Dan Hodges not only looks like Starmlin, he is sounding like him, found with a Al Quaeda terrorist manual and ricin, yet not charged as a terrorist, utter crock, we all know why for the sake of diversity and because the persecuted truth tellers imprisoned by Starmlin would be proven correct, and he couldn't have that could he.
Am I the only one who remembers Starmer saying the Southport protesters would be arrested ,, sent to court and 'FOUND GUILTY' .... So Starmer compromised every single case that then went before the court, so in that case everyone of those people convicted should be released.
Is that exactly what he said? If so, you make an amazing point and Keir should be asked that question publicly. Can you link or tell me where to find where he said that?
@jasoncooper He works for the Mail on Sunday. A completely different newspaper with a completely different editorial format and the fact you don’t know that means you don’t know his Mother was Glenda Jackson, a Labour minister in Browns government. There should be an IQ test before they let thicko’s on this comments section
Apparently, he's "on the side of justice and due process", hmmm, the BBC, sky, itv C4 + 5, his newspaper produced in-depth reports on why TR got arrested, tried and imprisoned within 3 hrs in Leeds, without making a plea or his own representation. A trial that went to appeal where everything was dismissed. None made follow up pieces about how their legal advice 100% agreed with the "narrative", yet 100% of them were wrong. How could this be?!
He’s right to an extent-the issue is in other cases those rules from the CPS don’t seem to apply. So that’s where Mike should have gone with the discussion. There are inconsistencies and Mike didn’t go hard enough on that.
So let me get this straight. Hodges is an ‘independent’ journalist yet he has spent 10 minutes defending Starmer, defending the judiciary and defending the government so he isn’t an ‘independent’ journalist.
While i dont think he has zero empathy for the victims, it is certainly clear that Starmer does his usual thing of blaming failures on“ them”. Meaning everyone else including police, Prevent, social workers, schools, intelligence services etc. - except himself for being complicit in witholding information he knew.
Meanwhile Stamer was actively predjucing the courts against the people by calling them "far-whiute thugs", who were being tried for calling the terrorist, a terrorist.
No it isn't. From CPS website regarding disclosure of information to third parties in a trial where an accused hasn't been actively prosecuted - "Suspects who are prosecuted are entitled to have their guilt or innocence established with all the safeguards of a criminal trial, including the rules of evidence. Those who are not prosecuted, or who are acquitted, are entitled to the presumption of innocence. The presumption of innocence can only be undermined if the CPS or police were to release evidence enabling individuals to trawl through it to determine why the person was suspected in the first place." If the presumption of innocence is undermined by release of evidence before the suspect is successful prosecuted, it would absolutely risk prejudicing the trial.
If i did what he did no amount of talking about the trial would stop em locking me up and throwing away the key, so its utter b.ll.x and we all know it.
There is absolutely zero chance that Starlin had any "group of lawyers" advising him to allow reporting. Lords Ali and Kahn will have been the only advisors with his ear. These people talk as though we haven't seen what we have seen, regarding pandering to islamists/leftists/non whites. Traitors.
@@ecaeas4439 so why was that same standard not given to everyone else... Who Stamer called far-whuite, and the home office declared were all guilty before their trials?
Exactly. There was no doubt that this wasn't the murderer. What can possibly be said that would let this vile thing walk free. Why has it even taken until now?
As soon as this guy says KS wasn't Prime Minister at the time of the riots he lost ALL credibility. "Oh, I thought you meant the OTHER riots" he said!! What the hell is he smoking?
I know? what riots, maybe he's thinking of the Toxteth riots. The looting binges carried out by the ethnic population of London just so they can nick a pair of Nike trainers don't count.
One can only call someoneva criminal etc unless youve been convicted of a crime being apprehended and charged for a suspected criminal offence doesnt mean you are crininal doesn't mean anything nor are you necessary a criminal unless you've been convicted of a crime
"Everybody must take note of this previous comment from below." Starmer must have recognised the surname of the family after representing and relocating the Rwandan father for war crimes and knew instantly he was culpable. THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO RESEARCH THIS AND SEE HOW FAR AND HOW BIG THIS CORRUPTION GOES/IS. BACK.
He is supposedly an ‘independent’ journalist but has spent 10 minutes acting as a Labour Party spokesperson because that is exactly what he is. His Mother was a Labour minister. There is nothing in this interview that says he is anything but a Labour Party stooge
Well said Mike I feel your passion on this just like many others in the public were sick of this two tier system in this country it has to stop and Starmer has to resign.
He called them RACIST. That's how they were treated when they went to jail. At least one person gloated over the reception they would receive from certain gangs in prison. Peter Lynch died.
For shouting his free speech response and holding a placard, after the terrible murder of the three innocent angels, yet another lost his life related to this abhorrent incident.
Keir is not a public prosecutioner anymore and he needs to realise that. If he wants to run the government he should do it properly, he put people in jail for "lying" about the lad in Southport yet it was him who was lying
@susanbishop5228 yeah but he won't be in prison long enough that's the problem and I don't understand why criminals gets treated better than the victims in the uk and he his walking freely in jail them baby's are not.
How can these people genuinely look people in the eye and say phrases like “he could have walked free” 🤯🤯 what a F***ing cop out. As if he was going to walk free because the public found out about his background. What a load of drivel.
My queation to Dan Hodges: Do you only get predjucal court protections if you have the "correct" skin colour/relgion? You seem to think that only the terroist should be given this protection, but all the people who Stamer called far-whyite thugs, for calling the terrorist, a terrorist, shouls not be given the same protection...
He was arrested on 29 July, but was not charged until 29 October. How can it take 3 months to decide what he would be charged with when they found the ricin and al-qaeda document within hours of the attack!
Publishing a tweet calling everyone arrested after the riots as criminals and saying they will face to full force of the law must have also prejudiced their trials. They were actually labelled criminals before they came to court.
Yep, that should have been the question asked to the Liebour mouthpiece. Who exactly at the CPS gave Starmer that advice and given that Starmer is a former Head of that service, I wonder how that conversation went?
I'm always quite surprised when I hear a trained police-person say: "I'm arresting you on suspicion of ...", when they have actually just watched the crime being committed, and also, it has been recorded on multiple cameras! 😮
It doesn't matter what was said before the trial, under the British system, there is zero prospect of a man guilty of such offences walking free. The judge would have dealt with any issues by way of jury directions.
Tell me what this bloke is on if he’s a journalist, he wants to change his job because he’s no good at being a journalist at all he’s got left left left wrote all over him😡
Call me stupid, but how could the case be prejudiced when he was caught in the act of committing it? Surely there was no way he would have got away with it.
The jury are told to consider "only the evidence they hear in the court room". He's not walking anywhere the evidence was a strong as you'll ever get in any case.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
He had people jailed for being far right knowing that he was a terrorist
Rip Peter Lynch 😢
Dan Hodges not only looks like Starmlin, he is sounding like him, found with a Al Quaeda terrorist manual and ricin, yet not charged as a terrorist, utter crock, we all know why for the sake of diversity and because the persecuted truth tellers imprisoned by Starmlin would be proven correct, and he couldn't have that could he.
Tommy Robinson Address, Oxford Union on youtube, a must watch.
Bob he’s not a Muslim he just downloaded there manual his dad’s church has put a statement out he was obsessed with school spree killings
Lol they got arrested for rioted since its a crime
Am I the only one who remembers Starmer saying the Southport protesters would be arrested ,, sent to court and 'FOUND GUILTY' .... So Starmer compromised every single case that then went before the court, so in that case everyone of those people convicted should be released.
Well, yes. That's what he's good at.
And he called everyone “ Far Right “ in the days following the murder of these three innocent children
spot on.
Is that exactly what he said? If so, you make an amazing point and Keir should be asked that question publicly.
Can you link or tell me where to find where he said that?
Absolutely spot on
Hodges isn’t a journalist
He is a Labour Party spokesperson
Absolutely right.
Glenda Jackson's lad. The fruit doesn't fall far from the tree.
Labour Party spokesman 😂😂😂 DELUDED he works for the daily mail you muppet
100%
@jasoncooper
He works for the Mail on Sunday. A completely different newspaper with a completely different editorial format and the fact you don’t know that means you don’t know his Mother was Glenda Jackson, a Labour minister in Browns government.
There should be an IQ test before they let thicko’s on this comments section
Hodges is part of the problem.
A massive one
He works for the daily mail 😂😂 muppet
Apparently, he's "on the side of justice and due process", hmmm, the BBC, sky, itv C4 + 5, his newspaper produced in-depth reports on why TR got arrested, tried and imprisoned within 3 hrs in Leeds, without making a plea or his own representation.
A trial that went to appeal where everything was dismissed.
None made follow up pieces about how their legal advice 100% agreed with the "narrative", yet 100% of them were wrong. How could this be?!
@@ivannio8519 bit like you then
He’s right to an extent-the issue is in other cases those rules from the CPS don’t seem to apply. So that’s where Mike should have gone with the discussion. There are inconsistencies and Mike didn’t go hard enough on that.
The madness of the Far Left
Ideology first , sod the human cost , That’s Marxism for you
@ Yep. About 20 million Russians and 50 million Chinese.
@@garyfletcher1910lol. Look how many people agree with u b#@ch... ur almost as popular as Starmer-bot.... 🤖
@@garyfletcher1910🤣🤡
@@tillyt4054😂😂😂 you think Starmer is a Marxist!
So let me get this straight. Hodges is an ‘independent’ journalist yet he has spent 10 minutes defending Starmer, defending the judiciary and defending the government so he isn’t an ‘independent’ journalist.
Exactly
Stalins stooge
He, he, he! You have the mark of the man. More repeater than reporter.
He is an absolute SAUSAGE
He doesn't like free speech
HOW MUCH IS DAN HODGES BEING PAID TO "STICK TO THE PARTY LINE." Take his reporters card away from him. Well done Mike for "sticking it to him."
Well said Mike
He attempts to twist and spin the narrative.
Why ! Oh why would anyone want to do that.?
A guilty conscience maybe
Good on ya Mr Graham you give it to this useless Labour government.
Lord Carliles wife Alison Levitt has just received a life peerage off Starmer… might explain the change in his stance.
Jesus, is he married???
It gets worse by the day with this government
Hah! That explains it!!
@@mattg56 women will marry anything if there's money lol even the older generation nothing more then street walkers being honest
You scratch my back I'll scratch yours. That beast was caught murdering those 3 little girls how could he have walked
Bloody hell. Who IS this so-called journalist? He's no more than an apologist for Starmer.
He's infuriating
2TK: An utterly disingenuous, pathological liar with absolutely zero empathy for the victims.
Bring back capital punishment
While i dont think he has zero empathy for the victims, it is certainly clear that Starmer does his usual thing of blaming failures on“ them”. Meaning everyone else including police, Prevent, social workers, schools, intelligence services etc. - except himself for being complicit in witholding information he knew.
You should never trust a bloke who is trying to make himself look like Starmer 🤔🤔
Gross innit
Disgrace the public are being lied to again.
Hodges is Two Tier Kiers mouthpiece.
Well done Mike Graham.
He wants to be ⭐ mer his twin!
he even looks and sounds like him
Both repulsive
Dan Hodges is a Labour party insider. At the end of the day he will always defend Labour and whatever it does.
Predjudice the trial of someone caught red handed is utter bullsnot.
Meanwhile Stamer was actively predjucing the courts against the people by calling them "far-whiute thugs", who were being tried for calling the terrorist, a terrorist.
No it isn't. From CPS website regarding disclosure of information to third parties in a trial where an accused hasn't been actively prosecuted -
"Suspects who are prosecuted are entitled to have their guilt or innocence established with all the safeguards of a criminal trial, including the rules of evidence. Those who are not prosecuted, or who are acquitted, are entitled to the presumption of innocence. The presumption of innocence can only be undermined if the CPS or police were to release evidence enabling individuals to trawl through it to determine why the person was suspected in the first place."
If the presumption of innocence is undermined by release of evidence before the suspect is successful prosecuted, it would absolutely risk prejudicing the trial.
If i did what he did no amount of talking about the trial would stop em locking me up and throwing away the key, so its utter b.ll.x and we all know it.
There is absolutely zero chance that Starlin had any "group of lawyers" advising him to allow reporting. Lords Ali and Kahn will have been the only advisors with his ear.
These people talk as though we haven't seen what we have seen, regarding pandering to islamists/leftists/non whites.
Traitors.
@@ecaeas4439 so why was that same standard not given to everyone else... Who Stamer called far-whuite, and the home office declared were all guilty before their trials?
There are lies and damn lies. This is evil and kier must go.
How the hell was there a chance he could have walked free... he murdered three innocent children.
Exactly. There was no doubt that this wasn't the murderer. What can possibly be said that would let this vile thing walk free. Why has it even taken until now?
There isn't. You're being played.
And given the attempted murder of the others in the same building, plenty of witnesses.
It's a threat.
"We'll free him if you keep talking about it"
Because he must be given a fair trial without prejudice. People like you and Mike Graham could put that in jeopardy
Why a is this journalist defending him. This was a cover up. These journalist should do their job and investigate full stop
must be a chum of lying two tier keir
He attempts to twist and spin the narrative.
Why ! Oh why would anyone want to do that.?
A guilty conscience maybe
As soon as this guy says KS wasn't Prime Minister at the time of the riots he lost ALL credibility. "Oh, I thought you meant the OTHER riots" he said!! What the hell is he smoking?
I know? what riots, maybe he's thinking of the Toxteth riots. The looting binges carried out by the ethnic population of London just so they can nick a pair of Nike trainers don't count.
Classic revisionism. They think we're absolutely stupid
C#@k.... that's what he's smoking
At that point his own ego and arrogance overtook his ability to try and defend the indefensible. Classic Liebour!!!!!!
Thanks Mike 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 common sense prevails.
Never heard of Dan Hodges, but what a tool this person is.
Typical Woke/Leftie.
Disgusting person
This is why we must all celebrate the intelligence, sanity and honesty of Mike Graham 🎉 A true journalist. A rare gem whom we should all cherish.
Hi Mike
Just imagine the terror them poor girls went through and the survivors still going through 😡😡😡😡 not terrorist my arse
Starmer also said that rioters were travelling from all over the country to descend on Southport! That was a lie!
Everything they say is a lie
And he called them all criminals before they were even charged!
One can only call someoneva criminal etc unless youve been convicted of a crime being apprehended and charged for a suspected criminal offence doesnt mean you are crininal doesn't mean anything nor are you necessary a criminal unless you've been convicted of a crime
"Everybody must take note of this previous comment from below." Starmer must have recognised the surname of the family after representing and relocating the Rwandan father for war crimes and knew instantly he was culpable. THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO RESEARCH THIS AND SEE HOW FAR AND HOW BIG THIS CORRUPTION GOES/IS. BACK.
Hear!
yes
Absolutely
You’re on fire Mike! 🎯
Dan Hodges really has drunk the Koolaid.
He is supposedly an ‘independent’ journalist but has spent 10 minutes acting as a Labour Party spokesperson because that is exactly what he is. His Mother was a Labour minister.
There is nothing in this interview that says he is anything but a Labour Party stooge
Glass Eye😳🏴🏴🏴
Well said Mike I feel your passion on this just like many others in the public were sick of this two tier system in this country it has to stop and Starmer has to resign.
Is it Ofcom who make Talk give so much airtime to Labour apologists? Mike Graham should get the Presenter of the Year award.
They caught the man who committed these dreadful acts. He was as guilty as sin. Why should we worry about his trial?
Quote "But you have to listen to the words of Kier Starmer" - why should I listen to the words of a confirmed and compulsive liar?
He called them RACIST.
That's how they were treated when they went to jail. At least one person gloated over the reception they would receive from certain gangs in prison.
Peter Lynch died.
For shouting his free speech response and holding a placard, after the terrible murder of the three innocent angels, yet another lost his life related to this abhorrent incident.
Get lawyers out of the parliament!
Keir is not a public prosecutioner anymore and he needs to realise that. If he wants to run the government he should do it properly, he put people in jail for "lying" about the lad in Southport yet it was him who was lying
How can you prejudice the trial when he was vaught in the act?
How can he walk freely when clearly he killed the three children....
He is in custody
@susanbishop5228 yeah but he won't be in prison long enough that's the problem and I don't understand why criminals gets treated better than the victims in the uk and he his walking freely in jail them baby's are not.
@carolyoung5529 sentence is tomorrow.
I await the judges comments etc.
@susanbishop5228 You'll never hear it, unless the judge says "I hope he gets the help he needs"
If that thing ever gets out of prison he wont last 10 mins on the street. And we know other people in prison will get to him.
Another of Starmers bum boys running cover to hide his involvement in the fact that he brought the Rudakabana family here…
Spot on. Dad was something high up in Rwanda, I heard. Alphonse?
Mike is fantastic.
Wow. I've just realised Hodges is not who he claims to be.
Good stuff Mike !
Thank god we have 🤓 intelligent interviewer here.
all the rats running around now trying to cover their arse
Like Farage ?
Does anyone REALLY think bang to rights Axel could have walked ? Utter bollocks
"Mike, Mike, Mike, right, right"
wow, this is the standard of communication from the establishment's apologists.
Mike you are a 🌟 star. You gave him the heave ho. Good on you
BBC - Welsh choir boy
'Local' man.
@truckerfromreno his parents weren't local tho 🤔
The Contempt of Court Act says information can be made public after arrest but not after charges are brought. Isn’t that clear enough?
How can these people genuinely look people in the eye and say phrases like “he could have walked free” 🤯🤯 what a F***ing cop out. As if he was going to walk free because the public found out about his background. What a load of drivel.
Mike you are brilliant
How did the Southport Murderers parents not know what was being made under their roof??
What went on in that monsters house, if he is british born this hatred and ideology came from somewhere, parents and associates should be looked at
If your having a party, or need a Supermarket opening, Dan Hodges is available as a Keir Starmer look a like.
and sound alike
100%!
My queation to Dan Hodges: Do you only get predjucal court protections if you have the "correct" skin colour/relgion?
You seem to think that only the terroist should be given this protection, but all the people who Stamer called far-whyite thugs, for calling the terrorist, a terrorist, shouls not be given the same protection...
No wonder legacy media are dying with hacks like hodges.
We need a Trump to lead this nation and drain the swamp!
Well done Mike. This guy on the left is a loony
I WONT BE BUYING THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
He was arrested on 29 July, but was not charged until 29 October. How can it take 3 months to decide what he would be charged with when they found the ricin and al-qaeda document within hours of the attack!
It took 3 month to tell us and that was before the trial
Not just that he let out disinformation in that time.
Which lawyers are advising journalists though? Are journos being closed down here? We might be suspicious now....
Thanks god for Mike Graham
I hate reporters who don't listen and just want to argue to prove themselves right regardless of facts and the advice of their own lawyers!
Dan Dan the Lefty Man
What shocks me that he works for the Daily Mail, I have always thought right-wing.
He doesn't want the information to be spread becase he doesn't want backlash when the guy gets released with his blessing
This man is an apologist for Keir Starmer.
Publishing a tweet calling everyone arrested after the riots as criminals and saying they will face to full force of the law must have also prejudiced their trials. They were actually labelled criminals before they came to court.
Caught red-handed...
Well done Mike. They're all getting a lesson in real journalism 😊 👏👏👏👏👏
Now i know why i dont.. and never will... read the Mail on Sunday...or any other day.
What I see is the system trying to protect a religion from even more deserved scrutiny and bad press.
That’s exactly what it is. They know we know that too.
Presumably the CPS do as their old boss tells them? And for sure, journos should challenge them, all the time...
Yep, that should have been the question asked to the Liebour mouthpiece. Who exactly at the CPS gave Starmer that advice and given that Starmer is a former Head of that service, I wonder how that conversation went?
Starmer had no problems calling out arrested protesters as far right thugs. He's a total hippocryte.
I'm always quite surprised when I hear a trained police-person say: "I'm arresting you on suspicion of ...", when they have actually just watched the crime being committed, and also, it has been recorded on multiple cameras! 😮
It's called innocent UNTIL proven guilty
Because the police cannot judge ;) common knowledge
Ain’t no media leak or technically that gets you off with his disgusting acts of terror & depravity. That boy is pure unadulterated Islamist evil!!
Hodges was attacking you personally ,questioning your judgement,how you kept your cool was very impressive.
Why was the public told that he was a Welsh choir boy? That was a lie.
Poor Mike , interviewing some right clowns this morning.
OUT OF THE ECHR NOW. AND OUR, SEE THAT OUR, LAWS.
Two Tear Policing under Labour .
This is why the world is in such a terrible state because every body thinks their right and won't backdown even if their wrong.
If I was Welsh Choirboy, I would be furious. It has done their image no good!
What an absolute joke this country has become!!!!
We the people know exactly why he lied...
Mike you are on top form. Thank you.
It doesn't matter what was said before the trial, under the British system, there is zero prospect of a man guilty of such offences walking free. The judge would have dealt with any issues by way of jury directions.
Tell me what this bloke is on if he’s a journalist, he wants to change his job because he’s no good at being a journalist at all he’s got left left left wrote all over him😡
But then again he does not come off as a bright light LOL
Call me stupid, but how could the case be prejudiced when he was caught in the act of committing it? Surely there was no way he would have got away with it.
There is too much evidence to disrupt the trail.. Well done Mike 👍.. Dan is only defending starmer 🤬
I think Hodges has photos of 2TK on his bedside table.
Being told the truth isnt a thing and never has been where the government are concerned.
How can Hodges not see the difference??
What a complete plank. God, this Labour apologist is nausiating. Get him off!
Since when did reporters become the defence for the government?
The jury are told to consider "only the evidence they hear in the court room". He's not walking anywhere the evidence was a strong as you'll ever get in any case.
How many trials did Kier prejudice by calling all those people arrested "far right criminals"?
Hodges is a master of the art of word salad and really is clueless oh and he obviously loves Starmer
But apparently they can be called far right before you are charged.
If killing 3 children,seriously wounding 8 other children and two adults does not constitute as terrorism then this country is finished!
Dan is part of the problem he doesn't know what he's talking about !
Is Dan Hodges Starmer's twin brother?
Looks like 👀😱