Waaaow thank you for this! Didn't expect such a big difference especially in the low end and image field sounds better imo on the 369. Congrats on your first video 🔥🔥🔥
you just convinced me. and i’ll soon get one . in this video by listening on my I-pad it seems that you need to extend the release time of behringer . Thanks for this video.
People need stop giving Behringer hate, this video proves they’re fully capable of making amazing clones and anyone else who’s hating is just doing it cause it’s cool to hate behringer lol
There are plenty of reasons to hate on behringer. But making affordable gear that sounds pretty good is not one of them. Them making clones of other equipment and using cheap labor is not very cool though but you can blame the consumers just as much as behringer for that
After looking at their history - they dont get a pass from me. I also dont trust their gear. But its personal decision. People can do whatever they want.
well, first off...pretty amazing first video! Voice over audio was good, music was really great, and the shootout was done really well...I liked parts of both the plugin and the hardware...but in my facility on my studio monitors, the Behringer seemed to have a slightly more open top end, thicker low end punch and didn't seem to squash the mix as much
Hey, man! Congrats with your first video! Keep it up! Seems like behrinder has a little more punch. Kick kinda pops through the mix more, compared to plugin
Very nice demo, great sounding music, but not too complex to distract the attention from the matter at hand. The brighter plugin actually sounds louder, I wonder if you matched RMS or peak level? There's a case for peak level matching, because that's one of the selling points of analog. Maybe do both on the next video? Anyway nice work, thanks for the demo!
I don't hear a huge difference, but that doesn't mean the Behringer unit is bad, it has a nice punchy sound. I think loads of folks would love a Neve clone in their studio, irrespective of the badge name. Very useful!
The low end on the mixed bus examples sounds a bit more focused and saturated with the plug-in, but the Behringer hardware sounds like it has more low end extension less saturation in the lower frequencies. Both sound very nice… I suppose it is a case of choosing which ever you feel fits your mix better.
They are so close honestly. As someone who doesn't own any hardware apart from a mic and couple interfaces, I seriously can't even think why I would want to get outboard gear at this point. Plugins have just gotten TOO good. And especially with UAD and their unison tech, I don't even need to get a preamp either.
Thanks for the vid. Would like to hear some mixbusses that are really pushed to the limiter side of things, cranked. It was known for imparting some grit when done this way. Software will not be the same. Would like to hear that. Thanks!
Great video man!! Well done. 369 sounds really really good. Difficult to judge without a blind a/b but sounds like the various elements have more depth
honestly, I didn't like the Behringer nearly as much as the plug-in on the drum bus, but when you put it on the full stereo mix I kinda' liked it...thanks for the review!
It beat sounds good already without the processor, it might be overkill. just like I suspected. but for sure I am going to try and pick it up though. I want to mike beats going through a Marshall amp.
The plugin does this low end enhancement that the rack unit doesn’t. I actually enjoy the rack unit a bit more. Both plugin and rack sound and react great to the drums and full mix! Thanks for the comparison mate.
Plugin sounds lifeless like any other plugin I used over the last 20 years, Behringer gives it that analog character and subtle analog distortion that we all like in our music.
Congrats on your first video, you did a great job! It would be amazing if you could compare your unit to a real Neve version via Access Analog! Thank you!
I prefered the sound of the plugin with the settings you chose for this mix. Yes it did sound quite digital and contained, as you expressed the frequency response was slightly different, but what caught my ear was the fact that the 369 even though punchy was kind of choking the mix, the strings sounded better to my preference with the 369 but the mix as a whole sounded better with the settings on the neve plugin. I really want to get this unit in the future so I will be on the lookout for future reviews. Many thanks for this review! All the best, Mi-Shu
@@Notinserviceij Unless someone with ears and acumen imparts a sound within the digital realm that becomes pronounced enough for less knowledgeable folks such as yourself to discern a difference. Punchline =Digital has a sound and you sound less informed and lazy saying otherwise
@MultiFreddy34 digital doesn't have a sound period You can mention I'm "un informed" dozens of time For we listen to from a computer is still analog, can't hear 1s and 0s mate And second of all The sound going from converter into the comp and back tot he converter if left un touched will remain unchanged unless the converters colour or degrade the sound What you are thinking of is the Act of sound manipulation and the artefacts that come from that I.e. aliasing from use of plugins within a daw That's not really a sound of digital but hell I'm willing to give that to you, so plus 1 to you I guess End of the day though digital system without manipulation imparts not change to the sound, you can test this yourself FYI I look forward to your response about how I'm ill informed? Perhaps you work for neve or idk maybe you are just mad that I am right and for years you have be spouting this bs
Vielen Dank für das tolle Video! Das war doch ein super Einstieg 💪! Can you tell something about the build quality? It would also be awesome if you could open up the unit and show us whats inside. Thank you so much 😃!!
Behringer has a tiny bit more bass on mixbus, but obvious more low end on drum loop alone. Most likely if you add a slight Little Lab VOG to UAD (as to any plugin…) it is more than super to anyone. Hardware is also very welcome, and nothing against it. I’d say it’s individual’s preference.
I don't mind gaps between audio snippets. If a sonic difference is inaudible without careful A/B/C comparisons, the final audience will neither know nor care.
Very nice! It really shines on the mixbus. It feels wider and deeper. The UAD, though great, constricts the sound, kind of boxes it in, by comparison. Thank you!
Very impressed by the Behringer. The plugin clamps down a little too quickly on the snare which is what I feel like normally happens in compressor plugins vs hardware (which sometimes is cooler). The hardware lets its breathe a bit more. Crazy for cheap the hardware is compared to an actual neve
Pretty good actually. You got the comparison right. I hear a lot of difference here. The Behringer is usable, although I prefer the UAD emulation. Saved me a bunch of time. Thanks and well done.
I don't think you know how it's supposed to snap. It has the snap that the plugin has always lacked. It's ok if you don't understand that and stuff, but the Behringer is the real deal.
Good-sounding compression, but nothing to write home about, IMO. Attack time was possibly too fast for mix bus duties on both the plugin and hardware. I liked it on drums, though, especially what it did to the kick drums' low frequencies, shifting the focus onto the very lowest octaves. Again, I feel this is something that a stock compressor and an EQ can achieve, but I'm very utilitarian. More importantly to the video, I want to offer encouragement and praise: I am a professional audio engineer but also have a UA-cam addiction. I watch all the audio channels from Paul third to mixbus TV and in my qualified opinion this was excellent content. The audio examples are well level matched, clearly explained and the intro was appropriately long. Getting more light in your face, colour correcting aside, and everything else are there. Good editing, charming on camera presence, you come across as smart. I'd watch Hainbach for some clues about cute German middle-aged men taking their career to a new level from YT. Not to copy him, but notice and implement strategies that he implemented so well. He has a simple catchphrase at the start of each video, he looks calmly into the camera for good eye (camera) contact, etc. Zukunftsmusik as they say ;) All that aside, congrats on your first video, a brave move to make, and I wish you lots of success in the future. Ill look forward to the next one.
im not hearing a big difference. in future videos, dont stop and talk over the switching back and forth between FX and NOFX. its hard to pick up on the difference it makes when you stop the music and announce it and then start it back up again. just switch back and forth so people can hear the change.
@@montyrayza7220 Unless you’re paying somebody to do something you don’t make demands, you make polite suggestions. Obviously both you and the author of OG post are entitled pricks.
Would love to see blind test with these. Its very subtle. I thought the HW had a bit more punch but it could be down to settings & quite possible my imagination. I personally don't see the point of HW when we have such good plugins these days.
Congratulations for uploading your first video! Never thought I'd see a piece of hardware get outperformed by a plugin. I don't want to be overly negative, but too many corners have been cut for this Behringer unit to deliver the goods in any meaningful way (and that KT label gives me a really good idea of who else was involved, which explains why it sounds so bad). It doesn't have the same components as more expensive diode bridge compressors, so it's never going to sound anything like a 33609. Not even close.
The only obvius difference that can alter the sound with the revision C is the transformers. That is your opinion and It's far from the reality until proven otherwise.
The Behringer version handles the transients in a much more pleasing way. The UAD one sounds like all software compressors do, super grabby in a not pleasing way.
Is it me or sound examples were better sounding before any processing?)( uad and behringer took away some definition; drum loop were amazing by itself!)
Because it is 2024 it would make sense to do a A/B/C comparison since that is what this is: Dry, UAC, Behringer. Without chit-chat in between to make sure the tonality of ones memory remains in-tact between the 3 states. Also have parallel spectral analyses of the 3 states. Simply hoping someone notices it perceptually is very prone to placebo.. like asking if someone is listening to mp3, flac, cassette, or vinyl in a blind test. for the truly precise individual (the one who should actually care about whether or not something was recreated or is perfect, if it makes a difference at all) they should be capable of demonstrating that instead of talking about it like it's 1970 and people are supposed to sit there and nod and agree. It starts to come across more like they are practicing for some kind of audio-visual marketing role years from now. or practicing english (forgive me, but, you can always write a script, practice it, and do it multiple times, especially someone specializing in audio haha)
@@JordonBeal Because we are not in 1984 - it is very very simple to lock the input sample, chop it precisely at where it begins, invert its signal and subtract it from A-B, A-C, and so forth to prove that differences are actually being made. I'm just saying that the general technical game of people reviewing hardware is often probably 40 years behind technologically, even though they use cutting edge at-your-fingertips platforms to give this dated content to consumers to potentially drive purchase choice. Combine that with anyone who talks over the audio (that's like someone giving visual tech demonstrations and putting their head in the way of the screen while talking about whatever its showing) and it just gets kind of annoying. However, if this device is good, then fantastic. I didn't catch any single extremes being tested for it or anything... just the look of the meters on the physical device, clicking on/off... and all that. and this happens everywhere, lol.. all of the things I just complained about.
The UAD one clearly kills the low-end transients. On the other hand, comparison of the Behringer to the original Neve makes the Behringer sound like a plugin! 😅😅
Everybody has been waiting on this review. Thanks!
Waaaow thank you for this! Didn't expect such a big difference especially in the low end and image field sounds better imo on the 369. Congrats on your first video 🔥🔥🔥
Thanks for video. So far you are the only person, who tested it properly..
I love the punch added by the hardware! Those transients sound very good through it
The hardware seems to tame the highs better more like an actual record. Great job on this video.
I like the behringer better. I can hear the low end clearer than the uad plugin. Might try it out myself. Good video
Hardware does the job, thanks a lot for the professional demo👍
Loving that 'thump'......nice demo!
Hearing more of that signature snap on the mix buss from the Behringer...
you just convinced me. and i’ll soon get one . in this video by listening on my I-pad it seems that you need to extend the release time of behringer . Thanks for this video.
The Behringer sounds more open in comparison with the UAD plugin, curious about comparison with the Neve hardware. Thanks for this :)
A real review on a item that you bought, nice start ;)
Nice premiere, congrats!
1st UA-cam video = success! I liked it :-) good job and thanks for the content.
Thanks for this review. I pre-ordered this the same day the official trailer was released.
People need stop giving Behringer hate, this video proves they’re fully capable of making amazing clones and anyone else who’s hating is just doing it cause it’s cool to hate behringer lol
I think it’s pretty much 50/50, most of the comments seem to be pretty civil lol
@@TheSunshineGroup yeah nah I agree, just saying I always notice everyone hating on behringer. It’s just good to know the real recognize the real lol
There are plenty of reasons to hate on behringer. But making affordable gear that sounds pretty good is not one of them. Them making clones of other equipment and using cheap labor is not very cool though but you can blame the consumers just as much as behringer for that
I agree. I have some newer Behringer gear and it's really usable. The older stuff maybe not so much. They really have done wonders for the brand.
After looking at their history - they dont get a pass from me. I also dont trust their gear. But its personal decision. People can do whatever they want.
It's a good sounding compressor. Thanks for this.
Awesome review and overview!
Thanks for the comparisson
Thanks for sharing 👍🏼
Nice track and nice review. Thanks.
Top, thanks for your Videos. I do really enjoy this Box so far
great first video
well, first off...pretty amazing first video! Voice over audio was good, music was really great, and the shootout was done really well...I liked parts of both the plugin and the hardware...but in my facility on my studio monitors, the Behringer seemed to have a slightly more open top end, thicker low end punch and didn't seem to squash the mix as much
First of, the track is great! Love everything about it. The Behringer sounds good. I will get my hands on one soon for the mix bus.
Hey, man! Congrats with your first video! Keep it up! Seems like behrinder has a little more punch. Kick kinda pops through the mix more, compared to plugin
369 sounds REALLY good!
Nice sounding unit!
Very nice demo, great sounding music, but not too complex to distract the attention from the matter at hand. The brighter plugin actually sounds louder, I wonder if you matched RMS or peak level? There's a case for peak level matching, because that's one of the selling points of analog. Maybe do both on the next video? Anyway nice work, thanks for the demo!
I did pay attention to this and matched the recordings with peak level.
Thanks for the video.....plug in all day.
I don't hear a huge difference, but that doesn't mean the Behringer unit is bad, it has a nice punchy sound. I think loads of folks would love a Neve clone in their studio, irrespective of the badge name. Very useful!
The low end on the mixed bus examples sounds a bit more focused and saturated with the plug-in, but the Behringer hardware sounds like it has more low end extension less saturation in the lower frequencies.
Both sound very nice… I suppose it is a case of choosing which ever you feel fits your mix better.
The high end gels very nicely on the behringer those bell sounds are clearly getting more saturated on hardware
They are so close honestly. As someone who doesn't own any hardware apart from a mic and couple interfaces, I seriously can't even think why I would want to get outboard gear at this point. Plugins have just gotten TOO good. And especially with UAD and their unison tech, I don't even need to get a preamp either.
Thanks for the vid. Would like to hear some mixbusses that are really pushed to the limiter side of things, cranked. It was known for imparting some grit when done this way. Software will not be the same. Would like to hear that. Thanks!
Noted!
Unprocessed sound jus as good
Great video man!! Well done. 369 sounds really really good. Difficult to judge without a blind a/b but sounds like the various elements have more depth
honestly, I didn't like the Behringer nearly as much as the plug-in on the drum bus, but when you put it on the full stereo mix I kinda' liked it...thanks for the review!
I’m sure the hardware never would be a much bigger contrast but the beginner sound quite formidable.
great comparison. I had the Heritage audio version I had to sell it. Im gonna get the Behringer version.
It beat sounds good already without the processor, it might be overkill. just like I suspected. but for sure I am going to try and pick it up though. I want to mike beats going through a Marshall amp.
The plugin does this low end enhancement that the rack unit doesn’t. I actually enjoy the rack unit a bit more. Both plugin and rack sound and react great to the drums and full mix! Thanks for the comparison mate.
The hardware sounds like it adds a fuller sound. It’s not a huge difference but I hear it
That's pretty subjective without measurements, like when guitarist says it has a warmer tone, all very subjective.
I personally liked the hardware more, the plugin did a good job but wasn't my preference. great video over all.
Good video! behringer just announced their 2-channel 1073 clone im excited to see what that has in store
ohhh i buy that
Where did you see that announcement?
any source ?
@@tchip-bc1gp gearnews had it earlier today. But the video and page at their B's site came down, so it probably wasn't supposed to be known yet.
UAD is a little less wide with more transient attack, whereas the berhinger feels wider with more sustain and less attack, but in a musical way.
Plugin sounds lifeless like any other plugin I used over the last 20 years, Behringer gives it that analog character and subtle analog distortion that we all like in our music.
The 369 has more of a sense of 3d. you get a sense of the reverb tail of the clap as being more clearly defined, definitely makes a difference.
The Behringer is a wee bit wider and deeper than the plugin. They did a fantastic job with this.
Good job
goood video for someone who wanna buy this .
Congrats on your first video, you did a great job! It would be amazing if you could compare your unit to a real Neve version via Access Analog! Thank you!
Someone will do it here soon.
I did. It’s in Part II.
UAD is thick, Neve is phat but Behringer takes you dancing and does your laundry - congrats on the first video!
People continue to sleep on behringer. I think the unit is fantastic.
the music is cool
I prefered the sound of the plugin with the settings you chose for this mix.
Yes it did sound quite digital and contained, as you expressed the frequency response was slightly different, but what caught my ear was the fact that the 369 even though punchy was kind of choking the mix, the strings sounded better to my preference with the 369 but the mix as a whole sounded better with the settings on the neve plugin.
I really want to get this unit in the future so I will be on the lookout for future reviews.
Many thanks for this review!
All the best,
Mi-Shu
That is precisely what I heard. Single elements are fatter and punchier on the Behringer, but the overall mix sounds better with the plugin.
Ffs digital doesn't have a sound
@@Notinserviceij This is so ironic (especially on an audio engineering video) considering you are listening to digital audio right now.
@@Notinserviceij Unless someone with ears and acumen imparts a sound within the digital realm that becomes pronounced enough for less knowledgeable folks such as yourself to discern a difference. Punchline =Digital has a sound and you sound less informed and lazy saying otherwise
@MultiFreddy34 digital doesn't have a sound period
You can mention I'm "un informed" dozens of time
For we listen to from a computer is still analog, can't hear 1s and 0s mate
And second of all
The sound going from converter into the comp and back tot he converter if left un touched will remain unchanged unless the converters colour or degrade the sound
What you are thinking of is the Act of sound manipulation and the artefacts that come from that I.e. aliasing from use of plugins within a daw
That's not really a sound of digital but hell I'm willing to give that to you, so plus 1 to you I guess
End of the day though digital system without manipulation imparts not change to the sound, you can test this yourself FYI
I look forward to your response about how I'm ill informed? Perhaps you work for neve or idk maybe you are just mad that I am right and for years you have be spouting this bs
Vielen Dank für das tolle Video! Das war doch ein super Einstieg 💪! Can you tell something about the build quality? It would also be awesome if you could open up the unit and show us whats inside. Thank you so much 😃!!
Probably in Part IV I’ll do a conclusion section and talk about the built quality.
Behringer has a tiny bit more bass on mixbus, but obvious more low end on drum loop alone. Most likely if you add a slight Little Lab VOG to UAD (as to any plugin…) it is more than super to anyone. Hardware is also very welcome, and nothing against it.
I’d say it’s individual’s preference.
Good luck with channel. Enjoy the hardware. I think it's worth keeping.
I don't mind gaps between audio snippets. If a sonic difference is inaudible without careful A/B/C comparisons, the final audience will neither know nor care.
good video and explianing good sir
The hardware actually did sound better to me. Maybe with some more adjustments they can match?
the actual hardware has a tab bit more high end clarity
yet the uad neve is there all one will need to do is recover some eq hi end is desired.
UAD more punch. Behri more width maybe? Thanks for sharing.
The Behringer has a tighter bottom end but I prefer the balance and tone from the UAD.
nice
Plug-in has more jump in each audio example. The onset of compression is very different.
That video was not bad at all. The audio comparison was well done.
wow compared to the plugin, this sound better as it should but i was not expecting that lol i think i might need to get one
great video all i need know
sorry for my english behringer 369 generate body in audio
good comparison. this $500 unit is definitely kicking guts.
I'm listening through my phone speaker, and still then to my ears, the Behringer has more snap, tightness in the low end and sheen in the highs.
Very nice! It really shines on the mixbus. It feels wider and deeper. The UAD, though great, constricts the sound, kind of boxes it in, by comparison. Thank you!
Fantastic video! Thanks for sharing. The difference is not subtle. Behringer takes this one.
that is pretty awesome how transparent the behringer is
..this unit instantly sounded good, we done Behringer....and Christoph K
The Behringer has more loudness differences/ lively. The plug in is consistent
Something about the timing and behavior of the kick. It’s smoother on the plug-in and pointier on the hardware. Not worse, just different.
Very impressed by the Behringer. The plugin clamps down a little too quickly on the snare which is what I feel like normally happens in compressor plugins vs hardware (which sometimes is cooler). The hardware lets its breathe a bit more. Crazy for cheap the hardware is compared to an actual neve
UAD sounds killer
UA-cam algorithms suck and wreck the sound so you always need to go to the store on any gear to really know
It’s definitely not a bad unit.
Great review! For my taste the UAD plugin kills the whole bass/kick. Behringer and the unprocessed signal sound best for me.
Pretty good actually. You got the comparison right. I hear a lot of difference here. The Behringer is usable, although I prefer the UAD emulation. Saved me a bunch of time. Thanks and well done.
I don't think you know how it's supposed to snap. It has the snap that the plugin has always lacked. It's ok if you don't understand that and stuff, but the Behringer is the real deal.
Good-sounding compression, but nothing to write home about, IMO. Attack time was possibly too fast for mix bus duties on both the plugin and hardware. I liked it on drums, though, especially what it did to the kick drums' low frequencies, shifting the focus onto the very lowest octaves. Again, I feel this is something that a stock compressor and an EQ can achieve, but I'm very utilitarian.
More importantly to the video, I want to offer encouragement and praise: I am a professional audio engineer but also have a UA-cam addiction. I watch all the audio channels from Paul third to mixbus TV and in my qualified opinion this was excellent content. The audio examples are well level matched, clearly explained and the intro was appropriately long. Getting more light in your face, colour correcting aside, and everything else are there. Good editing, charming on camera presence, you come across as smart. I'd watch Hainbach for some clues about cute German middle-aged men taking their career to a new level from YT. Not to copy him, but notice and implement strategies that he implemented so well. He has a simple catchphrase at the start of each video, he looks calmly into the camera for good eye (camera) contact, etc. Zukunftsmusik as they say ;)
All that aside, congrats on your first video, a brave move to make, and I wish you lots of success in the future. Ill look forward to the next one.
im not hearing a big difference. in future videos, dont stop and talk over the switching back and forth between FX and NOFX. its hard to pick up on the difference it makes when you stop the music and announce it and then start it back up again. just switch back and forth so people can hear the change.
Are you paying him to make his videos? In future If you want to ask a favour you say ‘ please’. Learn some manners.
@@TheExtremenarcissist you say please if you must but he doesn't have too AND he is 100% correct - you are annoying.
@@montyrayza7220 Unless you’re paying somebody to do something you don’t make demands, you make polite suggestions. Obviously both you and the author of OG post are entitled pricks.
Nice video! I think the Behringer wins this, because its handles sonic balance little bit better than the plugin!
Would love to see blind test with these. Its very subtle. I thought the HW had a bit more punch but it could be down to settings & quite possible my imagination. I personally don't see the point of HW when we have such good plugins these days.
The blind test is up. Watch Part III.
have to say - prefer the plugin. has more upper mids saturation. i´m getting my stam audio 609 mk2 in 3 weeks yay
Congratulations for uploading your first video!
Never thought I'd see a piece of hardware get outperformed by a plugin. I don't want to be overly negative, but too many corners have been cut for this Behringer unit to deliver the goods in any meaningful way (and that KT label gives me a really good idea of who else was involved, which explains why it sounds so bad). It doesn't have the same components as more expensive diode bridge compressors, so it's never going to sound anything like a 33609. Not even close.
Where the corners has been cut ?
The only obvius difference that can alter the sound with the revision C is the transformers.
That is your opinion and It's far from the reality until proven otherwise.
The Behringer version handles the transients in a much more pleasing way. The UAD one sounds like all software compressors do, super grabby in a not pleasing way.
It compresses ok, but what are those Midas transformers like when you push into them?
In Part III I gave it a push.
Is it me or sound examples were better sounding before any processing?)( uad and behringer took away some definition; drum loop were amazing by itself!)
I'd like to hear it with a drum mix which wasn't totally slammed with compression and sounding fat already.
are the release/attack times really the same between both comparisons?
Yes
Yes. The release stage in the 369 is a bit different as I explain in Part III.
@@christophk3078 i run to watch part iii
Holy Subscription Cancellation! Sounds Great
Because it is 2024 it would make sense to do a A/B/C comparison since that is what this is: Dry, UAC, Behringer. Without chit-chat in between to make sure the tonality of ones memory remains in-tact between the 3 states. Also have parallel spectral analyses of the 3 states.
Simply hoping someone notices it perceptually is very prone to placebo.. like asking if someone is listening to mp3, flac, cassette, or vinyl in a blind test. for the truly precise individual (the one who should actually care about whether or not something was recreated or is perfect, if it makes a difference at all) they should be capable of demonstrating that instead of talking about it like it's 1970 and people are supposed to sit there and nod and agree. It starts to come across more like they are practicing for some kind of audio-visual marketing role years from now. or practicing english (forgive me, but, you can always write a script, practice it, and do it multiple times, especially someone specializing in audio haha)
Kind of the point though. If you can’t pick out the differences without all of that extra information, then the differences likely don’t matter.
@@JordonBeal Because we are not in 1984 - it is very very simple to lock the input sample, chop it precisely at where it begins, invert its signal and subtract it from A-B, A-C, and so forth to prove that differences are actually being made. I'm just saying that the general technical game of people reviewing hardware is often probably 40 years behind technologically, even though they use cutting edge at-your-fingertips platforms to give this dated content to consumers to potentially drive purchase choice. Combine that with anyone who talks over the audio (that's like someone giving visual tech demonstrations and putting their head in the way of the screen while talking about whatever its showing) and it just gets kind of annoying. However, if this device is good, then fantastic. I didn't catch any single extremes being tested for it or anything... just the look of the meters on the physical device, clicking on/off... and all that. and this happens everywhere, lol.. all of the things I just complained about.
So I understand the Behringer is sold out for months to come?
the behringer sounds better than the plugin. cool.
Mid Side Tweeker !! in a blind comparison you couldn't tell them apart, shame we couldn't here Neve in the mix !
The UAD one clearly kills the low-end transients. On the other hand, comparison of the Behringer to the original Neve makes the Behringer sound like a plugin! 😅😅