The beginning of the universe, for beginners - Tom Whyntie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- View full lesson: ed.ted.com/les...
How did the universe begin -- and how is it expanding? CERN physicist Tom Whyntie shows how cosmologists and particle physicists explore these questions by replicating the heat, energy, and activity of the first few seconds of our universe, from right after the Big Bang.
Lesson by Tom Whyntie, animation by Hornet Inc.
For some reason I was expecting something like "Our whole universe was in a hot dense state" for intro
Penny- Hi Sheldon 😂
Ugh....I'll be long dead before anyone knows the origin of our universe. Dammit!!!
Jesse G ha ha
there is no answer to the question why does anything exist
Islam is just a bad copy of judaism and christianity, its a militaristic religion that was designed to subjugate people and force them to believe said religion without giving any thought for it being wrong. Oh also if you don't believe well kill the infidels right, oh and if you don't like your wife's attitude then beat her cuz u know why not...
It is this mentality why only 3 muslim scientists have won a nobel prize for science and 2 of those were for chemistry.
joe shmoe exactly 👌🏼
My teacher is making me watch this
Same.
same.
Same
@@jocelynguzman8644 Wtf. That's not funny at all 🤦♀️
@@jocelynguzman8644 "Girk" Check your Grammar boo
why do people take the time to watch a video about the big bang then brag in the comments that god created everything
Lol what if God made the Big Bang.. And it is also good to know stuff even if you don't believe in them .
+cameron eerf nope
Well, as a Muslim, I believe that the Big Bang happened, I also believe in God. Science explains how, religion explains why. Science describes the paintbrush. Religion describes the Painter. The 2 don't contradict.
However, if someone is gonna watch just to deny the Big Bang in the comments, that irritates me as much as bigots who insult Islam in the comment section of Islamic videos, or criticize Jon Stewart in Daily show clips.
But then again, the comment section puzzles even the most qualified psychologists (probably not true, but you know what I mean)
comb528491 science and religion are very different. neither can be involved with eachother,
cameron eerf I beg to differ. My own grandfather was a professor of physics who had helped discover Pions when he was getting his Ph.D at the University of Bristol, for which his supervisor won the Nobel Prize. He was also a very devout Muslim.
We watched a bunch of TEDed videos in science class today, and everyone seemed to enjoy them. Great work, and thank you!
What class where you in? I mean what was your approximate age?
For people who want to know more:
It wasn't the fact that the universe was really hot that atoms couldn't form, it was the high energy photons, known as Gamma rays, which would collide with the electron and 'knock' it out of the orbit around the nucleus, and the photons would hit the gluon, which is the gauge boson for the strong nuclear force responsible for holding atoms together.
now how do i put this in to a paragraph for school
@@extremeh4yzey copy and paste it into grammarly, then word tune
I wish our classes were this long
😂😂😂
Thanks to my teacher, I was forced to watch this Video. Luckily, I like the channel itself so thanks TED-Ed for helping my school-day better.
Who came to this from their online classes?
Continued...since it's almost beyond question that the universe had a beginning (including the beginning of time, space, matter and energy), only something (or someone) timeless (eternal), immaterial (spiritual) and not limited spatially, could create it.
Exactly. Same that so many Christians actively reject logic when the Bible itself says that wisdom is God's handmaid.
We don't know that the universe began to exist. The Big Bang theory is not a theory about the creation of the universe. It begins with space-time, matter, and energy already in existence, and does not explain where they came from.
That is an assumption of epic proportions. You can only speculate about the nature of those questions. Science does, however, have an possible answer which doesn’t require the untestable and extreneous solution of a creator. They call it “quantum fluctuations” which caused a region to basically blow up and inflate at a crazy rate.
@@thebeast5215 And what causes those? (Remember, nothing can only do nothing.)
@@claudeleblanc4707 bbut bro we don't know? tis a fundamental thing the casmir effects proves ite xists quantum mehcanics whcih is one of two theories of the universe that literally work for every observation it does exiest it happens not everything has an answer and you can't fabricate answers based off of your beleifs you gotta prove that first
This video made me feel like I am a small kid, learning about universe!
Wow, I do so regret reading the comments on this video.
Same here mate. Just took a bit of a deep dive and I fully have my regrets rn.
There so depressing
These kind of animated videos help me greatly understand concepts like this because of my Astrophobia.
I've been pondering, and would like feedback. It is reasonable to suggest that in order for something to be a cause to a subsequent effect there needs to exist the medium/dimension of time. So if time only started/came into existence when the big bang occurred and did not exist 'before' the big bang then it would be reasonable to draw the conclusion that the cause, the big bang, does not itself require a cause, (a prior cause is not even possible) given the absence of time, as the cause-effect dynamic was only set into motion once the big bang occurred. Since our cognition can only exist and operate in a cause-effect reality would it then be reasonable to say that we are destined to grapple with the origin of the universe for eternity as no explanation our mind can create will ever be compatible with the events that occurred those 13.8 billion years ago?
Shannon Laing I’m sad no one has given you any feedback.
I agree that we are wired to think in terms of cause/effect. I agree that the c/e relationship can only exist in time. Therefore, we will eternally grapple with this question as you so eloquently stated.
In short: yes. Brilliant.
I’ll check back in 3 years to see if someone else leaves feedback.
@@brettjohnson6374 yeah, its outside of human's understanding. we want answer that we want to hear but neglect to believe.
@Seneca Weiss Thank you I have seen it :). I have read brief history of time subsequently.
There are questions we will never have the answers for.
The universe itself started at the big bang. Why should our logic apply for anything before it?
@@shmerox7683 Because it is fundamental.
Lemaitre identified the expanding universe in a paper two years before Hubble published his work. Lemaitre is also the originator of the idea now known as the Big Bang, a derisive appellation coined by Fred Hoyle nearly two decades later.
Underrated dude
THIS!
Why do people who believe in the non-sense of divine creation even watch this? Like you are just here to say science is wrong and that there aren't any facts supporting the theory, but you don't offer any evidence of divine creation or anything. So, if you are not open minded and willing to understand a different point of view, stop wasting your time and commenting trying to change the opinions of others who don't think like you. I wanted to read interesting comments with more info about this or something and they're outnumbered by your useless comments.
I'm much more concerned with what was BEFORE the big bang. "Nothing" isn't an acceptable answer to me. There had to be something. And there had to be something before that. And before that. Forever. But, we know that's impossible. But, it's also impossible for existence to begin without having something or somewhere to form within. The same thing applies to the universe being "infinite". Because for it to keep expanding, it has to have something to expand into. And whatever space is contained within, must also have something to be contained within, and so on and so on. Again, that's impossible. But, it's also impossible for it not to be to the case. No matter what way you look at it, what is going on is impossible to understand.
The only real answer to these questions is, that we don't know. And we will likely never know. Because our stupid, little, human minds aren't capable of grasping it in all likely hood.
The truth of what's going on in the universe is something that we're not even capable of imagining or understanding.
Theoretical physicists say that space and time are not two different things, but they are two expressions of one thing, spacetime. The Big Bang was the point when spacetime was created, so before it, time didn't exist. It's very difficult for the human brain to try and comprehend that, but time isn't something that has always existed, always isn't something that has always existed and neither is forever. Basically, time began and it will end, it has it's own timeline. There was no "before The Big Bang".
Carolina S. but there is evidence that science didnt create it. because for the very first thing to exist. something must create it. science didnt create itself. a higher being done this. no im not a church goer but just saying some sort of higher magical being did iy
Carolina S. and because no one was born idiot that's why people study the nature of universe. so you think you are an idiot because you think it's non sense???
Clint Sherman, Here goes that famous question... what created the creator? I'm quoting your comment, "because for the very first thing to exist, something must create it". But I don't agree with you, Nothing can exist since forever, so it has to be created by itself at some point. And if magical being existed before everything else, and some day it just came to existence, isn't that way too complex to just pop out of nothing? Its contradictory
0:35: probably a good thing. BRO IT CREATED LIFE
well id say thats an extremely bad thing that resulted in all of humanitys problems
If we used beginning as is, beginning will become a general concept on its own and it would be treated as a measurement. It occurs everywhere and the beginning of the universe could be at any point considering there's no such thing as time.
Okay.
Luke 21:25 - "There will be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars…”
Gen. 1:14-15 - "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as SIGNS to mark seasons and days and years"
Daniel 1:20 - "In every matter of wisdom and understanding about which the king questioned them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and enchanters (& court astrologers, see 2:27) in his whole kingdom."
By tradition, Solomon did.
I really hope one day everybody will have enthusiasm on the great fields of science.
all i know is when i listen to the signs that the universe reveals, everything is well.
Thanks for the video, keep them coming and maybe one day we can all be half as smart as you guys
*Who else is here during the lockdown*
Quahntasy - Animating Universe my teacher forced me to watch this
These facts allow us to deduce something god-like:
1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore the universe had a cause for its existence.
4. Whatever caused it to exist had to be outside of time, space, and matter.
5. Therefore the cause of the universe was timeless, spaceless, immaterial, and powerful. (Pretty close to God as traditionally understood)
All these premises are more likely to be true than false. Because of that, I find this argument convincing.
Tell me what you think. Which premiss do you deny and why do you think that this premiss is MOST LIKELY false rather than true?
It’s the KCA. Has been refuted already.
www.religiouseducation.co.uk/school/alevel/philosophy/cosmological/Kalam_rebuttal.htm
Also this video:
m.ua-cam.com/video/P28hy8JRYUk/v-deo.html
They pretty much sum up what is the general consensus of the skeptic community thinks, including myself.
Awful refutation of the kalam. I think Dr. Wlc already addressed this in a video "objections so bad I couldn't have made it better myself" 🙂
@@marcgoce4020 would you mind explaining why they are bad?
You didn’t mention the Belgian priest cosmologist who actually discovered the Big Bang.
Yup. Goerges Lemaître invented it. But i guess they ignore the fact?
@@shook_mug3786 very speculative to assume that they purposely didn’t admit it. It’s a well known fact that a Jesuit priest was one of the first to recognize that “there was a day without a yesterday”. However, religious people love to negate the overwhelming observational evidence of the Big Bang, and choose their own hypothesis’ which lack major evidence.
@@shook_mug3786 using edward hubbles observation?
how does that matter he literally used edwuard hubbles observations
@@thebeast5215 goerges made his theory before Edward Hubble. And you completely undermine it by just saying he thought of a day before yesterday or some bull, you say it as if his theory was nothing but a sentence. So anyway get your facts straight. In fact Einstein denied Goerges cosmic egg theory (which wasn’t simple) until Einstein saw that it made a great deal of sense and changed his mind. And what religious person denies the Big Bang? I have not met any, and even if they did were you there in the beginning? In fact the big bang actually aligns with a lot of religions because it postulates that there was a beginning so silly what am I talking to a 15 year old? I think it’s because you don’t like that it was a person who was a Christian that bothers you it eats you and I love it.
7JT gang where u at
yo
As a kid I was told that if I went through a locked doorway in our old house, I'd fall off the third floor and crash down below in the rock-paved patio. I believed that, even though I had no evidence for believing that. Then one day when I was older and more skeptical, I found the key and unlocked the door. It lead to an empty room. Why was it locked, and would I die if I went in there? It was a mystery that quickly went to solve. Yes, I became and still am a scientist and proud of it. Cheers!
"Super" in this instance is best interpreted as "beyond" nature, as in "beyond" or "outside of" the universe. It doesn't necessarily mean everything we think of as God, but it has to have many of his traits, such as being incredibly powerful, intelligent, and creative.
1:07, but it was more like a big ass stretch. Not an explosion
Mr. Midnight yup
Cosmic Inflation sounds more accurate
Excellent explanation, mainly the part that explains the early universe and the connection of high energy in the behavior of the particules. Now, i understand how function the LHC.
LHC?
@@aureliano_37 Large Hadron Collider
Most universe talk is confusion and complicated. But no one will NEVER know the EXACT Full truth of our organization today.
If your watching this in 2021 your a legend
I believe I was "created" to be curious...and I really appreciate this explanation...well done!
3:10 He Got Us
How did this fun little science video become a target for Christian apologists?
This is a great little animated primer on the big bang theory and it would be extremely nice if it was shown to all school children. Give them a little information like this and kids will naturally want to dig deeper and learn more. Fantastic job TEDEducation.
It really still isn't enough for me. I'm pretty sure things made a lot more sense that way, but who's to say we couldn't come up with a better theory in modern times?
I want to teach my 4 year old about the big bang... Does anyone know if there is a video out there with MUCH simpler terms involved?
Read the kid the bible and explain about the bible
+THE LONELY SPONGE Im pretty sure he's trying to explaing the *real* *world* to his daughter/son not the delusions of a bunch of goat herders thousands of years ago.
@@inkoalawetrust 😬
Most people, when you ask them, will say that they don't know how the big bang started. How did anything do something to make such an explosion. At the begging of time there was only matter and anti-matter, and when anti-matter and matter collide they create an explosion that is strong as an atomic bomb and that is why the big bang started, because they collided with each other. Now you may ask where did that mater come from? Most of you learned that mater can't be created nor destroyed, so that must mean that mater has always been there, it was never created.
Serious question: How did the matter and antimatter "collide" without time? The big bang was the beginning of time, after all
sorry to say this but you are an idiot. How do you think the big bang happened?? An explosion 100 trillion times stronger than any nuclear bomb just started out of thin air ? I'm not quite good at physics or at explosions or at chemistry but I am 10000% and anyone reading this that it is impossible for something to explode without anything happening...
Dzoni UF thank you. It was energy.
That is how teacher teach, and the question of the test are:
1. Where that infinitely small amd infinitely hot dot came from?
2. And what caused it to exploded?
3. If it infinitely hot, it must be had infinite entrophy, so how come thermonynamics said resultant of entrophy always positive?
4. Is the dot explode in the space or the explosion create the space?
5. And how the space that contain the dot created?
6. If in milsecond quarks was too hot to bound together, the space between quarks must be big, but how it came frome infinitely small dot?
8. Why there wasnt any infinitely small and infinitely hot dot randomly appear again some where and creating another universe?
i understand you brother. I respect what you believe. My only problem on some people is that they don't know how to respect others belief. BTW i don't recommend or fight that we are right. I just only want is to be respected by others.
The Question was where did the matter for the big bang come from?
Exactly! This is something I want to know so bad!!!
I thought matter can't exist yet that time(milliseconds-seconds) because it was still too hot ?
ok i assume that god created everything but who created god?
He's the creator. He cant be created.
@@shook_mug3786 but if God is self created by universe then why we can't be self created and no god exist
@@infinity6678 bc we have the creator who makes us
Asking why and how everything is the way it is, is pretty much the ultimate question that you could ever tackle in this reality that we live in. You would have to nearly master and understand everything in this universe before you can tackle that ultimate question and prove it.
So I wouldn't expect a proven 100% answer for 1000s if not millions of years.
The beginning is the end, and the end is the new beginning.Endless cycle. Need to learn to break this cycle. 🙏🔥
Video: The beginning of the universe, *for BEGINNERS*
me: I've seen any of these videos but I still don't completely understand, new school is tough.
Edit: I could cry into my notebook right now.
How a boom in a house can make the house better after explode ?
It surely doesn't, so?
I'm detecting high facepalm levels of fallacy and flawed reasoning in your question's intention.
I'm gonna risk it and touch it with a pole...
Your analogy is incorrect, you should remove the house for the analogy to be correct.
There's no house, there was no material, suddenly a highly concentrated ball of energy came into existence and "expanded" in an instant, then it slowed and cold down, materials were formed with the energy and pretty sure some "bricks" ended on top of other "bricks".
So your logic is, explosions are usually related to attacks, so all explosions are bad.
Racists have used the same logic as you for years!
Also The big bang was not a bang it was more like a big expansion.
giorgiomx hehe like your style ;-)
Behold; an argument condenser, takes a shitty arguments on UA-cam and shrinks it into a simple, easy-to-understand argument. We need more of these guys.
The facts are not twisted, they are just facts, as verified by objective scientific process.
0+0+0= CAN NOT EVER GIVE YOU 1 !! So from where the Big Bang came from?
Some says god
+Mg5 Gaming Which is believed by Christians*
There's a big difference between truth and belief.
+Marius what if there is a truth 2000years + ago and people still searching like idiots? Evrything stands of beliveing, do you wanna belive a gitlfriend,friends ,scientists ,media,bible, evrything is based on beliving but... there are lies its up to you to discover them not to stand on same place whole life and wait for answers and having "close minded" opinion :)
Jure Matković I love how you try to sound open minded but you just seem like a pasive agressive moron wondering why no one knows about OUR HOLI LURD AND SAVOR JESUS RICE!
It is basic Algebra.
0 = 0
If I instead write it like this:
+1+-1 =0
It still is true.
Imagine 0 is the infinite void of nothingness before the big bang.
Let's also say that "+1" is the big bang.
Finally, the big crunch is the "-1" in the equation.
It all checks out, unike your IQ, pleb.
Fr. Georges Lemaitre's paper about the origin of the universe came 2 years before the discovery of Hubble
Oops! I made the mistake of typing the word "gluon". Replace the word gluon with "nucleon" in my last comment. Sorry about that. Also, regardless if the nucleon's mass is increased (using the Higgs Boson) CERN would still need more energy for this collision because of the increase in mass in the first place. As a massive object approaches light speed, it takes on more mass. This is why colliding massive particles at higher speeds yields the creation of more "stuff". More mass=more stuff created.
I'm literally having chills...
What if endless quantum fluctuations were trapped inside a singularity - a point of critical mass that built up through an almost infinite amount of time forming the opposite of a black hole. Let's call it a reverse black hole. In this black hole, years passed as mere minutes were spent on what we observe now on earth. And instead of gravity sucking in mass, the black hole spat out matter like a string along with gravity generating our spacetime. That would explain why we observe the universe drifting further apart and the continuing expansion of the universe - we are still inside the gigantic cotton wool ball that keeps unwinding. Maybe the solution is all around us instead of behind us.
string theory
What if my auntie had nuts
"Creationism is a scientific view"
- Do you know about the scientific method? Obviously not - otherwise you wouldn't call creationism scientific!
"the Bible is a history book"
- No, it is a collection of stories made by men - often written many many years after the events were supposed to happen! Back to science - you are unable to prove it's a historical correct book. And if I may add... talking bushes, apples of wisdom, bat are birds, whales can swallow man-sized object *facepalms*
The second top rated comment is part of a FREAKING INTERNET FIGHT this man deserves more than that!
I love astrophysics, and subatomic physics, but this notion of building more colliders is either wasteful, a ploy for money, or inconsiderate of the better uses for billions of dollars. Not to mention the years of the best brains focussing on solving a problem. Maybe we can focus on ending global oppression of children and childhood poverty first? So that geniuses born to poor families won't be left without being put to the test of solving real issues? Then we can really build more giant overpriced science experiments?
Through the study of hard sciences, humans seek to improve our understanding of the natural world. Pursuit of hard sciences are, so to speak, 'playing the long game' in human endeavour, which we may not immediately see as beneficial to society, but are equally important and not a bit less real. The 'global oppression of children' and other sociological problems you might have had in mind won't simply be solved neither by funding the billions that would otherwise go into the scientific funding nor by focusing of scientific brains on the matters.
Kemar B.
Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Don't research science because there are poor kids that could use the money? Don't make me laugh! The amount of federal money spent on science (here in America) is ABSOLUTELY MINISCULE! The real waste is the American military budget. TRILLIONS of dollars are wasted. Warheads that are, most likely, never going to be used in the next 20 years cost the same as 13 college educations! Sorry pal, but science doesn't have any funds to spare, the military does.
Scientific endeavours, discoveries and inventions often improve the world and technology in ways which may help us eradicate poverty in the future.
I don't think you like subatomic physics as much as you claim.
The universe started when God said “ Let there be light.” Then there was light.
[citation needed]
Who made god
Omggggg I forgot about this comment this was back when I was a Christian I’m an atheist now
PLOT TWIST
there really never was an explosion
Coming out from complete dark , consciousness woke up ; and then there was light/ first sight/first thought/ first memory... of Man's mind/God's eyes
We call it today Bigbang /time space mortal life
the quest for truth isn't about being right or wrong, it's about the journey
Einstein concluded that the influence of gravity, as a force of attraction between an object with mass & other objects with mass, is a consequence of spacetime. So, when 2 or more objects that each have mass, are pulled toward each other; is the cause of the objects moving toward each other the result of spacetime between these objects being (for lack of better terms) "displaced"? I think that dark energy (the force responsible for the universe's expansion) is the opposite of gravity.
___________3.STATES THAT AFTER THE BIGBANG INFORMATION OF THE UNIVERSE NEVER STOPPED AND IS CONTINUOUSLY MAKING OTHER DIFFERENT UNIVERSES(multiverse)WICH COULD BE DIFFERENT OR SIMILAR IN OUR TERMS OR PHYSICAL LAWS.
Just like it has been done all over history.
Also God responds to faith. "Without faith it is impossible to please him, for he that comes to God must believe that he is, and he is a rewarder of those that diligently seek him".
As I understand the physics, "nothing" is unstable and immediately collapses into "something" or matter. An absolute vacuum cannot be sustained. Then there is the multiverse theory that is fascinating itself. Please, anyone that knows their physics and cosmology, correct me if I have misunderstood something here.
The simple act of calculating the intensity of these forces would've crushed your "Faith" to pieces. That's something kids do in elementary school physics in Europe.
Yay, Murica.
I'm glad you said "your" conclusions because that is what it is! Millions and millions don't agree with you.....same reasonings apply "you were not there".
Petty humans? In relation to what? We humans are of superior intellect and powers of reasoning and free will! This is why it is of significance to our creator.
Why should there be a universe with specific laws and rules "of Nature" that are conducive to the creation of life? ..and the support of life as well? WHY?
Why not the opposite?
We have limited characters here: 'work through' it is shorthand for... asking people who may (or may not) be experts (& spotting the difference): reading as much as you can, from as many sources as you can: becoming as informed as you can on a subject before coming to a conclusion... You get the idea?
The 2nd part of your post just described evolution brilliantly! It's the myriad of changes and influences that create something slightly different. Evolution doesn't only apply to biology.
good point, it's not really a theory, anyone can come up with a theory, but a hypothesis needs facts
Everything we humans experience in life has a beginning and an end that is hardwired into our brains and set in stone. So when we search for an explanation to the nature of the universe we are not looking with an open mind we are looking with a preconceived notion that at some point the universe must have started and at some point it must end we can not mentally grasp the concept of a universe with no begining
Knowing the truth and simply believing your parents/preacher are very different things.
aah~ bible study, and here i thought i was going to get the weekend off, ill be back in a bit.
1:23 How Comes that the Universe cold down?
Energy cannot disappear
Where all the heat went to?
Ido T am the heat can be spread evenly. If I have some large bread and I put 100 degrees of heat in one area that one area will be super hot, but if I spread the 100 degrees of heat evenly, each area will now have a lower temperature. Heat can be spread out so the concentration decreases.
That's like asking how does anything cool down? The heat dissipates
wind is caused by the air flowing from high pressure areas to low pressure areas, wind is simply air movement and we do have proof of air. just because you believe in god doesnt mean that you shouldnt believe in science too, in fact it could help you improve your ability to debate religion.
Absolute Nothing is the absence of anything including chaos. No laws, no nothing.
that video was very interesting and beautiful ending.
I wasn't arguing for or against the Big bang here, i was just telling you that your hip analogy is wrong. From all the scientific observation, experimentation and theories, Big bang is the best model for the origin of the universe. There are many others, but Big Bang the facts better than those.
had to go back and read it, he didnt break the world or even the tower, he simply scrambled theyer language, and they quit. its been implied that if humans saw god that they could die, sounds like an act of mercy to me.
You may choose to believe that there are no facts, but that would be a wrong belief. The facts you ask for are simply overwhelming in volume. UA-cam comment pages are not the place to seek deeper education in the sciences.
I'm honestly not trying to dodge here, there's just too much, in so many overlapping fields. I am awed every time I make the effort to learn things in science that are new to me. When I was a christian, I used to filter out the stuff in science that proved problematic.
Some guy made a big splash in the water though. Even if there is no out side account obviously someone made an argument good enough for millions of people throughout to give up their lives to prove a point.
1) Viruses reproduce at a rapid rate, the life span of a virus can be hundreds of years, but more likely than not, it's lifespan is around a few seconds to a few minutes. Since they reproduce so fast, viruses evolve incredibly fast.
2) Each human being isn't exactly alike. If we all had the EXACT same genetic code, then one outbreak could easily kill off our entire race. Since each human has a different genetic code, some are immune or more resistant to infections than others.
Well i am happy to know that you know so much:), and i hope you guys don't feel that i am trying to judge, i am just trying to explain, i have my own faults and sins i need to work on, but i would like to be corrected if i am wrong
Really good job!
Big bang suggest that universe emerge from single point and practicals moved away from it. Then certainly those galaxies which are near to big bang point should be younger than those which are far away. This mean there is a time gradient in formation of galaxies. Is it contradiction, suggest your view?
Can anybody tell me where that supposedly infinitely hot and infinitely small big bang came from. The second law of thermodynamics states that the universe left on its own will go to chaos,and if the universe is super old why don't we see transitional forms today?
This video is a science video. If you have a problem with that, go watch another video and stop spamming comments here. You can go watch videos about how God made the universe then and stop annoying people here.
We're all in this together!
No
@@PapiGuillen lmao
The law of thermodynamics says that creation is impossible.
Creation is an illusion of your human experience. Nothing can be created or destroyed, energy can only change forms.
We usually say that something was "created" when it has changed forms but it is not REALLY creation because creation is IMPOSSIBLE and the Universe is eternal and all the matter that exists in the universe is as old as the universe itself which is measured by when it changed forms during the big bang.
the scientific term "theory" is higher up than "law",
law is the base observation "objects will attract"
where as theory will delve into the reasoning behind it and why it occurs.
if the law stands up to the scrutinous testing and analysis it becomes theory,
so when i say gravity is a theory it means it's been tested and came out the other side.
Please give scriptures to support this for the non believers;)
what an informative video
Guys, This is atually a great video... we can all agree on that at least!
Honestly: We don't. People do say that we do, and, with the word faith, they do I haven't even finished and I can tell your the type of person that won't accept the "faith" answer (not intended to be a slam). The only way that I can explain it to you is like this:
Do your parents love you? Does your significant other love your? How do you know? They could have changed their minds between telling you and now.
It is true that things expand when heated. But the expansion of the universe is powered by the big bang's explosion itself.
In a frictionless environment, a thing in motion will remain in motion unless a force acts on it. In this case, gravity. One of the big questions is: How much mass is there in the universe? Is too little to overcome the initial explosion or more than enough to slow it down and eventually stop it and then pull back down into a Big Crunch?
He said every CREATION has a creator, not every CREATOR is a creation. The point obviously is that all intelligently designed creation points to a process in which an intelligent designer intelligent created His/Her/Its purposeful creations. However, the fact that we are seeking an explanation of origin causes us seek a creator that always was and thus began creation. Everything musnt have a beginning but every intelligently designed creation credits a creator with a purpose. Be intelligent
This argument implies there is a net matter of mass and energy.
Physicists have worked out that the total energy/mass of the universe is 0.
This means it's creation didn't actually make anything, or break the laws of physics
"Not even a universe! It's impossible!"
- You know this how?
For the umpteenth time....BECAUSE NOTHING COMES FROM NOTHING!!
"You can't answer why they exist at all!"
- Neither can you. You didn't even know what scientific method was!
Yes I did! And I'll say it again......they exist and was created for the benefit of "LIFE"!!
A material universe with no life......"Has no meaning"!! The existence of life is a precious gift of the creator! ....and also imparts glory to the Creator!
My definition of a miracle is 2 fold:
1. Something really cool that I didn't expect ( lets say scientist discovering a little serum that cures any sickness)
2. Something really cool happening (like a birth)
In the beginning this world was being alone, one only, without a second. Being thought to itself: May I be many; may I procreate. It produced fire...That which is the subtle essence-this whole world has that essence for its Self. That is the Truth. That is the Self. That art thou, Shvetaketu.
Also Like I just said at the very fundamental base is gravity being negative energy and mass being positive. They are types of stored energy. All energy can be converted from one type to anther.
What is important and relevant to the discussion is what there is evidence for.
Evidence of "the universe? Yes.
Evidence of a "creator"? No.