John Cleese's Psychic Experience with dead friends

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 бер 2024
  • Watch the Full Podcast Here: • John Cleese | Club Ran...
    Subscribe to the Channel for more Podcasts like this!
    Listen to the Show on all Podcast Apps "Club Random with Bill Maher" podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    John Cleese and Bill Maher on Monty Python’s best work, Bill’s new book “What This Comedian Said Will Shock You,” meditation, how to slow down time, whether British people or the Irish drink more, the American propensity to worship weakness, the three phases of relationships, how many soulmates you can have in life, the source of creativity, how stress affects our lifespan, how Trump attacked Bill, John's psychic experience, Bill's friends who've seen ghosts, and much, much more!
    All Social here
    www.clubrandom.com
    / club-random-1017764891...
    / clubrandom_
    / clubrandompodcast
    / clubrandompodcast
    www.billmaher.com
    / billmaher
    / billmaher
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 121

  • @jimmipadge
    @jimmipadge 2 місяці тому +34

    “Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out”

  • @jtee5957
    @jtee5957 2 місяці тому +10

    I love John Cleese, but even I knew most of those details about Graham Chapman just from watching docs of Monty Python over the decades.

  • @erniehudson1
    @erniehudson1 2 місяці тому +5

    The image of John Cleese sitting absolutely gullible opposite of a charlatan who just googled him to talk about more obscure parts of his career is heartbreaking...

  • @willisouthside
    @willisouthside 2 місяці тому +8

    Always found it interesting how so many people say they believe in the Holy Spirit, angels and the Devil but don't believe in the existence of ghostly spirits.

  • @longlakeshore
    @longlakeshore 2 місяці тому +16

    The Flying Circus is on Netflix. Has been for years. She could easily see the rolled up trouser leg in the Freemason sketch and that Graham smoked a pipe in sketches. I've watched the series every year. Bill is right: I want that psychic's job. Too easy.

  • @Sidewinder426-dk9lw
    @Sidewinder426-dk9lw 2 місяці тому +3

    Sadly, it appears he John has no grasp of the information available at everyone's fingertips via google or UA-cam. But hey... he's 84. Not to mention the priceless amount of comedic genius he's provided us over the years. One of the greats !!!

  • @tygerstripes3752
    @tygerstripes3752 2 місяці тому +5

    Oh John, I do dote on you, but *anyone* could say Graham was waving around a parrot. And I just did a shallow search and my first hit was "Surprising things you didn't know about John Cleese" and #1 was the lemur. So this psychic could easily have prepared herself with these images. Please, John, *please*.

  • @chadd1428
    @chadd1428 2 місяці тому +21

    The psychic just googled john cleese and played him like a fiddle

  • @MaxHarden
    @MaxHarden 2 місяці тому +25

    The scientific explanation is termed: "conned"

  • @lesfaby8997
    @lesfaby8997 2 місяці тому +11

    Wikipedia has his namesake lemur. Probably she read his wiki page before the interview. No psychic power needed.

    • @carrieohio
      @carrieohio 2 місяці тому +1

      The second time he was waving a lemur? Why couldn't he just hold it? It's the waving part that's weird.

  • @tom-ss2mn
    @tom-ss2mn 2 місяці тому +8

    I like that when a spirit of a dead relative finally gets to talk to you thru a psychic, they talk about nonsense. Only subjects to "verify" that theyre real lol

  • @hughmann1908
    @hughmann1908 2 місяці тому +4

    I’m adopted, no psychic has ever been able to tell me this, so I haven’t found a “real one” yet 😊

  • @T_from_U
    @T_from_U 2 місяці тому +5

    Oh John...

  • @ayoole
    @ayoole 2 місяці тому +2

    "There's no way she could have known that.' err .... Wikipedia.

  • @erniehudson1
    @erniehudson1 2 місяці тому +2

    John Cleese has to google how cold reading works. The psychics just throw out bits and pieces of little information and then the guest provides them with the rest. I once seen John Edward live because a girl took me along and he is supposed to be one of the biggest, even South Park dedicated an entire episode to him, and to me it was SOO obvious that he was doing cold reading. "Ahh.. hmm... I am getting a signal.. of a name with G.... is it Gary? Does anyone know a Gary?... ham... I think I see a George... does any one know a George?" Person in audience stands up and yells "My uncle was called George!" "Oh, George tells you that he loves you. He is concerned about a valuable painting you have." "I don't have a painting, but my aunt" "Yes, and he is concerned about your aunt's painting." And everybody claps.

  • @HiMotionAndDesign
    @HiMotionAndDesign 2 місяці тому +2

    John Cleese is a wise man

  • @artgreig7069
    @artgreig7069 2 місяці тому +2

    How much did she charge?

  • @rmkep
    @rmkep 2 місяці тому

    Some of the "evidence" is extraordinary ... perfect description e.g. well outside of ordinary. 🤨

  • @hannoverfist5628
    @hannoverfist5628 2 місяці тому +4

    Hoisted on his own humility………. John ol boy……if you think the medium didn’t know you were coming and studied you at great length……you are kidding yourself

  • @bigmonmagoomba9634
    @bigmonmagoomba9634 2 місяці тому +3

    PT Barnum was right.

  • @frankjamesbonarrigo7162
    @frankjamesbonarrigo7162 2 місяці тому +2

    I had an experience, that’s all I’ll say. Don’t worry, we’ll all find out

  • @barryrivadue9228
    @barryrivadue9228 8 днів тому

    I'd rather take his word for it.

  • @barbaramcspadden8655
    @barbaramcspadden8655 2 місяці тому +1

    I don't know. I don't know. Perfectly acceptable. Try it.
    Ever think, I'm not seeing everything. Here and now? Woah, I' m standing at a street corner in W. Philly and it's 3 am. You think why am I stopped? Next minute a car is flying through the crosswalk running a red light where you would have been walking? 😌

  • @collinsmcrae
    @collinsmcrae 2 місяці тому +10

    He basically just described how he got duped by cold reading. "She said something like.." "and I said...". Yeah, you grafted something real onto her clever gibberish.

  • @InjuredRobot.
    @InjuredRobot. 2 місяці тому +4

    It's Cleese as in cheese, not Cleese as in geese. Although either pronunciation is equally gullible.

    • @jonathansteadman7935
      @jonathansteadman7935 2 місяці тому

      Because his name IS Cheese, but he changed it to Cleese.

    • @InjuredRobot.
      @InjuredRobot. 2 місяці тому

      No he didn't. His father did before going into the military during WWI. Did you come in here for an argument?

  • @atomicoranges8462
    @atomicoranges8462 22 дні тому

    Very suprised at Cleese's gullibility.

  • @savage1469
    @savage1469 2 місяці тому +1

    Psychic experience 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @frankjamesbonarrigo7162
    @frankjamesbonarrigo7162 2 місяці тому +1

    East to debunk stuff like this with a famous guy

  • @Malouco
    @Malouco 2 місяці тому

    I believe we go into a dream state or a slumber at death. This is biblically backed. I believe that without the body our dream state or slumber will be a reality as much as the limits our bodys experience feels.
    I believe this slumber or dreamstate is not a purgatory but a place where we will be faced with our decisions on earth. Some of us will be tormented by the truths we denied and the lies we spread.
    I also believe we can be awoken from this slumber. Our energy can be summoned. Its not typical but possible. Solomon summoned old wisemen from their rest
    Jesus summoned Elijah and Moses (WITHOUT ANY RITUAL NEEDED)!
    I dont believe anyone can do this and dabbling in this u can conjure a deceptive spirit.
    I have seen summoning with my own eyes and u can't get me to lie and say it didnt happen!

    • @brando7266
      @brando7266 2 місяці тому

      U should go on 60 minutes, to prove it,

  • @kene6954
    @kene6954 2 місяці тому

    There's alot of fool's gold being hocked out there, which I think Cleese is going way too easy on here. But just because fool's gold exists doesn't mean real gold doesn't exist. And I understand Dawkin's refusal to read. I've read up on certain issues enough that it becomes a certain amount unlikely I will find something new by further reading. At that point, YOU have to do the work to show me where there is something new TO ME in what you are presenting on such an issue in order for me to read it. You have to know where I'm at, and know you've got something which I will find new to me.

  • @ivanconnolly7332
    @ivanconnolly7332 2 місяці тому

    Did the "dead parrot"get in touch.

  • @woodyforrest313
    @woodyforrest313 2 місяці тому

    I don't want to know what John's shoes smell like.

  • @richos5535
    @richos5535 12 днів тому

    Gullible

  • @davidsanders5652
    @davidsanders5652 2 місяці тому

    Sheldrake is a known conman.

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 місяці тому

      How so?

    • @davidsanders5652
      @davidsanders5652 2 місяці тому

      @@Mr.Goodkat As I lifelong popular science reader I bought A new science of life back in the late 1980s (still have it) and it was clearly nonsense. Even to a layman. And I knew, then and there, we had a new von Daniken on our hands. His work was never peer reviewed, his claims impossible to prove and his interpretation of fact as fanciful as von D's claim that pyramids were built by aliens. Frankly I am disappointed with Cleese and can only ascribe his turning to the fairies as a regrettable demonstration that no mind is immune to the ravages of time.

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 місяці тому

      @@davidsanders5652 How is he a conman though? who did he con and how?

    • @davidsanders5652
      @davidsanders5652 2 місяці тому

      @@Mr.Goodkat Now you have shown your true colours. Anyone who buys his books which he flogs as science...including Cleese.

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 місяці тому

      @@davidsanders5652 How is he a coman?

  • @JessicasMagicalTreasures
    @JessicasMagicalTreasures 2 місяці тому +3

    I have so much to share about my experiences, I could write a book! I have proof that the afterlife exists. I personally, believe in God, or a Divine Force. I would never drill or force my beliefs on anyone because people have tried to do that to me. My brother was an Atheist for years- he turned into a Christian- and I have psychic sources that confirm he is in ‘Heaven’ with my grandmother and a few others who are deceased.

    • @stefanross8129
      @stefanross8129 2 місяці тому +1

      😅..... Hahahaha!!!! Hilarious!

  • @alisonfaulkner47
    @alisonfaulkner47 2 місяці тому +4

    Who knew he was so gullible? Never mind that he fed her answers let alone all was public knowledge.

  • @MajorClownShoe
    @MajorClownShoe 2 місяці тому +1

    Wishful thinking is one of the cogs for all superstitions.
    It’s all rubbish.

  • @tomz5704
    @tomz5704 24 дні тому

    Satanic black magic!! Paulie

  • @SuperBagshot
    @SuperBagshot 2 місяці тому +1

    This is embarrassing, it makes everything the pythons done meaningless

  • @MantisEnergy
    @MantisEnergy 2 місяці тому +2

    I think it's John's modesty that allows him to believe his association with Graham (and his pipe) isn't common knowledge 😁

  • @Bootrosgali
    @Bootrosgali 2 місяці тому

    Yeah but Cleese is taking the piss too possibly hmmm?

  • @Azhalan
    @Azhalan 2 місяці тому +17

    Sad to say that I lost a bit of my high esteem for John Cleese after hearing this. The sentence 'Science cannot explain this!' usually just shows that people don't understand what science is. Just because science couldn't explain what an earthquake was a few hundred years ago didn't mean it was supernatural in origin. Science means looking for explanations using scientific methods. Not that something scientists can't explain must be supernatural. Or real.

    • @stefanross8129
      @stefanross8129 2 місяці тому +6

      Correct!!

    • @user-dy7gv1yj5o
      @user-dy7gv1yj5o 2 місяці тому +4

      I'm so glad that he speaks out about this stuff in spite of the nay-sayers. He knows that people are going to say he's nuts - he doesn't give a f.
      Well done old bean!

    • @JP-mp5st
      @JP-mp5st 2 місяці тому +9

      You’re negating your own argument. Science can’t pass judgement on things it can’t yet explain. As Cleese said, the only answer is I don’t know. Think about how many scientific theories in your own lifetime that have been accepted as fact only to be later adjusted or disproven. The “supernatural” becomes the natural once it’s explainable. Every thing is ultimately natural.

    • @XanderMac1023
      @XanderMac1023 2 місяці тому +3

      Then why are there so many things that science HAS NEVER, and WILL NEVER, be able to fully explain?

    • @Azhalan
      @Azhalan 2 місяці тому +3

      @@JP-mp5st That was basically my argument. It is absolutely impossible to say something doesn't exist on a universal scale. But using the argument that something can't be explained scientifically at the moment doesn't mean it's real. Nothing attracts con artists more than people who have lost someone. Apart maybe from crypto currency.

  • @Word77787
    @Word77787 2 місяці тому +1

    Many things happen to me that are unexplainable, there is a spirit realm and God is very real, you have to experience a paranormal event yourself to understand

  • @outdoorboss3061
    @outdoorboss3061 2 місяці тому +1

    What a tool.

  • @jimmipadge
    @jimmipadge 2 місяці тому +8

    The real problem stems from people _wanting_ it to be true. Nobody has communed with the dead. Nobody. *_PERIOD_*

    • @gregh7400
      @gregh7400 2 місяці тому +5

      Great. Where's your evidence?

    • @clarareitz1974
      @clarareitz1974 2 місяці тому +2

      Perhaps the real problem is not having an open mind.

    • @jimmipadge
      @jimmipadge 2 місяці тому +4

      @@gregh7400 where is *_My_* evidence that something _NEVER_ happened? Lmao, that’s not how it works… There is however loads of evidence of how cold reading and other tricks work.

    • @jimmipadge
      @jimmipadge 2 місяці тому +3

      @@clarareitz1974 ….but not so open that your brain falls out…

    • @MantisEnergy
      @MantisEnergy 2 місяці тому +2

      @@gregh7400 Logically the burden of proof doesn't lie with the person denying the claim.

  • @ilovepdub
    @ilovepdub 11 днів тому

    he os sooo wrong about scientists running from the convo. Scientists is what debunked bs he believes in.

  • @georgesotiriou7051
    @georgesotiriou7051 2 місяці тому +6

    You reach this age even an intelligent man like Cleese will start believing nonsense

    • @laurame4301
      @laurame4301 2 місяці тому +4

      Nope, he's been interested in parapsychology for years.
      He's worked with the University of Virginia's Division of Perceptual Studies.
      How do you know it's nonsense?
      You don't.

    • @laurame4301
      @laurame4301 2 місяці тому +1

      Sting has seen a ghost.
      ua-cam.com/video/xkjWnKfpZ1I/v-deo.html
      Dan Akroyd's grandfather was a dentist and psychic researcher. His dad and uncles were spiritualists.
      "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

    • @gregh7400
      @gregh7400 2 місяці тому +2

      @laurame4301 Exactly. It's easy and lazy to simply say it's nonsense and stating your opinions as fact. The University of Virginia School of Medicine has been studying these things since the 1960's. Perhaps deniers should look at their research before pretending they know what they are talking about.

    • @jtee5957
      @jtee5957 2 місяці тому +1

      @@gregh7400 Not saying some of this stuff doesn't exist. It might. Just saying that what Cleese described was available online to anyone with researching skills.

  • @Candide1776
    @Candide1776 2 місяці тому +2

    Such a brilliant comedian to fall for the grifters is a bit disheartening.

  • @jonathansteadman7935
    @jonathansteadman7935 2 місяці тому

    If Richard Dawkins was deaf he'd say sound doesn't exist.Why do people always say was he drunk or on drugs, I've never seen anything while drunk or on drugs, only when sober.

  • @JB.zero.zero.1
    @JB.zero.zero.1 22 дні тому

    Come on John - this is embarrassing.

  • @danamariehouse8360
    @danamariehouse8360 2 місяці тому

    I would hate the idea of living in a world where things like this were not a possibility. Having had an experience like this that literally saved my life...Keep an open mind

    • @collinsmcrae
      @collinsmcrae 2 місяці тому +2

      Things like this aren't possible and you do, unfortunately, live in such a world.

    • @erniehudson1
      @erniehudson1 2 місяці тому

      only because it felt good to you it doesn't make it more true. The likelihood that we are talking about wishful-thinking is actually increased.

  • @andydufresne8034
    @andydufresne8034 2 місяці тому

    He's just wrong. Scientists are not afraid to admit they don't know. Science is fundamentally rooted in admitting that we don't know. Dawkins is always wrongly accused of being elitist when he isn't. The elitists are the ones who accuse him, projecting their own elitism onto him where it doesn't exist. He is a perfectly humble scientist who simply stands up to all the false accusations constantly lobbed at him. When you stand up to bullies, they accuse you of bullying them because in a mind of a bully, refusing to let them bully you is interpreted as a personal attack. The modern atheist movement is the essence of humility and we simply stand up to the arrogant religious people constantly attacking us and tell them we aren't lettting you dominate any longer. And in response, they project their bullying onto us, like looking in a mirror, and accuse us of doing to them what they actually do to us. It is clinical insanity, and it has ruled the world for ages and they can't get it through their heads that their ancient reign of terror is coming to an end.

  • @jonerlandson1956
    @jonerlandson1956 2 місяці тому +1

    holy shit... harry potter was a premonition...