I thought it was okay there were some scenes that I would remove (like the bed fort scene) but waiting for it for like 9 years made my expectations lower so I liked it more than. I thought I would
The people that gave it a low rating honestly don't understand fnaf, they thinked that it was going to be just a horror movie, but (like in the games) it focuses more in story than actually scaring you. And they surely don't understand that, i honestly think the movie was AWESOME and i need to watch it again with other friends.
I think a lot of fans are kinda huffing a lot of copium with the quality of the movie. While yes, there’s a lot to like from a fan perspective, it’s important to not view the movie through rose-tinted glasses and judge it not only as a love letter/adaptation of the source material, but as its own standalone thing. And unfortunately, the movie is not good enough as it’s own thing to be anything but painfully mediocre. And yet there’s so many fans that blind themselves thinking it’s another Mario movie when it’s more a hodgepodge of Michael Bay’s Transformers or the POSTAL movie in terms of actual quality.
As someone who loved fnaf from the beginning but then fell off after sister location, i think the movie was okay for what it was suppose to do, But i think fnaf deserved a better movie. They shouldve focused more on the thrilling horror aspect and then bring in the lore with the second movie.
The problem is that too many of the Rotten Tomatoes critics do not fully understand the game franchise and are just judging it like your average scary movie, that is why it is getting so much hate. the people who both know of the scary media and the franchise are probably the best people to judge it fairly but not many in the' '' professional'' media have that experience if any at all.
True man, people that didn't play the game and are just watching for the hype really just think that they can give a criticism about the movie without understanding the story or the easter eggs, i would honestly give this movie a 10/10. It's exactly what the community would like (in my opinion).
I played the original FNAF as well as 2 and 3 not the rest tough as this back when it came out like 2015 ish i think, So i can understand the criticism as the dialogue is cheesy and the scares are lackluster but at the same time, you can tell the people behind did their hw and pay a lot of respect to the fans of the game. I think the best approach going into it is to think it like those oddball b-movie scary movies that used to come out in 80s and 90s, its good for a laugh and turn off your brain but it wont win an academy award for best film lol@@Dripfarted overall i would give it like a B- Flawed but Good it just needs more polish and balance is all.
i went in knowing i probably wasnt going to like it because i never played fnaf and didnt like it but i do see the appeal to someone who does like fnaf which are the target audience for the movie
i wasnt a fnaf fan getting into the movie (went with a friend) (i had some background knowledge due to fandom osmosis and having friends over the years really into it so i wasnt totally clueless) and i had mentally rated it a like 6.5-7/10. and then i got into fnaf after and upon rewatch, i gave it a 9/10
The main and biggest problem that I have with the movie is that it's not scary, or even uncanny, not in the slightest, while being an adaptation of prolly the scariest game of the series ..the 1st game. And, with the new interview with Scott in mind, I see why. By trying too hard to make the animatronics seem innocent - it lost its sauce. I think Paranormal Investigation by Spectre did it best, still scary as shit, but when you think twice about what's going on - the animatronics are not malicious. The movie just had a wrong direction, way too sterile, way too clean. Willy's Wonderland > FNaF World The Movie. Bet if Willy's was a thrown out FNaF movie script, Nicolas Cage was doing the "Die In a Fire" moment.
the movie topic is sort of complicated, because while yes it was made with the fans in mind first and foremost, it should've also maybe paced itself better, actually did something with the horror. like fnaf isn't scary on surface level, and they had the chance to put the focus on the MCI and imo the scenes with the kids were some of my favorites. I know mike's story had to be center point but that's the thing!! mike's story in the games was focused on the tragedies of freddy's AND his family (mostly due to william's connection to them) i feel like they were just a bit too ambitious (since there's alot of cut scenes) or maybe they just weren't sure what approach to take with the IP. hopefully! they do better with the 2nd movie (and possibly 3rd 👀?) like balance between general audience and fans. also damn i need to turn on notifs for you because we keep missing your vids lol
Hit that bell! Yeah!!!!!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Also whats your opinion on the Springlock scene? I personally liked that it was there, but I don't feel like they went far enough with it
@@UltiNateum So funny story, we got sick. Hence why the reply is so delayed lol. I get what you mean, I wish it dragged on longer but then again, I wish Afton had more screentime in the movie in general. For what it's worth, it was still very cool. Went absolutely nuts when he said his iconic line too
I watched the movie as a fnaf fan with friends that werent i kept having to explain lore and they seemed legitimately interested one said "holy shit why is the lore so deep" good thing for a couple of stoners but at the end i said it first this movies great for fans kinda mid for people that dont know anything and they all agreed the part where they have a e.t moment lost everyone even me as a fan (understanding these are children after all obviously they wanna play and have fun) after that part all the suspense was gone
I thought it was okay there were some scenes that I would remove (like the bed fort scene) but waiting for it for like 9 years made my expectations lower so I liked it more than. I thought I would
BED fort scene??
The people that gave it a low rating honestly don't understand fnaf, they thinked that it was going to be just a horror movie, but (like in the games) it focuses more in story than actually scaring you. And they surely don't understand that, i honestly think the movie was AWESOME and i need to watch it again with other friends.
The movie was advertised as horror.
What a shit take💀💀
Blumhouse hyped it up as a action packed horror film 🤷
@@MiguelReis-b9m ok??? and they focused more on the story, that's why it has a low rating, that's what im trying to say
@@UA-camr-xp2bv true, but if you really know the fnaf franchise you would've known that the movie would have more story than spooks
I think a lot of fans are kinda huffing a lot of copium with the quality of the movie. While yes, there’s a lot to like from a fan perspective, it’s important to not view the movie through rose-tinted glasses and judge it not only as a love letter/adaptation of the source material, but as its own standalone thing. And unfortunately, the movie is not good enough as it’s own thing to be anything but painfully mediocre. And yet there’s so many fans that blind themselves thinking it’s another Mario movie when it’s more a hodgepodge of Michael Bay’s Transformers or the POSTAL movie in terms of actual quality.
As someone who loved fnaf from the beginning but then fell off after sister location, i think the movie was okay for what it was suppose to do, But i think fnaf deserved a better movie. They shouldve focused more on the thrilling horror aspect and then bring in the lore with the second movie.
The problem is that too many of the Rotten Tomatoes critics do not fully understand the game franchise and are just judging it like your average scary movie, that is why it is getting so much hate. the people who both know of the scary media and the franchise are probably the best people to judge it fairly but not many in the' '' professional'' media have that experience if any at all.
True man, people that didn't play the game and are just watching for the hype really just think that they can give a criticism about the movie without understanding the story or the easter eggs, i would honestly give this movie a 10/10. It's exactly what the community would like (in my opinion).
I played the original FNAF as well as 2 and 3 not the rest tough as this back when it came out like 2015 ish i think, So i can understand the criticism as the dialogue is cheesy and the scares are lackluster but at the same time, you can tell the people behind did their hw and pay a lot of respect to the fans of the game. I think the best approach going into it is to think it like those oddball b-movie scary movies that used to come out in 80s and 90s, its good for a laugh and turn off your brain but it wont win an academy award for best film lol@@Dripfarted overall i would give it like a B- Flawed but Good it just needs more polish and balance is all.
i went in knowing i probably wasnt going to like it because i never played fnaf and didnt like it but i do see the appeal to someone who does like fnaf which are the target audience for the movie
Critics are never right and they will never matter so idk why tf people keep acting like they do 💀
Nobody fucking cares what critics think
i wasnt a fnaf fan getting into the movie (went with a friend) (i had some background knowledge due to fandom osmosis and having friends over the years really into it so i wasnt totally clueless) and i had mentally rated it a like 6.5-7/10. and then i got into fnaf after and upon rewatch, i gave it a 9/10
The main and biggest problem that I have with the movie is that it's not scary, or even uncanny, not in the slightest, while being an adaptation of prolly the scariest game of the series ..the 1st game. And, with the new interview with Scott in mind, I see why. By trying too hard to make the animatronics seem innocent - it lost its sauce.
I think Paranormal Investigation by Spectre did it best, still scary as shit, but when you think twice about what's going on - the animatronics are not malicious. The movie just had a wrong direction, way too sterile, way too clean.
Willy's Wonderland > FNaF World The Movie. Bet if Willy's was a thrown out FNaF movie script, Nicolas Cage was doing the "Die In a Fire" moment.
Its just because they wanted to do something like fnaf so, without blood and gore and all that
the movie topic is sort of complicated, because while yes it was made with the fans in mind first and foremost, it should've also maybe paced itself better, actually did something with the horror. like fnaf isn't scary on surface level, and they had the chance to put the focus on the MCI and imo the scenes with the kids were some of my favorites. I know mike's story had to be center point but that's the thing!! mike's story in the games was focused on the tragedies of freddy's AND his family (mostly due to william's connection to them)
i feel like they were just a bit too ambitious (since there's alot of cut scenes) or maybe they just weren't sure what approach to take with the IP. hopefully! they do better with the 2nd movie (and possibly 3rd 👀?)
like balance between general audience and fans. also damn i need to turn on notifs for you because we keep missing your vids lol
Hit that bell! Yeah!!!!!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Also whats your opinion on the Springlock scene? I personally liked that it was there, but I don't feel like they went far enough with it
@@UltiNateum ignoring that you just gave spoilers but i got crazy in the movies when that scene happened, you fr could see my chair shaking man 😭
@@Dripfarted “I always come back”
@@UltiNateum me at the movies: YOOO IT'S THE LINEEEEEE (and my friend that i called to watch with me also freaked out lol)
@@UltiNateum So funny story, we got sick. Hence why the reply is so delayed lol.
I get what you mean, I wish it dragged on longer but then again, I wish Afton had more screentime in the movie in general. For what it's worth, it was still very cool. Went absolutely nuts when he said his iconic line too
been a fan since fnaf 1 it was a 5/10 unfortunately
Fair
YOU MEAN TO TELL ME BEING A FNAF FAN DOESNT MAKE IT PERFECT!?!?!??!1111!1!1!1!!1!1!1!@1 LIAR
@@MiguelReis-b9mmakes sense. Can’t wait to see what they do for fnaf2!
I watched the movie as a fnaf fan with friends that werent i kept having to explain lore and they seemed legitimately interested one said "holy shit why is the lore so deep" good thing for a couple of stoners but at the end i said it first this movies great for fans kinda mid for people that dont know anything and they all agreed the part where they have a e.t moment lost everyone even me as a fan (understanding these are children after all obviously they wanna play and have fun) after that part all the suspense was gone
As a longtime massive fan this movie was a 4/10 tops. That shit was laughably bad
I wrote a review on Rt
"Great Video Game Movie
Dog Shit Horror Movie"
Erm erm erm the fnaf movie was flipping epic
🐻
you're a real one 🗿
I loved this movie 8.5 out of 10 for me😂
🐻🐰🐤🦊🐻
Har, Har, Har Har, Har, Har, Har Har, Har Harrrr 🎶
Not all horror has to be like The Nun or Incidues. Idle hand, Tire are comedy horror. That's what the movie was a funny movie with gore
I love this fuckin movie
Same!
It was good
🐻
gigachad
🐻