India’s possible name change to Bharat. Why now? What does it mean?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2023
- A controversy is making the rounds ahead of the upcoming G20 summit over the name of host country India. The debate centres on a possible shift from "India" to “Bharat”, a word dating back to ancient Hindu scriptures. Questions have arisen over the timing and manner of referencing President Droupadi Murmu as the “President of Bharat” in the G20 dinner invitation. What message is the Bharatiya Janata Party government trying to send the international community? If India goes through with the name change, what will it mean for locals? Brown University’s Mahatma Gandhi Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies Prerna Singh helps to make sense of the controversy on CNA’s Asia First. Read more: cna.asia/3PulXY8
Subscribe to our channel here: cna.asia/youtubesub
Subscribe to our news service for must-read stories:
Telegram - cna.asia/telegram
WhatsApp - cna.asia/whatsapp
Follow us:
CNA: cna.asia
CNA Lifestyle: www.cnalifestyle.com
Facebook: / channelnewsasia
Instagram: / channelnewsasia
Twitter: / channelnewsasia
TikTok: / channelnewsasia
![ЛЕБЕДЕВ у ДУДЯ: муху не обманешь 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E74h5fvVrqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Let be clear "Bharat" is also the official name of India in the constitution, so its not an extinct name & govt is trying to revive,it always there,& every Indian refer India as Bharat on daily basis in their own language.
Relax ,govt is not doing anything like that, India & Bharat both will coexist.
It seems they're trying to make a big fuss out of this for some reason. I don't understand why.
govt did this to rattle the opposition they wanted to show people, how the opp is fighting insignificant and truly a daily soap opera. They will not change the name as Bharat and India are the same as per constitution. they wanna use bharat a bit more than it was used to. i see no problem. @@wastelandnerd
Bharat is original name. India is given by British
not true. Bharat is what we call ourself from as long as history goes. India is also old but not as old as Bharat but was given by greeks. @@priyamkashyap885
@@wastelandnerdthere are general elections coming in 2024, this is one of those popcorn events for us Indians to enjoy the drama the politicians are going to do
Barath is not a controversial name but the original name
There is nothing controversial. The left wing is unnecessarily dragging a false narrative to make it controversial. Government has made it clear that there is no name change. India n Bharat names shall be used! Yet the left wing media goes on n on. Why are international media simply amplifying this without doing a basic research n confirmation from the government? 😅
@@8spores Are you referring to pre British period. Because you have never read Indian history it seems for would have read about Maurya Emperors
@@8spores And don't worry about Bharat's original territory grabbed by terror nations around
@@8sporesyou should search about Indosphere
@@8sporesyou go back to original territory of just england..there is no concept of united kingdom..free scotland, free northern ireland
CNA didn’t disappoint. They found the most biased one.
Correct😂
India sound good, get used to it.
It depends on the government
Interview a Bhartiya about Bharat matters than an Indian sold to West.
Bharat resonates with 10 thousand years of history of Bharat.
Congress which rules Bharat for 70 years from Independence was hand and gloves with Britisher and worked against interest of majority Hindu.
It's gaining back the lost pride for Hindus and their land Bharat.
'India, that is Bharat'
Is a first line of our constitution
Bharat sounds much much better to the ears.
Really.😊
Reminds me of Borat
@@bobafett5757 can you tell me your original name?
@@AbhinavMishraqi Bobo ChaCha 😁
Yeah BHARAT OCEAN 😂
In indonesian, its mean "THE WEST"
And india is in west side of Indonesia.
It has something to do with the Sundaland theory
India will change its name suddenly.......We have to respect it .........
Who knows new govt will change again to another name? If they found an Indian ancient book that says another name.....
So， I suggest India changes its name to " Keep Changing Name "
Indonesia itself means Indian Islands in Dutch!
Professor calls demonitisation as scandal! It was a govt policy which was aimed to attack black money ! Wondering if the professor is speaking for black money supporters. CNA should check the quality of scholarship before giving their platform to ignorant people !
If this speaker is an expert then I don't know who they call a noob. She is still living in 90's and is very biased towards India.
*India🇮🇳 have border disputes with China, Pakistan, Nepal.*
make border agreement & Keep peace!
Who cares for neighbours who can't respect history... India's original name is Bharath... It's the absolute truth.
India and Bharat both are the official names of Republic of India. So goverment can use both the names. And everywhere you see Goverment of India you will also find Bharat sarkar.
1. Reserve bank of india -> Bharatiya reserve bank.
2. Indian institute of management -> Bhartiya prabandhan sanstha.
Its just opposition parties who created this drama.
According to the scripture Vishnu Purana 400bce
उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।
(Uttaraṃ yatsamudrasya himādreścaiva dakṣiṇam
varṣaṃ tadbhārataṃ nāma bhāratī yatra santatiḥ)
This shloka means: “The country (Varsam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bharatam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata.
Under the Yajurveda 3000bce scripture:
Na Tase Pratima Asti- God has no image statue or idol..Idol worship is wrong, India needs to reform their faith salvation theology first before wasting time about renaming streets avenues and geographical location
Meaning of pratima is replica or image. That means there is no one equal to God. There is no second person that is replica to God.
God is present everywhere. So he is being worshipped in idol also. So worshipping God in idol is 100% correct.
@@fidelcatsro6948 lol you are mixing Abrahamic concept of God with Indian concept. Indian concept of God is everything and nothing at the same time. Read vedas again carefully. Even in soil and every part of creation there is God, even in yourself. God involves everything that we see and experience also which we don't understand and experience. Time to brush up your little knowledge and stop non idol worshippers from kissing black cube in Meçca.
@@0arjun077 lol Bagvad Gita says only the Unintelligent worship created and natural things.. looks like you need to go study more on your scriptures
@@charantamarapu God is not present everywhere...He knows what happens everywhere...If you say he is present everywhere it means it can be the toilet too, We say God is on his Throne in the heavens but he sees and knows everything, this is the correct way to describe his majesty
Try to get used to it. Bharat is here to stay, it's not a name change, "India that is bharat" is written in our constitution .
but Indian ocean and Indian subcontinent?
Hahahahahahahha
@@sachin2842भारत महासागर और भारत उप महादेश
@@fidenahmed2905 Speak English cant understand endhi
@sachin2842 Bharath ocean and Bharath subcontinent
German people also prefer to use Deutschland, Sri Lanka use to be Ceylon they refused to accept colonial name and changed it.
But we already have two names....
Its not name change, we are just using Bharat instead of India.
BTW india isn't colonial name
Robert Kiyosaki said professors are poor and stu pid people teaching young minds on how to be an employee. Well I see why. And, she using the word 'regime' and 'demonetization scandal' tells me what I need to know about her allegiance and if she is biased or not which she is i.e. tremendously left.
🎉😂
Kuch bhi
Sidha gaddar hii bol dete , itna mehnat kyu andhbhakt,,
😂
@@priyanshukushwaha6408 gddar
@@priyanshukushwaha6408 as u want. It's ur thought 🤷🏻♂️
Very biased view by expert
Hindu ~ Sanatan dharma and India~ Bharat
You should call guests who are actually knowledgeable. While some of what she says is true, most of her comments are slanted conspicuously towards the congress/left viewpoint and quite in line with her fake accent. Call someone more intelligent and balanced - you'll get better viewership.
turkey is now turkëiye too
Persia is now iran too
That girl doesn't know any thing about bharat, is she even a indian 😂
BRICS will lose its only vowel 😂
The "I" replace with Iran or Indonesia.
Best is her opinion about grouping opposition. All opposition has presence in different parts of India and they cannot add value to each other... Most of them contest against each other in state elections. Just wondering about the place she is working.. Professor 😂
its clear shes a bjp supporter..
@@fidelcatsro6948 Absolutely 100%
And who speaks about it a American funded lady who already know that USA can't allow this type of grouping but USA is still democracy in her opinion
India is poor not for europian loot india but also India's so called intellectual is Anti India
Why you are interviewing a person who do not stay in Bharat😂
Bharat Mata, Bharat Mata ki jai
Then Indonesia should be renamed as Jawa Negara.
Nusantara
Lol😂
Modi wants or citizens want it .
Why the change?
We love India as is ..😊
citizens wants it and possibly bharat govt too
@@SandeepPandey-hz7vo Name too ancient.. India is nice
@@tonykiang9052 india was given by colonizers which is a sign that you are still colonized
He wants money simple
WhatsApp university graduates
😂
People should understand its not a change its their in the constitution "India that is Bharat...." so kindly 🙏 😌 be quiet
kindly stop "flipping the prata"
so biased
If Indians really want to change the name of India to the old name of Bharat then Sikkim, Assam, Kashmir etc should be independent.
These states were never part of Bharat in the first place !
Yes, but failed countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan were part of Bharat so they should be included back into territories of bharat so not a loss after all.
yup you can... but remember you are about to deal with a nation having an army/navy/airforce and ICBMs and a large hub of Software developers... since historically annexation of a piece of land brings under the conqueorer's domain. So... try it...
@@shubhankardasgupta4777 Nobody is scared of India !
You take on China, that's be the end of India or Berak !
Many people in South India refer to India as "Bharath" or "Bharatham" in their native languages. Bharath has a greater significance in South Indian languages compared to North India. The Indian national pledge in most South Indian schools begins with the phrase "Bharath (Bharatham) is my country." A substantial amount of literary works in South India mention India as Bharath. Even the renowned Tamil poet who was born in 1882, known as Bharathiyar, derived his name from Bharath. Similarly, the great Malayalam poet Vallathol Narayana Menon, who wrote in 1917, expressed the significance of the names "Bharatham" and "Keralam."
In 1917, India was not yet a republic, and the state of Kerala did not exist. However, Vallathol Narayana Menon's words ignited a sense of pride among Malayalees and nurtured Indian patriotism. He also referred to India as Bharath.
The term "Bharath" finds its roots in the epic Mahabharata, where it is defined as a land situated between the sea and the snowy mountains, which aligns with India's geographical features-the Himalayas in the north and the Indian Ocean in the south. The Mahabharata war can be interpreted as a war in Greater India, involving kingdoms from South India, North East, Iran, Afghanistan, Northern, and Western India.
The Mahabharata provides genealogical information about South Indian kingdoms, tracing their origins from Turvasu. Maruttan, the sixth-generation king, was succeeded by Bharata and Andhra, born to his second wife Shakuntala. From Andhra's descendants came the Pandya, Chola, Chera, and Kuntala clans, which established the Pandya, Chola, Kerala, and Karnataka regions, respectively.
The Mahabharata itself acknowledges the participation of South Indian kings in the battle of Kurukshetra. For instance, Pandya king Sharngadhwaja, residing near the sea, joined Yudhishthira with a substantial army. Other references in the epic mention the valor of the Pandya and Chera kings in support of the Pandavas.
The Cera (Chera) King Utiyan Ceralatan's story of providing food for the entire army during the Kurukshetra war earned him the title "Perumcorrutiyan" or the "Great Feeder." While the epic doesn't explicitly mention him, it indicates that the battle of Kurukshetra was known to ancient Cera rulers.
Apart from South India, other kingdoms from Bharath also participated in the Mahabharata, such as the Kingdom of Gandhara, present-day Kandahar in Afghanistan.
Furthermore, certain elements of Hinduism, like snake worship, are prevalent in Kerala, Karnataka, and North Eastern states today. These practices have their origins in Myanmar and migrated to South India, resulting in the worship of Naga clans, as seen in Mahabharata references.
The epic Mahabharata also contains early references to the region of Manipur and Nagaland, with characters like Ulupi and Iravan identified as "Manipuris" and "Naga people." The term "Naga" is believed to be linked to the worshippers of snake gods.
Additionally, historical Hindu kingdoms like Kamarupa (350 to 1140 CE) and the Ahom dynasty (1228-1826) from North East India are mentioned in the context of the Mahabharata war, highlighting their people's participation and clans in the epic.
Finally, the Indian Constitution, in Article 1, begins with the statement, "India that is Bharat is a union of states," emphasizing the union of the two names "India" and "Bharat" to represent the nation.
Than Indonesia become Barathnesia 😅
What's the problem with getting rid of legacies from the colonial past?
Colonial past and symbols influence peoples and societies mindsets. I don't think any ex-colony can be truly free and become what they want without their own mindset.
And this is as important as other issues these countries are facing. Of course, people with a colonial mindset will think this is a waste of time and ridiculous.
Why must get rid of such legacies that have helped building up the nation ?
@@benkottoor Sorry Bharat encompasses everyone. It's only your colonial legacy mindset claiming Northeast states and Southern states are somehow out of it! Does the passport of all people regardless of region say Bharat Ganrajya? Yes
Then there is no issue. Keep this Dravidistan or Northeast different mindset out of this.
@@benkottoor Many people in South India refer to India as "Bharath" or "Bharatham" in their native languages. Bharath has a greater significance in South Indian languages compared to North India. The Indian national pledge in most South Indian schools begins with the phrase "Bharath (Bharatham) is my country." A substantial amount of literary works in South India mention India as Bharath. Even the renowned Tamil poet who was born in 1882, known as Bharathiyar, derived his name from Bharath. Similarly, the great Malayalam poet Vallathol Narayana Menon, who wrote in 1917, expressed the significance of the names "Bharatham" and "Keralam."
In 1917, India was not yet a republic, and the state of Kerala did not exist. However, Vallathol Narayana Menon's words ignited a sense of pride among Malayalees and nurtured Indian patriotism. He also referred to India as Bharath.
The term "Bharath" finds its roots in the epic Mahabharata, where it is defined as a land situated between the sea and the snowy mountains, which aligns with India's geographical features-the Himalayas in the north and the Indian Ocean in the south. The Mahabharata war can be interpreted as a war in Greater India, involving kingdoms from South India, North East, Iran, Afghanistan, Northern, and Western India.
The Mahabharata provides genealogical information about South Indian kingdoms, tracing their origins from Turvasu. Maruttan, the sixth-generation king, was succeeded by Bharata and Andhra, born to his second wife Shakuntala. From Andhra's descendants came the Pandya, Chola, Chera, and Kuntala clans, which established the Pandya, Chola, Kerala, and Karnataka regions, respectively.
The Mahabharata itself acknowledges the participation of South Indian kings in the battle of Kurukshetra. For instance, Pandya king Sharngadhwaja, residing near the sea, joined Yudhishthira with a substantial army. Other references in the epic mention the valor of the Pandya and Chera kings in support of the Pandavas.
The Cera (Chera) King Utiyan Ceralatan's story of providing food for the entire army during the Kurukshetra war earned him the title "Perumcorrutiyan" or the "Great Feeder." While the epic doesn't explicitly mention him, it indicates that the battle of Kurukshetra was known to ancient Cera rulers.
Apart from South India, other kingdoms from Bharath also participated in the Mahabharata, such as the Kingdom of Gandhara, present-day Kandahar in Afghanistan.
Furthermore, certain elements of Hinduism, like snake worship, are prevalent in Kerala, Karnataka, and North Eastern states today. These practices have their origins in Myanmar and migrated to South India, resulting in the worship of Naga clans, as seen in Mahabharata references.
The epic Mahabharata also contains early references to the region of Manipur and Nagaland, with characters like Ulupi and Iravan identified as "Manipuris" and "Naga people." The term "Naga" is believed to be linked to the worshippers of snake gods.
Additionally, historical Hindu kingdoms like Kamarupa (350 to 1140 CE) and the Ahom dynasty (1228-1826) from North East India are mentioned in the context of the Mahabharata war, highlighting their people's participation and clans in the epic.
Finally, the Indian Constitution, in Article 1, begins with the statement, "India that is Bharat is a union of states," emphasizing the union of the two names "India" and "Bharat" to represent the nation.
@@bobafett5757"built the nation" to loot all our resources and completely wipe out the wealth. Also, broke down the valuable wealth including temples, universities, libraries, Sanskrit education, etc.
Good decision of pm to change name India.
BHARAT is real name.
Calling singapore to Delhi as a guest to G20 was a mistake.
Bharat is referred in epics from thousands year back, used by locals since long. India is british given. So, india started going native.
Maybe u have to learn history
India name is used since bce it originated from Indus river lmao!!Learn history..Half knowledge is always dangerous
This woman is crying in pain 😂😂😂
Seriously speaking this is nothing but foolishness. Since BJP got nothing to do with economy, education, inflation, growth etc.etc. of the Country, they are doing what they only know. We can't blame them as well. They also have to engage in something that really they can do, right?
They try to hide manipur current situation in the coming election
So Indians are now called Bharats?
Bharatiyas.
I just want to hear the West or biden bharat pronunciation😂
Its not a change in name....even our government never said anything officially on this....its not discarding name India but promoting our glorious historic name Bharat
Linguistic analysis of 'Magadhi Helabasa' gives the meaning of 'Bharat';
Bahu(multi) +Ratta(countries-states) =>Bahuratta =>Bahratta =>Bharatta =>Bharat(Union of States).
Maha(big)+Bharat =Mahabharata: Great Union of States
‘Bharat’ could have been the common notion for the dynasty of emperors who ruled the subcontinent of multi states from the historic ages beyond 5000BP.
Bharat means the nation whose citizens are dwelling in the search for knowledge...
Rascal 😂
She keeps using terms like "regime" and not "the elected party". It is not an authoritarian.
Most of us knew what she stands for with Ghandi associate professor of political science.
No need to hesitate. India is a foriegn name. Maha Bharat is the most suitable and beautiful name that makes everyone proud with its 5000 + yr old history.
No offence, but it’s an ugly name especially if you are speaking in English. India is a foreign name I understand, but saying you came from a country of bharat just sounds so weird to us foreigners. India should just remain India for the western world and bharat should only be use by Indians as many Indians already do so already. If modi is going to change his country name internationally, there will be some mockery towards Indians.
@@davidmarjason4222 definitely it is different in different language. For example England means engpussy 😂😂 in hindi if u change it but people should not care. Because it's their country name. Bharatham is our name
@@JUSTFORFUN-cd5dd I think if modi decided to put bharatham and e thesis the ‘ham’ at the end, it may actually sound better or at least fuller. I think Bharat on its own just sound like some car brand, that’s just me.
@@davidmarjason4222no issues when Pakistan has its original name, all Christian cohntries have original names.. why not us
@@enigma533 you can have your original name but it will be mocked. The name just sound… I don’t know just doesn’t feel right. But that’s just me, but if India wants to change its name then change it. I don’t know how the international community will say, so do we refer you as Bharats? Instead of Indians?
Regime? That might be too biased. It is true that India is not a healthy democracy at the moment. A healthy democracy is one with a strong opposition that debates, keeps the government accountable and focused on the people. Currently, India doesn't have a strong opposition, an over-confident ruling government who wants to centralise all the power and homogenise the entire population under a single umbrella (ironically following China's footsteps) which for a country as diverse as India is not an easy exercise and is somewhat counter-productive. No country in the world can claim that they have had a perfect democracy at all times. India a rather young democracy is still trying to find its sweet spot.
I was also surprised. I imagine Bharat is not a perfect democracy... but still... Russia is much, much worse and I don't recall them using this kind of vocabulary.
Which country has a perfect system? Look at ones own backyard, most peoples of world are hardworking for better life etc. it takes a lifetime to do it .
But most politicians have own agenda with own their kind..Shameful n deceptive n the naive get used..
Wake up and make politicians work for the people
When democracy was kind of perfect , all the money was looted. It’s better to have a government that’s functioning than have a kind of perfect democracy and get looted all the way. … and the storey about centralised power is simple humbug… Center couldn’t control even BJP states like Karnataka …
Its no longer a Democracy, we term it as a Regime of Cowcracy under the current mandate of ruling power
U American? 50% of USA wealth in the hand of few person. Singapore style one party democracy is the best. Look at Malaysia every 5 years wanna change government and change plan, till die success in nonting. India want to change name is their biz. U want to change name to ke long or an neh also u biz.
Doesn't change its reputation.
Hilarious debate neither news anchor have any idea nor the guest
I suggest renaming it to Beejaypee Modiarat!
They consulting an Indian correspondent in Providence Rhode Island!
There is no news on aditya L1 launch and chandrayan 3 but you have time for this lame news bravo @CNA 👏
She’s an expert😂
To CNA, please bring someone knowledgeable she didn’t even mention article one once
Dear CNA,
The individual you invite for discussing foreign issue should hold unbiased views of events and portray public opinions as it is. But....
Prerna Singh , "Mahatma Gandhi" Professor of Pol Sc. & Intl Sc. 👈 this is clearly a case of laughable prejudice at Indian govt.
Though she showed too much of herself, don't forget dear CNA it has also shown your unripened media professionalism.
Does CNA have only one person who criticizes and does it does not have another professor who supports . And we hear about balanced view from these channels that can be paid by the China
When others do all good,when we do you have problem. When the last time you have shown Bharat positively.
She absolutely is disconnected frm reality as observed by Indians..
They followed twitter.
Bharatiya Janata is more nice. 🇮🇳
India losing investments under BJP..
@@fidelcatsro6948no investment are all time high.
@@fidelcatsro6948 😃😃
India has more hindu than bharat cus india and hindu both literally originated from same word Sindhu
Dont forget singapore has its origin in sanskrit. I dont understand why you want to cry for everything.
Biased news
India name came from Indus Valley, present day Pakistan. Once India changes to Bharat (aka Bad Rat), Pakistan can rightfully claim the india name.
It’s not only Indian call their country “Bharat” but also it’s neighboring countries call it “Bharat” as of now including arch rival Pakistanis.
Eagerly waiting for the Republic of Bharat passport.
This lady had little and fair understanding about India being in abroad she cant voice ground reality.. interviewer should invite correct scholar from India.. India was name imposed by British, Hindustan name imposed by Muslims.. and Bharat is named as ancient text mentioned and widely welcomed by Indians except sedu seculiar who dont understand emotions.. you take an example you named and was replaced by your employer to make impact to his wish and convinence .. whether will you accept
Good luck to all the money needed to implement this.
Name bharat is already there on passport, currency, stamps and in constitution already.. it's a Hindi word for india hence everything official document of India which is bilingual has word bharat in it ..
*If name changed to Bharat then the citizen will be called Bharian or Bharatian or Bharabrian ? So which one sounds better ?*
Bharatiyas.
I like Bharian.
@@anupamsatpathi2071 Sounds like Barista
It sounds so stupid to call myself Bhartiya in America 🤦♂️ I love being known as Indian. That's been my identity for 38 yrs! This is so ridiculous!!!
@@moeverma4991 ok, then call yourself American gora.
Just watched this video on the potential name change from "India" to "Bharat" and wanted to share some thoughts. Changing the name would mean adjusting its brand identity that has been globally recognized for centuries. Not to mention, the potential legal and diplomatic challenges, as international treaties would need updates. Economically, businesses everywhere would have to adapt, from their marketing to product labeling. Also, let's not forget our vast diaspora who identify strongly with the name "India." Historically, the name has roots going back to ancient civilizations like the Greeks and Romans. A change might inadvertently highlight regional or linguistic divides in our diverse nation. Educationally, textbooks and resources globally would require updates. And our tourism sector, especially the "Incredible India" brand, would face a massive rebranding task. While I respect the sentiment behind the proposal, it seems like there's a lot to consider. What does everyone else think? 🤔🌏🇮🇳
I strongly agree with you. Even if people say bharat is original, past is past so many people worldwide know the world "India" not "Bharat" even for me im just not used to saying Bharat it just sounds weird but when I say India I can say it comfortably and also thinking abt the businesses its just hard so its really better not to change the name these people are just thinking about the past history but they are not thinking about the future and the present they are only saying that because of sentiment so I totally agree with you.
Our name is HINDUSTAN and BHARAT
Two Beautiful news readers ❤️
If you fluent, that doesn’t make you smart 😂😂
It is already mentioned in the constitution of India.....this fool don't know anything about Bharat...
Shedding legacy of colonial past while still begging from neocolonial masters? Mind boggling 😵
What happened to the "unprecedented alliance"?
The Great Asia already told you many times that there is no India country in the history. The current India is British-India, which is assembled by the UK during the colonial era.
Ha ha ha!
And why this now? They had years and years to change... Such strange people 🤯😆
Nazis ideas from the current party ruling the country..
Before 2014 India was governed by non Hindus.
the name INDIA came from its colonizer .. us Filipinos also in talks to change our country name into maharlika “freedman” and replace our colonizers name but I don’t think it will push through just because we have more issues and problems to solve inside our country ..
"Bharata" literally means: "Bha" for bhava - the experience of life, "Ra" for raga - the tune of life, and "Ta" for tala - the rhythm of life. If you find the right rhythm, life happens beautifully. If you miss the rhythm, you get crushed by the process of life.
😂WhatsApp university
@@priyanshukushwaha6408very much true
*"Bha"* va + *"ra"* ga + *"ta"* la. = *"Bharata"* ❤️🙏🏻
Beautiful 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
Singapore should also be renamed to Singapura to remind the overstayers that their time here is up.
The old name for Singapore was Temasek. It was then changed to Singa Pura which means Lion City in sanskrit. The British after then just anglicized it to Singapore. No need to change since it's the same name.
@@kenhew4641 Just as India was a name given by the British. A name change is a good reminder to a particularly large immigrant community that Singapura is Nusantara land.
"overstayers" 😂 Claimers gonna claim.
@user-ug. Who a Singaporean is does not depend on you. Don't overrate yourself.
And why are you here?
Bharat❤🇮🇳
Bharat & Bollywood start with "B"
Mahaa #bharat 🇮🇳 ( The Great #bharat 🇮🇳)
This is funny .. someone who is not Indian and only has ethnicity as an Indian .. talking about things they have no idea.. please let that thing reside who are living in India/Bharat. You ladies want to ask then its better to send someone to India and ask... plus there is no change in passport or other IDs. It still says India in English and in Hindi it says Bharat and it is also mentioned in our constitution. We always had been been Bharatye (indian). so technically is never been different...maybe for you it is different.. for us who are still resident .. India/Bharat means same for us
India have 3 name
1. India itself
2.Bharat
3. Hindustan
Funny thing is that these 3 names still using worldwide .😂😅❤and indian constitution allow to use first two names.
Another funny thing is that if india changed to Bharat, it is very difficult to pronounce for English speaking countries and Europeans.
Only indians can pronouns it easier and correctly.
Even this anchor's pronouns on "Bharat" is not correct.
Sounded like "pa lan".... and reading it the other way around would definitely be more more helpful and easier for us to remember the new name.
"demonetization scandal!" really? I'm done with these foreign media outlets.
The 28th Treta Yuga Period (6777-5577 BCE)
7322 BCE List of Nakshatras starting from Ashvini. Winter Solstice shifted to Ashvini in 7322 BCE.
7322 BCE Counting of Chaturyugas of 20 years in a new series. Sun, Moon and Brihaspati were in conjunction at
Tishya = Pushya nakshatra at vernal equinox (on 24 May 7321 BCE)
6823 BCE The Second Tamil Sangam Period [6823-3123 BCE] (3700 years)
6782 BCE 27 Chaturyugas of 20 years elapsed and the 28th Kritayuga commenced in 6782 BCE.
6778 BCE Mayasura wrote Surya Siddhanta in 6778 BCE. All five planets, Sun and Moon were in a great
conjunction in Aries on 22 Feb 6778 BCE, Chaitra Shukla Pratipada and Sun was at the first degree of
Aries.
6777 BCE 28th Treta Yuga of 1200 years commenced. 12-year cycle and 60-year cycle were introduced.
6777 BCE First Saptarshi Cycle of 2700 years commenced
6773 BCE Introduction of Brahma Siddhanta Calendar and 6773 BCE was Prabhava Samvatsara
6500 BCE Upavedas were compiled. Yaska wrote Nirukta.
6000 BCE Compilation of Bharat Natya Shastra
5977 BCE Introduction of Vasishtha Siddhanta
5650 BCE Matanga Muni wrote Brihaddeshi
What a story..
😂
😂
😂
What a story..
😂
😂
😂
You have called someone who is an absolute idiot and doesn’t know anything at all.
Indian constitution says India that is Bharat
So it means the same thing just pronounced differently.. Like how Turkey changed it's name, it'll take awhile to get used to, is it needed? Would have made more sense if it was done as soon as the Brits left.
Her name Singh which is unusual. Should be Kaur
It’s means a lot don’t worry about us we will be fine with name change
India, Hindu, Hindi are all were termed by Persians which was named after river Indus(Persian). River is called Sindhu in Sanskrit (as in our National Anthem) . If we have to rename, we have to rename everything to Sanskrit like Sindhu, Sindian, Sindhi. And stop using the Persian words Hindi and Hindu.
Both India and Bharat is fine but this change is going to cost us several lakh crore rupees. Is this going to lift us from poverty. Our economy is already declining and we should do something productive to provide employment and to sort out Manipur and all communal issues first.
Diverting attention from more pressing issues before election 😢
The guests that CNA called is Indian American, not Indian(Bhartiya).
Man this women don’t know anything and doesn’t represent our country’s opinion. She think I.N.D.I.A alliance have a some chance winning😅.
I don’t see what’s the problem here.. India that is Bharat is mentioned in constitution.. may countries changed their names previously.. so why are you crying political analyst😂
In arabic bharat means spice
Yes it is possible
Renaming India to its former name BHARATH Is an internal affair.
Changes arr required to reassert and reinvent ones identify.
Economic sititauon not great ? It's one of the fastest growing economy.
Issues of the BJPs record? Please elaborate, as it's the most assertive Indian Government that as able to help India forge ahead economically .
The opposition can claim what they want but proof is in the pudding where the opposition has been self serving and never has put people at grass roots levels .
Under the BJP India has outperformed all these parties while taking pride in Indian identity that has been inclusive to bring prosperity to all
😂😂😂Professor is unaware of the fact that in the Constitution of India, first world that refers to Bharat that is India, so she does not know about India and comment unnecessarily.
She said india is a resource poor and economically weak nation of global south😱😱😱. Is she for real!!!!!. How is she even a prefosser
In any case, you guys could have asked someone with a little more gray matter in there. Really...
Indian people in general have no issue using Bharath. We are ok. So the opinion given by her has no value...
It has also nothing to do with elections.
Reducing LPG price has..
Prerna Singh always writes their articles against Modi government in many news houses