The 100 Year Flood Is Not What You Think It Is (Maybe)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • Today on Practical Engineering we're talking about hydrology, and I took a little walk through my neighborhood to show you some infrastructure you may have never noticed before.
    Almost everyone agrees that flooding is bad. Most years it’s the number one natural disaster in the US by dollars of damage. So being able to characterize flood risks is a crucial job of civil engineers. Engineering hydrology has equal parts statistics and understanding how society treats risks. Water is incredibly important to us, and it shapes almost every facet of our lives, but it’s almost never in the right place at the right time. Sometimes there’s not enough, like in a drought or just an arid region, but we also need to be prepared for the times when there’s too much water, a flood. Rainfall and streamflow have tremendous variability and it’s the engineer’s job to characterize that so that we can make rational and intelligent decisions about how we develop the world around us. Thanks for watching!
    FEMA Floodplain Maps: msc.fema.gov/portal
    USGS Stream Gages: maps.waterdata.usgs.gov/mapper...
    Watch this video and the entire Practical Engineering catalog ad-free on Nebula: go.nebula.tv/practical-engine...
    I use all Patreon earning to improve the quality (and quantity!) of videos: / practicalengineering
    practical.engineering
    Music: Doctor Vox - Gold ( • DOCTOR VOX - Gold [Roy... )

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @ethanely674
    @ethanely674 4 роки тому +250

    As a water resource engineer, I frequently have to explain the idea of the 100-year storm to people. I may just start showing this video instead! Nicely done.

    • @terrorhuhn9192
      @terrorhuhn9192 3 роки тому +7

      Few days ago in german was (for our conditions) a 100 year flood. About 160 ppl died in it.. was the second 100 year flood within 10 years tho, many people say stuff like "so, that was now 100 years already?" right now.. thats freaking annoying xD

    • @chriseffpunkt4333
      @chriseffpunkt4333 2 роки тому +1

      @@terrorhuhn9192 so, tbh, wouldnt it therefore be a decades flood?

    • @toomanymarys7355
      @toomanymarys7355 2 роки тому +2

      @@terrorhuhn9192 It's ALSO because the estimations are falsely based on bell curve probabilities. It's a total load of huey.

  • @TimmyBlumberg
    @TimmyBlumberg 8 років тому +368

    This is precisely the content that I WANT to watch on UA-cam, but am never quite able to track down.

    • @TheLychie
      @TheLychie 3 роки тому +1

      im a student in civil engineering and this dude just showed you how much we go through in water resources/hydraulics class

    • @TheLychie
      @TheLychie 3 роки тому

      @Alex Tyson sorry, didnt mean to sound arrogant in that comment. my intention was that it's cool yall got to see what we go through in class, that's all. I finished that class and I still dont know much!

    • @desijrichert
      @desijrichert 3 роки тому +1

      @Alex Tyson The proper terminology is "nobody cares Moby". LOL

  • @danielhutabarat7596
    @danielhutabarat7596 5 років тому +66

    I think you did our job as civil engineer in educating the society and inspiring young people. Never stop posting!

  • @CarthagoMike
    @CarthagoMike 3 роки тому +62

    As a Dutchman, this hits pretty hard today, with all the flooding.

    • @MrJeffcoley1
      @MrJeffcoley1 3 роки тому +7

      No worries mate - after it's done, you're good for 100 years!

    • @almerindaromeira8352
      @almerindaromeira8352 3 роки тому +3

      I also got this recommended. I live in Germany....

    • @Twiggy163
      @Twiggy163 2 роки тому +1

      @@MrJeffcoley1 1250 years for rivers. The Dutch learned long ago that 100 years is not enough.

  • @SquaresToOvals
    @SquaresToOvals 8 років тому +523

    That feel when 7 out of 9 of your friends in your standard deviation excel spreadsheet are made up

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +174

      Yeah, Duke Flitznippler is totally real...

    • @haph2087
      @haph2087 4 роки тому +46

      @@PracticalEngineeringChannel Charles. No last name, just Charles.
      Not convinced Made-Up Friend 5 and Made-Up Friend 6 are different people. Maybe they are clones.

    • @soup-flavored-soup6613
      @soup-flavored-soup6613 4 роки тому +8

      Pfft friends

    • @DiscoFang
      @DiscoFang 3 роки тому +12

      The technical term for friends is standard deviations.

    • @midnightclubII
      @midnightclubII 3 роки тому +4

      Duke F L I T Z N I P P L E R

  • @awboat
    @awboat 2 роки тому +53

    Another thing that really needs stressed is that "any given year" starts tomorrow. And another point, the flood plain is part of the river, just not always.

    • @buellb0y
      @buellb0y 2 роки тому +2

      Needs “ to be” stressed.🙄
      But yes, the flood plain IS part of the river.

    • @erisdiscordia5429
      @erisdiscordia5429 2 роки тому +3

      I love that your sarcastic comment about someone's typo is edited for corrections.
      lol well done, you're a true credit to the species.

  • @wxckefekt
    @wxckefekt 6 років тому +83

    "Good enough." - The entire methodology of my hydrogeology class.

  • @mokin-rui717
    @mokin-rui717 5 років тому +5

    I found these absolutely fascinating. The fact that you're a fellow Texan made me a subscriber.

  • @tysaquaticzone
    @tysaquaticzone 8 років тому +207

    I work for the USGS, was nice to see the recognition, thanks.

    • @nezZario
      @nezZario 8 років тому +6

      Not being mean, I've always heard the public sector is where you go when you can't cut it in the private. How true is that?

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +106

      Absolutely not true. Some of the sharpest engineers I've ever worked with were from public agencies like USGS, USBR, and USACE.

    • @jeffc5974
      @jeffc5974 7 років тому +24

      The public sector gets more scrutiny than anything in the private sector, because so many in the private sector rely on the information they provide. You're probably mistaking your experience at the DMV, which is a state thing, not a federal one.

    • @blackeyez5033
      @blackeyez5033 7 років тому +19

      Public or private, it all boils down to the individual's motivation to do the right thing

    • @krishankumarsanodiya7682
      @krishankumarsanodiya7682 4 роки тому +9

      I'm a Water Resources Engineer pursuing my master's. Most of my work is depend on the data collected from USGS. So thanks 👍

  • @teddyl7006
    @teddyl7006 8 років тому +377

    That was good. You didn't insult anyone's intelligence or tried to joke through the hard stuff.

    • @Azathoth43
      @Azathoth43 7 років тому +46

      Yup, left that to the comment section lol.

    • @beringstraitrailway
      @beringstraitrailway 5 років тому +5

      True, except for the part about taking selfies in front of your rain gauge, lol.

    • @General12th
      @General12th 5 років тому +5

      @@bobsagget823 Dude, what the hell?

    • @General12th
      @General12th 5 років тому +2

      @@w.o.jackson8432 If you look at the discussion tab on his channel, you'll see people have been leaving mean comments for _six years._ Either he's still quite young (and he started his channel when he was, like, ten) or he's been an asshole for a long, long time.

    • @mikegerig5363
      @mikegerig5363 5 років тому

      bobsagget823 .

  • @zachydrogeo
    @zachydrogeo 3 роки тому +11

    Grady: "we can't make everyone buy flood insurance"
    South Amboy NJ: hold my Bud Lite

  • @monham5041
    @monham5041 Рік тому +1

    Another clear and understandable explanation Grady.
    I love your videos.
    I've worked in the engineering industry for almost 40 years and it still amazes me how the general public view statistical base data.
    To most it seems that 1 in 100 year floods means that the chance of a flood happening in these zones is once every 100 years. Statistics are obviously not well understood.
    Keep making these clear and simple videos. Maybe the public will start to understand their environment better. 🤞

  • @apopheniacMCMLXXXIX
    @apopheniacMCMLXXXIX 8 років тому +90

    We need more UA-cam channels like this!

    • @armorsmith43
      @armorsmith43 7 років тому +6

      Starfish Prime look at Real Engineering, Wendover Productions, 1blue3brown, and The Engineer Guy

    • @pqrstzxerty1296
      @pqrstzxerty1296 4 роки тому

      UA-cam would still ban and remove them as its systems would see as it is reading material from a book becomes a copyright violation. Even humming a song UA-cam would remove it.

  • @rogermcdaniel7303
    @rogermcdaniel7303 8 років тому +16

    Very interesting video. As a CAD technician (Stantec Consulting,) focusing on water and wastewater facilities, I have often included flood plane data in drawings and (wrongly) assumed that it was "the worst flooding that has occurred in this area in the last 100 years". This was a excellent balance between presenting a "simplified" explanation without wandering into a "overly simplistic" one. This was a GREAT introduction to hydraulic engineering that has sparked my interest to looking into it a little further. Thanks much, and post more!

    • @timothyahoffman
      @timothyahoffman 7 років тому +3

      Going down the rabbit hole...... FEMA floodplain boundaries are more "easement" than engineering. If someone asks you to draw it and label the elevations make sure your surveyor checks the vertical datum on your plans first.

  • @reluctantlydancing
    @reluctantlydancing 2 роки тому +1

    This is so interesting. I grew up in Central Texas. In 1998, we had a 100 year flood, then in 2002, a 400 year flood. It was very confusing for me as a kid.

  • @Nonplused
    @Nonplused 6 років тому +6

    This same sort of misunderstanding of statistics happens in finance as well. For example many (most all I think) use a measure called "value at risk" to quantify the uncertainty in their portfolio. So for example after doing a bunch of highly dubious statistical work they may say that their value at risk is $5 million dollars with a 95% confidence interval and a 1-day holding period. So depending on how the confidence interval is defined, that can mean either 5% or 2.5% of the days will have a bigger loss than $5 million dollars. However nobody thinks about all the $4, $3, $2, and $1 million dollar losses that will encompass 50% of the days and can all get strung together if the market is against you. The 1 day holding period is key, if you cannot exit your position in 1 day the total losses from a market event can be well above the stated value at risk. A good rule of thumb is that if you can't get out of a position the total losses possible in a year are about 11 times higher than the stated value at risk, depending on the volatility and liquidity. And then because many financial and commodity markets are log-normal, the stuff inside the 5 or 2.5% can be dramatically larger than the stated value at risk. As the probability of occurrence is going down the impact is going up exponentially. This is how you get a bank failure or market crash. They don't happen very often, but when they do there is not much that can be done. Some very large trading shops have been taken down by events they thought couldn't happen based on statistics.

  • @MrRoboskippy
    @MrRoboskippy 8 років тому +280

    In this case the 100 year flood actually was what I thought it was.

    • @willievanhetkerkhof286
      @willievanhetkerkhof286 6 років тому +3

      Harvey is gone Irma is coming, every month a 100-1000 year risk.

    • @howardbaxter2514
      @howardbaxter2514 6 років тому

      Willie van het Kerkhof
      To hell with Harvey. May we never see another Harvey like hurricane again.

    • @e1123581321345589144
      @e1123581321345589144 5 років тому

      same here

    • @haph2087
      @haph2087 4 роки тому +9

      I don't understand why people would expect it to be anything different. When I first heard the term "100 years flood" I thought "The size of flood that would occur on average once per 100 years?". Admittedly I termed it that way in my head, not "the flood size with a 1% chance of occurring each year", though that is a fairly simple mathematical relation, and if asked for the chance per year I would have replied with 1%

    • @mennoltvanalten7260
      @mennoltvanalten7260 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah, same. Though I guess as a Dutch person I already have a larger than average reason to know this stuff.

  • @CapturePlay
    @CapturePlay 8 років тому +25

    Just found the channel through Hydraulic Press Channel and I'm loving it, immediately subscribed!
    Really well put together videos with fantastic pacing and a pleasing balance between the accessibility and depth of the content.

    • @VladVladislav790
      @VladVladislav790 8 років тому +8

      floods are dangerous and can attack at any time. We must deal with it

    • @IrchaMan
      @IrchaMan 7 років тому +1

      vat da fak!

  • @RowanHawkins
    @RowanHawkins 5 років тому +6

    The National Weather Service in the US also allows you to access the Hydrology Data because they also care about water flows in streams so they can issue flood watches and warnings. If you have a stream that floods often in your area, you are likely to have a flow gague on it someplace. Also Highway departments put data into the system, because many bridges essentially have a ruler built onto a pylon that is visible from shore. Some times those also mark record high water events.

  • @greenwolfx
    @greenwolfx 7 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video Grady.
    We all appreciate the effort you put into them 👍

  • @TheJoeOption
    @TheJoeOption 8 років тому +3

    Keep Making Cool Stuff!
    Studying Mech. Eng. in school right now, I really enjoy seeing these videos. It's a good reminder that engineering is more than just studying.

  • @NickFerry
    @NickFerry 8 років тому +173

    loving the new channel direction - keep it up!

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +33

      +Nick Ferry Thanks Nick! I want to feel your beard.

    • @NickFerry
      @NickFerry 8 років тому +11

      Practical Engineering lol - I wish that was the first time I have had that request

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +8

      +AvE taken?! It's always been there

    • @NickFerry
      @NickFerry 8 років тому +4

      ***** maybe too many pixeys

    • @K-Anator
      @K-Anator 8 років тому +5

      +Nick Ferry This chain of comments makes me happier than it should.
      Also, what's with people wanting to feel beards? I've been stroked a number of times, occasionally without consent.

  • @sbdragoo4463
    @sbdragoo4463 3 роки тому

    As a former civil engineer working with hydrology for bridge design, this is a fantastic video. Great explanation of the topic and the pieces that make this up. Keep up the great work. Your videos are informative and very entertaining!

  • @JohnHudert1
    @JohnHudert1 6 років тому

    Great vid!
    Liked the selfie shot with the rain gauge (I do that too) and the last shot of skipping a stone - always good to feel like I'm back out on the river.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @opnorty
    @opnorty 8 років тому +5

    Great video. As a fellow civil engineer, I have to explain this all the time. The other confusing issue for lay people is the 1% flood vs the 1% storm and why they dont occur during corresponsing rain events... Keep up the great work.

  • @johnconklin9039
    @johnconklin9039 8 років тому +32

    Don't know how many times that I've tried to explain 100 year storms to people, I never do as well as you. Maybe someday explain retention basins and metered outfall. Don't know if that's in the code in Texas, but here in Ohio they've been a big part of the building code for about the last 20 years.

    • @waterman308
      @waterman308 6 років тому +2

      been doing basins here in NJ since the 50's or so. we'e elevated it to a level of requiring some kind of Mage to figure out how to make them do all the regulatory requirements - water quality, erosion control, infiltration, flood control. Yikes!

    • @matthewlehman7937
      @matthewlehman7937 5 років тому +1

      Hi, I'm a civil engineer specializing in water resources, I've never heard of "metered outfall," what does that mean?

    • @carmichaelmoritz8662
      @carmichaelmoritz8662 5 років тому +2

      i am so stupidd that i dont really understand most of what he said . certain things just make sense while the other stuff is just extra words added to make it sound professional .

  • @hfyaer
    @hfyaer 5 років тому

    You've improved your editing a lot. And I like your humor. Even if it's weird, it's genuine. It is part of the world of top level engineers that you're exposing.

  • @tylerjones2407
    @tylerjones2407 7 років тому

    Thank you so much for making this video! I have heard people talk about the 100 year flood, and completely misunderstood it. Your explanation was very clear and interesting!

  • @TheJaredtheJaredlong
    @TheJaredtheJaredlong 8 років тому +6

    Mies van der Rohe built the Farmsworth House to sit right on the edge of the 100 year flood plain. Then for good measure, he raised the entire house 5 feet of the ground. Since it's completion,, it has been hit by two 500 year floods causing massive damage to the house.

  • @jonanderson7344
    @jonanderson7344 5 років тому

    Hey Grady, I just found your channel last night and Im getting obsessed with watching your videos. I just started my 3rd semester as an engineering student here in Virginia. I've only been here for about 2 years, but I was born and raised it Manchaca so it was cool to find out that you're a fellow Austinite. Thank you very much for your videos!

  • @LD-qj2te
    @LD-qj2te 5 років тому +1

    This is what makes the internet, shared learning and collaboration and cooperation awesome!
    Thank you for adding to the body of knowledge ! This is a great point you should expand on ideas such as black swan or six sigma events!

  • @peterbaston4370
    @peterbaston4370 8 років тому +37

    A great example of dynamic teaching using web technology will replace standard engineering courses. Comprehension is everything : )

  • @CalvinoBear
    @CalvinoBear 8 років тому +6

    I KNEW IT! In one of your other videos I saw a highway underpass that looked very familiar... From Austin, you are!

  • @dreambydesign808
    @dreambydesign808 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, thank you for explaining this. I do work as a junior architect and consistently find myself throwing basic property information like this on my general sheets. I didn't fully understand the difference between the flood plains (you would think we'd touch on it at uni at some point). Either way, I respect the work our Civil and Geotech consultants do--this was a great example of how their expertise is necessary--and allows me to do my work.

  • @albertlert
    @albertlert 6 років тому +2

    Dude, your presentation is sweet to listen to. You have a fab (and calming) voice ;)

  • @geoffreyreeks2422
    @geoffreyreeks2422 8 років тому +7

    This presentation is well done.
    It would be very helpful for engineers to understand the changes to hydraulic head by flows into and through storm water pits. I think that a lot of unexpected flooding occurs because we have built storm water pits that aggravate hydraulic head. If you do a report on this topic them please tell me. I am easy to find. Thanks.

  • @danhammond9066
    @danhammond9066 7 років тому +3

    I have been there and done that. After living thru a 100 year flood, seeing my entire city go under water. I know exactly what it is. Further I know what it is to deal with the aftermath, the cleanup, the destruction to families heirlooms. The pain and the healing.By far the clean up and getting back to life is the hardest part of a 100 year flood.

  • @sharedknowledge6640
    @sharedknowledge6640 6 років тому

    Awesome video and especially applicable with Houston, hurricane Irma, etc. You do a really good job of presenting concise explanations striking a good balance between the technical side and using layman' terms.

  • @shabadooshabadoo4918
    @shabadooshabadoo4918 4 роки тому +1

    Rofl that 2 second clip of you taking a selfie was a brilliant treasure of comedy that I hope everyone payed attention to.

  • @TheBookDoctor
    @TheBookDoctor 8 років тому +22

    I think you forgot the link to the FEMA flood plain maps. Great video, though. Very interesting!

  • @matachamoco
    @matachamoco 8 років тому +13

    The 100 year flood reminds me of a principle we use in electronics engineering called "mean time between failures". I've seen it mostly used to describe for measuring the failure rate for latching an asynchronous digital signal, where failure is when the latch goes metastable (i.e. oscillates between 0 and 1 by itself).
    The units are in time, but it really reflects a probability that it would fail, e.g. we want the mean time to be in days or years, but all that really means is we wan the probability of failure to be in the parts per billion/trillion.

    • @musaran2
      @musaran2 6 років тому +1

      MTBF is also common on hard disks.
      And it can be quite misleading, because it turns out HD typically fail young or live old, so combining those lifespan does not make that much sense.

    • @LucarioBoricua
      @LucarioBoricua 4 роки тому +2

      When politicians and concerned voters see the bill of the flood protection projects needed, or how many people/businesses/industries/facilities must be evicted out of the floodway, and how much land would be needed elsewhere to relocate all the affected activities, they'll shriek in pain and agony and sweep the problem under the rug.
      That is, until the problem starts costing dozens to hundreds of billions of dollars per year, every year. As it's happening with climate change inducing more extreme weather and sea level rise giving more inland reach to coastal storms.
      For instance, the US Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating the feasibility of constructing flood defenses for Galveston bay and the Houston Shipping Chanel. Price tag? $90 billion. Cost of Hurricane Harvey (2017)? $125 billion. When did the next nasty storm happen? Tropical storm Imelda, 2 years later.

    • @MonkeyJedi99
      @MonkeyJedi99 4 роки тому

      I first encountered MTBF in the military, where weapons and vehicles, as well as other major equipment, was listed with MTBF (or MRBF - Mean Rounds Before Failure) to give the unit quartermaster working estimates of how much to order, and when.

  • @jameswyatt1304
    @jameswyatt1304 5 років тому

    Thank you for a good link to share with friends. Your videos are an interesting and efficient use of time, though I'm glad I can replay parts of it a few times when it's deep, so to speak. Approachable engineering and science material is a wonderful thing to share.

  • @fuurinkazan164
    @fuurinkazan164 Рік тому

    Grady, I just discovered you a couple of years ago and now going back to watch your old videos. Your production value has increased a lot (not saying this to downplay your older videos but you're definitely getting better at your craft!).

  • @supernova4562
    @supernova4562 6 років тому +13

    Missed a chance for a pun at 7:04: "[water] shapes every facet of our lives" and faucet of our lives!

  • @cirurginn
    @cirurginn 7 років тому +24

    5:00 hey pervert why are you recording me?
    I was recording the stream gages I swear!
    tell that to the police

    • @mrnice88x
      @mrnice88x 5 років тому

      haha she looked over too

  • @xavierhenriques1116
    @xavierhenriques1116 3 роки тому +2

    I adore this channel
    You are one of the reasons I have decided to go back to school and finish my engineering degree
    Thank you, Sir 🙏

  • @moonlightboiii
    @moonlightboiii 5 років тому

    Hi! Really appreciate this video. Thanks for makin it!

  • @KingdomOfDimensions
    @KingdomOfDimensions 8 років тому +8

    The number of dislikes on your video really doesn't matter, and as long as your video isn't factually incorrect, uninteresting to the point of tedium, or a controversial opinion, you're unlikely to have more than a few percent dislikes. Inviting the audience to honestly represent their feelings about a video using the like/dislike buttons or by leaving a comment is more endearing than directing them to hit "like" regardless, and won't negatively affect the outcome.

  • @jelmerth
    @jelmerth 3 роки тому +4

    Can the past floods in Germany, Belgium, Austria be in this line? Nobody expected this.

    • @patrickspendrin3107
      @patrickspendrin3107 3 роки тому +1

      Obviously. The problem with floodings is: the higher the flood level is, the less likely it is to occur. if you look at a 1000 year period, then you'd see that certain flood levels are reached 10 times in that period - that is the 100year flood level. From a single event, you can't tell that easily though. There are problems with this statistical analysis though because various boundary conditions have changed over time (climate, think of the small ice age in central europe), building density (especially in such highly populated areas like the rhine-valley), river straightenings... And what you have to remember: a 100 year flood occurs around once in a life time. There is a high chance that there is nobody alive to tell you about it. For comparison the flood level markings at Schloss Pillnitz: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Hochwasserstand_Pillnitz_Schloss.jpg You can clearly see that the last flood before 2002 was 150 years ago. There simply was nobody alive anymore to speak about it. I think the same happened for the floods in rhine region this year.

    • @TheSmiley316
      @TheSmiley316 2 роки тому +1

      It's only for Americans, they don't think there is anyone else other then them

  • @Ratlins9
    @Ratlins9 6 років тому

    Thank you, your explanation gave me a much better understanding of flood plains and the 100 year flood. This will help me determine where I relocate. Your videos are the best!

  • @texw4062
    @texw4062 3 роки тому +2

    5:00 I really appreciate the beauty of this stream guage.

  • @chasemixon6327
    @chasemixon6327 8 років тому +55

    that just made my brain hurt... but good stuff.

    • @thekittulegend
      @thekittulegend 7 років тому +1

      Chase Mixon he feeds information too quickly and often does not explain much about a concept and rushes to the next one.

    • @misterdinner3648
      @misterdinner3648 7 років тому +6

      new2k16rapper Pretty much how lectures work in higher education.

    • @Huyvovo903
      @Huyvovo903 7 років тому +6

      The information he presented was very bare-bone. Explaining every single concept in this video would take hours assuming the viewers have the basic knowledge of fluid mechanics.
      And no this is not how lectures woke in higher ed, it's meant for an audience with little to no knowledge regarding the subject. He barely went over any math except for some basic statistics and rudimentary formulas.

    • @gigglesgaming6362
      @gigglesgaming6362 6 років тому +3

      Basically all you need to know is that take the phrase "x year flood". Take that x and put it in the fraction 1/x and then convert that fraxtion to a percentage. So a 100 year flood would be 1/100 which equals 1%. The larger the x the least likely it will flood in that area

  • @FlatBlack_240LSX
    @FlatBlack_240LSX 5 років тому +3

    @5:02 I ride my bike by that gauge every day on my way to work!

  • @hudsonevans485
    @hudsonevans485 6 років тому

    Yo! Travis County whats up! I grew up there, but now I'm in Atlantis (Houston). It's so cool to see local (somewhat) people creating amazing videos like this that are viewed by thousands of people across the world. Btw totally agree with changing the x-amount year flood system to an x-percent chance system, I was a little confused on why they used that terminology in my civil engineering classes last year. Can't wait to see the next video!

  • @RavenTreasures
    @RavenTreasures 6 років тому

    Thank you this was informative and you broke it down just right. I am trying to learn one new thing a week or so. Keep up the good work.

  • @andrefu4166
    @andrefu4166 7 років тому +3

    I've watched your channel for a while now, and I'm loving all the information (for an engineer to be)! What type of Basin Modelling software did you use? Secondly, how did you model the Flood Map Service? Thanks!

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  7 років тому +1

      Thanks. For this video, I didn't perform any modeling. I was just showing some examples. There's a link to the FEMA map service in the description.

    • @andrefu4166
      @andrefu4166 7 років тому

      What program did you use to show those examples? Thanks again!

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  7 років тому +2

      HEC-SSP and HEC-HMS

  • @tzisorey
    @tzisorey 6 років тому +5

    And with recent happenings in Texas, this video has made it's way in to the Recommended Videos again.

  • @waywoodbiz
    @waywoodbiz 5 років тому +1

    Now I need to get a rainfall gauge so I can check it obsessively and brag to my friends.
    Excellent video.

  • @PradeepSingh-br4gd
    @PradeepSingh-br4gd Рік тому

    I have always been curious about all the stuff we see everyday, your book is the best thing I found this year. Keep up the good work .

  • @briansmobile1
    @briansmobile1 3 роки тому +9

    Fish jumps in foreground → 0:43

    • @dcgo44r
      @dcgo44r 3 роки тому

      Good eye! Fisherman? Lol.

    • @jo-gu4ln
      @jo-gu4ln 3 роки тому

      thank uou

  • @John_Ridley
    @John_Ridley 8 років тому +226

    Mmm, that is actually exactly what I thought the 100 year flood was. The only people confused were the people who think that they can be "due" when gambling or something.

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +27

      More people would probably think they were "due" for it if they called it a 26-roll dice throw. It's a terminology issue.

    • @SentientTent
      @SentientTent 7 років тому

      26 roll?

    • @ericv00
      @ericv00 7 років тому +31

      They should call it "the 100-sided die roll". In this case, a critical fail being a flood. ...And a critical success being that you become a hydromancer.

    • @thorr18BEM
      @thorr18BEM 7 років тому +22

      It seems a lot less crazy to believe there might be cyclical behaviors in nature than in the behavior of dice. This is especially true since we *know* the days, months, years, and seasons are cyclical as are less well known phenomena like earth's axis precession, the sun's 11-year cycle, a possible 105-year cycle seen in carbon-14 studies, and more. It's not just astrologists or gambling junkies who might think a "100-year flood" probably refers to something cyclical, even if it doesn't.

    • @TheCptCoy
      @TheCptCoy 7 років тому

      Yeah dumbasses be dumb as usual.

  • @michaelagius6814
    @michaelagius6814 6 років тому +1

    I work in the Engineering Department in Bridgeport Connecticut City Hall. I get people in my office all the time complaining about being in a flood zone and saying "I've lived there 30 years and I've never been flooded!" Now I'll just show them this video to save myself some time of explaining. Thanks!

  • @chinoYochino
    @chinoYochino 5 років тому

    Thanks for the nice video. I just studied NRCS TR-55 at my hydrogy class and this video really helped me understand a lot!

  • @andrewfrey6960
    @andrewfrey6960 6 років тому +3

    The fact that this video appeared on my feed right after Hurricane Harvey.

  • @davidjohnson4669
    @davidjohnson4669 7 років тому +38

    Well you got my sub easy information to digest on a curiosity click :3

    • @chriss3948
      @chriss3948 6 років тому +1

      I couldn't have agreed more. Guy seems to have his shit in one basket, I enjoyed it really.

    • @BRollOffroad
      @BRollOffroad 6 років тому

      this is my third vid, glad i found this.

    • @angelkitty11
      @angelkitty11 6 років тому

      :3

  • @buckshot70737
    @buckshot70737 6 років тому

    Thank you so much for the video. I have experienced catastrophic flooding many times in my life. This video gives a great perspective of how many variables come into play in circumstances that cause flooding. Thank you.

  • @Iamconnorlee
    @Iamconnorlee 7 років тому

    these videos have so much content and you actually learn something. and can take notes if you want to actually remember

  • @thetheflyinghawaiian
    @thetheflyinghawaiian 8 років тому +20

    Woo woo, Hydrology major represent.

    • @thetraveljack
      @thetraveljack 7 років тому +6

      AdamOrnelles usually you need a masters for hydrology

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie 3 роки тому +4

    It's nice that it comes today in my recommendation. Is it because of the events in Germany?

    • @almerindaromeira8352
      @almerindaromeira8352 3 роки тому

      I also got it (again) in the recommendations. Grüße aus Hamburg

    • @terrorhuhn9192
      @terrorhuhn9192 3 роки тому

      probably that's the reason..
      algorithms hits u xD

    • @DaHitch
      @DaHitch 2 роки тому

      The algorithm works in both mysterious and predictable ways.

  • @nickpetersen5934
    @nickpetersen5934 7 років тому

    Yo, not even done with the video and I subbed. Great stuff. Really gets me psyched to become an engineer.

  • @ninjapancakes9435
    @ninjapancakes9435 4 роки тому

    This is one of if not the first video that decently explains storm water concepts! Thank you so much! You should make a video on what a Storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is! ;) (Thats what I needed to learn, usually I look to UA-cam to learn about stuff I have no idea on, but there was almost nothing on the subject which was kinda disappointing because it is something that is important to consider. Ive been subed for awhile so this was a pleasant surprise! Thanks for all of your hard work.

  • @bernardo00124719
    @bernardo00124719 7 років тому +64

    5:04 nice.

    • @KarlBunker
      @KarlBunker 6 років тому +13

      Yeah; gotta love that stream gauge. 😉

    • @noahway13
      @noahway13 6 років тому +2

      7:39

    • @weaslemin7728
      @weaslemin7728 6 років тому +1

      Bruh.

    • @liu408
      @liu408 6 років тому +1

      haha I was gonna say that too #buns

    • @Superlokkus5
      @Superlokkus5 5 років тому +5

      I knew that comment would be here

  • @GeoffreyVonbargen
    @GeoffreyVonbargen 7 років тому +6

    ha, Civils, with your using imperial units, and you're huge estimations, and your concrete canoes.

    • @ShaneDGri
      @ShaneDGri 6 років тому +1

      Geoffrey Vonbargen and providing clean safe potable water to your house that conveniently comes out of a tap that you can turn on and off at will. Then to 'tap' it off (sorry couldn't resist) we'll also provide you with a convenient way to remove your wastewater and treat it for you.
      Thank you Civ Eng.

    • @JustCheckingMusic
      @JustCheckingMusic 6 років тому +1

      Imperical units is not something typical to this field of research. More like geographical *uche* the USA *uche*

  • @AdmiralJT
    @AdmiralJT 6 років тому +1

    Something wonderful about watching videos that deal with things I deal with and have to design around at work.
    Ah rational method, hydroflow. So much storm water design in some areas for well pad design.

  • @ShahrukhKhan-jy4ly
    @ShahrukhKhan-jy4ly 4 роки тому

    I really appreciate that you share quality engineering videos for young aspirants to learn and design future communities.

  • @AUSTINBGRANT
    @AUSTINBGRANT 8 років тому +4

    What's the probability of a 100 year storm occurring in a 100 years if it's normally distributed? The answer is not obvious.

    • @PracticalEngineeringChannel
      @PracticalEngineeringChannel  8 років тому +13

      The probability of having exactly one 100 year storm in 100 years is 37%. The probability of having at least one 100 year storm in 100 years is 63%. This is application of binomial statistics if you want to learn more.

    • @AUSTINBGRANT
      @AUSTINBGRANT 8 років тому

      That is correct, thank you! I love your channel and have watched all the videos today and study civil engineering myself.

    • @Kevin-ci1uo
      @Kevin-ci1uo 8 років тому

      IIRC an event with probability 1/p happening exactly once in P trials is always ~63% which I think is a pretty fun fact.

    • @Angel33Demon666
      @Angel33Demon666 8 років тому

      +Kevin Markielowski Isn't this the geometric distribution?

    • @Kevin-ci1uo
      @Kevin-ci1uo 8 років тому +2

      Angel33Demon666​ man its been a while since college! A geometric distribution is basically, "how many until" whereas a binomial is "how many in x" they are very closely related. In my example above its probably of 1 "successes" in p years, so you can use binomial, I think you can also use geometric because some factors will cancel out.

  • @exceisior3145
    @exceisior3145 6 років тому +10

    >engineering
    >users imperial measurements

  • @willtngl
    @willtngl 7 років тому

    This was really interesting. I am an architecture student and currently my class is working on projects in an area with several rivers. We were told to consider the 100 year flood plain and have all the data for it, but it was never explained to us how it worked. I kind of assumed more or less correctly, but this video really cleared up the uncertainty I had.

  • @diannelinam2407
    @diannelinam2407 7 років тому

    Very interesting video! I live in a flood plain area and did my own work determining our risk on a new home. I had the advantage of having the TVA as a great resource. Thanks for this excellent video!

  • @ef2b
    @ef2b 4 роки тому +5

    Physicist here: Measuring something to 1% is no walk in the park. This is even more true when you're talking about understanding the shape of a distribution out in the 1% tails. Even if you have a theoretical basis for the shape of the distribution, the 1% tails are generally mucked up by instrumentation effects, noise, background, etc., etc. So, if you think the technical parts of this seemed hard, I suspect it is even harder than it appears while, simultaneously, requiring a substantial amount of prayer and a fair bit preparing to run to high ground anyway. Nice video!

  • @MrDreamTV
    @MrDreamTV 8 років тому +17

    5:02 Nnnice

  • @ralphbyers6136
    @ralphbyers6136 4 роки тому

    Love all of your videos, Grady!

  • @jamesgarrison6430
    @jamesgarrison6430 5 років тому

    Meme a killer ass videos in the sense of they're informative and they're fun to watch keep it up man you put it all together really nice and really well

  • @keenanpepper
    @keenanpepper 8 років тому +4

    Oh, so the 100-year flood actually IS what I thought it was.

  • @JLPicard1648
    @JLPicard1648 8 років тому +4

    7:37 missing closed parenthesis

    • @micahgruenwald9321
      @micahgruenwald9321 8 років тому +3

      Thank you so much for saying that! I'm so glad you pointed that out!

  • @syedamarzia8736
    @syedamarzia8736 7 років тому

    i wish i had seen this video when we studied engineering hydrology last year . thanks a lot . u made my concept more clear.

  • @christopping5876
    @christopping5876 3 роки тому

    As a hydrologist, that is a beautifully put together video. Essential watching for all engineers and Earth scientists in this field. Thank you.

  • @anton9004
    @anton9004 7 років тому

    This was a very helpful video. Thank you, and keep up the great work!

  • @aplcc323
    @aplcc323 6 років тому

    After 7/8 videos, you Sir have me subscribed (: Amazing content and integrated mathematical knowledge, I am very happy to have found you

  • @KyAk_
    @KyAk_ 7 років тому

    Crazy good video man! You earned my sub!

  • @TheMrBrendo
    @TheMrBrendo 3 роки тому

    Such great content, keep up the great work!

  • @cirdiam1800
    @cirdiam1800 6 років тому

    Great video - as usual. Keep up the good work.

  • @lilgremlin6222
    @lilgremlin6222 7 років тому

    This helped me alot with the lake Ontario flooding thx man

  •  5 років тому

    This is inspirational

  • @Merennulli
    @Merennulli 2 роки тому +1

    The incidence rate is probably a good idea. We definitely had news reporters mis-explaining the 500 year flood when I was young. I think they were told it was expected to be a 100 year flood before turning out to be a 500 year flood, but I distinctly recall a news report saying the 500 year and 100 year floods overlapped as if the water worked like cicadas.

  • @AndrewOgden
    @AndrewOgden 5 років тому

    Thanks for all of the work you do for this channel, it's very interesting content.

  • @sidkemp4672
    @sidkemp4672 7 років тому

    Thanks.This is an unusually clear explanation of engineering, statistics, social risk, and law in one video. Keep at it!

  • @vincentbussiere1740
    @vincentbussiere1740 2 роки тому

    Love your videos! Help me understand so many things I otherwise wouldn't.

  • @JaneGraeSmithy
    @JaneGraeSmithy 4 роки тому

    I find your videos valuable, informative and well produced. Thanks for your efforts. Please keep it up.

  • @juanm.bonilla1896
    @juanm.bonilla1896 6 років тому

    Great video!
    Keep doing this!!!