The US Military's Aerial Refueling PROBLEM

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
  • Play War Thunder for FREE on PC, Playstation and Xbox.
    Click the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now: playwt.link/notwhatyouthink2024
    0:00 How long can a fighter jet fly for without aerial refueling?
    2:33 Why was the flying boom developed?
    3:44 KC-97 Stratofreighter's major flaw
    4:51 Aerial refueling from a KC-135 Stratotanker
    7:32 why aircraft have a refueling slipway
    8:19 War Thunder (sponsor)
    9:16 Refueling stealth aircraft in the air
    10:29 What happens if aerial refueling boom or hose cannot be retracted
    10:49 The downside of the KC-135 Stratotanker
    11:04 The Boom Drogue Adapter (BDA)
    12:05 The limitations of the Boom Drogue Adapter
    Why the US Navy uses its most sophisticated fighter jets fuel other aircraft, how aerial refueling can help airplanes save on fuel and carry more payload, what made the F-4 Phantom notoriously difficult to mate with, and finally, how using a slower fuel transfer method can in fact speed up the refueling process, is #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #longs
    Music:
    Universal Solution - Robert Ruth
    Yhello - Lofive
    Parkour Law - Truvio
    The Showroom - V.V. Campos
    Amalthea - Van Sandano
    Flightmode - Chris Shards
    Skipping Class - Birdies
    Cloak - Christoffer Moe Ditlevsen
    Break Down - Phoenix Tail
    Composite Key - DEX 1200
    Thyone - Ben Elson
    Montage of a Map - Eden Avery
    Beyond the Mountains - Experia
    On the Trail - Tigerblood Jewel
    Linda Low - Lucention
    Footage:
    Select images/videos from Getty Images
    Shutterstock
    US Department of Defense
    Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 319

  • @NotWhatYouThink
    @NotWhatYouThink  26 днів тому +37

    Play War Thunder for FREE on PC, Playstation and Xbox.
    Click the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now: playwt.link/notwhatyouthink2024

    • @LaggySoupDealer
      @LaggySoupDealer 23 дні тому +8

      vid about war thunder military leaks?

    • @skoldmo762
      @skoldmo762 23 дні тому +4

      Vid about Gajin sponsors Donbas seperatists? ​@@LaggySoupDealer

    • @LordBobeus-to9yz
      @LordBobeus-to9yz 23 дні тому +2

      its not really a limited time offer, war thunder sponsors youtubers so often that you can find this offer for every day of the year

    • @VGACGAEGA
      @VGACGAEGA 23 дні тому

      Best segue ever

    • @KEEPCALMandBEGAMER_channel
      @KEEPCALMandBEGAMER_channel 23 дні тому

      war thunder is a game from the russian devs

  • @OrionArmwrestling
    @OrionArmwrestling 23 дні тому +254

    "A boomer, laying on their belly, passing gas." - Not What You Think

  • @PonyK98
    @PonyK98 23 дні тому +323

    Kid: Dad. What are those two planes doing together?
    Dad: They are mating son

    • @benstokes69
      @benstokes69 23 дні тому +3

      😂😂

    • @cruisinguy6024
      @cruisinguy6024 23 дні тому +2

      I definitely read the dad in a Hank Hill voice

    • @lweberk
      @lweberk 22 дні тому +5

      That's how airplanes are made, son

    • @Michael_Brock
      @Michael_Brock 21 день тому +4

      Btw I did see 3 planes in serial formation drogue formation.

    • @seansingh4421
      @seansingh4421 21 день тому +3

      @@Michael_Brocksometimes planes experiment with other planes son to keep the “fire” going

  • @therealdohos2607
    @therealdohos2607 23 дні тому +179

    I Laughed out loud when u inserted the warthunder sponsor after the hourly price of the simulator

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen 23 дні тому +13

      Either losing money to refuel those jet, of losing to the snail 😂

    • @z0phi3l
      @z0phi3l 23 дні тому +3

      Warthunder needs a mod to practice in air refueling !!!

    • @user-gu8qi4me8x
      @user-gu8qi4me8x 18 днів тому

      I actually agree ​@@z0phi3l

    • @diadromes8000
      @diadromes8000 18 годин тому

      @@z0phi3l vtol vr does... as the craft being refueled

  • @abc-coleaks-info3180
    @abc-coleaks-info3180 23 дні тому +56

    If the “birdie” is old, bent or slightly damaged the damn thing will often oscillate in a figure eight pattern requiring the Naval Pilot to split the difference and aim for where it will be when he gets there.

  • @fuzzybloodpc9291
    @fuzzybloodpc9291 22 дні тому +13

    9:54 I thought that was a still image!!

  • @anotherbacklog
    @anotherbacklog 23 дні тому +32

    Now thanks to this video I can never look at aerial refueling the same way again

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 23 дні тому +42

    That thumbnail reminds me of my first *"aerial refueling"* in middle school history. Thanks Miss Blom! You'll always be twenty-two in my dreams.

  • @davidemartorana4708
    @davidemartorana4708 23 дні тому +99

    Sex bots really like videos on military Aviation, Who would have thought

  • @taesssi
    @taesssi 21 день тому +6

    lmao "Incase a tanker gets too excited and cannot retract the boom....." - NWYT

    • @WhiteCoastRS
      @WhiteCoastRS 15 днів тому +2

      NWYT? more like NSFW

    • @SwordOfApollo
      @SwordOfApollo 7 днів тому +3

      "If your boom extension lasts longer than 4 hours, seek medical attention."

    • @WhiteCoastRS
      @WhiteCoastRS 12 годин тому

      @@SwordOfApollo BRO WHATS THE TIMESTAMP HAHA

  • @flightmaster999
    @flightmaster999 23 дні тому +18

    Too bad the KC-46 can't do half of what it is designed for because Boeing used the wrong kind of (black and white) camera on them. Should have bought the MRTT instead, which is just better in every way, not to mention that is actually works.

    • @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh
      @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh 22 дні тому +5

      "It's a game changer" because the camera fogs up half the time.

  • @centralplains7608
    @centralplains7608 20 днів тому +1

    Thank you for a MOST comprehensive overview of the aerial refueling subject! As usual, your vids lead to a greater understanding of aviation and various systems. Plz keep up the GREAT WORK!!

  • @curiousmindshubofficial
    @curiousmindshubofficial 23 дні тому +1

    Super informative video! It’s amazing to understand just how critical in-flight refueling is for maintaining the operational range and effectiveness of fighter jets. Your breakdown of the process and its importance was perfectly clear. Thanks for shedding light on such a pivotal aspect of modern air combat!

  • @iskandartaib
    @iskandartaib 21 день тому +3

    Thanks, this was a great deal more informative than I thought it would be. Learned quite a bit.

  • @carlsoll
    @carlsoll 23 дні тому +17

    9:55 Woahh O.O *that* was a video :o

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen 23 дні тому +1

      Thanks for pointing it😂

    • @Tobinator7274
      @Tobinator7274 23 дні тому +2

      was thinking the same thing lol

  • @koryhardy9594
    @koryhardy9594 23 дні тому +20

    30mins trying to stable 2 aircraft for refueling is just insane work 🤯

  • @cagin5
    @cagin5 23 дні тому +14

    Gasped at 19:14 seeing that NATO AWACS almost bump into the tanker!

  • @Ice_Karma
    @Ice_Karma 20 днів тому +1

    Always great videos! BTW, in 'scarce' and 'scarcity', the first syllable sounds like 'scare', rather than 'scar'. ♥😻

  • @indyjons321
    @indyjons321 20 днів тому

    Fantastic video! Answered all the questions I had about tankers.

  • @No1DiscoveryTV
    @No1DiscoveryTV 23 дні тому +14

    For the past 100 years air-to-air refuelling has been the exclusive preserve of military aviation to project power across the globe

    • @johnsmithe4656
      @johnsmithe4656 22 дні тому

      Yummy.

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 19 днів тому +1

      While inflight refueling saves gas, I very much doubt it saves money. An airline: -) Must buy and maintain a fleet of tankers, as well as train boom operators.
      -) The pilots of the passenger/freighter aircraft have to be trained/qualified for inflight docking
      -) Airports en route would have to be schedule for the possibility of an unscheduled landing because weather, malfunctions, etc, prevented the inflight refueling.
      -) Here's the kicker......LIABILITY...Imagine weather or operator error causing a collision, killing hundreds and the loss of two aircraft.

  • @capitandelespacio
    @capitandelespacio 23 дні тому +4

    I remember how hard was trying to refuel in-flight my F-14 Tomcat.... (in the NES version of Top Gun).

  • @northropi2027
    @northropi2027 21 день тому +2

    hey, i've been to that KC-97. it's at March Field, they also have a YA-9 there.

  • @michaelmckeever2734
    @michaelmckeever2734 22 дні тому +3

    I lost count of the number of ARs I've done. One time, over Maine on our way to a deployment, we disconnected from the KC-135 about 6-9 times because our orbit was over a thunderstorm and we couldn't maintain contact. Quite literally the most stressful AR ever.

  • @VincentGirod
    @VincentGirod 22 дні тому +2

    Always instructive and fun !

  • @ChookyChuck
    @ChookyChuck 17 днів тому

    At 21:46 there is an omega aircraft refueling a drone. In the mid 1990's I designed the 707 fuel system modifications for the 1st Omega Tanker. Omega contracted AEL/Tracor to modify one of there 707 Aircraft to be a hose and drogue tanker. The fuel system modifications installed two large Aerial Refueling pumps in the wing belly tanks. These pumps were connected with 4 inch diameter fuel lines to 2 removable pallets. Each pallet contained an FR300 hydraulic hose reel systems. These pallets where part of the B-kit and were designed to be removed from the aircraft in about an hour. With a removable Air Refueling B-Kit the Aircraft could perform either civilien or aerial refueling missions. The Aircraft had two hose reels for redundancy so that ocean crossing could be performed safely with only one tanker. It could deliver over 500 gallons per minute which was the highest flow rate for a 2 5/8 inch Inner Diameter Hose and Drogue system at the time. I have not kept up with what improvements were made to the Omega system over the years. It would be interesting to see how they are using it today.

  • @jordibt1789
    @jordibt1789 23 дні тому +4

    Damn, NWYT has that Big Altima Energy

  • @notmenotme614
    @notmenotme614 23 дні тому

    Another thing with drogue refuelling is sometimes the drogue can shear off, leaving it attached to the receiver aircraft. Which made their landing interesting when it still had the basket and a few meters of pipe attached.
    We’ve also experienced the drogue wafting around in turbulence and hitting the pitot probes, causing the receiver aircraft to abort.
    Having said that, the drogue method has been used for decades on 1000s of sorties.
    I remember reading the book Flight Of The Intruder, which said A-6’s fitted with a buddy refuelling pod were crucial to helping those who struggled to land on an aircraft carrier. If they struggled to get down and did many bolters, they’d send up the standby refueller to save them before they ran out of fuel.

  • @bobgreene2892
    @bobgreene2892 20 днів тому

    Well-organized and clearly presented
    We thought we already knew the "basics", until we saw this video.

  • @jamiebray8532
    @jamiebray8532 23 дні тому +1

    Man i love watching your videos. It seems like forever waiting for a new video to drop. I start going through dt convulsions and stuff. 😂😂😂😂

  • @lukevaxhacker7762
    @lukevaxhacker7762 23 дні тому +10

    Does beg the question: Why is the KC-10 *retiring* while the older design KC-135 *still flying*?!

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen 23 дні тому +3

      I wondering too, why retired the best of the best among the best that proven the best already

    • @zsu-23-4shilka2
      @zsu-23-4shilka2 23 дні тому +2

      The D/KC-10 has a rather poor safety history.

    • @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh
      @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh 22 дні тому +2

      Apparently, it's a numbers game. Retiring the 60 KC-10 is cheaper in the long run than splitting the number between the two airframes. Which kind of makes sense.

    • @xxxotiknightz
      @xxxotiknightz 22 дні тому +4

      It has nothing to do with safety. I flew on the 10 as a boom for years. It’s a game of averages and numbers. The AF brass determined that the average offload was ~63k lbs. Which is well within the 135 and 46 capabilities. They decided more aircraft was better rather than more capabilities.

    • @jaquigreenlees
      @jaquigreenlees 21 день тому +2

      the 135 is the only option to refuel helicopters, the jet powered options wind up at or barely above stall speed if they try to refuel a helicopter.

  • @ThorsonWiles
    @ThorsonWiles 21 день тому +1

    From what I've heard about the KC-46, when the receiver is backlit, meaning the sun is close to being directly being the receiver, the digital camera's have an issue with even seeing the receiver aircraft, let alone where the boom needs to be flown into. (In my experience, in life, not anything related to this, the mark 1 usually has an advantage over tech. Meaning the eyeball in the rear vs. the camera provided image in the front.)

  • @fyrebatskymarshall1778
    @fyrebatskymarshall1778 23 дні тому +1

    that ad transistion was mint

  • @uss_liberty_incident
    @uss_liberty_incident 23 дні тому +6

    Funny how War Thunder teaches how vital fuel management is in a modern, afterburning fighter. IE, the F-14 GUZZLES fuel at full A/B.

    • @counterfit5
      @counterfit5 21 день тому

      Everything guzzles fuel in full A/B

    • @piscessoedroen
      @piscessoedroen 18 днів тому

      @@counterfit5 there's guzzling fuel, and then there's dumping the whole tank into the engine. F-14 is the latter

  • @dave.g.nowitzki4897
    @dave.g.nowitzki4897 20 днів тому

    great vid !
    i would love to know what all those markings on the planes mean like the one in 7:04 for the slip

  • @irrelEvant5352
    @irrelEvant5352 23 дні тому +11

    0:56 i bet that took you a couple tries to say with a straight voice 😂 Peak humor right there

  • @scribehades
    @scribehades 22 дні тому +1

    That BOOM ENGAGED indicator light would be awesome for a sound engineering board

  • @pathos48
    @pathos48 21 день тому

    I have been wondering what that rotating hatch on B2 were. Finally I know!

  • @ObiWanCannabi
    @ObiWanCannabi 23 дні тому +4

    ever tried air to air refuelling on DCS world... it took me more than 45 minutes

  • @generybarczyk6993
    @generybarczyk6993 23 дні тому +1

    Good one. Flares!

  • @stevengmarcus
    @stevengmarcus 18 днів тому +1

    Crown royal bag for a chin pad is a nice touch

  • @TAR3N
    @TAR3N 19 днів тому

    I always thought this was the most boring part of aviation…. And you made it fascinating ! Thank you 🙏 It’s not what you think!

  • @stevenlauzon7031
    @stevenlauzon7031 23 дні тому

    Digging the Crown Royal chin rest

  • @mrbharathkiran.1508
    @mrbharathkiran.1508 23 дні тому +2

    Love your video quality and content

  • @BosonCollider
    @BosonCollider 23 дні тому +3

    8:15 Okay, that was the smoothest ad transition I have seen ever, you deserve every cent of ad money for that and this is not something I say often

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen 23 дні тому +1

      Either Losing dollar to refueling or to those pesky snail😂

  • @NSJonesy94
    @NSJonesy94 23 дні тому +5

    Hahaha, Crown Royal bag for the chin rest @5:11

  • @stevewilley1029
    @stevewilley1029 5 днів тому

    the Air Force was short sighted when it did start equipping all KC 135 tankers with MPRS when they became available. I had to install many drogue adapters in my career as a crew chief.

  • @Michael_Brock
    @Michael_Brock 21 день тому

    Awesome video

  • @tweezerjam
    @tweezerjam 4 дні тому

    Very cool. What about how they match speeds?

  • @geetargeek79
    @geetargeek79 21 день тому +1

    VFA-115 here during the period mentioned. I can say that refueling missions weren't the favorite. They were very long missions just for the pilot to be a flying gas station. Unlike those big AF tankers, the Super Hornets aren't as comfortable either. It isn't like the pilot could stand up to take a leak. But don't get me wrong because they can, just not standing up. 😂

  • @MrVanMises
    @MrVanMises 23 дні тому +2

    7:25 : I don't want to know how much shooting flares for fun is costing the taxpayer

  • @Bruno74823..
    @Bruno74823.. 23 дні тому +12

    The bots kinda love military refueling i guess not gonna judge them i also enjoy whatching planes refuel

  • @libertarian1637
    @libertarian1637 23 дні тому +5

    F-15EX can fly from US to UK without mid-air refueling. At 45 minutes the pilot must have been for an F-16.
    It’s quite standardized, US Air Force - Boom; Navy/USMC - drogue, ALL helicopters - drogue. The US military is represented by multiple branches with different needs; a one size fits all approach sometimes isn’t the best for all.

    • @XxDramaticBatu
      @XxDramaticBatu 23 дні тому +1

      That name is not a mistake. F-1SEX

    • @LSmoney215
      @LSmoney215 23 дні тому +1

      I think they talking about combat conditions

  • @lowercasegamer
    @lowercasegamer 23 дні тому +26

    Slight title mistake. I think it should be Standardized not Standardize ( If he changes title ignore comment)

    • @viewer-of-content
      @viewer-of-content 23 дні тому +1

      He has an accent I think. In 2x it sounded correct

    • @Rotorhead1651
      @Rotorhead1651 23 дні тому

      You are correct. Grammatically, it should be "standardized".

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen 23 дні тому +1

      Grammar MP

    • @user-gu8qi4me8x
      @user-gu8qi4me8x 18 днів тому

      ​@@muhazreenl actually agree with you.

  • @michaelm54877
    @michaelm54877 23 дні тому +2

    When a tanker loves a B-2 bomber very much... and that is how F-16's are born.

  • @busboy262
    @busboy262 21 день тому

    I can't imagine what just the pivot on that adapter costs. I bet the cost of the adapter is high, but that knuckle probably accounts for more than half of that cost.

  • @TYZ-Foodie68
    @TYZ-Foodie68 12 днів тому

    It’s a good one !!

  • @julianp2868
    @julianp2868 23 дні тому

    Very interesting

  • @ilaril
    @ilaril 21 день тому

    The KC-46's new system is anything but good. Maybe one day.

  • @nekomakhea9440
    @nekomakhea9440 23 дні тому +2

    Wouldn't the C-2's be better refueling planes for carriers than F-18's? They would have much larger fuel capacity, and could carry extra fuel bags in their cargo bay. Also, they're turboprops, so they could probably go slow enough to refuel any helicopters or tiltrotors in the carrier's fleet. And you wouldn't need to procure new fuel drones, just use what you already have in a different way.

    • @czaja995
      @czaja995 23 дні тому +2

      C-2 is propeller aircraft, it's too slow for refueling fighter jets.

    • @abc-coleaks-info3180
      @abc-coleaks-info3180 23 дні тому +1

      The C2 is being phased out for the Osprey. They do have a setup for refueling from the Osprey but jet refueling is limited by minimum flight speed.

    • @SkyhawkSteve
      @SkyhawkSteve 23 дні тому

      @@czaja995 if the KC-130 isn't too slow, then it's not clear why the C-2 would be too slow.

  • @h8GW
    @h8GW 21 день тому

    It's wild how the B-2 refueling door just disappears into the fuselage skin when closed.

  • @counterfit5
    @counterfit5 21 день тому

    I will as hoping to see the Sea King chopping off its own probe, and there it is at 19:41

  • @ronaldoc5637
    @ronaldoc5637 23 дні тому +2

    The Embraer KC-390 may fill that gap...

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 19 днів тому

    I thought I remembered your voice on the previous vid I just watched. 👍 - 👍

  • @EdwardSnowden125
    @EdwardSnowden125 20 днів тому

    7:00 why don't they set up a system where after the boom is engaged both the aircraft get controlled by the pilot of the tanker(with difference in sensitivities ofc) would that not help?

  • @flora_7719
    @flora_7719 22 дні тому +1

    You've heard of two trucks... Now get ready for two planes

  • @Dekhti-ankh
    @Dekhti-ankh 23 дні тому +3

    Here we are, listening damn jokes from my boy

  • @Rose.Of.Hizaki
    @Rose.Of.Hizaki 20 днів тому

    2:53 - Im guessing some Navy pilots also need more flight/seat time to their name so it looks better on paper should they want to transfer elsewhere within the military or outside of it as maybe a civilian pilot etc etc.

  • @Finn_given
    @Finn_given 15 днів тому

    He really likes mentioning the iron dome project in every video

  • @ScotchBonnetHand_
    @ScotchBonnetHand_ 23 дні тому

    I did not see that War Thunder promo coming 😂

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 23 дні тому +1

    How do the dtogue actually hook onto the probes?

  • @kartiksaxena152
    @kartiksaxena152 21 день тому

    the title literally changed while i was watching wtf when i started watching it was " why the us airforce has two refueling methods " and when i clicked off its now " how aerial gas stations work "

  • @Dog_Toy.
    @Dog_Toy. 23 дні тому

    You knew what you were doing with that thumbnail.

  • @Vmaxfodder
    @Vmaxfodder 22 дні тому

    This cone needs to have its own stabilizing wings

  • @michaelm54877
    @michaelm54877 23 дні тому

    The hard part when fighting a near peer foe will be the protection of tankers. The new steathy drone tankers should help though.

  • @gideoncornfield4732
    @gideoncornfield4732 23 дні тому +1

    That was a perfect add intro. I have pain thunder I play my ace p61 from time to time. Do you know the reason for flares after refueling? Is it just a sex joke?

  • @jjfdkdjiwejnd092
    @jjfdkdjiwejnd092 22 дні тому

    "it's okay if you can't get it up Mr plane, it happens to all of us as we get older"

  • @scottmeredith3359
    @scottmeredith3359 19 днів тому

    Must be harrowing to have that big hose waving around in your face, knowing it could erupt and spray at any moment

  • @gehaofeiphpps8891
    @gehaofeiphpps8891 16 днів тому

    magnet to help with linking?

  • @misanthropicphilanthropy
    @misanthropicphilanthropy 2 дні тому

    I'm loving the "sex puns" and fart jokes 😂 (passing gas)😂

  • @mr_gaider6174
    @mr_gaider6174 19 днів тому

    I think that boom is better for bigger aircraft and probe and drogue for the smaller aircraft like a fighter.

  • @tau93
    @tau93 23 дні тому +3

    after seeing the notification I knew the original title and thumbnail were going to be changed quickly 😂😂

  • @west8772
    @west8772 22 дні тому +1

    Damn I kinda ignored this video but after the change in title and thumbnail it worked insanely well LMFAO

  • @rael5469
    @rael5469 8 днів тому

    17:48 Tell me that beard isn't within 35.10. What happened to my Air Force?????

  • @e_norrby
    @e_norrby 21 день тому

    10:22 Correct me if i am wrong, but is that not a F-35B?

  • @ledio87
    @ledio87 21 день тому

    "Don't let the hose fool you" - Not what you think

  • @user-ue6zx2do2f
    @user-ue6zx2do2f 23 дні тому +2

    And airbus boom can refuel automatically

  • @whatever_12
    @whatever_12 21 день тому +1

    What happened at 19:10? Did the plane hit sudden turbulence for it to rise or something else.. Did nato released details about the cause?

    • @NotWhatYouThink
      @NotWhatYouThink  21 день тому

      Look this up on UA-cam:
      “Aerial refueling accidents examined”
      We discuss the E-3 early on in the video.

  • @hiddenshadow4473
    @hiddenshadow4473 23 дні тому

    I swear this guy is my CIA agent. every time I think of something that's interesting he makes a video about it.

  • @lxndrlbr
    @lxndrlbr 23 дні тому +3

    Those probe-and-drogue mishaps are quite spectacular! And i would not be chill flying through the fuel spray in my combat jet with 400° EGT and whatever static electricity build-up on my aircraft's skin! (Yes i know jet fuel is acktchually hard to ignite)

  • @globalautobahn1132
    @globalautobahn1132 23 дні тому +1

    1:44 but the new Air Force One is not going to be capable of in-flight refueling

  • @brucenice3169
    @brucenice3169 21 день тому

    Lol. Anyone else notice that all the chin rests used by the Boom Pilots are all covered with Crown Royal bags? Lol!

  • @Mr.Manta5988
    @Mr.Manta5988 22 дні тому

    How many times have you changed the thumbnail by now?

  • @Milxfanta
    @Milxfanta 22 дні тому +1

    10:29 woah

  • @dave4882
    @dave4882 21 день тому

    How about we design fighter jets to hold the fuel they need at takeoff? Make areal refueling a less common thing. What is the difference in cost of a gallon of fuel on the ground, vs at 30,000 ft?

  • @BLD426
    @BLD426 23 дні тому +1

    That was exactly what I thunk.😁

  • @smolmoru
    @smolmoru 20 днів тому

    the thing that trips me up the most is that these things are called booms

  • @xXxKAMIKAZExXx
    @xXxKAMIKAZExXx 23 дні тому +3

    19:41 Oops

  • @landmarker
    @landmarker 21 день тому

    Yes, war thunder that's a worthy sponsorship

  • @markedis5902
    @markedis5902 23 дні тому

    You talk about the Falklands war, I suspect that there will be another one soon.

  • @scribehades
    @scribehades 22 дні тому +1

    Don't let the hose fool you.😂