Linesperson, umpire, & supervisor: "We lost the mark. There's no way to know if it was in or out." TV: "Here's a buttload of replays from 3 different angles."
She had a point. Edit: when you're on the court you want the coach to be focused on the game. That's their JOB - to analyze while supporting the player. Imagine you being out there alone, struggling to put the ball in and your coach does not even pay you any attention.
11:07 I have never seen Karolina Pliskova this mad. She usually agrees, but this one, she is very, very sure she is right. I mean the ball is inside the court! Idk, maybe the lines and chair umpire were high, on xanax, or hungry or tired.
Putintseva is such a primadona. Just berating her coach like he is a child. I'd tell her where to get off. I don't care what ur paying me, nobody is going to treat me like their damn child. Frig that !
I never thought I'd say this but I actually felt bad for Putintseva at the end there. However, props to her for not breaking character and still giving an icy handshake.
She lost the mark?! Yes, cos the ball did not even touch the line, thats how much inside was. Pliskova all the way! props to her she continued and did good lumberjack work at the end! :)
I hate to say it, but the officials are affecting the livelihoods of players. This really needs to be improved. There are so many people with phones that have cameras in them, even with 60 frames per second, etc, that there is ZERO excuse for a professional tournament to not be able to rely on video reply at the very least. Why cant they refer it back to video reply, like they do in other sports? If they are going to get the tournament supervisor involved, then why not have another group of people assess it on a screen; by the time the supervisor got to court, they could have radio'd the result in. Put yourself in the shoes of Pliskova. She was robbed. Plain and simple. And the incompetent management of the tournament are to blame.
Absolutely! A good chunk of the time when players argue with umpires like this the players are right. It's ridiculous that I can be sitting on my butt in my living room thousands of miles away and get 8 replays from 3 different angles while a player gets screwed because some of these umpires are inattentive and bad at their jobs.
You're both right. One more thing to mention here is that lines people & umpires make mistakes and nothing happens to them whilst on the court a mistake can swing the match the other way. This frustrates the players and makes their minds go crazy 😝
@@boxychubbo6922 bad line calls happen in tournaments everywhere. From big tournaments, to small. And while you're being snarky, how would you feel if a loss cost you potentiallybhundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions? Would you be happy?
@@boxychubbo6922 Can I give you an example? In all honesty, probably not. Because even if there was a bad line call on an actual match point, then there's always the argument that if the call had ben made correctly, or reversed, the player might have lost the match on a subsequent match point anyway. I would have to spend a lot of time trying to find something. In saying that, have a look at the match with Sorana Cirstea, where she had SIX bad line calls, and had to rely on the hawkeye challenge to get them reversed. Even with this match, I cant honestly tell you what would have happened 100% if there was no hawkeye and the calls were forced to stand. But the point I'm making is that bad officiating exists. It's a fact. Humans make mistakes, whether its the players, or the officials. But it's the consequences of those mistakes that are a concern. Yes, YOU may like the drama. I get that. But put yourself in the shoes of a person who may have been training for years, and knows deep in their boots that their particular shot was in, only to have an official make a bad call, and not only cost you a point, but maybe a game, set, or match. If, as I said before, those consequences have impacts against endorsement deals, or even if you can't pay your hotel bill at a small tournament, then it can be financially devastating.
Yep! Makes one think. When people know the truth, have the opportunity to say something but don't and act out exclusively out of self interest. This is just a sport, but that's how the world comes to be the mess it is.
even if Sakkari knew and admitted it was in, what would happen ? Best case scenario, the point would be replayed. Sakkari suggested to replay the point anyway,so...
People put all the blame on the umpires but what the hell do them supervisors actually do? They have never changed a decision. They come on court abs clueless and just nod head. Again paid loads to do abs nothing
The devil is in the detail...the supervisor is there to supervise the smooth running of the whole match pre to post, for everyone, including spectators; they are not the judges of the umpires. I still agree though that they do abs nothing.
@@ivo7418 if they are not judges of the umpires why do the players always ask for the supervisor? Clearly something exists in the rules which makes the players think the ump's decision can be overturned.
@@Dom-yv4nq Because supervisors can only change rule interpretations meaning what is considered a medical timeout and things like that but if its a decision they are not allowed to change it, but the player's problem is that they think things like ball marks are rule interpretations rather than in essence discretion which causes the players problems
The first example on the clip was when then supervisor talked with the chair and she changed her mind. Which is why cubulkova went nuts. Although it was right to change her mind she hadn’t seen any chair do that and was arguing due to lack of precedent. I wish more umps would confer with the lines person when they say - I didn’t remember it that way. Oh it did bounce in, says the lines person close to her.- okay replay the point.
Pliskova was absolutely right to be furious about this, it was clearly in by a mile and how can the umpire be so incompetent. Thays why there should be hawkeye on clay too
I liked that she didn’t exaggerate how in it was. The hand gesture was pretty accurate, about 2 inches inside the court. Too often these players are like “it was 6 inches inside the line” and then there’s a replay and it catches the last 1/8 inch of the line.
@@DG-mt8 If you're right, and as long as you don't threaten to stuff a tennis ball down a linesman's throat, you're probably going to have the crowd on your side.
great video as always putinseva it one of my favs on tour also that pliskova call was the worst ever if there is no mark then it HAS to be called in no over rule and that wall was so in it wasnt even funny thx again
its more for guidance and advice since coaches generally were former players themselves, and if the relationship between player and coach is no good the player will not really wait to drop them and try soemone else
Wow, that hacking at the end is epic! Sakkari should have just give the next point back to Karolina by return the serve into the net, to do what exactly she had suggested, "replay the point." Sakkari clearly saw the ball was in, and the line judge and the umpire couldn't find the mark, because it was NOT outside of the line. Where is the Hawkeye when you need it? It was an epic judging fail with an epic hacking at the end. You go girl.
This was Pliskova's most likable moment. She often has no personality and is boring. I enjoy seeing her emotions come out if its anger. She kept it real. Also i lost so much respect for Cibulkova.
All signs suggest they are sleeping together and she's just throwing a fit because she needs emotional support, lol. She straight up says she doesn't need advices on tennis from him, just for him to clap when she does good. Typical woman xD
4:58 Poor Coach, the thing is these players have so much power - they can just fire people easily. The coach of a tennis player who is highly-ranked will make anything from USD 40k to 300k/year, and of course this can decrease, or increase, according to the player’s performance and the coach’s performance.
5:53 if you called that out then you need to resign from your job because clearly you are too under qualified and need to go back to sweeping streets clean instead.
They need to have on court video so you can watch the go out of in on clay court and that would have solved Pliskovas issue. They have it on hard courts but it's really needed for clay
Pliskova has had some revenge over the last year, just by her win loss record. She is a class act and seeing her hit that chair won't persuade me otherwise. All it does is confirm that often small minded, unintelligent people sometimes (inexplicably) rise to positions of authority and man when they get there do they rejoice in welding there autocratic stupidity...in the words of Mcenroe, "you cannot be serious!" That ball was in by a mile. The clay court tournament's have to use replay. Watching another knucklehead umpire trot out on the court and guess at a mark makes the clay court season almost unwatchable 😳
i wonder if umpires get sued for these bad calls. And a simple video review can solve so many of these argument. If tournaments can have expensive hawkeyes, why can't they review video replay? Just look at atp cup
I was at the Putintseva Vs. Cornet match, although I didn't understand what she said to her coach I knew she was boiling and just blabbering. She is a much stronger player in general, hopefully she can bring herself together and progress forwards in her career!
By the way, at the end when putintseva goes to get another racquet and is walking back I can be seen in that last frame with a black visor, white shirt, and black hair :)
This is why all sports need replay, including electronic balls-and-strikes calls in baseball. There is no reason to accept human error when it so clearly doesn't have to be a part of sports in many/most cases.
I hate Putintseva, but the coach should definitely be cheering her on and at least not watching videos on his phone. (I assume he's not related to her so) This is his JOB Also, I do believe Sakkari didn't see the ball.
@@parkercrossland410 Thats is literally 50% of a coaches job in any sport. Like LITERALLY. Pep talk, Getting your team or "player fired" up of helping them calm down. If you think that hell, even golf caddys are know to say just the right thing at the right moment to help bring a golfers strategy more into focus or call for the right club, approach when they see the golfer slipping off the game. Sport involves emotion no matter what side of the ball your own.
If you are playing, you look at your box and your coach is looking at his cell phone, instead of watching you, cheering, supporting and rallying you. How would you feel? That's what they are there for. I can see her point and frustration. In tennis the players are paying their coaches not to horn their skills which they already have but for emotional support primarily. But she is a bit harsh.
Wow, when Serena was cheated twice so bad that they had to revolutionize the game with Hawk Eye. But the fans and the media turned against Serena, but praises Karolino Pliskova. The Biases are so clear! Everybody has benefited from Hawk Eye, but they love showing when Serena was upset, but justify these players!! And I’ve never seen anybody destroying the Umpire Chair and get away with it and, no bad press!
I don’t watch tennis, hell I’ve never even played it. But did that girly really call her coach just to say he didn’t clap for her, and proceed to insult him while he gives genuine advice for her game. That’s wild, I’m definitely gonna be back here at 4am
I know so many young players in India who want to play but are not able to buy rackets.... and here in every other match a players breaks these expensive rackets because they don't know how to control the anger. 🙄
Conversation between Putintseva and her coach is gold :D
Linesperson, umpire, & supervisor: "We lost the mark. There's no way to know if it was in or out."
TV: "Here's a buttload of replays from 3 different angles."
I don't care that it's clay. Use shot spot
Unbelievable. These decisions can crush confidence for some time.
Scott H they use replay in football, idk why they don’t use it in tennis
exactly!!! like wtf? really? instead of talking to the player just look at the footage!
EeeeeeeeeeeeeeeXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!
being the coach of putintseva, what a nightmare :D
It's unbelievable how disrespectful a lot of tennis players are to their coaches. You dont see that in any other sport. At least not that often.
She had a point.
Edit: when you're on the court you want the coach to be focused on the game. That's their JOB - to analyze while supporting the player. Imagine you being out there alone, struggling to put the ball in and your coach does not even pay you any attention.
this is her brother i think :D that is worse
I like her, she is so passionate and competitive, her coach knows her, he knows it is in the heat of the match
@Patrick u mean, she has to fire HIM, becaus she is paying his bills
Imagine being the Ump and you get your assignment: Puts vs Cornet. I'd run the other way.
:D :D
Or ostapenko and Wozniacki
11:07
I have never seen Karolina Pliskova this mad. She usually agrees, but this one, she is very, very sure she is right. I mean the ball is inside the court! Idk, maybe the lines and chair umpire were high, on xanax, or hungry or tired.
Putintseva is such a primadona. Just berating her coach like he is a child. I'd tell her where to get off. I don't care what ur paying me, nobody is going to treat me like their damn child. Frig that !
Pliskova was right.
@@scotth6814 i don't think its possible on clay or they would have it already
@@stacitowery3475 doesn't mean she should act like a diva and then smash umpire chair.
@@echoes222 absolutely not.
That is one way to request your coach on court. The Putintseva way. 2:42.
It's like she was gonna take out her frustration on her racket but then decided to take it out on her coach instead.
Bratty, spoilt and immature children tend to act out like this when things aren’t going their way. Putintseva is trash.
I never thought I'd say this but I actually felt bad for Putintseva at the end there. However, props to her for not breaking character and still giving an icy handshake.
Wow! No one deserves a double dought nut. Not even that angry little ant 🐜
Calling the supervisor = most useless move in tennis.
Cibulkova - Hsieh on Wimbledon, supervisor was useful there :)
not as pointless as Putintseva calling her coach.
the pliskova lumberjack chop is EEEEEEVERYYTHIIIIIIIIIING
She lost the mark?! Yes, cos the ball did not even touch the line, thats how much inside was. Pliskova all the way! props to her she continued and did good lumberjack work at the end! :)
Every video on this channel is basically why every tour level tournament should require hawkeye.
Foxtenn
Did she call her trainer just to tell him why didn't you clap for me?
3:10 Putintseva said: "you are sitting there watching your stupid videos about flat earth"
Hahah i honestly at first this was mockery at us and that was not the real translation and then I started listening to their convo and it was true
Hahaha
lmaoooo I totally missed that even though I'm fluent in Russian
No she didn't say the flat earth part. She said "retarded videos.'
Oh, my God. This is even better if she said that. 😂😂😂😂😂
I hate to say it, but the officials are affecting the livelihoods of players. This really needs to be improved. There are so many people with phones that have cameras in them, even with 60 frames per second, etc, that there is ZERO excuse for a professional tournament to not be able to rely on video reply at the very least.
Why cant they refer it back to video reply, like they do in other sports? If they are going to get the tournament supervisor involved, then why not have another group of people assess it on a screen; by the time the supervisor got to court, they could have radio'd the result in.
Put yourself in the shoes of Pliskova. She was robbed. Plain and simple. And the incompetent management of the tournament are to blame.
Absolutely! A good chunk of the time when players argue with umpires like this the players are right. It's ridiculous that I can be sitting on my butt in my living room thousands of miles away and get 8 replays from 3 different angles while a player gets screwed because some of these umpires are inattentive and bad at their jobs.
You're both right. One more thing to mention here is that lines people & umpires make mistakes and nothing happens to them whilst on the court a mistake can swing the match the other way. This frustrates the players and makes their minds go crazy 😝
@@boxychubbo6922 bad line calls happen in tournaments everywhere. From big tournaments, to small. And while you're being snarky, how would you feel if a loss cost you potentiallybhundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions? Would you be happy?
@@boxychubbo6922 Can I give you an example? In all honesty, probably not. Because even if there was a bad line call on an actual match point, then there's always the argument that if the call had ben made correctly, or reversed, the player might have lost the match on a subsequent match point anyway. I would have to spend a lot of time trying to find something.
In saying that, have a look at the match with Sorana Cirstea, where she had SIX bad line calls, and had to rely on the hawkeye challenge to get them reversed. Even with this match, I cant honestly tell you what would have happened 100% if there was no hawkeye and the calls were forced to stand. But the point I'm making is that bad officiating exists. It's a fact. Humans make mistakes, whether its the players, or the officials.
But it's the consequences of those mistakes that are a concern. Yes, YOU may like the drama. I get that. But put yourself in the shoes of a person who may have been training for years, and knows deep in their boots that their particular shot was in, only to have an official make a bad call, and not only cost you a point, but maybe a game, set, or match. If, as I said before, those consequences have impacts against endorsement deals, or even if you can't pay your hotel bill at a small tournament, then it can be financially devastating.
Poor Pliskova, Ball is clearly IN .
Sakkari knows. Yeas, you want to win, yes it’s not your responsibility or duty to say if it was in or out, but she knows it was in and should say so.
Yep! Makes one think. When people know the truth, have the opportunity to say something but don't and act out exclusively out of self interest. This is just a sport, but that's how the world comes to be the mess it is.
even if Sakkari knew and admitted it was in, what would happen ? Best case scenario, the point would be replayed. Sakkari suggested to replay the point anyway,so...
sgt pepper if she admitted it was in. She would lose the point cause she was nowhere near the ball.
She is the nicest person on tour. I truly believe she didn’t see. She even offered to replay the point. She showed good sportsmanship.
Chef Luca I didn’t see the part about her wanting to replay the point. If that’s the case, I will give her the benefit of the doubt.
Jennifer Zhang needs some glasses. She is always involved in drama, and btw why is the blond chick from Pliskova-Sakkari match not fired yet!?
People put all the blame on the umpires but what the hell do them supervisors actually do? They have never changed a decision. They come on court abs clueless and just nod head. Again paid loads to do abs nothing
Totally agree. I've never seen a supervisor change an umps decision.
The devil is in the detail...the supervisor is there to supervise the smooth running of the whole match pre to post, for everyone, including spectators; they are not the judges of the umpires. I still agree though that they do abs nothing.
@@ivo7418 if they are not judges of the umpires why do the players always ask for the supervisor? Clearly something exists in the rules which makes the players think the ump's decision can be overturned.
@@Dom-yv4nq Because supervisors can only change rule interpretations meaning what is considered a medical timeout and things like that but if its a decision they are not allowed to change it, but the player's problem is that they think things like ball marks are rule interpretations rather than in essence discretion which causes the players problems
The first example on the clip was when then supervisor talked with the chair and she changed her mind. Which is why cubulkova went nuts. Although it was right to change her mind she hadn’t seen any chair do that and was arguing due to lack of precedent. I wish more umps would confer with the lines person when they say - I didn’t remember it that way. Oh it did bounce in, says the lines person close to her.- okay replay the point.
For once, Cornet was not the dramatic queen.
Shocking right lol
I love Piskova since this point :)
Pliskova was absolutely right to be furious about this, it was clearly in by a mile and how can the umpire be so incompetent. Thays why there should be hawkeye on clay too
@@DG-mt8 i would support any player arguing against this, it was in by a mile
I liked that she didn’t exaggerate how in it was. The hand gesture was pretty accurate, about 2 inches inside the court. Too often these players are like “it was 6 inches inside the line” and then there’s a replay and it catches the last 1/8 inch of the line.
@@DG-mt8 If you're right, and as long as you don't threaten to stuff a tennis ball down a linesman's throat, you're probably going to have the crowd on your side.
Match supervisor comes to the player's rescue again!!.... oh wait, they never do lol
Two in one day? You're spoiling us!
Two new videos in 5 min
Nice
now is 2020, why still no hawk eye in clay court?
the inaccuracy of hawk eye is much accurate than finding a ball mark in clay court
Yeah, what a fucking joke.
I read that it doesn't work well on clay. Dust
@@deliciano1294 icic, that's why there are some non-official reviews in WTA using hawkeye
'Get rid of that stupid smirk on your face' LOL i can't.
She said 'your f--king smirk' in Russian.
12:09
The chair umpire should resign.
great video as always putinseva it one of my favs on tour also that pliskova call was the worst ever if there is no mark then it HAS to be called in no over rule and that wall was so in it wasnt even funny thx again
These coach player relationships are so weird. The player pays the coach so they are employees but it is the employee telling the boss what to do.
its more for guidance and advice since coaches generally were former players themselves, and if the relationship between player and coach is no good the player will not really wait to drop them and try soemone else
9:36 she's using way too many words just to say "i'm totally useless and i have no idea what i'm doing here"
exactly lmaoooo
Ostapenko vs putinseva - that's a game I'd love to see!
Wow, that hacking at the end is epic! Sakkari should have just give the next point back to Karolina by return the serve into the net, to do what exactly she had suggested, "replay the point." Sakkari clearly saw the ball was in, and the line judge and the umpire couldn't find the mark, because it was NOT outside of the line. Where is the Hawkeye when you need it?
It was an epic judging fail with an epic hacking at the end. You go girl.
This was Pliskova's most likable moment. She often has no personality and is boring. I enjoy seeing her emotions come out if its anger. She kept it real. Also i lost so much respect for Cibulkova.
OMG Putintseva, he's your coach, how dare you say bad thing like that to him.
bro pms does that ;'(
All signs suggest they are sleeping together and she's just throwing a fit because she needs emotional support, lol. She straight up says she doesn't need advices on tennis from him, just for him to clap when she does good. Typical woman xD
if umpire can't show the mark then shouldnt it be a replay game?
How can you not find a mark when the speed of the ball was more than 100km/h?
When i see putintseva vs cornet instantly i started to laugh 😅🤣😂
That longline shot in the second clip was clearly out lol
Thank God Cibulkova is done.
putintseva berating her coach for not cheering her on and not giving her attention is the cutest thing somehow
I like this channel 👍
Man on Clay Court they should just use Hawk Eye. That would end the arguments once in for all(though they are not accurate at times).
4:58 Poor Coach, the thing is these players have so much power - they can just fire people easily. The coach of a tennis player who is highly-ranked will make anything from USD 40k to 300k/year, and of course this can decrease, or increase, according to the player’s performance and the coach’s performance.
i bet most people watching these replays do not want hawk eye cuz then these good dramas will go away xD
Player: Hey that point was in!
Supervisor: Sorry there is nothing we can do.
Player: What about the TV footage?
Poor Putintseva's coach.
Family affairs
The nose on Cornet
I'm just surprised Cornet was playing a match with hoop earrings in...
*Player's face contorts into a rictus of grimacing hopelessness and despair.
Announcer: "She gives a little wry smile...."
why the umpires doesn't pay for his mistakes? It should be fine for such as bad decision, that take the points from players.
5:53 if you called that out then you need to resign from your job because clearly you are too under qualified and need to go back to sweeping streets clean instead.
No wonder pliskova was mad. It wasnt even close the ball landed inside the line.
They need to have on court video so you can watch the go out of in on clay court and that would have solved Pliskovas issue. They have it on hard courts but it's really needed for clay
Oh my that Putintseva double bagel gave me a little more life 😍😇
Lol Sakkaris face when Pliskova hit the umpires chair.
The Worst Umpire Are Tennis Umpire 😂 haha
Please more videos like these
I don't like Pliskova but I'm with her on this one. She was robbed
I am more interested in what happened to that chair? did they fix it by the time the next match was on?
I always get confused Cibulkova with Putinseva. Both got similar features and unsportsmanlike attitude.
Sakkari has very wide shoulders
Pliskova has had some revenge over the last year, just by her win loss record. She is a class act and seeing her hit that chair won't persuade me otherwise. All it does is confirm that often small minded, unintelligent people sometimes (inexplicably) rise to positions of authority and man when they get there do they rejoice in welding there autocratic stupidity...in the words of Mcenroe, "you cannot be serious!" That ball was in by a mile. The clay court tournament's have to use replay. Watching another knucklehead umpire trot out on the court and guess at a mark makes the clay court season almost unwatchable 😳
Nope, that's no excuse for her or the coach. Classless!
Really Frustrating moment when you are overruled on champ.point and then you lose the final.
Lesson there is to always hit the ball back if you can
@@Johnny-cz2wv which su wei hsieh did at Wimbledon but she didn’t. So she cant complain that its the same scenario. Poor logic
That's why Tennis need line detector, even in clay.
I guess the coach is Putintseva's boyfriend....
Sakarri said she didn’t see the mark!
Funny!
Jejeje yulia's coach ended sooo fired after that match
i wonder if umpires get sued for these bad calls. And a simple video review can solve so many of these argument. If tournaments can have expensive hawkeyes, why can't they review video replay? Just look at atp cup
I'm confused on what happened with Hsieh. Can someone explain
Bonus Tennis Drama | Part 01 | Drama on the Lawn
in this video you can see on your own :)
Why putintseva is still playing tennis? She doesn't enjoy this sport at all
Right?! She looks absolutely miserable!
well,since that match (2017) she won a title,reached the QF of R.G, won the no1 player...not too bad eh?
@@pepper696867 It is not about het career achievement but her attitude on the court which makes me feel that she doesn't even enjoy playing tennis.
@@mingwu4331 the same has Nick Kyrgios, SO??? go watch teletubbies please moron!!!
Does anyone know the name of the track being played in the cornet Putinseva match??????
the made one heck of a mistake on Plis ball..clearly in..
What happened to your video that Vickery was in? I can’t find please reply me @TennisAdvocate
Copyright removed 😔
I was at the Putintseva Vs. Cornet match, although I didn't understand what she said to her coach I knew she was boiling and just blabbering. She is a much stronger player in general, hopefully she can bring herself together and progress forwards in her career!
By the way, at the end when putintseva goes to get another racquet and is walking back I can be seen in that last frame with a black visor, white shirt, and black hair :)
This is why all sports need replay, including electronic balls-and-strikes calls in baseball. There is no reason to accept human error when it so clearly doesn't have to be a part of sports in many/most cases.
good lord that umpire was terrible on the clay.
I hate Putintseva, but the coach should definitely be cheering her on and at least not watching videos on his phone. (I assume he's not related to her so) This is his JOB
Also, I do believe Sakkari didn't see the ball.
I don't see not actively cheering being an issue on the mens side, or even most of the womens side. Coaches aren't there for emotional support.
@@parkercrossland410 Thats is literally 50% of a coaches job in any sport. Like LITERALLY.
Pep talk, Getting your team or "player fired" up of helping them calm down.
If you think that hell, even golf caddys are know to say just the right thing at the right moment to help bring a golfers strategy more into focus or call for the right club, approach when they see the golfer slipping off the game. Sport involves emotion no matter what side of the ball your own.
If you are playing, you look at your box and your coach is looking at his cell phone, instead of watching you, cheering, supporting and rallying you. How would you feel? That's what they are there for. I can see her point and frustration. In tennis the players are paying their coaches not to horn their skills which they already have but for emotional support primarily. But she is a bit harsh.
Wow, when Serena was cheated twice so bad that they had to revolutionize the game with Hawk Eye. But the fans and the media turned against Serena, but praises Karolino Pliskova. The Biases are so clear! Everybody has benefited from Hawk Eye, but they love showing when Serena was upset, but justify these players!! And I’ve never seen anybody destroying the Umpire Chair and get away with it and, no bad press!
No mark, it's on the line.
you should go check your eyes, mate. it's well inside the line.
i understand your point but why she give the point for shakari ????
i will be even more angry than Pliskova if that shit happened to me
Who is this Putintseva? I have never heard of her but she appears in all these drama videos.
I don’t watch tennis, hell I’ve never even played it. But did that girly really call her coach just to say he didn’t clap for her, and proceed to insult him while he gives genuine advice for her game. That’s wild, I’m definitely gonna be back here at 4am
Why in the hell no replay to watch for the umpires
If I was Puts coach I would have clapped the final point, waved at her, then got the fk out of dodge.
Not a good way to win the match for Sakari
6:30: Unusual to see Pliskova in one of these videos. And if we did, it would be Sakkari causing the ruckus.
I know so many young players in India who want to play but are not able to buy rackets.... and here in every other match a players breaks these expensive rackets because they don't know how to control the anger. 🙄
I hope the chair umpire offered Pliskova an apology afterward, this is just plain stupidity and incompetency.
Where does one apply to become an umpire? I think I qualify....
Cheatbulkova
I was going to say "get rid of that stupid smirk on your face!" was was harsh @4:10 but then i saw his smirk LOL shes right
Pliskova kicking off.
It’s clear to me that there is a huge problem in officiating in women’s tennis. Why is that?
Does supervisor have super powers or something? xDD.....
MONEY TALK : money can buy everything including referee and
the pride of the opponent
STUPID umpire 🤷🤮, the ball inside
Why the umpire refuse to accepts Karolinas handshake?
Plishkova got robbed in broad daylight.
Stevie Wonder called and he said the ball was way in and the refs could not make a good call if it was spelled out in Braille.😆
Announcer says Dominika was there … BUT SHE DIDNT RETURN THE BALL ,!!
I can the Coach and Pliskova self to 100% understand! That was a new cheating on a WTA Player
In most cases, supervisor is just a flower vase!!!
So the first ball was out but cibulkova was wrong on all others