A-Level Psychology (AQA): Minority Influence
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 сер 2024
- Social influence lesson 9. Covers the role of consistency, commitment and flexibility in minority influence.
Also covers Moscovici's Blue-green slide study; a 6 mark outline; 4 evaluation points and some exam questions.
Ideal for first time learning and for revision.
![Minority influence & social change - Social influence [ A Level Psychology ]](/img/n.gif)
This was honestly the most helpful video! Thanks a lot for taking the time to make this.
You’re very welcome
thank you, amazing video!
The 6 mark outlines are really helpful
Thank you. This video was helpful!!!
For the 6 Mark outline you showed for the AO1, does this apply to a 16 marker as well. I.e. if it were to say "Outline and evaluate research into minority influence" could I write about either the theory or the study or should I aim to include both? (and for a "discuss" question is it the same as well?) Thank you
Yep it applies.
If you get asked to outline and evaluate “research”, it means theory or study. If the question specifically asks about “research study”, then you have to talk about a study.
I donyt understand about not repeating yourself. do you mean when writing 16 mark essay if i outline i c ant use the study as evaluation?
How is minority influence different form social change and how do the link together? I find it hard to keep them separate.
Minority influence is a general process that influences people, just like conformity or obedience. Social change is something that happens in the world and it is influenced by the processes like minority influence and conformity.
So when you see minority influence in the social change topic, you are using a general process (minority influence) to explain a real world phenomenon.
Does that make sense?
@@smcartledge2723 That helps a lot, thank you.
Hi, so if i do the AO1 and NOT mention Moscovici, is it okay if all my AO3 is just Moscovici ? eg:
1. Research support by Moscovici
2. Meta analysis to support moscovici and provides support for consistency,
3. however, Moscovici biased sample cant tell us much about MI in other genders,
4. Artificial task
I wouldn’t advise doing that because you run the risk of not actually evaluating research into minority influence, but rather just evaluating 1 PIECE of research.
So research support and a counter is fine. But then use something else as well, like support for deeper processing, just to mix it up a bit.
so useful thankyou
You're welcome!
Do you need to know about social change processes in the new advanced info ?
No. Just Minority influence including reference to consistency, commitment and flexibility.