19:00 - That doesn't sound right. The phrase "climate change" was invented by scientists to dispel arguments like "if global warming is real, then why is it snowing in March?"; because "global warming" confuses simple people who think that it's a simple matter of the whole planet getting hotter and nothing else. "Climate change" encapsulates all kinds of climatic disruptions including late winters, early frosts, hurricanes, floods, etc. in addition to just desertification. - On a related note, the Obama administration specifically used the acronym ISIL instead of ISIS to avoid ruining the ancient name for everybody including the Egyptian goddess, a nail salon in New York, and a little girl, all of whom got flack because of the jerkorist group. Unfortunately the good intention didn't work because righties used that (possibly from Hanlon's razor 🤔) as a way to attack him for "being unable to even say their name". 🙄 🤦
You’re right! I did say “invented” but I meant “promoted” The term “climatic change” was first used to describe these changes in earth’s climate in 1975. That said, it wasn’t the most common or popular term. In fact, it was used alongside others like “inadvertent climate modification” and “global warming” (the latter made popular after a congressional hearing on the topic caused an explosion in climate coverage in the press). Not long after, Frank Luntz (a republican strategist) wrote a paper all about how republicans should be pro-environment and get “back to nature” but using the term global warming was too activating. He promoted and suggested climate change bc it was more wonky. Eventually, NASA and more dispassionate scientists prefer “global climate shift.” But either way, the spirit of the point I made in the video stands: the term is used to discourage people to act. web.archive.org/web/20150203081915/www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001330.php
Does anyone know what camera Trace uses? I’ve been watching a lot of his videos since the Tom Scott one this morning. This is definitely a 4K camera, but I’d love to know what camera/lens combo he uses
I'm so glad I found your channel. These videos are excellent. Your presentation is absolutely superb. And the references.. oh the references! (2001, The Fifth Element, Waterworld, Starcraft, etc.) I love it! Haha. 👍👍
I've heard that more and more people are being born without wisdom teeth and I wonder if that will continue in the future since they're mostly problematic in modern day. I also wonder if the rate of evolution for humans has slowed due to longer lifetimes, having children later in life, and more so modern medicine making certain conditions (that have a genetic predisposition) less lethal so that people still go on to reproduce. I mean if certain things no longer stop an individual from reproducing then is there really any evolutionary pressure on it anymore?
That’s exactly what I thought. If people with no wisdom teeth are able to pass their genes on better than people WITH wisdom teeth, then we’ll (slowly) evolve. If, however, there’s no difference in the ability to procreate ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I am interested in this one too. I am trying to switch to a biology career just so I can investigate the gene that triggers the morphogenesis of a tadpoles gills into the lungs of a frog. I believe so much will come from hacking this morphogenesis gene. 😃 Personally I'm hoping to make self fertilizing chicken eggs, in order to establish an abundant wild chicken population.
I've felt for a long while that due to modern medicine, technology, and culture, humanity might actually "devolve". There are certain terminal childhood diseases that we can now cure, where those kids now have a chance to be adults. There are certain mutations that make us look a certain way that would normally affect out social status, but makeup and plastic surgery can make us look "normal". Certain behaviors that annoy certain people can be medicated, or we're taught to be more accepting. None of this is really a bad thing, because I believe everyone, no matter what you look like or what your background is, deserves a chance to live a full life. But at the same time, if mother nature were to have things go "her way", a lot of these people wouldn't be able to breed. I don't necessarily have a problem with this, because it takes the best of society to give a disadvantaged person a chance to actually have a life. Though, it does worry me about the future of our species.
i am creating a video game /table top game that fairly interesting. in it humanity has ove rpopulated Earth and over time humanity started colonizing other worlds to solve the problem in Humanity started doing Genetic Enginneering for these New Worlds creating more evolved Human to survives these world. however they didnt stop or try terraforming these worlds and created stronger adaptations for said world it ended up creating sub species of Humanity nearly all still part of the Global United Nation but some not so much. and for course their still humans that only want to remain Pure or some becoming more Cybornetic but in the end they did start terraforming turning Earth into a Gaia world with green lands above and massive cities below ground Mars tho is an Industrial wasteland purposly tho in order to manerfactor stuff faster and better their planet that are just Hotels other that are Banking planet and Dyson spheres in the works.
Trace! I think you teased this for the next episode, but I believe that human technology is our current evolutionary path. I'm not talking about BCI's either (I enjoyed watching your series about the human brain btw), but rather a new type of lifeform that is birthed by humans through technology. I'm fairly certain AI will take form and become a new species within the next 20-30 years (so long as the folks who are working on this technology aren't stifled through policy or any other calamity). I have no facts to backup my claim and I'm not a scientist, but I don't see how something like that will not exist given our current technological trajectory and track record. What do you think?
They already have mechanical digestive system that have the perfect gut enzymes and bacteria; in order to inoculate humans with a balanced and diversified microbiome. (It helps with lactose intolerance). They have been working on synthetic incubators so women don't have to carry children anymore. .. synthetic incubators will give way to uncorrupted cloning. .. which will allow for more extravagant human gene experimentation.
I often come to comment section for asking questions I that comes in my mind but before I hit the send button, Trace answers that. That's very very quick reply skill.
The research seems to indicate most animals (even some we keep as pets) don’t have episodic memory, or theory of mind. They can’t understand why other animals might do this or that, and don’t have an understanding that something WAS yesterday and WILL BE tomorrow. So they aren’t conscious, as far as we know
@@TraceDominguez They do have emotional and affective states though right. I think that maybe your definition of conscious thought is a bit restricted. But that's an interesting perspective.
I'm more on the lines of extreme climate shift concentration as a result of energetic particles entering the earth's atmosphere (Ozone depleted areas) at the poles and that energy being spread among the global electric circuit, and creating more cloud cover which shifts local climate rapidly in terms of geological time scale, in a matter of years. We're seeing that now in the marked collapse of the Beaufort Gyre and AMOC. It first occurs in the southern region, then the more northern regions follows a few years later. During this time, there are fewer sunspots while our solar system encounters the galactic sheet. This energy can also activate our sun's micronova cycle and boom.. our electrical grid we've come too dependent upon wipes out 90%+ of our population.
@@TraceDominguez It's actually quite more simple than trying to make anthropogenic cause fit for climate change in the modeling, when it's still leaving holes in the model. Perhaps read the Weatherman's Guide to the Sun, 3rd Edition, used in 300 universities. If cost is a concern, the bibliography is free on the author's website. It's just as simple to understand the major melting effects of energetic solar and cosmic particles that enter at the poles, melt the ice, increase salinity and create dramatic climate change.
I am sure Richard Dawkins is watching this and saying “wow this is awesome” then there is the mighty Noel Gallagher I am sure he is saying “ this is wonderful (wonderwall)” and then there are the other UA-cam hosts who are all saying “why can’t I be as good as Trace”
![Data Modeling for Power BI [Full Course] 📊](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MrLnibFTtbA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Data Modeling for Power BI [Full Course] 📊](/img/tr.png)
19:00 - That doesn't sound right. The phrase "climate change" was invented by scientists to dispel arguments like "if global warming is real, then why is it snowing in March?"; because "global warming" confuses simple people who think that it's a simple matter of the whole planet getting hotter and nothing else. "Climate change" encapsulates all kinds of climatic disruptions including late winters, early frosts, hurricanes, floods, etc. in addition to just desertification. - On a related note, the Obama administration specifically used the acronym ISIL instead of ISIS to avoid ruining the ancient name for everybody including the Egyptian goddess, a nail salon in New York, and a little girl, all of whom got flack because of the jerkorist group. Unfortunately the good intention didn't work because righties used that (possibly from Hanlon's razor 🤔) as a way to attack him for "being unable to even say their name". 🙄 🤦
You’re right! I did say “invented” but I meant “promoted” The term “climatic change” was first used to describe these changes in earth’s climate in 1975. That said, it wasn’t the most common or popular term. In fact, it was used alongside others like “inadvertent climate modification” and “global warming” (the latter made popular after a congressional hearing on the topic caused an explosion in climate coverage in the press). Not long after, Frank Luntz (a republican strategist) wrote a paper all about how republicans should be pro-environment and get “back to nature” but using the term global warming was too activating. He promoted and suggested climate change bc it was more wonky. Eventually, NASA and more dispassionate scientists prefer “global climate shift.” But either way, the spirit of the point I made in the video stands: the term is used to discourage people to act.
web.archive.org/web/20150203081915/www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001330.php
Tom Scott brought me here...now I'm staying. You deserve so many more subs. This is the content UA-cam needs more of!
Used to watch science plus everyday. Happy for these episodes. Thanks Trace!
So glad you found me!
You definitely deserve more subs man!!!😘😘 love your videos
Thank you! Working on it ;)
Does anyone know what camera Trace uses? I’ve been watching a lot of his videos since the Tom Scott one this morning. This is definitely a 4K camera, but I’d love to know what camera/lens combo he uses
I'm so glad I found your channel. These videos are excellent. Your presentation is absolutely superb. And the references.. oh the references! (2001, The Fifth Element, Waterworld, Starcraft, etc.) I love it! Haha. 👍👍
Awesome, thank you!
I've heard that more and more people are being born without wisdom teeth and I wonder if that will continue in the future since they're mostly problematic in modern day. I also wonder if the rate of evolution for humans has slowed due to longer lifetimes, having children later in life, and more so modern medicine making certain conditions (that have a genetic predisposition) less lethal so that people still go on to reproduce. I mean if certain things no longer stop an individual from reproducing then is there really any evolutionary pressure on it anymore?
That’s exactly what I thought. If people with no wisdom teeth are able to pass their genes on better than people WITH wisdom teeth, then we’ll (slowly) evolve. If, however, there’s no difference in the ability to procreate ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Great series
Thank you!
Trace "Star Hustler" Dominguez...fyi you can see Trace on many PBS stations Stargazer segments.
That’s true!
Since I can't swim, I opt for guill mutation genes...lol...Another terrific vid...
I’d love to breathe underwater
I am interested in this one too. I am trying to switch to a biology career just so I can investigate the gene that triggers the morphogenesis of a tadpoles gills into the lungs of a frog.
I believe so much will come from hacking this morphogenesis gene.
😃 Personally I'm hoping to make self fertilizing chicken eggs, in order to establish an abundant wild chicken population.
15:50 ADHD used to be an advantage in the past when those who had it were better hunters.
as a person with ADHD, i hope this is the case...
I've felt for a long while that due to modern medicine, technology, and culture, humanity might actually "devolve". There are certain terminal childhood diseases that we can now cure, where those kids now have a chance to be adults. There are certain mutations that make us look a certain way that would normally affect out social status, but makeup and plastic surgery can make us look "normal". Certain behaviors that annoy certain people can be medicated, or we're taught to be more accepting.
None of this is really a bad thing, because I believe everyone, no matter what you look like or what your background is, deserves a chance to live a full life. But at the same time, if mother nature were to have things go "her way", a lot of these people wouldn't be able to breed.
I don't necessarily have a problem with this, because it takes the best of society to give a disadvantaged person a chance to actually have a life. Though, it does worry me about the future of our species.
i am creating a video game /table top game that fairly interesting.
in it humanity has ove rpopulated Earth and over time humanity started colonizing other worlds to solve the problem in Humanity started doing Genetic Enginneering for these New Worlds creating more evolved Human to survives these world.
however they didnt stop or try terraforming these worlds and created stronger adaptations for said world it ended up creating sub species of Humanity nearly all still part of the Global United Nation but some not so much.
and for course their still humans that only want to remain Pure or some becoming more Cybornetic
but in the end they did start terraforming turning Earth into a Gaia world with green lands above and massive cities below ground Mars tho is an Industrial wasteland purposly tho in order to manerfactor stuff faster and better their planet that are just Hotels other that are Banking planet and Dyson spheres in the works.
Trace! I think you teased this for the next episode, but I believe that human technology is our current evolutionary path. I'm not talking about BCI's either (I enjoyed watching your series about the human brain btw), but rather a new type of lifeform that is birthed by humans through technology. I'm fairly certain AI will take form and become a new species within the next 20-30 years (so long as the folks who are working on this technology aren't stifled through policy or any other calamity). I have no facts to backup my claim and I'm not a scientist, but I don't see how something like that will not exist given our current technological trajectory and track record. What do you think?
You’ll see on Wednesday but there’s definitely some alignment there!
They already have mechanical digestive system that have the perfect gut enzymes and bacteria; in order to inoculate humans with a balanced and diversified microbiome. (It helps with lactose intolerance).
They have been working on synthetic incubators so women don't have to carry children anymore.
.. synthetic incubators will give way to uncorrupted cloning.
.. which will allow for more extravagant human gene experimentation.
You must construct additional pylons!
OKAY OKAY
I just gotta wait until my little dudes are done warping in this gateway… I need some zealots.
Unfortunately yes.... We've all seen "Idiocracy"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i barely understand what you're saying but I cant stop watching
Thanks, i think!
I often come to comment section for asking questions I that comes in my mind but before I hit the send button, Trace answers that. That's very very quick reply skill.
Thank you! I try to anticipate as many questions as possible
I think saying bird's don't have conscious thought might be a bit of a stretch!
The research seems to indicate most animals (even some we keep as pets) don’t have episodic memory, or theory of mind. They can’t understand why other animals might do this or that, and don’t have an understanding that something WAS yesterday and WILL BE tomorrow. So they aren’t conscious, as far as we know
@@TraceDominguez They do have emotional and affective states though right. I think that maybe your definition of conscious thought is a bit restricted. But that's an interesting perspective.
How do lone wolfs effect the evolution of the world?
They don’t. The lone wolf is a wolf who cannot pass down their genetics.
@@TraceDominguez 🤔
wouldn't medicine slow this down?
I'm more on the lines of extreme climate shift concentration as a result of energetic particles entering the earth's atmosphere (Ozone depleted areas) at the poles and that energy being spread among the global electric circuit, and creating more cloud cover which shifts local climate rapidly in terms of geological time scale, in a matter of years. We're seeing that now in the marked collapse of the Beaufort Gyre and AMOC. It first occurs in the southern region, then the more northern regions follows a few years later. During this time, there are fewer sunspots while our solar system encounters the galactic sheet.
This energy can also activate our sun's micronova cycle and boom.. our electrical grid we've come too dependent upon wipes out 90%+ of our population.
I would say Occam’s Razor would eliminate that as the cause of climate change :)
@@TraceDominguez It's actually quite more simple than trying to make anthropogenic cause fit for climate change in the modeling, when it's still leaving holes in the model. Perhaps read the Weatherman's Guide to the Sun, 3rd Edition, used in 300 universities. If cost is a concern, the bibliography is free on the author's website.
It's just as simple to understand the major melting effects of energetic solar and cosmic particles that enter at the poles, melt the ice, increase salinity and create dramatic climate change.
I am sure Richard Dawkins is watching this and saying “wow this is awesome” then there is the mighty Noel Gallagher I am sure he is saying “ this is wonderful (wonderwall)” and then there are the other UA-cam hosts who are all saying “why can’t I be as good as Trace”
You’re going to make me blush!$!
Was waiting for this!! Love you Trace
Thanks! Happy Monday
just had my wisdom tooth removed, its amazing to see evolution
Hahaha nice
Great video as always ;)
*bows*