SpaceX Booster 10 Boostback and Descent: Simulation Multicam!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 тра 2024
- This simulation was rendered by TheSpaceEngineer - / mcrs987 - in collaboration with Emlyn - / emlynspace .
Check out the in-depth simulation: • Starship Booster 10 De...
For usage inquiries please contact us at RGVaerialPhotography@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon to gain access to full quality flyover galleries, round-table analysis and more!: / rgvaerial paypal.me/rgvaerialteam
We are now doing weekly aerial flyovers depending on the support that we get. Our cost range from pilot fees to rental fees of the Cessna 172 that is used for the flyovers over the sites.
Come join our Discord! / discord - Наука та технологія
The flip and boost back is simply the coolest thing ever
Thanks, hopefully flight attempt 4 will do a bit better.
awe man.thank you so much for this! It's so exciting to see the development of this massive ship / booster! Let's go SpaceX!!
jJust a totaly awesom video, thank you RGV!!!
Amazing presentation... thank you! Last few seconds are intensive, next flight will be much better! Can't wait!!! Go SpaceX 🚀
Thank you for your hard work
Phantastic Visualisation, thanks very much ! 👍🚀
That's amazing🎉
Thanks. I hadn't had a chance to look at that carefully.
Booster got just nailed by wind shear upon penetrating the first cloud layer. I'll be very interested to see how that goes on IFT4 and subsequent flights.
To reduce the amount propellant needed for booster to land, it should fall horizontally and then make belly flop maneuver.
Let's hope that IFT-4 will have a good slpashdown
Well done guys. Congrats 👏
Well made RGV! Also, at T+ 6:30 on the stream, when B10 moves its grid fin you can see the Max Q plume when it is descending.
Edit: for this video it is around 3:50, just below the grid fin when it moves
I'm not seeing anything
@@bryanillenberg you have to look closely m, hard to see but one you do you can de with easily. Blends in
Wow that was a pencil dive. Good to know it held up as good as it did. A return to launch site entry won't be nearly as violent as this
Looks like the engines were starved of fuel because of slouching due to erratic rolling and pitching of booster probably due to turbulent supersonic airflow around booster
You can see the *unfinished* boostback burn here
I would imagine that the boost back burn would be much longer to get back to launch site for a catch? Or the launch trajectory would be more vertical?
looking at the lost attitude control of the booster it seems happening just after the booster passes through the higher level of clouds like something stops working after that event 🧐
If this was done in blender you need to increase your min view distance to remove the artifacting on the booster
Shows how close they actually were
everything that happened in that decent, its almost like it lost a gridfin or one of them failed to control. the others all started to try and correct things, but were fighting the failed one. of course we dont have any info from spaceX on the position of each gridfin on the views, but it felt like they started to control things, one failed, the others tried to correct, they fired up some of the engines, but at that point it was too far gone.
👍
Cool, i thought that a dozen or so engines shutdown prematurely from being starved of propellant due to possible flow issues (and gravity), but based upon this it seems that isn't true becuase the bottom raptors shut down first....? interesting
My theory is the mapped it wrong. If the bottom raptors stayed lit the whole booster would’ve flipped alot faster
Has there been any word on the unsubstantiated claim that the hot staging ring came partially undocked and began to flap about, leading to the instability before RUD?
As of now that theory is entirely baseless with no such evidence. I can almost guarantee you if that were to have happened it would be visually evident in the real footage,
I have never heard of this theory, but it is 100% incorrect
@@bryanillenberg It was an obscure comment on X that this person knew someone inside SpaceX that could corroborate the information. I haven't heard anything, so I thought I would follow up. Thanks for the confirmation.
For a sec I thought it was COVID booster 10
noooooo the Z fighting in the tank walls :(
why are there so many bot comments?!?
Mauricio's got some simps 😂
Unfortunately this just happens every time we upload a new video. Having to manually filter them out
Sorry , I just can't get carried away with a booster tumbling wildly into the sea while the starship is yawing out of apparent control. SpaceX's "test through RUD" is fine for their own enterprises - but the Artemis project is depending on this system and it does not appear to be nowhere near reliable yet.
NASA knew they were buying not just another rocket or lander, but a whole lot of next generation technology. They also knew they were buying SpaceX's approach, the "test through RUD." At this point, Starship is as successful as any other non-SpaceX rocket: First stage delivered the upper stage to desired altitude and then ended up in the ocean. Second stage achieved the desired ~orbit and then reentered, partially burning up in the atmosphere with the rest ending up in the ocean. If the second stage had a fairing a payload clearly would've been deployed. Same success criteria as Atlas II and Atlas V. But moving on...
Yes, SpaceX has promised much more than a conventional launcher. But to achieve this level of success with this large a rocket in this amount of time is extraordinary. It took F9 several attempts to nail the landing - but the tests were mostly free because delivering the payload was the mission, landing it was gravy. That's how it'll work with Starship. Every launch of Starlinks can be considered a development flight for NASA, at no cost to NASA. SpaceX has a lot of experience with landing algorithms, it's fair to think they can master the booster landing quickly - and it doesn't have to be on the next try.
Iterative testing led to the extremely reliable and profitable F9 and Falcon Heavy.
Only issue is the constant babble of gibberish from the talking head. Not something that needs narration, or 'live' description by a bobble head. Such inane bla bla bla has ruined so many great car chases, car races, horse races... pretty much any event where an idiot with a mic is forced to describe what we can CLEARLY SEE. (great animations, as always but wow, those voices ruin the experience)