Brother SIRAAJ conveys the DAWAH so profoundly and proffesionally knowledgeable respectfully TRUE GEM to the UMMAH may ALLAH SWT PROTECT and PRESERVE brother Siraj INSHA ALLAH AMEEN
Siraj is bringing a very good perspective here, Jesus the fully man didn't preach trinity. He never explained,talked about trinity. The disciples never asked him such a question.
meanwhile in holy book of islam, Anas said : A man asked : where is my father, Messenger of Allah? He replied! Your father is in Hell. When he turned his back, he said : My father and your father are in Hell. حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادٌ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، قَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَيْنَ أَبِي قَالَ " أَبُوكَ فِي النَّارِ " . فَلَمَّا قَفَّى قَالَ " إِنَّ أَبِي وَأَبَاكَ فِي النَّارِ " . Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani) what a family of profit moe!!! who is this slave of al lah in hell fire? who is this al lah of his father, Abdullah ibn Abdul-Muttalib? al lah said these is my seal of profit. WOW what a hahalala religiom!!!! who is this pagan god, al lah of his father?
@@seekeith2 There is no way you're serious 😂 how you gonna say holy book of muslim and then not quote the qur'an, argument sake let me forget that you lack knowledge in the basics of Islam, yes the father of the prophet died as a kaffir, as a disbeliever, he was a pagan. and you probably asking how is he called Abdullah and die as a kaffir, that's because he did shirk, Allah just means the ultimate the one true God however they worshipped little Gods beside him, the seal of prophets came to destroy this corruption and told them to worship Allah only. Mecca was filled with pagan worship mixed with truthfulness, and before you say oh then Allah is a pagan God, Rabbis during the time of the prophet were called Abdullah for example Abdullah ibn Salam, he was a jewish rabbi called Abdullah. Get your facts straight Seekeith
@@Japan_Savari If you are a righteous person, you are a god (means godly person). But, in case of the almighty God, you need to open the dictionary to know the definition.
This guy thinks smiling will convince ppl he has confidence in his argument but it’s actually to hide his embarrassment. Siraj showed him mercy by letting many of his misstatements go by unchallenged when many Christians themselves would dispute this guy.
According to the Bible Siraj made the best and clearest explanation about the Trinity that most common Christians misunderstood because they don't read and were deceived by Pastors who try to hide the truth from them. Bro. Siraj was quite flexible, he allowed the Arab Christian to express and explain his beliefs freely. Yet, he failed miserably because his answers did not tally with the Bible or Jesus' words. Therefore, this debate serves as an eye-opener and reminder to Christians who are unaware of what they blindly follow. It is also worth noting the young Muslim man's honesty in quoting the Bible correctly and making it easy for Christians to reflect and understand.
Easy way christians confuse people is by saying one can't understand trinity, else your filled with holy spirit. Yet, their definition is different from the next Christian.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
The guy didn't answer Siraj's questions, he gave him almost 5 minutes, he also gave him many chances, he wanted to divert the topic and he started preaching Christianity, the brother never wanted that so he had to get him to the topic
We know the Christians have problem to justify Jesus as God. But Siraj should give this christian man chance to tell all the lies and not to cut in the middle of his story. Bro Siraj should listen and think quickly what to counter attack his point once he has finished talking rather than keep asking him questions and refuting him. Bro Siraj should always be patient and learn to listen and not too demanding coz people will lose interest to discuss with him. Discipline is important in a good discussion or else it will turn up be commotion.
Brother Siraj gave him enough time to respond but he didn't answer anything.. I don't understand what you talking about, he gave him once almost 5 minutes
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
He keeps saying do not devide and later he says everything he does is by the virtue of his humanity, his devinity disappeared out of the equation suddenly!
The difference between Siraj and the christian man is that Siraj quotes verses from bible and bases his words on bible verses but the christian man making up explanations without dependency on what the bible says nor any relations to the verses. It's hard to call him christian when he opposes his own bible and tries to refute the bible verses with his own made up understanding. It's inevitable Devil whispers through him when he shuts his eyes and thumbs his ears.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
@@ia6980 No logic, no proof, only emotional barking. A mortal flesh, eating, drinking, micturating and defaecating can't be the God who was killed naked on cross by his own(?) creations.
Christianity started , since more than 2000 years ago . Jesus loves the whole world and he wants everyone to know him experience his love , God bless you all .
Dude 1- hey you owe me 10 grand Dude 2- sorry dude i can't afford to pay it. Dude 1- its ok dude no need to pay, i take 10 grand from my son to pay your debt. The son : seriously Dad ? us humans : we didn't ask for that to happens
The poor holy spirit got scammed and always left behind. John 1 1 holy spirit missing Matthew 24 36 holy spirit is missing John 10 30 holy spirit is missing. This is why you will never ever find the trinity anywhere in the bible. (These 3 are 1 god)
The creator is only one, don't worship the creation my dear brother. Feel sorry for all the Christians. May Allah SWT guide them to the straight path and give them hidayah.
Notice how most Christians (& some jews n disbelievers) always have little smirks and smiles and laughing trying to mock, plus the “MY GOD” insinuating God is only for them. You don’t see this as often with Muslims. And I come from a Christian background. My parents & family are Christian. Imagine how hard it is to have to hide my prayers my prayer mat my the little head thing we wear idk what it’s called lol. Because it would be as if I betrayed my whole family… one day I will confront them but I’m not ready yet…
because Siraaj is talking no sense since the initial. Siraaj said that Christians believe Jesus is the Father, then he afirm that Jesus was god after 33 years old and not before. Muslims behaviour is more violent in the other side in the park.
THE MUSLIMS QUESTION DID JESUS WORSHIP THE HOLY SPIRIT IS A FALSE DILEMMA IN THE QUESTION ASSUMES the being of Yahweh is separated when it’s not also he’s forgetting Jesus taught people to worship the Holy Spirit! Matthew 28
Do not associate partners with Allah If the sun can literally exist and we know it to be a planet like body that is on fire, then fear the hell-fire. أعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم Transliteration: Auzubillah minashaitan nirajeem Translation: “I seek refuge in Allah from the outcast Shaitan”.
Yes, Siraj needs to learn more about deen before debating with Christians. Our brothers giving Da’wa need to be more educated in order to do Da’wa. I’m sorry, but speakers corner has people who don’t have enough information to do it. They should learn more before giving Da’wa in my humble opinion. At least that is what I’ve learnt.
@@bannedone3ice138hey stop taqiyah and stop waffling.. Brother Siraj and brother Raihan are friends but you devils 😈 are the enemy and pretending to be good but have Christians mind games 😢
@@ax3226 I don't think they are Muslims, Christians play this kind of mind games, they are pretending to cause problems between brother Raihan and brother Siraj ..
Brothers from speaker corner just mark this christian man. Is the same christian that was discussing Hamza on a previous video he just don't want to talk the Bible or his own believe. Now he's doing again repeating the question that brother Siraj already answered. Just keep in mind this christian man pretending he's a friend man
The Arab Christian is badly shaken and one can easily see his futility and frustration as he manages to manipulate by dodging and hesitating to respond to the vital question and point to the shaky God he believes in. He acted defensively when affronted with hard, physical, undeniable proof by Bro. Siraj. You can see his face become red and his voice faltering, he no longer talks calmly after he was trapped and failed to answer. It is such a skill that they keep on telling bad lies thinking they can fool someone possessing more knowledge on the topic.
The Arab christian wasted the valuable time of brother Hamza last week by asking irrelevant question in order to avoid discussing theology. This time Siraj demystified him but surely Siraj needs to refine his dawah approach!
@@SadeqKaramah I earlier said he is doing good but as we grow in our job we get better. 1. Less interruptions especially to the opponent 2. Language as English is not our mother language. My little advice and I must say he Siraj scared the so called "clever" Coptic. Kind regards
@@ahy7181 When your enemy is going to talk forever and throw a lot of lies, he is making use of your Dawah Video without giving you a chance to respond. They say experience makes perfect. (Muslim brothers are giving dawah in the Park for many years and they know what they are doing). There are moments when you apply brakes when the debate is leading nowhere. They are talking in simple English that is understood by all. Whoever is feeling insecure or scared should not debate. Dawah is not to please people but guide them to the truth.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
regarding being sinless in the bible Zechariah and Elizabeth the parents of John the Baptist were described as that they kept all the laws : Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly. (Luke 1 : 6) John the Baptist himself was described as having the Holy Spirit even before he was born : for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.(Luke 1 : 15)
Know the reasons, Bart Ehrman left Christianity? ==== Bible scholar Bart Ehrman began his studies at the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago. Originally an evangelical Christian, Ehrman believed that the Bible was the inerrant word of God. But later, as a student at Princeton Theological Seminary, Ehrman started reading the Bible with a more historical approach and analyzing contradictions in the Gospels. Ehrman, the author of Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don't Know About Them), tells Terry Gross that he discourages readers from "smash[ing] the four Gospels into one big Gospel and think[ing] that [they] get the true understanding." "When Matthew was writing, he didn't intend for somebody ... to interpret his Gospel in light of what some other author said. He had his own message," Ehrman says. To illustrate the differences between the Gospels, Ehrman offers opposing depictions of Jesus talking about himself. In the book of John, Jesus talks about himself and proclaims who he is, saying "I am the bread of life." Whereas in Mark, Jesus teaches principally about the coming kingdom and hardly ever mentions himself directly. These differences offer clues into the perspectives of the authors, and the eras in which they wrote their respective Gospels, according to Ehrman. "In Mark's Gospel, Jesus is not interested in teaching about himself. But when you read John's Gospel, that's virtually the only thing Jesus talks about is who he is, what his identity is, where he came from," Ehrman says. "This is completely unlike anything that you find in Mark or in Matthew and Luke. And historically it creates all sorts of problems, because if the historical Jesus actually went around saying that he was God, it's very hard to believe that Matthew, Mark and Luke left out that part - you know, as if that part wasn't important to mention. But in fact, they don't mention it. And so this view of the divinity of Jesus on his own lips is found only in our latest Gospel, the Gospel of John." Chapter Four Students taking a college-level Bible course for the first time often find it surprising that we don't know who wrote most of the books of the New Testament. How could that be? Don't these books all have the authors' names attached to them? Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, the letters of Paul, 1 and 2 Peter, and 1, 2 and 3 John? How could the wrong names be attached to books of Scripture? Isn't this the Word of God? If someone wrote a book claiming to be Paul while knowing full well that he wasn't Paul - isn't that lying? Can Scripture contain lies? When I arrived at seminary I was fully armed and ready for the onslaught on my faith by liberal biblical scholars who were going to insist on such crazy ideas. Having been trained in conservative circles, I knew that these views were standard fare at places like Princeton Theological Seminary. But what did they know? Bunch of liberals. What came as a shock to me over time was just how little actual evidence there is for the traditional ascriptions of authorship that I had always taken for granted, and how much real evidence there was that many of these ascriptions are wrong. It turned out the liberals actually had something to say and had evidence to back it up; they weren't simply involved in destructive wishful thinking. There were some books, such as the Gospels, that had been written anonymously, only later to be ascribed to certain authors who probably did not write them (apostles and friends of the apostles). Other books were written by authors who flat out claimed to be someone they weren't. In this chapter I'd like to explain what that evidence is.
Who Wrote The Gospels? Though it is evidently not the sort of thing pastors normally tell their congregations, for over a century there has been a broad consensus among scholars that many of the books of the New Testament were not written by the people whose names are attached to them. So if that is the case, who did write them? Preliminary Observations: The Gospels as Eyewitness Accounts As we have just seen, the Gospels are filled with discrepancies large and small. Why are there so many differences among the four Gospels? These books are called Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John because they were traditionally thought to have been written by Matthew, a disciple who was a tax collector; John, the "Beloved Disciple" mentioned in the Fourth Gospel; Mark, the secretary of the disciple Peter; and Luke, the traveling companion of Paul. These traditions can be traced back to about a century after the books were written. But if Matthew and John were both written by earthly disciples of Jesus, why are they so very different, on all sorts of levels? Why do they contain so many contradictions? Why do they have such fundamentally different views of who Jesus was? In Matthew, Jesus comes into being when he is conceived, or born, of a virgin; in John, Jesus is the incarnate Word of God who was with God in the beginning and through whom the universe was made. In Matthew, there is not a word about Jesus being God; in John, that's precisely who he is. In Matthew, Jesus teaches about the coming kingdom of God and almost never about himself (and never that he is divine); in John, Jesus teaches almost exclusively about himself, especially his divinity. In Matthew, Jesus refuses to perform miracles in order to prove his identity; in John, that is practically the only reason he does miracles. Did two of the earthly followers of Jesus really have such radically different understandings of who he was? It is possible. Two people who served in the administration of George W. Bush may well have radically different views about him (although I doubt anyone would call him divine). This raises an important methodological point that I want to stress before discussing the evidence for the authorship of the Gospels. Why did the tradition eventually arise that these books were written by apostles and companions of the apostles? In part it was in order to assure readers that they were written by eyewitnesses and companions of eyewitnesses. An eyewitness could be trusted to relate the truth of what actually happened in Jesus' life. But the reality is that eyewitnesses cannot be trusted to give historically accurate accounts. They never could be trusted and can't be trusted still. If eyewitnesses always gave historically accurate accounts, we would have no need for law courts. If we needed to find out what actually happened when a crime was committed, we could just ask someone. Real-life legal cases require multiple eyewitnesses, because eyewitnesses' testimonies differ. If two eyewitnesses in a court of law were to differ as much as Matthew and John, imagine how hard it would be to reach a judgment.
A further reality is that all the Gospels were written anonymously, and none of the writers claims to be an eyewitness. Names are attached to the titles of the Gospels ("the Gospel according to Matthew"), but these titles are later additions to the Gospels, provided by editors and scribes to inform readers who the editors thought were the authorities behind the different versions. That the titles are not original to the Gospels themselves should be clear upon some simple reflection. Whoever wrote Matthew did not call it "The Gospel according to Matthew." The persons who gave it that title are telling you who, in their opinion, wrote it. Authors never title their books "according to." Moreover, Matthew's Gospel is written completely in the third person, about what "they" - Jesus and the disciples - were doing, never about what "we" - Jesus and the rest of us - were doing. Even when this Gospel narrates the event of Matthew being called to become a disciple, it talks about "him," not about "me." Read the account for yourself (Matthew 9:9). There's not a thing in it that would make you suspect the author is talking about himself. With John it is even more clear. At the end of the Gospel the author says of the "Beloved Disciple": "This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true" (John 21:24). Note how the author differentiates between his source of information, "the disciple who testifies," and himself: "we know that his testimony is true." He/we: this author is not the disciple. He claims to have gotten some of his information from the disciple. As for the other Gospels, Mark was said to be not a disciple but a companion of Peter, and Luke was a companion of Paul, who also was not a disciple. Even if they had been disciples, it would not guarantee the objectivity or truthfulness of their stories. But in fact none of the writers was an eyewitness, and none of them claims to be. Who, then, wrote these books?
Stop waddling and pretending !! This sounds Christians mind games . Go bark elsewhere, why would he listent irrelevant speech, which is got nothing to do with his questions ? Let the logic work...
Yah that's right. He never answered a single question that Siraj asks him. I think there's no point to discuss this christian guy with the brothers from speaker corner cos it's just wasted of time. Now he's been marked
Lets look at scripture,,, Mathews Testament says; yielded up His spirit. Mark accounts; With a loud cry, Jesus breathed his last. Luke; he breathed his last. John says; he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. So where this is from, I don't know... its a Strawman! .... Mr Robertson says below Siraj is charismatic yes and? , So is Satan. Truth and charm are not Synonymous.
There are many verses in the Bible where it says that Jesus is God, and where Jesus spoke of Himself as One higher than prophets, and before Abraham was "I AM" Scriptures are filled with writings that say over and over and over that Jesus is God that came in the flesh. That is why He was crucified because He was making Himself Equal to God. This Siraj, knows all these verses, but on purpose, convolutes, twists, manipulating Holy Scriptures, to spread his lie and to keep people away from truth. Truth is in Jesus Christ. When Jesus disciple asked Jesus "show us the Father and it is sufficient to us" Jesus answer, so much time I AM with you and you still dont know ME? WHOEVER SEEN ME, SEEN THE FATHER! Sins of man kind, can only be forgiven by blood, thats the requirement of Allah. You have no blood? You have no forgiveness!! Only blood Allah the Father will accept is the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ
SAm Dawah has many errors. Christians do not believe that Jesus is the Father. Jesus did not need to claim divinity before starting his ministry. Is the same to ask why the Quran was not sent before. Christians do not believe that Jesus was not God before 33, many inconsistencies.
Mina you tried to debate every one at speakers corner but get smashed every time, you should read the Qur'an with an open mind and heart and you'll find the Truth 🤲
Alhamdulillah you got him brother drop the mic and his face bro allahu Akbar allahu Akbar come on let me see you smile why do Christians keep doing this to yourself knowing that the book that you have even by your own scholars even by your own high scholars 50 of them talked about how these books are all corrupted that we cannot put trust on this for all salvation for all eternity on the day of judgment what is this tell you Christians come to Islam you want to be safe you want to go to paradise come to Islam take your shahada repent to God take your shahada and worship the one true God Allah Allah stop fooling yourself you cannot fool God you will be in the hellfire what is this what you guys want to do go to the hellfire you know if you partner anyone to a law or two to the one true God which is Allah Elohim it's still Allah swt stop playing with us Muslims cuz we walk with the truth we are in the straight path we are guaranteed Paradise even if we go to the hellfire eventually all the Muslims will be taken out of the hellfire and what comes in the grave before that day it's even worse they both bad even in the grave before you get the judgment Day
Quran is the speech of Allah here he has given all human being, the assurance and ordered us all to follow his words which will guide us to the truth and the whole truth. =========== The Opening of Chapter 2:1-5. =========== (2:1) Alif, Lam, Mim.1 1. The names of letters of the Arabic alphabet, called huruf muqatta'at, occur at the beginning of several surahs of the Qur'an. At the time of the Qur'anic revelation the use of such letters was a well-known literary device, used by both poets and orators, and we find several instances in the pre-Islamic Arabic literature that has come down to us. Since the muqatta'at were commonly used the Arabs of that period generally knew what they meant and so they did not present a puzzle. We do not notice, therefore, any contemporaries of the Prophet (peace be on him) raising objections against the Qur'an on the ground that the letters at the beginning of some of its surahs were absurd. For the same reason no Tradition has come down to us of any Companion asking the Prophet about the significance of the muqatta'at. Later on this literary device gradually fell into disuse and hence it became difficult for commentators to determine their precise meanings. It is obvious, however, that deriving right guidance from the Qur'an does not depend on grasping the meaning of these vocables, and that anyone who fails to understand them may still live a righteous life and attain salvation. The ordinary reader, therefore, need not delve too deeply into this matter. (2:2) This is the Book of Allah, there is no doubt in it;2 it is a guidance for the pious,3 2. One obvious meaning of this verse is that this Book, the Qur'an, is undoubtedly from God. Another possible meaning is that nothing contained in it can be subject to doubt. Books which deal with supernatural questions, with matters that lie beyond the range of sense perception, are invariably based on conjecture and their authors, despite their brave show of competence, are therefore not immune from a degree of scepticism regarding their statements. This Book, which is based wholly on Truth, a Book which is the work of none other than the All-Knowing God Himself is distinguishable from all other books. Hence, there is no room for doubt about its contents despite the hesitation some people might express either through ignorance or folly. 3. This means that while the Book is potentially for all, only those who possess certain qualities can benefit from it. The first such quality is piety: those who want to benefit should be disposed to distinguish between good and evil, and to shun evil and do good. Those who lead an animal existence, who never to consider whether their actions are either good or bad, whose cynically follow the prevailing winds, who are helplessly tossed about by the animal desires that dominate their minds, such persons are all together incapable of deriving any benefit from the guidance embodied in the Qur'an. (2:3) for those who believe in the existence of that which is beyond the reach of perception,4 who establish Prayer5 and spend out of what We have provided them,6 4. This is the second prerequisite for deriving benefit from the Qur'an. Ghayb signifies the verities which are hidden from man's senses and which are beyond the scope of man's ordinary observation and experience, for example the existence and attributes of God, the angels. the process of revelation, Paradise, Hell and so on. 'Belief in the ghaib' means having faith in such matters, based on an absolute confidence in the Messengers of God and despite the fact that it is impossible to experience them. According to this verse, Qur'anic guidance can prove helpful only to those prepared to affirm the truths of the suprasensory realm. People who make their belief in these questions conditional upon sensory perception of the object of belief, and who are not prepared even to consider the possibility of the existence of things that cannot be weighed or measured, cannot profit from this Book. 5. This is the third requirement. It is pointed out that those to whom belief means merely the pronouncement of a formula, who think that a mere verbal confession of faith is enough and that it makes no practical demands on them, can derive no guidance from the Qur'an. To benefit from the Qur'an it is essential that a man's decision to believe should be followed immediately by practical obedience to God. Prayer is the first and continuing sign of practical obedience. No more than a few hours can pass after a man has embraced Islam than the mu'adhin calls to Prayer and it becomes evident whether or not the profession of faith has been genuine. Moreover, the mu'adhin calls to Prayer five times every day and whenever a man fails to respond to his call it becomes clear that he has transgressed the bounds of practical obedience. An abandonment of Prayer amounts to an abandonment of obedience. Obviously, if a man is not prepared to follow the directives of his guide, it is immaterial whether or not true guidance is available to him. It should also be noted that the expression 'establishment of Prayer' has a wider meaning than mere performance of Prayer. It means that the system of Prayer should be organized on a collective basis. If there is a person in a locality who prays individually but no arrangements are made for congregational Prayer, it cannot be claimed that Prayer is established in that locality. 6. This, the fourth prerequisite for a person to benefit from the Qur'an, demands that the person concerned should neither be niggardly nor a worshipper of money. On the contrary, he should be willing to pay the claims on his property of both God and man, and should not flinch from making financial sacrifices for the sake of his convictions. (2:4) who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed before you,7 and have firm faith in the Hereafter.8 7. The fifth requirement is that one should believe in the Books revealed by God to His Prophets in the various ages and regions of the world, in the Book revealed to Muhammad (peace be on him) as well as in those revealed to the other Prophets who preceded him. The door of the Qur'an is closed to all those who do not consider it necessary for man to receive guidance from God. It is also closed to those who, even if they believe in the need for such guidance, do not consider it necessary to seek it through the channel of revelation and prophethood, but would rather weave their own set of ideas and concepts and regard them as equivalent to Divine Guidance. This door is also closed to those who believe in Divine books as such, but confine this belief to those books accepted by their forefathers, and spurn Divine Guidance revealed to anyone born beyond their own racial and national boundaries. The Qur'an excludes all such people and is prepared to open the source of its grace only to those who believe that mankind does require Divine Guidance, who acknowledge that this guidance does not come to people individually but reaches them through Prophets and Divine Books and who are not given to racial or national chauvinism but are devotees of Truth alone, and are therefore prepared to submit to Divine Guidance wherever it be found. 8. Belief in the After-life is the sixth and last requirement. The term al-Akhirah embraces a whole set of ideas: (i) that man is not an irresponsible being, but is answerable to God for all his conduct in this world; (ii) that the present order of the world is not timeless, but will come to an end at an appointed hour known only to God; (iii) that when this world comes to an end God will bring into being another world in which He will resurrect, at one and the same moment, all the human beings ever born on earth. He will gather them together, examine their conduct and grant each one just reward for his actions; (iv) that those who are accounted good in God's judgement will be sent to Heaven, and those judged by Him as evil-doers will be consigned to Hell; (v) that the real measure of success and failure is not one's prosperity in the present life, but one's success or failure according to God's judgement in the Next. Those who do not accept this set of beliefs can derive no benefit from the Qur'an. For if a man is merely in a state of doubt and hesitation with regard to these matters - let alone disbelieving them - he cannot advance even one step forward along the path charted out by the Qur'an. (2:5) Such are on true guidance from their Lord; such are the truly successful.
Enjoy watching Siraj! Our young Muslim Brother and very charismatic!
All Praise Due to Allah! 🤲🏿
جزاكم الله خيرا
Brother SIRAAJ conveys the DAWAH so profoundly and proffesionally knowledgeable respectfully TRUE GEM to the UMMAH may ALLAH SWT PROTECT and PRESERVE brother Siraj INSHA ALLAH AMEEN
Allahumma aamin, same to you too dear sister 🤲
Siraaj is talking no sense.... since the initial....Christians do not believe that Jesus is the Father.
@@luissalazar6960 Do you believe Jesus is God? If yes, who is the God of Jesus ? And who is your God?
If you ask 10 Christians, they will give you 15 different interpretations of god.
You're lying.
If you ask muslims anything they are so full of themselves they give self assured answers judging others
@@ia6980 No he's not.
@@Paul_RydeWe answers all question regards to Islam from Al Quran and Hadiths..
@@josantai2691 I have zero questions concerning islam or its views I AM absolutely convinced Jesus Christ is Savior and Redeemer
Excellent. we pray to who Jesus's prayed to God. so he is not God. God is immortal.
Siraj is bringing a very good perspective here, Jesus the fully man didn't preach trinity. He never explained,talked about trinity. The disciples never asked him such a question.
every Christian has his own explanation
😂😂
I love Siraj's style. He's a genius!!
He's funny and makes good points lol
Same Alhamdulillah
meanwhile in holy book of islam,
Anas said :
A man asked : where is my father, Messenger of Allah? He replied! Your father is in Hell. When he turned his back, he said : My father and your father are in Hell.
حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادٌ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، قَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَيْنَ أَبِي قَالَ " أَبُوكَ فِي النَّارِ " . فَلَمَّا قَفَّى قَالَ " إِنَّ أَبِي وَأَبَاكَ فِي النَّارِ " .
Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani)
what a family of profit moe!!!
who is this slave of al lah in hell fire?
who is this al lah of his father, Abdullah ibn Abdul-Muttalib?
al lah said these is my seal of profit.
WOW what a hahalala religiom!!!!
who is this pagan god, al lah of his father?
@@seekeith2 There is no way you're serious 😂 how you gonna say holy book of muslim and then not quote the qur'an, argument sake let me forget that you lack knowledge in the basics of Islam, yes the father of the prophet died as a kaffir, as a disbeliever, he was a pagan. and you probably asking how is he called Abdullah and die as a kaffir, that's because he did shirk, Allah just means the ultimate the one true God however they worshipped little Gods beside him, the seal of prophets came to destroy this corruption and told them to worship Allah only. Mecca was filled with pagan worship mixed with truthfulness, and before you say oh then Allah is a pagan God, Rabbis during the time of the prophet were called Abdullah for example Abdullah ibn Salam, he was a jewish rabbi called Abdullah. Get your facts straight Seekeith
@@FightGreats was not quran is hadith, my friend?
Just for the record
In Islam all the prophets are sinless as well
Go get them 😂mashaAllah for this brother
The father is in heaven.
Jesus the god/human on earth.
One god in heaven,on god one earth= 2 godss
Masha Allah, Siraj is growing into an excellent debater, showing more patience. Keep it up my brother
Hes making a foolof himself
One nature in 2 nature. This is a new one.
Jesus said " I and my father are one."
Jesus also said " As I and my father are one, you the disciples are also one with us."
I am confused. I am also god. And you to bro
@@Japan_Savari
If you are a righteous person, you are a god (means godly person).
But, in case of the almighty God, you need to open the dictionary to know the definition.
This guy thinks smiling will convince ppl he has confidence in his argument but it’s actually to hide his embarrassment.
Siraj showed him mercy by letting many of his misstatements go by unchallenged when many Christians themselves would dispute this guy.
According to the Bible Siraj made the best and clearest explanation about the Trinity that most common Christians misunderstood because they don't read and were deceived by Pastors who try to hide the truth from them. Bro. Siraj was quite flexible, he allowed the Arab Christian to express and explain his beliefs freely. Yet, he failed miserably because his answers did not tally with the Bible or Jesus' words. Therefore, this debate serves as an eye-opener and reminder to Christians who are unaware of what they blindly follow. It is also worth noting the young Muslim man's honesty in quoting the Bible correctly and making it easy for Christians to reflect and understand.
Easy way christians confuse people is by saying one can't understand trinity, else your filled with holy spirit. Yet, their definition is different from the next Christian.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Siraj needs to listen more.
The guy didn't answer Siraj's questions, he gave him almost 5 minutes, he also gave him many chances, he wanted to divert the topic and he started preaching Christianity, the brother never wanted that so he had to get him to the topic
The christian guy was the one who didnt answer none of the siraj's questions lol
The blue shirt guy thought he was smart…. But made a fool of himself!
We know the Christians have problem to justify Jesus as God.
But Siraj should give this christian man chance to tell all the lies and not to cut in the middle of his story.
Bro Siraj should listen and think quickly what to counter attack his point once he has finished talking rather than keep asking him questions and refuting him.
Bro Siraj should always be patient and learn to listen and not too demanding coz people will lose interest to discuss with him.
Discipline is important in a good discussion or else it will turn up be commotion.
Brother Siraj gave him enough time to respond but he didn't answer anything.. I don't understand what you talking about, he gave him once almost 5 minutes
Everyone's else comment is positive, only yours.. 🤭
When christians can't answer they just go on preaching mode.
Holy ghost is ignored child of the family of Gods 😅
shaitani is a never ignored companion of more mad.
@rashid 😂😂😂👌🏼
He's the Q+ in this multiple pronoun community
This guy: you can not tell me what I believe.
The church: excommunicated 😂
Excommunicado .
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
Islam the of life... Tq bro dawah
Blue shirt is confused 😂😂😂
Let' learns simple true basic of Christianity.....by siraj
Barack Allahu feek....
Christian by like: Forget the Bible. My own interpretation is valid.😂😂
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
❤
Luke 2:21
Circumcised
WHO circumcised Jesus (PBUH)?
i hate ppl interfering on the discussion no respect.
longest 5 minutes i heard from this christian man.... with no answers.. want to run eh wait wait
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
next time don’t let him talk too much you’re the boss Siraj
Siraj looks like hes out of the latrine
This Christian will always gives Alotsa reason running away from questions they will go to another topic.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
@Siraj show them the verses brother. Don’t just quote them. We should do Da’wa in systematic manner. May Allah help us get gain knowledge. Ameen.
He red for them by heart, he knows the verses in his mind
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
He keeps saying do not devide and later he says everything he does is by the virtue of his humanity, his devinity disappeared out of the equation suddenly!
It's a sad joke w them. It's one nature but two natures. They got their own definitions..
@@Mo-ym1wz There is no clear text backing up their belief, that's why you find every christian inventing his own version.
Every Christian creates their own logic to try to make sense of the Christian trinity
Christians are hard especially when they get stopped in their tracks
10 minutes were wasted by not listening without interruption -you have to learn to listen if your end goal is to be heard. Peace!
I feel sorry for Christians who have to defend Trinity. Obviously they cannot and then they start word gymnastics.
Christian wasn't stuck. Scrappy just didn't listen and allow him to talk.
Christians got constipated by a simple question 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The difference between Siraj and the christian man is that Siraj quotes verses from bible and bases his words on bible verses but the christian man making up explanations without dependency on what the bible says nor any relations to the verses. It's hard to call him christian when he opposes his own bible and tries to refute the bible verses with his own made up understanding. It's inevitable Devil whispers through him when he shuts his eyes and thumbs his ears.
In the next life u can ask God urself if ur allowed ur sincerity is in question Mr Shirt !!!
He won't be coming again playing logic...Checkmate!
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
The trinitarian was trying to be smart, but became a goat.
Every trinitarian finally leaves the logic and talks emotionally.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
@@ia6980
No logic, no proof, only emotional barking. A mortal flesh, eating, drinking, micturating and defaecating can't be the God who was killed naked on cross by his own(?) creations.
Br Rehan... Respectfully stop interrupting be patient
Angels are different creations than Jesus.
If Jesus was a creation, then he can’t be the creator.
Christianity started , since more than 2000 years ago . Jesus loves the whole world and he wants everyone to know him experience his love , God bless you all .
2000 years ago who started this religion called Christianity?
Jesus never preached Christianity, Jesus didn’t even know Christianity
All you talk about is love, they guy didnt even tell you he was God and someone who loves doesn’t condemn children and babies to death
Different perspectives of claim.
Defence Jesus
Dude 1- hey you owe me 10 grand
Dude 2- sorry dude i can't afford to pay it.
Dude 1- its ok dude no need to pay, i take 10 grand from my son to pay your debt.
The son : seriously Dad ?
us humans : we didn't ask for that to happens
😅
Didn't you know that the man's son is Bill Gates?😜
Nailed it 😂
So "my God and your God" is not the same as "our God"?
According to this Christian guy is not the same 😮
YOU CANT QUESTION ALLAH SWT BE REALISTIC COMMON SENSE ALLAH SWT CAN CHOOSE WHOEVER HE PLEASES NOT FOR US TO QUESTION
These Christians are all runners 🤣🤣🤣
The fake smiling and laughing needs to be called out. It's so telling and irritating.
Typical christian he wants yo run away 🤣 i really wanted brother Siraj not to stop him.let him run away
siraj please don't argue with stupid people. Time worst for all 😁
The poor holy spirit got scammed and always left behind.
John 1 1 holy spirit missing
Matthew 24 36 holy spirit is missing
John 10 30 holy spirit is missing.
This is why you will never ever find the trinity anywhere in the bible.
(These 3 are 1 god)
Jesus sit at d right hand of mighty God..where is holy spirit?
@@omed4873hes invincible 😂😂😂 and his seat is also invisible
All the profits of God are sinless every every single one of them
Thank god for Islam
The creator is only one, don't worship the creation my dear brother. Feel sorry for all the Christians. May Allah SWT guide them to the straight path and give them hidayah.
Them lost Ethiopians snickering lol go read your book
Notice how most Christians (& some jews n disbelievers) always have little smirks and smiles and laughing trying to mock, plus the “MY GOD” insinuating God is only for them. You don’t see this as often with Muslims. And I come from a Christian background. My parents & family are Christian. Imagine how hard it is to have to hide my prayers my prayer mat my the little head thing we wear idk what it’s called lol. Because it would be as if I betrayed my whole family… one day I will confront them but I’m not ready yet…
because Siraaj is talking no sense since the initial. Siraaj said that Christians believe Jesus is the Father, then he afirm that Jesus was god after 33 years old and not before. Muslims behaviour is more violent in the other side in the park.
Fully God, fully man like the LGBTQ.
THE MUSLIMS QUESTION DID JESUS WORSHIP THE HOLY SPIRIT IS A FALSE DILEMMA IN THE QUESTION ASSUMES the being of Yahweh is separated when it’s not also he’s forgetting Jesus taught people to worship the Holy Spirit!
Matthew 28
Did he just why would answer ur question? Omg this christian guy! He approached Siraj in the first place n now he's acting like this
We can say Jesus was Pure (مزكى/مطهر) but not sinless !!
Who is the God of Jesus?
Answer 😱
Brother until now there is no answer, they are waiting for the holy spirit to guide them
Do not associate partners with Allah
If the sun can literally exist and we know it to be a planet like body that is on fire, then fear the hell-fire.
أعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم
Transliteration:
Auzubillah minashaitan nirajeem
Translation:
“I seek refuge in Allah from the outcast Shaitan”.
Fully mango fully Apple 🤔
fully Samsung , fully I-phone🤦♂😂😂😂
You've been Bamboozled Hoodwinked and Mislead with this 2 nature's NONSENSE
Ask him was Jesus breath fed
Christianity and Hinduism have many same beliefs.
.... I AM ALSO PULY MAN ....... CHRISTIAIN BELIVE ALSO 14 GODS .........
All the prophets are sinless
siraj need to learn from reyhan how to deal with people
Yes, Siraj needs to learn more about deen before debating with Christians. Our brothers giving Da’wa need to be more educated in order to do Da’wa. I’m sorry, but speakers corner has people who don’t have enough information to do it. They should learn more before giving Da’wa in my humble opinion. At least that is what I’ve learnt.
@@bannedone3ice138hey stop taqiyah and stop waffling.. Brother Siraj and brother Raihan are friends but you devils 😈 are the enemy and pretending to be good but have Christians mind games 😢
@@bannedone3ice138both of you cannot handle brother Siraj about knowledge by the will of almighty God!! Fact!..
Brothers, don’t insult a brother doing Dawah! And Siraj has much knowledge!
@@ax3226 I don't think they are Muslims, Christians play this kind of mind games, they are pretending to cause problems between brother Raihan and brother Siraj ..
The brother is good but has language problems. That Coptic has been showing off his logic around rather than depending on biblical verses!!!
He pretend not to understand the question,,,and he also bring siraj here and there to avoid the qiestion
Not all christian says and believe jusus christ is God there is only one almighty God jehovah god
Allah is so perfect and correct when describing the attitude of stubborn kafirun.i.e. they dumb deaf and blind and they cant see (the truth.).
Brothers from speaker corner just mark this christian man. Is the same christian that was discussing Hamza on a previous video he just don't want to talk the Bible or his own believe. Now he's doing again repeating the question that brother Siraj already answered. Just keep in mind this christian man pretending he's a friend man
Where is the rest? Is there a part 2??
The guy left and then his fellows were still discussing with brother Siraj, you can see the other parts from same channel
The Arab Christian is badly shaken and one can easily see his futility and frustration as he manages to manipulate by dodging and hesitating to respond to the vital question and point to the shaky God he believes in. He acted defensively when affronted with hard, physical, undeniable proof by Bro. Siraj. You can see his face become red and his voice faltering, he no longer talks calmly after he was trapped and failed to answer. It is such a skill that they keep on telling bad lies thinking they can fool someone possessing more knowledge on the topic.
The Arab christian wasted the valuable time of brother Hamza last week by asking irrelevant question in order to avoid discussing theology. This time Siraj demystified him but surely Siraj needs to refine his dawah approach!
@@ahy7181 Siraj is doing fine, but if you have more experience in this field, please shed more light on how he can refine his Dawah approach?
@@SadeqKaramah
I earlier said he is doing good but as we grow in our job we get better.
1. Less interruptions especially to the opponent
2. Language as English is not our mother language.
My little advice and I must say he Siraj scared the so called "clever" Coptic.
Kind regards
@@ahy7181 When your enemy is going to talk forever and throw a lot of lies, he is making use of your Dawah Video without giving you a chance to respond. They say experience makes perfect. (Muslim brothers are giving dawah in the Park for many years and they know what they are doing). There are moments when you apply brakes when the debate is leading nowhere. They are talking in simple English that is understood by all. Whoever is feeling insecure or scared should not debate. Dawah is not to please people but guide them to the truth.
Siraj, the deceiver of mankind, that deceives those who don't know the truth of Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is God, before Him, knees of this sheik Siraj in last day will kneel and his lips will testify that Jesus is Lord. It is better to believe in Lord Jesus now, while grace is available, rather come to understanding when there will be no chance to accept and turn to Jesus.
regarding being sinless in the bible Zechariah and Elizabeth the parents of John the Baptist were described as that they kept all the laws :
Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, observing all the Lord’s commands and decrees blamelessly. (Luke 1 : 6)
John the Baptist himself was described as having the Holy Spirit even before he was born :
for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.(Luke 1 : 15)
How can u say it is over ur (human) understanding then proceed to give an understanding of god??????
You're implying just Jesus & her mother are sinless not the other messengers. Concentrate!
Look at his fingers. He is counting three Gods. Paganism.
Witches entered in the end
Know the reasons, Bart Ehrman left Christianity?
====
Bible scholar Bart Ehrman began his studies at the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago. Originally an evangelical Christian, Ehrman believed that the Bible was the inerrant word of God. But later, as a student at Princeton Theological Seminary, Ehrman started reading the Bible with a more historical approach and analyzing contradictions in the Gospels.
Ehrman, the author of Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don't Know About Them), tells Terry Gross that he discourages readers from "smash[ing] the four Gospels into one big Gospel and think[ing] that [they] get the true understanding."
"When Matthew was writing, he didn't intend for somebody ... to interpret his Gospel in light of what some other author said. He had his own message," Ehrman says.
To illustrate the differences between the Gospels, Ehrman offers opposing depictions of Jesus talking about himself. In the book of John, Jesus talks about himself and proclaims who he is, saying "I am the bread of life." Whereas in Mark, Jesus teaches principally about the coming kingdom and hardly ever mentions himself directly. These differences offer clues into the perspectives of the authors, and the eras in which they wrote their respective Gospels, according to Ehrman.
"In Mark's Gospel, Jesus is not interested in teaching about himself. But when you read John's Gospel, that's virtually the only thing Jesus talks about is who he is, what his identity is, where he came from," Ehrman says. "This is completely unlike anything that you find in Mark or in Matthew and Luke. And historically it creates all sorts of problems, because if the historical Jesus actually went around saying that he was God, it's very hard to believe that Matthew, Mark and Luke left out that part - you know, as if that part wasn't important to mention. But in fact, they don't mention it. And so this view of the divinity of Jesus on his own lips is found only in our latest Gospel, the Gospel of John."
Chapter Four
Students taking a college-level Bible course for the first time often find it surprising that we don't know who wrote most of the books of the New Testament. How could that be? Don't these books all have the authors' names attached to them? Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, the letters of Paul, 1 and 2 Peter, and 1, 2 and 3 John? How could the wrong names be attached to books of Scripture? Isn't this the Word of God? If someone wrote a book claiming to be Paul while knowing full well that he wasn't Paul - isn't that lying? Can Scripture contain lies?
When I arrived at seminary I was fully armed and ready for the onslaught on my faith by liberal biblical scholars who were going to insist on such crazy ideas. Having been trained in conservative circles, I knew that these views were standard fare at places like Princeton Theological Seminary. But what did they know? Bunch of liberals.
What came as a shock to me over time was just how little actual evidence there is for the traditional ascriptions of authorship that I had always taken for granted, and how much real evidence there was that many of these ascriptions are wrong. It turned out the liberals actually had something to say and had evidence to back it up; they weren't simply involved in destructive wishful thinking. There were some books, such as the Gospels, that had been written anonymously, only later to be ascribed to certain authors who probably did not write them (apostles and friends of the apostles). Other books were written by authors who flat out claimed to be someone they weren't.
In this chapter I'd like to explain what that evidence is.
Who Wrote The Gospels?
Though it is evidently not the sort of thing pastors normally tell their congregations, for over a century there has been a broad consensus among scholars that many of the books of the New Testament were not written by the people whose names are attached to them. So if that is the case, who did write them?
Preliminary Observations: The Gospels as Eyewitness Accounts
As we have just seen, the Gospels are filled with discrepancies large and small. Why are there so many differences among the four Gospels? These books are called Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John because they were traditionally thought to have been written by Matthew, a disciple who was a tax collector; John, the "Beloved Disciple" mentioned in the Fourth Gospel; Mark, the secretary of the disciple Peter; and Luke, the traveling companion of Paul. These traditions can be traced back to about a century after the books were written.
But if Matthew and John were both written by earthly disciples of Jesus, why are they so very different, on all sorts of levels? Why do they contain so many contradictions? Why do they have such fundamentally different views of who Jesus was? In Matthew, Jesus comes into being when he is conceived, or born, of a virgin; in John, Jesus is the incarnate Word of God who was with God in the beginning and through whom the universe was made. In Matthew, there is not a word about Jesus being God; in John, that's precisely who he is. In Matthew, Jesus teaches about the coming kingdom of God and almost never about himself (and never that he is divine); in John, Jesus teaches almost exclusively about himself, especially his divinity. In Matthew, Jesus refuses to perform miracles in order to prove his identity; in John, that is practically the only reason he does miracles.
Did two of the earthly followers of Jesus really have such radically different understandings of who he was? It is possible. Two people who served in the administration of George W. Bush may well have radically different views about him (although I doubt anyone would call him divine). This raises an important methodological point that I want to stress before discussing the evidence for the authorship of the Gospels.
Why did the tradition eventually arise that these books were written by apostles and companions of the apostles? In part it was in order to assure readers that they were written by eyewitnesses and companions of eyewitnesses. An eyewitness could be trusted to relate the truth of what actually happened in Jesus' life. But the reality is that eyewitnesses cannot be trusted to give historically accurate accounts. They never could be trusted and can't be trusted still. If eyewitnesses always gave historically accurate accounts, we would have no need for law courts. If we needed to find out what actually happened when a crime was committed, we could just ask someone. Real-life legal cases require multiple eyewitnesses, because eyewitnesses' testimonies differ. If two eyewitnesses in a court of law were to differ as much as Matthew and John, imagine how hard it would be to reach a judgment.
A further reality is that all the Gospels were written anonymously, and none of the writers claims to be an eyewitness. Names are attached to the titles of the Gospels ("the Gospel according to Matthew"), but these titles are later additions to the Gospels, provided by editors and scribes to inform readers who the editors thought were the authorities behind the different versions. That the titles are not original to the Gospels themselves should be clear upon some simple reflection. Whoever wrote Matthew did not call it "The Gospel according to Matthew." The persons who gave it that title are telling you who, in their opinion, wrote it. Authors never title their books "according to."
Moreover, Matthew's Gospel is written completely in the third person, about what "they" - Jesus and the disciples - were doing, never about what "we" - Jesus and the rest of us - were doing. Even when this Gospel narrates the event of Matthew being called to become a disciple, it talks about "him," not about "me." Read the account for yourself (Matthew 9:9). There's not a thing in it that would make you suspect the author is talking about himself.
With John it is even more clear. At the end of the Gospel the author says of the "Beloved Disciple": "This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true" (John 21:24). Note how the author differentiates between his source of information, "the disciple who testifies," and himself: "we know that his testimony is true." He/we: this author is not the disciple. He claims to have gotten some of his information from the disciple.
As for the other Gospels, Mark was said to be not a disciple but a companion of Peter, and Luke was a companion of Paul, who also was not a disciple. Even if they had been disciples, it would not guarantee the objectivity or truthfulness of their stories. But in fact none of the writers was an eyewitness, and none of them claims to be.
Who, then, wrote these books?
I'm a Muslim ☪️ but siraj is unprofessional debater he's still young btw please learn to listen other's
I really enjoy watching Ali Daawh
Stop waddling and pretending !! This sounds Christians mind games . Go bark elsewhere, why would he listent irrelevant speech, which is got nothing to do with his questions ? Let the logic work...
He lost first 2 minutes. After that he was keep repeating again and again
Yah that's right. He never answered a single question that Siraj asks him. I think there's no point to discuss this christian guy with the brothers from speaker corner cos it's just wasted of time. Now he's been marked
Need patience of a saint to talk about Christianity....
25:21 he lost it 🤡
Lets look at scripture,,, Mathews Testament says; yielded up His spirit. Mark accounts; With a loud cry, Jesus breathed his last. Luke; he breathed his last. John says; he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. So where this is from, I don't know... its a Strawman! .... Mr Robertson says below Siraj is charismatic yes and? , So is Satan. Truth and charm are not Synonymous.
There are many verses in the Bible where it says that Jesus is God, and where Jesus spoke of Himself as One higher than prophets, and before Abraham was "I AM" Scriptures are filled with writings that say over and over and over that Jesus is God that came in the flesh. That is why He was crucified because He was making Himself Equal to God. This Siraj, knows all these verses, but on purpose, convolutes, twists, manipulating Holy Scriptures, to spread his lie and to keep people away from truth. Truth is in Jesus Christ. When Jesus disciple asked Jesus "show us the Father and it is sufficient to us" Jesus answer, so much time I AM with you and you still dont know ME? WHOEVER SEEN ME, SEEN THE FATHER! Sins of man kind, can only be forgiven by blood, thats the requirement of Allah. You have no blood? You have no forgiveness!! Only blood Allah the Father will accept is the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ
SAm Dawah has many errors. Christians do not believe that Jesus is the Father. Jesus did not need to claim divinity before starting his ministry. Is the same to ask why the Quran was not sent before. Christians do not believe that Jesus was not God before 33, many inconsistencies.
Common sense is actually missing with Christians, how stupid is this logic. Jesus is “God” because he’s sinless 🤣🤦🏾
Do women's give birth GOD or child's?? 👀👀
Mina you tried to debate every one at speakers corner but get smashed every time, you should read the Qur'an with an open mind and heart and you'll find the Truth 🤲
Alhamdulillah you got him brother drop the mic and his face bro allahu Akbar allahu Akbar come on let me see you smile why do Christians keep doing this to yourself knowing that the book that you have even by your own scholars even by your own high scholars 50 of them talked about how these books are all corrupted that we cannot put trust on this for all salvation for all eternity on the day of judgment what is this tell you Christians come to Islam you want to be safe you want to go to paradise come to Islam take your shahada repent to God take your shahada and worship the one true God Allah Allah stop fooling yourself you cannot fool God you will be in the hellfire what is this what you guys want to do go to the hellfire you know if you partner anyone to a law or two to the one true God which is Allah Elohim it's still Allah swt stop playing with us Muslims cuz we walk with the truth we are in the straight path we are guaranteed Paradise even if we go to the hellfire eventually all the Muslims will be taken out of the hellfire and what comes in the grave before that day it's even worse they both bad even in the grave before you get the judgment Day
Quran is the speech of Allah here he has given all human being, the assurance and ordered us all to follow his words which will guide us to the truth and the whole truth.
=========== The Opening of Chapter 2:1-5. ===========
(2:1) Alif, Lam, Mim.1
1. The names of letters of the Arabic alphabet, called huruf muqatta'at, occur at the beginning of several surahs of the Qur'an. At the time of the Qur'anic revelation the use of such letters was a well-known literary device, used by both poets and orators, and we find several instances in the pre-Islamic Arabic literature that has come down to us.
Since the muqatta'at were commonly used the Arabs of that period generally knew what they meant and so they did not present a puzzle. We do not notice, therefore, any contemporaries of the Prophet (peace be on him) raising objections against the Qur'an on the ground that the letters at the beginning of some of its surahs were absurd. For the same reason no Tradition has come down to us of any Companion asking the Prophet about the significance of the muqatta'at. Later on this literary device gradually fell into disuse and hence it became difficult for commentators to determine their precise meanings. It is obvious, however, that deriving right guidance from the Qur'an does not depend on grasping the meaning of these vocables, and that anyone who fails to understand them may still live a righteous life and attain salvation. The ordinary reader, therefore, need not delve too deeply into this matter.
(2:2) This is the Book of Allah, there is no doubt in it;2 it is a guidance for the pious,3
2. One obvious meaning of this verse is that this Book, the Qur'an, is undoubtedly from God. Another possible meaning is that nothing contained in it can be subject to doubt. Books which deal with supernatural questions, with matters that lie beyond the range of sense perception, are invariably based on conjecture and their authors, despite their brave show of competence, are therefore not immune from a degree of scepticism regarding their statements. This Book, which is based wholly on Truth, a Book which is the work of none other than the All-Knowing God Himself is distinguishable from all other books. Hence, there is no room for doubt about its contents despite the hesitation some people might express either through ignorance or folly.
3. This means that while the Book is potentially for all, only those who possess certain qualities can benefit from it. The first such quality is piety: those who want to benefit should be disposed to distinguish between good and evil, and to shun evil and do good. Those who lead an animal existence, who never to consider whether their actions are either good or bad, whose cynically follow the prevailing winds, who are helplessly tossed about by the animal desires that dominate their minds, such persons are all together incapable of deriving any benefit from the guidance embodied in the Qur'an.
(2:3) for those who believe in the existence of that which is beyond the reach of perception,4 who establish Prayer5 and spend out of what We have provided them,6
4. This is the second prerequisite for deriving benefit from the Qur'an. Ghayb signifies the verities which are hidden from man's senses and which are beyond the scope of man's ordinary observation and experience, for example the existence and attributes of God, the angels. the process of revelation, Paradise, Hell and so on. 'Belief in the ghaib' means having faith in such matters, based on an absolute confidence in the Messengers of God and despite the fact that it is impossible to experience them.
According to this verse, Qur'anic guidance can prove helpful only to those prepared to affirm the truths of the suprasensory realm. People who make their belief in these questions conditional upon sensory perception of the object of belief, and who are not prepared even to consider the possibility of the existence of things that cannot be weighed or measured, cannot profit from this Book.
5. This is the third requirement. It is pointed out that those to whom belief means merely the pronouncement of a formula, who think that a mere verbal confession of faith is enough and that it makes no practical demands on them, can derive no guidance from the Qur'an. To benefit from the Qur'an it is essential that a man's decision to believe should be followed immediately by practical obedience to God.
Prayer is the first and continuing sign of practical obedience. No more than a few hours can pass after a man has embraced Islam than the mu'adhin calls to Prayer and it becomes evident whether or not the profession of faith has been genuine. Moreover, the mu'adhin calls to Prayer five times every day and whenever a man fails to respond to his call it becomes clear that he has transgressed the bounds of practical obedience. An abandonment of Prayer amounts to an abandonment of obedience. Obviously, if a man is not prepared to follow the directives of his guide, it is immaterial whether or not true guidance is available to him.
It should also be noted that the expression 'establishment of Prayer' has a wider meaning than mere performance of Prayer. It means that the system of Prayer should be organized on a collective basis. If there is a person in a locality who prays individually but no arrangements are made for congregational Prayer, it cannot be claimed that Prayer is established in that locality.
6. This, the fourth prerequisite for a person to benefit from the Qur'an, demands that the person concerned should neither be niggardly nor a worshipper of money. On the contrary, he should be willing to pay the claims on his property of both God and man, and should not flinch from making financial sacrifices for the sake of his convictions.
(2:4) who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed before you,7 and have firm faith in the Hereafter.8
7. The fifth requirement is that one should believe in the Books revealed by God to His Prophets in the various ages and regions of the world, in the Book revealed to Muhammad (peace be on him) as well as in those revealed to the other Prophets who preceded him. The door of the Qur'an is closed to all those who do not consider it necessary for man to receive guidance from God. It is also closed to those who, even if they believe in the need for such guidance, do not consider it necessary to seek it through the channel of revelation and prophethood, but would rather weave their own set of ideas and concepts and regard them as equivalent to Divine Guidance.
This door is also closed to those who believe in Divine books as such, but confine this belief to those books accepted by their forefathers, and spurn Divine Guidance revealed to anyone born beyond their own racial and national boundaries. The Qur'an excludes all such people and is prepared to open the source of its grace only to those who believe that mankind does require Divine Guidance, who acknowledge that this guidance does not come to people individually but reaches them through Prophets and Divine Books and who are not given to racial or national chauvinism but are devotees of Truth alone, and are therefore prepared to submit to Divine Guidance wherever it be found.
8. Belief in the After-life is the sixth and last requirement. The term al-Akhirah embraces a whole set of ideas: (i) that man is not an irresponsible being, but is answerable to God for all his conduct in this world; (ii) that the present order of the world is not timeless, but will come to an end at an appointed hour known only to God; (iii) that when this world comes to an end God will bring into being another world in which He will resurrect, at one and the same moment, all the human beings ever born on earth. He will gather them together, examine their conduct and grant each one just reward for his actions; (iv) that those who are accounted good in God's judgement will be sent to Heaven, and those judged by Him as evil-doers will be consigned to Hell; (v) that the real measure of success and failure is not one's prosperity in the present life, but one's success or failure according to God's judgement in the Next. Those who do not accept this set of beliefs can derive no benefit from the Qur'an. For if a man is merely in a state of doubt and hesitation with regard to these matters - let alone disbelieving them - he cannot advance even one step forward along the path charted out by the Qur'an.
(2:5) Such are on true guidance from their Lord; such are the truly successful.