That's type 100 film (packfilm) - sadly not in production nowadays (you can still find it easy on ebay but you're not gonna like the price). And there were several professional cameras made to shot with like Polaroid 180/190/195, Polaroid 600se and many adapters for professional film cameras.
@@lubowrc Thanks for the info! I have the regular ol' SX-70 which I find amazing, but I have never obtain such quality on my images, the sharpness of that lense and color sensibility in that film must've been incredible
@@Mmxxaamm Yes. This type of film is/was able to give very fine detail and clarity. And some variants of it were able to produce positive print and a negative, so one exposure can technically yield the initial positive print and after a reclaiming process, a usable negative.
@@emiliaburgos5404 Definitely not, even if it imitates it a bit. I've heard that soundtrack (by the group "Can") often enough - and it is actually one of the rare flaws of that film that, as good as the music is, it returns a little too often. But I don't know what the music is in this video.
Of course, Polaroids and -in general- photographs taken spontaneously, are an extension of memory. Wim Wenders is an excellent photographer and a genius at sequential processing of 24 frames per second. 📸 🎥 Por supuesto, las Polaroid y -en general- las fotografías tomadas espontáneamente, son una prolongación de la memoria.
Was lucky to get to hear him talk about some of his films a couple years ago. Great stuff!
That last shot. Epic.
love him! next level cinematographer
❤️
Who are you?
Paris, Texas ❤️
1:12 WTF, what polaroid camera can achieve such sharpness
That's type 100 film (packfilm) - sadly not in production nowadays (you can still find it easy on ebay but you're not gonna like the price). And there were several professional cameras made to shot with like Polaroid 180/190/195, Polaroid 600se and many adapters for professional film cameras.
@@lubowrc Thanks for the info! I have the regular ol' SX-70 which I find amazing, but I have never obtain such quality on my images, the sharpness of that lense and color sensibility in that film must've been incredible
@@Mmxxaamm Yes. This type of film is/was able to give very fine detail and clarity. And some variants of it were able to produce positive print and a negative, so one exposure can technically yield the initial positive print and after a reclaiming process, a usable negative.
This was beautiful!
His comments are remarkable.
Interesting perspectives
Lovely. Can someone tell me the name of the song that is being played in the background?
I think is from the Alice in the Cities soundtrack
@@emiliaburgos5404 Definitely not, even if it imitates it a bit. I've heard that soundtrack (by the group "Can") often enough - and it is actually one of the rare flaws of that film that, as good as the music is, it returns a little too often. But I don't know what the music is in this video.
Tarkovsky, also a poet, director.
Love this dude the truth
Wow.
Of course, Polaroids and -in general- photographs taken spontaneously, are an extension of memory.
Wim Wenders is an excellent photographer and a genius at sequential processing of 24 frames per second.
📸 🎥
Por supuesto, las Polaroid y -en general- las fotografías tomadas espontáneamente, son una prolongación de la memoria.
Is it only me or new polaroid films suck compared to old ones?
💞💞💞💞
Gentlemen take Polaroids.