I've watched all of your videos ever since I found you about 2 weeks ago. These shorts to remind me of your final grade/opinions are top shelf, please keep 'em comin!
@@rosca9 it’s the exact same math. Some systems ETG WONT let you play because “there’s not enough risk”. But there’s no fundamental difference between live dealer or ETG
Hi Jack! I like the coverage on the felt as there are only 6 whacks. I would use this system to get in for a quick profit and then get out! Great analysis! Robert
Here is a better one, bet both zeros and 32 numbers. 5 per number will give you a profit of 10. If you want a bigger win reduce the bet numbers, higher risk higher reward. My original strategy, you are welcome.
not sure if this is the best place to ask but would it be better to bet the 1245 square and the 2356 square two more whacks but there is a 5ish% chance to jackpot on the 2 and 5 while keeping the rest of the board mostly positive
You can increase your probability of winning if you change the covered number or uncovered numbers. Personally, I try to leave recent hits or cold numbers uncovered.
Wow people are saying great coverage, which I have won and lost on Romanosky, but are forgetting the horrible success rate compared to other methods. 56% is almost 1 to 1 odds. The risk and reward coupled with success rate is awful. ❤ your stuff man
I played this system and its actually really good but i think after 5 spins should not play only because the ball tends to hit the only you arent playing after 6 hits
I like 1 minute reviews ❤I don’t like the risk reward for this one though. The best way to play this is get in for 3 wins and get out. But that’s only $30 win. So I give it a D+ 😂
Thanks for this video. You mention the gain of $10.00 but the recovery is bad return at just $10.00. What system do you reccomend for greater returns? Great videos ty from the UK Single zero city.
I used this system last week made $250 with it in over 1 and half hours. I made my own system now which switches up when you loose and double down when you win. So you basically don't loose large amounts towards the end.
You should just do five double streets... You only have eight wax and you win one unit. Percentages way better and you don't have to bet but 50 bucks instead of 80 to win 10 you bet 50 to win 10 with only two additional wacks.
Very risky system for so little return. If you get lucky in the beginning and get on a run then you can cash out ahead, but if you get whacked early you are done, you will never get back.
I’m a very sure footed person German and Engineer always want a safe bet but it’s never the best option for advancing your winning. They you wife shows up and wants your Meager winnings
I don't understand why you can't just do this. Then add to the 0/00 and do a lambert 1 unit bet increase on it until roll spin 34. This way you would only have 4 numbers that lose and a jackpot pay out on 0/00 if it comes.
My local casino bubble roulette literally wouldn't let me place this bet. It read on the screen something like Bet Not Valid Too Little Risk. I literally couldn't believe it. And no this isn't a joke , this literally happened.
I've watched all of your videos ever since I found you about 2 weeks ago.
These shorts to remind me of your final grade/opinions are top shelf, please keep 'em comin!
Pros and Cons: Con = the win is low for the bet, Pro = very low risk of getting whacked. Best for live dealer NOT electronic roulette machine.
why not electronic? is it not the same thing at those tables at the casino or do you mean online
@@rosca9 it’s the exact same math. Some systems ETG WONT let you play because “there’s not enough risk”. But there’s no fundamental difference between live dealer or ETG
Hi Jack! I like the coverage on the felt as there are only 6 whacks. I would use this system to get in for a quick profit and then get out! Great analysis! Robert
Another great video! I would use it for 1 or 2 spins to try and get that quick unit but I would use a different bet for recovery if it failed.
Here is a better one, bet both zeros and 32 numbers. 5 per number will give you a profit of 10. If you want a bigger win reduce the bet numbers, higher risk higher reward. My original strategy, you are welcome.
not sure if this is the best place to ask but would it be better to bet the 1245 square and the 2356 square two more whacks but there is a 5ish% chance to jackpot on the 2 and 5 while keeping the rest of the board mostly positive
That’s a system that I would prefer over this one.
You can increase your probability of winning if you change the covered number or uncovered numbers. Personally, I try to leave recent hits or cold numbers uncovered.
Good for 4-5 spins. Recover using dozens or columns OR add 2 column bets on top of this.
I agree. The Romanovsky has a 12.5% return. It’s a flat bet. Do 3 spins max and then get out.
I'm not sure if electronic/mechanical rowlette will let you cover that many numbers. Looks good though, I'll check it out. Tnx.
Wow people are saying great coverage, which I have won and lost on Romanosky, but are forgetting the horrible success rate compared to other methods. 56% is almost 1 to 1 odds. The risk and reward coupled with success rate is awful.
❤ your stuff man
Is it bad if I only bet on red or black?
I am new to your channel. What is your number one winning strategy 🤔? Thanks
Keep your money in your wallet
@twiz1084 I think you are right ✅️. It seems every strategy fails in the long run. The game is really unbeatable.
a lot of casino small bet machines don't allow this bet. They limit total board coverage some reason. Idk why.
❤ from india
I played this system and its actually really good but i think after 5 spins should not play only because the ball tends to hit the only you arent playing after 6 hits
I like 1 minute reviews ❤I don’t like the risk reward for this one though. The best way to play this is get in for 3 wins and get out. But that’s only $30 win. So I give it a D+ 😂
I don't know why CEG calls it Romanovsky when it's actually Romanosky with no v.
Thanks for this video. You mention the gain of $10.00 but the recovery is bad return at just $10.00. What system do you reccomend for greater returns? Great videos ty from the UK Single zero city.
Each time you lose, you have to in 8 consecutive times to cover your loss..
I used this system last week made $250 with it in over 1 and half hours.
I made my own system now which switches up when you loose and double down when you win. So you basically don't loose large amounts towards the end.
At most I bet 3 to win 1. 8 to win 1 is not good. I appreciate the % of possibility to double your buy-in....it's telling.
What's your go to strategy/system?
@@AlixD0829Baccarat
You should just do five double streets... You only have eight wax and you win one unit. Percentages way better and you don't have to bet but 50 bucks instead of 80 to win 10 you bet 50 to win 10 with only two additional wacks.
Very risky system for so little return. If you get lucky in the beginning and get on a run then you can cash out ahead, but if you get whacked early you are done, you will never get back.
I’m a very sure footed person German and Engineer always want a safe bet but it’s never the best option for advancing your winning. They you wife shows up and wants your Meager winnings
BLOOOOWSS
U have to be so DISCIPLED. U CAN'T be betting on everything
I don't understand why you can't just do this. Then add to the 0/00 and do a lambert 1 unit bet increase on it until roll spin 34. This way you would only have 4 numbers that lose and a jackpot pay out on 0/00 if it comes.
Romanovsky is not good ,once u lose one bet on a zero e.g. u will never recover
Why does this guy have to repeat what CEG school already shared ? COPYCAT DUDE
My local casino bubble roulette literally wouldn't let me place this bet. It read on the screen something like Bet Not Valid Too Little Risk. I literally couldn't believe it. And no this isn't a joke , this literally happened.
Do half the bet on one machine, and half on another for the same spin
An 86.5% coverage on a single 0 table is at least a solid "B"...😎
What other systems are there with higher coverage of the wheel?