USMLE Step 1 Linkage Disequilibrium

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Everything you need to know about linkage disequilibrium for the USMLE Step 1. You will learn about alleles, chromosome loci (plural for locus), and how gene proximity can make all the difference.
    Stress less. Study smarter. Crush Step 1.
    Come watch the rest of our biochemistry library at physeo.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 107

  • @madryden5
    @madryden5 5 років тому +48

    You've made a frustrating question much more understandable - thank you.

  • @arushiarora706
    @arushiarora706 5 років тому +89

    Awesome explaination. It deserves to be shared to maximum people

    • @physeo-USMLE
      @physeo-USMLE  5 років тому +5

      We're glad you like it! Don't forget to tell your friends and classmates!

  • @dantitoprrito
    @dantitoprrito 4 роки тому +23

    Oh man, this is the best video out there. I have been reading the same 3 pages of the book for at least 2 hours and I couldn't understand a thing. I watch your 7 min video and now it's all clear. Thank you so much!

  • @TheMedStudentNotes
    @TheMedStudentNotes 2 місяці тому

    I’ve struggled to understand this for long and you cleared it up so tactfully. Thankyou so much.

  • @michaelfaraday8391
    @michaelfaraday8391 3 роки тому

    My first time commenting on an academic video. I simply say thank you!!!

  • @burns1606
    @burns1606 3 роки тому +1

    finally someone explains and I could understand linkage disequilibrium thank you!!

  • @FreeDay997
    @FreeDay997 4 роки тому +1

    You man are a genius, never understood it in the lecture, but now I do, thx!

  • @andreeanicoletacrintea3089
    @andreeanicoletacrintea3089 3 роки тому +7

    This was an amazing simple explanation. Are there any videos in which we could have a clear view on how LD is important in GWAS and provide a clear understanding on how to interpret the haplotype blocks? Many thanks!

  • @yashashwineerai4112
    @yashashwineerai4112 4 роки тому +1

    That was an amazingly clear explanation for a topic I got stuck at understanding from papers! Thank you!

  • @fabianfloresrivero6855
    @fabianfloresrivero6855 Рік тому

    I am very grateful for your explanation. I spent all day trying to understand this and it was made very easy with your video.
    Really thank you very much!

  • @NikhilRatnaNeuro
    @NikhilRatnaNeuro 4 роки тому +1

    Highly appreciate the attempt. I think I have a legit question.
    1)If the alleles are far apart, they behave as if they are on diff chromosomes, and recombine the maximum, giving rise to 0.25:0.25:0.25:0.25 frequencies for the 4 combinations (AB,Ab,Ba,ab).
    2) if they are very proximate to each other they are almost 100% linked which gives us increased rate of AB, ab, max of 0.5.
    3) If their distance is neither far nor too close, then recombination can happen few times and ratios of AB, ab will be less than 0.5 but more than 0.25.
    case 1 is linkage equilibrium . case 2 and 3 are disequilibriums (in both cases the frequency is more than the case 1. what is the scenario that the frequency could be less than 0.25?
    Now the linkage disequilibrium definition says, it could more or less often than expected by chance alone (randomness). how can it be less often 0.25?
    by the time I typed the above, I realised it could be new mutation incidence.. am I right? or missing something?

    • @carmineceraolo5610
      @carmineceraolo5610 4 роки тому +1

      I just tried to think about something that could make cause the frequencies to be less than 0.25. The only thing that comes up to my mind is chromatin structure. If two genes are divided by a region rich in euchromatin than I think it is more likely for crossing-over to occur in that region. This could possibly make conservation (i.e co-occurence) of the two genes less likely than 0.25. Is it clear? What do you think about it?

    • @CsprsSassyHrly
      @CsprsSassyHrly 4 роки тому

      Maybe selfish elements that suppress one allele over the other? Or rapid population expansion that introduce new variants into the population?

  • @nina-cr5pe
    @nina-cr5pe 4 роки тому +1

    i rewatched this part of my lecture 5 times and still didn't get it, with this video i understood within 3 minutes. thank you!

  • @tal1989
    @tal1989 Рік тому

    sublime explanation, was really struggling with this when it came up in the extended phenotype

  • @dinelkananayakkara3317
    @dinelkananayakkara3317 2 роки тому +2

    Awesome video! So intuitive and helpful. Thank you!

  • @normadicn5700
    @normadicn5700 4 роки тому

    So Linkage Analysis involves the analysis of basically linkage of Chromosomes during division.
    Now first each set of Chr should be heterozygous for each trait at a foci.
    Under Linkage analysis you can observe Linkage equilibrium which means the Alleles on the SAME Chromosome would still have characteristics of Independent Assortment as long as they are far away.
    Linkage disequilibrium means when the frequency of a combination occuring is higher than that which we would get by chance.
    That's what i learnt

  • @gideonokyeremensah6647
    @gideonokyeremensah6647 4 роки тому

    The explanation given in this video is great. Thank you very much.

  • @thankyou6555
    @thankyou6555 2 роки тому

    I must say this is an outstanding explanation! Thank you.

  • @ellora5535
    @ellora5535 2 роки тому

    Thank you this was the best explanation of all the vedios i watched

  • @afsana3505
    @afsana3505 2 роки тому

    Wow it's just fantastic vedio now i got this concept .Thank u so much sir

  • @CamilaLuizaDelaix
    @CamilaLuizaDelaix 4 роки тому

    i can't believe is THIS easy! thank you!

  • @swatijain2223
    @swatijain2223 3 роки тому

    Wowww, you explain this difficult concept in very easy manner so big thank you to make this video and helps student to understand genetics.

  • @lerazurig
    @lerazurig 4 роки тому +2

    Great explanation! It was super helpful. Thanks!

  • @alpr1864
    @alpr1864 4 роки тому +1

    That is good to have a great explanation of what its explanation is hard to explain. :))))

  • @krishnendukundu6446
    @krishnendukundu6446 4 роки тому

    This vdo help me a lot.. thank u for clearing my concept

  • @anjubiswas03
    @anjubiswas03 2 роки тому

    Thanks a ton!!! I was looking for this clarification for a long time. Finally, I found it! Thank you for making the video.

  • @JTCC20
    @JTCC20 Рік тому

    sweet, clear and concise. Good video!

  • @qasimhashmi7512
    @qasimhashmi7512 5 років тому +4

    amazing man (y)
    i was so confused with this thing. Cheers :)

  • @mostafanabil2005
    @mostafanabil2005 5 років тому +2

    It is now crystal clear,thank you

  • @wernerdykstra7021
    @wernerdykstra7021 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks! I finally get it!

  • @dessertisland2491
    @dessertisland2491 4 роки тому +2

    Great video, I finally understood the whole thing! Thank you so much!
    I was wondering - you keep saying that this or that occurs whenever "two allels" are close or far apart on a chromosome. Wouldn´t it be more correct to say that "two genes" are close or far apart?

    • @physeo-USMLE
      @physeo-USMLE  4 роки тому +3

      Hey! You are right that they could also be referred to as genes. That said, they can also be referred to as alleles too, because the diagram is showing 2 genes and 4 alleles. To keep it simple, we were referring to each letter as an allele. The letter "A" and "a" are the same gene, but different alleles, while "A" and "B" are different genes, however, "A" and "B" are also considered different alleles for a different gene. Hopefully that provides some clarity!

  • @starsadmirer1724
    @starsadmirer1724 4 роки тому +1

    thank you so much, very informative and helpful♥

  • @janiranavarro
    @janiranavarro 3 роки тому

    It makes total sense now! Thank you!

  • @dc33333
    @dc33333 5 років тому +1

    excellent speaker!!! Thank You

  • @gizemkok7954
    @gizemkok7954 3 роки тому

    Amazing description! Thank you!

  • @zhassulanzhaniyazov3830
    @zhassulanzhaniyazov3830 5 років тому +1

    Very good explanation, really liked it.

  • @birenchaudhary7637
    @birenchaudhary7637 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you. And Wouldn't it be also called linkage equilibrium if two alleles are on the separate chromosome? UW has given example of equilibrium as on seprate chromosome.

  • @yea2100
    @yea2100 3 роки тому

    This helped me so much ! Thank you.

  • @bann9437
    @bann9437 10 місяців тому

    thank you sooo much, i finally understand this !!!!!!!!!

  • @grace8694
    @grace8694 3 роки тому

    you are a life saver!!! omg!! thank you 😩

  • @KendallKnaus
    @KendallKnaus Рік тому

    Thank you- wonderful cleat explanation-

  • @IbironkeOtusile
    @IbironkeOtusile 4 роки тому

    God bless you for this! 🙏🏾

  • @nikolaoslinaroudis215
    @nikolaoslinaroudis215 5 років тому

    Very nice and clean explanation,thanks a lot!

  • @chandrikarajpurohit8856
    @chandrikarajpurohit8856 5 років тому +1

    Awesome sir.....too good

  • @Astute_Classes
    @Astute_Classes Рік тому

    Absolutely fantastic

  • @belaliamelouka9613
    @belaliamelouka9613 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir Allah bless you 💙

  • @ccdj35
    @ccdj35 3 роки тому

    Great explanation, thanks.

  • @ajayhemanth
    @ajayhemanth 5 років тому

    Brilliant Explanation Mate !!!

  • @paulaolivellaanido6157
    @paulaolivellaanido6157 4 роки тому

    In minute 1:41 he says that A represents a gene, and B represents another gene, but then when talking about linkage equilibrium A and B are referred to as aleles. I'm not sure I'm understanding correctly the difference between the two.

  • @jared394
    @jared394 Рік тому

    amazing explanation

  • @chrish7805
    @chrish7805 4 роки тому

    At (1:42 seconds) you say that A's represent a gene (with big A being one allele and little a being another allele of that gene) and B's represent another gene (again with its corresponding alleles). But then later in the video you use A and B to represents alleles (3:40 seconds). Not sure if i'm the only one that saw this or if I am missing something but it confused me a bit.
    So from my understanding when talking about linkage we are talking about two genes and how they are inherited. With linkage disequilibirum we have the alleles for two different genes in close enough proximity that they are essentially inherited together the vast majority of the time and do not follow the typical independent assortment (where the inheritance of two genes are independent of each other). Is this correct? Thanks in advance!

    • @mdmonoarhossain8616
      @mdmonoarhossain8616 2 місяці тому

      I do agree with you. This question comes to my mind also. Actually those two alleles are the allele of two different genes.

  • @anthonykerbage
    @anthonykerbage 5 років тому +1

    Thank you this is awesome!

  • @LiamDurkin-kf2rr
    @LiamDurkin-kf2rr Рік тому

    make a playlist fpr genetics

  • @Happy.Traveller
    @Happy.Traveller 3 роки тому

    Hi, I'm still confused and I wonder if you can help.
    The example at 2:44 says that allele A occurs 50% of the time and the other 50% of the time, allele B occurs, "what is the chance of having A AND B".
    If we pretend A is brown hair and B is brown eyes, what the example is saying is (at least the way I understand it) half the people have brown eyes and half the people have brown hair.
    This statement is a problem since having a certain hair color doesn't automatically decide the eye color. Saying half the people have brown hair (A) doesn't tell you their eye color, and saying half the people have brown eyes also don't tell you their hair color. No matter what hair color they have, they must also have an eye color and vice versa. Therefore the question about AB makes no sense to me.
    Should it not therefore be "Big A dominant brown hair occurs 50% of the time and little a recessive blond hair occurs 50% of the time, what is the expected frequency of getting Aa?" (and since A is dominant while a is recessive, the phenotype would be brown hair)?
    Also linkage [dis]equilibrium is counterintuitive to me: if 'linkage' means "on the same chromosome" and 'equilibrium' means "constant or same": then if 2 alleles are close together like at 6:09, then they are more likely to be inherited together since there are less chances of them being separated while undergoing recombination. Since they are more likely to be"constantly" inherited together, I'd assume this means they are at linkage equilibrium.

  • @ajithamohan6956
    @ajithamohan6956 4 роки тому

    Based on allele frequency, whether, We can calculate haplotype frequency??

  • @rizapaolahawkeye
    @rizapaolahawkeye 4 роки тому

    So, the linkage disequilibrium is the reason for distorted segregation ????

  • @sumanshisingh3127
    @sumanshisingh3127 4 роки тому

    Perfect and succinct! Thank you :)

  • @muhannadak8087
    @muhannadak8087 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you sooooooooooo muuch.

  • @ishanibose4351
    @ishanibose4351 4 роки тому

    Thank you. This is very helpful :))

  • @abdulrazakalmarashli367
    @abdulrazakalmarashli367 5 років тому +1

    You are awesome!

  • @dywu12
    @dywu12 3 роки тому

    quick question: do the chromosomes "break" twice (I mean on two places) when linkage disquilibrium occurs? The two pictures showing Ab and aB für LD suggests this, or could it also be that there is a small "blue A part" and a much bigger "pink b part"? thx

  • @sheikhahmad6178
    @sheikhahmad6178 Рік тому

    Thanku so much❤️💖

  • @Pierre.parisot97
    @Pierre.parisot97 4 роки тому

    I don't understand why there are 4 chromatids in the beginning and 2 chromatids when you explain linkage equilibrium?

    • @CsprsSassyHrly
      @CsprsSassyHrly 4 роки тому

      If I'm right, I think he's trying to say the alleles are more likely to be in linkage disequilibrium when they're on the same chromosome, whereas if they're on different chromosomes, they're going to be in linkage equilibrium. However, I do believe that LD can occur even if alleles are on different chromosomes.

  • @bounaimwanissa9708
    @bounaimwanissa9708 3 роки тому

    omg im gonna cry i finally understand it

  • @akashsalaria9683
    @akashsalaria9683 4 роки тому

    Just amazing

  • @justiniancruz6314
    @justiniancruz6314 5 років тому

    Brilliant!!! Thankyou so much

  • @xElinnee
    @xElinnee 4 роки тому

    thank you lord

  • @kakashibnl7984
    @kakashibnl7984 3 роки тому

    I'd ve loved if you spoke just a liiiil bit slower haha (non native eng speaker ^) ,, still helped me a ton tyvm

  • @yasmeennasr637
    @yasmeennasr637 3 роки тому

    Thankyou

  • @kristenhale3022
    @kristenhale3022 4 роки тому

    thank you!

  • @soumitrashome1642
    @soumitrashome1642 3 роки тому

    Awesome. Wow

  • @meadhikari
    @meadhikari 3 роки тому

    excellent

  • @nats379
    @nats379 5 років тому

    What is the reference used for this video? Thanks!

    • @physeo-USMLE
      @physeo-USMLE  5 років тому +3

      Hey! We referenced a whole bunch of different sources to bring this all together so that it would be as cohesive and seamless as possible. We hope you like it!

  • @zainabqaysar4668
    @zainabqaysar4668 5 років тому

    Bless you

  • @YamaKabiri-py3zv
    @YamaKabiri-py3zv 4 місяці тому

    Greatest

  • @romanaahmadmir4417
    @romanaahmadmir4417 5 років тому

    Thank you !!

  • @tisaloewen7051
    @tisaloewen7051 4 роки тому

    AH okay so: Linkage: 2 alleles on same chromosome regardless of the power of that bond....... when that link is weak and they can be swapped with another chromosome through crossover, that is link eq. ----- when that bone is strong because they are close and they are likely to stay together that is link DISeq. Finally! cool. ty.

  • @mustafaanlylmaz7258
    @mustafaanlylmaz7258 2 роки тому

    enlightining

  • @spiceup4100
    @spiceup4100 3 роки тому

    I have subscribed you...

  • @fires146
    @fires146 5 років тому

    When you state that “linkage equilibrium refers to alleles that are found on the same chromosome” don’t you actually mean genes?

    • @physeo-USMLE
      @physeo-USMLE  5 років тому +4

      Hey! You are right that they could also be referred to as genes. That said, they can also be referred to as alleles too, because the diagram is showing 2 genes and 4 alleles. To keep it simple, we were referring to each letter as an allele. The letter "A" and "a" are the same gene, but different alleles, while "A" and "B" are different genes, however, "A" and "B" are also considered different alleles for a different gene. Hopefully that provides some clarity!

    • @NikhilRatnaNeuro
      @NikhilRatnaNeuro 4 роки тому

      @@physeo-USMLE good explanation. So what are we referring to here when we call allelic frequency, essentially of 2 diff genes? where as when in the context of Hardy Weinberg law it is of same gene?

  • @pointeprincess302
    @pointeprincess302 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for this. I hate genetics lol

  • @pickaxingoneuropa8457
    @pickaxingoneuropa8457 3 роки тому

    Linkage Disequilibrium is Linkage KISSequilibrium- the alleles are toooooooo close! ya Feel me saaaaaawn?! Mnemonics for life. Live the Dream. (Terms and Conditions apply, dreams aren't for everyone, mnemonics may cause tooth decay, and headaches, Tom Cruise tried to eat his baby's placenta, hashtage kisseekisseedisseedissee)

  • @camilanicole3254
    @camilanicole3254 2 роки тому

    Legend

  • @tayabsoomro
    @tayabsoomro 2 роки тому

    To be more accurate, 1:54 shouldn't you have said "because each of the GENES are on different chromosomes", instead of "...because each of the ALLELES are on different chromosomes"?

  • @69Arj69
    @69Arj69 5 років тому +2

    linkage disequilibrium starts at 5:15 !

  • @azz9007
    @azz9007 4 роки тому

    i love this. so clear

  • @azz9007
    @azz9007 4 роки тому

    i have a question, that percentages were based on population right? for example in linkage disequillibrium, 49% of population tested, will have AB spermatid, and then just 1% of population will have aB... am i right?

  • @salmatarfaya3359
    @salmatarfaya3359 Рік тому

    You've made a frustrating question much more understandable - thank you.

  • @lehuang1924
    @lehuang1924 4 роки тому

    Thanks! I finally get it!

  • @ASAR0711
    @ASAR0711 4 роки тому

    thankyou