Obergefell v. Hodges (2015): Supreme Court Cases Series | Academy 4 Social Change

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @semoraward8086
    @semoraward8086 Рік тому +1

    Studying for a final and this video is tremendously helpful! Thanks for the work you do!

    • @cameronchurchill2749
      @cameronchurchill2749 Рік тому

      I agree, great to have some content to listen to as well as read. Great work.

  • @forestmanification
    @forestmanification Рік тому +2

    "Think Further" question :
    Same sex couple is not an entity, it has no rights, the individual has. The person that engages in sexual activity with the same sex had the same access and rights as I did, I could not marry a person of the same sex, neither could they, we had equal rights because as a matter of fact, we are the same in the manner that we are both only exclusively sexually compatible with the opposite sex, that is part of the human identity. To think that we did not have equality is lunacy and also means that we still do not have it since I cannot marry my car, I do not have car-human couple "essential" rights therefore this is bad? Pure intellectualized lunacy. This proves that the justices that voted for this are either too incompetent to hold their judge position or they are corrupted, and since the latest nomination could not even answer the simple question of "what is a woman", this is definitely a case of corruption, nobody can brag about being a black woman judge and then not know what a woman is, and corruption at that level should land you in prison.

    • @hgu
      @hgu 9 місяців тому +1

      what is bro yapping about

    • @RyanFeatherston
      @RyanFeatherston 8 місяців тому +1

      Welcome to Strawman Airlines.

    • @dearantsally9915
      @dearantsally9915 7 місяців тому +1

      @@hgu it was an intellect reasoning. Waaaayyyyy over your head.