The US Military's Aerial Refueling PROBLEM

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
  • Play War Thunder for FREE on PC, Playstation and Xbox.
    Click the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now: playwt.link/notwhatyouthink2024
    0:00 How long can a fighter jet fly for without aerial refueling?
    2:33 Why was the flying boom developed?
    3:44 KC-97 Stratofreighter's major flaw
    4:51 Aerial refueling from a KC-135 Stratotanker
    7:32 why aircraft have a refueling slipway
    8:19 War Thunder (sponsor)
    9:16 Refueling stealth aircraft in the air
    10:29 What happens if aerial refueling boom or hose cannot be retracted
    10:49 The downside of the KC-135 Stratotanker
    11:04 The Boom Drogue Adapter (BDA)
    12:05 The limitations of the Boom Drogue Adapter
    Why the US Navy uses its most sophisticated fighter jets fuel other aircraft, how aerial refueling can help airplanes save on fuel and carry more payload, what made the F-4 Phantom notoriously difficult to mate with, and finally, how using a slower fuel transfer method can in fact speed up the refueling process, is #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #longs
    Music:
    Universal Solution - Robert Ruth
    Yhello - Lofive
    Parkour Law - Truvio
    The Showroom - V.V. Campos
    Amalthea - Van Sandano
    Flightmode - Chris Shards
    Skipping Class - Birdies
    Cloak - Christoffer Moe Ditlevsen
    Break Down - Phoenix Tail
    Composite Key - DEX 1200
    Thyone - Ben Elson
    Montage of a Map - Eden Avery
    Beyond the Mountains - Experia
    On the Trail - Tigerblood Jewel
    Linda Low - Lucention
    Footage:
    Select images/videos from Getty Images
    Shutterstock
    US Department of Defense
    Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."

КОМЕНТАРІ • 372

  • @NotWhatYouThink
    @NotWhatYouThink  Місяць тому +41

    Play War Thunder for FREE on PC, Playstation and Xbox.
    Click the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now: playwt.link/notwhatyouthink2024

    • @LaggySoupDealer
      @LaggySoupDealer Місяць тому +11

      vid about war thunder military leaks?

    • @skoldmo762
      @skoldmo762 Місяць тому +3

      Vid about Gajin sponsors Donbas seperatists? ​@@LaggySoupDealer

    • @LordBobeus-to9yz
      @LordBobeus-to9yz Місяць тому +3

      its not really a limited time offer, war thunder sponsors youtubers so often that you can find this offer for every day of the year

    • @VGACGAEGA
      @VGACGAEGA Місяць тому

      Best segue ever

    • @dedwoodgaming6119
      @dedwoodgaming6119 Місяць тому

      dont you will regret playing it

  • @PonyK98
    @PonyK98 Місяць тому +351

    Kid: Dad. What are those two planes doing together?
    Dad: They are mating son

    • @benstokes69
      @benstokes69 Місяць тому +4

      😂😂

    • @cruisinguy6024
      @cruisinguy6024 Місяць тому +4

      I definitely read the dad in a Hank Hill voice

    • @lweberk
      @lweberk Місяць тому +8

      That's how airplanes are made, son

    • @Michael_Brock
      @Michael_Brock Місяць тому +5

      Btw I did see 3 planes in serial formation drogue formation.

    • @seansingh4421
      @seansingh4421 Місяць тому +5

      @@Michael_Brocksometimes planes experiment with other planes son to keep the “fire” going

  • @OrionArmwrestling
    @OrionArmwrestling Місяць тому +292

    "A boomer, laying on their belly, passing gas." - Not What You Think

    • @bgold2007
      @bgold2007 8 днів тому +1

      Like the first gals smile

    • @unrealzman68
      @unrealzman68 3 дні тому

      This line killed me 😂

    • @bigblue6917
      @bigblue6917 3 дні тому

      If that's what they do then I think we could all qualify for that job. Just remember you're a confined space so nothing too spicy

    • @Richtshn06
      @Richtshn06 3 дні тому

      This!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂

  • @therealdohos2607
    @therealdohos2607 Місяць тому +189

    I Laughed out loud when u inserted the warthunder sponsor after the hourly price of the simulator

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +13

      Either losing money to refuel those jet, of losing to the snail 😂

    • @z0phi3l
      @z0phi3l Місяць тому +3

      Warthunder needs a mod to practice in air refueling !!!

    • @user-gu8qi4me8x
      @user-gu8qi4me8x 27 днів тому

      I actually agree ​@@z0phi3l

    • @diadromes8000
      @diadromes8000 10 днів тому

      @@z0phi3l vtol vr does... as the craft being refueled

    • @BBerkow
      @BBerkow 21 годину тому

      I was about to comment the same thing lol great transition!

  • @abc-coleaks-info3180
    @abc-coleaks-info3180 Місяць тому +65

    If the “birdie” is old, bent or slightly damaged the damn thing will often oscillate in a figure eight pattern requiring the Naval Pilot to split the difference and aim for where it will be when he gets there.

    • @trumanhw
      @trumanhw 3 дні тому

      On booms, the camera should be near // on the control surfaces, significantly closer to the receptical, allowing far more precise control & viewing.

    • @bigblue6917
      @bigblue6917 3 дні тому +3

      "If the “birdie” is old, bent or slightly damaged the damn thing will often oscillate in a figure eight pattern" Happens to the best of us.

  • @fuzzybloodpc9291
    @fuzzybloodpc9291 Місяць тому +25

    9:54 I thought that was a still image!!

  • @taesssi
    @taesssi Місяць тому +14

    lmao "Incase a tanker gets too excited and cannot retract the boom....." - NWYT

    • @WhiteCoastRS
      @WhiteCoastRS 25 днів тому +3

      NWYT? more like NSFW

    • @SwordOfApollo
      @SwordOfApollo 16 днів тому +5

      "If your boom extension lasts longer than 4 hours, seek medical attention."

    • @WhiteCoastRS
      @WhiteCoastRS 9 днів тому

      @@SwordOfApollo BRO WHATS THE TIMESTAMP HAHA

    • @ronparrish6666
      @ronparrish6666 20 годин тому

      Why is there a smile on her face when he makes contact

  • @anotherbacklog
    @anotherbacklog Місяць тому +36

    Now thanks to this video I can never look at aerial refueling the same way again

  • @davidemartorana4708
    @davidemartorana4708 Місяць тому +104

    Sex bots really like videos on military Aviation, Who would have thought

    • @Ilix42
      @Ilix42 Місяць тому +25

      It's all the aerial mating. Really gets them going.

    • @anotherbacklog
      @anotherbacklog Місяць тому

      Extra kinky

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +1

      😂

    • @Kenny-yl9pc
      @Kenny-yl9pc Місяць тому

      what is a sex bot?

    • @SpaceMonkeyBoi
      @SpaceMonkeyBoi 4 дні тому

      ​@@Kenny-yl9pc it's a robot designed by the US government to combat the declining birthrate. It breaks into people's homes and abducts people's fathers to use them for reproduction. It's why so many kids these days grow up without a father.

  • @michaelmckeever2734
    @michaelmckeever2734 Місяць тому +7

    I lost count of the number of ARs I've done. One time, over Maine on our way to a deployment, we disconnected from the KC-135 about 6-9 times because our orbit was over a thunderstorm and we couldn't maintain contact. Quite literally the most stressful AR ever.

  • @carlsoll
    @carlsoll Місяць тому +20

    9:55 Woahh O.O *that* was a video :o

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for pointing it😂

    • @Tobinator7274
      @Tobinator7274 Місяць тому +2

      was thinking the same thing lol

  • @flightmaster999
    @flightmaster999 Місяць тому +22

    Too bad the KC-46 can't do half of what it is designed for because Boeing used the wrong kind of (black and white) camera on them. Should have bought the MRTT instead, which is just better in every way, not to mention that is actually works.

    • @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh
      @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh Місяць тому +5

      "It's a game changer" because the camera fogs up half the time.

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 Місяць тому +45

    That thumbnail reminds me of my first *"aerial refueling"* in middle school history. Thanks Miss Blom! You'll always be twenty-two in my dreams.

  • @crazestyle83
    @crazestyle83 2 дні тому +1

    The whole whipped by the "hose" cutaway was slick

  • @cagin5
    @cagin5 Місяць тому +17

    Gasped at 19:14 seeing that NATO AWACS almost bump into the tanker!

  • @ThorsonWiles
    @ThorsonWiles Місяць тому +2

    From what I've heard about the KC-46, when the receiver is backlit, meaning the sun is close to being directly being the receiver, the digital camera's have an issue with even seeing the receiver aircraft, let alone where the boom needs to be flown into. (In my experience, in life, not anything related to this, the mark 1 usually has an advantage over tech. Meaning the eyeball in the rear vs. the camera provided image in the front.)

  • @koryhardy9594
    @koryhardy9594 Місяць тому +22

    30mins trying to stable 2 aircraft for refueling is just insane work 🤯

  • @curiousmindshubofficial
    @curiousmindshubofficial Місяць тому +2

    Super informative video! It’s amazing to understand just how critical in-flight refueling is for maintaining the operational range and effectiveness of fighter jets. Your breakdown of the process and its importance was perfectly clear. Thanks for shedding light on such a pivotal aspect of modern air combat!

  • @misanthropicphilanthropy
    @misanthropicphilanthropy 11 днів тому +3

    I'm loving the "sex puns" and fart jokes 😂 (passing gas)😂

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity День тому +2

    10:20 That is not a Navy F-35C, thats a USMC F-35B. It is however correct that both the B and C use the probe and drogue system, in contrast to the Air Force A version with the traditional Air Force boom type. Both systems have their advantages and disadvantages.

  • @adirondacker007
    @adirondacker007 17 годин тому

    I was born in the early 70's and grew up about 20 miles from Plattsburgh AFB. From as early as I can remember, seeing KC-135's and FB-111'S flying over was quite routine.

  • @iskandartaib
    @iskandartaib Місяць тому +3

    Thanks, this was a great deal more informative than I thought it would be. Learned quite a bit.

  • @capitandelespacio
    @capitandelespacio Місяць тому +4

    I remember how hard was trying to refuel in-flight my F-14 Tomcat.... (in the NES version of Top Gun).

  • @lukevaxhacker7762
    @lukevaxhacker7762 Місяць тому +12

    Does beg the question: Why is the KC-10 *retiring* while the older design KC-135 *still flying*?!

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +5

      I wondering too, why retired the best of the best among the best that proven the best already

    • @zsu-23-4shilka2
      @zsu-23-4shilka2 Місяць тому +2

      The D/KC-10 has a rather poor safety history.

    • @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh
      @fidjeenjanrjsnsfh Місяць тому +2

      Apparently, it's a numbers game. Retiring the 60 KC-10 is cheaper in the long run than splitting the number between the two airframes. Which kind of makes sense.

    • @xxxotiknightz
      @xxxotiknightz Місяць тому +5

      It has nothing to do with safety. I flew on the 10 as a boom for years. It’s a game of averages and numbers. The AF brass determined that the average offload was ~63k lbs. Which is well within the 135 and 46 capabilities. They decided more aircraft was better rather than more capabilities.

    • @jaquigreenlees
      @jaquigreenlees Місяць тому +2

      the 135 is the only option to refuel helicopters, the jet powered options wind up at or barely above stall speed if they try to refuel a helicopter.

  • @notmenotme614
    @notmenotme614 Місяць тому +1

    Another thing with drogue refuelling is sometimes the drogue can shear off, leaving it attached to the receiver aircraft. Which made their landing interesting when it still had the basket and a few meters of pipe attached.
    We’ve also experienced the drogue wafting around in turbulence and hitting the pitot probes, causing the receiver aircraft to abort.
    Having said that, the drogue method has been used for decades on 1000s of sorties.
    I remember reading the book Flight Of The Intruder, which said A-6’s fitted with a buddy refuelling pod were crucial to helping those who struggled to land on an aircraft carrier. If they struggled to get down and did many bolters, they’d send up the standby refueller to save them before they ran out of fuel.

  • @oceanmariner
    @oceanmariner 8 днів тому +1

    During the Vietnam War refueling booms were used to tow damaged aircraft returning from North Vietnam to their bases in the south.

  • @indyjons321
    @indyjons321 29 днів тому

    Fantastic video! Answered all the questions I had about tankers.

  • @jordibt1789
    @jordibt1789 Місяць тому +4

    Damn, NWYT has that Big Altima Energy

  • @Ice_Karma
    @Ice_Karma Місяць тому +1

    Always great videos! BTW, in 'scarce' and 'scarcity', the first syllable sounds like 'scare', rather than 'scar'. ♥😻

  • @No1DiscoveryTV
    @No1DiscoveryTV Місяць тому +14

    For the past 100 years air-to-air refuelling has been the exclusive preserve of military aviation to project power across the globe

    • @johnsmithe4656
      @johnsmithe4656 Місяць тому

      Yummy.

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 28 днів тому +1

      While inflight refueling saves gas, I very much doubt it saves money. An airline: -) Must buy and maintain a fleet of tankers, as well as train boom operators.
      -) The pilots of the passenger/freighter aircraft have to be trained/qualified for inflight docking
      -) Airports en route would have to be schedule for the possibility of an unscheduled landing because weather, malfunctions, etc, prevented the inflight refueling.
      -) Here's the kicker......LIABILITY...Imagine weather or operator error causing a collision, killing hundreds and the loss of two aircraft.

  • @larrybremer4930
    @larrybremer4930 3 дні тому

    The hardest part of refueling (bombers in particular) is the tanker gets lighter while the receiving aircraft gets heavier so its a constant battle to stay in the box since the tanker will get faster and you get slower thus it's a constant battle to stay in the box with the thrust and alpha changes needed while taking on fuel.
    Also air force tankers can carry wing reels with probe and drogue so they can refuel either method (drogue or boom) in the same mission. One advantage of this configuration is being able to refuel two probe type aircraft at the same time.

  • @VincentGirod
    @VincentGirod Місяць тому +2

    Always instructive and fun !

  • @ChookyChuck
    @ChookyChuck 27 днів тому

    At 21:46 there is an omega aircraft refueling a drone. In the mid 1990's I designed the 707 fuel system modifications for the 1st Omega Tanker. Omega contracted AEL/Tracor to modify one of there 707 Aircraft to be a hose and drogue tanker. The fuel system modifications installed two large Aerial Refueling pumps in the wing belly tanks. These pumps were connected with 4 inch diameter fuel lines to 2 removable pallets. Each pallet contained an FR300 hydraulic hose reel systems. These pallets where part of the B-kit and were designed to be removed from the aircraft in about an hour. With a removable Air Refueling B-Kit the Aircraft could perform either civilien or aerial refueling missions. The Aircraft had two hose reels for redundancy so that ocean crossing could be performed safely with only one tanker. It could deliver over 500 gallons per minute which was the highest flow rate for a 2 5/8 inch Inner Diameter Hose and Drogue system at the time. I have not kept up with what improvements were made to the Omega system over the years. It would be interesting to see how they are using it today.

  • @bobgreene2892
    @bobgreene2892 29 днів тому

    Well-organized and clearly presented
    We thought we already knew the "basics", until we saw this video.

  • @fyrebatskymarshall1778
    @fyrebatskymarshall1778 Місяць тому +1

    that ad transistion was mint

  • @northropi2027
    @northropi2027 Місяць тому +2

    hey, i've been to that KC-97. it's at March Field, they also have a YA-9 there.

  • @jamiebray8532
    @jamiebray8532 Місяць тому +1

    Man i love watching your videos. It seems like forever waiting for a new video to drop. I start going through dt convulsions and stuff. 😂😂😂😂

  • @ilaril
    @ilaril Місяць тому +1

    The KC-46's new system is anything but good. Maybe one day.

  • @ObiWanCannabi
    @ObiWanCannabi Місяць тому +4

    ever tried air to air refuelling on DCS world... it took me more than 45 minutes

  • @scribehades
    @scribehades Місяць тому +1

    That BOOM ENGAGED indicator light would be awesome for a sound engineering board

  • @dave.g.nowitzki4897
    @dave.g.nowitzki4897 29 днів тому

    great vid !
    i would love to know what all those markings on the planes mean like the one in 7:04 for the slip

  • @stevengmarcus
    @stevengmarcus 27 днів тому +1

    Crown royal bag for a chin pad is a nice touch

  • @counterfit5
    @counterfit5 Місяць тому +1

    I will as hoping to see the Sea King chopping off its own probe, and there it is at 19:41

  • @uss_liberty_incident
    @uss_liberty_incident Місяць тому +6

    Funny how War Thunder teaches how vital fuel management is in a modern, afterburning fighter. IE, the F-14 GUZZLES fuel at full A/B.

    • @counterfit5
      @counterfit5 Місяць тому +1

      Everything guzzles fuel in full A/B

    • @piscessoedroen
      @piscessoedroen 27 днів тому +2

      @@counterfit5 there's guzzling fuel, and then there's dumping the whole tank into the engine. F-14 is the latter

  • @lowercasegamer
    @lowercasegamer Місяць тому +26

    Slight title mistake. I think it should be Standardized not Standardize ( If he changes title ignore comment)

    • @viewer-of-content
      @viewer-of-content Місяць тому +1

      He has an accent I think. In 2x it sounded correct

    • @Rotorhead1651
      @Rotorhead1651 Місяць тому

      You are correct. Grammatically, it should be "standardized".

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +1

      Grammar MP

    • @user-gu8qi4me8x
      @user-gu8qi4me8x 27 днів тому

      ​@@muhazreenl actually agree with you.

  • @TAR3N
    @TAR3N 28 днів тому

    I always thought this was the most boring part of aviation…. And you made it fascinating ! Thank you 🙏 It’s not what you think!

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue6917 3 дні тому

    One of the capabilities of the de Havilland Sea Vixen used by the Royal Navy was to refuel other Sea Vixen's and that was back in the 60s

  • @irrelEvant5352
    @irrelEvant5352 Місяць тому +12

    0:56 i bet that took you a couple tries to say with a straight voice 😂 Peak humor right there

  • @NSJonesy94
    @NSJonesy94 Місяць тому +5

    Hahaha, Crown Royal bag for the chin rest @5:11

  • @jamesvespucci5527
    @jamesvespucci5527 4 дні тому

    "You could get whipped by those hose" sent me when I heard it, and made me laugh hard enough to scare my cat when I looked at the screen

  • @generybarczyk6993
    @generybarczyk6993 Місяць тому +1

    Good one. Flares!

  • @stevenlauzon7031
    @stevenlauzon7031 Місяць тому

    Digging the Crown Royal chin rest

  • @stevewilley1029
    @stevewilley1029 14 днів тому

    the Air Force was short sighted when it did start equipping all KC 135 tankers with MPRS when they became available. I had to install many drogue adapters in my career as a crew chief.

  • @Bruno74823..
    @Bruno74823.. Місяць тому +12

    The bots kinda love military refueling i guess not gonna judge them i also enjoy whatching planes refuel

  • @pathos48
    @pathos48 Місяць тому

    I have been wondering what that rotating hatch on B2 were. Finally I know!

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw 3 дні тому

    The camera should be near // on the boom's control surfaces, significantly closer, allowing far more precise control and viewing.

  • @larrydugan1441
    @larrydugan1441 3 дні тому

    Really good video. On a trans oceanic flight with fighters the fighters always have to have sufficient fuel on board to proceed to an alternate should the refueling system fail.
    This can mean many top ups en route. It is not just a matter of waiting until your fighter is low on fuel. On a long flight with a lot of turbulence this can be quite a bit of work.

  • @libertarian1637
    @libertarian1637 Місяць тому +5

    F-15EX can fly from US to UK without mid-air refueling. At 45 minutes the pilot must have been for an F-16.
    It’s quite standardized, US Air Force - Boom; Navy/USMC - drogue, ALL helicopters - drogue. The US military is represented by multiple branches with different needs; a one size fits all approach sometimes isn’t the best for all.

    • @XxDramaticBatu
      @XxDramaticBatu Місяць тому +1

      That name is not a mistake. F-1SEX

    • @LSmoney215
      @LSmoney215 Місяць тому +1

      I think they talking about combat conditions

  • @michaelm54877
    @michaelm54877 Місяць тому +2

    When a tanker loves a B-2 bomber very much... and that is how F-16's are born.

  • @centralplains7608
    @centralplains7608 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for a MOST comprehensive overview of the aerial refueling subject! As usual, your vids lead to a greater understanding of aviation and various systems. Plz keep up the GREAT WORK!!

  • @Michael_Brock
    @Michael_Brock Місяць тому

    Awesome video

  • @geetargeek79
    @geetargeek79 Місяць тому +1

    VFA-115 here during the period mentioned. I can say that refueling missions weren't the favorite. They were very long missions just for the pilot to be a flying gas station. Unlike those big AF tankers, the Super Hornets aren't as comfortable either. It isn't like the pilot could stand up to take a leak. But don't get me wrong because they can, just not standing up. 😂

  • @XAirForce
    @XAirForce 22 години тому

    One thing you could think about doing is making the Drug no holes so that they actually are tethered drones and they adjust themselves to the aircraft also within limits. You put a drone before the nozzle directly into the aircraft or it has a cameras, so it can see the incoming aircraft and help them refuel quicker.

    • @XAirForce
      @XAirForce 22 години тому

      You could make an adapter and put it on the end.

    • @XAirForce
      @XAirForce 22 години тому

      You definitely know you’re gonna have to get rid of the boomers and put a camera on it to automated the system to do the mating. It could take over flight operations and adjust the aircraft and the boom automatically.. in reality the two aircraft should be talking together at that point and both pilots lose so the aircraft can mate each other a lot quicker than the humans

    • @XAirForce
      @XAirForce 22 години тому

      I hate to tell you, but the humans are out of business. You’re taking up weight and time and you’re the limiting factor in war. : )

  • @BosonCollider
    @BosonCollider Місяць тому +3

    8:15 Okay, that was the smoothest ad transition I have seen ever, you deserve every cent of ad money for that and this is not something I say often

    • @muhazreen
      @muhazreen Місяць тому +1

      Either Losing dollar to refueling or to those pesky snail😂

  • @ronaldoc5637
    @ronaldoc5637 Місяць тому +2

    The Embraer KC-390 may fill that gap...

  • @tweezerjam
    @tweezerjam 14 днів тому

    Very cool. What about how they match speeds?

  • @TYZ-Foodie68
    @TYZ-Foodie68 22 дні тому

    It’s a good one !!

  • @user-ue6zx2do2f
    @user-ue6zx2do2f Місяць тому +2

    And airbus boom can refuel automatically

  • @julianp2868
    @julianp2868 Місяць тому

    Very interesting

  • @Orange_the_furry
    @Orange_the_furry 7 днів тому

    and that is how planes are made
    educational content (and excited planes)

  • @kartiksaxena152
    @kartiksaxena152 Місяць тому

    the title literally changed while i was watching wtf when i started watching it was " why the us airforce has two refueling methods " and when i clicked off its now " how aerial gas stations work "

  • @nekomakhea9440
    @nekomakhea9440 Місяць тому +2

    Wouldn't the C-2's be better refueling planes for carriers than F-18's? They would have much larger fuel capacity, and could carry extra fuel bags in their cargo bay. Also, they're turboprops, so they could probably go slow enough to refuel any helicopters or tiltrotors in the carrier's fleet. And you wouldn't need to procure new fuel drones, just use what you already have in a different way.

    • @czaja995
      @czaja995 Місяць тому +2

      C-2 is propeller aircraft, it's too slow for refueling fighter jets.

    • @abc-coleaks-info3180
      @abc-coleaks-info3180 Місяць тому +1

      The C2 is being phased out for the Osprey. They do have a setup for refueling from the Osprey but jet refueling is limited by minimum flight speed.

    • @SkyhawkSteve
      @SkyhawkSteve Місяць тому

      @@czaja995 if the KC-130 isn't too slow, then it's not clear why the C-2 would be too slow.

  • @busboy262
    @busboy262 Місяць тому

    I can't imagine what just the pivot on that adapter costs. I bet the cost of the adapter is high, but that knuckle probably accounts for more than half of that cost.

  • @h8GW
    @h8GW Місяць тому

    It's wild how the B-2 refueling door just disappears into the fuselage skin when closed.

  • @EdwardSnowden125
    @EdwardSnowden125 29 днів тому

    7:00 why don't they set up a system where after the boom is engaged both the aircraft get controlled by the pilot of the tanker(with difference in sensitivities ofc) would that not help?

  • @Kennyfornia
    @Kennyfornia 2 дні тому

    @9:57; I seriously thought it was a photo until the boom started moving! 😂😂 How is the background not even moving?! Talk about having a uncanny valley moment!

    • @NotWhatYouThink
      @NotWhatYouThink  День тому

      Yeah that’s a tricky shot. It’s in slow mo, so that’s partly why.

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 29 днів тому

    I thought I remembered your voice on the previous vid I just watched. 👍 - 👍

  • @scribehades
    @scribehades Місяць тому +1

    I'm now convinced the B-52 runs on diesel.

  • @ChloeKruegerSenpai
    @ChloeKruegerSenpai Місяць тому +2

    I see new upload video of NWYT I click.
    See NWYT sponsoring War Thunder again many times, Skip to the Trash.

    • @user-gu8qi4me8x
      @user-gu8qi4me8x 27 днів тому

      I actually genuinely agree with you and finally some one who l found in the comment section that actually has a functioning brain for once and this world actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me lol

  • @flora_7719
    @flora_7719 Місяць тому +1

    You've heard of two trucks... Now get ready for two planes

  • @Finn_given
    @Finn_given 24 дні тому

    He really likes mentioning the iron dome project in every video

  • @Dekhti-ankh
    @Dekhti-ankh Місяць тому +3

    Here we are, listening damn jokes from my boy

  • @ScotchBonnetHand_
    @ScotchBonnetHand_ Місяць тому

    I did not see that War Thunder promo coming 😂

  • @aCycloneSteve
    @aCycloneSteve 4 дні тому

    I'm 13 minutes in & they said the F-35A takes the boom, the C takes the drogue, but they didn't say what the B does to add fuel.

  • @adversopodcast
    @adversopodcast 6 днів тому

    Awesome!!! 😃👍

  • @Ashkanjustsayin
    @Ashkanjustsayin Місяць тому +1

    “The Boeing had a flaw” not surprised… not we are both on a hit list

  • @mrbharathkiran.1508
    @mrbharathkiran.1508 Місяць тому +2

    Love your video quality and content

  • @BillAllyn
    @BillAllyn День тому

    "Whipped by the hose" lol

  • @Rose.Of.Hizaki
    @Rose.Of.Hizaki 29 днів тому

    2:53 - Im guessing some Navy pilots also need more flight/seat time to their name so it looks better on paper should they want to transfer elsewhere within the military or outside of it as maybe a civilian pilot etc etc.

  • @Dog_Toy.
    @Dog_Toy. Місяць тому

    You knew what you were doing with that thumbnail.

  • @bgold2007
    @bgold2007 8 днів тому +1

    Boom too excited to retract,!

  • @Vmaxfodder
    @Vmaxfodder Місяць тому

    This cone needs to have its own stabilizing wings

  • @Vanator-qw6xw
    @Vanator-qw6xw 17 днів тому

    13:17 what aircraft is that?

  • @jjfdkdjiwejnd092
    @jjfdkdjiwejnd092 Місяць тому

    "it's okay if you can't get it up Mr plane, it happens to all of us as we get older"

  • @michaelm54877
    @michaelm54877 Місяць тому

    The hard part when fighting a near peer foe will be the protection of tankers. The new steathy drone tankers should help though.

  • @scottmeredith3359
    @scottmeredith3359 28 днів тому

    Must be harrowing to have that big hose waving around in your face, knowing it could erupt and spray at any moment

  • @HerbertTowers
    @HerbertTowers 3 дні тому

    WRONG! A drogue (with a short hose) can be attached to a boom. In principle a basket can be attached to on one boom, and another left naked.

  • @scribehades
    @scribehades Місяць тому +1

    Don't let the hose fool you.😂

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 Місяць тому +1

    How do the dtogue actually hook onto the probes?

  • @globalautobahn1132
    @globalautobahn1132 Місяць тому +1

    1:44 but the new Air Force One is not going to be capable of in-flight refueling