Small correction on Chinas hypersonic weapons: Hypersonic Glide Vehicles (HGVs) don’t orbit the earth at all and rarely enter space, they are made to go up on a traditional booster and glide down from a low altitude. What you were describing was a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) which is made to sit in orbit for an indefinite period and then deorbit above a target, and FOBS are rarely classified as hypersonic weapons because while they do come in above mach 5, they usually don’t have maneuvering capabilities due to the angle of reentry. It sounds like semantics, but if mach 5 was the only requirement the first ballistic missiles from the 40s would count as hypersonic weapons.
Congrats, you figured it out. We HAVE had hypersonic weapons since the 40's. This current hype is literally just propaganda, just like calling auto-complete on steroids "AI" for propaganda reasons.
@ I wouldn’t call it hype. True hypersonic weapons (HWs) do pose real challenges for current missile defense systems since they are geared for ballistic missiles. The way missile defense currently works is you see the missile go up and from there it’s easy to figure out not only where it’s gonna land, but where it’s gonna be at all times in its flight path because it’s a predictable ballistic arc and from there you put an interceptor in its way. Think of it like trying to stop a speeding car by looking at where it’s going and dropping a concrete block it’s path to stop it. True HWs are challenging because; 1. Their ability to maneuver means you can’t predict their trajectory and in turn can’t place an interceptor in its path easily 2. It’s target is far less clear because that maneuverability means it can either fake it’s path or make a last minute change 3. Because they fly so low, they take advantage of the earth’s curvature and are able to avoid detection until potentially too late. The major take away you need here is that speed does not matter if you are predictable which true HWs are not, hence why Ballistic missiles are not considered HWs, because even though they technically achieve mach 5 they are extremely predictable. Now this does not mean doom and gloom, true HWs are extremely expensive, so they can’t be fired en mass or against any old target. These are highly specialized tools that are geared to exploit an opening in current missile defense systems. Should we all be afraid for our lives? No. Is there real strategic concern since we don’t have a counter for it yet? Absolutely. These arnt the same as the ballistic missiles we’ve had for decades, it’s gonna take time to find a working countermeasure and until then we will continue to worry about it the same way we worry about drones and autonomous weapons. Until the shield catches up to the sword, there needs to be emphasis on pushing the shield to get there.
I work in the space industry and I can tell you, blowing things up in orbit is a really bad idea. The amount of space junk is reaching critical mass and we are risking space becoming inaccessible if we keep this up. This is something that really worries me for the future as it is all but inevitable eventually.
@ That is good, but the energy of a big explosion can send some of that debris into orbit. The US stunt to blow up a dying satellite back around 2010 took over a decade to clear up. In my opinion the practice should be internationally banned.
@@blakekendall6156 Whilst that is true it is of not an immediate matter when the object is a nuclear payload. Better space debris than population extermination.
China and Russia are already working on space weapons. Russia already threatened nuclear war against us, and our allies. We should take that threat seriously. I wish both Elon, and Vice President Trump gone from office. Yet making it clear we will defend our space is a good thing. Deterrence is the best option. If threatening war in heaven has to happen tomorrow to make peace here on Earth today. Then maybe it is better that way. No one gets to leave till we fix ourselves.
With the white hot anti Chinese venom of late you just couldn't trust a U Tube channel for truth. You could be right of course but these Americans are not known for objectivity. They play politics constantly. Witness the mess their country gets into so often.
Fair point I agree. However the video doesn't show with certainty that there was a rocket. Was that panic or mild concern? Could possibly have been storm or earthquake damage? Was the clip really from. China? Could have been taken from a million surveillance cameras anywhere in the world. Do you trust the video editor that much? Clearly has a strong political bias. Sure this channel has space pictures aplenty but it's not smart to swallow whole the interpretations of anonymous types on the internet. Bad foundation for personal beliefs 😂
I think it’s a pretty damn good idea, this system being proposed could intercept missles carrying nuclear warheads even traveling at 5+ times the speed of sound (hypersonic glide vehicles) All of our enemies are developing these weapons, they all hate us
The Outer Space Treaty bans WMDs. The Moon Treaty bans all weapons but the US never signed (it also requires UN approval for mining which would likely involve aid to starving Africans which the US felt was interfering too much with Capitalism).
It's always about the same old story about that LM-3 failure over 20 years ago, the protocols are strict enough now, no matter how impressive that may look but i sure do hope they'll be done with their infrastructures and new rockets as soon as possible in order to retire the LM2 to 4 only the military uses thoses, they should be almost done with their satellite constellation so i hope they'll be lucky enough to avoid any incident until they're done...
@@Sacto1654 Exit the infrastructure and logistical limitation that they've been working on for the last few years now that they have the money and plans to do so? That's what i'm trying to say, they're working on that, but at the same time they have strategic reasons to pursue their rise of power as fast as possible for both scientific and military sector.
One thing these people haven't thought about is the atmosphere, 150 tons of these space rocks hit us a day, how many hit the ground, very little, and they think a rocket from space travelling as fast will work?
@@amentco8445 Israel's Iron dome only worked against cheap unguided rockets powered by sugar lmao. We all saw the thing struggle against basic drones let alone traditional ballistic missiles fired by Iran. Now to Trump's idea: Do you know how many interceptors you would need to cover the whole earth at all times and how precise these interceptions would have to be? Achieving an interception rate of just 25% would bankrupt the US if it's even technically feasible. That idea is as ridiculous as the quest for world domination that America has been pursuing for decades, just admit that there are other countries that can hurt you as much as you can hurt them if not more, it's a lot cheaper and healthier in the long run.
@@amentco8445 Israel's is ground based, not in space. It also protects a very small area. What doesn't make sense, is things don't "float" in space, they're moving at around 27000kmh. It takes about 90mins for something to make an orbit. So there would need to be thousands of whatever is planned whipping around up there to be any kind of effective and have any kind of coverage. It's the same reason the silly tungsten rods idea never because a thing. It can take a very long time to put an orbiting satellite over a specific area.
Can you disclose who is your sponsor. I noticed that you are trying really hard to criticize China, but ignore what US is doing and has done before. Think about the “broken arrow”, and many other in the old time.
Even Top Gear managed to avoid any centres of civilisation when they crashed their spacecraft. And they restrained themselves from aiming it at Lancashire.
"Guizhou is considered one of the poorest provinces in China, with a large portion of its population living below the poverty line due to its mountainous terrain, lack of accessible flat land, and limited economic development opportunities." But wait... did I misseeing things there. How come the poorest people in China still able to afford to own their personal cars there?
China does have a coastal launch site, I think it's off the coast of Macau. I think they use the inland sites for classified payloads. No excuse though.
im sorry but these are two very different situations, the top two comments have pointed out why. Have you ever consider those previous launch test ? I hope you’re just joking because there’s no way a normal person would think that these are the same
Here I thought China killing its own citizens was tearing down China's credibility and achievements. I guess you agree with China that Chinese life is cheap.
NGL, the defense system the trump regime wants is extremely worrying for 2 reasons. 1)It opens the floodgates to space militarization, this will harm progress in other kinds of space based infrastructure, research, exploration and experimentation. 2) It signifies an EXTREMELY dangerous intention of global expansionism. When both sides have nuclear weapons the threat of retaliation stops war from breaking out due to mutual assured destruction. In this case a paradox occurs: developing a means to stop the nukes of others is the offensive move, not the defensive one. This is because it would allow you to use yours without worrrying for retaliation. This is extremely bad.
Wow this is the aerospace version of Facebook's "Move fast and break things" philosophy. Incredibly dangerous. This is why the US can never make the same amount of progress even with the same resources at their disposal. Just imagine the uproar if this happened over there 🤣
Aren't hypersonic vehicles basically blind because of the ionization of the atmosphere around it? So how could it meaningfully navigate in the atmosphere?
I don't know the details, but the plasma isn't totally opaque. SpaceX have shown continuous video streams from a booster reentering the atmosphere all the way to landing. This illustrates that both light and radio waves can get through, if they are strong enough and of the right wavelengths. Also, they can still use inertial guidance.
@@adamadamadamadam ... W R O N G . The SpaceX Starlink antennas worked because the (horizontally flying ) ship was huge and created a large hole in the plasma.. That's why only 1 side of the ship has heat tiles.
It's not a problem: It's an advantage. When you don't have to slow down for or care about civilian injuries, you move faster. You can debate the relative merits of this approach.
You can say the same for SpaceX when they rain debris on the Caribbean. Difference is that China is fixing the problem by moving their launch sites to Hainan where they have more space to land the rockets.
For being socialist, china sure doesn't give a shit about being socially minded. But I'm sure the American version of elitist socialism would have been different.
Why would the PRC take steps to make their test launches safer? Communists don’t see citizens as people, but property of the state. As such, their disposition for furthering the state, either intentionally or accidentally, is the privilege of the state. Civilians dying because of say, a rocket booster falling on them, furthers the state and brings pride to their surviving family members.
Uh yeah sure. That is why China is the only country that is actively trying to eradicate poverty and homelessness among its citizens. But no, according to your genius brain, they don't care at all. Sure. yeah.
I wish we didnt need to further militarize space, but we dont really have a choice. Sad that the Chinse people have gotten so much appreciation lately, deservedly so, but their government still does such bad things.
According to western research and polls (most notably research by Harvard), the Chinese people love their government, and that is what matters. I admire US citizens, but not their government. Based on US opinion polls, US citizens also hate their government. Why don't US citizens fix their government first? Oh thats right, they can't because their govt is controlled by corporations and big money interests. What a hell hole.
@@PaxAlotin Gullible huh? Tell that to Harvard. It was their research that proved Chinese love their government. Speaking of gullible, you think US can fix their govt every 4 years? HAHAHAHAHAHA hilarious. The US polls show that the US citizens have no trust or faith in their govt regardless of Democrats or Republicans.
China is already ahead of the u.s. in many areas including space. the only thing i don't like about it is their secrecy because of security matters. the ton of engineers china has first help the chinese communist party before releasing only a chunk of the real discoveries to the public. DEEPSEEK first received the approval to release their AI model from the chinese government but the two heavy weights in AI in china already have an ace under their sleeve. watch it how when the u.s. military try to take on china our armed forces will be defeated for the whole world to see and the rest of us being surprised by their military technology.
I wouldn't allow India 2 fly me anywhere! China neither! Space is hard, that's why Rocket Science & Space are intertwined or joined at the hip! When you're traveling 18,000 mph & headed towards a fast moving target, milli-seconds add up to 100's or 1000's of miles!
I trust in my family, God, POTUS Donald J. Trump & Elon Musk! China, India, Russia, even the EU cannot come close to America when it comes 2 space! Trump is all about space & Elon Musk, well he practically invented space! These past 22 years anyway!
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Small correction on Chinas hypersonic weapons: Hypersonic Glide Vehicles (HGVs) don’t orbit the earth at all and rarely enter space, they are made to go up on a traditional booster and glide down from a low altitude. What you were describing was a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) which is made to sit in orbit for an indefinite period and then deorbit above a target, and FOBS are rarely classified as hypersonic weapons because while they do come in above mach 5, they usually don’t have maneuvering capabilities due to the angle of reentry. It sounds like semantics, but if mach 5 was the only requirement the first ballistic missiles from the 40s would count as hypersonic weapons.
Congrats, you figured it out. We HAVE had hypersonic weapons since the 40's. This current hype is literally just propaganda, just like calling auto-complete on steroids "AI" for propaganda reasons.
@ I wouldn’t call it hype. True hypersonic weapons (HWs) do pose real challenges for current missile defense systems since they are geared for ballistic missiles. The way missile defense currently works is you see the missile go up and from there it’s easy to figure out not only where it’s gonna land, but where it’s gonna be at all times in its flight path because it’s a predictable ballistic arc and from there you put an interceptor in its way. Think of it like trying to stop a speeding car by looking at where it’s going and dropping a concrete block it’s path to stop it. True HWs are challenging because; 1. Their ability to maneuver means you can’t predict their trajectory and in turn can’t place an interceptor in its path easily 2. It’s target is far less clear because that maneuverability means it can either fake it’s path or make a last minute change 3. Because they fly so low, they take advantage of the earth’s curvature and are able to avoid detection until potentially too late. The major take away you need here is that speed does not matter if you are predictable which true HWs are not, hence why Ballistic missiles are not considered HWs, because even though they technically achieve mach 5 they are extremely predictable.
Now this does not mean doom and gloom, true HWs are extremely expensive, so they can’t be fired en mass or against any old target. These are highly specialized tools that are geared to exploit an opening in current missile defense systems. Should we all be afraid for our lives? No. Is there real strategic concern since we don’t have a counter for it yet? Absolutely. These arnt the same as the ballistic missiles we’ve had for decades, it’s gonna take time to find a working countermeasure and until then we will continue to worry about it the same way we worry about drones and autonomous weapons. Until the shield catches up to the sword, there needs to be emphasis on pushing the shield to get there.
I work in the space industry and I can tell you, blowing things up in orbit is a really bad idea. The amount of space junk is reaching critical mass and we are risking space becoming inaccessible if we keep this up. This is something that really worries me for the future as it is all but inevitable eventually.
The defense network hits sub orbital targets.
@ That is good, but the energy of a big explosion can send some of that debris into orbit. The US stunt to blow up a dying satellite back around 2010 took over a decade to clear up. In my opinion the practice should be internationally banned.
@@blakekendall6156 Whilst that is true it is of not an immediate matter when the object is a nuclear payload. Better space debris than population extermination.
China and Russia are already working on space weapons.
Russia already threatened nuclear war against us, and our allies. We should take that threat seriously.
I wish both Elon, and Vice President Trump gone from office. Yet making it clear we will defend our space is a good thing.
Deterrence is the best option. If threatening war in heaven has to happen tomorrow to make peace here on Earth today. Then maybe it is better that way. No one gets to leave till we fix ourselves.
Fleeing in terror, not in THAT security camera clip. They took a few steps and stopped.
It looks like he panicked but couldn’t tell what direction to run the debris where probably right over him
With the white hot anti Chinese venom of late you just couldn't trust a U Tube channel for truth. You could be right of course but these Americans are not known for objectivity. They play politics constantly. Witness the mess their country gets into so often.
Once you can see a rocket heading your way, where do you run?
Fair point I agree. However the video doesn't show with certainty that there was a rocket. Was that panic or mild concern? Could possibly have been storm or earthquake damage? Was the clip really from. China? Could have been taken from a million surveillance cameras anywhere in the world. Do you trust the video editor that much? Clearly has a strong political bias. Sure this channel has space pictures aplenty but it's not smart to swallow whole the interpretations of anonymous types on the internet. Bad foundation for personal beliefs 😂
OP, don't be a fool.
I really hope military don't touch space cuz once we go that far there ain't no going back
Bro they’re already there they’ve been there for years
Without the military there might be not space exploration or at least it’ll be pushed back a long time dude.
LOL!!! You are literally 70 or so YEARS TO LATE!!!!!😂
we have already
@@hayden5280 YUP
Time to buy some more eggs
Can’t. Someone keeps buying them by the pallet load at Costco. It’s like toilet paper in 2020.
@@mylesgray3470 Why is that even the case? Who needs that many eggs?
@@MastaStackainsane liberals
@@amentco8445 Yep, has nothing to do with a world wide avian flu pandemic that's been going on for four years now...
@@amentco8445 Insane conservatives.
remember it doesn't take much of a nudge to destabilize an aerodynamic vehicle moving at five times the speed of sound.
Putin disagrees
of course he does...
5:30 - So basically, a way to give another shit ton of tax money to military contractors.
* elon
I think it’s a pretty damn good idea, this system being proposed could intercept missles carrying nuclear warheads even traveling at 5+ times the speed of sound (hypersonic glide vehicles)
All of our enemies are developing these weapons, they all hate us
Let the graft begin. The military is about to get lots of easy money
Minute 03:40 Actually many soviet and russian payloads were launched from Plesetsk, way up north.
Wait wasn't there a law made by the world where weapons couldn't be in space?
There are laws against most of what Trump does..
As if the Oligarch or his friends care
@Gurumeierhans lol
The Outer Space Treaty bans WMDs. The Moon Treaty bans all weapons but the US never signed (it also requires UN approval for mining which would likely involve aid to starving Africans which the US felt was interfering too much with Capitalism).
@eldrago19 so... That means that if we put weapons in space, the other countries would follow behind... That's still not good.
"SPACE FRIEND". I guess SPONGEBOB was already taken!
Keep in mind that, in great contrast to NASA, China also makes all it's launch deadlines & achieves its mission objectives.
Def a ccp bot💀
Yet they still haven’t put men on the Moon, or have deep space probes like Voyager…
Yes, that is because they do not care about their citizens dying.
@KsptubingI bet his IQ is higher than yours😂
@Ksptubing So they are a bot for stating facts? Ok then.
It's always about the same old story about that LM-3 failure over 20 years ago, the protocols are strict enough now, no matter how impressive that may look but i sure do hope they'll be done with their infrastructures and new rockets as soon as possible in order to retire the LM2 to 4 only the military uses thoses, they should be almost done with their satellite constellation so i hope they'll be lucky enough to avoid any incident until they're done...
I don't know--the Chinese rocket agencies should move all their rocket operations to the coast just for safety reasons.
@@Sacto1654 Exit the infrastructure and logistical limitation that they've been working on for the last few years now that they have the money and plans to do so?
That's what i'm trying to say, they're working on that, but at the same time they have strategic reasons to pursue their rise of power as fast as possible for both scientific and military sector.
5:42 Dear god what's old is new again. SDI for a modern 'civilized' world.
One thing these people haven't thought about is the atmosphere, 150 tons of these space rocks hit us a day, how many hit the ground, very little, and they think a rocket from space travelling as fast will work?
Red car reminds me of the first Heavy Metal movie. 🚘
At least they're not mass shooting each other... :D
I don't think they would tell us.
Iron Dome? Probably work about as well as Regan's Star Wars mess. Spend a boatload to not protect a bankrupt nation.
Israel's worked for forever. Why can't we also have that? It is that simple and I'm not going to pretend with you it's not.
@@amentco8445 Israel's Iron dome only worked against cheap unguided rockets powered by sugar lmao. We all saw the thing struggle against basic drones let alone traditional ballistic missiles fired by Iran.
Now to Trump's idea: Do you know how many interceptors you would need to cover the whole earth at all times and how precise these interceptions would have to be? Achieving an interception rate of just 25% would bankrupt the US if it's even technically feasible. That idea is as ridiculous as the quest for world domination that America has been pursuing for decades, just admit that there are other countries that can hurt you as much as you can hurt them if not more, it's a lot cheaper and healthier in the long run.
@ Israel isn't dealing with long range ICBMs and hypersonic re-entry weapons.
@@amentco8445 Israel's is ground based, not in space. It also protects a very small area.
What doesn't make sense, is things don't "float" in space, they're moving at around 27000kmh. It takes about 90mins for something to make an orbit. So there would need to be thousands of whatever is planned whipping around up there to be any kind of effective and have any kind of coverage. It's the same reason the silly tungsten rods idea never because a thing. It can take a very long time to put an orbiting satellite over a specific area.
@@TheGhungFu Clearly shows lack of factual background knowledge.
Another western propaganda
Laf, videographic evidence cross referenced with other sources, but you're ok with just dismissing this as propaganda. You really w live in a bubble.
@@ronjon7942 Indian bot
Can you disclose who is your sponsor. I noticed that you are trying really hard to criticize China, but ignore what US is doing and has done before. Think about the “broken arrow”, and many other in the old time.
America did something bad once, so we can't criticize China dropping toxic chemicals on its people?
W? Tf?
In the old time? 😂
Even Top Gear managed to avoid any centres of civilisation when they crashed their spacecraft. And they restrained themselves from aiming it at Lancashire.
Weapons and space make zero sense when we already have ICBMs which do the same thing minus traveling to orbit
This is old "Star Wars" program - Space Based Kinetic Energy Weapon, SBKEW.
"Guizhou is considered one of the poorest provinces in China, with a large portion of its population living below the poverty line due to its mountainous terrain, lack of accessible flat land, and limited economic development opportunities."
But wait... did I misseeing things there. How come the poorest people in China still able to afford to own their personal cars there?
I LOVE INDIA'S GAGANYAAN 4!! 🇮🇳
Ha! Great coverage. I randomly mentioned India space flight in a comment and BAMN! India coverage.
Sweet
China really needs to move to a coast
China does have a coastal launch site, I think it's off the coast of Macau. I think they use the inland sites for classified payloads. No excuse though.
China has easily 1500km of coastline lol
They have a launch site at Hainan now. Historically the older launch sites were in land to avoid the US and USSR to spy or launch strikes on them
All these idiots trying to leave Earth whilst destroying it.
I'd love more information on the condition of the Roadster.
Fake news. The 1996 crash genocided 1-2 million Uyghurs, not 500 villagers. lol
Again Fake news that was Tianmen square Massacre Incident.
fake news, it genocided 120 million Uyghurs /s
SpaceX did this with its last explosion also. It sent debris crashing into the Caribbean Island chain.
1. Safe propellant
2. Exceptionally remote area
Also it was an abnormal event not a planned crash.
im sorry but these are two very different situations, the top two comments have pointed out why. Have you ever consider those previous launch test ?
I hope you’re just joking because there’s no way a normal person would think that these are the same
@ Neither methane or Oxygen is a safe fuel. They are extreme fire hazards. Caribbean Islands are not remote. They are densely populated islands.
@ I agree SpaceX is much worse.
Very disappointed with how this video was heavily biased to tear down China's credibility and achievements over the last few decades.
Oh boo hoo we can't criticize China.
Here I thought China killing its own citizens was tearing down China's credibility and achievements. I guess you agree with China that Chinese life is cheap.
The 10 year olds are supporting china with this one. 🔥🗣️
What's that supposed to mean? Are you some would be leatherneck ? 😅
@ because 10 year olds try to be. “political”
@@PURPLEBUTTERFLY1010 If you're old just say that 😅
@ if you cant legally use the app just say it. 😂
Well rockets are missiles and not all the time their targets are their home land.
Communication experiment = tic toc tic toc
NGL, the defense system the trump regime wants is extremely worrying for 2 reasons.
1)It opens the floodgates to space militarization, this will harm progress in other kinds of space based infrastructure, research, exploration and experimentation.
2) It signifies an EXTREMELY dangerous intention of global expansionism. When both sides have nuclear weapons the threat of retaliation stops war from breaking out due to mutual assured destruction. In this case a paradox occurs: developing a means to stop the nukes of others is the offensive move, not the defensive one. This is because it would allow you to use yours without worrrying for retaliation.
This is extremely bad.
Please fix the Ai voice.
Wuddnt be surprised if China got to the moon before the U.S with a rocket made of Temu parts..
The guy running away leaving the lady (?) to take care of herself is hilarious.
It seems every country in space exploration has the same problem....so nothing unexpected......
Would Trump be violating the treaty about space based weapons?
People are really not talking about the laser coms
Wow this is the aerospace version of Facebook's "Move fast and break things" philosophy. Incredibly dangerous. This is why the US can never make the same amount of progress even with the same resources at their disposal. Just imagine the uproar if this happened over there 🤣
Does China have the materials technology for such a hypersonic missiles?
lol fake news
Aren't hypersonic vehicles basically blind because of the ionization of the atmosphere around it? So how could it meaningfully navigate in the atmosphere?
I don't know the details, but the plasma isn't totally opaque. SpaceX have shown continuous video streams from a booster reentering the atmosphere all the way to landing. This illustrates that both light and radio waves can get through, if they are strong enough and of the right wavelengths. Also, they can still use inertial guidance.
@@adamadamadamadam ... W R O N G . The SpaceX Starlink antennas worked because the (horizontally flying ) ship was huge and created a large hole in the plasma.. That's why only 1 side of the ship has heat tiles.
Starlink. You don’t actually think Musk was putting them up there for our benefit?
very good INS?
... T. The SpaceX Starlink antennas worked because the (horizontally flying ) ship was huge and created a large hole in the plasma
...as the Chinese population exploded. Interesting choice of words 😊
The bots are quick tonite
toneteue 🇫🇷
Propaganda.
so china occasionally rocket dumped into villages is propaganda ?
It's not a problem: It's an advantage. When you don't have to slow down for or care about civilian injuries, you move faster. You can debate the relative merits of this approach.
You can say the same for SpaceX when they rain debris on the Caribbean. Difference is that China is fixing the problem by moving their launch sites to Hainan where they have more space to land the rockets.
@elisgus135 hainan site cant accomodtae all of them, all three major china spaceports are deep inland while all US spaceports are at the coast
Re China claims that only 6 villagers died.. However that was the 6 that were found.
Using hypersonic orbital vehicles to defend from hypersonic missiles is a boondoggle. QWe will waste 100 of billions on this ... stuff.
For being socialist, china sure doesn't give a shit about being socially minded. But I'm sure the American version of elitist socialism would have been different.
They need to steal the safety protacals when they steal the plans for every thing they copy !
what do you expect?! it’s Made in China!
Iron Dome.....😂😂😂😂😂
As a Republican I don't like the idea of weapons in space
As a Democrat I don’t like
As a minor I don’t like the idea of weapons
Wanted a lunatic,, got a lunatic.
As an American, you all need to grow up and learn to protect yourselves.
Just stop believing these fearmongers
Weibo = "Way boh". Guizhou = "Gway Joe".
Star Wars V2
This video was useless, what was the big problem?
Why would the PRC take steps to make their test launches safer? Communists don’t see citizens as people, but property of the state. As such, their disposition for furthering the state, either intentionally or accidentally, is the privilege of the state. Civilians dying because of say, a rocket booster falling on them, furthers the state and brings pride to their surviving family members.
Uh yeah sure. That is why China is the only country that is actively trying to eradicate poverty and homelessness among its citizens. But no, according to your genius brain, they don't care at all. Sure. yeah.
2:36 - And Trump is wonder what's happen!
The Chinese don’t believe in FTS
Made in China.
Chinesium!
1996? I even haven't born yet dude!!!🤣😂
Lot's of China-bots in the comments!!!! 😂
-2000 social credit comrade.
The brave citizens were simply in awe of the power of the People's combined heavenly efforts
The Space Race is very pro china but this video reassures me that they are not propaganda and their opinions are honest.
@@jdogeyaherrera7768 note that there is an astoturf copycat of this channel called "Race To Space" that is wall-to-wall pro-China in a hilarious way
I wish we didnt need to further militarize space, but we dont really have a choice. Sad that the Chinse people have gotten so much appreciation lately, deservedly so, but their government still does such bad things.
Anti Chinese propagandist
waponizing space brake established space l,aw.
Mad China still using hydrozene in rockets haha
What else is new??? 😂
I admire the Chinese people ------- but not their government.
我就是中国🇨🇳人民，如果你喜欢我们，也要尊重我的政府。我国家的政府很好，对我们人民很好。
@@jiayuanfang1045 吠叫狗的宣傳。😅😆🤣
According to western research and polls (most notably research by Harvard), the Chinese people love their government, and that is what matters.
I admire US citizens, but not their government. Based on US opinion polls, US citizens also hate their government. Why don't US citizens fix their government first? Oh thats right, they can't because their govt is controlled by corporations and big money interests. What a hell hole.
@@the_NZH The American have the right to fix their government every four years. Chinese love their government -- LOL You really are gullible
@@PaxAlotin Gullible huh? Tell that to Harvard. It was their research that proved Chinese love their government.
Speaking of gullible, you think US can fix their govt every 4 years? HAHAHAHAHAHA hilarious.
The US polls show that the US citizens have no trust or faith in their govt regardless of Democrats or Republicans.
MAGA baby
LMFAO. Fail launch compare to India, pale by comparison?
China is already ahead of the u.s. in many areas including space. the only thing i don't like about it is their secrecy because of security matters. the ton of engineers china has first help the chinese communist party before releasing only a chunk of the real discoveries to the public. DEEPSEEK first received the approval to release their AI model from the chinese government but the two heavy weights in AI in china already have an ace under their sleeve. watch it how when the u.s. military try to take on china our armed forces will be defeated for the whole world to see and the rest of us being surprised by their military technology.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I wouldn't allow India 2 fly me anywhere! China neither! Space is hard, that's why Rocket Science & Space are intertwined or joined at the hip! When you're traveling 18,000 mph & headed towards a fast moving target, milli-seconds add up to 100's or 1000's of miles!
Bollywood.. 🎉🎉🎉
1 year ago video - why China will win the space race....... 😂😂
Chinese rockets... long march... short flight
FIRST
Sad😢
I trust in my family, God, POTUS Donald J. Trump & Elon Musk! China, India, Russia, even the EU cannot come close to America when it comes 2 space! Trump is all about space & Elon Musk, well he practically invented space! These past 22 years anyway!
😅😂🤣
Here early
Third! Haha… I ❤ this channel!
This kind of honest analysis would never be allowed in Xi's CCP China