This Star Has a Black Hole Core and It’s HUGE
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Quasi-stars are so large and powerful that they hold a black hole within them.
WATCH ANOTHER VIDEO: Largest Star in the Universe is Stephenson 2-18
• Largest Star in the Un...
CHECK OUT OUR MERCH: www.cosmoknowl...
You are welcome to support us so we can create more quality content:
www.buymeacoff...
Join this channel to get access to the perks:
/ @cosmoknowledge
SUBSCRIBE ► goo.gl/PLLFPz
----
Website ► cosmoknowledge...
Instagram ► / itscosmoknowledge
Facebook ► / cosmoknowledge
TikTok ► / cosmoknowledge
Twitter ► / cosmoknowledge
Produced, directed, and edited by:
Ardit Bicaj
Narrated by:
Russell Archey
www.ravonmedia...
Graphics:
ESO/L. Calçada
NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI,
Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz),
Ben Johnson (CfA),
Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge),
Phill Cargile (CfA)
M. Kornmesser
ESA/Hubble
NCSA, A. Kritsuk, M. Norman
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
Chris Smith (KBRwyle)
Music:
A Fool's Theme - Brian Bolger
Orchestralis - Suspenseful Pulsing
A big thank you to our lovely channel members:
Joseph Pacchetti
john roberts
Ali Rıza Şeren
Heywood Tate
Dave Jarrard
jaeyun tous les monde
Qing Li
No One
Iv Müller
Thomas Nathan
-
Cosmoknowledge brings news from space.
We love you, explorers!
Black hole sun
Won't you come
And wash away the rain?
Black hole sun
Won't you come
Won't you come
Won't you come
Good one ❤️
@@Cosmoknowledge congratulations! You have a song stuck in my head lol
@@tripleairgoddess yep
Already been published bro, good song!
🎶In my eyes. Indisposed. In disguises no one knows.🎶
👆the song pretty much sums up this bit of theoretical physics👆
I happen to be a musician🎶🎸who is a physics nerd🤓
This is all theoretical.....we haven't found any yet.....
a theory is a collection of facts that, when taken together, make unequivocal sense. the probability of them existing is greated than them not existing. the math is correct. read a science book or 12.
Idc is real
We haven't found any, because they're all believed to have died out long ago. But they explain how it's possible for such supermassive black holes to exist; the math says that black holes shouldn't even be ABLE to be that big, yet they're all over the place, especially at the centers of galaxies.
@thometheiousvladizar7044 By that logic anything is real without empirical proof if we theorise hard enough.
The problem with theorising is that it is predicated on assumptions which may later be proven to be wrong or never be proven at all.
Theoretical astrophysics is just that: theoretical. Too many people who claim to be followers of science like to treat the theoretical as The Truth. That's not how science works. It's a potential working theory until it is proven or a better theory comes along. And theoretical astrophysics has many theories which may never be proven empirically. Subjective probability calculations are not empirical evidence.
yeah you right ...
As if black holes couldn't get anymore incredible, you see they used to power Quasi-stars.
Black holes, the takers and bringers of life. 😄
@@CosmoknowledgeThere’s a theory that the space we live in, see, and surrounds us is the inside of a black hole that exists in another unobservable universe. So you’re not entirely wrong there 😅
@@Cosmoknowledgethe giving is better ..taking is sad ..
@@-LSC Well if you think about it, we exist inside Sagitarius' A acretion disk...
@@mistafo032 Time's still flowing
I like to think of quasars as being sort of the last remnants of these
Well actually a quasar might have formed from these objects. Scary monsters.
Our sun is huge by most stellar object standards. It is actually in the top 10% in size. Seriously, the fact that we call it a "yellow dwarf" is funny. In reality, it is a yellow giant (technically a green one even).
Well no, humans on the scale of life on earth are giant. You woulsnt call a dwarf a giant now because theres bil.ions of ants. Our sun is a yellow dwarf. As its small for its category/species
Green?
Imagine these monstrosities were still out there. ☠️
🔥
Impossible with significant metallicity - collapse of the star core would lead to outer layers being thrown away or falling into the black hole
@@vladtepes4526 Still, these days the biggest stars are said to have a black hole in the middle.
@@zenokarlsbach4292 Galaxies and sometimes star associations have black holes in their cores but not stars.
@vladtepes4526 It was a theory. So far, that's all I know.
Hmm. Are they similar to Thorne-Zytkow objects??? Imagine a star hosting a blackhole in its core but not collapsing entirely.
I think for it it's not even a star. It's just a blackhole wearing an enormous gas envelope. A true star has a core where nuclear reaction is taking place. That's not even a nuclear reaction.
Hi from the Philippines
Hi there! Kinda similar. TZOs have a neutron star core while Quasi-stars have a heavier core. A black hole. ✌️
Think about how large this thing was.
If its center coincided with the Sun's, its boundary would be OUTSIDE Pluto's orbit!
If a hypothetical particle started on the surface of this star and moved in any direction at the speed of light, it'd take 40.75 hours for it to get to its original position again. In comparison, it'd take this particle 0.13 milliseconds on Earth's surface - a difference of 1.1 million times.
Nice point of view.
Russell Archey is tnis your side hustle or has Ai stolen your voice? You're the best narrator anyway. Been a fan of Ewu crew since it had a female narrator before you took over
Keep up the good work mate
Cheers
Russell Archey narrates this channel too. And it's been almost 4 years now. Thanks for the kind words. Will pass them over to Russell.
@@Cosmoknowledge
Awesome..thanks for letting me know. I love true crime and astronomy so its a bonus
Amazing to hear. Cheers!!!
A stellar engine with massive power.
What I struggle with is that if nothing can escape a black hole, not even light and light is the fastest speed in the universe, than how can any energy be ejected from the black hole? It would be like a garden hose you hold vertically up and when the water comes out it falls back in because the water pressure isn't enough to overcome earth's gravity. Likewise any energy would fall back down into the blackhole due to gravity. So the only way that could occur is that the energy being ejected from the blackhole would have to be traveling at a speed greater than light.
Thank you for posting the video love from India♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
Of course. Thank you for the kind words. ❤️
There could be undiscovered stars that could be around lightyears in size i think, or we just have'nt discovered yet. What do you think?
Btw a great video!
Thank you ❤️
That would IMMEDIATELY collapse into a blackhole stars have a size limit
@@edb36mar But many sources say that the star would blow up becuz of high radiation pressure, and some say that it will collapse into a black hole. Which one is right? I think that it depends on the metallicity of the elements and some other factors.
@@edb36mar I don't think so but yes
@@JuPiTeR_0211 it depends on the stars core
Makes you wonder if Betelguese is one of these stars, maybe why its acting so weird.
To give an idea how big quasi-stars are, the sun compared to Stephenson 2-18 (the largest known star) is like a golf ball compared to the Epcot Center sphere, and Stephenson 2-18 compared to a quasi-star is like the Epcot Center sphere compared to Earth's moon. Also, the supernova of a quasi-star is truly mindblowing. The plasma jets from the poles are so big they dwarf this thing that in its red giant phase is so big it can fit 30 of Earth's solar system side by side comfortably inside of it. Then it collapses, forcefeeding the black hole millions of solar masses worth of matter while also part of it gets blown apart to form new stars. It's kind of ironic that the black hole that devours it is the only thing powerful enough to sustain it.
This universe is large enough to have them - if not, "it seems an awful waste of space"!
👍 video
Do you think we will ever have a telescope that will allow us to see the first couple of million years after the Big Bang?
Well, Webb can see a time a few hundred million years after the big bang. Future telescopes will surely keep getting better and better.
It's getting weird too.. The shape of the universe is harder to understand, when we see that far..
@Cosmoknowledge I thought once we get to a certain point you can't see any further because it's only how fast light can travel. So how could we see further? Or are we not at that point yet if that makes sense?
Why wouldn't there simply be an accretion disk?
That's because the pressure and density of thie gas surrounding quasi-stars are so high that they prevent the formation of an accretion disk. Instead, the gas directly feeds the black hole.
Science
This is completely irrelevant but I just ate the most amazing orange ever 🤤 🧡🧡
So quasi-stars existed at the center of a galaxy before becoming a super massive black hole?
It's more likely that the remnants of quasi-stars, black holes, likely migrated toward or formed in regions that would become the centers of protogalaxies. These early black holes then continued to grow and evolve into the supermassive black holes that are now central to galaxy formation and dynamics.
Thank You Cosmoknowledge. 📡🇺🇸
Thank you for posting the video. I'm impressed.
Glad you enjoyed it ❤️
@@Cosmoknowledge 👍
How does quasi star and a quasar differ?
Qasars are active and luminous galactic cores that shine from matter falling into supermassive black holes. On the other hand, Quasi-stars are hypothetical stars with a black hole at their centers, thought to have existed early in the universe.
@@Cosmoknowledge In my native language, the word for quasar roughly translates to "galaxy killer", really hitting home how unimaginably terrifying those things truly are.
Mad oooo
Do you ever feel embarrassed or ashamed, do you ever perform self checks, that all you offer is cartoons and cgi, that you have copied from the www? While sat in a box room staring at a screen, which is the furthest you can be from reality?
Omo
See sense.
Huh?????
It's magnificent, imploding and exploding at the same time and difference levels.
Yeahh ❤️
Mystery Recapped soundtrack!!!!!!
Thing is, the black hole core stars are not proven in any way, and possibly won't be in a really, really long time.
More powerful telescopes are gonna reveal a whole new universe.
Why can't you use both units of measurements...km/miles
Well, science universally uses the metric system, even in the U.S., for its precision and ease of use, ensuring seamless global collaboration and consistency in research. But I'm gonna try to include the imperial too.
OK - how is it theorized these "theoretical giants" start? Are born? How did they form in the first place?
Paul M.
Atlanta, GA
imagine if one comes near the solar system 💀
Luckily, we reside in a relatively quiet region of our galaxy.
Everyone has to conced all this is a assumption .mankind has never seen one even with our gigantic telescopes like hubble that can see way across the universe but regardless we have no 'Real" idea of their existence .it's crazy how we depend on computer simulations to gather data of something we aren't even sure they actually exist .
Это похоже , с одной стороны солнце , а с другой стороны черная дыра.втягивает в себя как воронка и выдает с другой стороны планеты как присованный комбикорм.вот на нем и размножилась жизнь в тепличных условиях.
Some of what was said doesn't make sense Black Holes are created when the internal pressure of the star gives way to the external pressure of the star this imbalance is initiated when the core of the star finally begins fusing elements into iron, the surrounding stellar material further compresses the core as the intense gravity of the iron core crushes the surrounding stellar material into an ultra dense state of matter commonly known as a singularity. There do exist "phantom stars" these are black holes surrounded by shells of ionized gas they emit light like stars but once you get close enough the gravity is much stronger than it should be for a "star" of it's size also the light that radiates from them will be dimmer than a star of that size should be.
The quasi-star could just be thought of as one of several ways which black holes accrete material around them.
The people who discovered it tried
Where does the fusion reaction happen? Is a normal star, the fusion is in the center. But that can’t happen here. Is it happening in the outer layers? Is there enough pressure?
They supposed to formed when the universe was just few million years after the birth og the universe
Early on in the universe definitely sounds plausible as there would be gas littered everywhere and bigger suns too.
talk about a rough 'parasitic' behaviour on a cosmic scale o0
Big giant orange 😂🍊
1:04 IS THAT SOLARSMASH
The black hole sun: UNLIMITED POWER wait we end? Dang
Can you guys stop saying gas and say plasma? 0:41
You're right, but the reason we use the term 'gas' instead of 'plasma' is because it's easier for people to understand. There are people who are still learning.
Hm, fascinating
Videolarında neden Türkçe altyazı seçeneği yok?
Unfortunately you are wrong...... we haven't found one
It's easy to imagine, really...the accretion disk is spherical and dispersed is all
Wow how this star have super huge core and diameter every star have different characteristics ❤❤❤😍😍😍
That's the beauty of the universe. ❤️
So, quasi-stars are a theoretical construct that only existed in the early universe?
He could tell us anything. How can you dispute it.
And how did they come up with this theory? What proof is there that a black hole in the center? Magnetism is a real force of pressure known as repulsion with pressure towards repulsion as unsynchronized flow. Force of repulsion to repulsion? No. Force of propulsion from repulsion. Yes. Cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion. Internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself as the weakest point of repulsion as neutralized repulsion within mass as outward force of repulsion within. Heat can't collapse in on itself as outward force of pressure. That is a physical property that is fact. External heat energy throughout space as a weak external magnetic field is directional momentum with minimum force of pressure to and from cold repulsion within and without entanglement of mass as maximum momentum velocity as external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy when entanglement with mass occurs. Distance traveling at maximum momentum velocity with the least amount of force as normal space itself. Physics works for pressure equalization as magnetism. Mass occupies space as a neutralized pressure of force within as outward force of pressure known as weightless outside of a greater internal magnetic field grounding currents through its nucleus or core like earth's internal magnetic field. Moving away distance increases and force of pressure decreases as distance increases as weight of currents flowing through mass towards the greater magnetic field. Mass is always outward force of pressure and doesn't collapse inward. Space is occupied by mass. Mass neutralizes cold repulsion within mass as occupational space itself as outward force of pressure known as heat energy propulsion outside and within entanglement as mass. Mass can only expand as occupational space. Physics works. Physical properties are necessary to maintain theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Magnetism bonding force and repulsion force is equalization of force of pressure within and without entanglement of mass as space itself as a weak external magnetic field. Heat is the lifeblood of everything. Heat is the only force universal and is everything and almost everywhere. The exception is a star explodes away all heat energy singularities outward force of pressure and leaves behind a void of pure cold repulsion devoid of heat energy singularities within as a monopole of pure repulsion to heat energy singularities to weak to penetrate the void and can only collect around the perimeter of absolute zero energy within as monopoles of pure repulsion of cold space. Physics works for magnetism. Force of pressure is always equalization to distance traveling cycling circulation. Normal space filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as maximum distance traveling and minimum force of pressure to and from propulsion momentum. What's put in motion stays in motion? Physics works for magnetism as scientific facts. Internal and external magnetic fields. The flip side of physics. Clockwise and counterclockwise. Alpha and Omega. Heat and cold. Ying and yang. Mass is both clockwise and counterclockwise pressure equalization. Magnetism is both cold repulsion to heat energy propulsion momentum from cold repulsion. What's put in motion stays in motion until acted upon by force. One force known as force of pressure within and without entanglement of mass. One universal force is heat propulsion as waves. One particular thing is a singularity of opposition as the only physical property known. Cold space itself is repulsion to heat propulsion singularities momentum. Anti matter is physics as force of pressure never touching. Mass occupies space as outward force of pressure known as neutralized repulsion within mass as the weakest point of repulsion. Opposition to one another is a force that has no definition other than anti matter. Matter is heat repulsion as anti matter. Internal magnetic fields grounding currents as liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity equalization of force of pressure flowing in synchronization sequence of pressure equalization as mass with incoming renewable heat energy singularities exchanging singularities in chain reactions equalization as grounding currents to itself and surrounding mass as heat absorption or heat refraction lighting up surrounding atmospheres by repulsion friction of unabsorbed heat energy singularities bouncing around atmospheres. Light is only present in resistance to mass. Mass doesn't always absorb more heat than it can cycle circulation patterns as internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself and surrounding mass as directional force of pressure known as weight as earth's internal magnetic redirected currents towards the center of Earth's internal magnetic field grounding currents is strongest at the core or nucleus. Hydrogen has the strongest internal magnetic field grounding currents through its nucleus or core. As mass expands distance cycling circulation increases and force of pressure decreases in equalization. Physics works well for magnetism as heat repulsion to refraction of light as heat waves striking atmospheres normally. Lightning is rapid heat loss as equalization to force of pressure released heat energy from disolving internal magnetic fields grounding currents as atmospheres gasses releasing external heat energy into the atmospheres. Lighting up surrounding areas of mass as unabsorbed heat singularities refraction of friction from unabsorbed heat energy outside of entanglement of mass. Hydrogen and oxygen sharing internal magnetism grounding currents as molecules from cold repulsion equalization. When it rains it pours. Oxygen and hydrogen sharing internal magnetism grounding currents in unequlization of pressure. Not enough heat energy grounding currents. So rain hits the ground as currents grounding themselves into earth's greater internal magnetic field. Lightning is rapid heat added to the atmosphere.
As a layman it seems counter intuitive, but then again, I'm not a scientist.
Another way to look at this is a black hole with an accretion *sphere*.
Nice video! Why is it always the small channels with high-quality content?
Oh, I appreciate the kind words. ❤️
Purely theoretical 5:45 at this point 👍
Actually it's a quasi star guys
What are you talking about?!, quasars are not stars at all!! it's not a star and a BH inside it! The huge BH inside any star will eat it in a tinny fraction of a time!
false. black holes are not lightning fast, all-consuming objects. maybe read a science book?
By Apollo, I swear! 😊 Go Ra! ❤ Gorgeous
How can you study something that you don't even know exists. It's just a theory.
U just answered your own question by asking it
Fun fact: Your belly button is your first mouth. Happy 4th of July!
Same to you!❤️
Isn't this just all speculation?
Nature’s Dyson Sphere 🤔
Dat is melting de boomgaard zon
Love the colorful, imaginative artist’s renditions
Thank you ❤️
1:03 solar smash
Uranus supposedly has a black hole as well
Oh, here we go.
Stop
Explore with ussssssss
What big bang?
pseudoscience
Fascinating
Did you know quasi stars are actually made in China
Wow I had no Idea 😎
Wow I had no Idea 😎
But why ?
I like this video its interestyng
Thank you so much!
Such BS
Sry for being mad at you
EWU
Knowledge my ass.
❤️
Fantasy level master.
Thank you ❤️
I knew JESUS wasn't real 😮
Jesus is real
He walked on earth
Not actually a black hole if light is able to escape.
Light can't escape only near a black hole. The light coming from these stars is far from the black hole itself.
@@CosmoknowledgeHow is the "energy" supposedly emitted by the bh (the energy fueling the quasi-star) to be understood? Are all black-holes supposed to emit (not merely absorb) energy?
Let's change the stars! What I mean is, get the IAU to, OFFICIALLY, make a new constellation. Figure it's time to put something up there relevant to us, don't you think? My idea for changing the stars is called, "Mickey," I mean, "THE ALL-STAR," and includes Orion, Taurus and Pleiades (Subaru). Ok, start at Orion's belt and "Betelgeuse" becomes the head with a baseball hat. The 3 stars of Orion's belt make up the 3 fat belt loops on a baseball uniform. Below the belt are two legs bending at the knee. "Saiph" is the back foot and "Rigel" is the front foot. The spear pointing at "Subaru/Pleiades" is the bat and "Subaru/Pleiades" is the baseball flying away after being hit. "Bellatrix" is the hand that let go and "Aldebaran" of Taurus is the bat's tip. Put it all together and you get, "THE ALL-STAR." In my case, I see a left-handed batter with a, "7," on the jersey. Which makes him, "Mickey." (As it should be) But it can be a righty or lefty with any number you want. Making, "THE ALL-STAR," any player you want and a perfect fit in our night sky. Pass it on, please and thank you. Don't worry, where I come from, crazy is a compliment. ;-P
God is great
Any technology superior to our own would be viewed as magic, and the beings who wield that technology would be looked upon as gods.
Open your mind to modern times and close the book of ancient myths.
The I is observing the I one true Self Dissolving I creation. All things created must be destroyed. The I is The "BLACK HOLE", Being the Master of the I creation. "Black Hole" is the I self Unmanifest creating in the duality, observing and mastering I creation, Then dissolving All that I have created. Hail Hail To I One True Pure Self Unmanifest. I Am That Has No Name. I Am That Can't Be Explained. All Is I.
I once had a chemistry professor in college say "Science is the gradual unfolding of a series of lies". We really know nothing
Finding Super giant or greater stars could lead to confirming Advanced life in the Universe. If scientist find a giant star that is billions of years old then it means a super civilization is behind the reason why such as star lasted that long.
Thanks for your feedback. ✌️
What makes you think that?