After studying mastering the elliott wave many concepts been cleared. i was orthodox elliotician and now i realised why we should not keep multiple hypothesis where you can guarantee single and legit count. yes you have scientific approach. Thank you Sir
ANSWER PLEASE You've broken several rules of your own book one of them being : BD baseline in triangle must not be broken by E wave before it ends Yet you broke this essential rule in this analysis Another paradox is your prediction of Dow index in your book to this prediction you've made here, you could go with WXY, yet you chose to go with triangle Why? Can anybody explain please
Btw, to test your hypothesis, do analysis on the wave structure since 1897 of DJI/XAUUSD. Looks like a triangle? Price stonks in real money, not monopoly money.
Your efforts made me more motivated to work in the financial markets, so I thank you very much and I hope you are always healthy. Alireza/Neo Shooshtari From Iran/Persia
glen the falls are always faster than rises as they come sensing some catatstrophic event ...or rather selling is usually done by first distribution then dumping the asset ...so are you saying all stocks and index are in a down move as that is the direction where price travels fastest on the other hand all asset classes are making new highs decade after decade
13:37 I have never read of any rule in EW theory which requires that wave C of an expanded flat must be shorter in time duration than wave A. It is only required that wave C have a 5 wave structure. Also never read that retracement of wave C must be faster than wave C. I guess I need to read your book. I would like to read some substantiation for your theory that a neutral triangle can contain a structure that otherwise looks like an EW expanded flat? Perhaps your neutral triangle should only apply to running or regular flats. Even your plotted channel in this video tries to cheat and pretend it is not an expanded flat and you plot this on a non-logarithmically scaled chart (against your own thesis in 1988 that markets are logarithmic) in an attempt to make this rally since 2008 appear to be more relatively flat than it really is! Disingenuous. I understand your methods are trying to explain structures that look corrective in your view instead of impulsive, even though they end at higher prices. This seems to violate the dichotomy of motive versus impulsive in EW theory? I will need to dig into the weeds to wrap my mind around how you formed your the details of your magnum opus. And to form my opinion on it as an abstraction of EW. That said, I could offer a scenario for the huge bull run beyond 2028 or 2032 if the dollar loses its reserve currency status and printed like Argentina did, which is plausible in a new multipolar world emerging post-WWIII Thucydides trap underway. It would be a crash up of sorts. Hyperinflation. Yet the USD is likely to be very strong during the WWIII phased ~2025 to 2028ish. Thus there could be severe correction in the markets, unless somehow USD markets rises with the dollar via financial repression to control leakage into price inflation thus forcing money in speculations instead, if for example they can lock everything inside of CBDCs (central bank digital currency) with centrally managed 666 capital controls, while handing out UBI stimulus checks like madness.
After studying mastering the elliott wave many concepts been cleared. i was orthodox elliotician and now i realised why we should not keep multiple hypothesis where you can guarantee single and legit count. yes you have scientific approach. Thank you Sir
ANSWER PLEASE
You've broken several rules of your own book one of them being :
BD baseline in triangle must not be broken by E wave before it ends
Yet you broke this essential rule in this analysis
Another paradox is your prediction of Dow index in your book to this prediction you've made here, you could go with WXY, yet you chose to go with triangle
Why? Can anybody explain please
Btw, to test your hypothesis, do analysis on the wave structure since 1897 of DJI/XAUUSD. Looks like a triangle? Price stonks in real money, not monopoly money.
Your efforts made me more motivated to work in the financial markets, so I thank you very much and I hope you are always healthy.
Alireza/Neo Shooshtari From Iran/Persia
Reply if you wnt ready wave chart in trading view
Thank you
Thank you.
imran bhai aap idhar ..))
Thanks a lot.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with NEoWave followers
Reply if you want readymade wave chart in tradingview
Thx for the content
glen the falls are always faster than rises as they come sensing some catatstrophic event ...or rather selling is usually done by first distribution then dumping the asset ...so are you saying all stocks and index are in a down move as that is the direction where price travels fastest on the other hand all asset classes are making new highs decade after decade
Reply if you want ready wave chart in trading view
@@siddesh2608 AYE
Thanks a tonne
Reply if you wnt wave chart indicator in trading,view
Thank you sir
From India
13:37 I have never read of any rule in EW theory which requires that wave C of an expanded flat must be shorter in time duration than wave A. It is only required that wave C have a 5 wave structure. Also never read that retracement of wave C must be faster than wave C. I guess I need to read your book.
I would like to read some substantiation for your theory that a neutral triangle can contain a structure that otherwise looks like an EW expanded flat? Perhaps your neutral triangle should only apply to running or regular flats. Even your plotted channel in this video tries to cheat and pretend it is not an expanded flat and you plot this on a non-logarithmically scaled chart (against your own thesis in 1988 that markets are logarithmic) in an attempt to make this rally since 2008 appear to be more relatively flat than it really is! Disingenuous.
I understand your methods are trying to explain structures that look corrective in your view instead of impulsive, even though they end at higher prices. This seems to violate the dichotomy of motive versus impulsive in EW theory? I will need to dig into the weeds to wrap my mind around how you formed your the details of your magnum opus. And to form my opinion on it as an abstraction of EW.
That said, I could offer a scenario for the huge bull run beyond 2028 or 2032 if the dollar loses its reserve currency status and printed like Argentina did, which is plausible in a new multipolar world emerging post-WWIII Thucydides trap underway. It would be a crash up of sorts. Hyperinflation. Yet the USD is likely to be very strong during the WWIII phased ~2025 to 2028ish. Thus there could be severe correction in the markets, unless somehow USD markets rises with the dollar via financial repression to control leakage into price inflation thus forcing money in speculations instead, if for example they can lock everything inside of CBDCs (central bank digital currency) with centrally managed 666 capital controls, while handing out UBI stimulus checks like madness.
Sir, how do we combine this with Smart money concepts.
Or how to use MACD with this 🙏.
Добро пожаловать в мир высоких аналитических технологий
Delhi me ak sardar Neo wave pada rha he Jo kuch nhi janta,,, lekin logo se lakho rupees ठग रहा है।। D.K SINGH नाम है उसका
Elliot wave on steriods
Thanks a lot