Sabre Jet Engine test run 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
  • The Orenda 14 engine for a Sabre 6 has been in the shop for almost three years. The entire restoration process has been documented on the Patreon account. This is a compilation of clips from the two days of run in, calibration, adjustment, and performance testing.
    The engine worked perfectly and it will soon be flying again.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 72

  • @grahamj9101
    @grahamj9101 Місяць тому +4

    Congratulations on a successful engine test, AgentJayZ! It means that I can now conclude an entry on my CPD (Continuing Professional Development) record, which I've carried over from one year to the next.
    To maintain my professional registration in the UK, even in retirement, I am required to maintain a CPD record. My comments and contributions to your channel, along with my STEM and other activities, all count towards this.
    Many thanks!

  • @mlsatke
    @mlsatke Місяць тому +5

    Some time back I saw the video where you mentioned the idiots who used your footage to proclaim that jet engines don't use fuel. I was amazed that anyone could be that stupid. I happened to see the referenced video and was further appalled by the total ignorance of that content provider.
    I commented at the time that anyone who believed his claims should be prevented from driving, voting or breeding.
    Thankyou for your content.

  • @_Joy_Unleashed
    @_Joy_Unleashed Місяць тому +4

    If I learned anything it's that test runs aren't cheap!

  • @gcrauwels941
    @gcrauwels941 Місяць тому +4

    Love that rut dug out behind the test stand. _Tim Allen grunt_

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +6

      Jet wash gulley used to be jet wash alley.

  • @ozratman
    @ozratman Місяць тому +2

    The exhaust field grass and woods look lovely this time of year.

  • @LungsMcGee
    @LungsMcGee Місяць тому +3

    Every time I look at jet wash alley I imagine the whole shed coming loose and disappearing into the wild blue yonder😂

  • @micstonemic696stone
    @micstonemic696stone Місяць тому +3

    It is nice to see you in charge of a cell start,
    I have not seen that one before,
    It was
    I enjoyed the robot throttle level's sound,
    I think it runs smooth,
    Success but you knew that as you make them
    You are a man to see
    Nice

  • @richardlincoln8438
    @richardlincoln8438 Місяць тому +2

    As always, interesting and informative.
    Thank You Sir. Best Wishes to You and Your Family.

  • @ChildSpaceMethod
    @ChildSpaceMethod Місяць тому +2

    Sorry to hear about your 'tard problems. The videos are great, with your infectious enthusiasm for rebuilding these engines, and today, putting them through their paces. You take such care in explaining how your babies operate, your procedures, your opinions. I enjoy watching, tho I don't have a jet engine, or even a turbocharger.

  • @IstasPumaNevada
    @IstasPumaNevada Місяць тому +2

    Wikipedia says the difference between empty weight and gross weight of a Sabre 6 is 4000 pounds, specifically for "internal fuel" (with Max Take-Off Weight 3000 pounds above gross). If jet fuel is 6.7 pounds a gallon that's about 600 gallons, assuming ALL that 4000 pounds is fuel. Of course they could presumably add drop tanks for an airshow and just not drop them.

  • @gordondenzler8721
    @gordondenzler8721 Місяць тому +1

    Happy to see it run

  • @ganzeytyler
    @ganzeytyler Місяць тому +3

    forgive me, as i have not watched ALL of your videos(yet) but i had a question, How many man hours dos it take to perform a full disassembly/inspection/overhaul on a turbine engine? i would image this can vary wildly from engine to engine, so ill let you pick which one if you would be so kind as to answer. thanks.

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +4

      This one was in as-stored condition after decades of storage, and was restored to flying condition.
      3200 hours, parts and testing extra.

  • @Mike-lh1rq
    @Mike-lh1rq Місяць тому +9

    It's great to see someone's keeping these old engines alive. I was always fascinated that you managed to get one of the very few orenda Iroquois engines in existence. What's the status of that engine? Do you have all the parts for the engine?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +8

      This engine is an addition to the population of powerplants for the Sabre.
      The Iroquois project has been dormant for the last ten years, but I hope the owner renews his interest in restoring it.

    • @Mike-lh1rq
      @Mike-lh1rq Місяць тому +1

      ​@@AgentJayZare there many Sabre engines left? I thought you owned the Iroquois engine when you traded a bunch of World War II English aircraft parts for the Iroquois that was in the UK at the time? Is that not the case? Is the engine complete or is it missing a lot of parts

  • @Kargoneth
    @Kargoneth Місяць тому +1

    Beautiful machine.

  • @F-Man
    @F-Man Місяць тому +4

    Question:
    When the engine is spooling down after shutdown, does that cause problems with wear on bearings and such with the engine still spinning and oil pressure being low, or is there an auxiliary system to keep oil pressure up until the engine is actually stopped?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +6

      Oil pressure is nothing more than an indication of the resistance to flow of oil... getting to where it does its job. The roller bearings in this engine will be fine on wind down even if their oil supply is totally stopped. It's not though. as long as the engine is turning, the pumps are pumping oil.

    • @F-Man
      @F-Man Місяць тому +3

      @@AgentJayZThanks!
      I don’t know much about the finer points of gas turbine engines like this beast - always cool to learn more about how they do their thing.

    • @CdH94
      @CdH94 Місяць тому +2

      You're everywhere, man.

  • @MemorialRifleRange
    @MemorialRifleRange Місяць тому +2

    How Wonderful!!!

  • @grahamj9101
    @grahamj9101 Місяць тому +4

    You don't seem to have been bothered recently by the "jet fuel is a hoax" brigade, AgentJayZ - and I haven't had a run in with any of them lately either. Why don't they realise that, if it was all a gigantic hoax, it would have been blown wide open (by their compressed air theory!) long since?
    As you know from my comments in the past, I take it very personally, having been involved in combustion design during my career.

  • @stevea9604
    @stevea9604 17 днів тому +1

    Turning Jet A into noise & fun 👍🏻😁😎

  • @MitchJ
    @MitchJ Місяць тому +5

    What was that electro-magnetic sound coming from the engine during your close up as it was spooling down to zero?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +6

      That is a sound made by the fuel pumps at extremely low rpm.

    • @ksbs2036
      @ksbs2036 Місяць тому +1

      Nice video Agent JayZ! Do you use a fresh batch/fill of lubricating oil for each engine you run in the test cell, or can you re-use it? Your videos really make me appreciate how much development effort has gone into the design and your efforts in rebuilding these amazing machines. Nice!

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +7

      We always start with new oil, and when finished with it, we save it for things like the hydraulic test bench and the air dyno. That oil is over 30 bucks per litre (actually a quart).

  • @TeemarkConvair
    @TeemarkConvair Місяць тому +2

    nice to see your years of toil run; so, startup,, sure seemed to "hang" at 20% for a LONG time, then the video had a cut and all was well, what was that about?,, the power band really is so small,,tickling 7k at mil but a few percent lower and thrust drops WAY down. thanks for this, Jay

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +2

      Very good eye. Start cart power was shut down a few seconds early, and it took a nudge of throttle to get the engine up to 38%, which is ground idle.

  • @bodan1196
    @bodan1196 Місяць тому +2

    In the footage the thrust was displayed as not particularly stable. Is that _nai_ ("normal as is"), or an artifact from the "thrust measuring devices"?

  • @D95SI420
    @D95SI420 Місяць тому +1

    yay a new vid already

  • @jonsingle1614
    @jonsingle1614 Місяць тому +5

    What kind of oil does it use...and how much ?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +4

      Synthetic gas turbine engine oil. We use Eastman 2380 or Mobil Jet 2. Max consumption is 1.5 pints per hour.

  • @JasperFromMS
    @JasperFromMS Місяць тому +2

    I'm curious. Would the engine be expected to develop the same thrust when installed in the aircraft? It has that nice, big bellmouth on the stand, but the aircraft would be moving through clean air in flight. Would any of that make a difference?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +2

      Yes. The bellmouth is designed to remedy the loss of inlet flow due to the aircraft not moving.

    • @JasperFromMS
      @JasperFromMS Місяць тому +1

      @@AgentJayZ thank you, sir!

    • @CharlesVanNoland
      @CharlesVanNoland Місяць тому +2

      Read my mind. This is something I've always wondered over the last several years. The engine no longer has to suck as much air when it's moving into it, does that affect efficiency? Max thrust? I was literally going to ask the same question while watching this until I saw you asked it already :]

    • @grahamj9101
      @grahamj9101 Місяць тому +2

      Installation losses are a fact of life. That was the speciality of one of my retired colleagues, who will be one of the little gang of R-R retirees (aka The Escape Committee) meeting up in a couple of hours time.
      There are bound to be pressure losses in a typical aircraft installation, which may have a significant length of of intake duct, as compared to a bellmouth intake. This will obviously be the case with when the aircraft is stationary at the end of the runway and even into flight. However, at high speed, the intake ram effect will tend to negate the intake losses, if not more than compensate for them.

  • @K_Hansen
    @K_Hansen Місяць тому +3

    that would blow the snow off the drive for sure

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +3

      Yes, that is what first came to mind on this 85 F day.

    • @sethjensen54
      @sethjensen54 Місяць тому

      @@AgentJayZI see you speak sarcasm

    • @stevea9604
      @stevea9604 17 днів тому

      The Russians developed one for snow removal…There is even one to de-ice train snow removal plows after their runs…

  • @reedjacksonmaccom
    @reedjacksonmaccom Місяць тому +2

    I know this engine is old and I know its very powerful. Its very noisy…. which I think is neat. But aren’t these engines dis allowed in anything but say airshow applications. As in, isn’t there a restriction on engines noise and it increasing advances towards less noisy and less noisy? And so, do you know who will apply this engine to a project?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +4

      Who? Have a look at the community this engine will live in. My video for you is about Oshkosh, and it's called Warbird Jets.
      ua-cam.com/video/TXUWhD1H-v8/v-deo.htmlsi=_Z-JqPlXwDtqQ3PX

  • @vrendus522
    @vrendus522 Місяць тому +2

    Awesome and amazing. You're the Michael Jackson sex machine of jet engines. You know your trade well and plan your moon walks backwards. Thanks so much for the technos, you know how to make the arduous look happy and understandable. Appreciate your efforts. Dan USA :)

  • @markdavis2475
    @markdavis2475 Місяць тому

    Great to see it in action. Nice ceramic coating on the blades! I saw the EGT didn't change much; I assume it wasn't connected?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +1

      You were looking at the wrong gauge.

  • @AIM54A
    @AIM54A Місяць тому +2

    Geez if I could get a jet engine to run without fuel I'd be rich making free electricity.

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +3

      I've mentioned that to them. They have no response.

  • @jimwells4240
    @jimwells4240 29 днів тому +2

    Gawd....what happened to that poor inlet spike?....looks like it got run over by a truck.

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  28 днів тому +3

      That's the way it's supposed to look.
      Have a look at my vid: Orenda 14 in the Sabre... made a long time ago.

  • @markdavis2475
    @markdavis2475 Місяць тому

    Hopefully, this is not a silly question, but when you refer to Gallons of fuel, is it US Gallons? I prefer litres myself, but the conversion is easy.

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому +2

      I talk gallons for my majority US viewers. I think in litres, so I often forget their are two different sixed gallons.

  • @ferozahammed197
    @ferozahammed197 Місяць тому

    I'm a fallowr of ur videos... watching #GUNTUR city ..from INDIA 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @indepviewpt
    @indepviewpt Місяць тому

    Units EGT?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому

      F

    • @larrybremer4930
      @larrybremer4930 Місяць тому

      I was wondering that too, maybe a percentage of Tmax or 1/10th of degrees F (ex: 70 = 700F)? Since from what I read in a search a typical EGT ranges from 600F to 1000F I guess you could say either of my answers would look correct.

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому

      You are looking at the wrong gauge. Explained in the video.
      My first response was incorrect. I'll fix that now.

    • @indepviewpt
      @indepviewpt Місяць тому

      @@AgentJayZ the reading was 70. Nobody looking at the screen during the test?

    • @AgentJayZ
      @AgentJayZ  Місяць тому

      My mistake. We've tested two Orendas in less than a week, both with different instrumentation. This engine was using the aircraft readout in degrees C.
      When using the computer screen, the units are degrees F.
      Sorry about the mistake.