I disagree with this video. Learning code isn't about the job you get. Sure that's nice, but that's not why people should learn to code. Also the "critical thinking skills" line is just a line. Coding might teach that, but not as much as other things. If coding teaches basic cognitive skills, it's an understanding of algorithms. The real reason everyone should learn to code is the same reason anyone who owns a car should know how to change a tire and a few other basic auto maintenance skills. The same reason everyone who owns a home should know basic home repair. Everyone doesn't have to be fluent in multiple programming languages but having a loose familiarity with a few of the most common can help people understand how the computerized layer of society works. Most important, mass teaching of code to young people will help that generation be more accepting of technological change and less likely to become neoluddites when automation takes over. They'll have a basic understanding of the logic structures automation is built on and the engineering behind the machines, and that will hopefully avoid having any new John Henry wannabes.
PolyMatter I totally disagree with u on this video, I think just like u learn maths and science, u should also learn coding, just at a later stage. With that said, I agree totally with that 60 minutes class bit
"Everyone should code!" - Tech companies that know that more programmers means lower wages "Not everyone should code!" - The programmer who knows that less programmers means higher wages
@Confidential Name machine translation is notoriously awful, you can only use google translate or others for everyday shit, but if you wanted to translate books or other things where the language is more nuanced you still need a human translator. We're still very very far off from the future where machines can take over complex jobs like translation and programming
@Confidential Name well, yes we got an AI which can do some basic stuff. but they can't replace the job completely, because we can't trust it the same as a human. To ride wit auto-piolt you still have to be ready that the program will make a mistake and ride yourself. It will take long time until we get a trustworthy AI, and more until we get complex AI which can take a complex job on it's own. A
@@rodrigozanabria2978 Google Translate is not the benchmark and hasn’t been for a long time. Professional translators use machine translations to do the majority of the work for them. They just go through and tidy things up afterwards.
coding is basically: > stackoverflow; > trying to find the error on line 32; > stackoverflow; > dealing with MS office BS when trying to present your product to the customer; > stackoverflow; > indian youtuber showing the error you're trying to solve; > stackoverflow;
Yeah, I remember when I first started out and holy shiii that sucked a ton because I was learning Python v3, HTML, and PBASIC all at once while learning hard ware engineering.
omfg this hit. this hit like a truck. wth am i doing here, with pycharm opened in the background and a program to be made. I'm so predictable... Edit: 11 months late I’m a failure and the program was never made. Haven’t coded in months. Also severely depressed. Gg boiiiis
It was the opposite for me. I only started to like programming when I first tried it at uni. Before that I thought it would just be really tedious and boring
FlappyPhantom I can understand why you would think that...If this is the first Polymatter video. But I think your opinion would change after you viewed some of Polymatter’s other videos. If anything, I think Skillshare should be given kudos for recognizing a high production value video with a highly relevant topic to buy ad placement.
"Coding" can be everyone's basic skill. "Programming"? Good luck coping with that. You know how to speak English but writing a good book is not an easy job.
A perfect comparison between just "coding" and actually "bringing a product to market". A big difference! The "art of programming" involves solving actual problems, by mastering the platform's hardware and software capabilities and its limitations. So yeah, there's a lot more to programming than just banging out some code on the keyboard, from using web API's effectively to creating a compelling UI's, captivating graphics, great music, etc, etc. Otherwise everybody would be a Stephen King or James Patterson of writing, but it's the content you write not just a bunch of words.
I always say to my non-coding friends that a coder is someone who can write code; a programmer is someone who knows how to fix their code, to plan their code, and to market their code.
programming in movies: *I JUST BREACHED THE MOST SECURE FIREWALL AND HACKED INTO THE WHITE HOUSE BANK AND CRASHED THE STOCK MARKET AND BLEW UP THE ISS* programming in real life: oh i forgot to close my for loop
rayan im a computer programmer and a robot programmer you only see it on movies that is just numbers use some brain ok it aint easy do you think its easy it can take a week even months or years you little shit
@@fbi_2rex489 If your a computer and robot programmer you should be smarter. Realise that rayan is referring to how it looks in movies not in real life "you little shit"
As a programmer myself, I'm in favor of schools teaching basic programming skills as a mandatory course, but not so that everybody can become a programmer. Rather, I think that so much of our world is run on code that it's important to "demystify" it.
And a communication aid. In my software engineering major in college, we needed to take computer architecture so we can kinda talk with the hardware guys. And the it security branch has basic economics as a mandatory course so they can talk with business people
yes just like basic science is taught, which makes us understand how things works, coding should be taught to teach how programs work since they are very much integrated in our life now
I think it's useless. I mean how many kids complain about having to do maths and science? They forget everything after they graduate anyway. There's no point teaching these subjects to people who aren't interested. Basic maths and science should be taught but everything else is useless for the average person who isn't smart enough nor interested enough to do any of these type of subjects. Imagine forcing the average high school kid to learn coding on top of science and maths, they'd hate it
That is exactly the thing. It's about that point in time. If you really love programming, you wouldn't be budged so easily by one or two bugs giving you a hard time.
@@goji5887 Me: working 6 hours to fix three bugs that turned into 10 then 106 then finally fixed those sons of bitches Agreed this is a patience game it can be very fun if you are logical and love extreme puzzles like how you can't get something to work and you test tons and tons of ideas and theories that fail but if you love the career you just want that satisfaction of finally getting it done without bugs or errors then all those hours were worth it for that satisfaction.
Why should someone make money for annoying people with useless, biased information? This type of advertising completely devalues the credibility of anything this channel says. It means that this channels producers don't have the integrity to distinguish between paid content and neutral information and sucker people into watching their ads.
If you don't like the content: don't watch the ads. If you do and would like to support the creator; then leave the ads running. Everything you see is biased, doesn't mean it's useless. Far from it.
Programming is like cooking. Not everybody should be a chef, but basic cooking skills are incredibly useful in life, and it's the same for basic scripting and programming.
Basic cooking skills aren't necessarily "useful", considering there are many fast food places that will sell you food for extremely cheap. Sure, your lifespan will probably decrease incredibly if you continue to eat fast food over and over, but that's what it's like for the average person.
@@asciidude It's very useful. Unless you live in an area with a culinary scene like Singapore, it'll almost always be both cheaper and healthier to cook on your own, hence why almost everyone does.
@@planefan082 I'm not so sure about cheaper, but I'm also 15. I just assumed it was cheaper for fast food rather than making your own - after what I've heard from peoples experiences.
i feel jealous of those elementary kids learning about coding in school, reminds me of how older people told me they felt about not knowing how to use a computer
I learned to code at a young age, but I think programming is a boring job. Coding is easy to learn though. Im pursuing an entertainment design career which takes a lot more work to learn, but it’s a cool job.
@@Omar-te1pp yep and the languages and technologies used in programming today often won't be used when those kids become adults but math and logic skills will still carry over
James Hall Capitalisation isn't grammar, grammar is part of the structure of the language, not necessarily how it's written. Without capitals, it still makes grammatical sense, and in the same way too; therefore to omit a capital is not a grammatical mistake here.
How about, instead of "everyone should code", "everyone should understand how computers work?" In the same way we should have a rudimentary knowledge of a wide array of subjects to help us thrive in complex societies.
@@martinkunev9911 I know right. Imagine if there was no driving licence. My grandfather is beginning to succumb to dementia, he's had his driving licence taken away for the good of his health. But he's still using his computer, and it's costing him thousands as he falls into scam after scam. It's heartbreaking.
even that's a little complex when you dive in deeper, most kernals are made in c/c++, you know how memory in them works? Its kinda complex ngl, 2 data structures, Stack and Heap and it also has many other parts. What is a 8-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit integer? 8-bit integers contains 8 bits, 1 bit either contains 0 or 1, then there is signed and unsigned integers. 8-bit integer ranges from -127 to 127 (for signed integers), and no, its not memorized there's a formula for it, 2^n-1 in positive and (2^n-1)-1 in negative, in unsigned integers it ranges from 0 to 256, formula, 2^n. Wanna know how images are displayed? they are 3d arrays, or 2d matrix. How gpu helps? it deals with Graphics or whats displayed on the screen, so they need to be VERY good at matrix opperations.
Technically you can learn "programming" just off of UA-cam since plenty of people make great videos on different programming languages. You can also learn computer science, but there aren't that many good videos.
@Winston Mcgee I'm learning coding from youtube, like a lot. Also, it IS "coding". This is a natural course language took, not like the tens of new pronouns being thought of each day and made to be acknowledge, coding is understood, you stupid fuck.
I've been programming for 40 years, professionally for 31. I have a BS and MS in CS. I have never, ever, ever "solved complex mathematical problems". Unless, of course, "mathematical problems" is defined in some novel equivocal way. I agree programming is harder than 14 weeks, but I'm not sure our host has really explained Why it is.
@@hil449 even for faang, most of the time, you wont complex math interviews, its mostly data structures and algorithms. math heavy question might appear in fintech interviews or competitive programming afaik and of course some esoteric research fields or industries.
@@mikeb4471 let me guess, you don't know anything about programming / software engineering and are just salty because you have to work 10 hours a day in a job that mostly is about physical work?
Completely disagree, the best thing about programming is when you have spent 6 hours building a system without ever running it, and everything works the first time you run it! :D
I don't think that's just exclusive to programming as in you will def feel like heaven when you finally solve a problem you were agonizing with for hours.
Jacques Francois Yep. Look at the AAA game development industry. Lots of people want to make games so that drove the salary of a game dev down to $40,000 on average despite the bad conditions and extra long hours. You know that pressure you feel to work harder and longer right before a deadline? Now imagine doing that all the time instead of just during crunch time.
I truly believe that you don"t know if "programming is for you" or not until you're in too deep to back down, and that goes for most skills. So, in my opinion, everyone who is curious should at least give it a shot, and making it a school subject could provide an outlet for that.
Based on my shitty math skills thanks to me learning to code and not learn real math, I estimate that's about ... a fairly decent percentage of the world.
I have been in programming field since I was 8, I am still rookie as I spent time on many other stuffs, but I can assure that Indian programmers mostly are not good. I am Indian by the way
@@alexwang982 A lot of people start to learn how to code, then give up halfway. There are also a bunch of people who learned how to code, finish it, but then has no idea what to do next. To answer your question, try making something. Create. Do a project. Build your own website or build an app or program a game. Learn it, then apply what you've learned. That's the only way to know if it's for you or not. I started learning how to code because I wanted to build an app. So my learning process was centered around that. It helped me understand the process better. Have a goal. Don't learn for the sake or learning. Apply what you learn.
Agreed. For most fresh graduates, what they only know about the IT industry is programming. But it's so much more than that. Project managers, support resources, line managers keep the business running.
I think that you need to read to be able to code... at least understanding some of the words will help dramatically. I have difficulty imagining someone who can't read but can code... possible, but not realistic.
Coding is very difficult to learn. However, whats nice is that you only need to learn it once. After that it's incredibly easy to replicate and people still think you're a wizard.
donov25 If it we’re any other UA-camr, I’d have to agree with you. But these ads are at the end of a very informative, concise, and well crafted video. And on top of that, have excellent transitions and are relevant to the video... which is the key point that so many other content creators seem to forget. People put Dyson vacuum ads on car videos and I’m like what the heck?!? As long as the ads remain relevant and with creative and/or funny transitions, it’s totally fine by me.
"Unlike reading and writing, it's too hard for everyone to learn it" I guess few hundreds years ago people would say the same about reading and writing
@jocaguz18 I disagree. Anyone can memorize syntax, but truly understanding programming languages (I say "languages" in plural because most of us know more than one) enough to be able to solve problems with it is not something everyone is capable of. Sure, you can hand some teenagers a PC with Scratch, but if you give them the logic behind a sorting algorithm and tell them to convert that to source code, and most of them wouldn't be able to solve that problem. And that's just something basic.
@jocaguz18 i think you are the one missing the point. Consider the following: One, your argument that "everyone should code" is flawed when you begin to consider the oppurtunity cost. Learning a language, both programming and natural lanngue, requires a significant time investment that could be spent on other more valuable skills. Two, unlike natural language, many programming languages and concepts require a certain mindset condusive towards the types of problems encountered by programmers. Recursion and pointers are typically considered the most confusing of programing conscepts for beginers. Amongst my peers, the ones most comfortable with those two concepts and with an innate tallent for comprehending them have become the most adpept programmers within my peer group. Three, your claim that code is more like english because it is in english is remarkably asinine. I dont think english as a language has pointers, recursion, stacks, queues, loops, and about a dozen different data structures as key concepts to be known and understood before you can even begin to speek it fluently. Even knowing these core concepts there are still dozens of other useful tools and concepts that are required within varius other fields of expertise in computer science. Even between different languages you will find completely different concepts. For example, F# is nothing like C#. Four, programming can be an incredibly time consuming and mentally exhausting task. Some people are not capable of working like this for extended periods of time. I dont mean they are stupid, but some people just hate this sort of work and would prefer to do something physical. For fucks sake, I ENJOY programming and there are days where want to get the fuck out of the computer lab and never look back after spending over 30 hours in it over the course of two days.
@jocaguz18 No, your point doesn't stand. Coding languages are a means to an end. Unless you're going to learn to build programs and solve problems with it, learning it (or rather, memorizing syntax) is pointless because you gain similar skills from learning regular spoken languages and memorizing other things. It's just as pointless as the fact that we teach high schoolers calculus when most of them will never use it if they don't pursue a degree in a STEM-related field. Calculus teaches you certain skills, yes, but it doesn't teach you how to file your taxes, manage finances, or even be a good person. Same with "coding". If we're gonna add something to the list of essential skills to be taught to everyone, it had better be life skills as opposed to more STEM-based courses that the overwhelming majority of people will never need to know or use in life. As interesting as learning about Nodes and Binary Search Trees was for a nerd like me in college, I wouldn't wish that on anyone who's not already interested in that sort of thing.
@jocaguz18 So because people don't learn Calc in high school where you are, that's suddenly a weakness in my argument? Well news flash, regular (non-STEM) high schoolers in many US school systems do and we don't even have that good of an education system. My argument stating that teaching high schoolers Calc is pointless isn't suddenly invalidated by the fact that high schoolers in some parts of the world don't have to learn it. I didn't say that we teach "all" high schoolers Calc and shouldn't, so I have no idea what you're getting at here by saying that invalidates my argument. You say I committed a whataboutism fallacy, but you didn't even reference that fallacy correctly. Use the correct fallacy, or run back to r/iamverysmart because this is a comment section on UA-cam. Nobody cares about logical fallacies. Everyone online who thinks they're smart references them as if they're a holy set of rules that should guide every conversation. In reality they're a tool used to create airtight arguments in formal debate or sophisticated discourse, but since you've already resorted to insulting almost everyone here who disagrees with you, this discussion is neither. If you're accusing me of playing mental gymnastics, I think you should have a look at your display of plaques, trophies, and medals for the sport and be proud. You earned them. If you want to take this discussion further respectfully, I'm open, but I've noticed that in online interactions if someone brings up logical fallacies, their IQ, or both during a discussion, they're probably completely incapable of respectful discourse and likely lack a lot of self-awareness. I've been unfortunate enough to run into your type a lot online.
@jocaguz18 Lol thanks for confirming my suspicion that you were indeed the exact type I thought you were. Congratulations. A "smart" guy who, even with all of his alleged intelligence, thinks because he's smart enough that he's above the idea of showing basic respect to the people he interacts with. A guy so smart that he lacks basic self-awareness. I've met plenty of them online and every time I find them less intimidating and more hilarious and pitiful. You got into debate club in high school. Do you want a cookie? We're adults now, or at least I am. You're not gonna get any "cool kid" points for being in debate club when you were in school. That's laughable. This discussion is about what's going on right now, and your debate club membership clearly says nothing about your debate acumen as of now because it didn't change the fact that you're utterly incapable of respectful disagreement without resorting to insults. This just makes your bragging even more hilarious. "You, at no point, made an argument to explain why it is not a important skill" This right here shows that your debate club membership means nothing. You don't even understand your opponent's argument. I wasn't making the argument that it wasn't an important skill to have. Obviously I wouldn't think that as a programmer. I was making the argument that it wasn't an important skill for *everyone* to have, and I'd like to point out that you also have yet to prove why it is. And if you learned a single thing from your cute little debate club, you'd realize the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim. You made both the positive claim and the first claim, so the burden of proof is on you to prove it, and not on me to disprove it. Before you try to look cool and smart throwing logical fallacies into the arena, make sure you actually understand your opponent's argument. And yes, making the argument that there *are* more important skills is a valid argument to make because I wasn't arguing against the importance of coding as a skill in the first place. If my ship has a 30-foot gash on the left side and a 3-foot scrape on the other, which one should I address first? People shouldn't be learning even rudimentary computer logic before they're taught basic common sense and life skills. Walk before you run. And no, I don't just "think I'm smart". I don't care about that stuff anymore. There are people who aren't nearly as smart as me (at least in the ways society values) who are still much better people. If more folks cared more about being better people than they did about trying to be pseudo-intelligent and "logical" like your Jordan Petersens and your Ben Shapiros, the world would be in a much better place. Intelligence isn't everything. I know your type because I used to be your type... and then I grew up. :/
I honestly think that if you get into programming without loving it, you're going to hate it. The sheer mental effort that you need to excel at requires passion for the subject, not just "oh, I want to make cash". For example, I love building things. I love making projects. I can easily spend 8-10 hours just programming per day without stopping when I'm working on a product. Would I be able to do it without that passion? Nope. Not at all.
At some point it may become like reading and writing though. Some kids don't like to read, they don't become literary critics in life but they still need to learn how to read. If you don't like math you need not become a mathematician or phycisist, but some exposure is still strongly recommended. The same will probably apply for programming.
@@mitnick212 That's not always the case, the opposite can be true where the more you are exposed to it, the more resent you grow for it. Which can make you miserable. I think what they mean to say is that you need to be interested in it for the sake of coding, not money.
@@Karategirl5947 Yes, but people (and corps) make it out to be easy money, just like engineering when it can take real time and effort. That's the problem here. It's creating unfair/unrealistic expectations for people.
HappyMan's 2nd Channel - Poetry does not „roll off the tongue”. You confuse the worthless school assignments with a lifework or a poet that is genuinely earning his bread with it. Real poetry is not less hard than clean purpose programming. I would argue it is even way harder, because you need inspiration for it instead of just using it as a tool.
I went into this already disagreeing with the videos thesis. By the end of it you'd countered every point I had, and had convinced me of your stance. Thank you for this, it was quite eye opening
I still disagree to some extent. I always thought the idea that everyone should become a programmer was rather stupid, but I do think programming as a skill will still be essential. It’s inevitable that most positions will require some form of low level automation. That’s not to say everyone should have formal training in algorithms, but a basic understanding of scripting and such would be useful in almost any profession.
Dafuzz I'd say that we are far enough into the 21st century and the proliferation of smartphones that the average person should never need to write ANY code. In this day and age, if an app from the play store or apple store can't do it, then they would have already hired a programmer by then.
My high school forced students to learn C# and I have to say this video is so right. Nobody ever asked "when are we gonna use this in real life" so often in one class period.
This goes for any class in HS, math, english, science, history, etc. But the point of these is to get students to explore new shit that they're interested in and may pursue that career in further education. Why learn Pythagorean theorem? Well, some dude in your class may be interested in construction, who knows.
I'm not sure how you pull off those ads, my thoughts drift into the video when suddenly wild ad appears. by the time I realize it's there its over. Kudos!
"everyone learns differently, and at a different pace, and likes different things" Compulsory high school classes: *im about to end this mans entire career*
@@hilal_younus no, although each state is different. Mine required 3 years of history, 1 year of economics, one year of financial literacy, 1 year of sociology and psychology, 4 of language arts, 4 of math, 1 of gym, 1 of an additional language, 1 of art or music, and 3 of science
Dude yes. I've learnt how to code using unity, a game engine I'm sure you've probably heard of. Not only have I learnt how to code but I've developed so many other skills like how to use complicated interfaces, art, sound design and more Once you learn the basics of your language and engine, you can make alot of cool things I cannot emphasize enough how important knowing a good bit of code is for game design, because then you know your limits and you don't have to code all the time as there are so many other things you can work on in a project. And just have fun, and remember it will be hard but a little preservance goes a long way, it wasn't easy for me, but I absolutely love the talents I have now Please don't give up :)
My first commercial program was a 4 player volleyball game I wrote for a national magazine back in 1981. The magazine would publish games written in Basic for Radio Shack, Apple, and Atari computers. I learned a great deal by studying the listings.
The video was clear and on point. My take: The general consensus is Programming/Coding is just knowing and remembering the syntax. The truth is it also involves own logic, creativity, genuine interest for problem solving and understanding the purpose of coding. It requires thinking about the smallest possible detail and converting it into a code of suitable programming language based on the available hardware and software resources.
Shanmuka Nalli but these are some things that I think the general public will need to have a basic understanding of in the future. At the same level that highschool algebra does not make you a mathematician but does give you pattern recognition skills that are advantageous in day to day activities.
Chigeh I agree with your point. A general knowledge of programming/code is essential in current times. My point is: Better awareness and understanding of the job profile of a programmer is required so that the right people take it up as a job. Coding as a general subject is necessary but coding as a job is a different ball game. For example: Mathematics knowledge is essential for everyone but only few should take up Accounting job as it requires genuine interest and specialization. In short: I meant there is lack of clarity regarding Coding as a essential Subject and specialized Job
What you refer to is known more as software engineering. If you know how to code, you can hack together a program that does what you want, sure. But that sure as heck isn't what all those great technology companies do. What they do isn't coding, it's software engineering at its finest. The actual programming (in the sole activity being writing the code) is maybe like 10% of the work. Thats why I don't agree when people say children should learn how to code (again, in the sense of hacking together bits of code that do the thing). Rather, they should learn the concepts of tackling a complicated problem, breaking them up in smaller ones and being creative about solving them that really make this job what it is. Because these are universal skills you can apply in much more situations in life rather than knowing how to type up a hello world function.
Yeah, I have actually enjoyed the video up to that point and then audibly i went "oh fuck you". Pulling shit like this completely destroys whatever point you were making.
but ... He wants to get benefits from this video, he did a lot of hard work for making this video, hours and hours, is it hard for you to see a skippable ad to give him at least the motivation to make more videos like this?
I really don't get why you guys get all salty about this. You see the ad, you stop the video. Is that simple. Is not ethical to ask for good video content while condemning its creator for trying to make a living out of them.
That sponsor transition was so smooth I slipped on it and fell
6 років тому+432
Oh my god. I am a CS student and I’ve been thinking about this exact same thing recently. I cannot express how much I agree with you! It bothers me so much when people talk about this without knowing what it’s really like. And let me just point out that if it were that easy then I wouldn’t be going for 4+ years to university to do this. Programming is so much more than knowing how to write code.
Exactly! There is a huge difference between a coder and an actual programmer. I see many CS students in my college are excitedly discussing about AI, neural network, data mining, robotics and all other huge topics in CS field all the times. Yet they can't comprehends well on very essential topics like big O notation, divide-and-conquer algorithms, dynamic programming, BFS, DFS, minimum span tree , searching shortest paths and so on
Ever García Nguyen Nguyen To be honest I disagree entirely with that assertion. Yes, coding is a highly sought after skill currently, but it’s no more special or intricate then nearly any other field of research, it’s current applications mean little about the content of the curriculum. Personally, I think the types of programming you refer to will be streamlined and demand negated as the learning curve declines. The video seems to suggest that as we move forward, coding will become more and more essential, when really it’s just the opposite. And no, programming isn’t so much more about knowing how to write code, programming is ONLY knowing how to write code. Just because a job requires knowledge in other fields doesn’t take away the essential nature of the job itself.
Meh, I went through much of the CS program at my university, it's a huge lie to say you're learning for 4 years, 2 years are spent on completely useless General Education with maybe a single class or two being useful, and don't give that "it makes you well rounded" stuff, it means nothing, no one I've spoken to (and I've complained about this to everyone) has been able to define "well rounded" or defend how GE achieves it. So, that 50% of university time and money wasted. Now, for the actual CS program, at least in the California State University system, half of it is impractical, almost useless. I came to learn software engineering, yet I had to take many math classes that are never utilized in my CS courses, I had to take Computer Architecture and Assembly Language among others which had maybe 2 class days of utility each. The programming courses I took also felt a bit repetitive among each other. The ONLY thing one will learn of value from a 4 year university is 6 months of knowledge and skills and a piece of paper for your resume. I wouldn't recommend getting a CS degree, instead find a good technical school that will teach you practical CS and get certifications, internships, low level jobs, etc. Study on your own as well. A BS in CS is BS. I don't know about MS though, maybe that's better, but I'm done with school.
My thought is that eventually AI will code better, more efficiently, and cheaper that human beings. And many programmers will lose their jobs.
6 років тому+12
Jose Carlos Moreno A lot of the courses I’ve taken so far (I’m at the end of my 2nd year) haven’t been useless. All math courses, which I loved, such as Calculus, Algebra, Probability/Statistics, have helped me in one way or another to do more at the time of creating software. Knowing Assembly Language (which I do, specifically MIPS), helps you understand at a much deeper level what’s really going on behind the keywords. What I want to emphasize when I say that programming is so much more than coding is that when doing so there are things you’re only aware of once you’ve understood much deeper topics such as low-level programming, algorithm design, etc, skills which rely on other skills such as maths and physics to correctly understand! I cannot believe you just said you don’t recommend people getting a CS degree because of these reasons you mentioned. Oh my god.
Bago Garde because I know a lot of people in my major that “know how to code” in the sense that they can watch a YT video on classes or functions and know what to type to not produce error but they don’t actually know how to evaluate and think about an advanced coding problem from the ground up and build a system to do it. They struggle with the assignments we are given now that we are juniors/seniors because they require a deeper level of understanding that you can’t just get from looking at YT videos.
MH Charles-Etuk Can you not get them by listening at the lectures and doing what you need to do? (I have applied for CS so would be nice to know what to expect)
jojomen100 I mean idk how it is at your school but here the teachers don’t exactly spell it out for you. They tell you how to do it but if it doesn’t come naturally to you then it’ll be hard. Especially cause they don’t teach you HOW to do a project before they give it to you
MH Charles-Etuk Yeah but as i see it, it's pretty obligatory to put lots of your own work in it, so no matter if it comes naturally to you or not it's still not unreasonable as long as you put in work.
So relatable. I even recommend the same 3 subjects for schools. In fact, this was so relatable that I did not even hear anything new. It was just put in a structured and visually pleasing way.
only people who truly want to code should do it, obviously. i thought i would do it in college and quickly realized i don't give a single shit about it
Thank you for this video, especially for differentiating between CS and Programming. As a CS PhD student and educator, I encounter hundreds of students misled by the "everybody can code" narrative pushed by universities, programs like Hour of Code, and so on. They're not the same thing, great video.
I have to agree, this also goes for every other subject. Governments and other institutions try to force more people into STEM or whatever is popular at the time. They show only the simple and exiting stuff. This mouth-breathing " I fucking love science" culture leads to many starting college but few finishing. I do electrical engineering and after my first semester almost half left or had to repeat courses. I am almost done now and it seems like 30% will finish in the standard time frame.
I self taught myself programming and computer science starting with JavaScript and QBASIC in 2nd grade Summer camp. After the lessons, still during camp, I tried to code more complex programs myself in QBASIC. I then started Visual Basic on my own and taught myself through videos and articles. I actually posted a program up at CodePlex back in the day when I was just 10. I actually programmed for fun. I actually taught myself C++ back then in order to hack COD4. I ended up writing my own hack and using it. I did basic reverse engineering back then (I started learning how to read x86 ASM back then), but mostly took offsets and addresses posted online. In middle school, I taught myself how to write whole programs in x86 using NASM. When my parents used to send me to those stupid summer camps again, it was so boring because it was those "everyone can code" crap, but it did open my eyes to computer science. It was painful to go there. My parents couldn't understand why I program all the time, but hate these camps.
@The Eclectic Dyslexic Well exactly. Though it is worth noting that CS has a huge identity problem to the wider public, so for people to decide "they are not really suited for computer science" until they have played their chips by spending thousands of dollars usually doesn't go well. I've met numerous students that found "it was not really suited for them", but stay in the program as they've invested too long into it already. This kind of stuff places a strain on departments as for the larger proportion of people not there for CS, it displaces the needs of those genuinely there to learn CS as an academic subject. When there is a strain, it degrades the standards; something I've been observing more by the year. That's one of the oppositions I have with the narrative. Computer Science isn't about computers, it's fundamentally about computation and is a mathematical science. It's usually already too late by high school as many "CS" courses in high school do not refer to themselves as programming courses, just as "CS" courses (despite having next to no CS content in them). I'm completely for giving people the OPTION to learn how to code in school. However the age and type of programming is something up for debate, as well as it depends on the aptitude of the teachers. Many schools barely can get Maths education right, and this stuff builds on Maths education. Heck if they made it mandatory in high school to have a computer class that mixes typing with some programming, sure, but don't call it CS. A tech literacy class could be helpful if it had these skills. The last thing we need are a bunch of people thinking they understand what they're doing when they're not and flooding employment markets claiming they know CS. CS has been pigeon-holed unfortunately in a lot of universities to be "that place the coders go", when there are equally many great vocational schools/colleges that offer programming lessons. If somebody wants to learn how to program for free (for the purposes you're describing), there are many many options; many great books (this has been the case since the late 90's) and online tutorials.
@The Eclectic Dyslexic, what you've described is a similar experience to what I've had both as an instructor and a TA, especially in a growing fashion in the last few years especially. It is both concerning and something that hurts me a bunch as an educator and somebody that wants students to pick at my brain. There is an overall trend with grades over substance (this is generally the case with uni students), that is a part of it but also I have been noticing that the standards have been lowering; mostly due to strain and also to avoid conflict and having to deal with administrators. Many CS departments do not have as much gate-keeping of who passes and who fails as other science/math departments. For example, I was TAing a course for maybe 3-4 years at this point and have watched a course turn into one with full blown closed-book exams to one where they let students have double-sided 8.5x11 inch "cheat sheets" for their "closed-book" exams (these unfortunately are not decisions I'm allowed to make). Meaning they don't need to remember anything if they put all the notes in 8 point font. While I understand the "learning strategy" it really takes away the closed-book nature of these kinds of exams. This is an example among many. Little things like that really concern me as nobody seems to want to hold anybody else accountable and whenever you do, you're the "bad" person. I've been watching the standards of writing, reasoning, and comprehension with students slip worse by the year. The students that make it worth it are those that ask questions, and obviously are attentive. However, I find the number of those smaller in number; it varies term to term, but I'm not optimistic about the future. I especially say this as a theory guy, the areas that tend to be the worst "victims" in this whole thing as they're both "not sexy" and "unpopular" among many students "that don't want to be there". It gives the departments little incentive to maintain them or even offer some that aren't mandatory (or even cut them or merge them). This should be obviously concerning as theoretical computer science is the foundation and bedrock of the field.
I think most people go into programming thinking it's about learning a programming language. The thing is, the demand is so high that they may learn a language, call themselves a programmer and be successful. This is a problem because it leads to poorly written software and poorly written software has become the norm. I would argue digital security is a subject everyone should study (somewhat related to programming).
Programmers with high salary are the person who keep learning, has common sense, good logical thinking and creative ppl, in every industry, this kind of ppl are highly paid
Especially scratch. You can find good projects that are good but everything is filled with trash platformers for views and likes that you don't even get money for
I would be very happy to see more abstract logic based subjects taught at schools in general. The very basics of programming should be taught to everyone. It could just be (half) a semester: give everyone a IDE and a Python env and let them solve first a few exercises and finally a simple project. Had this happened to me at school, I would have been hooked much earlier. Give a proto-nerd an IDE and a Python env, and he can directly go on to experiment with web scrawling, machine learning or creating a website. It would lower the barrier of entry drastically.
Absolutely amazing video. Being an avid programmer I definitely agree with every point made in this video. In fact, I myself see the push happening nowdays and the rapid promotion of programming, and it simply doesn't make sense cause not only does it make it harder for people actually interested and proficient in comp sci to get a job, but creates a pool of people not interested or proficient and devalues the field
I believe coding will be divided in two tiers in the future. Visual programming and linear programming. Even today, it's possible for non-techies to do stuff only programmers were able to do. As a basic example, take websites. It takes around 5 months to be proficient with Wordpress and some basic customization, but it takes 3 years of learning how to code to achieve the same result. BUT, as soon as Wordpress break something, you need to call a programmer. That's how I see the future. I see programs that democratize the creation of content on the web, like wordpress but for everything (bubble.is another example, webflow, appypie, buildbox, gamemaker, ecc). So creating digital content will not be a skill of programmers only. But programmers will be the doctors of the web. So, everyone can do everything, but when something bad happen, you call the doctor. For the internet, you call the programmer. So, I see a bright future for programmers, since they will be paid a lot more (if my Wordpress site breaks I will pay anything to have it back on track), but I see a lower demand. That's just my two cents.
McCoder - diamonds and rocks aren't interviewed by someone who can't tell the difference. And yes, it is on them. Too often than not, hiring managers don't know how to interview for developers. They will look at a resume with 7 years of experience and drawing a conclusion that experience is equivalent to competence. Your naivety on the subject isn't founded from bad logic, as I thought much like you did before I experienced what it was like to work in the industry. There are "bad" developers everywhere for a multitude of reasons, and it is very hard to tell who is who in a 30 minute interview, but plain as day to see in the first code-review before a code merge.
Well if you're a programmer obviously you're going to agree that less competition is good. You're a biased party. You can't speak for the interests of the dispassionate people who could benefit from learning the skill.
I'd even say there's a layer above that. The layer of a programmer who's technically skilled enough to do all that doctoring if neccesary, but also create and maintain long lasting applications that run for instance on the web, but also run on the navigation computer of a sea ship. That programming skill combined with a business insight for what is actually valueable and what isn't with the capability to communicate it is where there's a real demand I think. Because these people can tell you in a second or two of your idea is feasible with a given amounth of money, discuss and refine your idea and are actually also able to execute it.
@@depression_isnt_real do you not realize the potential programming has? You could so many things , it's just amazing. I don't see why anyone could hate programming.
and after you checked the lines 4617 times and spent 12 hours searching the error, reading the full code, all the warnings were because of a coma missplaced ...
Yeah, but think of all those high-paying SF jobs you won't be able to get taxed at 80% for! (Fed+state) Like, seriously, what's the point of living if you can't be a tax slave that lives in a glorified toolshed that has a fuckhuge property tax and is surrounded by places that charge 15 bucks a lb. for basic ass vegetables?
@Rxbyg Dug I would hope so. I filed a corporation with Nevada for the express purpose of write-offs and other benefits. But FUCKKKKKK San Francisco. Those houses are glorified cabinets on over-priced landfill with stupidly expensive property tax. I repeat, FUCK San Fran. Okay to visit, NOT okay to live or work in. Oh yeah and their gun laws are retarded. Another reason Nevada is better. The only places worth buying in California are ones where there aren't any people around for miles-- ones where there is no house on it and you have to build your own. At that point, all their insanely over-reaching shitty laws won't touch you, because you're simply just too far away and they have several dozen million junkie VD carrier libtards to deal with.
purpleravenstar Don’t hate lol. I’ve lived in SF till I was 19, best experience of my life. SF is experience as fuck now, but Seattle is just as great and much more affordable so no big deal 👌
@Symon Seattle literally has the worst property tax rate in the entire U.S.A. I think there's a lot of teens and early 20s that have their parents pay for things and don't notice this kind of stuff, or how these things make everything else more expensive, but once you get older, you'll probably notice. You'll notice how business that have to pay all this shit close more often, charge more, etc. You could call it 'trickle up theory', whereby, all the money goes to the state, Stalin-style. You'll notice how much of your money continually gets THROWN AWAY to a landlord just to keep you from living under a bridge, because life in these Democrat-run shit holes is so expensive that you will die 5 times over before you can afford a house! If you become a businessman like me, then you'll avoid the traps, but still despise them. The libertarians are right. This government needs a major downsizing. I've been through those pretty little government zones. Bronze and marble statues, wooden art pieces hanging from the ceiling, fountains, expensive ass experimental architecture, buildings made entirely of window panes and high-grade steel alloy, buildings made entirely of reinforced concrete, etc. That's where your money goes. Monuments to government overtaxing and overspending. Meanwhile, so many people can barely even afford the rent on their glorified particle board WALK-IN CLOSETS! Why? Taxes. The expenditures get passed down onto you.
As a teacher, I feel basic programming and coding skills should be implemented in schools through science or math classes. The issue lies with the importance and stress of standardized exams. Less exams and more necessary courses
As an electrical engineer the extent of my programming knowledge is knowing universal language and copying and pasting libraries into arduino software lol
@@DoctorWhoNow01 It really depends on what field you want to focus in. As for general curriculum we never went super in-depth with programming and it's basically just there so we know what we're looking at if we're collabing with a comp sci/computer engineer. As for circuit analysis and design the basic concepts are pretty straightforward but the reality of the situation becomes increasingly more complicated as more variables get added. The difficulty is in having a very strong understanding of your fundamentals so you can adapt to different different problems rather than attempting to memorize one of the billions of different possible configurations a problem might present itself to you. Namely, the electrical engineering curriculum is very math and physics intensive, and you will be taking many of the the same classes that math and physics undergrads take. In the curriculum having good algebra skills is very important for getting high marks, although the most important thing is knowing the fundamentals like the back of your hand because concepts just keep building off of one another and the material will seem impossible to learn if you aren't solid with the material its building off of. Lots of people struggle with EE and so is regarded as one of the hardest engineering disciplines along with chemical engineering but I think it's more because it's just different than it is objectively harder than other disciplines. It's more abstract and mathematical because you don't see the moving parts as say a civil engineer would. This also means it can be frustrating to troubleshoot a circuit that doesn't give a desired output becuase of maybe one slight problem or because your transistor you're using is fried. It's a test of organization and patience a lot of the time, IMO.
Teachers are actually underpaid. Don't give that 'Passion' bullshit. Money isn't the driving force behind a job, but the pay has to justify staying there. Most people hear about a Teacher's salary, and walks away. The price of school makes it not worth it. You can have the feeling of being a teacher by getting any other job that can require you train others for. Doesn't have to be students, in which half of them have no interest in paying attention to you.
gredangeo Yeah America is fucked. My dad is a maths teacher in high school here in Australia, he earns 90k AUD or 70k USD, which is average for a teacher here.
If you are really excited to do that, then you would do fine. I’m a software engineer intern, and I found out that software is not really my thing. Im currently getting my BS in Computer Engineering, and I’m actually more interested in the electrical part of CompE, like circuit modeling and other things not really software related.
Well in my college it is different (I think so), I have seen the subjects and there's a lot of math, physics and programming. Also computer architecture, electronic things, algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI).
I'm paid close to 6 figures for my tech job, but programming is a frighteningly small part of my day-to-day workload. Studying CS at university is where I learned to program, but it was the maths and problem solving skills that made me so valuable.
Randall Stephens no. I'm pretty sure it's programming since technology uses programming to operate and that programming requires and teaches the act of logical thinking. I mean, why don't maths teachers be paid the same as you?
Segun you are confusing Mathematicians with Math teachers. Mathematicians earn a ton of money in the industry. Real mathematicians are highly sought after. A math teacher doesn't study the level of mathematics a mathematician does.
The collective knowledge of coding is important though. More programmers might results in a wider pool of knowledge. I saw a comment about Stackoverflow and how integral it has become and I couldn't agree more. I think everyone should learn the basics but not everyone should pursue it as a career.
It's a bit like learning to draw or playing an instrument. Almost everyone can try it, some people who never would've expected it might bring some incredible works into this world, but in the end if you're not passionate about it and not willing to suffer because of it you probably shouldn't try to make it your profession.
Indeed. I find the main value teaching programming offers to people who won't use programming in the future is the logical thinking. If schools focus on teaching logical thinking throughout various classes you'll get more bang for your buck.
Segun Oriola I do get what you mean but for people like my sister they don't connect the dots and notice the patterns and logic in maths. Plenty of people develop logical thinking from getting competent at maths etc. (or just think that way to start with) but some who struggle with maths don't develop it which further impacts their ability to grasp maths etc. I just think there can be a bit more of a push directly for logical thinking and that it will augment other learning.
06kellyjac but the taught in logical thinking is received through learning maths and computer science. It allows you to build the mind set of creating solutions in the most efficient way possible. You can't teach writing without a pen. So you can't teach logical thinking without maths and computer science. Here's an example, if I saw a toy in my path, the logical thing to do is simply pick it up and put it away from my path. But for me to do that, I need to know the concept of what the possibilities are. So like this, If (toy is in path): Then move away Else stand where you are. So as I said, it is inherent in those subjects.
It is not for everyone, but neither is writing a novel or being a scientist or crunching numbers. Nonetheless we all have to learn the basics of this in school. Do we need to learn how to be software engineers? No, but we should be teaching the language and basic logical systems. That is useful to EVERYONE.
not just Ireland, us as well... unfortunately I'm in a way that instead of completely dropping out though I pivoted too M.I.S, though I'm teaching myself python through the help of UA-cam. etc I will be covering sql in the degree with those and some accounting I'll more than likely be fine.
@@ryanc2115 Calculus, Physics, Discret Mathematics, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, Statistics, Algorithms, Compilers and Formal Languages, and so on... the CS is really tough.
6:08 - that is the same thing that happened in india . The supply rise & the sallary fall. Now in every family there is at least 1 programmer. And the sallary is less than govt. Jobs
@@AcceleratorUlz I did not say it wasn`t click bait, I was just saying that the whole video was not an advertisement. If you actually had a brain and looked into the description, you would see that the advertisement at the end did not have any connection whatsoever to the video. Also, from my understanding , it was not click bait. On the title he clearly put "Not everyone should code", which he explained in more detail in his video.
@@AcceleratorUlz Woah there bud, calm down. An advertisement is a public announcement that promotes a product, service, or event. Specifically, trying to explain why someone shouldn't code isn't promotion, so that throws YOUR argument out the window. There was only a snippet of advertisements completely irrelevant to the argument he was trying to make by Google, and the sponsor at the end. Just because it was in the description, that doesn't justify it's non importance as it's something the creator wanted you to know, and clearly not put half assed arguments talking about I watch "Fortnite" videos. In conclusion, what it really comes down to is YOUR stupidity, and can you accept that what you said, is in fact, false?
@@infinitekaister I actually read this, did not expect to see the word "Fortnite", but rather 'Civilization V'. To me THAT did look in fact like promotion, or was it just me?
Extremely high quality video! I am a developer myself and I gotta say most people won't be able to deal with everything that comes with programming. Learning to code in 14 weeks yeah right. You sure can learn a programming language but being able to solve a problem completely on your own might take years of experience. There are million things you should learn just so you are able to brainstorm ideas about possible solutions...
As a batch coder, I've already had a taste of that. But I'd imagine it's leagues harder than using a simple notepad and thinking up a creative way to get numbers and letters to display in a window based on the contents of a file/folder.
D Mack I don't know what batch coders do but there are many programming languages and some are harder than others. Anyway the hardest part is to teach a machine to do what you want it to do.
QueenThoria you can learn a programming language in that time but being able to code is much more than that. Colleges teach us very little of what we'll actually need when we start working.
Many think: Computers are very important and a great tool; so everyone (or at least as many people as possible) should learn to use them properly. This is something I totally agree with. But then they think: well, the best way to achieve this is to teach everyone how to code. That's not only total overkill but also potentially discouraging for people that could benefit from computer skills but are scared by the math...
also it's completely ignoring different aspects of C.S like database and Sql, my mind is that of lists ever since I was a kid, the first time I touch excel it was like magickly easy for me too pick up, then counting things and thinking of running money was my second passion, well needles too say I'm going for a accounting m.is degree which is accounting with sql, and a little of coding( though I'm not a big fan of coding.)
But he definitely should. We need more people with content this high-quality and with arguments this well thought-out. (I might not have agreed with the arguments, but his other videos especially are REALLY good.)
Most programming is actually more like basic math. Most people just suck at math, period. I’m reminded of a saying: “There are only three really hard things in programming: naming things and off by one errors”
Katar Advance math is by far more creative than plain boring coding... It's like a Symphony of beautiful abstract structures and amazing ideas. The best part of programming is the algorithmic content, which has a mathematical nature. Learn more...
I’m from a third world country. A friend of mine went to the US to study computer science he graduated and is now a writer 😄. He said he doesn’t care about computers and just did it because that’s what his dad wanted. Imagine spending all that money ,as an international student for that matter, and nothing comes of it?
@@MrStylesp9 That dude.. Damn... But actually.. Everyone is locked in that kind of concept. If your parents dont force you to learn uninteresting stuff, the school will do it surely ;) I mean.... Who is using math in life other than calculating the fucking price of the choclate bar you want?
1. Specialization is important 2. Learning to program does not guarantee a 6-figure job because it’s not everyone’s cup of tea 3. Not every important subject should be taught in school (?)
So I am in my bachelor (Netherlands) for computer science. And I agree with the programming part but I disagree about the way of thinking. Ever since I started with programming my look on the world changed. Why? Not the programming itself but it is the way of dealing with a problem. I think the problem solving part should be a required class and not for programming but for average stuff. After some time you can see things more critically and start solving problems for more directions and not just your personal need.
I've watched many videos on yt that said you can learn coding and get a job without a degree, is that right though? And referring to the video and the comments i see that basically the coding part is the tool easy to learn and the programming part is the actual job which is learned by experience? Like it's problem solving referred to the client's needs? I'm soon gonna start college and these videos about self teaching coding and actually getting a job made me feel like paying college and learning computer science there isn't worth it and that i have to change my major and I'm kinda stuck here though i love topics about coding and programing , can you tell me anything since you probably finished college? Is it worth it or not? Do you think you're able to learn what you took in college alone?
Problem decomposition and basic logic are great skills for just about any trade. I went into software development from a corporate finance background and just that skillset alone really made the transition easier. But yeah, its not for everyone.
@@nightfury8848 depends, can you learn coding, design webpages and stuff? Absolutely. But comp sci is more than that, you learn a lot of discrete math, computational and automata theories which are applied to more complex fields like Artificial intelligence, machine learning and so on. Think of programming like applied mathematics, anyone can do math but the field is so much more than what you see at surface level.
@@kindredspirit9544 actually a couple of days ago i watched videos on the math you take in computer science and yes it is not that math you take in school, i saw somethings like the graph theory and other thing that are actually very complex but very satisfying and now i see computer science like more of a way to discover the key to simplify stuff by making a general equation to it, there might be more into it obviously judging by how little I've watched about that topic and it's actually so satisfying and so fulfilling yet so complex for a beginner like me
@@kindredspirit9544 it was really fascinating when i firsted watched it and tried to actually understand it , it's like a way to crack a code of something and it's so satisfying to actually get actually good and true results
Before I started using all my extra time to work on UA-cam videos, I was trying to learn to code. I heard a lot of people talking about how coding will be the future's "blue collar" job. If that is true, then as you said, the salaries will inevitably drop. I still think it is a valuable skill to learn, and one I hope I will have time for again in the future, but certainly not essential.
FutureNow Which language did you try? I fiddled around Java for a few months when I worked in IT recruitment and wanted to stop feeling inferior to all those guys my age I talked to on a daily basis. I've forgotten most of the basics by now but I'm pretty sure I could relearn them easily if I wanted to. I think I gave up somewhere past the loops, I just couldn't get them to work if they got any more complicated.
FutureNow problem with self teaching is that no matter how good you become, no company is going to hire you as a programmer if you just walk in without a degree. Its only good if your learning to code as a means yo some end like making an app, game etc. I could be wrong about this tho I doubt it
yarpen26 if you were still just learning about loops then you were still just learning the very basics... Anyways when I thought myself to program, Java was the first language I learnt. It's not the easiest to start with but it's not the hardest either...
natty_the_great Thats just wrong. Go to Quora or the programming subreddits on Reddit, there are plenty of people who have developer jobs who don't have a degree or a computer science degree. The demand is so high for *good* software developers that companies will take you if you can show them you have skill, regardless of whether or not you have a degree. Besides, if the degree is so important, all those coding bootcamps wouldn't be so popular since you don't graduate with a degree anyways.
natty_the_great Regardless of how much you know, you probably can’t enter a company in a field like this without them training you as a new employee and “catching you up to speed” on the more obscure parts of the language that they use. Programming languages are often so vast with so much documentation for a person to be familiar with all of the less common, more obscure applications. Showing that you have learned programming, at least on a base level, might indicate that you are responsive to training.
I don't want a career in programming, but I'm glad I spent a good portion of my younger years learning how to code. I love problem solving and programming was a great way to develop that skill. That's why I really loved doing it. It started with Scratch and soon developed into Java, Python, Basic, etc. In each stage there were points when I was frustrated because I couldn't solve a bug/error, but the satisfaction of fixing it was worth banging my head against the wall for a couple of hours. So, while it's not the only avenue, coding can be a great way to develop problem solving skills and critical thinking. It's also just fun to create things. And I think something that's unique to my experience was that I was able to find a community through it. Great video, dude!
*Matheuzoid Gameplays* While I don't know what his answer would be, I hear that after enough time being in the field, it is that very feeling of solving problems that starts to become cumbersome. You no longer want to sit and bang your head angst the wall each and every single day. You no longer want to think to that same capacity. Eventually, you want something that's a bit more relaxed and repetitive, and CS can't give you that in the ling run. This is just what I've heard, though, not my own experience.
There's a lot of truth to that. A lot of jobs are the same day in, and day out. You know what to expect every day. With programming, I have a general sense of what I'll be working on next week. But a month or two from now? No idea. And every day brings a new set of challenges, so there's a lot of uncertainty. That can cause some anxiety over time.
Akram, not true. After programming for at least 6 months you should be able to solve mostly everything and probably after around a year wouldn't even be making mistakes.
SkillShare link is skl.sh/polymatter4 - I was kinda amazed to find out Kurzgesagt (In a Nutshell) has a SkillShare course on animation :o
PolyMatter - Hi, can you please add in closed captionings for this video , thank you!
PolyMatter how you make these videos
Lol, that seamless blend into the Skillshare ad was brilliant. :)
I disagree with this video. Learning code isn't about the job you get. Sure that's nice, but that's not why people should learn to code. Also the "critical thinking skills" line is just a line. Coding might teach that, but not as much as other things. If coding teaches basic cognitive skills, it's an understanding of algorithms.
The real reason everyone should learn to code is the same reason anyone who owns a car should know how to change a tire and a few other basic auto maintenance skills. The same reason everyone who owns a home should know basic home repair.
Everyone doesn't have to be fluent in multiple programming languages but having a loose familiarity with a few of the most common can help people understand how the computerized layer of society works.
Most important, mass teaching of code to young people will help that generation be more accepting of technological change and less likely to become neoluddites when automation takes over. They'll have a basic understanding of the logic structures automation is built on and the engineering behind the machines, and that will hopefully avoid having any new John Henry wannabes.
PolyMatter I totally disagree with u on this video, I think just like u learn maths and science, u should also learn coding, just at a later stage. With that said, I agree totally with that 60 minutes class bit
I smelled Skillshare from a mile away.
Devansh Kamdar ikr? Lol
Even from half of the video I just knew it
Devansh Kamdar
It’s just that type of video
I guessed brilliant ngl
-1.61 km-
"Everyone should code!"
- Tech companies that know that more programmers means lower wages
"Not everyone should code!"
- The programmer who knows that less programmers means higher wages
eventually it will happen
@Confidential Name
Please take your meds next time.
@Confidential Name machine translation is notoriously awful, you can only use google translate or others for everyday shit, but if you wanted to translate books or other things where the language is more nuanced you still need a human translator. We're still very very far off from the future where machines can take over complex jobs like translation and programming
@Confidential Name well, yes we got an AI which can do some basic stuff. but they can't replace the job completely, because we can't trust it the same as a human. To ride wit auto-piolt you still have to be ready that the program will make a mistake and ride yourself. It will take long time until we get a trustworthy AI, and more until we get complex AI which can take a complex job on it's own.
A
@@rodrigozanabria2978 Google Translate is not the benchmark and hasn’t been for a long time. Professional translators use machine translations to do the majority of the work for them. They just go through and tidy things up afterwards.
coding is basically:
> stackoverflow;
> trying to find the error on line 32;
> stackoverflow;
> dealing with MS office BS when trying to present your product to the customer;
> stackoverflow;
> indian youtuber showing the error you're trying to solve;
> stackoverflow;
Eduardo Rezende wow this is quite accurately me last semester 😂😂😂
And a lot of mdsn
Don't be like Eduardo, this is how spaghetti happens.
*sTaCk OvErFlOw*
Lmao dude like 75% of programming videos on youtube are made by indian ahahah
Don’t learn to code so I can get a job with less competition, thank you
You can also learn to code and get a job with less competition.
web development sure has a lot of competition, but other areas such as database administration or data mining have much less competition
Facts 😂
But I’m actually interesting in learning how it works. The “high salary” is just a bonus.
@@rahel7443 :)
Everyone wants to be a programmer until they have to program
Yep that’s true,
Yeah, I remember when I first started out and holy shiii that sucked a ton because I was learning Python v3, HTML, and PBASIC all at once while learning hard ware engineering.
omfg this hit. this hit like a truck. wth am i doing here, with pycharm opened in the background and a program to be made. I'm so predictable...
Edit: 11 months late I’m a failure and the program was never made. Haven’t coded in months. Also severely depressed. Gg boiiiis
You are right
It was the opposite for me.
I only started to like programming when I first tried it at uni. Before that I thought it would just be really tedious and boring
*Weird bug in code*
Me: Right, guess I'll try look for that...
*Half an hour passes*
Me: OHHHH, I wrote a 2 instead of a 4...
I had a couple of those issues last week...
Toxic Pixel Media
That’s exactly why I looked this video up lol
The lifestyle of a programmer
I once suffered through a glitch in my code for months before finding that I had typed 1 (as in "one") instead of l (lower case L)
Once i did a loop for(x=0;y
roses are red;
violets are blue
i forgot a semi-colon;
on line number 2;
relatable
why do we even need semicolons?
Is it java?
@@xexpaguette its to tell the computer that you've finished this "sentence", its like a period or full stop but for computers
Imagine using semi-colons
- this post was written by python gang
@@praxition1416 lol
Not everyone should code
*Recommended for you*
Wait what...
Ha! now I know before i try
Right when I searched up why coding tutorials are confusing.. I'm still going to try to make a small game, just with less code
same
I’ve been thinking the same thing as the video so I’ll take it as confirmation that I’m right.
Press F
That moment when you realize that the whole video was just an ad for Skillshare.
I had to roll down too much to find this.
*The end of this video includes a paid sponsored promotion. This company had no part in the writing, editing, or production of the rest of the video
@@TheP0lix yes. Way more than i expected
FlappyPhantom
I can understand why you would think that...If this is the first Polymatter video. But I think your opinion would change after you viewed some of Polymatter’s other videos. If anything, I think Skillshare should be given kudos for recognizing a high production value video with a highly relevant topic to buy ad placement.
IM not complaining
"Coding" can be everyone's basic skill. "Programming"? Good luck coping with that.
You know how to speak English but writing a good book is not an easy job.
hard to argue with this
That's a really good analogy
True.
A perfect comparison between just "coding" and actually "bringing a product to market". A big difference!
The "art of programming" involves solving actual problems, by mastering the platform's hardware and software capabilities and its limitations. So yeah, there's a lot more to programming than just banging out some code on the keyboard, from using web API's effectively to creating a compelling UI's, captivating graphics, great music, etc, etc. Otherwise everybody would be a Stephen King or James Patterson of writing, but it's the content you write not just a bunch of words.
I always say to my non-coding friends that a coder is someone who can write code; a programmer is someone who knows how to fix their code, to plan their code, and to market their code.
programming in movies: *I JUST BREACHED THE MOST SECURE FIREWALL AND HACKED INTO THE WHITE HOUSE BANK AND CRASHED THE STOCK MARKET AND BLEW UP THE ISS*
programming in real life: oh i forgot to close my for loop
Oh i forgot ;
rayan its not numbers its binary and computer programming is just computer language and it aint easy
rayan im a computer programmer and a robot programmer you only see it on movies that is just numbers use some brain ok it aint easy do you think its easy it can take a week even months or years you little shit
@@fbi_2rex489 If your a computer and robot programmer you should be smarter. Realise that rayan is referring to how it looks in movies not in real life "you little shit"
@@fbi_2rex489 Hey bro, I know you misunderstood, but he meant the scrolling 1s and 0s is in movies. You know like the matrix.
As a programmer myself, I'm in favor of schools teaching basic programming skills as a mandatory course, but not so that everybody can become a programmer. Rather, I think that so much of our world is run on code that it's important to "demystify" it.
And also basic programming skills would be basic algorithms and logic, which can be useful for non-programmers. So win-win anyway
And a communication aid. In my software engineering major in college, we needed to take computer architecture so we can kinda talk with the hardware guys. And the it security branch has basic economics as a mandatory course so they can talk with business people
I was taught how to write programs etc when I was about 12, stopped after a while, now I'm doing it again at 17
yes just like basic science is taught, which makes us understand how things works, coding should be taught to teach how programs work since they are very much integrated in our life now
I think it's useless. I mean how many kids complain about having to do maths and science? They forget everything after they graduate anyway. There's no point teaching these subjects to people who aren't interested. Basic maths and science should be taught but everything else is useless for the average person who isn't smart enough nor interested enough to do any of these type of subjects. Imagine forcing the average high school kid to learn coding on top of science and maths, they'd hate it
If you throw a stone in India it is more likely to hit a software engineer than any normal person
Priyanka Shukla software engineering is the “normal”
Don’t woooosh me
Indian guys on youtube are savers tho
Well that line was a Student and in a particular area but it's still somewhat accurate. Let me remember it was from a series Kota factory
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I once worked with an Indian programmer with an "advanced" Computer Science degree that could barely get around their own computer.
We all love programming until we hit that bug we can't figure out, that's when I start contemplating switching majors to art.
That is exactly the thing. It's about that point in time. If you really love programming, you wouldn't be budged so easily by one or two bugs giving you a hard time.
@@goji5887 agree with that
@@goji5887 Me: working 6 hours to fix three bugs that turned into 10 then 106 then finally fixed those sons of bitches
Agreed this is a patience game it can be very fun if you are logical and love extreme puzzles like how you can't get something to work and you test tons and tons of ideas and theories that fail but if you love the career you just want that satisfaction of finally getting it done without bugs or errors then all those hours were worth it for that satisfaction.
Lol, I had a bug where instead of comparing string sizes, I compare the string directly. ( in C++ ) took me a while to figure out the problem
I hit my desk so hard because of a bug in my code. (Hole in my desk now) later found it was a typo
Like seriously i made a skillshare joke 2 years ago and people STILL argue here wth is wrong with you guys
Same
same
I mean that's how he earns money. Just keep it running while you read the comments instead.
Why should someone make money for annoying people with useless, biased information? This type of advertising completely devalues the credibility of anything this channel says. It means that this channels producers don't have the integrity to distinguish between paid content and neutral information and sucker people into watching their ads.
If you don't like the content: don't watch the ads. If you do and would like to support the creator; then leave the ads running. Everything you see is biased, doesn't mean it's useless. Far from it.
Programming is like cooking. Not everybody should be a chef, but basic cooking skills are incredibly useful in life, and it's the same for basic scripting and programming.
Basic cooking skills aren't necessarily "useful", considering there are many fast food places that will sell you food for extremely cheap. Sure, your lifespan will probably decrease incredibly if you continue to eat fast food over and over, but that's what it's like for the average person.
@@asciidude It's very useful. Unless you live in an area with a culinary scene like Singapore, it'll almost always be both cheaper and healthier to cook on your own, hence why almost everyone does.
@@asciidude so, basic cooking skills arent "necessarily useful" since it just "decreases my lifespan"?
@@planefan082 I'm not so sure about cheaper, but I'm also 15. I just assumed it was cheaper for fast food rather than making your own - after what I've heard from peoples experiences.
@@fatir004 I believe there are ways to "regain" that lifespan without spending money. I may be wrong
Do you know what our teacher calls "computer science"? Microsoft word and excel🤦♂️😂
really??
@@name-eo1lv yep
Basically how people stereotype computer studies. Like a programmer in movies is seen typing 10 buttons in 3 seconds and hacked something.
Because you solve your problem on word or excel 🤣
my sides
Me while coding: omg this is so complicated I wanna quit.
Also me when I finished a simple program: PSH this is so EASY I can do this ALL DAY
Lolololololol same
print("hi")
I'M AMAZING AT THIS!
True that, there's just no inbetween!
Made a simple snake java
"Wow i wanted to make cyberpunk fortnite etc"
- some minecraft fortnite epic gamer hit rapper and artist dababy uncle
me when i first completed my 'hello world' program
i feel jealous of those elementary kids learning about coding in school, reminds me of how older people told me they felt about not knowing how to use a computer
samee
same
I learned to code at a young age, but I think programming is a boring job. Coding is easy to learn though. Im pursuing an entertainment design career which takes a lot more work to learn, but it’s a cool job.
@@Purplesquigglystripe what made you decide on that instead?
I learned in fourth grade but forgot because I don’t have my own computer at home so now I’m trying to learn it again
The way he introduced Skillshare was so smooth it made the whole video look like an ad.
Thats Because it is an ad
Should most kids learn to program: meh.
Should most kids learn fundamental skills like typing and logic puzzles: yes.
Typing and logic puzzles help with programming 100%, when you program you'll be trying to solve errors and be creative quickly
@@Omar-te1pp yep and the languages and technologies used in programming today often won't be used when those kids become adults but math and logic skills will still carry over
@@youngsuit I agree 100%
@@youngsuit yeah but the more technologies you use the more easier you gotta learn something new and become good at it
Very agree. If only they did that so I can know how to make effecient and non buggy ai.
I agree, everyone should be a
*pro* at *grammar*
Was searching for this one xD Wish I could make the same 'joke' in german, but it simply doesn't work xD
LMAO
I also love how you didn't capitalize.
James Hall Capitalisation isn't grammar, grammar is part of the structure of the language, not necessarily how it's written. Without capitals, it still makes grammatical sense, and in the same way too; therefore to omit a capital is not a grammatical mistake here.
@@aislingoda6026 Oh.
Not everyone can make that smooth ad transition effect.
RoboMex TV 😂😂😂
...but that's why you need a Skillshare account. Sign up in the next month to receive !
I didn’t even notice it when I started scrolling through the comments.
How about, instead of "everyone should code", "everyone should understand how computers work?" In the same way we should have a rudimentary knowledge of a wide array of subjects to help us thrive in complex societies.
Yeah that's what education is, but unfortunately people are way too uninterested in actually learning and just want the 'essentials'
computers are probably the only tech that people expect to use without acquiring any skill or knowledge
@@martinkunev9911 I know right. Imagine if there was no driving licence.
My grandfather is beginning to succumb to dementia, he's had his driving licence taken away for the good of his health. But he's still using his computer, and it's costing him thousands as he falls into scam after scam. It's heartbreaking.
This is more of a problem for boomers. Most people learn about computers by using them since they're so common nowadays.
even that's a little complex when you dive in deeper, most kernals are made in c/c++, you know how memory in them works? Its kinda complex ngl, 2 data structures, Stack and Heap and it also has many other parts. What is a 8-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit integer? 8-bit integers contains 8 bits, 1 bit either contains 0 or 1, then there is signed and unsigned integers. 8-bit integer ranges from -127 to 127 (for signed integers), and no, its not memorized there's a formula for it, 2^n-1 in positive and (2^n-1)-1 in negative, in unsigned integers it ranges from 0 to 256, formula, 2^n. Wanna know how images are displayed? they are 3d arrays, or 2d matrix. How gpu helps? it deals with Graphics or whats displayed on the screen, so they need to be VERY good at matrix opperations.
Programming also teaches patience, when you can’t solve a problem you go through multiple possible solutions, which can take hours.
And we developers do love estimations!
Agreed. I think it also teaches thinking about increasing possible outcomes by increasing one’s associative-thinking.
Programming also teaches patience, waiting for free assets xD
*which can take days
I think just being alive teaches you patience, like having to wait days for it to Friday afternoon 😢
I swear the best thing I made in a program was a Mike wazowski sprite that endlessly chased a shrek sprite.
Everyone after opening scratch
bruh share it 😂
Mine is probably a 100kb text editor
You cannot just tell us this without sharing it with us
I want it
Not everyone should go to SkillShare either
Lol.
He's just advertising it because he needs some money to keep making vids.
Making video's is free
Someone Random But he needs money. If he doesn’t make money than why do this?
Thank you. Found it a bit ironical that he kinda criticised online courses that teach you coding in 14 weeks and then advertises for one...
Tech Companies: "Everyone should learn how to program."
Also Tech Companies: "Increased demand. Decreased supply. Awesome. We pay everyone less."
It's like everyone should making money themself, so there's no more poor peoples anymore
@@yp4279 ...dude what
Tech companies will ofcourse focus for their profit
When you open UA-cam determined to learn coding and this vid pops up on your recommended videos -_-
@Winston Mcgee how do you learn outside of youtube. Google?
Technically you can learn "programming" just off of UA-cam since plenty of people make great videos on different programming languages. You can also learn computer science, but there aren't that many good videos.
@My Leg Guy at school -.-
@Winston Mcgee I'm learning coding from youtube, like a lot. Also, it IS "coding". This is a natural course language took, not like the tens of new pronouns being thought of each day and made to be acknowledge, coding is understood, you stupid fuck.
@@John-kx9zj you can buy books though
"The most important class was debate" that's debatable.
The most important class is java
edit: no one got my joke
Honestly, debating also gives a huge impact on my life
@@nathanzotov1160 Can you explain my peanut brain doesnt understand
@@chopinfrederic5040 in Java, every piece of code needs to reside inside a "class".
"A point of view about a debatable topic"
I'm a software engineer and make more than my girlfriend who is an attorney. We're both fairly young though.
nice
She needs to do patent law
In my experience, programmers hit the cap much faster than other majors.
Attorneys have jobs only because thre law is intentionally confusing.
Cool story
I've been programming for 40 years, professionally for 31. I have a BS and MS in CS. I have never, ever, ever "solved complex mathematical problems". Unless, of course, "mathematical problems" is defined in some novel equivocal way. I agree programming is harder than 14 weeks, but I'm not sure our host has really explained Why it is.
I was looking for this comment. I was thinking the same thing.
Alright grandpa, we heard you. Lets just go to sleep already
"solving complex mathematical problems" is more for FAANG coding interviews than the work itself imo
@@hil449 even for faang, most of the time, you wont complex math interviews, its mostly data structures and algorithms. math heavy question might appear in fintech interviews or competitive programming afaik and of course some esoteric research fields or industries.
@@cjhohd2601 lol why do him like that
Everyone should code to me sounds like an attempt to flood the market n lower the pay for programmers n devs over time
Naͣfiͥsaͣhͪ Oury Bah true
Their wage should be lowered. They earn too much for not a lot of work.
Coding and programming are 2 different things of the same topic. Coding is translation, programming is the languages themselves.
mike b
Why should they be lowered “not working hard” isn’t an argument
@@mikeb4471 let me guess, you don't know anything about programming / software engineering and are just salty because you have to work 10 hours a day in a job that mostly is about physical work?
The best Things about Programming is the feeling when you finaly solve a problem after some hours of troubleshooting!
I love that!
Minewalker Animations And the best things about policing is the feeling when you finally solve a problem after hours of shooting
Joking no hate pls
Completely disagree, the best thing about programming is when you have spent 6 hours building a system without ever running it, and everything works the first time you run it! :D
oh sheet can't relate that's like programming goals
Shaygah Hendricks Same xD I have yet to code for five hours without testing. Who does that?
I don't think that's just exclusive to programming as in you will def feel like heaven when you finally solve a problem you were agonizing with for hours.
Not to mention that salaries won't stay high if there's a glut of programmers in the market
It was mention brah.
thats why you should get into machine learning, not everyone can code a learner
Jacques Francois Yep. Look at the AAA game development industry. Lots of people want to make games so that drove the salary of a game dev down to $40,000 on average despite the bad conditions and extra long hours.
You know that pressure you feel to work harder and longer right before a deadline? Now imagine doing that all the time instead of just during crunch time.
I believe salaries for truly talented people would remain the same, it would just be harder to find them.
Market allready flooded by coders.
I truly believe that you don"t know if "programming is for you" or not until you're in too deep to back down, and that goes for most skills. So, in my opinion, everyone who is curious should at least give it a shot, and making it a school subject could provide an outlet for that.
Half of India has a degree in Software Engineering.
and they all suck at it
@@altcapright9114 Not all ...around 95%
Based on my shitty math skills thanks to me learning to code and not learn real math, I estimate that's about ... a fairly decent percentage of the world.
@@altcapright9114 Maybe you don't know the real programmers in India. Don't look for cheap stuff in the first place!
I have been in programming field since I was 8, I am still rookie as I spent time on many other stuffs, but I can assure that Indian programmers mostly are not good. I am Indian by the way
Before you start your journey to learn programming, ask yourself, if the pay wasn't so high, would you still want to learn it? That's your answer.
Muhaimin Zulkarnain I tried to learn it, and before i watched this video, didn’t realize the pay was high for average employee. So yes or no?
@@alexwang982 Go find out how does it feel
@@alexwang982 A lot of people start to learn how to code, then give up halfway. There are also a bunch of people who learned how to code, finish it, but then has no idea what to do next. To answer your question, try making something. Create. Do a project. Build your own website or build an app or program a game. Learn it, then apply what you've learned. That's the only way to know if it's for you or not. I started learning how to code because I wanted to build an app. So my learning process was centered around that. It helped me understand the process better. Have a goal. Don't learn for the sake or learning. Apply what you learn.
If I wasn't paid, I wouldn't do any job.
@@skycloud4802 that's true but if the job paid less, say $60k average,.would you still do it? You're still getting paid, just not as much.
Who has told you that programming is as important of a skill as reading & writing?
Agreed. For most fresh graduates, what they only know about the IT industry is programming.
But it's so much more than that. Project managers, support resources, line managers keep the business running.
I think that you need to read to be able to code... at least understanding some of the words will help dramatically.
I have difficulty imagining someone who can't read but can code... possible, but not realistic.
ermonski there is a difference between IT and Computer Science
D agreed
Good point. But I wasn't talking about the degree but the industry itself.
Coding is very difficult to learn. However, whats nice is that you only need to learn it once. After that it's incredibly easy to replicate and people still think you're a wizard.
not really. I'm never "done" and unfortunately I don't ever think I will be. I constantly have to learn new tools for different projects.
@@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587
Although when you have a foundation built on data structures and algorithms, language matters less.
@@Demopans5990 this
@@hil449 self
You are no wizard.
These transitions to ads are going to make me buy something
Right? I'm going to buy ads for my business.
Man I hate them so much. There's nothing wrong with them I guess but they feel somehow dishonest or like a breach of trust.
donov25 If it we’re any other UA-camr, I’d have to agree with you. But these ads are at the end of a very informative, concise, and well crafted video. And on top of that, have excellent transitions and are relevant to the video... which is the key point that so many other content creators seem to forget. People put Dyson vacuum ads on car videos and I’m like what the heck?!?
As long as the ads remain relevant and with creative and/or funny transitions, it’s totally fine by me.
Lol true xD
the smoothest of all transition
most of the time your just gonna be googling
why you errored on line 42
coding - 30%
googling - 70%
Reminds me of the joke that programming classes would be renamed to "googling stackoverflow".
stackoverflow is king
@@claudiatje85 I'm learning Python and stackflow so far is my best friend
In my experience it is more like 50% Google, 40% bug fixing and 10% Actual programming
WEBGL makes it 95% Google 5% programming
"Unlike reading and writing, it's too hard for everyone to learn it" I guess few hundreds years ago people would say the same about reading and writing
@jocaguz18 I disagree. Anyone can memorize syntax, but truly understanding programming languages (I say "languages" in plural because most of us know more than one) enough to be able to solve problems with it is not something everyone is capable of. Sure, you can hand some teenagers a PC with Scratch, but if you give them the logic behind a sorting algorithm and tell them to convert that to source code, and most of them wouldn't be able to solve that problem. And that's just something basic.
@jocaguz18 i think you are the one missing the point. Consider the following:
One, your argument that "everyone should code" is flawed when you begin to consider the oppurtunity cost. Learning a language, both programming and natural lanngue, requires a significant time investment that could be spent on other more valuable skills.
Two, unlike natural language, many programming languages and concepts require a certain mindset condusive towards the types of problems encountered by programmers. Recursion and pointers are typically considered the most confusing of programing conscepts for beginers. Amongst my peers, the ones most comfortable with those two concepts and with an innate tallent for comprehending them have become the most adpept programmers within my peer group.
Three, your claim that code is more like english because it is in english is remarkably asinine. I dont think english as a language has pointers, recursion, stacks, queues, loops, and about a dozen different data structures as key concepts to be known and understood before you can even begin to speek it fluently. Even knowing these core concepts there are still dozens of other useful tools and concepts that are required within varius other fields of expertise in computer science. Even between different languages you will find completely different concepts. For example, F# is nothing like C#.
Four, programming can be an incredibly time consuming and mentally exhausting task. Some people are not capable of working like this for extended periods of time. I dont mean they are stupid, but some people just hate this sort of work and would prefer to do something physical. For fucks sake, I ENJOY programming and there are days where want to get the fuck out of the computer lab and never look back after spending over 30 hours in it over the course of two days.
@jocaguz18 No, your point doesn't stand. Coding languages are a means to an end. Unless you're going to learn to build programs and solve problems with it, learning it (or rather, memorizing syntax) is pointless because you gain similar skills from learning regular spoken languages and memorizing other things. It's just as pointless as the fact that we teach high schoolers calculus when most of them will never use it if they don't pursue a degree in a STEM-related field. Calculus teaches you certain skills, yes, but it doesn't teach you how to file your taxes, manage finances, or even be a good person. Same with "coding". If we're gonna add something to the list of essential skills to be taught to everyone, it had better be life skills as opposed to more STEM-based courses that the overwhelming majority of people will never need to know or use in life. As interesting as learning about Nodes and Binary Search Trees was for a nerd like me in college, I wouldn't wish that on anyone who's not already interested in that sort of thing.
@jocaguz18 So because people don't learn Calc in high school where you are, that's suddenly a weakness in my argument? Well news flash, regular (non-STEM) high schoolers in many US school systems do and we don't even have that good of an education system. My argument stating that teaching high schoolers Calc is pointless isn't suddenly invalidated by the fact that high schoolers in some parts of the world don't have to learn it. I didn't say that we teach "all" high schoolers Calc and shouldn't, so I have no idea what you're getting at here by saying that invalidates my argument.
You say I committed a whataboutism fallacy, but you didn't even reference that fallacy correctly. Use the correct fallacy, or run back to r/iamverysmart because this is a comment section on UA-cam. Nobody cares about logical fallacies. Everyone online who thinks they're smart references them as if they're a holy set of rules that should guide every conversation. In reality they're a tool used to create airtight arguments in formal debate or sophisticated discourse, but since you've already resorted to insulting almost everyone here who disagrees with you, this discussion is neither.
If you're accusing me of playing mental gymnastics, I think you should have a look at your display of plaques, trophies, and medals for the sport and be proud. You earned them.
If you want to take this discussion further respectfully, I'm open, but I've noticed that in online interactions if someone brings up logical fallacies, their IQ, or both during a discussion, they're probably completely incapable of respectful discourse and likely lack a lot of self-awareness. I've been unfortunate enough to run into your type a lot online.
@jocaguz18 Lol thanks for confirming my suspicion that you were indeed the exact type I thought you were. Congratulations. A "smart" guy who, even with all of his alleged intelligence, thinks because he's smart enough that he's above the idea of showing basic respect to the people he interacts with. A guy so smart that he lacks basic self-awareness. I've met plenty of them online and every time I find them less intimidating and more hilarious and pitiful.
You got into debate club in high school. Do you want a cookie? We're adults now, or at least I am. You're not gonna get any "cool kid" points for being in debate club when you were in school. That's laughable. This discussion is about what's going on right now, and your debate club membership clearly says nothing about your debate acumen as of now because it didn't change the fact that you're utterly incapable of respectful disagreement without resorting to insults. This just makes your bragging even more hilarious.
"You, at no point, made an argument to explain why it is not a important skill"
This right here shows that your debate club membership means nothing. You don't even understand your opponent's argument. I wasn't making the argument that it wasn't an important skill to have. Obviously I wouldn't think that as a programmer. I was making the argument that it wasn't an important skill for *everyone* to have, and I'd like to point out that you also have yet to prove why it is. And if you learned a single thing from your cute little debate club, you'd realize the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim. You made both the positive claim and the first claim, so the burden of proof is on you to prove it, and not on me to disprove it.
Before you try to look cool and smart throwing logical fallacies into the arena, make sure you actually understand your opponent's argument.
And yes, making the argument that there *are* more important skills is a valid argument to make because I wasn't arguing against the importance of coding as a skill in the first place. If my ship has a 30-foot gash on the left side and a 3-foot scrape on the other, which one should I address first? People shouldn't be learning even rudimentary computer logic before they're taught basic common sense and life skills. Walk before you run.
And no, I don't just "think I'm smart". I don't care about that stuff anymore. There are people who aren't nearly as smart as me (at least in the ways society values) who are still much better people. If more folks cared more about being better people than they did about trying to be pseudo-intelligent and "logical" like your Jordan Petersens and your Ben Shapiros, the world would be in a much better place. Intelligence isn't everything. I know your type because I used to be your type... and then I grew up. :/
I honestly think that if you get into programming without loving it, you're going to hate it. The sheer mental effort that you need to excel at requires passion for the subject, not just "oh, I want to make cash". For example, I love building things. I love making projects. I can easily spend 8-10 hours just programming per day without stopping when I'm working on a product. Would I be able to do it without that passion? Nope. Not at all.
At some point it may become like reading and writing though. Some kids don't like to read, they don't become literary critics in life but they still need to learn how to read. If you don't like math you need not become a mathematician or phycisist, but some exposure is still strongly recommended.
The same will probably apply for programming.
You don't "suddenly" love something for no reason. The more exposure, the more passion or love will grow
@@mitnick212 That's not always the case, the opposite can be true where the more you are exposed to it, the more resent you grow for it. Which can make you miserable. I think what they mean to say is that you need to be interested in it for the sake of coding, not money.
Programming is NOT easy money. It is long hours, and nights of wanting to pull your hair out
@@Karategirl5947 Yes, but people (and corps) make it out to be easy money, just like engineering when it can take real time and effort. That's the problem here. It's creating unfair/unrealistic expectations for people.
I agree to a certain point with this video:
Not everyone should be a professional poet - but everyone should be able to speak the language.
Code doesn't roll off the tongue in the same way poetry does
HappyMan's 2nd Channel - Poetry does not „roll off the tongue”. You confuse the worthless school assignments with a lifework or a poet that is genuinely earning his bread with it.
Real poetry is not less hard than clean purpose programming. I would argue it is even way harder, because you need inspiration for it instead of just using it as a tool.
Yeah, because language is useful outside of poetry. CS, not so much.
There's a difference between being able to code and being able to use a computer, though.
ojkolsrud1 being able to code is also hardy ever useful.
I went into this already disagreeing with the videos thesis. By the end of it you'd countered every point I had, and had convinced me of your stance. Thank you for this, it was quite eye opening
god damn we need more people that are okay with changing their mind when they realize their wrong, thank you
Agreed!
coding is easy, programming is hard.
I still disagree to some extent. I always thought the idea that everyone should become a programmer was rather stupid, but I do think programming as a skill will still be essential. It’s inevitable that most positions will require some form of low level automation. That’s not to say everyone should have formal training in algorithms, but a basic understanding of scripting and such would be useful in almost any profession.
Dafuzz I'd say that we are far enough into the 21st century and the proliferation of smartphones that the average person should never need to write ANY code. In this day and age, if an app from the play store or apple store can't do it, then they would have already hired a programmer by then.
7:30 you've been struck by a smooth advertiser
Abdullah Seraj lmao
Michael jackson
ua-cam.com/video/LDiqNEtf5Ew/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/8D-WVlRohQk/v-deo.html
Hee-hee
Annie isn't ok....
My high school forced students to learn C# and I have to say this video is so right. Nobody ever asked "when are we gonna use this in real life" so often in one class period.
This goes for any class in HS, math, english, science, history, etc. But the point of these is to get students to explore new shit that they're interested in and may pursue that career in further education. Why learn Pythagorean theorem? Well, some dude in your class may be interested in construction, who knows.
Plot twist this whole videos was setup for the skillshare ad
xD
How tf did this // got 252 likes
Cuz is true
jmjuuuujuuujuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuujJuujmuuuuuuuumjujjujmmmmmmjmjjmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjSeiseary jujujuuuuujuuuujuuujuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuujuuuuuuuuuuujujujjujujujuuuujjjjjjuuuuujjjj
xd
I'm not sure how you pull off those ads, my thoughts drift into the video when suddenly wild ad appears. by the time I realize it's there its over. Kudos!
Ashok Madridista they're so good I'm pretty sure they would be illegal in the UK 😂
Squaretable22 lol :D
"everyone learns differently, and at a different pace, and likes different things"
Compulsory high school classes: *im about to end this mans entire career*
That’s basically comprising of trigonometry , algebra , calculus . That’s it right?
Save me from AP comp sci I’m ✨struggling✨
@@srinidhi5592 same
@@hilal_younus no, although each state is different. Mine required 3 years of history, 1 year of economics, one year of financial literacy, 1 year of sociology and psychology, 4 of language arts, 4 of math, 1 of gym, 1 of an additional language, 1 of art or music, and 3 of science
This is why I want to do game design and not just programming. I like sciences and all but I think art just might be what I want.
Dude yes. I've learnt how to code using unity, a game engine I'm sure you've probably heard of. Not only have I learnt how to code but I've developed so many other skills like how to use complicated interfaces, art, sound design and more
Once you learn the basics of your language and engine, you can make alot of cool things
I cannot emphasize enough how important knowing a good bit of code is for game design, because then you know your limits and you don't have to code all the time as there are so many other things you can work on in a project.
And just have fun, and remember it will be hard but a little preservance goes a long way, it wasn't easy for me, but I absolutely love the talents I have now
Please don't give up :)
@@TheWeen344 tips on how to get to that level? I always find myself lost when it comes to Coding
My first commercial program was a 4 player volleyball game I wrote for a national magazine back in 1981. The magazine would publish games written in Basic for Radio Shack, Apple, and Atari computers. I learned a great deal by studying the listings.
The video was clear and on point.
My take:
The general consensus is Programming/Coding is just knowing and remembering the syntax.
The truth is it also involves own logic, creativity, genuine interest for problem solving and understanding the purpose of coding. It requires thinking about the smallest possible detail and converting it into a code of suitable programming language based on the available hardware and software resources.
Shanmuka Nalli but these are some things that I think the general public will need to have a basic understanding of in the future. At the same level that highschool algebra does not make you a mathematician but does give you pattern recognition skills that are advantageous in day to day activities.
Chigeh I agree with your point.
A general knowledge of programming/code is essential in current times.
My point is: Better awareness and understanding of the job profile of a programmer is required so that the right people take it up as a job.
Coding as a general subject is necessary but coding as a job is a different ball game.
For example:
Mathematics knowledge is essential for everyone but only few should take up Accounting job as it requires genuine interest and specialization.
In short: I meant there is lack of clarity regarding Coding as a essential Subject and specialized Job
Knowing how to code obviously means being able to write a Hello World routine.
Creativity is THE talent of all, making anything, art, music, models or programming, requires creativity.
What you refer to is known more as software engineering.
If you know how to code, you can hack together a program that does what you want, sure. But that sure as heck isn't what all those great technology companies do. What they do isn't coding, it's software engineering at its finest. The actual programming (in the sole activity being writing the code) is maybe like 10% of the work.
Thats why I don't agree when people say children should learn how to code (again, in the sense of hacking together bits of code that do the thing). Rather, they should learn the concepts of tackling a complicated problem, breaking them up in smaller ones and being creative about solving them that really make this job what it is. Because these are universal skills you can apply in much more situations in life rather than knowing how to type up a hello world function.
7:32 The sponsored product transition was really smooth
Yeah, I have actually enjoyed the video up to that point and then audibly i went "oh fuck you". Pulling shit like this completely destroys whatever point you were making.
skillshare is really cool man and he made an ad really well so don't hate on THAT.. and its also topic related
Gábor Balogh Yea, it's kinda shitty. But at least he put it at the end after he finished his main topic of the video. Better than nothing I guess...
but ... He wants to get benefits from this video, he did a lot of hard work for making this video, hours and hours, is it hard for you to see a skippable ad to give him at least the motivation to make more videos like this?
I really don't get why you guys get all salty about this. You see the ad, you stop the video. Is that simple. Is not ethical to ask for good video content while condemning its creator for trying to make a living out of them.
Teachers get selected for love of the job? No. Not really. That's just simply not true.
No, they do not get selected because they love the job, they go into the field of teaching because they love their subject.
@@Actovania holy shit man I just realized that... makes so much sense
Teaching is the refugee of Theatre Arts majors .
@@kris030 That’s why most math teachers are crazy!
Yeah! And it's a respectable occupation and many people worship them.
That sponsor transition was so smooth I slipped on it and fell
Oh my god. I am a CS student and I’ve been thinking about this exact same thing recently. I cannot express how much I agree with you! It bothers me so much when people talk about this without knowing what it’s really like. And let me just point out that if it were that easy then I wouldn’t be going for 4+ years to university to do this. Programming is so much more than knowing how to write code.
Exactly! There is a huge difference between a coder and an actual programmer. I see many CS students in my college are excitedly discussing about AI, neural network, data mining, robotics and all other huge topics in CS field all the times. Yet they can't comprehends well on very essential topics like big O notation, divide-and-conquer algorithms, dynamic programming, BFS, DFS, minimum span tree , searching shortest paths and so on
Ever García Nguyen Nguyen To be honest I disagree entirely with that assertion. Yes, coding is a highly sought after skill currently, but it’s no more special or intricate then nearly any other field of research, it’s current applications mean little about the content of the curriculum. Personally, I think the types of programming you refer to will be streamlined and demand negated as the learning curve declines. The video seems to suggest that as we move forward, coding will become more and more essential, when really it’s just the opposite. And no, programming isn’t so much more about knowing how to write code, programming is ONLY knowing how to write code. Just because a job requires knowledge in other fields doesn’t take away the essential nature of the job itself.
Meh, I went through much of the CS program at my university, it's a huge lie to say you're learning for 4 years, 2 years are spent on completely useless General Education with maybe a single class or two being useful, and don't give that "it makes you well rounded" stuff, it means nothing, no one I've spoken to (and I've complained about this to everyone) has been able to define "well rounded" or defend how GE achieves it. So, that 50% of university time and money wasted. Now, for the actual CS program, at least in the California State University system, half of it is impractical, almost useless. I came to learn software engineering, yet I had to take many math classes that are never utilized in my CS courses, I had to take Computer Architecture and Assembly Language among others which had maybe 2 class days of utility each. The programming courses I took also felt a bit repetitive among each other. The ONLY thing one will learn of value from a 4 year university is 6 months of knowledge and skills and a piece of paper for your resume. I wouldn't recommend getting a CS degree, instead find a good technical school that will teach you practical CS and get certifications, internships, low level jobs, etc. Study on your own as well. A BS in CS is BS. I don't know about MS though, maybe that's better, but I'm done with school.
My thought is that eventually AI will code better, more efficiently, and cheaper that human beings. And many programmers will lose their jobs.
Jose Carlos Moreno A lot of the courses I’ve taken so far (I’m at the end of my 2nd year) haven’t been useless. All math courses, which I loved, such as Calculus, Algebra, Probability/Statistics, have helped me in one way or another to do more at the time of creating software. Knowing Assembly Language (which I do, specifically MIPS), helps you understand at a much deeper level what’s really going on behind the keywords. What I want to emphasize when I say that programming is so much more than coding is that when doing so there are things you’re only aware of once you’ve understood much deeper topics such as low-level programming, algorithm design, etc, skills which rely on other skills such as maths and physics to correctly understand! I cannot believe you just said you don’t recommend people getting a CS degree because of these reasons you mentioned. Oh my god.
As a CS major,,, I honestly wish I watched this video four years ago because I know so many people that needed to see it. This is awesome.
why you say so?
Bago Garde because I know a lot of people in my major that “know how to code” in the sense that they can watch a YT video on classes or functions and know what to type to not produce error but they don’t actually know how to evaluate and think about an advanced coding problem from the ground up and build a system to do it. They struggle with the assignments we are given now that we are juniors/seniors because they require a deeper level of understanding that you can’t just get from looking at YT videos.
MH Charles-Etuk Can you not get them by listening at the lectures and doing what you need to do?
(I have applied for CS so would be nice to know what to expect)
jojomen100 I mean idk how it is at your school but here the teachers don’t exactly spell it out for you. They tell you how to do it but if it doesn’t come naturally to you then it’ll be hard. Especially cause they don’t teach you HOW to do a project before they give it to you
MH Charles-Etuk Yeah but as i see it, it's pretty obligatory to put lots of your own work in it, so no matter if it comes naturally to you or not it's still not unreasonable as long as you put in work.
You've been skillshared!
Keyvan wkwkwk
ADee SHuPA ?
Make that the new rickroll
*G E T S K I L L S H A R E D L O L*
Alex!
So relatable. I even recommend the same 3 subjects for schools. In fact, this was so relatable that I did not even hear anything new. It was just put in a structured and visually pleasing way.
only people who truly want to code should do it, obviously. i thought i would do it in college and quickly realized i don't give a single shit about it
CometCourse So what is your job now?
So what do you do now?
Not everyone should code because...
Who is gonna do the sound,music and graphics?
the AI that they are programming
They're gonna hire somebody with their salary idiot
Verlax you missed the joke
hi bonjru AI has playing music is nothing compared to an actual human. Ik it was a joke but robots can’t compete with humans
Ultimate G. Reatness robots can’t do emotion so their music will never be as good
Thank you for this video, especially for differentiating between CS and Programming. As a CS PhD student and educator, I encounter hundreds of students misled by the "everybody can code" narrative pushed by universities, programs like Hour of Code, and so on. They're not the same thing, great video.
I have to agree, this also goes for every other subject. Governments and other institutions try to force more people into STEM or whatever is popular at the time. They show only the simple and exiting stuff. This mouth-breathing " I fucking love science" culture leads to many starting college but few finishing. I do electrical engineering and after my first semester almost half left or had to repeat courses. I am almost done now and it seems like 30% will finish in the standard time frame.
I self taught myself programming and computer science starting with JavaScript and QBASIC in 2nd grade Summer camp. After the lessons, still during camp, I tried to code more complex programs myself in QBASIC. I then started Visual Basic on my own and taught myself through videos and articles. I actually posted a program up at CodePlex back in the day when I was just 10. I actually programmed for fun. I actually taught myself C++ back then in order to hack COD4. I ended up writing my own hack and using it. I did basic reverse engineering back then (I started learning how to read x86 ASM back then), but mostly took offsets and addresses posted online. In middle school, I taught myself how to write whole programs in x86 using NASM.
When my parents used to send me to those stupid summer camps again, it was so boring because it was those "everyone can code" crap, but it did open my eyes to computer science. It was painful to go there. My parents couldn't understand why I program all the time, but hate these camps.
@The Eclectic Dyslexic Well exactly. Though it is worth noting that CS has a huge identity problem to the wider public, so for people to decide "they are not really suited for computer science" until they have played their chips by spending thousands of dollars usually doesn't go well. I've met numerous students that found "it was not really suited for them", but stay in the program as they've invested too long into it already. This kind of stuff places a strain on departments as for the larger proportion of people not there for CS, it displaces the needs of those genuinely there to learn CS as an academic subject. When there is a strain, it degrades the standards; something I've been observing more by the year. That's one of the oppositions I have with the narrative. Computer Science isn't about computers, it's fundamentally about computation and is a mathematical science. It's usually already too late by high school as many "CS" courses in high school do not refer to themselves as programming courses, just as "CS" courses (despite having next to no CS content in them).
I'm completely for giving people the OPTION to learn how to code in school. However the age and type of programming is something up for debate, as well as it depends on the aptitude of the teachers. Many schools barely can get Maths education right, and this stuff builds on Maths education. Heck if they made it mandatory in high school to have a computer class that mixes typing with some programming, sure, but don't call it CS. A tech literacy class could be helpful if it had these skills. The last thing we need are a bunch of people thinking they understand what they're doing when they're not and flooding employment markets claiming they know CS. CS has been pigeon-holed unfortunately in a lot of universities to be "that place the coders go", when there are equally many great vocational schools/colleges that offer programming lessons. If somebody wants to learn how to program for free (for the purposes you're describing), there are many many options; many great books (this has been the case since the late 90's) and online tutorials.
Sayed Asif Even mechanical engineering will require some coding at some point so doing a bit of coding will help you for sure.
@The Eclectic Dyslexic, what you've described is a similar experience to what I've had both as an instructor and a TA, especially in a growing fashion in the last few years especially. It is both concerning and something that hurts me a bunch as an educator and somebody that wants students to pick at my brain. There is an overall trend with grades over substance (this is generally the case with uni students), that is a part of it but also I have been noticing that the standards have been lowering; mostly due to strain and also to avoid conflict and having to deal with administrators. Many CS departments do not have as much gate-keeping of who passes and who fails as other science/math departments. For example, I was TAing a course for maybe 3-4 years at this point and have watched a course turn into one with full blown closed-book exams to one where they let students have double-sided 8.5x11 inch "cheat sheets" for their "closed-book" exams (these unfortunately are not decisions I'm allowed to make). Meaning they don't need to remember anything if they put all the notes in 8 point font. While I understand the "learning strategy" it really takes away the closed-book nature of these kinds of exams. This is an example among many. Little things like that really concern me as nobody seems to want to hold anybody else accountable and whenever you do, you're the "bad" person. I've been watching the standards of writing, reasoning, and comprehension with students slip worse by the year.
The students that make it worth it are those that ask questions, and obviously are attentive. However, I find the number of those smaller in number; it varies term to term, but I'm not optimistic about the future. I especially say this as a theory guy, the areas that tend to be the worst "victims" in this whole thing as they're both "not sexy" and "unpopular" among many students "that don't want to be there". It gives the departments little incentive to maintain them or even offer some that aren't mandatory (or even cut them or merge them). This should be obviously concerning as theoretical computer science is the foundation and bedrock of the field.
I think most people go into programming thinking it's about learning a programming language. The thing is, the demand is so high that they may learn a language, call themselves a programmer and be successful. This is a problem because it leads to poorly written software and poorly written software has become the norm.
I would argue digital security is a subject everyone should study (somewhat related to programming).
Programmers with high salary are the person who keep learning, has common sense, good logical thinking and creative ppl, in every industry, this kind of ppl are highly paid
People who program:
I am not that good.
Children who do BLOCK CODING:
pROfeSiOnAL
Soo true
Block coding fricked me up 10 to eat old me when I got C++ “This is tooo hard!!!!!”
Especially scratch. You can find good projects that are good but everything is filled with trash platformers for views and likes that you don't even get money for
@@Tuberex I'd say scratch is good for beginners for training their logic
Or the people who use Wix to make their websites instead if HTML
Saw that CGP Grey "Humans need not apply" nod.
Holy shit I couldn't remember where that was from. thanks!
I would be very happy to see more abstract logic based subjects taught at schools in general.
The very basics of programming should be taught to everyone. It could just be (half) a semester: give everyone a IDE and a Python env and let them solve first a few exercises and finally a simple project.
Had this happened to me at school, I would have been hooked much earlier. Give a proto-nerd an IDE and a Python env, and he can directly go on to experiment with web scrawling, machine learning or creating a website. It would lower the barrier of entry drastically.
Great commentary on the link between our education system and the hype of jobs in the job market and each side.
Absolutely amazing video. Being an avid programmer I definitely agree with every point made in this video. In fact, I myself see the push happening nowdays and the rapid promotion of programming, and it simply doesn't make sense cause not only does it make it harder for people actually interested and proficient in comp sci to get a job, but creates a pool of people not interested or proficient and devalues the field
Samvit Agarwal Can I say dot-com crash 3.0? Looks like it's a replay of the late '90s boom and bust.
I believe coding will be divided in two tiers in the future. Visual programming and linear programming. Even today, it's possible for non-techies to do stuff only programmers were able to do. As a basic example, take websites. It takes around 5 months to be proficient with Wordpress and some basic customization, but it takes 3 years of learning how to code to achieve the same result. BUT, as soon as Wordpress break something, you need to call a programmer.
That's how I see the future. I see programs that democratize the creation of content on the web, like wordpress but for everything (bubble.is another example, webflow, appypie, buildbox, gamemaker, ecc). So creating digital content will not be a skill of programmers only. But programmers will be the doctors of the web. So, everyone can do everything, but when something bad happen, you call the doctor. For the internet, you call the programmer.
So, I see a bright future for programmers, since they will be paid a lot more (if my Wordpress site breaks I will pay anything to have it back on track), but I see a lower demand. That's just my two cents.
McCoder - diamonds and rocks aren't interviewed by someone who can't tell the difference. And yes, it is on them. Too often than not, hiring managers don't know how to interview for developers. They will look at a resume with 7 years of experience and drawing a conclusion that experience is equivalent to competence. Your naivety on the subject isn't founded from bad logic, as I thought much like you did before I experienced what it was like to work in the industry. There are "bad" developers everywhere for a multitude of reasons, and it is very hard to tell who is who in a 30 minute interview, but plain as day to see in the first code-review before a code merge.
Well if you're a programmer obviously you're going to agree that less competition is good. You're a biased party. You can't speak for the interests of the dispassionate people who could benefit from learning the skill.
I'd even say there's a layer above that. The layer of a programmer who's technically skilled enough to do all that doctoring if neccesary, but also create and maintain long lasting applications that run for instance on the web, but also run on the navigation computer of a sea ship. That programming skill combined with a business insight for what is actually valueable and what isn't with the capability to communicate it is where there's a real demand I think. Because these people can tell you in a second or two of your idea is feasible with a given amounth of money, discuss and refine your idea and are actually also able to execute it.
Me: ok let's learn Python and R
Also me: why is this recommended to me
so i ain't the only one
lmao
@@depression_isnt_real O.of
@@depression_isnt_real do you not realize the potential programming has? You could so many things , it's just amazing. I don't see why anyone could hate programming.
Don't waste your time with R
The fact that I am recommended this video when I started to think about learning coding is scary.
Nothing is a coincidence
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Error on line 32
108 warning just-
for you.
It’s actually agitating when I can’t fix it 😭😭
Im scared by just reading this
The warnings piss me off so much
and after you checked the lines 4617 times and spent 12 hours searching the error, reading the full code, all the warnings were because of a coma missplaced ...
And then find out you placed a break or return in the wrong line
"Many can afford a big fancy house, or rent a closet in San Francisco"
*B O O M*
Yeah, but think of all those high-paying SF jobs you won't be able to get taxed at 80% for! (Fed+state) Like, seriously, what's the point of living if you can't be a tax slave that lives in a glorified toolshed that has a fuckhuge property tax and is surrounded by places that charge 15 bucks a lb. for basic ass vegetables?
@Rxbyg Dug
I would hope so. I filed a corporation with Nevada for the express purpose of write-offs and other benefits.
But FUCKKKKKK San Francisco. Those houses are glorified cabinets on over-priced landfill with stupidly expensive property tax. I repeat, FUCK San Fran. Okay to visit, NOT okay to live or work in.
Oh yeah and their gun laws are retarded. Another reason Nevada is better. The only places worth buying in California are ones where there aren't any people around for miles-- ones where there is no house on it and you have to build your own. At that point, all their insanely over-reaching shitty laws won't touch you, because you're simply just too far away and they have several dozen million junkie VD carrier libtards to deal with.
manictiger Let's gas SF with Novichok
purpleravenstar Don’t hate lol. I’ve lived in SF till I was 19, best experience of my life. SF is experience as fuck now, but Seattle is just as great and much more affordable so no big deal 👌
@Symon
Seattle literally has the worst property tax rate in the entire U.S.A. I think there's a lot of teens and early 20s that have their parents pay for things and don't notice this kind of stuff, or how these things make everything else more expensive, but once you get older, you'll probably notice. You'll notice how business that have to pay all this shit close more often, charge more, etc. You could call it 'trickle up theory', whereby, all the money goes to the state, Stalin-style. You'll notice how much of your money continually gets THROWN AWAY to a landlord just to keep you from living under a bridge, because life in these Democrat-run shit holes is so expensive that you will die 5 times over before you can afford a house!
If you become a businessman like me, then you'll avoid the traps, but still despise them. The libertarians are right. This government needs a major downsizing. I've been through those pretty little government zones. Bronze and marble statues, wooden art pieces hanging from the ceiling, fountains, expensive ass experimental architecture, buildings made entirely of window panes and high-grade steel alloy, buildings made entirely of reinforced concrete, etc. That's where your money goes. Monuments to government overtaxing and overspending. Meanwhile, so many people can barely even afford the rent on their glorified particle board WALK-IN CLOSETS! Why? Taxes. The expenditures get passed down onto you.
That add transition was smoooth 🔥👌🏼
As a teacher, I feel basic programming and coding skills should be implemented in schools through science or math classes. The issue lies with the importance and stress of standardized exams. Less exams and more necessary courses
What about Not Everyone Should Videoblog?
lol
That should be emblazoned across the top of UA-cam's homepage.
don't ever videoblog
As an electrical engineer the extent of my programming knowledge is knowing universal language and copying and pasting libraries into arduino software lol
Really, that's it? How difficult is the major/job? I'm interested but it seems lucrative
@@DoctorWhoNow01 It really depends on what field you want to focus in. As for general curriculum we never went super in-depth with programming and it's basically just there so we know what we're looking at if we're collabing with a comp sci/computer engineer. As for circuit analysis and design the basic concepts are pretty straightforward but the reality of the situation becomes increasingly more complicated as more variables get added. The difficulty is in having a very strong understanding of your fundamentals so you can adapt to different different problems rather than attempting to memorize one of the billions of different possible configurations a problem might present itself to you.
Namely, the electrical engineering curriculum is very math and physics intensive, and you will be taking many of the the same classes that math and physics undergrads take. In the curriculum having good algebra skills is very important for getting high marks, although the most important thing is knowing the fundamentals like the back of your hand because concepts just keep building off of one another and the material will seem impossible to learn if you aren't solid with the material its building off of.
Lots of people struggle with EE and so is regarded as one of the hardest engineering disciplines along with chemical engineering but I think it's more because it's just different than it is objectively harder than other disciplines. It's more abstract and mathematical because you don't see the moving parts as say a civil engineer would. This also means it can be frustrating to troubleshoot a circuit that doesn't give a desired output becuase of maybe one slight problem or because your transistor you're using is fried. It's a test of organization and patience a lot of the time, IMO.
@@TheArnoldification as someone studying EE I relate to this 100%
Damn, industry really needs more people having this honest conversations. I totally agree with everything you said, specially oversimplification.
The worst thing is telling kids they can program while all they do is snap together a few code blocks
There's an evil company in India just doing that to hundreds of thousands kids, and they ask for ₹70,000 to ₹80,000 (1000 USD)
Teachers are actually underpaid. Don't give that 'Passion' bullshit. Money isn't the driving force behind a job, but the pay has to justify staying there. Most people hear about a Teacher's salary, and walks away. The price of school makes it not worth it. You can have the feeling of being a teacher by getting any other job that can require you train others for. Doesn't have to be students, in which half of them have no interest in paying attention to you.
gredangeo Come to India... Some teachers in Kota (an Indian city) are paid close to $100,000. (p.a.)
Note:- They teach only high school students
Here's the problem, technology provides far more information than teachers do, hence why teachers them self copy and paste from it.
gredangeo Yeah America is fucked. My dad is a maths teacher in high school here in Australia, he earns 90k AUD or 70k USD, which is average for a teacher here.
Not to mention what teachers are paid isn't worth the B.S. you get because a parent doesn't like you failing their kid or calling them out on bullying
Me: Excited about comp sci course this september.
Comments: Valid points about why it might not be a great field.
Me: *Frantic internal screaming*
Mr Folopolopos You should take the course anyway to see what it's like
Ana Scarlet i plan on it. I am genuinely interested in it anyways 😆
If you are really excited to do that, then you would do fine. I’m a software engineer intern, and I found out that software is not really my thing. Im currently getting my BS in Computer Engineering, and I’m actually more interested in the electrical part of CompE, like circuit modeling and other things not really software related.
What's the difference between computer engineering and computer science, I'm starting computer engineering
Well in my college it is different (I think so), I have seen the subjects and there's a lot of math, physics and programming. Also computer architecture, electronic things, algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI).
I'm paid close to 6 figures for my tech job, but programming is a frighteningly small part of my day-to-day workload. Studying CS at university is where I learned to program, but it was the maths and problem solving skills that made me so valuable.
Randall Stephens no. I'm pretty sure it's programming since technology uses programming to operate and that programming requires and teaches the act of logical thinking. I mean, why don't maths teachers be paid the same as you?
Because teachers are not IT industry specific.
Segun you are confusing Mathematicians with Math teachers. Mathematicians earn a ton of money in the industry. Real mathematicians are highly sought after. A math teacher doesn't study the level of mathematics a mathematician does.
Segun Oriola math is extremely complex and math teachers know very little about it just like any layman
The collective knowledge of coding is important though. More programmers might results in a wider pool of knowledge. I saw a comment about Stackoverflow and how integral it has become and I couldn't agree more. I think everyone should learn the basics but not everyone should pursue it as a career.
It's a bit like learning to draw or playing an instrument.
Almost everyone can try it, some people who never would've expected it might bring some incredible works into this world, but in the end if you're not passionate about it and not willing to suffer because of it you probably shouldn't try to make it your profession.
As a programmer myself, I definitely agree. It's not for everyone. Great points!
Indeed. I find the main value teaching programming offers to people who won't use programming in the future is the logical thinking. If schools focus on teaching logical thinking throughout various classes you'll get more bang for your buck.
06kellyjac so then, let's get rid of maths and teach logical teaching. I don't understand what your saying.
Segun Oriola I do get what you mean but for people like my sister they don't connect the dots and notice the patterns and logic in maths.
Plenty of people develop logical thinking from getting competent at maths etc. (or just think that way to start with) but some who struggle with maths don't develop it which further impacts their ability to grasp maths etc.
I just think there can be a bit more of a push directly for logical thinking and that it will augment other learning.
06kellyjac but the taught in logical thinking is received through learning maths and computer science. It allows you to build the mind set of creating solutions in the most efficient way possible.
You can't teach writing without a pen. So you can't teach logical thinking without maths and computer science.
Here's an example, if I saw a toy in my path, the logical thing to do is simply pick it up and put it away from my path. But for me to do that, I need to know the concept of what the possibilities are.
So like this,
If (toy is in path):
Then move away
Else stand where you are.
So as I said, it is inherent in those subjects.
It is not for everyone, but neither is writing a novel or being a scientist or crunching numbers. Nonetheless we all have to learn the basics of this in school. Do we need to learn how to be software engineers? No, but we should be teaching the language and basic logical systems. That is useful to EVERYONE.
CS has the highest drop out rate of any course in Ireland I believe.
Why is that?
@@ryanc2115 lmao did you watch the video
not just Ireland, us as well... unfortunately I'm in a way that instead of completely dropping out though I pivoted too M.I.S, though I'm teaching myself python through the help of UA-cam. etc I will be covering sql in the degree with those and some accounting I'll more than likely be fine.
@@ryanc2115 Calculus, Physics, Discret Mathematics, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, Statistics, Algorithms, Compilers and Formal Languages, and so on... the CS is really tough.
Because it’s boooorinng. Just kidding but it’s difficult and for many other reasons
This is the best 8 minute long skillshare add i've ever seen
6:08 - that is the same thing that happened in india . The supply rise & the sallary fall. Now in every family there is at least 1 programmer. And the sallary is less than govt. Jobs
Wow that was one long commercial
Look at the descrption.
@@AcceleratorUlz I did not say it wasn`t click bait, I was just saying that the whole video was not an advertisement. If you actually had a brain and looked into the description, you would see that the advertisement at the end did not have any connection whatsoever to the video. Also, from my understanding , it was not click bait. On the title he clearly put "Not everyone should code", which he explained in more detail in his video.
AcceleratorUlz It's not a commercial. This was his sponsor for this video. He gets paid for this. He only puts it in the end. What's the problem?
@@AcceleratorUlz Woah there bud, calm down. An advertisement is a public announcement that promotes a product, service, or event. Specifically, trying to explain why someone shouldn't code isn't promotion, so that throws YOUR argument out the window. There was only a snippet of advertisements completely irrelevant to the argument he was trying to make by Google, and the sponsor at the end. Just because it was in the description, that doesn't justify it's non importance as it's something the creator wanted you to know, and clearly not put half assed arguments talking about I watch "Fortnite" videos. In conclusion, what it really comes down to is YOUR stupidity, and can you accept that what you said, is in fact, false?
@@infinitekaister I actually read this, did not expect to see the word "Fortnite", but rather 'Civilization V'. To me THAT did look in fact like promotion, or was it just me?
Sooo, this 8 minutes and 46 seconds video is just an advertisement for Skillshare?
ok I guess..
Extremely high quality video! I am a developer myself and I gotta say most people won't be able to deal with everything that comes with programming. Learning to code in 14 weeks yeah right. You sure can learn a programming language but being able to solve a problem completely on your own might take years of experience. There are million things you should learn just so you are able to brainstorm ideas about possible solutions...
As a batch coder, I've already had a taste of that.
But I'd imagine it's leagues harder than using a simple notepad and thinking up a creative way to get numbers and letters to display in a window based on the contents of a file/folder.
Black Screen Education for some reason my college thinks 14 weeks is enough 🤔🤔🤔
D Mack I don't know what batch coders do but there are many programming languages and some are harder than others. Anyway the hardest part is to teach a machine to do what you want it to do.
QueenThoria you can learn a programming language in that time but being able to code is much more than that. Colleges teach us very little of what we'll actually need when we start working.
I am IT teacher myself and we spend almost a year to make regular people to understand the full basics of being a programmer
Many think: Computers are very important and a great tool; so everyone (or at least as many people as possible) should learn to use them properly. This is something I totally agree with. But then they think: well, the best way to achieve this is to teach everyone how to code. That's not only total overkill but also potentially discouraging for people that could benefit from computer skills but are scared by the math...
also it's completely ignoring different aspects of C.S like database and Sql, my mind is that of lists ever since I was a kid, the first time I touch excel it was like magickly easy for me too pick up, then counting things and thinking of running money was my second passion, well needles too say I'm going for a accounting m.is degree which is accounting with sql, and a little of coding( though I'm not a big fan of coding.)
Not everyone should be making UA-cam videos.
But he definitely should. We need more people with content this high-quality and with arguments this well thought-out. (I might not have agreed with the arguments, but his other videos especially are REALLY good.)
@@tokqgfx3360 Yeah, we really need more people trying to masquerade ads as genuine discussions. How can you not notice that?
@@tokqgfx3360 More like sleazy ads for shitty services...
@@wm1069 he said he's among the ones who get 6 figures salary.
@@wm1069 lol he knows it's a trap but still he delivers the advertisement like he is suggesting you
Programming is like advanced math, most people could learn to do it with enough training, but most won't actually enjoy it or be good at it.
theacp127 yah except programming is fun and creative, and advanced math is boring by itself.
Most programming is actually more like basic math. Most people just suck at math, period. I’m reminded of a saying: “There are only three really hard things in programming: naming things and off by one errors”
I was going to try and defend advanced math, but then realized I've spent the last 3 hours on UA-cam instead of doing my statistics homework. Hmm.
Katar Advance math is by far more creative than plain boring coding... It's like a Symphony of beautiful abstract structures and amazing ideas. The best part of programming is the algorithmic content, which has a mathematical nature. Learn more...
manictiger I've done that for you ;) guess I have to get back to work on My thesis too
I’m from a third world country. A friend of mine went to the US to study computer science he graduated and is now a writer 😄. He said he doesn’t care about computers and just did it because that’s what his dad wanted. Imagine spending all that money ,as an international student for that matter, and nothing comes of it?
That's probably the worst outcome of all haha, does his dad know that he became a writer?
Tsiobieman I’ll think so. He lives with his parents 😄
@@MrStylesp9 That dude.. Damn... But actually.. Everyone is locked in that kind of concept. If your parents dont force you to learn uninteresting stuff, the school will do it surely ;)
I mean.... Who is using math in life other than calculating the fucking price of the choclate bar you want?
Are you ashamed of telling our country name pal?
Sarthak Sharma why would you think I’m Indian? Lmao
1. Specialization is important
2. Learning to program does not guarantee a 6-figure job because it’s not everyone’s cup of tea
3. Not every important subject should be taught in school (?)
So I am in my bachelor (Netherlands) for computer science. And I agree with the programming part but I disagree about the way of thinking. Ever since I started with programming my look on the world changed. Why? Not the programming itself but it is the way of dealing with a problem. I think the problem solving part should be a required class and not for programming but for average stuff. After some time you can see things more critically and start solving problems for more directions and not just your personal need.
I've watched many videos on yt that said you can learn coding and get a job without a degree, is that right though?
And referring to the video and the comments i see that basically the coding part is the tool easy to learn and the programming part is the actual job which is learned by experience? Like it's problem solving referred to the client's needs?
I'm soon gonna start college and these videos about self teaching coding and actually getting a job made me feel like paying college and learning computer science there isn't worth it and that i have to change my major and I'm kinda stuck here though i love topics about coding and programing , can you tell me anything since you probably finished college? Is it worth it or not? Do you think you're able to learn what you took in college alone?
Problem decomposition and basic logic are great skills for just about any trade. I went into software development from a corporate finance background and just that skillset alone really made the transition easier. But yeah, its not for everyone.
@@nightfury8848 depends, can you learn coding, design webpages and stuff? Absolutely. But comp sci is more than that, you learn a lot of discrete math, computational and automata theories which are applied to more complex fields like Artificial intelligence, machine learning and so on. Think of programming like applied mathematics, anyone can do math but the field is so much more than what you see at surface level.
@@kindredspirit9544 actually a couple of days ago i watched videos on the math you take in computer science and yes it is not that math you take in school, i saw somethings like the graph theory and other thing that are actually very complex but very satisfying and now i see computer science like more of a way to discover the key to simplify stuff by making a general equation to it, there might be more into it obviously judging by how little I've watched about that topic and it's actually so satisfying and so fulfilling yet so complex for a beginner like me
@@kindredspirit9544 it was really fascinating when i firsted watched it and tried to actually understand it , it's like a way to crack a code of something and it's so satisfying to actually get actually good and true results
Before I started using all my extra time to work on UA-cam videos, I was trying to learn to code. I heard a lot of people talking about how coding will be the future's "blue collar" job. If that is true, then as you said, the salaries will inevitably drop. I still think it is a valuable skill to learn, and one I hope I will have time for again in the future, but certainly not essential.
FutureNow Which language did you try? I fiddled around Java for a few months when I worked in IT recruitment and wanted to stop feeling inferior to all those guys my age I talked to on a daily basis. I've forgotten most of the basics by now but I'm pretty sure I could relearn them easily if I wanted to. I think I gave up somewhere past the loops, I just couldn't get them to work if they got any more complicated.
FutureNow problem with self teaching is that no matter how good you become, no company is going to hire you as a programmer if you just walk in without a degree. Its only good if your learning to code as a means yo some end like making an app, game etc. I could be wrong about this tho I doubt it
yarpen26 if you were still just learning about loops then you were still just learning the very basics... Anyways when I thought myself to program, Java was the first language I learnt. It's not the easiest to start with but it's not the hardest either...
natty_the_great Thats just wrong. Go to Quora or the programming subreddits on Reddit, there are plenty of people who have developer jobs who don't have a degree or a computer science degree. The demand is so high for *good* software developers that companies will take you if you can show them you have skill, regardless of whether or not you have a degree. Besides, if the degree is so important, all those coding bootcamps wouldn't be so popular since you don't graduate with a degree anyways.
natty_the_great
Regardless of how much you know, you probably can’t enter a company in a field like this without them training you as a new employee and “catching you up to speed” on the more obscure parts of the language that they use. Programming languages are often so vast with so much documentation for a person to be familiar with all of the less common, more obscure applications.
Showing that you have learned programming, at least on a base level, might indicate that you are responsive to training.
I don't want a career in programming, but I'm glad I spent a good portion of my younger years learning how to code. I love problem solving and programming was a great way to develop that skill. That's why I really loved doing it. It started with Scratch and soon developed into Java, Python, Basic, etc. In each stage there were points when I was frustrated because I couldn't solve a bug/error, but the satisfaction of fixing it was worth banging my head against the wall for a couple of hours.
So, while it's not the only avenue, coding can be a great way to develop problem solving skills and critical thinking. It's also just fun to create things. And I think something that's unique to my experience was that I was able to find a community through it.
Great video, dude!
*Matheuzoid Gameplays* While I don't know what his answer would be, I hear that after enough time being in the field, it is that very feeling of solving problems that starts to become cumbersome. You no longer want to sit and bang your head angst the wall each and every single day. You no longer want to think to that same capacity. Eventually, you want something that's a bit more relaxed and repetitive, and CS can't give you that in the ling run. This is just what I've heard, though, not my own experience.
There's a lot of truth to that. A lot of jobs are the same day in, and day out. You know what to expect every day. With programming, I have a general sense of what I'll be working on next week. But a month or two from now? No idea. And every day brings a new set of challenges, so there's a lot of uncertainty. That can cause some anxiety over time.
Very true the satisfaction from figuring out a problem that was causing you so much trouble really feels like the best thing in the world
Akram, not true. After programming for at least 6 months you should be able to solve mostly everything and probably after around a year wouldn't even be making mistakes.
Promxy Mc yea sure mr genius