Calling this a "Pro" or "Max" version of the Juno-DS/XPS-30 would be very misleading as this is arguably a more cut-down and reduced version of that predecessor model. It has both advantages and disadvantages. Anyway, they should have gone with "Juno-DZ" or "Juno-DX" instead, I think. "Juno-DC" works, too - "C" for "Cloud" as this is a more Roland Cloud oriented version. "Juno-D 2005" vs "Juno-D 2024" just do not roll off the tongue as nicely.
@@dvamateur Do you know if the integra-7 allows multis? can you combine multiple programs? or it just allows you to play single programs? I can't find reliable info on this.
@jjptech You can certainly play multiple sounds at once if you set them to the same MIDI channel. But I think the Integra-7 is mainly designed as a multi-timbral sound module for the sounds to be played on separate MIDI channels. In fact, the Integra-7 is a music production powerhouse going as far as making a multichannel surround productions. And maybe the word "production" is the key here, as opposed to playing live on stage. Although, I think the Integra-7 is fantastic for live performances, too. I quite like the SuperNatural sound.
@@ageshero I am not sure it's a hole in the market. Maybe the Zenology Pro serves as a non-keyboard version of Roland sound engine to most people who already own a camputer.
But the same thing happened, Roland stopped at the xp/JV line. I want to see the version 61 keys, and how long the display will continue to work. If the focus is to continue producing plastic keyboards, make a module version.
Some of the differences between Juno D6 and Fantom 0. No touchscreen. Seems far less programmable and layering/split options seem designed for simplicity not for however you'd like. 8 tracks vs 16 and the sequencing options seem cut back (the D6 is more like a scratch pad or groovebox with only 64 steps). No clips. Far fewer controls. Looks less well-built or maybe it's just plainer looking bordering on ugly. No synth models like Juno-106, etc. And I'm sure there's more. Fantom-06 is a proper workstation minus linear recording and audio tracks. Juno-D6 is more like a stage piano with a ton of sounds and some extras. As somebody who's been back-and-forth on getting a Fantom-06 - I actually ended up going with MPC Key 37, which I love, and the new OS will take it even further - I could see myself getting a Juno-D6. If it had built-in speakers (such a great feature for a portable instrument), I would have already ordered it.
Roland making top of the line Jupiter X/Juno X 😅 - NO! we don’t need a screen! Let’s puts the tiny screm ever! 😡 Roland making a low standard - OMG! We need the best screen ever made in this company!!!🤩 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Sometimes Roland doesn't make any sense 😅😅
@@gasparpini well, not enough, maybe I should have said instead Jupiter-80 => JDXA => Jupiter-X => Juno-X 2005 Juno-D => Juno-D LE => Juno-Di => Juno-DS => 2024 Juno-D
Are they Japanese per chance? I lived there for half a year. They can't get enough of that sound. That sterile genetic wave form is a Marmite trip. You either love it or hate it
I believe that Juno ds is better than this as of now you have a multisampler in that four additional assignable knobs.....layer of upto 16 parts and no zencore engine which sounds the same as all the other gears of Roland is producing....nevertheless, this might get multisampling capabilities through an update....
My first Roland was a D5 back in the early 90's, then an MC50 mk2, an Xp 80, Mc 505, and last an XV 88 which I still use. alas yesterday the keys on the Xv started to break 😔I love Roland My Wish is to have the new LX 6 that would be a dream come true. Can you hear me, Roland?
a big improvement to my excellent juno ds88. I haven´t watched the video for less than 10 minutes and I love this. working on sounds and splits is easier with the bigger display than on my 2017 ds88
@@dvamateur of course, the DS is seven years old. I need to try this machine. by the way, I need to upgrade my AX edge to ZEN Core. Thanks for reminding by writing ZEN-Core. I have only seen videos about it and I love it.
@chrisarama Yeah, and the price range range of the JUNO-D is from $899 to $1,299. That's about the same price range as iPhone. Okay, that's fine, the iPhone is a fine product, except that shipping costs are nearly nothing per unit, and also, Roland isn't making the JUNO-D in millions of units. I wonder how Roland can make any money on their synthesizers.
I dont understand why Roland uses the same name as an old model and removed the shortcut for "performance" for this "super layer" no one ever uses. I hope it has a shortcut fpr editing scenes otherwise it's just a bad decision for the panel. Apart from the bigger screen and zencore sounds, I don't see it as an upgrade from my Juno DS76, which has the same controls and better keybed. Also, it can layer 16 sounds, which wasn't even mentioned in this video
Its mostly prefered by live performer bcoz it has 16 onboard "one touch '-bank facility to explore like xp60.. What will b cost & when it will launch in india ,mumbai..
It is interesting how synths and workstations have diverged and converged at the same time. I used to gig live with an 01/W. I had to pre-program pads and patches I needed. Even pre program how I could fade in and out stuff and with which controller input. What I am seeing here is far more focused on live performance.
il a l'air sympathique, ce nouveau JUNO-D , revisité, une tres grosse banque de sons et des possibilités multiples, mais j'ai une suggestion : ll faudrait rajouter systématiquement sur tous les prochaines modèles Roland EN STANDARD un gros joystick multidirectionnel bien robuste comme celui du Roland JX-8P, + un ruban d'expression assignable en dessous + les 2 roues PITCH et MOD, donc LES 3 pour avoir tous les périphériques d'expression possibles à portée de main, le tout en version standard que ce soit du 61, 76 ou 88 notes, et là, c''est gagné. Il ne faut rien négliger pour offrir aux musiciens le maximum de possibilités de jeu.
What are you doing with naming? This is exactly the same name as the Juno-D from 2005. That's super confusing. Not saying it isn't a great keyboard... Is the next Fantom going to be called the Fantom X again? (Love my Fantom X and my recent Jupiter Xm by the way)
The first thing that interests you in version 88 is the quality of the keys. For example, the Yamaha MODX8+ Velocity-sensitive GHS keyboard with hammer action. What's going on here?
@@albertera oh, that? The Juno-D8 has graded action, as do any other 88-key Rolands. I'm remembering now, keybed quality on the original MODX line is quite terrible for the price. Pretty weird for Yamaha, honestly. I do not remember if MODX+ line got improved key quality, I think they didn't. Juno-D8 and Juno-DS88 are easily upgrades in comparison, but MODX and MODX+ have much better sound engines, which is mainly why they are so popular.
I hate to comment on a board that I have not had a chance to play However, having owned a Juno DS for several years, this seems like a downgrade. Perhaps if it was made as a full controller to take advantage of their subscription, I might feel differently. It does not appear that is the case?🤔
The older Juno can only load Axial expansions, this one can load whatever compatible Zenology expansions (most of them). It's really for the Cloud users. Less user memory for custom sounds, too, versus Juno-DS.
I have created my own sounds and loaded them onto the DS with the computer software for it. They could make it simpler to make multi samples. However, not much profit for them to do so I suppose.🤔
Im really hoping for a jupiter x update after seeing some of this stuff! Really wondering if i need this as someone who owns the xm as well as mv-1. Random patch on all your gear please
I'd like a JUPITER-XL with 76-key keybed and JUPITER-XXL with 88 weighted keys. That would be amazing to behold. The price would probably be high though. Expensive metal chassis and enclosure plus a top quality keybed.
For the billionth time: What is the polyphony of these things?! I friend of mine has the Fantom 6 he use it as a workstation and it runs out of polyphony very quickly.
Seems far less programmable and layering/split options seem designed for simplicity not for however you'd like. 8 tracks vs 16 and the sequencing options seem cut back (the D6 is more like a scratch pad or groovebox with only 64 steps). No clips. Far fewer controls. Looks less well-built or maybe it's just plainer looking. No synth models like Juno-106, etc. And I'm sure there's more. Fantom-06 is a proper workstation minus linear recording and audio tracks. Juno-D6 is more like a stage piano with a ton of sounds and some extras. As somebody who's been back-and-forth on getting a Fantom-06 - I actually ended up going with MPC Key 37, which I love, and the new OS will take it even further - I could see myself getting a Juno-D6. If it had built-in speakers (such a great feature for a portable instrument), I would have already ordered it.
It's just a bit of pitch shifting to get any male vice to sound female... somewhat. Us males also generate more lower harmonics, there is no masking that with Roland gear of any kind, and that gives away that the voice is not from a woman.
NO D-BEAM? 🤣And I thought we already had a Juno d before even getting a juno Di in the market? So How can you call that a Juno in 2024? And add a D?😂😂😂 So we are just going to pay for a bigger screen? right?😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 Roland INC, please stop joking in the synth compartment🤣🤣🤣
9:29 FINALLY!!! they stop that Propietary driver stupidity!!! Beautiful machine, but one thing I still find appalling, is this ridiculous mania of roland to make the keyboards unnecessarily bigger with that HUGE chunk of plastic to the left side just to accommodate a small Pitch/Mod joystick.
Older keyboards have a "generic" mode in System settings. They tend to come in "vendor" mode by default, requiring the proprietary driver. Easy thing to change for any user.
Teclas? Tienen decadas ganandole a Korg y Yamaha en ese aspecto. Korg es pésimo, Yamaha a veces le pone buenas teclas a los teclados sintetizadores (y a veces no, como con los MODX). Pero siempre son de los tipos donde cada octavo es una sola pieza, así es que cuando presionas cualquier tecla, estás en realidad doblando plastico. Teclas Roland típicamente jamás son de ese tipo (si son grandes/normales), en vez tienen pivotes y resortes y jamás estás doblando plástico. Las excepciones son los sintetizadores miniatura, como JD-Xi.
@@milenavasic7316 but it's not supposed to have a Grand Piano in it. It's the same to expect a Grand Piano to sound like a piano and to have pads in it. It simply doesn't work like that
Before you buy this first find out the truth about polyphony on this. The Fantom range was advertised as 256 but in real terms that is no where near the amount. Filter slopes, partials(oscillators), sustain pedal, etc fast run out and drop voices even from the piano sound. Roland are very deceitful with their marketing in these new boards. Beware folks, beware.
lol they´ve put vinyl crackle in wile demonstrating the electric piano lol roland roland you guys really got some tricks up your sleeve to lure me into buying :-D
Keyboard sounds great. My only concern is regarding the keys in the D6 and D7 models. I used to have a XP-80 moons ago with the red epoxy glue problem. I wonder if this issue has been solved.
I have no doubt about the quality and good quantity of sounds that this keyboard includes and the colour screen is good.. but I think Roland fails in these cheaper range keyboards in that there is a lot of space available that could be filled with buttons to control layers, frequencies and other ways to control the sound in real time. ...just 4 knobs and 4 sliders....poor! I don't find it attractive in terms of design and it has a very plastic appearance. In the end it is always the same, one who cannot afford to buy a higher-end keyboard gets demotivated by details like these The same reasons why I have never been completely convinced by Juno family.
They strike a balance between having useful cotrols and the simplicity required by fools whose brains fry if they see too many controls. I wish the fools would stick to guitar instead or something.
Ligeramente mejor sonido y con menos partes (8 en vez de 16), y tan poca polifonía que no lo quieren mencionar en la literatura o sitio oficial. También tiene la mitad de memoria para tonos que diseñes y quieras guardar. Tampoco puede utilizar pilas AA recargables. Lo único que me gusta es la conección combo XLR/TRS para micrófonos. Que heredó el reverb SRV2000 igual quel MC-707 y los Fantom está genial, pero eso solo sirve para disfrutar a través de audífonos, no es algo que sirve en vivo. El mayor punto parece ser integración con Roland Cloud. El Juno para los novatitos de hoy en día.
Good gracious these sounds they choose to demo are NOT selling me! Horrid..... uggg.... AND that sequencer is still stuck on stinking patterns like the Fantom? I mean COME ONE Roland.... I've been able to rely on Roland keyboards to sequence a full length arrangement alongside patterns ever since the XP series! Sad you took away the linear sequencer!
🤦♀️ The entry-level 'boards never had linear sequencers, that has been a feature of the past midrange and flagship workstations. There's the Korg Kross2 if you want a linear sequencer in an entry-level 'board. Or grab a used FA-06, only recently discontinued and quite badass, even in the sequencer and arpeggiator departments. Mind you, rock and pop songs can be done as chained loops (which they basically tend to be anyway), which Juno-DS, MC-707, and the Fantoms can do just fine.
Just let this guy make all the product's overviews, always enjoy his performance 💥🤟🙌
Super Demonstration, super Player, super Instrument!
Let's see how long the displays work ..
Now people will confuse with old Juno D and this new One..
If we see it's design , It's Name should be "XPS 30 Pro / Max "or "JUNO DS Pro/Max"
Juno D 2024, problem solved.
@@matiaserp ☺️☺️ yes..
Calling this a "Pro" or "Max" version of the Juno-DS/XPS-30 would be very misleading as this is arguably a more cut-down and reduced version of that predecessor model. It has both advantages and disadvantages.
Anyway, they should have gone with "Juno-DZ" or "Juno-DX" instead, I think. "Juno-DC" works, too - "C" for "Cloud" as this is a more Roland Cloud oriented version.
"Juno-D 2005" vs "Juno-D 2024" just do not roll off the tongue as nicely.
@@Jason75913 You are right 💐👍👍
The SH-4D would be nice if it was updated
LETS SEE WHAT WILL WE GET IN INDIAN VERSION NAME ... I GUESS ROLAND XPS60
Right 👍
Wow wow woooooo weeeee.
I hope i buy one , some day😢❤❤
I'd love a module version of this.
Roland only has the INTEGRA-7 at the moment.
@@dvamateur Do you know if the integra-7 allows multis? can you combine multiple programs? or it just allows you to play single programs? I can't find reliable info on this.
This is the ultimate whole In the market. No modern rompers in rack units, or desktop units
@jjptech You can certainly play multiple sounds at once if you set them to the same MIDI channel. But I think the Integra-7 is mainly designed as a multi-timbral sound module for the sounds to be played on separate MIDI channels. In fact, the Integra-7 is a music production powerhouse going as far as making a multichannel surround productions. And maybe the word "production" is the key here, as opposed to playing live on stage. Although, I think the Integra-7 is fantastic for live performances, too. I quite like the SuperNatural sound.
@@ageshero I am not sure it's a hole in the market. Maybe the Zenology Pro serves as a non-keyboard version of Roland sound engine to most people who already own a camputer.
And that's in line in price with the iPhone 16. Has anyone even thought about that? Roland is amazing!
Roland, Korg, Yamaha, Ketron. They all make some superb instruments.
But the same thing happened, Roland stopped at the xp/JV line. I want to see the version 61 keys, and how long the display will continue to work. If the focus is to continue producing plastic keyboards, make a module version.
Some of the differences between Juno D6 and Fantom 0. No touchscreen. Seems far less programmable and layering/split options seem designed for simplicity not for however you'd like. 8 tracks vs 16 and the sequencing options seem cut back (the D6 is more like a scratch pad or groovebox with only 64 steps). No clips. Far fewer controls. Looks less well-built or maybe it's just plainer looking bordering on ugly. No synth models like Juno-106, etc. And I'm sure there's more. Fantom-06 is a proper workstation minus linear recording and audio tracks. Juno-D6 is more like a stage piano with a ton of sounds and some extras. As somebody who's been back-and-forth on getting a Fantom-06 - I actually ended up going with MPC Key 37, which I love, and the new OS will take it even further - I could see myself getting a Juno-D6. If it had built-in speakers (such a great feature for a portable instrument), I would have already ordered it.
Roland making top of the line Jupiter X/Juno X 😅
- NO! we don’t need a screen! Let’s puts the tiny screm ever! 😡
Roland making a low standard
- OMG! We need the best screen ever made in this company!!!🤩
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sometimes Roland doesn't make any sense 😅😅
Lol! I like Roland, but I also wish I had a larger screen on my Juno X.
Juno-X has nothing at all to do with the Juno-D line.
@@Jason75913 ??🤣🤣🤣
@@gasparpini well, not enough, maybe I should have said instead
Jupiter-80 => JDXA => Jupiter-X => Juno-X
2005 Juno-D => Juno-D LE => Juno-Di => Juno-DS => 2024 Juno-D
10:04
All my fellas would love this piano sound
Are they Japanese per chance? I lived there for half a year. They can't get enough of that sound. That sterile genetic wave form is a Marmite trip. You either love it or hate it
ROLAND I LOVE YOU SO MUCH I WAS GONNA BUY A JUNO DS BUT OMG TY MY SYNTH OVERLORDS (sorry for all caps any Juno synth is amazing to me)
I believe that Juno ds is better than this as of now you have a multisampler in that four additional assignable knobs.....layer of upto 16 parts and no zencore engine which sounds the same as all the other gears of Roland is producing....nevertheless, this might get multisampling capabilities through an update....
I strongly recommend the Juno-DS over this if you are not deep in the Roland Cloud ecosystem.
My first Roland was a D5 back in the early 90's, then an MC50 mk2, an Xp 80, Mc 505, and last an XV 88 which I still use. alas yesterday the keys on the Xv started to break 😔I love Roland My Wish is to have the new LX 6 that would be a dream come true. Can you hear me, Roland?
a big improvement to my excellent juno ds88. I haven´t watched the video for less than 10 minutes and I love this. working on sounds and splits is easier with the bigger display than on my 2017 ds88
The DS88 is also excellent. But I think the JUNO-D with ZEN-Core synthesis is even better.
@@dvamateur of course, the DS is seven years old. I need to try this machine. by the way, I need to upgrade my AX edge to ZEN Core. Thanks for reminding by writing ZEN-Core. I have only seen videos about it and I love it.
@chrisarama Yeah, and the price range range of the JUNO-D is from $899 to $1,299. That's about the same price range as iPhone. Okay, that's fine, the iPhone is a fine product, except that shipping costs are nearly nothing per unit, and also, Roland isn't making the JUNO-D in millions of units. I wonder how Roland can make any money on their synthesizers.
I dont understand why Roland uses the same name as an old model and removed the shortcut for "performance" for this "super layer" no one ever uses. I hope it has a shortcut fpr editing scenes otherwise it's just a bad decision for the panel.
Apart from the bigger screen and zencore sounds, I don't see it as an upgrade from my Juno DS76, which has the same controls and better keybed. Also, it can layer 16 sounds, which wasn't even mentioned in this video
Well, I don't have a JUNO-DS, so, for me the ZEN-Core based JUNO-D looks immensely attractive.
@@dvamateur it is indeed
Dude we need a new arranger workstation roland
Its mostly prefered by live performer bcoz it has 16 onboard "one touch '-bank facility to explore like xp60..
What will b cost & when it will launch in india ,mumbai..
It is interesting how synths and workstations have diverged and converged at the same time. I used to gig live with an 01/W. I had to pre-program pads and patches I needed. Even pre program how I could fade in and out stuff and with which controller input. What I am seeing here is far more focused on live performance.
This guy sounds like Christopher Walken with a dash of brit mixed in.
good sounds!
I want one!!!
il a l'air sympathique, ce nouveau JUNO-D , revisité, une tres grosse banque de sons et des possibilités multiples, mais j'ai une suggestion :
ll faudrait rajouter systématiquement sur tous les prochaines modèles Roland EN STANDARD un gros joystick multidirectionnel bien robuste comme celui du Roland JX-8P, + un ruban d'expression assignable en dessous + les 2 roues PITCH et MOD, donc LES 3 pour avoir tous les périphériques d'expression possibles à portée de main, le tout en version standard que ce soit du 61, 76 ou 88 notes, et là, c''est gagné.
Il ne faut rien négliger pour offrir aux musiciens le maximum de possibilités de jeu.
待っていました。
Can You Make Some More Card's That Includes Many More Different Sounds For THE CLASSIC Roland D-10 D-20 And D-50 SYNTHESIZER'S Please. 🙏.
What are you doing with naming? This is exactly the same name as the Juno-D from 2005. That's super confusing. Not saying it isn't a great keyboard... Is the next Fantom going to be called the Fantom X again? (Love my Fantom X and my recent Jupiter Xm by the way)
EDIT: OK, it looks like they're actually called JUNO-D6, JUNO-D7, JUNO-D8.
@@darwiniandude But it is still the "Juno-D" line, which is confusing, nevertheless. You were right.
Roland, don't forget the V-Synth 😢
The first thing that interests you in version 88 is the quality of the keys. For example, the Yamaha MODX8+ Velocity-sensitive GHS keyboard with hammer action. What's going on here?
-This is a lower-end/entry-level keyboard, what do you think? MODX8 (any version) is a midrange keyboard.a-
@@Jason75913 everything is correct, the Yamaha MODX8+ GHS keyboard comes with gradation (the higher the easier) but Roland doesn’t say anything.
@@albertera oh, that? The Juno-D8 has graded action, as do any other 88-key Rolands. I'm remembering now, keybed quality on the original MODX line is quite terrible for the price. Pretty weird for Yamaha, honestly.
I do not remember if MODX+ line got improved key quality, I think they didn't. Juno-D8 and Juno-DS88 are easily upgrades in comparison, but MODX and MODX+ have much better sound engines, which is mainly why they are so popular.
I hate to comment on a board that I have not had a chance to play
However, having owned a Juno DS for several years, this seems like a downgrade. Perhaps if it was made as a full controller to take advantage of their subscription, I might feel differently. It does not appear that is the case?🤔
The older Juno can only load Axial expansions, this one can load whatever compatible Zenology expansions (most of them). It's really for the Cloud users. Less user memory for custom sounds, too, versus Juno-DS.
I have created my own sounds and loaded them onto the DS with the computer software for it. They could make it simpler to make multi samples. However, not much profit for them to do so I suppose.🤔
Im really hoping for a jupiter x update after seeing some of this stuff! Really wondering if i need this as someone who owns the xm as well as mv-1. Random patch on all your gear please
I'd like a JUPITER-XL with 76-key keybed and JUPITER-XXL with 88 weighted keys. That would be amazing to behold. The price would probably be high though. Expensive metal chassis and enclosure plus a top quality keybed.
So can the user choose sounds and layer them?
yes
@@annother3350 How many layers?
@@ChrisP3000x 7 plus a drum layer i believe
@@annother3350 Ok thanks!
Don’t tell me-let me guess. The original model has returned?
… Sounds really like a Juno. Good work.
How big is expansion memory in this new JUNO D ?
How to avilable Indian market sir pls reply
For the billionth time: What is the polyphony of these things?!
I friend of mine has the Fantom 6 he use it as a workstation and it runs out of polyphony very quickly.
128
@@20680 Source?
@@20680 DOUBT
I’m trying to figure what difference are beetwen this keyboard and Fantom O series🙄
Seems far less programmable and layering/split options seem designed for simplicity not for however you'd like. 8 tracks vs 16 and the sequencing options seem cut back (the D6 is more like a scratch pad or groovebox with only 64 steps). No clips. Far fewer controls. Looks less well-built or maybe it's just plainer looking. No synth models like Juno-106, etc. And I'm sure there's more. Fantom-06 is a proper workstation minus linear recording and audio tracks. Juno-D6 is more like a stage piano with a ton of sounds and some extras. As somebody who's been back-and-forth on getting a Fantom-06 - I actually ended up going with MPC Key 37, which I love, and the new OS will take it even further - I could see myself getting a Juno-D6. If it had built-in speakers (such a great feature for a portable instrument), I would have already ordered it.
Fantom-0 is better in every way possible, and rightfully pricier.
what is the boot time?
Shouldn't be as much as Korg workstations, at least.
Fantom 0 series looks a better option
🧙🏻♂ 8 Tracks @ maximum 64 steps doth not a workstation make.
No major change only big display highlights 😂😂
Wut whaat 😂
8:55 what a hell.... this do a female voice too??? WTF!!!
It's just a bit of pitch shifting to get any male vice to sound female... somewhat. Us males also generate more lower harmonics, there is no masking that with Roland gear of any kind, and that gives away that the voice is not from a woman.
D6 and D7 variants have no aftertouch. It's 2024 Roland: your egregious product segmentation penny pinching is more obvious than ever.
Korg, Roland, and Yamaha want you buying the 88-key flagship workstation if you want aftertouch, as always.
Looks cool but how about some more Boutiques? I'd love a JP-8000 in Boutique form and a Jupiter 4 Boutique. Been a while since one has dropped.
Zen-Core has a neat VA half and beautifully emulates JP8k's supersaws, minus the nasty aliasing.
@@Jason75913 a Boutique JP8000 probably would be Zencore based.
I'd buy this instantly if it had built-in speakers ...
There are arranger keyboards and FP30X for that.
NO D-BEAM? 🤣And I thought we already had a Juno d before even getting a juno Di in the market? So How can you call that a Juno in 2024? And add a D?😂😂😂 So we are just going to pay for a bigger screen? right?😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 Roland INC, please stop joking in the synth compartment🤣🤣🤣
🧙🏻♂ You'd look weird using D-Beam--someone will take snaps & say you are doing Illuminati handsigns.
9:29 FINALLY!!! they stop that Propietary driver stupidity!!!
Beautiful machine, but one thing I still find appalling, is this ridiculous mania of roland to make the keyboards unnecessarily bigger with that HUGE chunk of plastic to the left side just to accommodate a small Pitch/Mod joystick.
Older keyboards have a "generic" mode in System settings. They tend to come in "vendor" mode by default, requiring the proprietary driver. Easy thing to change for any user.
So the same as the Juno ds just with shitty zen core sound expansion slot.
Not worth a upgrade
Lo mismo de siempre nada diferente inviertan mejor en la calidad de las teclas
Teclas? Tienen decadas ganandole a Korg y Yamaha en ese aspecto. Korg es pésimo, Yamaha a veces le pone buenas teclas a los teclados sintetizadores (y a veces no, como con los MODX). Pero siempre son de los tipos donde cada octavo es una sola pieza, así es que cuando presionas cualquier tecla, estás en realidad doblando plastico. Teclas Roland típicamente jamás son de ese tipo (si son grandes/normales), en vez tienen pivotes y resortes y jamás estás doblando plástico. Las excepciones son los sintetizadores miniatura, como JD-Xi.
Same as ds. No reason to upgrade unless you want crappy zen core digital sounds that add latency when you play.
and less parts for layering and externally sequencing, and less user preset slots, and no ability to run off rechargeable AAs, and bulkier
IN THEIR PAST LIFE THESE YOUNG WOMEN WERE PARROTS
Excellent observation
That's not a synth... But a workstation!
Oh, well...!
Subtractive synth workstation.
The Best sound of JUNO-60 is General MIDI Grand Piano.
Juno-60 has no GM Grand Piano.
@@pcuimac JUNO 60 is the Worst Synth because it has no GRAND PIANO!
@@milenavasic7316 but it's not supposed to have a Grand Piano in it. It's the same to expect a Grand Piano to sound like a piano and to have pads in it. It simply doesn't work like that
Before you buy this first find out the truth about polyphony on this. The Fantom range was advertised as 256 but in real terms that is no where near the amount. Filter slopes, partials(oscillators), sustain pedal, etc fast run out and drop voices even from the piano sound. Roland are very deceitful with their marketing in these new boards. Beware folks, beware.
これ単体でソングが組めれば言う事なしなのですが（シーンのチェイン・プレイ）....
異なる演奏パターンを組み合わせて曲を作るには別途PC/MacとDAWが必要です。
アプデで追加されそうですけどね。
Missing the d-beam!
Literally just bought the DS88 a week ago 💀
And stick to it, unless you want Roland Cloud integration. I don't recommend this over the Juno-DS otherwise.
🤠 Nothing wrong with it. If you want better sounds, hook it up to a PC & run VSTis.
No D-Beam like the 2005 Juno-D? 🤣
I like the connectivity.
I’ve tried but I’m not sold on the standard Zen Core engine at all - my Korg Triton sounds better in my opinion..
lol they´ve put vinyl crackle in wile demonstrating the electric piano lol roland roland you guys really got some tricks up your sleeve to lure me into buying :-D
I haven't been this excited about a Roland since the launch of the D20🎉
this might be my replacement for my old beat up Juno-Di
Keyboard sounds great. My only concern is regarding the keys in the D6 and D7 models. I used to have a XP-80 moons ago with the red epoxy glue problem. I wonder if this issue has been solved.
Instant hit machine 😊
mc707とほぼ同じ機能と価格か...
Interesting Review
I have no doubt about the quality and good quantity of sounds that this keyboard includes and the colour screen is good.. but I think Roland fails in these cheaper range keyboards in that there is a lot of space available that could be filled with buttons to control layers, frequencies and other ways to control the sound in real time. ...just 4 knobs and 4 sliders....poor!
I don't find it attractive in terms of design and it has a very plastic appearance.
In the end it is always the same, one who cannot afford to buy a higher-end keyboard gets demotivated by details like these
The same reasons why I have never been completely convinced by Juno family.
They strike a balance between having useful cotrols and the simplicity required by fools whose brains fry if they see too many controls. I wish the fools would stick to guitar instead or something.
Mejor sonido que juno ds. Precio de 61 teclas dolares estados unidos
Ligeramente mejor sonido y con menos partes (8 en vez de 16), y tan poca polifonía que no lo quieren mencionar en la literatura o sitio oficial. También tiene la mitad de memoria para tonos que diseñes y quieras guardar.
Tampoco puede utilizar pilas AA recargables. Lo único que me gusta es la conección combo XLR/TRS para micrófonos. Que heredó el reverb SRV2000 igual quel MC-707 y los Fantom está genial, pero eso solo sirve para disfrutar a través de audífonos, no es algo que sirve en vivo.
El mayor punto parece ser integración con Roland Cloud. El Juno para los novatitos de hoy en día.
Good gracious these sounds they choose to demo are NOT selling me! Horrid..... uggg.... AND that sequencer is still stuck on stinking patterns like the Fantom? I mean COME ONE Roland.... I've been able to rely on Roland keyboards to sequence a full length arrangement alongside patterns ever since the XP series! Sad you took away the linear sequencer!
🤦♀️
The entry-level 'boards never had linear sequencers, that has been a feature of the past midrange and flagship workstations.
There's the Korg Kross2 if you want a linear sequencer in an entry-level 'board.
Or grab a used FA-06, only recently discontinued and quite badass, even in the sequencer and arpeggiator departments.
Mind you, rock and pop songs can be done as chained loops (which they basically tend to be anyway), which Juno-DS, MC-707, and the Fantoms can do just fine.
Pha-50 would be a way better to D8
НЕТ ! ЭТО ПЛОХО ! ЭТО ИГРУШКА... НО НЕ СЕРЬЕЗНЫЙ СИНТ...
Only 4 u