen is running at 60Hz, so no way you can properly calculate the delay. Do that with an oscilloscope.

[@corneliudoc]

The idea is to see the difference between them

[@GianmariaVeronese]

But this way you simply cannot.