Russia has been fighting for two and a half years against a NATO that prepared for eight via a proxy army larger than most of its European members combined while possessing as much hardware. lol.
@@SwedishMeattball You'd be correct if Fox sang a different tune. But yall just want to use Russia for your politics. Listen, Trump was the first to army Ukraine with Stingers and Javelins to the tune of 800 M. He even bragged about it.
This guy's analysis falls apart at the "Devastating conventional attack" on Russia by NATO if Russia uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine, part. That comment is as much a bluff, as anything Putin has said. What does he think a "devastating conventional" attack will elicit from a nation with more than 1000 Strategic ICBMs each holding maybe ten nuclear warheads on it? Do you think that "devastating conventional attack" by NATO will not elicit against America-UK, a punishing strategic nuclear attack? That's the gamble, isn't it? That's the bluff? You think Russia won't do that, because your response will be "We have nukes too." But if your bluff is called, and the West responds with what you call, "a devastating conventional attack" as Russian radar sees this "devastating attack" coming, and Russia gets off its strategic nukes (use them or lose them), then we will let fly our Western nukes. What's result of that? Russia will lose this war in 3 days. America would lose that war in 3 days; UK would lose it in 3 days. Because there won't be anything left to "win" of our two countries. You warmongers are nuts! What we need is a peace agreement to stop this war, not another way to get closer to unleashing Mushroom clouds and firestorms in our respective countries. Because Ukraine's case might be "existential" doesn't mean we have to make our case existential! Ukraine cannot "win" this war on the terms it wants. And the West can't win by forcing Russia into a corner.
You completely fail to realise that Russian nuclear facilities are monitored 24/7. While NATO needs to focus on those, Russia has a lot of targets it claims it wants to destroy just in Ukraine, not to mention in Europe, not to mention around the world. And they have very little clue about those, not to speak about actual capabilities of actually doing so. Do you understand a very basic concept that if you hit a silo or depot, it cannot be used to shoot any more rockets? So this talk about how many thousands ICBMs Russia has is completely useless. Russian launch sites and depots would be destroyed perhaps even preemptively if there was an evidence of activity that would suggest preparations of attack. Just remember them lying about "being on an exercise in Belarus". The plan of their invasion was out before they even started it. While NATO attack would focus on destroying Russian launch sites, depots and command centres, Russia - as it proclaims itself - would launch against actual cities. Do you not understand who do you support here? Regardless of everything that you and I said, Russia has ZERO benefits from using nukes. Nukes are valuable to Russians only when not used. I dare you to name one REAL benefit.
You're missing two points: 1) This war will not be won, it will be lost. And it will be lost in Moskow, when the Military and/or the Russian people have understood Putin is killing Russians and Russias future for nothing. This will be his end and the end of the war. 2) What you call peace agreement would mean Ukraine has to surrender. That's no peace, that's capitulation. Putin has clearly showed he does not stop until he has control over Ukraine. Finally: The warmongers sit in the Kreml, they started the war, they could end it anytime. You seem to have a very Kreml-distorted view on reality.
Thank You Anyone with a gram of intelligence knows this. Times radio is just a comedy show but it’s funded by people with financial interests in weapons and Ukrainian resources.
Russia should know better from their own history: Afghanistan. "Funny" thing: In Ukraine, the Russians tried the same tactics as in Afghanistan with a fast airborn attack to the capital and a pincer movement on the ground with motorized troops. In both wars they failed and paied heavily for it. Still, they didn't pay enough to learn to not start wars.
@@MA-oj8zk Still the same 20% of Ukraine in Russian hands and gaining more. Crimea is Russian and Afghanistan is dealing with Russia now not with US Russian pincers working the same way as before in Pokrovsk and Avdeevka.
Russia does not want to see Kiev fallen, it has a special place in Russian history. It is sacred to the Russians themselves as it is the place where so much of the Russian nation itself started. This is the reason why the Russians withdrew, not because of weakness on their part.
Let's assume if Nato can defeat Russia in three days , that would leave Russia with only one choice and that's using the 6000 nukes that it possess. What would Nato do then ? Counterstrike with nukes and everyone die in the end ?
Part of the agreement to get Ukraine to agree to give up their Nuclear Missiles under the 1994 Budapest Agreement was that Nato would help to protect them in the future, now they are being let down once again like the first time putin invaded Ukraine and took over Crimea. Thousands of lives and Billions of pounds could have been saved...Remember putin is watching all this...God Bless Ukraine from the UK.
I think it was the UK and US that were obligated, not NATO, but yes, we have failed almost entirely. As an Englishman I am so utterly ashamed of my nation with regards to supporting Ukraine. But not as much as Americans should be
@@janthorud The West has been continually underestimating Putin and Russia since this conflict began, they were supposed to be carving up Russia by now and it's not working out for them so can you be certain?
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ lol. you guys sure are poor for having 40% of the worlds resources. didnt the russian economy already collapse in the 1990s? nobody believes your propaganda.
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ Is that why the ruble is collapsing further every day?? Haha. And those "resources" like oil are literally going up in flames every day..
NATO barely did any damage to poorly equiped Serbian forces during 78 day long bombing campaign and tens of thousands of laser guided bombs fired from hundreds of best fighter jets and bombers… and they think they could do any better against modern Russian army…
One person @flanker8724; so far that knows his/her history; and knows more about warfare than Bill Browder. Most of the rest of the comments are from the usual armchair historians and those that lack probity.
The most important factor in starting a war is you have to believe winning will be quick and easy..... Never believe anyone who says defeating an enemy will be quick and easy... they are deceptive war mongers whose motives are not in your favor.
We are taught appeasement didn't work in schools, but war ended up with debts that were not paid off until 2006. How do we know we would not be financially better off today
Appeasement is criticised because there were prior opportunities to stop the Germans and it was left too late. There were never any opportunities to stop the Russians and never will be, the Russians can't be "appeased" because you actually can't do anything to stop them anyway.
David Lee Roth says that old sick people run the world. These super wealthy sick people hate the world and want to end it. The western Oligarchs may be criminally insane.
Peace talks with a dictator that threatens Europe with nuclear war? How does that "peace" look like exactly? Let me guess: you are a school dropout with zero clue about history. Right?
"War with NATO? Look at the power difference. Are you dumb as this table?" - Putin said while knocking on the table. Remember it was an American President that charged the world community "You are with us or against us." Russia never said such a thing. 🇺🇸/👁️\🇷🇺
Well, fact is, Russia obv. is not able to defend its airspace against simple drone attacks, not even its strategically important depots. NATO is able to launch thousands of cruise missles within a couple of hours to take out Russians radars, remaining air defence, strategic control and communication infrastructure. After a couple of hours, the Russian army literally would be sitting in the dark, not knowing what is going on and unable to communicate and coordinate.
We couldn't even beat nk, Vietnam, or Afghanistan in 3 days, let alone russia, Iran, nk and China. This guy is high Edit: we need de-escalation from trump, no more wars, or talks of ww3
Orc world's so called allies have zero interest in a war with the West. This war is not a guerrilla war with sanctuaries just across the border for orcs to hide in. Your single digit iq is showing. 😊
well, we would have beat NK, until china came in and countered the us back to the modern dmz. we also would have beat Vietnam, had the public not found about the strikes on the vietcong HQs inside of Cambodia. but afghanistan is more moder, and that well, we lost. despite all of the NATO might, Biden led our loss to the Taliban.
Europe has the opportunity to not repeat the disastrous policy of appeasement in the 1930's by stopping the 21st murderous dictator invading other nations sooner rather than later. The USA has to continue and expand it's support and vote to keep Putin's American enabler out of the presidency in 2024.
We Americans have to get through our elections in 40 days, and when and if Trump loses.... The U.S. will support ending the limits on Ukraine, supply even more missiles. It's clear that Putin just needs a good shove. Losing half the Russian air force in a week would do it. Do the Russian people even know about the 600,000 casualties? Putin just asked for 180,000 more soldiers. That's a six month supply....
Europe is done! Europe is a joke & falling apart.The appeasement comes from being subservient to the USA state department . They have zero battle ready troops of consequence. They have zero energy,& zero $$$, they are basically collapsed.
Not people,dont insult all of us, only Putin thought he could just 1 of 6 billion people, granted 1 with to much power, but still does not mean he knows better.
This conflict will end when Ukraine and Russia agree to stop fighting. In the meantime NATO members can independently help either side. NATO was originally a defensive alliance, but in the 1990s it got involved in the former Yugoslavia, and this discussion today is about Ukraine. I myself do not want to see NATO boots-on-the-ground fighting for a non-member country. Untold death and destruction would follow.
You're missing one point: NATO also has to eliminate threats to NATO members. Putin at least once a week is threatning to attack NATO members. So do you rather want to wait until the Russian army knocks on your door? You see the parallels to 1936 onwards? Appeasement doesn't work with criminals.
The comedian is determined to keep his post and for that he will drag the world into the abyss... So far sanity and fear from a post civilization scenario has prevented less than clever western leaders from giving a green light for attacking mother Russia... But for how much longer?
No need. He's a multi billionaire and his money has helped liquidated a LOT (thousands) of Russian sons , husbands and fathers. He's doing a good job where he is.
Do you have any concrete arguments against his? No? Only the "front line" trope used by every Russian vatnik out there? Do you think everyone has IQ 80 like yourself?
I wouldn't say they are happy. But why should the western world stop Putin from demilitarise and deindustrialize Russia? Putin's taking Russia out of the game more efficiently than anyone else could.
This depends on two things: 1. If the US is still in NATO. 2. If they go for Putin immediatly. NATO is not in any shape or form going to win a defensive war with Russia, or China. We have seen what Russia is doing in Ukraine, and its only going to get worse as Russia can copy Ukrainian drone tech but the US cannot. And we know that drones are the future of warfare.
I have an idea, but I don't know everything. what I know is that after the fall of the wall, all former Soviet countries joined NATO as soon as possible... By choice, without coercion
@josephkendall9793 NATO and it's member countries have never come up against any country that could match their power or indeed were a nuclear power. Quite simply NATO and it's member countries have never been tested.
@@chisimdibreakthrough1901NATO can absolutely challenge Russia only thing stopping them is Putins obsession with nuclear weapons. This is obvious nobody is scared of Russias conventional army anymore in the slightest.
@@Extra777-longlyOdd, the Ukrainians don’t complain about missing the opportunity to sign a”peace treaty”……or the ruzzians themselves……???……just the pro ruzzies on the internet…….now why would that be? ……hint: B__l S__t.
Putin presented very generous terms for peace two months ago. He also did in Istanbul. Both times rejected by the not to rational Z-Lensky who listened to Boris Johnson's commands like a puppy who just wet the newspaper..
I think you're getting a bit ahead of yourself. Just because they havn't authorised these weapons 'yet' doesn't mean they won't. It took them a while to authorise other things, such as tanks and f-16's for example, and this could be another such example.
Hahaha.... and for your next joke??? He is trying to negotiate peace instead of cleaning out and stop talking. You people with your big mouths needs to be taught a good lesson
@@elessartelcontar9415 Russia is doing a pretty good job, Russia and China combined in every wargaming scenario that has been run always win. This is the first time NATO have fought a technological peer and they are the ones being crippled not Russia. This nonsense is killing Europe. The US is OK they have plenty of mineral wealth and assets on their own land and can pull up the drawbridge, Europe and the EU don't.
What's happening is that NATO is trying to keep Ukraine defended, while avoiding escalation for as long as possible, until they reach the point where they can't be more prepared to take out Russian military capabilities, and they don't have any other choice.
You think wanting peace is magic? It just makes it happen? Are you one of the dopes saying Russia offered a deal? I'll accept that if you accept my deal. You have to go camping with me to hear what the deal is though.
If NATO really would know and be sure it can easely beat ruSSians, why are they not giving their allowance to Ukraine using long range weapons?! Why are they STILL appeasing ruSSian terrorists?! That's so shameful and even annoying as they know, this costs thousands of lives and it's THEIR fault - I couldn't find sleep anymore by knowing that!
It's not NATO, it's the USA, UK, France, Germany, Italy. And at least two of them clearly said, they are willing to allow Ukraine to use their long distance weapons against military targes inside Russia. Atm it's Germany in first place taking an opposite opinion and since these nations agreed to act coordinated, we still are waiting until idiot Scholz is stop blocking.
Putin never said it would take three days to do anything. It was the top general at the Pentagon who stated prior to the SMO that the Russians could take Kiev in three days if they invaded. Please get your "facts" correct.
Any accomodation of a narcissist and his delusions will only make it worse and last longer. Thats how narcissists see any toleerance accomodation,, as s form or weakness and surrender to their own. THEY WILL NOT STOP ON THEIR OWN, they must only be defeated or they will continue to spread their evil
Wrong. Russia can't even stop Ukraine's home made RC planes from striking Moscow. NATO has actual ballistic missile interceptors like Iron sky and Arrow 3 missiles that literally destroy ICBM's before they re-enter the earth atmosphere.
How much of this is propaganda? Seems unlikely that our military would allow pundits to go on the internet and analyse what we are going to do. Its giving the game away.
Times Radio is pure leftwing propaganda. its 24/7 Putin/ russia hate with no actual evidence to support any claim. pure opinion and speculation/ one sided BS
Any sign of weakness triggers Putin to push the boundaries. By not standing up for Ukraine in 2014 when Putin stole crimea we sowed the seeds for this conflict . Do we never learn???
@@9696Don What about Argentina attacking Britain in 1982? NATO, according to its charter, should have responded immediately, but..... The same thing will happen if Russia attacks, for example, Latvia
@@maestro6458 The Falklands War between the United Kingdom and Argentina did not result in NATO involvement because Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that collective self-defense is applicable only to attacks on member state territories north of the Tropic of Cancer. different situation
Yes, Britain was always best off alone. The won the second world war without support from the US and everything became so much better since the Brexit. So....
NATO would wipe the floor with Russia. Putin should expect F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, F-22s, F-35s, AC-130s, A-10s, AH-64s, B-1s, B-2s, B-52s, Tomahawks, UAVs and the list goes on.
NATOs combined military, technological and economic ability to wage war exceeds Russia's by orders of magnitude, its not even close. However, that means that literally the only card Russia has to play is nuclear weapons, which is worrying. Its a choice of precipitous defeat, surrender or nukes (and of course the nukes also mean defeat, but not unavenged defeat). And what's the status of Russia's nuclear arsenal? Is it a functional fleet of land- and sub-launched ICBMs or is it a rusting pile of junk? I daresay that NATO intelligence has some idea but we the public obviously have none. Remember that even NATO intelligence wasn't fully aware quite how dysfunctional Russia's conventional forces were prior to 2022, or if they knew they weren't saying it out loud. Would anyone be insane enough to use nuclear weapons, knowing the inevitable response? My instinct is no, but then I'm not a sociopathic warmongering dictator so I'm probably not the best judge.
What can be done? Vote blue in 50 days. Put in a Democrat president, a democrat senate, and a democrat congress. No guarantees...but if anything could make a difference...it would be THAT. Then they would have no more excuses...and no more obstacles.
The US has far more danger coming in through our porous border. The president's primary job is to protect us. Biden and Kamala are asleep at the wheel. Vote red, my friend!
I agree with your sentiment I plan on doing just that, but I am going to point out that the name of the party is the Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party.
@@Jimbogf Don't worry, Ivan, it won't last long. Now take your pathetic fear-mongering somewhere else. Maybe you can find some little children to scare.
NATO beats Russia in 3 days. What a ridiculous remark! If NATO were that confident of victory, she would have attacked Russia two years ago. This remark is as silly as Johnson wanting to spend a trillion dollars to fight against Russia.
Bill Browder is probably right. If we go to all out war, NATO will likely annihilate Russia in less than 3 days. The problem is Mr. Browder doesn't seems to realize Russia has thousands of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and nuclear capable hypersonic missiles on submarines. If we go to all out nuclear war (and I take Putin seriously when he says we will go there if NATO becomes an existential threat to Russia) millions will die instantly in the USA, Russia and Europe when the bombs (many times more powerful than the ones that detonated in Hiroshima) detonate, many millions more will die in the days, weeks and months following from radiation sickness, untreated wounds, and starvation. Starbucks will be gone, supermarkets will be gone. hospitals will be gone, utilities and internet will be gone. Nobody, including Mr. Bowder (assuming he is even still alive), will think they won when the nuclear war between Russia and America is over.
NATO even if engaged is not likely to even try to retrieve the situation in 3 days. It will be done with slow and deliberate precision over as long as it take to keeps NATO casualties to an absolute minimum and Russian casualties to an absolute maximum. The west knows the value of its well trained, equipped and experience pros in a way Russia could never comprehend. It will be an inexorable dismantling and I doubt there will be any temptation to consider a thunder run to the Russian border. Having said that I could be 100 percent wrong of course.
Just yet another empire (although it amusingly tries to call itself not an empire, puts on a fake facade of freedom/democracy) that overextended and went into Russia so once again Russia must demonstrate that it along with Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires.
Fun Fact about Russia: It was Russia who saved The Union during the American Civil War as they sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and to create a in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops and growing stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre to divert Union troops away from their Southern Confederacy then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as either a puppet state of London or to be fully brought back into the fold of the British Empire. London was already courting (threatening/bribing) other countries to get involved like Spain while Russia was in talks with Prussia to ally with incase London was to intervene. Seeing all of this Tsar Alexander II wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it. There is also a memorial in San Francisco for the hundreds of Russian sailors who came off their Asiatic fleet ships that died while helping the city put out a fire that threatened to lay waste to it during the War.
The Russian fleet also threatened to Shell Australian ports along with other British Pacific Colonies if Britain aided the Confederates. A confederate war ship spent a lot of time in Australian waters and was supported by the Australian public, some even signing on as crew members. This Confederate war ship laid waist to the US Pacific whaling fleet and is reported to have fired the last shot in the war. The name of the ship was called the CSS Shenandoah. Its surrender was at Liverpool England where Confederate Commander Bulloch was stationed. Bulloch was the head spy Chief for the Confederates and main go between for London, Montreal, and Richmond. He was heavily involved in the finance of the South with British banking and supplied the south with its warships as most of them were made by the British. He was good friends with those who drafted the Very discriminatory Confederate Constitution and those that would later create the 'Clan'. He was also heavily involved in the assassinations of Lincoln and his cabinet members. He was Also the Uncle to President Theodore Roosevelt (on his mothers side of course) and Teddy greatly looked up to him and learned much from him from a very early age. Teddy called him 'Uncle Jimmy'. This is where Teddy Roosevelt got the idea for the 'Eff Bee Eye' he modeled it almost exactly from Londons 'Em Eye Five'. Russia also helped Thailand (Kingdom of Siam) maintain its sovereignty from being completely Partitioned/Annexed from the British and French around the same time. The very word Thai (ไทย) means 'free man' in the Thai language which is partially to thank to the Russians as they might have ended up being a colony or part of another country/colony if not for their intervention.
Stay strong. Stay safe, Mr. BROWDER…..The world stage needs to listen-up to your sage voice at the podium……It is ongoingly shocking to think that men like Putin and Trump can wield such coercive control and populous suasion over so many. Takes us right back to the all-good/all-bad mentality and/or wisdom of The Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales……”God Bless Us Everyone”…..Tiny Tim said it best.🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜
Stupidity has to be a blessing... listen to Putin's speech about this, attacks with modern missiles from Ukraine to Russia can only be done technically and in terms of personnel with the help of NATO in this case, so NATO would be a participant in the war ... thats the point!
@@HEMA-NRW You bee souper smarrt to lisssten to Pootin, anyone can access the satellite data lots of companies sell it. Pootin talks out his backside Ivan
Because Ukraine does not have the capability to acquire targets deep inside Russia. It will take NATO satellites, intelligence and personnel to program these long range missiles to hit targets in Russia. The ramifications of that are really dangerous for everybody on the face of this earth
no they didn't... *we said that* specifically General Mark Milley told lawmakers that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours if a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine
This is nonsense. It is impossible for him to lose a war against NATO in 3 days. He would definitely lose, but it would take MONTHS for the logistics to get all the men and materiel in place to counter him.
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щyou lot can’t even take Kyiv. Bit embarrassing. Meanwhile Putin and his oligarchs continue to rob Russia dry - again a bit embarrassing 😮
72 minutes to the nuclear winter 😂
Russia has been fighting for two and a half years against a NATO that prepared for eight via a proxy army larger than most of its European members combined while possessing as much hardware. lol.
@@anthonystewart677 NATO nations have yet to deploy. What's your point?
russia is not iraq or libya it has friends too very powerful friends
They are wolves and would be the first to take advantage. China already wants parts of russian land
Nato was fighting TALIBAN for 20 years and was humiliated Imagine what will suffer against Rassians and their powerfull allies
yeah like china whos economy is dependent on the west
@@savvaschristou7677 Other Circumstances Mountains. Russia only Ural.
Lol there friends even there closest Allie china don't even want to help 😂 russia the clown of war 😂
Americans talking about mentally Disturbed leaders is hilarious 😂😂😂
Especially when they didn’t have mentally stable president since Truman…Except JFK
@@SwedishMeattball You'd be correct if Fox sang a different tune. But yall just want to use Russia for your politics. Listen, Trump was the first to army Ukraine with Stingers and Javelins to the tune of 800 M. He even bragged about it.
It is not hilarious, we speak from experience, our current administration is full of them. Hopefully the future is better....
@@SwedishMeattball The inference is Trump
@@TexasNEV Even more if Dopey Don gets in
This guy's analysis falls apart at the "Devastating conventional attack" on Russia by NATO if Russia uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine, part. That comment is as much a bluff, as anything Putin has said. What does he think a "devastating conventional" attack will elicit from a nation with more than 1000 Strategic ICBMs each holding maybe ten nuclear warheads on it? Do you think that "devastating conventional attack" by NATO will not elicit against America-UK, a punishing strategic nuclear attack? That's the gamble, isn't it? That's the bluff? You think Russia won't do that, because your response will be "We have nukes too." But if your bluff is called, and the West responds with what you call, "a devastating conventional attack" as Russian radar sees this "devastating attack" coming, and Russia gets off its strategic nukes (use them or lose them), then we will let fly our Western nukes. What's result of that? Russia will lose this war in 3 days. America would lose that war in 3 days; UK would lose it in 3 days. Because there won't be anything left to "win" of our two countries. You warmongers are nuts! What we need is a peace agreement to stop this war, not another way to get closer to unleashing Mushroom clouds and firestorms in our respective countries. Because Ukraine's case might be "existential" doesn't mean we have to make our case existential! Ukraine cannot "win" this war on the terms it wants. And the West can't win by forcing Russia into a corner.
You completely fail to realise that Russian nuclear facilities are monitored 24/7. While NATO needs to focus on those, Russia has a lot of targets it claims it wants to destroy just in Ukraine, not to mention in Europe, not to mention around the world. And they have very little clue about those, not to speak about actual capabilities of actually doing so.
Do you understand a very basic concept that if you hit a silo or depot, it cannot be used to shoot any more rockets? So this talk about how many thousands ICBMs Russia has is completely useless. Russian launch sites and depots would be destroyed perhaps even preemptively if there was an evidence of activity that would suggest preparations of attack. Just remember them lying about "being on an exercise in Belarus". The plan of their invasion was out before they even started it.
While NATO attack would focus on destroying Russian launch sites, depots and command centres, Russia - as it proclaims itself - would launch against actual cities. Do you not understand who do you support here?
Regardless of everything that you and I said, Russia has ZERO benefits from using nukes. Nukes are valuable to Russians only when not used. I dare you to name one REAL benefit.
Bravo to you ❤ Very well said.!!
You're missing two points:
1) This war will not be won, it will be lost. And it will be lost in Moskow, when the Military and/or the Russian people have understood Putin is killing Russians and Russias future for nothing. This will be his end and the end of the war.
2) What you call peace agreement would mean Ukraine has to surrender. That's no peace, that's capitulation. Putin has clearly showed he does not stop until he has control over Ukraine.
Finally: The warmongers sit in the Kreml, they started the war, they could end it anytime. You seem to have a very Kreml-distorted view on reality.
Thank You
Anyone with a gram of intelligence knows this.
Times radio is just a comedy show but it’s funded by people with financial interests in weapons and Ukrainian resources.
Finally, some sense in the comments.
This is how the US lost the war in Vietnam. They have not learned from the experience. Pathetic.
Russia should know better from their own history: Afghanistan. "Funny" thing: In Ukraine, the Russians tried the same tactics as in Afghanistan with a fast airborn attack to the capital and a pincer movement on the ground with motorized troops. In both wars they failed and paied heavily for it. Still, they didn't pay enough to learn to not start wars.
The reason US lost his war in Vietnam because of corruption, Lyndon Johnson is so corrupt
@@MA-oj8zk Still the same 20% of Ukraine in Russian hands and gaining more. Crimea is Russian and Afghanistan is dealing with Russia now not with US Russian pincers working the same way as before in Pokrovsk and Avdeevka.
US did not lose war in Vietnam. They lost reason to be there.
54K vs anywhere from 0.5 to 1.5 Million of military personnel is hardly losing it.
@@alexanderlazarev3570 Last I checked it was down to 18%..
American general Milley said that Kiev would fall in 3 days. Yugoslavia didn't lose against NATO in 3 days. This is a joke.
By loose they dont mean surrender as mucj as taking so much dammage they would be doomed to failure
This is a Coping channel. The west can't even supply Ukraine with enough tank shells.
The big joke was Milley.
Russia does not want to see Kiev fallen, it has a special place in Russian history. It is sacred to the Russians themselves as it is the place where so much of the Russian nation itself started. This is the reason why the Russians withdrew, not because of weakness on their part.
@@peterchristie1096100%. Also, it is not the goal. "SVO" has its goals, said and written. Taking Kiev is on the list at all.
Let's assume if Nato can defeat Russia in three days , that would leave Russia with only one choice and that's using the 6000 nukes that it possess.
What would Nato do then ? Counterstrike with nukes and everyone die in the end ?
Part of the agreement to get Ukraine to agree to give up their Nuclear Missiles under the 1994 Budapest Agreement was that Nato would help to protect them in the future, now they are being let down once again like the first time putin invaded Ukraine and took over Crimea. Thousands of lives and Billions of pounds could have been saved...Remember putin is watching all this...God Bless Ukraine from the UK.
Precisely.
Exactly 💯
I think it was the UK and US that were obligated, not NATO, but yes, we have failed almost entirely.
As an Englishman I am so utterly ashamed of my nation with regards to supporting Ukraine.
But not as much as Americans should be
They believed the West. They should have known better to trust Russia.
Nuclear weapon in Ukraine belonged to Russia.
We can send this guy to the frontline
Haha, I love it how this has become the only argument morally corrupt people like yourself have against solid hard facts. Try harder, weakling.
The guy in red?
Do you like UA-cam, "Mike"?
He wouldn't last 3 minutes.
@@xman1976a The guy in red ? 😁😁😁😁😁The lady in red you mean to say
You cant be serious? The world would lose in 3 hours with Russia unleashing all its nukes!
JESUS SAID GIVE AND YOU WILL RECEIVE❤❤❤
@@Babayaga97111 That's exactly what Putin is doing now.
Putin would'nt dare use nukes!
@@janthorud The West has been continually underestimating Putin and Russia since this conflict began, they were supposed to be carving up Russia by now and it's not working out for them so can you be certain?
So... everyone would lose if anyone released all their nukes. Duh of course. Like what is your point?
What a load of garbage
They prefer to be called "Russia".
@@tomw.6757 Christ your on top of your game
@@vernonsmith6965 Do you like UA-cam, "Vernon"?
Propaganda, get your propaganda here........
Russia has already defeated NATO allies who are fighting for Ukraine with their weapons & soldiers.
True
Russia has not and would not beat NATO in a direct confrontation.
READ IT AND WEEP.
Russian KIA. 634,000
Ukrainian KIA. 126,000
NATO KIA. 0
There are no nato soldiers on the ground what are u smoking???? If nato boots were on the ground you would know bot.🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@shannonwasserman3653 Behind every Russian bot stands a terrified Russian draft dodger.
Russia has a lot of money outside of Russia, this should be seized to rebuild Ukraine. You would not stop this war, but you'll prevent future wars.
Россия имеет 40 процентов мировых ресурсов. Деньги у нас есть а вот США банкрот и имеет минус 35 триллионов долга. Как проценты будете платить
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ lol. you guys sure are poor for having 40% of the worlds resources. didnt the russian economy already collapse in the 1990s? nobody believes your propaganda.
For Ukraine to be rebuilt there has to be humans left to rebuild it !!!
@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ bah! the biggest resource is people, science and technology... not rocks and dead plankton
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ Is that why the ruble is collapsing further every day?? Haha. And those "resources" like oil are literally going up in flames every day..
This man is full of B.S.
Do you like UA-cam, "Eric"?
Hes a criminal
This war propaganda he trying to get the USA into a hot war risking all our nuclear war for the sake of our children we must stop this war
@@MoonlightVKV Who, Browder? Explain how.
List to Eric, as if there is someone who really knows about B.S., it's Eric.
NATO barely did any damage to poorly equiped Serbian forces during 78 day long bombing campaign and tens of thousands of laser guided bombs fired from hundreds of best fighter jets and bombers… and they think they could do any better against modern Russian army…
One person @flanker8724; so far that knows his/her history; and knows more about warfare than Bill Browder. Most of the rest of the comments are from the usual armchair historians and those that lack probity.
Not correct. NATO rendered the Serbian army completely inmobile. And that was the goal. It has never been the goal to distory the Serbian army.
@@MA-oj8zk I don’t know what you’re talking about…
@@MA-oj8zk Correct it was designed to stop a genocide and it brought that to a halt.
A what Russian army? What Russian Army - a shambles of a military. Is delusion that complete in Russhitstainia?
An aspiring oligarch got booted out of russia and has been mad ever since.
The most important factor in starting a war is you have to believe winning will be quick and easy..... Never believe anyone who says defeating an enemy will be quick and easy... they are deceptive war mongers whose motives are not in your favor.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Times Radio thanks for the comedy show.
Three days??? That's the exact time the US took to destroy Afghanistan!!!!!!!
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sure smells like appeasement to me.
We are taught appeasement didn't work in schools, but war ended up with debts that were not paid off until 2006. How do we know we would not be financially better off today
Appeasement is criticised because there were prior opportunities to stop the Germans and it was left too late. There were never any opportunities to stop the Russians and never will be, the Russians can't be "appeased" because you actually can't do anything to stop them anyway.
David Lee Roth says that old sick people run the world. These super wealthy sick people hate the world and want to end it. The western Oligarchs may be criminally insane.
NATO would lose in 1 Day mister
Only in your dreams
So Russia is just toying with Ukraine then? Ok
@@michaeldunham3385no, Russia will win bro. USA is targeted by many country. West people is arrogant. Trust me, think carefully.
lol - Russia will bring their T-55 to the front
@@michaeldunham3385 your dream
So all out nuclear war because he won't stop? What about a peace talk, have you taught of that genius?
There's no money to be made in diplomacy
Nobody is scared of Russia or their nukes.
@@JustAUsername-i5l Very demented opinion. But I am sure you think you are edgy.
Peace talks with a dictator that threatens Europe with nuclear war? How does that "peace" look like exactly? Let me guess: you are a school dropout with zero clue about history. Right?
Bankers want their wars to continue.
We would all "lose the war" "against NATO" in far shorter time than 3 days. I reckon roughly 30 minutes. How far is your shelter by the way?
Putin is holding the whole world by the nuts.... And he is having the last laugh...
No dictator has ever had the last laugh.
@@oasis67 Like the U.S dictatorship or empire you mean?
The US will be defeated
@@MoonlightVKV Ah, the old "I know you are but what am I" response. The classic I dont have a relevant point to make.
@@oasis67 Mentally ill murican classic. No i say it like it actually is.
He forgot his med again 😂😂😂
"War with NATO? Look at the power difference. Are you dumb as this table?"
- Putin said while knocking on the table.
Remember it was an American President that charged the world community "You are with us or against us." Russia never said such a thing.
🇺🇸/👁️\🇷🇺
in 3 days ? is Bill a military expert ? why follow anything this guy says ?
Well, fact is, Russia obv. is not able to defend its airspace against simple drone attacks, not even its strategically important depots. NATO is able to launch thousands of cruise missles within a couple of hours to take out Russians radars, remaining air defence, strategic control and communication infrastructure. After a couple of hours, the Russian army literally would be sitting in the dark, not knowing what is going on and unable to communicate and coordinate.
We couldn't even beat nk, Vietnam, or Afghanistan in 3 days, let alone russia, Iran, nk and China. This guy is high
Edit: we need de-escalation from trump, no more wars, or talks of ww3
Orc world's so called allies have zero interest in a war with the West. This war is not a guerrilla war with sanctuaries just across the border for orcs to hide in. Your single digit iq is showing. 😊
@@Thekulprit92 This guy is dangerous and delusional.
Russia is incredibly weak and incompetent.
Oh look, another insane person believing an incoherent self-centred narcissist fake Christian convicted felon is a good representation of his beliefs.
well, we would have beat NK, until china came in and countered the us back to the modern dmz. we also would have beat Vietnam, had the public not found about the strikes on the vietcong HQs inside of Cambodia. but afghanistan is more moder, and that well, we lost. despite all of the NATO might, Biden led our loss to the Taliban.
Europe has the opportunity to not repeat the disastrous policy of appeasement in the 1930's by stopping the 21st murderous dictator invading other nations sooner rather than later. The USA has to continue and expand it's support and vote to keep Putin's American enabler out of the presidency in 2024.
Looks like Putin is trying with an AK giving Trump the experience of the front line!
We Americans have to get through our elections in 40 days, and when and if Trump loses.... The U.S. will support ending the limits on Ukraine, supply even more missiles. It's clear that Putin just needs a good shove. Losing half the Russian air force in a week would do it. Do the Russian people even know about the 600,000 casualties?
Putin just asked for 180,000 more soldiers. That's a six month supply....
@@primafacie9721 this is not IRAQ , AFGHANISTAN, SERBIA OR LIBYA. It is Russia any miscalculation equals mass destruction, they know the game too
That kind of thinking will cause nuclear war
Europe is done! Europe is a joke & falling apart.The appeasement comes from being subservient to the USA state department . They have zero battle ready troops of consequence. They have zero energy,& zero $$$, they are basically collapsed.
Who does he think he can threaten !!! NATO is not Moldavie !!! 😊
NATO is the aggressor.
Look at the history. Its not what the mainstream has been feeding you
ua-cam.com/video/1Oo4JCMm5S0/v-deo.html
NATO has proven itself ineffective,that's clear
And Russia is not Iraq or Belorus
Why does everyone think you can win a war in 3 days....no one has ever won a war in 3 days.
People just don't learn the lesson.
This man is an obsessive self promoter. He’s good at it and Times Radio throws him on for 15 minutes whenever they have a slow news day.
Cope harder comrade bill@@BillLowenburg
Not people,dont insult all of us, only Putin thought he could just 1 of 6 billion people, granted 1 with to much power, but still does not mean he knows better.
After 3 days all his best units would be bombarded by a fleet of western jets
Russia lost in Ukraine in 3 days.
. . .
Isaiah 34:5-10 YahlleluYah _Yashara'el!
This conflict will end when Ukraine and Russia agree to stop fighting. In the meantime NATO members can independently help either side. NATO was originally a defensive alliance, but in the 1990s it got involved in the former Yugoslavia, and this discussion today is about Ukraine. I myself do not want to see NATO boots-on-the-ground fighting for a non-member country. Untold death and destruction would follow.
@@Stilicho19801 Borris Johnson tore up the Peace Agreement.
It will end if Trump wins
You're missing one point: NATO also has to eliminate threats to NATO members. Putin at least once a week is threatning to attack NATO members. So do you rather want to wait until the Russian army knocks on your door? You see the parallels to 1936 onwards? Appeasement doesn't work with criminals.
Im not sure Nato could withstand potatoes been thrown with force and old woman with rolling pins?
If so, why don't you move to Russia as your safe haven?
@@MA-oj8zkthat is actually a good idea, no woke, gender bending, illegal migrant invasion going on in Russia
The comedian is determined to keep his post and for that he will drag the world into the abyss...
So far sanity and fear from a post civilization scenario has prevented less than clever western leaders from giving a green light for attacking mother Russia...
But for how much longer?
BB is another lunatic… our world has turned into a cesspit of insanity …
@@fingerprint8479 It has already happened, yet civilization endures.
Send this guy to the front lines to
Agreed, anybody war mongering can go first
Feel free to move out of your NATO-aligned country if you don’t like the prospect of fighting for your national security.
No need. He's a multi billionaire and his money has helped liquidated a LOT (thousands) of Russian sons , husbands and fathers. He's doing a good job where he is.
@@richardsanders.4624 "Russians are dying... money well spent." Senator Linsey Graham.
Do you have any concrete arguments against his? No? Only the "front line" trope used by every Russian vatnik out there? Do you think everyone has IQ 80 like yourself?
Three days against red October and hypersonic gifts! We couldn't even beat the Taliban in three days!
The taliban were hiding amongst civilians. If the US wanted to wipe out the whole country they could’ve easily
Bill … do you enjoy life ?
Because you are not too concerned about death …
All over an Eastern European historical border dispute …
One thing that you Guys didn't touch: What about all the Ukrainians being killed by the Lunatic?
Agree
What lunatic?
How about all the Ukrainians killed by the Ukrainian government?
@@danielwillens5876 Putin.
@@danielwillens5876 Zelensky and his tribe.
He’s already fighting a proxy war with nato. This war would have been over a long time ago if it wasn’t for nato support.
Support for Ukraine in the form of assitance has come from countries worldwide.
Gee, you must have graduated at the top of your class buddy, how do you do it? Such insight, wow!
I think the truth is that the US is happy to see the war grind on
I wouldn't say they are happy. But why should the western world stop Putin from demilitarise and deindustrialize Russia? Putin's taking Russia out of the game more efficiently than anyone else could.
This depends on two things:
1. If the US is still in NATO.
2. If they go for Putin immediatly.
NATO is not in any shape or form going to win a defensive war with Russia, or China. We have seen what Russia is doing in Ukraine, and its only going to get worse as Russia can copy Ukrainian drone tech but the US cannot. And we know that drones are the future of warfare.
Russia would never fight a conventional war against Nato.
They've been doing so for two years now, and they're holding their own.
Yep, sure. Never happened in human history. Or.. wait a sec..
@@mikerevendale4810nope :)
In 3 days, the world will be unlivable in most parts. Real smart.
Eventually the whole world once the radiation cloud sweeps the globe, plus it would probably trigger a nuclear winter.🤔
The future is going to be quite different for russia now that we have seen what they are capable of.
What are they capable of?
@@LesreallyMiserablenot much 🤷🏻
@@LesreallyMiserable What we've seen.
Very little. Nobody is scared anymore
@@Piden-l4b Russia haven't taken the gloves off yet and they would beat the US hands down in a land conflict.
If Putin is really that tough, why is he only attacking the eastern tip of Ukraine?
When he attacks all of Ukraine now, it's still hypocrites like you that will come out and start shouting that Putin is escalating.
You don't understand the conflict clearly or wouldn't be asking that
I have an idea, but I don't know everything.
what I know is that after the fall of the wall, all former Soviet countries joined NATO as soon as possible...
By choice, without coercion
@@Kalenelis
Of course the CIA were all over those places.
How old are you?
Agree Russia can’t beat Ukraine and won’t challenge NATO
NATO won't challenge Russia either, else it would have done so by now.
If NATO ever dreams of such, the price will be too high for it to pay.
@josephkendall9793 NATO and it's member countries have never come up against any country that could match their power or indeed were a nuclear power. Quite simply NATO and it's member countries have never been tested.
@@chisimdibreakthrough1901NATO can absolutely challenge Russia only thing stopping them is Putins obsession with nuclear weapons. This is obvious nobody is scared of Russias conventional army anymore in the slightest.
ua-cam.com/video/1Oo4JCMm5S0/v-deo.html
@@boota1979 And you better not, NATO controls more than 50% of all the military power in the world...
Bill is back some more silly bedtime stories!! Fantastic.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ukraine needs the aid promised to them.
...to keep the forever war going. If you want peace agreements however, stop supplying the weapons.
Ну да. Они же именно из-за этого и не подписали мир в 22 году, что англосаксы им по ушам проехались.
@@Extra777-longlyOdd, the Ukrainians don’t complain about missing the opportunity to sign a”peace treaty”……or the ruzzians themselves……???……just the pro ruzzies on the internet…….now why would that be? ……hint: B__l S__t.
@@Extra777-longlyBTW, welcome to YT, four month old account. 🤫
@@bricktopperheadon5490 я потерял телефон, просто создал новый. Так проще. С этими почтами и паролями голову сломаешь.
3 days huh? that's nice! May be they should try to go remove Taliban or something!
Is there some way to ensure the interviewer's face is not blocked by her microphone?
Putin presented very generous terms for peace two months ago. He also did in Istanbul. Both times rejected by the not to rational Z-Lensky who listened to Boris Johnson's commands like a puppy who just wet the newspaper..
Correction, - 2 days..
it would take only 3 hours
Two hours, Curtis LeMay dixit.
Hahaha
3 days seems to be a common timeline used by people who are blindly misinformed.
Slobodon Millosovich and Saddam beg to differ
How long do you think Russia would last against 32 countries in a direct confrontation?
Russia has NO army left. It's been decimated in Ukraine. NATO hasn't lost a single one of their 3.5 million soldiers.
@@MrCaleb.You think other people will not support Russia when 32 countries gang up against one. Think twice
@@MrCaleb.And Russia is exhausted, and running out of resources.
Aargh! I understand why he would think so, but l have learned to be skeptical of any war to be won in 3 days 😉
Crazy politics 😅
Browder is probably my favourite guest. Immense respect for him and his message.
Browser is a criminal and a f..k head 😂😂😂
Looks he is ready to go directly to annihilation of this planet. Totally unhinged.
LOL hes a criminal you muppet!
I think you're getting a bit ahead of yourself. Just because they havn't authorised these weapons 'yet' doesn't mean they won't. It took them a while to authorise other things, such as tanks and f-16's for example, and this could be another such example.
Hahaha.... and for your next joke??? He is trying to negotiate peace instead of cleaning out and stop talking. You people with your big mouths needs to be taught a good lesson
NATO isn't invincible 😂😂😂
They are as far as Russia is concerned.
A tiger isn't invincible either, except to an ant.
Who, pray tell, on this planet can defeat NATO, Einstein? 😅🤣😂😜🤪🙄
No one wins it goes nuclear we all lose
@@elessartelcontar9415 Russia is doing a pretty good job, Russia and China combined in every wargaming scenario that has been run always win. This is the first time NATO have fought a technological peer and they are the ones being crippled not Russia. This nonsense is killing Europe. The US is OK they have plenty of mineral wealth and assets on their own land and can pull up the drawbridge, Europe and the EU don't.
How so? Those who knows military strategy are saying a war between Russia and NATO will cause both Russia and NATO to loose
What's happening is that NATO is trying to keep Ukraine defended, while avoiding escalation for as long as possible, until they reach the point where they can't be more prepared to take out Russian military capabilities, and they don't have any other choice.
But NATO has been fighting the war on behalf of Ukraine. Yet NATO ant win.
LOL Ivan's are funny, your government tells you lies so it won't be embarrassed. NATO is not in the war for the millionth time..
You're brainwashed
What the heck is "ant win"???
I believe it was supposed to read "can't" win. Not "ant" win.
These people would seek peace if they were forced to go to the frontline 😂😂😂
You think wanting peace is magic? It just makes it happen? Are you one of the dopes saying Russia offered a deal? I'll accept that if you accept my deal. You have to go camping with me to hear what the deal is though.
Correct but Putin won;t send his kids his military aged sons to the frontline. He prefers them living in the West.
If NATO really would know and be sure it can easely beat ruSSians, why are they not giving their allowance to Ukraine using long range weapons?! Why are they STILL appeasing ruSSian terrorists?! That's so shameful and even annoying as they know, this costs thousands of lives and it's THEIR fault - I couldn't find sleep anymore by knowing that!
It's not NATO, it's the USA, UK, France, Germany, Italy. And at least two of them clearly said, they are willing to allow Ukraine to use their long distance weapons against military targes inside Russia. Atm it's Germany in first place taking an opposite opinion and since these nations agreed to act coordinated, we still are waiting until idiot Scholz is stop blocking.
Great to see all our global communities making their contribution towards international cultural enrichment.
We would all be obliterated if any conflict with nato happened!
And there would not be much of nato left either
Russia is at war with NATO and it’s been more than 3 days. NATO can’t win Russia in 3 days that’s just arrogant
You trippin russia cant even finish what they started 😂
Putin never said it would take three days to do anything. It was the top general at the Pentagon who stated prior to the SMO that the Russians could take Kiev in three days if they invaded. Please get your "facts" correct.
Yap tvoya mat, svinya//
Yes, they must get their facts straight before this guy distorts them
Purin DID say that he could take Kyiv in 3 days. It's you who needs to get your "facts" straight.
@@JamesStreet-tp1vb He never said that. Now go google and try to find any source that mentions Putin saying something like that
Keep dreaming 😂 it’s the first time fighting against 30 NATO countries. Thats chaos. lol
NATO lost the war with Russia 2 years ago
Don't forget China... If Nato directly involved in war with Russia China may help Russia who know? Don't underestimate your enemy.
always grateful for Bill Browder's steadfast soberness - not at least as there have been right here on TR disturbingly distorted voices
Any accomodation of a narcissist and his delusions will only make it worse and last longer.
Thats how narcissists see any toleerance accomodation,, as s form or weakness and surrender to their own.
THEY WILL NOT STOP ON THEIR OWN, they must only be defeated or they will continue to spread their evil
Just like Trump, Daniel Ortega and Modero.
We would lose against nuclear war.
Everyone loses nuclear war?
Wrong. Russia can't even stop Ukraine's home made RC planes from striking Moscow. NATO has actual ballistic missile interceptors like Iron sky and Arrow 3 missiles that literally destroy ICBM's before they re-enter the earth atmosphere.
It's not the end times yet this year
It's not the end times yet this year
It's not the end times yet this year
How much of this is propaganda? Seems unlikely that our military would allow pundits to go on the internet and analyse what we are going to do. Its giving the game away.
Times Radio is pure leftwing propaganda. its 24/7 Putin/ russia hate with no actual evidence to support any claim. pure opinion and speculation/ one sided BS
I wish putin was our leader In uk
Any sign of weakness triggers Putin to push the boundaries. By not standing up for Ukraine in 2014 when Putin stole crimea we sowed the seeds for this conflict . Do we never learn???
BILL Browder would make a good PRESIDENT!!! 👍👍
Maybe VP first though..😊
In what party? The Trump Maga-fied GOP?!
Educate yourself
You mean humanity would end in 3 days!???
Putin is the demon on earth
Humanity has already ended in Russia 2.5 years ago. I think you mean mankind.
In its entire history, NAto has only attacked small countries and has never defended any of its members.
they have never been challenged and you dont want to find out lol
@@9696Don What about Argentina attacking Britain in 1982? NATO, according to its charter, should have responded immediately, but.....
The same thing will happen if Russia attacks, for example, Latvia
never HAD to defend....
@@maestro6458 The Falklands War between the United Kingdom and Argentina did not result in NATO involvement because Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that collective self-defense is applicable only to attacks on member state territories north of the Tropic of Cancer. different situation
@@memirandawong what about Argentina?
love you bill and a big thanks for your fight
Absolutely shameful. Britain does not need America's go ahead on everything.
Yes, Britain was always best off alone. The won the second world war without support from the US and everything became so much better since the Brexit. So....
@@MA-oj8zk What on earth does Brexit have to do with allowing Ukraine to fire long range weapons?
why have war when we can have peace
There will be no peace when Russia is there! They took Crimea in 2014 and now other parts of Ukraine! Thats not how peace happens!
Have you been asleep? Because Putin wants war. He wants a new world order. That's why he invaded Ukraine.
peace isn't profitable
@@sodium7127 Agreed. Putin is getting his 60% of all military contract payments.
NATO would wipe the floor with Russia. Putin should expect F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, F-22s, F-35s, AC-130s, A-10s, AH-64s, B-1s, B-2s, B-52s, Tomahawks, UAVs and the list goes on.
Perhaps they need to see a US carrier battle group in the Baltics to ease their enthusiasm
warthog goes brrrrrrrrrrrrttt
NATOs combined military, technological and economic ability to wage war exceeds Russia's by orders of magnitude, its not even close. However, that means that literally the only card Russia has to play is nuclear weapons, which is worrying. Its a choice of precipitous defeat, surrender or nukes (and of course the nukes also mean defeat, but not unavenged defeat).
And what's the status of Russia's nuclear arsenal? Is it a functional fleet of land- and sub-launched ICBMs or is it a rusting pile of junk? I daresay that NATO intelligence has some idea but we the public obviously have none. Remember that even NATO intelligence wasn't fully aware quite how dysfunctional Russia's conventional forces were prior to 2022, or if they knew they weren't saying it out loud.
Would anyone be insane enough to use nuclear weapons, knowing the inevitable response? My instinct is no, but then I'm not a sociopathic warmongering dictator so I'm probably not the best judge.
You do realise ballistic missles and drones is the new War strategically . Aircraft carriers etc... would be sunk before arriving lol..
Russia will win. Do not believe in propaganda.
Isaiah 14:1✊🏿🕳️
What can be done? Vote blue in 50 days. Put in a Democrat president, a democrat senate, and a democrat congress. No guarantees...but if anything could make a difference...it would be THAT. Then they would have no more excuses...and no more obstacles.
The US has far more danger coming in through our porous border. The president's primary job is to protect us. Biden and Kamala are asleep at the wheel. Vote red, my friend!
I agree with your sentiment I plan on doing just that, but I am going to point out that the name of the party is the Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party.
No more obstacles for WW3 to start...
@@Jimbogf Don't worry, Ivan, it won't last long. Now take your pathetic fear-mongering somewhere else. Maybe you can find some little children to scare.
@@Jimbogf Take your fearmongering somewhere else, Ivan. Maybe you can find some little children to scare.
NATO beats Russia in 3 days. What a ridiculous remark!
If NATO were that confident of victory, she would have attacked Russia two years ago.
This remark is as silly as Johnson wanting to spend a trillion dollars to fight against Russia.
Someone once said: “Nobody wants war, just the threat of war.”
Every life wants war ... thats the way life lives
Famous last words, we can do this in three days,...
Bill Browder is probably right. If we go to all out war, NATO will likely annihilate Russia in less than 3 days. The problem is Mr. Browder doesn't seems to realize Russia has thousands of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and nuclear capable hypersonic missiles on submarines. If we go to all out nuclear war (and I take Putin seriously when he says we will go there if NATO becomes an existential threat to Russia) millions will die instantly in the USA, Russia and Europe when the bombs (many times more powerful than the ones that detonated in Hiroshima) detonate, many millions more will die in the days, weeks and months following from radiation sickness, untreated wounds, and starvation. Starbucks will be gone, supermarkets will be gone. hospitals will be gone, utilities and internet will be gone. Nobody, including Mr. Bowder (assuming he is even still alive), will think they won when the nuclear war between Russia and America is over.
NATO even if engaged is not likely to even try to retrieve the situation in 3 days. It will be done with slow and deliberate precision over as long as it take to keeps NATO casualties to an absolute minimum and Russian casualties to an absolute maximum. The west knows the value of its well trained, equipped and experience pros in a way Russia could never comprehend. It will be an inexorable dismantling and I doubt there will be any temptation to consider a thunder run to the Russian border.
Having said that I could be 100 percent wrong of course.
Napoleon and the nazis didn’t have much luck in Russia. If I were nato and the west I would be leaving Russia well enough alone.
Just yet another empire (although it amusingly tries to call itself not an empire, puts on a fake facade of freedom/democracy) that overextended and went into Russia so once again Russia must demonstrate that it along with Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires.
NATO can beat Russia in 3 days… is very hilarious.
Is it? You cannot even beat Ukraine 🇺🇦 😂 NATO are ten times more powerful than Russia. FACT
@@Klown84 On paper and Hollywood movies! The West lost all the wars against Russia. NATO is just a paper tiger who can't defeat even the Houthis
@@Klown84If they were, wouldn't the war end by now😂 come on little bro, russia army is now the second largest
Yes NATO can beat Russia in 3 days. NATO as 32 Military Countries not just USA 😅
@@fearlesss-b6106, their weapons are even inferior to Russian ones.
So delusional 😂😂😂
Fun Fact about Russia: It was Russia who saved The Union during the American Civil War as they sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and to create a in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops and growing stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre to divert Union troops away from their Southern Confederacy then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as either a puppet state of London or to be fully brought back into the fold of the British Empire.
London was already courting (threatening/bribing) other countries to get involved like Spain while Russia was in talks with Prussia to ally with incase London was to intervene.
Seeing all of this Tsar Alexander II wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it.
There is also a memorial in San Francisco for the hundreds of Russian sailors who came off their Asiatic fleet ships that died while helping the city put out a fire that threatened to lay waste to it during the War.
The Russian fleet also threatened to Shell Australian ports along with other British Pacific Colonies if Britain aided the Confederates. A confederate war ship spent a lot of time in Australian waters and was supported by the Australian public, some even signing on as crew members. This Confederate war ship laid waist to the US Pacific whaling fleet and is reported to have fired the last shot in the war. The name of the ship was called the CSS Shenandoah. Its surrender was at Liverpool England where Confederate Commander Bulloch was stationed.
Bulloch was the head spy Chief for the Confederates and main go between for London, Montreal, and Richmond. He was heavily involved in the finance of the South with British banking and supplied the south with its warships as most of them were made by the British. He was good friends with those who drafted the Very discriminatory Confederate Constitution and those that would later create the 'Clan'. He was also heavily involved in the assassinations of Lincoln and his cabinet members. He was Also the Uncle to President Theodore Roosevelt (on his mothers side of course) and Teddy greatly looked up to him and learned much from him from a very early age. Teddy called him 'Uncle Jimmy'. This is where Teddy Roosevelt got the idea for the 'Eff Bee Eye' he modeled it almost exactly from Londons 'Em Eye Five'.
Russia also helped Thailand (Kingdom of Siam) maintain its sovereignty from being completely Partitioned/Annexed from the British and French around the same time. The very word Thai (ไทย) means 'free man' in the Thai language which is partially to thank to the Russians as they might have ended up being a colony or part of another country/colony if not for their intervention.
Stay strong. Stay safe, Mr. BROWDER…..The world stage needs to listen-up to your sage voice at the podium……It is ongoingly shocking to think that men like Putin and Trump can wield such coercive control and populous suasion over so many. Takes us right back to the all-good/all-bad mentality and/or wisdom of The Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales……”God Bless Us Everyone”…..Tiny Tim said it best.🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜🌻💜
Putin launches long range missiles into Ukraine, but threatens nukes if they do it back lol
Wouldn’t surprise me if Putin turns at least one European city to glass if he loses the vast bulk of his military
Stupidity has to be a blessing... listen to Putin's speech about this, attacks with modern missiles from Ukraine to Russia can only be done technically and in terms of personnel with the help of NATO in this case, so NATO would be a participant in the war ... thats the point!
@@HEMA-NRW You bee souper smarrt to lisssten to Pootin, anyone can access the satellite data lots of companies sell it. Pootin talks out his backside Ivan
Because Ukraine does not have the capability to acquire targets deep inside Russia.
It will take NATO satellites, intelligence and personnel to program these long range missiles to hit targets in Russia.
The ramifications of that are really dangerous for everybody on the face of this earth
all your hair has come and gone, unfortunately your brain cells never developed
Points well taken. Completely agree.
Russia said a war with Ukraine would be over in 3 days, not everything is easy. And both us and them, would all die.
no they didn't... *we said that* specifically General Mark Milley told lawmakers that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours if a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine
This is nonsense. It is impossible for him to lose a war against NATO in 3 days.
He would definitely lose, but it would take MONTHS for the logistics to get all the men and materiel in place to counter him.
Wow! A force that could not defeat the Talibans in 20 years, would defeat Russia in 3 days!!!
COMMON SENSE PREVAILS
Against NATO? Russia wouldn't last 24 hours.
Не смеши. Ничего вы не можете лузеры
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ😂 Russia’s more useless than Haiti
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щyou lot can’t even take Kyiv. Bit embarrassing. Meanwhile Putin and his oligarchs continue to rob Russia dry - again a bit embarrassing 😮
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ - lol at everything Russian Ivan - 💙💙🍁💛💛
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ Russia is a joke. A more or less bankrupt third world country! 😂